User talk:Dominic Edward Aragon

Proposed deletion of Mesa View Elementary School

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mesa View Elementary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to St. Teresa of Avila Catholic School, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Channel ® 21:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Booch method. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ——Ryan | t • c 21:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mesa View Elementary School

I have nominated Mesa View Elementary School, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesa View Elementary School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Dominic Edward Aragon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! DoubleBlue (Talk) 11:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion of Image:Favre 1996.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Favre 1996.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Favre 1996.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –King Bee ^{(τ • γ)} 11:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Brett Favre worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –King Bee ^{(τ • γ)} 11:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Joe Greene 2006.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Joe Greene 2006.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Joe Greene 2006.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –King Bee ^{(τ • γ)} 11:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of material

You seem to be going through articles and removing mention of people being Roman Catholic, yet you provide no explanation for your edits. Please stop, unless you have valid reasons for these removals, and properly note them. Thank you. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 14:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I misread your edits. You seem to be adding the fact that people are Roman Catholic. I presume, given our guidelines for biographies, that you have citable evidence to confirm your additions. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 14:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Coca Cola 2008 crash.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Coca Cola 2008 crash.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 14:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:100 4165.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:100 4165.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 14:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Joe Greene 2006.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Joe Greene 2006.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your message

Regarding your e-mailed message to me: "Hey, what the heck, dont mess with the "St. Teresa of Avila Catholic School" article. You never went to St. Teresa and im sure you are not Catholic. It is part of the article. Thank you.". First, you don't own that article. Second, any religious beliefs or affiliations I have are irrelevant and not appropriate for you to bring up. Third, we have standards for what to include in this encyclopedia and this article must adhere to them. Thank you. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 11:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now received a 2nd uncivil e-mail from you. Let me repeat: you don't WP:OWN that article, and a lengthy biography of the current principle (whether retiring or not, whether your grandfather or not) is not appropriate. This is an encyclopedia, not a place for you to include a personal tribute. If you insert this material again, you risk being blocked from editing for disruption. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 16:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on St. Teresa of Avila Catholic School. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 16:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St. Teresa of Avila Catholic Church

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article St. Teresa of Avila Catholic Church, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ZimZalaBim ^talk 16:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ZimZalaBim ^talk 23:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to St. Teresa of Avila Catholic School. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Again, no not cut/paste copyright-protected material into articles. ZimZalaBim ^talk 12:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Jr. Flat Charlotte.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jr. Flat Charlotte.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cibola County Beacon

A tag has been placed on Cibola County Beacon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. llamadog903 (talk) 22:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jr. Flat Charlotte.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jr. Flat Charlotte.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barney Visser

You're welcome for expanding the article. You had a good start, and you had found an excellent source with the Denver newspaper source. I used that source to expand the article, and I kept finding other sources when searching the internet. Royal broil 19:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jr._Flat_Charlotte.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jr._Flat_Charlotte.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sadler crash.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sadler crash.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:Busch 2008 Nationwide car.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Busch 2008 Nationwide car.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Sadler 2003 crash.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sadler 2003 crash.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Busch 2008 Nationwide car.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Busch 2008 Nationwide car.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Busch 2008 Nationwide car.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Melesse (talk) 20:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Sadler 2003 crash.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Sadler 2003 crash.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Sadler 2003 crash.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Melesse (talk) 20:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admins

In reply to this (unsigned) comment: Administrators are not compensated or centrally located. Admins are just like any regular editor, but they have simply been granted extra admin duties & abilities after discussion and voting by other editors. See WP:ADMIN for more info. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 16:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NASCAR 2004

Hello there. Lists of drivers are not appropriate for NASCAR articles, per WP:GAMETRIVIA item 6 and WP:NOT. Please don't revert again without further discussion. Thanks! Fin ©™ 20:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I again suggest you read WP:GAMETRIVIA and WP:NOT. There is existing consensus not to include a list of drivers in each NASCAR article (it began with this bit on the 09 talk page). Just because something has a big role does not necessarily mean it is notable enough for inclusion, the same logic applies to something that "is part of a game". Please read the articles I've linked to. Thanks! Fin ©™ 20:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Em, why does it matter if I'm an admin or not? Fin ©™ 20:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not claiming ownership, I am simply advising you of existing policies and consensus. Please read them. Also, proclaiming ownership is wrong, regardless of the user being an admin or not. Fin ©™ 22:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Please read the policies I've linked to and cease your reverting of NASCAR 2004. Consensus already exists not to include the drivers. I've already linked to each policy that applies, please read them. Thanks! Fin ©™ 23:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello yet again. I noticed this bit on ZimZalaBim's talk page, when I'd a look after he stepped in on the article: "tell...the "soundtrack" on the article had been there for a long time, until he came along and deleted it? ". The fact it had been there for a long time has absolutely no bearing on whether it should be removed. I suggest you have a look at (along with the other pages I've mentioned) wikipedia's list of policies, as you'd be a better editor for it. Thanks! Fin ©™ 00:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Em, no, I am not stalking you, I saw ZimZalaBim had reverted you on the NASCAR 2004 page here and went to his user and talk page to see who he was. I saw your contribution and thought it apt to point out that the length of time content has been on an article is not a consideration when removing it - the question was directed at me through him anyway ("would you be able to tell"), so I thought I might aswell answer it directly. Thanks! Fin ©™ 01:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Falcon9x5 may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks! Fin ©™ 22:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on NASCAR Thunder 2004. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 23:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to New Mexico. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 06:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blake Chanslor

Please don't start new articles by just copying sections from existing articles, as you did with Blake Chanslor, which simply was material copied from Blake's Lotaburger. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2070s

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2070s. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not an admin

I noticed that earlier today, you added a userbox to your page saying that you're an admin. Claiming user rights that you don't have is a bad idea. I'd recommend taking that userbox off, and instead adding one of these instead:

{{admin hopeful 2}}

{{User wikipedia/Administrator someday}}

which, respectively, become:

This user is not a Wikipedia administrator but would like to be one someday.

That way, you'll avoid giving the wrong impression. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 23:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Dominic Edward Aragon. You have new messages at DoriSmith's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Civility, edit warring, etc

Regarding this edit:

Please be civil. Your language and tone is inappropriate.
Don't continue to edit war as you are at NASCAR Thunder 2004‎. Discuss the disupted edit on the article's talk page. If you continue with this activity, you risk being blocked.
Don't leave new messages in a talk page archive. Use the talk page itself.

Thanks. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 01:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just seconding this notice. Also, just because other sports games have soundtracks does not mean the NASCAR articles should. I don't think I'm professing ownership of the article, I'm just keeping up with existing consensus and policies, something I've already linked to on this talk page. Please read them, this is the fifth time I've asked you. Thanks! Fin ©™ 10:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia etiquette

It is considered highly improper in our community to attempt to reveal the identities of editors who have chosen to remain anonymous. I'm assuming that you are unaware of our policies in that regard. Please do not continue to pry into other user's offline identities, as you appear to have been doing at User talk:ZimZalaBim. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 01:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Out of courtesy, please don't edit my main userpage. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Favre

Look at the talk page of Brett Favre as to why dates in titles are fairly pointless, especially in the future, because nobody will really remember what happened in the year 2007 in terms of football. More importantly, it really isn't consistent with the rest of the section titles in the article. Please join the discussion on the talk page over there. I wont revert though, because a discussion is warranted first. -Inzweep (talk) 16:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Dominic, do u own the stteresacatholicschool.synthasite.com website? - 207.108.253.126 (talk) 02:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Using your userpage as your homepage

You've indicated that you have created this site for your school. It appears that you are directing people who visit that site to leave messages on your Wikipedia user talk page if they want to get in contact with you. Please note that your user talk page is meant for communication regarding the Wikipedia project, and it is not meant to be used as your own homepage or place to receive non-Wikipedia related communication. I strongly suggest you change that link from the external website. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.(Planecrash111 (talk) 01:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Dominic, What Did We Say...

...about putting past winners of NASCAR races into future NASCAR race pages?

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NoseNuggets (talk) 9:40 AM US EDT Sept 8 2008

The past winners are listed on the main Las Vegas 400 page. There is no need to put them onto the 2009 Las Vegas 400 page. And as such, you are being reported to the supervisors for that comment about "chicken nuggets" as well. NoseNuggets (talk) 8:40 AM US EDT Sept 9 2008.

Consider this your final warning, after what you did to the 2008 Ford 400.

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to 2008 Ford 400. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NoseNuggets (talk) 2:39 PM US EDT Sept 12 2008

NoseNuggets is a well-respected editor at Wikipedia even if he/she is not an administrator. Administrative rights are not a big deal, and well-respected editors are expected to give warnings such as this. Administrators are selected by the community to deal with tasks that are too dangerous for an average contributor to do, such as block users, delete pages, protect pages from edit warring. What Nose is saying is that consensus (see WP:CONSENSUS) says that editors should not be added former winners for a race into future race articles. I do agree with that consensus. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a statistics database , and there are plenty of other options available to readers to find out those statistics. Adding content to articles when you know that it is contrary to consensus is considered disruptive (see Wikipedia:DISRUPT#Definition_of_disruptive_editing_and_editors / Rejects community input) and it can get you blocked. You've received plenty of warnings and you better heed them. Royal broil 05:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Herbert (Family Guy). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Throttle (film). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. the plot summary you posted appears to be a copyright violation of text from here. ZimZalaBim ^talk 23:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Grants High School. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Wally Dallenbach TNT 2009.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wally Dallenbach TNT 2009.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 00:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image is non-free. Non-free images may only be used within the strict confines of our non-free content criteria. This image was tagged as it lacked a non-free use rationale- an explanation of how it meets those policies. After reviewing the image and article, I can assure you that it does not meet those guidelines, as it is adding nothing to the page, and can easily be replaced by free images- there already are free images on the page. As such, I recommend you remove the image from the article and wait for it to be deleted. J Milburn (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read the non-free content criteria, and our non-free content guidelines generally. Basically, a screenshot could never be used for a driver who is still alive, as that would be replaceable- someone could just come along and take a free picture. For a driver who is dead, and of whom there are no free pictures, a single non-free picture for the infobox would usually be acceptable. J Milburn (talk) 12:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Mike Joy.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mike Joy.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 01:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Jeremy Mayfield 2009 car.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jeremy Mayfield 2009 car.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:John Andretti 2009 Windows World 34 car at Bristol.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:John Andretti 2009 Windows World 34 car at Bristol.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Sam Hornish 09 Phoenix.jpg 2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Sam Hornish 09 Phoenix.jpg 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Wave Energy Drink

I have nominated Wave Energy Drink, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wave Energy Drink. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised that someone has nominated the product for deletion, especially a nationally produced product (I assume). I usually deal with biographies. The general notability (WP:NOTE) would probably apply. You need to find at least 2 (but 5 is much better) reliable sources that describe the product, and these sources need to be independent of the product (not from the marketing department). So this is excellent, this one too, this is an okay source for the NASCAR info, very good, a GOLDEN source from a business magazine. I found these all in the first 2 pages on google. Other golden sources would be Time magazine, NY Times.com (very searchable), etc. Here's an excellent article from the Wikipedia Signpost on the topic. So this should be an easy article to save. That's probably why no one has voted to delete it! Royal broil 01:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Thedarxide (talk) 20:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Wave_Energy_Can.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wave_Energy_Can.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dominic Edward Aragon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Frank Stoddard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chris Luzar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Skip Manning - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cibola County Beacon

The article Cibola County Beacon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bob Pockrass

The article Bob Pockrass has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 08:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dominic Edward Aragon

Thank you for creating Modey Hicks.

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I don't see a strong case for notability here. While he is the mayor, that doesn't automatically guarantee notability. The article needs references that have significant coverage about the subject that are reliable and, importantly, independent of the subject or where he works.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 04:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Modey Hicks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Modey Hicks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modey Hicks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jenna Fryer

The article Jenna Fryer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jenna Fryer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jenna Fryer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Jordan (NASCAR reporter) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jerry Jordan (NASCAR reporter), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Melillo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Justin Melillo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Utter moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jim Utter, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Gluck moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jeff Gluck, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Melillo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not create articles unless you have multiple reliable sources (no, personal Twitter/Facebook accounts don't count) so that you are confident the subjects pass WP:GNG. Thanks, Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dominic Edward Aragon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Justin Melillo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please refrain from writing about topics with which you have a close connection with, such as website co-writers. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dustin Long (NASCAR writer)

The article Dustin Long (NASCAR writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of meeting WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 22:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jenna Fryer

Hello, Dominic Edward Aragon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jenna Fryer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.