User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive148

Dar Lyon

Any chance you could pop over and have a look at this article with your assessing/reviewing eyes for me? Harrias (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

I've made a few tweaks, and it is quite short for a guy who had 150 games and was a High Court official. I know he only averaged 30 and didn't score much, but why is it considered unlucky/dubious that he didn't get selected for Tests when he was a specialist batsman and averaged only 30 at FC, especially as with so many FC teams in England the talent is sometimes diluted and a lot of people can make colossal amounts of runs YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, your comments and tweaks are much appreciated (although I'm now having to go over all my other edits and fix the refs!) I agree that the page is quite short considering his career(s), but as I'm sure you can appreciate, it's hard going trying to find references for a lot of it. As regards his lack of Test selection, I'm basing this purely on the sources (Foot and Lawrence); clearly both are books about Somerset, and thus likely to be biased in his favour, but I speculate from what I have read that it was based on how he played as much, if not more, than how many he scored. Harrias (talk) 08:04, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Cricket chat

• Can you also revisit this? Your comments have been addressed. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 02:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes....I wonder why Dhoni wants to give Kohli more of a bat than Raina though. ???? YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 02:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

His batting orders are puzzling at times, he gets lucky quite often and gets away with it. With Sehwag falling early, Raina should have gone in after Tendulkar. Hope he goes with conventional wisdom today! -SpacemanSpiff 03:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Looks like he got lucky today. Although it's a tough choice between Raina and Yuvraj for the no 4 slot. I'd rather have Raina/4, Yuvraj/5 and Dhoni/6 instead of the current order, especially when two wickets fall before the tenth over. -SpacemanSpiff 16:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Raina is good at 15-over innings though, whereas with Yuvraj, the speedup he makes once he passes 80 odd is usually quite startling, often 170+ SR YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

MFD nomination of User:HarryAlffa/ArbCom

Hello, this page has been nominated for deletion. You may be interested in participating in the discussion, located here. Thanks, GlassCobra 18:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Nguyen Ton Hoan

On November 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nguyen Ton Hoan, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 14:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Virender Sehwag/archive3

Hi, I've tried to address your concerns at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Virender Sehwag/archive3 . Could you please revisit? Thanks Abeer.ag (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Done YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 02:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Sehwag FLC needs a revisit when you get the chance. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

YM, I will go ahead and promote the list tomorrow or Tuesday. If your concerns were resolved, great; if not, hopefully you can resolve them on the talk page. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Requesting your comment on an unblock request

Hi YellowMonkey, could you please comment on the unblock request at User talk:Tommy Nero Sullivan? I note that you were the blocking admin and that it is a checkuser block. It came to my attention because the person posting the unblock request included personal information in the request, which I've removed. Risker (talk) 03:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

It wasn't a CU block, the way it acts is just so obvious, considering that there are elss than 10 people who edit Vietnamese articles even a bit regularly. Same, borderline nn people, adding external links everywhere. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 01:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: AC

I was wondering recently if the case is being delayed on purpose till after the elections... but 6 weeks would make it 4 months, one of the longest cases in duration of Wikipedia. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Well not many of them are up at this election, perhaps the ones worrying about 2010? But if the ban is only 3 months anyone can come back and oppose soon after YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Virender Sehwag/archive3

Added a bit about the 319 being the largest. Please revisit. Abeer.ag (talk) 00:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I hope this sentence-by-sentence thing isn't a tactic YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 00:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

YellowMonkey, is the list there, or is there still some ways to go? I'm trying to decide whether it's worth keeping the FLC open until the weekend or not. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Well I added in the sentence that I asked him to add since he wasn't doing it, but I think I can add much more if I looked things up and researched it. I also left the link raw for him to fill out, but he hasn't done it, just said that it's done. I don't think that FLs should just be 2-hours of filling up the table and 1 token mechanical paragraph which is the same skeleton as for all players. In the case of Sehwag, he is generally regarded as the most swashbuckling batsman of the recent era, and as a result there is always more to the story than just racking up the runs. I dunno if you follow motor racing but he is entertaining like Juan Pablo Montoya, ultra-aggressive, and causes a few prangs whether or not he is successful. YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Cricket Lists

What "spree" is that?

Not sure if you're referring to my stuff-up this morning on the "List of Australia Test Cricket Records against India", or the change I made to Keith Miller. Or is there something else? I've got the Aus vs West Indies Test records ready for this afternoon. I've been producing these in time for each new Test series, so I guess I'll now have to get stuck into Pakistan and then New Zealand. No rest, etc etc.--Perry Middlemiss (talk) 02:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I was referring to the flurry of cricket lsits at WP:FLC and wondering if you were joining the party YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

No, hadn't even noticed. Stuck in my own little world I guess. Just plugging away. Wondering if I should be doing Test lists by venue after this. No, that way madness lies.--Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Check

Hey hey... Gtyagi60 (talk · contribs) seems to remind me another user very much. Could you please check it? I'm almost sure he is a sock of another account. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Which one? I can't just go on a publicly announced fishing expedition YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 05:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

See what he keeps adding to the Abhishek Bachchan article:

"Abhishek Bachchan is today widely perceived to be a moderately successful actor but one incapable of ensuring a movie's success on his own steam. The few successful movies he has appeared in have been in a supporting actor capacity, the only exception being the 2007 Guru."

This is untrue, and in addition to being nonsensical and stupid, it is unsourced, and the only source you can find is this bollywoodmantra.com (a completely unreliable source) film review, which proves absolutely nothing. He also accuses me of being a Pakistani/Bangladeshi and I don't understand his mentality. Don't mean to be rude, but this is an example of a real idiot. Could you help me with that? Shahid • ^Talk2me 23:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Reverted the BLP YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 00:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

TFA 11 Nov

G'day mate, was just checking the TFA queue/requests and surprised to see nothing in line for Rememberance Day, 11 November. It occurred to me that Arthur Henry Cobby would be a natural, seeing as he was a great figure of World War I and he died on that day. It'd pick up a point for me not having had a TFA before as well but not sure if it'd garner anything more - think it's worth a shot? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Heh, didn't look up high enough on the TFAR talk page to see 11 Nov was being discussed so mentioned it there as well... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:56, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Tks for support mate, unfortunately as I was about to officially nom it on TFAR I noticed on the TFA queue that Raul had just filled the slot for 11 Nov (nothing WWI-related however). Left a msg on his talk page suggesting reconsideration so I think I've done all I can for the moment... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, hopefully he responds. He's been rather taciturn since the ArbCom court martialed and reduced him to the ranks by removing his CU and OS tools YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 00:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK

I had a DYK attempt. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 22:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

They usually don't accept straight forks. If you collate from lots of articles and mix it up a bit, but in this case, I doubt they will let you, especially as a lot of the article wasn't sourced when I added stuff in there. YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

FA discussion

You might be interested in this. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

• And it's gonna take me 4 years to plow through ten of them, because someone added some stupid rule that you can only nominate one at a time. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

• That's not the way it works, TPH. If you have a FAR nom that is well into the process, with consensus forming or nothing happening, then you can add another as long as you don't abuse and the page isn't backlogged. What you can't do is load them up, back to back. And nomming an article with no problems, without consulting the article talk, isn't good practice :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

If you pick the really neglected ones, where the authors and the wikirpoject are gone, then they will cruise through in four weeks, and because you can add another if the first is winding down in three weeks, usually. If the author is still active or the project is robust, then they might fix it and it lasts 2 months, so the talk page might be useful that way, but it is true that many only care for the star and will do the least possible and will do nothing to keep improving the article once it passes until/unless it gets FARed and put under the hammer. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 00:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

You mean really neglected articles from really neglected projects like this one? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:11, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

YM, TenPoundHammer just put up another nom, only seven days after his last nom, and after we've both explained the one nom rule to him, and I have twice removed a nom he made of an article that has no problems. [1] I am not going to revert him for the third time, but he doesn't seem to be listening. His first nom needs to get further along before he adds another. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

I asked him to wait until the FARC, which should only be next week. Canada and some of the others at the bottom of the pre-FARC could do with some eyes YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 01:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

I promised Marskell days (weeks?) ago I would get over there, and I still hope too <sigh>. I don't want to revert TPM for the third time; I've left a note on his talk, but he doesn't seem to be listening. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

FLC

Can you add comments here -- India women ODI FLC? Looks like there are too many cricket lists, so no one's commenting. Did you watch the game? Very Tendulkarish, didn't watch, just followed on cricinfo. -SpacemanSpiff 01:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Very harsh, but all he had to do was stay in and India would have won comfortably. 19 from 18 balls with 4 wickets is easy now days. Silly paddle shot, I don't think he played it all innings - great knock though. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 01:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Nobody comments on the FACs either. No I didn't watch, I don't have Pay TV, I did see snippets on the news of Munaf bowling very slowly and lethargically and a stack of short balls that barely got to groin height and were easily pulled away by Watson and Marsh. Very poor. Interesting that Dhoni doesn't trust Jadeja too much, promoting Harbhajan ahead of him. :( YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 01:21, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Nobody comments on the FACs either, per comments about the Fourth Test above, and hopefully the two remaining GAs for the featured topic don't sit there for three months. No I didn't watch, I don't have Pay TV, I did see snippets on the news of Munaf bowling very slowly and lethargically and a stack of short balls that barely got to groin height and were easily pulled away by Watson and Marsh. Very poor. Interesting that Dhoni doesn't trust Jadeja too much, promoting Harbhajan ahead of him. The ABC usually buy the rights to ODIs in England and NZ, sometimes South Africa, but it appears that in those countries the radio rights are given to the public broadcaster on the cheap. Maybe in India the BCCI sells them very expensively as I think a lot more would be interested in India ODIs, as they are stronger. Still, the local radio had about 20-minute score updates, among the guy's weekly chat with a US woman in NY for the weekly happensings he kept on saying "India are up to 300, 310,..." she couldn't believe the amount of runs. I don't know why people like SRT and Rohit like to paddle scoop so much, with these modern bats, even a mishit has a good chance of a six. Rohit expecially hits lots of 4/6 in the V then he tries reverse/addle sweep and gets out. Only hopeless players like Uthappa who can't play should use the paddle scoop repeatedly. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 01:21, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Bowling still pretty awful though. India can't win the WC with this Real Madrid style situation of all these destructive batsmen and straw-strength bowling/defending/fielding. They can't rely on 380+ [4 goals] each game... YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 01:21, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

BCCI must charge a lot for radio coverage. I remember ABC didn't cover the SL series in 2004 because of budget issues. The Olympics and India Tests were on later that year. Nehra is a dreadful fielder, luckily Ponting took the powerplay after 34 overs, despite getting out Aus scored 45 and continued on from there. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 01:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Radio commentary within India is "free rights" to All India Radio as a public service and mandated by the govt. Not sure about overseas rights though. Watching games here in the US is pretty expensive, don't even get the pay stream on Cable, need satellite. Alternative is willow.tv but then it's PC only (no mac) and the streaming quality isn't always great. Was surpised by Harbhajan going ahead of Jadeja too, I also stand by my earlier position fo Raina going in at 4, Yuvi's good at that spot when he gets going, but... Munaf's bowling is kinda peaks and valleys, you hardly know if it's the same guy on different days, not much esle to choose from. For this game, he could have given Sachin or Sehwag a couple of overs, especially as there's hardly a chance it could've gotten any worse. -SpacemanSpiff 02:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

I'd take Sreesanth anyday. No need for depressing lazy players who don't care. A bit of random energy is better in any circumstances. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 03:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

• I made some transcription errors on the list, just found them and fixed them, but feel like an ass all the same. Since you've already commented here, I'm letting you know should you want to revisit. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 19:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Referencing magazine

While I'm firing away, how do you reference out of a magazine? What template do you use? I've never cam across it before and I'm going to add a bit about Paine. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

{{Cite journal}} is what I've seen used, and have since used it for magazines. Has all the necessary fields including ISSN and OCLC. BTW, in your "My preferences" -> "Gadgets" there's a "ref tools" option, which will give you a "Cite" button above your edit window, and you can fill in the fields automatically. -SpacemanSpiff 03:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 04:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

It has all the months and volume numbers as well YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 06:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem, Raman Lamba

Hi. After your cleanup of this article, it seems several paragraphs of text from that copyrighted source still remained. I don't see any indication that we've received permission? I've gone ahead and removed the rest of the pasted text from the article, since obviously we can't publish copyrighted work without it. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing. I should've have come back and done the rest. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

• Fundraiser: Controversial "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser to start 10 November

• New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol

• German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists

• Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris

• Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November

• Book review: Review of Connected Minds, Emerging Cultures: Cybercultures in Online Learning

• News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more

• In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more

• Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

mail

sent u a mail. --CarTick 02:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh, the sig, I forgot about the username change. Should be gone in two minutes YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 02:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Take a look?

YM, Anas999 (talk · contribs) is a disruptive editor, quite a bit of page move vandalism, changed a school article to that of another school and moved it today, moved an existing article Khurai to a "rural" title and created an alternate article. I've been cleaning up after this chap for a while, and it's getting to be a pain. Also, there's some deeper connection with Wikindia24x7 (talk · contribs) who is more troublesome in the kind of pages/categories/redirects created, I've grown tired of leaving warnings there. Could be a sock as Wikindia created the user page for Anas. Can you take a look? I've also tagged a few redirects for deletion, cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 03:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, only one user to clean up after! cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 06:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Sam Loxton

Not sure if you noticed, but I finished up the review a few hours ago. Cheers,--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 03:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Passed, needs alt text though. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 04:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Two to go :) Whats the next FAC? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 08:09, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Fourth Test I see. Hopefully York Park will pass. Already go a support. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 08:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I had Ton That Dinh too, pretty sparse. Went back to YP. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 00:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll get to fourth Test eventually, doubt it will get many reviewers. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 01:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Viet districts

Just a few for Ho Chi Minh City I think, are you still working on the districts? Himalayan 13:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

There are a few others too, in the provinces. I checked {{Districts of Southeast Vietnam}} and most of these are empty and I suspect some other regions as well YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 00:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

No. You are wrong. If you'd checked Districts of Southeast Vietnam you'd have seen I had started ploughing through those yesterday. Your "suspicion" about me not having bothered to do the other regions is wrong. I spent a lot of time adding data to most of them back in February-March. It was around the time of my grandmother's funeral and I got distracted from completing the last region, the southeast and forgot about it.. Sorry Himalayan 11:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

No worries, I should have them all covered now. If not, then give me a bell. I still intend to work on the district and add maps, although I also have Laos districts to try to expand too. Regards. Himalayan 13:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Hassett

Talk:Lindsay Hassett/GA1 Will read through later. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm hoping Fowler wasn't being serious? India Talk Page. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Just sarcasm. Fowler's a regular POV chopper from what I've seen (never interacted with him though). -SpacemanSpiff 03:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Not giving helping the IP in the future though. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

It's actually an indef blocked editor trolling the page - User:ARYAN818. Keeps coming back on many India related pages with such posts, regulars generally know who it is.-SpacemanSpiff 06:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Aryan is easily ignored. Yes, Fowler can be quite sardonic YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 06:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, one league article had many non notables thrown in at one stage. What's the point of having the bit as it will become fan crufty one day. [2] Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Decided to clear out the backlog yourself? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 06:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

By myself, no YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 20:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Music of Minnesota

Yikes. That's by far the most maintenance tags I've ever sprinkled on one article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:48, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

What about Louisville, Kentucky YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Sehwag

I was reading through WP cricket archives, and I was amazed to see how your writing on Sehwag was described as "dry"! Lol, there's hope for me yet. ;) Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 10:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

It was very dry. If you don't use books, or don't have them, they will be very statty. It still is rather dry. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Ooops... my bad. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 05:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Drone attacks in Pakistan

Could you please unprotected this article? If not please let me know why at the articles talk page [3]. Cheers IQinn (talk) 07:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

It's because of the banned user Nangparbat, right below YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Nangparbat?

Hi YellowMonkey! Could you look into this? I think this is Nangparbat again. Same IP range and pro-Pakistani stance.

86.154.149.221 (talk · contribs)

Thanks. Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 19:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

86.150s with the usual POV are always him. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Again thanks. Haven't dealt with him in a while. So I thought I'd ask you first. I've gone ahead and reverted their edits since basically every single one of them is the usual POV for Pakistan and anti-Indian push. Knowing him, he'll probably look at my contribs tomorrow, revert them back, and cause disruption again. If it's possible, would you mind semi-protecting Geography of India, Eight-thousander, and K2? Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 04:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

All donje YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 20:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

And again with these pages. Indian Army, Sino-Indian War, and Nanga Parbat (quite funny how he's editing this page though). Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 15:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Yep done YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 22:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again. Also how bout this user? Same liking for for disputed Indian and Pakistani territories Kashmir and the usual language I know he uses.

Billy607 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).

Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 13:35, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

CU says Bingo YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 16:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Four Award

As a past WP:FOUR awardee you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Four Award.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Noted YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Roosters

Surely everyone will have different opinions on whose notable? Agree that the list isn't viable or needed. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 05:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Done Hassett, those that were lsited. Were you looking at the body as well? or nothing of note there? YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 05:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

No haven't read. Will do when I get the chance, busy at the moment. Also, why did you revert Jeff's edits. Surely this will get you into trouble. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 06:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries by Adam Gilchrist‎ Your info not appreciated. Lol! Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I think I'd have been better off not expanding Gilly and Tiger, frankly. From TRM's comments on his talk about errors "now present", I think I'd rather stay away. It's easier that way. If I don't speak up, Brianboulton sees all the cricket FAs nowadays anyway. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 09:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Why? You improved Gilly and Tiger a lot. Interesting that Moondyne (Ian) was often at WP cric in its early days, so was Nichalp. I didn't think they had much to do with cricket. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, sometimes when you go and clean up a house, other people resent it, because implicitly they might take it as an implicit message that they maintained a dirty house. I know a few people who get angry when other people in the house take it upon themselves to tidy things. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 09:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Plz continue fixing my messes! Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

It's not a big deal. It doesn't take a guy to explicitly get angry on a FAC or whatever to know that on average a person would feel more relaxed or happier with a straight support. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 09:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I should probably start doing Hassett! Nearly there... Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Expanded Michael Slater. Nothing about his career as yet. Couldn't believe how poor the article was! Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)'

Also, won't be on until after 6. Will put some Hassett stuff on then. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 20:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Quite a few long term 1980s-1990s Test players are very undeveloped: Gillespie, McDermott, Boon, M Hughes some more YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 01:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Boon is ok. Easier to write when you have a book. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 02:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I know, but heaps of people never research properly, only google whatever and say they're done for FA YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 03:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, Didn't know RM did Tiger until I checked the contribs. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 03:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

The Angry ghost that added the religious infighting was me YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 03:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Thought you opposed Hawkeye! When I saw you contributed in opposes. Great editor Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 04:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Will add/finish the rest tomorrow. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 08:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)