User talk:The Keymaster/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:The Keymaster. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Image copyright problem with Image:SylviaMason-James.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:SylviaMason-James.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 04:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to The Smiths (album), it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 10:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. When you recently edited King of America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sonny Boy Williamson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kimono My House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smiths (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Long Tall Weekend, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Severe Tire Damage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Devo discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monster Man. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Oh, No! It's Devo
- added a link pointing to Freedom of Choice
- Shout (Devo album)
- added a link pointing to Love Machine
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, The Keymaster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dominatrix (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freestyle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Let It Be... Naked, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat O'Brien. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Assault on Precinct 13 (soundtrack), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dark Star and Alan Howarth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brad Dourif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, The Keymaster. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Best O' Boingo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dead Man's Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Listen to the Band (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Richards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Farewell (Oingo Boingo album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Farewell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Moog Cookbook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Moment of Truth (The Real Milli Vanilli album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All or Nothing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, The Keymaster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elvis Costello, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cold Mountain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mondo Bizarro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brain Drain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Red, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Last Outlaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Aero Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Kevin Connor, Bernard Rose, Candyman, The Beyond, Gary Sherman and Mary Lambert
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Just What I Needed: The Cars Anthology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Door to Door (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for December 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Doors (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4K (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Greatest Hits – Volume 1: 20 Good Vibrations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Pellington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dolenz, Jones, Boyce & Hart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Davy Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Absolute Beginners (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kojak Variety, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Carr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:02, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olodum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Three O'Clock High, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plastics (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rough Trade.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TTG Studios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roosevelt Hotel.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rag and Bone Buffet: Rare Cuts and Leftovers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dear God.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Devo pages
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I need an expert opinion on a number of ongoing edits that are happening on the Devo album pages. An editor, in addition to not adhering to basic MOS:ALBUM style concepts (like italicization, quotation marks, capitalization), has also created and continues to add to absolutely exhaustive "Tour" sections, with information taken from what is basically a bootleg site. Additionally, they have been adding percentage calculations to the sections, tallying how many songs were performed from each album, how many were performed from prior set lists, etc. Here is an example. Most of this information seems extremely superfluous, the sourcing is dubious and it definitely clutters the pages, in my opinion. Are these edits acceptable and, if not, how should this be dealt with? Thanks.—The Keymaster (talk) 05:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- You can't use the {{help}} templates to solicit allies for a content dispute, but I can advise you on things you can do. If you disagree with the direction another editor is taking with a page, by all means bring it up as a discussion on the article talk page or, sometimes, on the user's talk page. This way they can discover that not everyone agrees with what they are doing. When you see edits that are poorly sourced, you can undo them and, again, explain the reasoning in either a detailed edit summary or a talk page discussion. Some of these things may fall into the category of fancruft, which you can explain to the other editor, perhaps suggesting that they take their enthusiasm to Fandom or some other site more appropriate for this level of detail. Finally, if you do want to recruit allies, you may want to go to the talk page of the relevant WikiProject and ask for a second opinion about the overall direction of a set of edits. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Devo
I noticed you've interest in Devo and have edited their entry recently. I wanted to let you know about a new short documentary on the band and their gear. Mark Mothersbaugh gives a tour through their studio. Might be of use for a reference or external link.
Thanks for you editing efforts! CorridorX (talk) 14:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
ltw
hi! sorry for any confusion. i removed that section because it consists of original research and completely lacks citations...not because i disagree with the one fact about edith head. (although that one seems to be especially original research!) anyway, most of that content seems to be non-notable anyhow. preferably we can avoid an edit war here, but, in all that section is very scattered and not very encyclopedic (or verifiable), so i don't think it belongs. ~ Boomur [talk] 23:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
- (i might find occasion to quote WP:V: "Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." ~ Boomur [talk] 23:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC))
- okay, sorry for going ahead before getting a response, but i think i've found a happy medium. per WP:OR, i've moved some of the "attributable" information to "song origins", and deleted what could not be confirmed by a reliable published source at this time. perhaps deleting the entire section was a bit rash, but as i said in my original edit summary, it was only a temporary solution so that the information could be restructured and stripped of any unverifiable content. ~ Boomur [talk] 00:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- You conveniently ignored many pieces of information in the article that have no source, such as the line about songs first surfacing on Dial-A-Song. If you are going to complain about all facts being verifiable, you should have to add sources for your claims as well. The fact that "Edith Head" has the same music bed as the Mink Car version and that many of these songs are Factory Showroom outtakes have been long established facts in the TMBG community for over a decade. The latter was even mentioned in the Info Club newsletter from summer of 1999. If you want to be pedantic and include a source for every single piece of info in the article (many of which are easily verifiable via TMBW), I can do that, but it will take a while. I will continue working on this. The Keymaster (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- whoa hey, i am not trying to be hostile here! as i said, TMBW is not an acceptable source for Wikipedia, per WP:RS (this was also discussed in a recent DYK related to TMBG). the first three sentences (including the Dial-A-Song facroid) in the "song origins" section are actually all traceable to the Westnet interview with John Linnell. here's a quotation: "As a sort of 'premium' Dial-A-Song compilation, Long Tall Weekend collects unreleased studio material that, taken together, stands up as well as any other TMBG release. It's full of surprises -- from the longtime Dial-A-Song favorites 'Dark and Metric' and 'Token Back to Brooklyn'...". sorry if that was unclear. i'm not trying to be pedantic. not every piece of information needs a direct verifiable source, but if it is open to challenge, then it does. this is not a rule i made up, it's Wikipedia policy. sorry for any inconvenience. i'm quite aware that these facts are verified on TMBW and in the TMBG community, but that in itself does not make them eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia. that's why TMBW is a separate entity. ~ Boomur [talk] 00:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- There are MANY pieces of information you left intact that are not verified with sources. I will be removing them. Also, where is the Linnell Westnet interview? No link is provided. ~ The Keymaster (talk) 00:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- my bad, it's here, and i'll add it to the ref. i'm not sure what you're referring to about the unverified information? perhaps you could clarify here before an edit war ensues? i've cited all the information i added to the page, unless it exists de facto...if you'd like to challenge something i can provide sources. i'm sorry if i've created a disturbance, i think i'm missing something here...sorry! ~ Boomur [talk] 00:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- again, maybe you could clarify the changes you want to make prior to editing the page? Discogs is also a sort of wiki in that it consists entirely of user-generated content, and therefore it is not really a reliable source for Wikipedia. i'd like to accept the info club citation in good faith, but it's a bit vague...
could you provide a scan or transcription? unfortunately, even TMBW doesn't list any info club entries from 1999 (if you have some i'd urge you to add them there as well!).ah, i think i've found the entry to which you refer; however, it does not list all the tracks you mentioned...i'll make the appropriate change. ~ Boomur [talk] 01:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)- Well, what IS an acceptable discography source for you? There are other facts contained in the article that only cite Wikipedia itself as a source. (For example, linking to the No! page to verify that "The Edison Museum" was reissued on that album.) I just think you are being needlessly pedantic. You are the first person in 12 years that has suggested that "Edith Head" is a complete re-recording or that half of this album isn't Factory Showroom outtakes. The Info Club newsletter may not be online (or it might be hiding somewhere...hopefully), but it made a lot of this stuff common knowledge back in 1999. I have a transcription sitting right here in front of me. (I made a CD-R of the album and created my own liner notes from it.) Come to think of it, I believe there was a similar press release for Mink Car that talked about each track, including "Edith Head". I will have to search my archives at a later date. ~ The Keymaster (talk) 01:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- er, as previously stated, some things, like which songs were on which albums, can be accepted de facto (again, see WP:OR for a much better clarification of what i'm trying to say). you can find a list of good sources for discographical information here (note Discogs is listed in "sources to avoid"). i'm not arguing about whether or not "edith head" was re-recorded, i'm saying that there is no verifiable source for this information besides the "fan community", which can't be cited. also, i think you're referring to A Song-By-Song Drive-Through Of Mink Car, which doesn't actually make any reference to ltw. ~ Boomur [talk] 01:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- So you accept those "de facto" yet remove mention that "Lullaby" had already appeared on Hello the Band, an easily verifiable fact? You are being hypocritical. And yes, you did argue about "Edith Head" being re-recorded. As you said, "edith head is definitely different instrumentation: the bug-eating at the end is a giveaway. they're also in different keys." Not even close to being accurate. I will continuing revising. ~ The Keymaster (talk) 01:27, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Also, the "Song By Song Drive Through" isn't the source I was referring to.~ The Keymaster (talk) 01:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- i didn't actually remove the mention of "lullaby to nightmares" having been previously released, although i suppose i made it a little more vague? i don't really think that detracts from anyone's understanding of...anything, but i apologise if you disagree on that count. sorry, i was being unclear again: yes, i previously argued that "edith head" was re-recorded, but to be quite honest it's irrelevant to the current discussion. right now, my argument is that it is not possible to verify the extent to which "edith head" was re-recorded, because no verifiable source ever makes reference to it. therefore, it does not belong on Wikipedia. please clarify what you are going to "revise" before doing so. i do not understand your intent here. my only problem with the information you are adding is that it is not verified. i am not personally challenging the truth of the information. i agree that long tall weekend is mostly fs outtakes. but, again, i can't stress this enough, "Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." this information cannot be verified. it is original fan research. i apologise if this has come across as a personal attack, as that was never my intention, but please follow Wikipedia's policies. ~ Boomur [talk] 01:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- You removed the original release source of "Lullaby" ("Hello the Band" EP), even though it is de facto information. And "Edith Head" is entirely relevant, as it was the first piece of information that you removed, which started this mess. You ask for verification before revising your words but did not afford me the same luxury. Notice that you are the first person to argue with me in the many years I've been here. I stand by my assessment: you are being both pedantic and hypocritical. I'm done. ~ The Keymaster (talk) 01:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- i didn't actually remove the mention of "lullaby to nightmares" having been previously released, although i suppose i made it a little more vague? i don't really think that detracts from anyone's understanding of...anything, but i apologise if you disagree on that count. sorry, i was being unclear again: yes, i previously argued that "edith head" was re-recorded, but to be quite honest it's irrelevant to the current discussion. right now, my argument is that it is not possible to verify the extent to which "edith head" was re-recorded, because no verifiable source ever makes reference to it. therefore, it does not belong on Wikipedia. please clarify what you are going to "revise" before doing so. i do not understand your intent here. my only problem with the information you are adding is that it is not verified. i am not personally challenging the truth of the information. i agree that long tall weekend is mostly fs outtakes. but, again, i can't stress this enough, "Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." this information cannot be verified. it is original fan research. i apologise if this has come across as a personal attack, as that was never my intention, but please follow Wikipedia's policies. ~ Boomur [talk] 01:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- er, as previously stated, some things, like which songs were on which albums, can be accepted de facto (again, see WP:OR for a much better clarification of what i'm trying to say). you can find a list of good sources for discographical information here (note Discogs is listed in "sources to avoid"). i'm not arguing about whether or not "edith head" was re-recorded, i'm saying that there is no verifiable source for this information besides the "fan community", which can't be cited. also, i think you're referring to A Song-By-Song Drive-Through Of Mink Car, which doesn't actually make any reference to ltw. ~ Boomur [talk] 01:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Well, what IS an acceptable discography source for you? There are other facts contained in the article that only cite Wikipedia itself as a source. (For example, linking to the No! page to verify that "The Edison Museum" was reissued on that album.) I just think you are being needlessly pedantic. You are the first person in 12 years that has suggested that "Edith Head" is a complete re-recording or that half of this album isn't Factory Showroom outtakes. The Info Club newsletter may not be online (or it might be hiding somewhere...hopefully), but it made a lot of this stuff common knowledge back in 1999. I have a transcription sitting right here in front of me. (I made a CD-R of the album and created my own liner notes from it.) Come to think of it, I believe there was a similar press release for Mink Car that talked about each track, including "Edith Head". I will have to search my archives at a later date. ~ The Keymaster (talk) 01:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- There are MANY pieces of information you left intact that are not verified with sources. I will be removing them. Also, where is the Linnell Westnet interview? No link is provided. ~ The Keymaster (talk) 00:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- whoa hey, i am not trying to be hostile here! as i said, TMBW is not an acceptable source for Wikipedia, per WP:RS (this was also discussed in a recent DYK related to TMBG). the first three sentences (including the Dial-A-Song facroid) in the "song origins" section are actually all traceable to the Westnet interview with John Linnell. here's a quotation: "As a sort of 'premium' Dial-A-Song compilation, Long Tall Weekend collects unreleased studio material that, taken together, stands up as well as any other TMBG release. It's full of surprises -- from the longtime Dial-A-Song favorites 'Dark and Metric' and 'Token Back to Brooklyn'...". sorry if that was unclear. i'm not trying to be pedantic. not every piece of information needs a direct verifiable source, but if it is open to challenge, then it does. this is not a rule i made up, it's Wikipedia policy. sorry for any inconvenience. i'm quite aware that these facts are verified on TMBW and in the TMBG community, but that in itself does not make them eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia. that's why TMBW is a separate entity. ~ Boomur [talk] 00:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- You conveniently ignored many pieces of information in the article that have no source, such as the line about songs first surfacing on Dial-A-Song. If you are going to complain about all facts being verifiable, you should have to add sources for your claims as well. The fact that "Edith Head" has the same music bed as the Mink Car version and that many of these songs are Factory Showroom outtakes have been long established facts in the TMBG community for over a decade. The latter was even mentioned in the Info Club newsletter from summer of 1999. If you want to be pedantic and include a source for every single piece of info in the article (many of which are easily verifiable via TMBW), I can do that, but it will take a while. I will continue working on this. The Keymaster (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- okay, sorry for going ahead before getting a response, but i think i've found a happy medium. per WP:OR, i've moved some of the "attributable" information to "song origins", and deleted what could not be confirmed by a reliable published source at this time. perhaps deleting the entire section was a bit rash, but as i said in my original edit summary, it was only a temporary solution so that the information could be restructured and stripped of any unverifiable content. ~ Boomur [talk] 00:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
third opinion
hi, i just wanted to notify you that i opened a request for a third opinion on the above discussion so that we can resolve this debate without bias. ~ Boomur [talk] 01:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- Don't bother. I no longer wish to discuss this with you. ~ The Keymaster (talk) 01:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- And I will no longer revise this page...or any TMBG page, for that matter. Knock yourself out. ~ The Keymaster (talk) 01:50, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- i want to stress that i had absolutely no intention of deterring constructive edits, and i did not mean to contradict the factuality of your contributions — they are just not verifiable pieces of information. i truly hope that you will reconsider. it is important to mind Wikipedia policy (not that i'm an expert therein) when editing any part of the wiki...not only TMBG articles. i apologise for any misunderstanding or unintended hostility. ~ Boomur [talk] 01:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
3O Response: Sorry to see that Keymaster does not want to consider a 3O. It has been removed from the listing. (BTW, I am not watching this page or the article.) – S. Rich (talk) 06:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC) .
Just thought I'd mention this
Just thought I'd point out that the parenthetical "(Help is on its Way)" from "Hold on Girl" was added on the The ★ Collection: 25th Anniversary Edition album which was released in the United Kingdom. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 07:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I found that after some digging. However, one exception 25 years later isn't enough to change the title that has appeared on the vast majority of releases. - The Keymaster (talk) 07:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Spoilers
Please don't remove spoilers. Wikipedia isn't the IMDb, and we don't censor spoilers. See WP:SPOILER. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Dolby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 23
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Lane Smith (illustrator)
- Robert Margouleff
- added a link pointing to 3D
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Adios Amigos (Ramones album)
- added a link pointing to Brain Drain
- Astronauts & Heretics
- added a link pointing to Giant Records
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Campfire Songs: The Popular, Obscure and Unknown Recordings of 10,000 Maniacs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Smith.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cynthia Darlow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grease.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for December 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stuart Whitman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mesopotamia (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ricky Wilson.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mummer (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Sinclair.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recombo DNA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Myers.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cruel World Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love and Rockets.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Hack-O-Lantern
Hello, The Keymaster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hack-O-Lantern, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carl Graves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cashbox.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Changes (The Monkees album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Davy Jones.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)