User talk:Threeohsix/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Years

Why do you abbreviate years? I see no improvement in that. SLBedit (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Jogadores criados

Já dei uma olhadela em mais uns quantos tal como pediste.

Uma boa semana, saudações --84.90.219.128 (talk) 01:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Jorge Gonçalves Tavares

Olá,

achei este artigo enquanto inquiria da possibilidade do recentemente falecido antigo presidente do Sporting (em paz descanse) ter aqui página, não tem. Duas perguntas: 1 - penso que deve ser impossível (até porque actualizaste o artigo recentemente), mas não se achará nem que seja a data do falecimento do senhor? 2 - pela ligação exterior que agora adicionei à página (FORADEJOGO), vejo que ele marcou TRÊS golos num dos campeonatos em que, segundo reza a história do artigo, terá sido melhor marcador do Benfica (1924/25). Estará errado? Ninguém terá marcado mais do que três? Obviamente, não reverti nada, apenas deixo à tua consideração.

Cumprimentos, bom fim de semana --84.90.219.128 (talk) 17:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Não, o Almaneque apenas diz que faleceu, e como não é um jogador de destaque, mais complicado saber esses detalhes. Escrever um minimo de texto já é dificil. Eu vi pelas páginas do Almaneque relativo a cada época, e nessa época tem 4 e na seguinte 11.(Não te notifico porque não sei notificar IP's)--Threeohsix (talk) 17:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

E, mesmo que soubesses, os IPs não são notificados :) Qualquer dia, faço outra conta. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

GA

They're both very well-sourced and written, I just have a query about the statistics chart. Why are some players their full common name (e.g. Michael Thomas) and others just the surname (e.g. Poborsky)? Obviously, players who just use a nickname or their given names (Maniche, Ronaldo) are OK. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I've had articles pass GA after about 50 or so edits in the review, so even if it's not completely perfect now, there's still always a chance to pass. However, some reviewers believe this makes the article "unstable" and therefore worth failing '''tAD''' (talk) 18:35, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

@The Almightey Drill: Can you help me out and give a quick look at S.L. Benfica in European football, which I put up to peer review ?

Your GA nomination of 1999–2000 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1999–2000 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lemonade51 -- Lemonade51 (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1999–2000 S.L. Benfica season

The article 1999–2000 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1999–2000 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lemonade51 -- Lemonade51 (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Copy edit of 2001–02 S.L. Benfica season

Okay, finished with your copy edit request! As you said, the biggest thing here was readability; I just wanted to mention that I rewrote a lot of it to try to make it understandable to anyone who doesn't know anything about football, so you might want to read through it and double check that I didn't change any of the facts because I misread something, or that I didn't rewrite any significant technical terms. But it should be up to GAN quality now. —2macia22 (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@2macia22: Thanks for the work, I'll do that, but from a quick glance, nothing stands out.--Threeohsix (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Ajudinha

Bom, já fiz a parte portuguesa do "pacote" (dois, menos um que aqueles que o C.D. Tondela apresentou esta jornada no onze esta jornada, isto já mete nojo, são os grandes, os médios e os pequenos!), os brasileiros logo vejo. Penso que gostas da minha abordagem (nomes de clubes ao completo na história, determinada aprestentação das referências) porque continuas a pedir-me, e é assim que continuarei a fazer sempre.

Em relação ao José Carlos, tentei arranjar referências para o trabalho dele na Sport TV como já tinha feito com o Pedro Ricardo Quintela Henriques, nada feito. Estranho...

Saudações --84.90.219.128 (talk) 20:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

• Assim farei. Em relação a estilos cada um com o seu, mas eu odeio (e evito ao máximo) estar sempre a escrever palavras não-inglesas aqui (Taça de Portugal por exemplo, uma vez chega até porque é, vá-se lá saber porquê, o nome da competição aqui na WP), e não gusto de escrever work/publisher/newspaper porque as letras ficam tortas. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 21:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Este não tinha história, mas eu já te "poupei" o trabalho. Já só tens de adicionar umas referências em português, o resto já está. Cumprimentos. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

• Já dei um toque no Luís Carlos (Portuguese footballer). --84.90.219.128 (talk) 14:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Artur Castela

Please take a look at Artur Castela. SLBedit (talk) 02:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

@SLBedit: I have, needs work. WP:BEBOLD.--Threeohsix (talk) 11:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Gonçalo Quinaz

Boas, sem mais delongas aqui vai:

1 - parte técnica/gramatical, "simply known" seguido de DOIS nomes, não é correcto, isso é quando o jogador é conhecido pelo primeiro nome. Em Portugal, ganhou-se este costume de tratar todos os jogadores por dois nomes (e às vezes três, Nuno André Coelho; e ainda há as misturas idiotas de Pedro Pauleta ou Pedro Mantorras), mas é um mau costume;

2 - interesse enciclopédico: não me parece que a parte pessoal seja de interesse (porque fala daquele que anda em boca de - quase - todos 24 horas por dia? A tipa nem sequer tem artigo na WP). Claro que não tirei nada, mas vou investigar no WP:FOOTY (e tive que compôr, acho que um jogador que já ia em quase 100 jogos na 2ª divisão quando fizeste o artigo é mais conhecido por jogar à bola do que por ter andado com a namorada do outro, refiro-me ao "much more known").

Saudações, continuação de bom trabalho --84.90.219.128 (talk) 01:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Não disse o que disse com ânimo de ofender, mas se o meu caro não quer responder, nada posso fazer. Cumprimentos --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

• Obrigado, e eu não dei a entender que, por teres editado a página do Quinaz eras obrigado a responder-me, apenas queria saber a tua opinião mais nada, e peço desculpa se dou mais trabalho do que devia editando através de IP. Esqueci-me disto na mensagem original: podes retirar imensas (para não dizer quase todas) fichas de jogo da 2ª divisão das últimas seis, sete (mais coisa, menos coisa) épocas no Record, é muito melhor porque temos um artigo jornalístico escrito ao invés do ZEROZERO.pt, que não é visto com bons olhos pela WP já que é construído por usuários. Uma boa maneira de buscar no motor do próprio Record.pt seria por exemplo, no caso do Quinaz o resultado "União Madeira 3-2 D. Aves". --84.90.219.128 (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

E em relação ao nome, volto a reiterar: não é por uma cambada de jornalistas com pouca massa cinzenta não fazerem o seu trabalho (lembro-me de há três anos, na Sport TV, num Atlético Bilbau-Atlético Madrid, o "senhor" João Gonçalves dizer "Radamel Falcao Garcia" 30 ou 40 vezes, até fiquei parvo!) que devemos fazer o mesmo. Assim, num artigo como deve ser dizemos "Gonçalo Quinaz" quando apresentamos o sujeito, a seguir "Quinaz" chega. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 20:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Artigos sem texto

Meu caro,

disseste para eu te avisar se achasse jogadores do Benfica sem texto, aí tens uma boa aposta: Messias Timula, a única coisa que arranjei foi o Vedeta ou Marreta, onde diz que morreu da "doença da vida" (alcoolismo será? É o que deduzo, mas é muito vago). Acho que não há mais nada na net, e este tipo até jogou bastante na altura de um imperial Humberto Coelho e de um sólido Bastos Lopes, e (se fosse comigo não jogava, já sabes a minha opinião sobre naturalizados) até chegou à selecção.

Nesta fotografia do VOM (aqui http://vedetaoumarreta.blogspot.pt/2010_08_01_archive.html), sabes identificar toda a gente? Eu, da primeira fila (esquerda para a direita) conheço o Timula, Artur, Toni. Em baixo Nené, Jordão, Shéu e Moinhos. Quem são os outros, sobretudo aquele barbaças ao pé do Toni, que medo.

Saudações --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

• Obrigado pela melhoria/dica. E em relação aos jogadores do Benfica na foto, conheces os "em falta" ou não? --84.90.219.128 (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Ah, e estive a ler melhor a tua mensagem original. Nunca foi minha intenção fazer a abordagem de "este tipo do Benfica não tem texto nenhum, o TOS que faça", nem pensar. Só respondi ao apelo que tu me propuseste. Claro que podia ter sido eu a fazer, como já fiz muitíssimos. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:27, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

• Vou fazendo. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Benfica TV

Looks a lot better. I'm not familiar with the subject and don't know what's good to include or exclude, but I'm confident that the format is better. Nyttend (talk) 19:06, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Awards Winners listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Awards Winners. Since you had some involvement with the Awards Winners redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 06:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of awards and honours won by S.L. Benfica players while representing their national teams

The article List of awards and honours won by S.L. Benfica players while representing their national teams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable listcruft

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 20:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

No problems - I did consider asking you about deletion, but I don't think CSD#G7 (author requesting deletion) applies here because of it's age and the fact that a few other editors have also edited. No harm in letting the PROD expires. Cheers, GiantSnowman 08:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Jogadores do Benfica

Em primeiro lugar, bela vitória ontem, contra o Bragantino (DOIS portugueses ontem, o Benfica cinco! Parece que o Renato pegou de estaca com uma bela exibição). Em relação ao pedido, sabes porque é que eu deixei de editar no Benfica mas esqueceste-te o que é natural, já lá vai mais de um ano (refresca a memória aqui https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:188.81.115.107, não estou para levar com este energúmeno outra vez).

Posso dar uma vista de olhos nos emprestados (Djaló, S. Vitória, etc - ah, e aos antigos claro!), mas é só. Agradeço a tua compreensão, muito obrigado --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

• Começamos por este: ainda está emprestado ou já foi comprado pelo Farense? O ZEROZERO diz que não, mas como sabemos não é muito fiável... Na dúvida, deixei ficar. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Vou responder aqui, espero que depois vejas... O Harramiz mantém-se emprestado, o clube não disse nada como é normal em relação a estes jogadores insignificantes, mas a RTP é fiavel.--Threeohsix (talk) 18:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Obrigado. Também estive a compor agora o Steven Vitória, parece que está de regresso e sem o Luisão pode ter mais sorte desta vez (duvido, mas...). Se quiseres reverter isso porque não é oficial (também avisei o SLBedit sobre as minhas edições de agora), por favor reverte só isso, deixa o resto que bem me custou a limpar (o amigo ZmanUnion2010 estava imparável mas "ao contrário"!). --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Reverter o que? ele só foi emprestado até dezembro de 2015 e já foi noticiado que, regressou. O Vitória é ridiculamente mau, como vários dos quase 25!!! emprestados que o clube tem; com sorte rescinde e não sai muito caro.

Sim, sem dúvida não é nenhum Beckenbauer, apenas gostava de o ter visto com alguma continuidade no Benfica para aquilatar melhor da sua categoria, tu como adepto do clube que acompanha muito melhor a actualidade do mesmo que eu, saberás coisas que eu não claro, mas o SV do Estoril sempre me pareceu um jogador muitíssimo competente. Outro exemplo? O Henrique Sereno quando estava no Porto, será pior que o Marc(i)ano ou o Martins Indi? Se calhar, vai-se a ver e não...

Bom fim de semana (ah, e quando eu falava em reverteres-me - ou qualquer outro utilizador - sobre o retorno do Vitória ao Benfica, pensava que tal poderia acontecer por não ser ainda uma notícia 100% oficial, mas pela fonte que me mostraste já vi que é) --84.90.219.128 (talk) 09:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Record / Outros

Pois, já tinha reparado isso nas notícias antigas. Obrigado pela dica, bom sábado. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 19:57, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

• Aí tens uma boa oportunidade para brilhar, Miguel Lourenço. Duvido que se possa encontrar alguma coisa (talvez no almanaque?), é até bem provável que o senhor já tenha falecido, embora não completamente impossível que ainda esteja "entre nós". --84.90.219.128 (talk) 23:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the 2002–03 S.L. Benfica season page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the S.L. Benfica page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Fontes do Record

Obrigado pela tua opinião no WP:FOOTY, achei que não era preciso notificar-te directamente porque: 1 - ao realçar o teu nome de usuário, és notificado pelo computador; 2 - não estava "a dizer mal", assim por dizer.

Como não pesco nada destes aspectos técnicos, resolvi deixar à atenção do pessoal para ver se alguém conseguia arranjar o que está "estragado". Bom sábado --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Request to User:Mattythewhite

(In ENGLISH so that the user mentioned in title understands) I have already added a few things in your report about this "person" that only knows about the HATE part in football, quite quite sad... --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2002–03 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2002–03 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Almightey Drill -- The Almightey Drill (talk) 23:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Featured topics

Have you heard of Featured Topics?

2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season

3 articles

2002 FA Community Shield

2003 FA Cup final

If you also do Good Articles on Benfica matches, you can have a featured topic one day. '''tAD''' (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2002–03 S.L. Benfica season

The article 2002–03 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2002–03 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Almightey Drill -- The Almightey Drill (talk) 06:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

FL nomination limitation

Hi Threeohsix, I saw your two nominations at FLC; unfortunately only one new nomination is alloed at any one time. The blurb at the top of the page puts it clearly: "Users should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed". If you could let me know which one you wish to be withdrawn I will take the appropriate administrative steps. Thanks. - SchroCat (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

@SchroCat: I was made aware of that in here, and chose to keep the first nominee, List of S.L. Benfica players‎.--Threeohsix (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

OK, thanks. - SchroCat (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

FL nom

Sure, give me a day or two. Feel free to review Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Arsenal F.C. players (25–99 appearances)/archive1 if you have time. :) Lemonade51 (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2001–02 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2001–02 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2001–02 S.L. Benfica season

The article 2001–02 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2001–02 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

List of S.L. Benfica players

I've reverted and warned - if he reverts again I suggest you report at WP:ANI for a wider look, but do not revert him yourself. GiantSnowman 17:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosário (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Académica de Coimbra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Carlos Daniel

Uma pena, mas não consigo arranjar a referência para o recorde do rapaz. Vou ao motor de busca do Record (vê aqui se quiseres http://www.record.xl.pt/pesquisa.html?date_de=&date_ate=&filt=&range=custom&order=&page=1&pagres=10&type=tudo&pesquisa=uni%C3%A3o+leiria+recorde+carlos+daniel), e quando clico na notícia "Carlos Daniel: «Queria ser o mais jovem»", vai de volta para a página de início, já ontem me aconteceu, desisto. De pesquisa no SAPO, por exemplo, só arranjo um ou dois blogues, não dá aqui, uma enciclopédia.

Espero que esteja tudo bem contigo, dentro e fora da WP. Saúde. --Be Quiet AL (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

• @Be Quiet AL: O Record apagou imensas noticias assim, de clubes pequenos. Pelo menos não apagaram tudo. Mas tens aqui uma alternativa. Até fala na 1ª pessoa. Está tudo bem obrigado. Sáude e bom trabalho.--Threeohsix (talk) 08:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Vou já lá pôr. Muitíssimo obrigado! --Be Quiet AL (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S.L. Benfica in European football

The article S.L. Benfica in European football you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:S.L. Benfica in European football for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 10:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Template:S.L. Benfica Futsal 2009–10 UEFA Futsal Cup champions

No, it's also non-notable. I will take to WP:TFD in due course. GiantSnowman 17:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S.L. Benfica Futsal 2009–10 UEFA Futsal Cup champions

Template:S.L. Benfica Futsal 2009–10 UEFA Futsal Cup champions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GiantSnowman 19:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Diego Lopes

It's not relevant if Diego Lopes was ahead of Bernardo Silva. Who is Bernardo Silva? You could say, in Silva's page, that he lacked minutes in Juvenis, but it does not make sense talk about him in Diego's page.

Due to Cancelo being sold to Valencia, Nélson Semedo had more time. Does this info really matters? No. Neither does the fact that Bernardo Silva (who?) was second choice behind Lopes. P3DRO (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

P3DRO Do you want me to discuss it at WP:Football to help you understand footballers BLP's? I'll happily remove it if the consensus is that. --Threeohsix (talk) 20:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes. Don't get me wrong, I just think that information isn't relevant. Do you think it's so important to have something that says Diego Lopes was the first choice and some other kid was second choice? P3DRO (talk) 20:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Threeohsix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003–04 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2003–04 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003–04 S.L. Benfica season

The article 2003–04 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2003–04 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2004–05 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2004–05 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2008–09 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2008–09 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2004–05 S.L. Benfica season

The article 2004–05 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2004–05 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2008–09 S.L. Benfica season

The article 2008–09 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2008–09 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2007–08 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2007–08 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005–06 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2005–06 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2006–07 S.L. Benfica season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2006–07 S.L. Benfica season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2007–08 S.L. Benfica season

The article 2007–08 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2007–08 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005–06 S.L. Benfica season

The article 2005–06 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2005–06 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2006–07 S.L. Benfica season

The article 2006–07 S.L. Benfica season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2006–07 S.L. Benfica season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Benfica Juniors Notable Players

Hello Threeohsix.

I saw your comment on this talk page. I do not agree with the criteria. The concept of notable is ambiguous. What is a Junior notable player? A player who was notable in the Juniors? A player who is notable worldwide and played in the Juniors? Notable in Benfica's senior team? Chalana or Nené are indisputably notable players but Bernardo Silva is not. In Diego Lopes' page you talked about Silva. I think some Benfica supporters give too much credit to that player. Who is Bernardo Silva? He is a nobody in the history of Benfica. He played 31 minutes. My first idea was to add all the players that had played in the main team. But that criteria it's too wide. If the criteria needs to be tight I think players like Bernardo Silva cannot enter. I'm not criticizing your work but I think you overrate Silva.

Honestly, I think there will never be consensus. In my opinion, this section should not exist. Also, I don't have the time or the patience to have my edits reverted by some kid with identity crises who thinks he owns Benfica's related pages on Wikipedia and wants to have the last edit. You know whom I'm talking about. Cheers mate! P3DRO (talk) 16:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

P3DRO I didn't define what's notable because that's subjective, I just set a standard for inclusion after reading the discussion of the talk page. It's not about me rating Silva. Consensus couldn't be reached so I compromised, I added all ideas that were discussed. If consensus changes, so should the criteria. About Diego Lopes, I will work on that later. The other thing, maybe you should focus on other articles and avoid some articles, even if you think you could improve it. Aren't we just nerds spending our spare time for other people profit, do we need drama? --Threeohsix (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Eusébio

Hey 306. In finalball.com it says that Eusébio was the Goalkeeper Coach in the 89/90 season. You added that he was an assistant. I did not edit that because I don't know what information it says in Almanaque do Benfica. I don't know if it was a mistake or not. P3DRO (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

P3DRO I added what Diário de Lisboa said in the first reference, from 28 July 1989. I have the 1988-89 book Voo da Aguia and Eusébio it's just an assistant there, no goalkeeper coach. It's the same in book Benfica Campeão 93/94, where Bento it's the goalkeeper coach. From my understanding, after Bento's injury in 86, he pretty much coached Silvino or Neno himself. The best source is to have multiple sources and from the books I have that mention Eusébio post playing career, he first assisted in youth teams and then was assistant to multiple managers. I personally think other than the main assistant the rest is just trivia and wikipedia is already full of that. Also, please don't look for the 2014-15 seasons and following seasons as role-models for anything, they're really poor in content. The season articles aren't for Benfica fans, there are for everyone, so trivia should be kept at a minimum.--Threeohsix (talk) 14:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1960–61 S.L. Benfica season

added a link pointing to António Mendes

1961–62 S.L. Benfica season

added a link pointing to António Mendes

1986–87 S.L. Benfica season

added a link pointing to Alfredo Castro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

SWF22

 Done by another admin. GiantSnowman 18:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Álvaro Carolino

Olá, sou eu o AL, com o meu IP do trabalho,

este gajo é mesmo um bocado chatinho. Sim, eu sei que ele opera a 100% dentro das directrizes da WP, mas mesmo assim... Achas que consegues achar uma referência para os títulos deste jogador?

Se não se arranjar nada, e ele remover outra vez, eu pelo menos desisto. Boa semana --193.137.135.2 (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Eu vi mal, pensava que ele tinha jogado um tempo com o Benfica como sénior uns tempos, já vi melhor que não. Acho que não se arranja nada, sendo assim (tinha pensado em ti como tens acesso a almanaques antigos e assim), o GS que remova! --193.137.135.2 (talk) 09:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Good job in writing 1974–75_S.L._Benfica_season! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:08, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Federação Portuguesa de Andebol logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Federação Portuguesa de Andebol logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Nuno Santos (footballer, born 1973)

Olá, tudo bem? Espero que sim.

Achas que consegues algumas referências para a carreira deste jogador além daquela que lá puseste muito bem há uns anos (nem que seja só de algum almanaque do Benfica, melhor só referenciar a carreira dele lá do que nada. Tentei no "Record" e no "SAPO", nada)? O espertinho do costume tirou a história toda outra vez, comigo deu-se mal (eu até percebo este administrador, isto é uma enciclopédia e qualquer um pode escrever aquilo que lhe apetecer, mas até irrita às vezes!)...

Obrigado com o que se possa arranjar de antemão (se é que se pode), bom fim de semana --Quite A Character (talk) 16:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Quite A Character: Tens aqui uma entrevista que fala de toda a carreira.--Threeohsix (talk) 11:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

EXCELENTE! Vou lá pôr hoje à noitinha ou amanhã, sem falta. Muitíssimo obrigado --Quite A Character (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Liga Portuguesa de Andebol logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liga Portuguesa de Andebol logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Threeohsix. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Invitation from Wikimedia Portugal

(English below)

Olá. A Wikimedia Portugal é uma associação portuguesa sem fins lucrativos, fundada em 2009, reconhecida pela Wikimedia Foundation como "chapter" de Portugal. A nossa missão é, em geral, contribuir para a disseminação generalizada do saber e da cultura, através do incentivo à recolha e criação de conteúdos isentos de restrições de utilização, modificação e distribuição, e da difusão dos mesmos; e em particular, promover e apoiar os projetos da Wikimedia Foundation, entre os quais a Wikipédia, com ênfase para os projetos nas línguas faladas em Portugal, o português e o mirandês.

Gostaríamos de contar com o apoio de (e reciprocamente apoiar) todos os voluntários naturais, residentes ou simplesmente interessados em Portugal. Embora fundada em 2009, a associação teve um largo período de inatividade, que estamos agora a ultrapassar. Vimos por isso convidá-lo, caso nisso tenha interesse, a inscrever-se como associado da associação, demonstrar apoio à existência de um "chapter" em Portugal, e a envolver-se em atividades futuras inscrevendo-se na lista de distribuição de email. Recentemente, a Comissão de Afiliações da Wikimedia suspendeu o apoio à Wikimedia Portugal, pendente, entre outras coisas, do apoio da comunidade de editores portugueses. [1]

Agradecemos desde já!

Hi! Wikimedia Portugal is the Portuguese chapter of Wikimedia, founded in 2009 and recognized by the Wikimedia Foundation. Our mission is to contribute to the general dissemination of knowledge and culture through the incentive to the collection and creation of content without restrictions on use, modification and distribution, and promote their difusion; we promote and support the Wikimedia Foundation projects, among which Wikipedia, with emphasis on projects in Portuguese and Mirandese.

We would like however to count on the support of (and in turn ourselves support) all volunteers that are citizens, resident, or simply interested in Portugal. Despite being founded in 2009, the chapter has gone through a long period of inactivity that we are trying to overcome. We have sent you this message to invite you, if you are interested, to enroll as associate to the chapter, demonstrate your support to the existence of a chapter in Portugal, and get involved in the discussion of future activities by registering in the mailing list. Recentely, the Wikimedia Affiliations Committee suspended support to Wikimedia Portugal pending, among other things, the support from the community of portuguese editors. [2] GoEThe (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Threeohsix. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Patriotas F.C. has been nominated for discussion

Category:Patriotas F.C., which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fc paços de ferreira logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fc paços de ferreira logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Veríssimo

Benfica never said Veríssimo was a caretaker manager. SLBedit (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

List of Primeira Liga hat-tricks

Hi Threeohsix. Can you help me improve this page?P3DRO (talk) 12:17, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Campeonato Nacional Futebol Feminino logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Campeonato Nacional Futebol Feminino logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Campeonato Nacional Juniores logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Campeonato Nacional Juniores logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Portuguese Federation for Ice Sports.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Portuguese Federation for Ice Sports.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Xico Andebol logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xico Andebol logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Campeonato feminino logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Campeonato feminino logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)