996 working hour system
This article is missing information about background on other (especially non-tech) overwork cultures in China; legitimized “special work hour” system in Shenzhen.(July 2021) |
996 working hour system | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese | 996工作制 | ||||||
|
The 996 working hour system (Chinese: 996工作制) is a work schedule practiced by some companies in the People's Republic of China. It derives its name from its requirement that employees work from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm, 6 days per week; i.e. 72 hours per week.[1][2][3][4][5][6] A number of Mainland Chinese internet companies have adopted this system as their official work schedule. Critics argue that the 996 working hour system is a violation of Chinese Labour Law and have called it "modern slavery".[7][8]
In March 2019, an "anti-996" protest was launched via GitHub.[9][10][11] In 2021, an academic study by Chinese institutions recognized the existence of "excessive-work cultures like '996'" for the first time.[12]
Background
The culture of overtime work has a long history in Chinese IT companies,[13] where the focus is typically on speed and cost reduction.[14] Companies employ a range of measures, such as reimbursing taxi fares for employees who remain working at the office late into the night, to encourage overtime work.[15]
Long time working system brings various diseases and mental disorders to Chinese workers. It is estimated that more than three-quarters of urban workers in big cities like Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou suffer from work-related fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, sleep[16] or eating disorders, occupational stress, and work-family imbalance.[17] According to China's state-owned media People's Daily, a 2013 survey showed that 98.8% of Chinese IT industry workers said they had health problems.[18][19] Numerous overwork deaths and suicides have occurred during past decades due to the 996 system and other overtime working system in China.[20][21]
In 2020, a study found that "Chinese businesses are more likely to follow long work hours than American ones".[22] Another study likened 996 culture to "modern slavery", formed through the combination of "unrestricted global capitalism and a Confucian culture of hierarchy and obedience".[7] In 2021, for the first time, a Chinese study recognized the existence of "excessive-work cultures like 996" to an extent that, if not corrected, it can dilute the gains from China's dual circulation policy.[12]
Relevant legislation
The Labour Law of the People's Republic of China states:[improper synthesis?]
Chapter 4 Article 36 The State shall practise a working hour system wherein labourers shall work for no more than eight hours a day and no more than 44 hours a week on an average.[23]
Article 41 The employer can prolong work hours due to needs of production or businesses after consultation with its trade union and labourers. The work hours to be prolonged, in general, shall be no longer than one hour a day, or no more than three hours a day if such prolonging is called for due to special reasons and under the condition that the physical health of labourers is guaranteed. The work time to be prolonged shall not exceed, however, 36 hours a month.
Article 44 The employer shall pay labourers more wage remunerations than those for normal work according to the following standards in any one of the following cases:
(1) Wage payments to labourers no less than 150 percent of their wages if the labourers are asked to work longer hours; (2) Wage payments to labourers no less than 200 percent of their wages if no rest can be arranged afterwards for the labourers asked to work on days of rest; (3) Wage payments to labourers no less than 300 percent of their wages if the labourers are asked to work on legal holidays.
Chapter 12 Article 90 If the employer prolongs work hours in violation of stipulations in this Law, labour administrative departments can give it a warning, order it to make corrections, and may impose a fine thereon.
Article 91 The employer involved in any one of the following cases that encroach upon the legitimate rights and interests of labourers shall be ordered by labour administrative departments to pay labourers wage remunerations or to make up for economic losses, and may even order it to pay compensation:
(2) Refusal to pay labourers wage remunerations for working longer hours;
Companies involved
58.com
In September 2016, the classified advertising website 58.com officially declared its adoption of the 996 working hour system,[24] attracting criticism from employees and social commentators. The company responded that the 996 system would be an encouraged, not compulsory, practice.[25][26]
ByteDance
A CNBC article in May 2021 reported that workers at TikTok's parent company ByteDance were unhappy with the 996 work culture there and that people were turning down job opportunites at TikTok because of it.[27] In November 2021, ByteDance moved away from 996 and mandated somewhat shorter working hours.[28] Nevertheless, on 23 February 2022, the sudden death was reported of a 28-year-old employee at ByteDance, after he posted a message on Maimai, a career and social networking platform, the night before. ByteDance later issued a statement that was shared in an internal letter with its staff in China, according to which the employee felt dizzy after an hour of exercise at the company gym, before he was taken to the hospital. The incident raised scrutiny of the frequent overtime demands of Chinese tech companies.[29]
JD.com
After 58.com's 996 schedule was made known to the public, an internal email from the vice-president Gang He (Chinese: 何剛) of JD.com was leaked online, which contained a demand for the management team of JD.com to implement the 996 working hour system "on a flexible basis".[30]
On 15 March 2019, an employee of JD.com alleged that some departments have begun implementing the 995 schedule (9am-9pm, but 5 days per week), while other departments have already finished doing so. Following the report, the public relations department of JD.com announced that overtime work was not compulsory.[31]
Richard Liu, the founder of the company, referred to people complaining about the work schedule as "slackers".[32]
Pinduoduo
In early January 2021, the e-commerce platform Pinduoduo was accused of forcing its employees to do extremely intensive overtimes, which supposedly led to the karoshi death of a 22-year-old worker.[33][34] Later, the official account of Pinduoduo posted (but deleted shortly afterwards) an answer on Zhihu, saying "Those who are at the bottom of the society earn their wages at the risk of losing their lives".[35]
Just a few days after the early January accident, another employee committed suicide by jumping.[36][37] On January 10, news sources reported that Pinduoduo fired an employee who posted photos showing his colleague being carried into an ambulance.[38][39]
Youzan
In January 2019, an employee of Youzan stated on the social platform Maimai that their supervisor had enforced the 996 schedule.[40] Bai Ya, the CEO of Youzan, replied, "it would be a good thing to look back at a few years later".[15] Some media outlets criticized this schedule.[41] Later that month, the Labour Supervision Group of Xihu District, Hangzhou announced that the company was under investigation.[42]
Others
At least 40 companies, including Huawei, Pinduoduo, and Alibaba Group, have implemented the 996 schedule or an even more intensive alternative.[43][44]
Online protests
996.ICU GitHub campaign
On 26 March 2019, the 996.ICU repository and website were created. The repository on GitHub states that the name "996.icu" refers to how developers who work under the 996 system (9AM–9PM, 6 days per week) would risk poor health and a possible stay in an intensive care unit. The movement's slogan is "developers' lives matter".[45][46][47][48][49][50][51]
Two days later, on 28 March 2019, the repository had already received 50 thousand stars, and 100 thousand stars on 30 March 2019, which made it the top trending repository on GitHub.[52] The repository reached 120 thousand stars on 31 March 2019, and 200 thousand stars on 9 April 2019, making it the second most starred repository on GitHub. The flurry of activity led to the "issue" page of the repository to be flooded with spam and shut down, which was hotly discussed on Zhihu, Sina Weibo, and WeChat.[1][53]
The original aim of the repository was to list the companies that use the 996 working hour system, but it soon developed into a movement; the Anti 996 Licence was created to explicitly prohibit companies using the 996 system from using open source[a] code licensed under it.[54][55]
Browser blacklist
On 2 April 2019, it was widely reported that Tencent's QQ browser and WeChat, Alibaba's UC Browser, Qihoo 360's 360 Browser, and many other Chromium-based Mainland Chinese browsers blocked the 996.icu repository on GitHub, describing it as "an illegal and fraudulent site".[56][26]
Support by Microsoft employees
On 18 April 2019, employees at Microsoft and GitHub created a GitHub repository named "support.996.ICU" in support of the 996.ICU campaign, which they believe could be under threat of Chinese government censorship.[57][58][59][60][61][62]
Reactions
Support
Jack Ma stated that workers should consider 996 "a huge blessing" as there is no way to "achieve the success [one] want[s] without paying extra effort and time".[63][64][65][66][67][26][68], while Richard Liu, founder of JD.com, said that "Slackers are not my brothers!"[26][32] Jason Calacanis, an entrepreneur and angel investor, describes 996 as "the same exact work ethic that built America".[69]
Criticism
Several Chinese media outlets criticized the 996 working system. Xin Shi Ping[b] of the Xinhua News Agency said that the system "violates labor law and overtakes health and the future. It does harm to hard-working workers and it is a misunderstanding of the hard-working spirit".[70] People's Daily says that "advocating 'hard work' does not mean resorting to and enforcing the 996 system",[71][72][73] while the China News Service says that "It is unnecessary to exchange life for money".[74]
Beijing Daily criticized Jack Ma and Richard Liu for "boasting" the 996 work schedule, claiming that "It's aimed at disguising reduction of salary of lay-off",[75] while Wang Xinya, a writer for Banyuetan, stated that some entrepreneurs disregarded the law and associate 996 with hard work, calling it "poisonous" chicken soup. Wang also stated that the system has nothing to do with employee diligence, but has everything to do with company interests.[76]
Dutch programmer Guido van Rossum remarked that the 996 work schedule is "inhumane".[77][54][78][79] In 2021, Chinese scholars stressed on policy-makers that "there is a need to reform work policies to realize the lowering of working time per worker in China (and also to curb excessive-work cultures like 996)".[12] They argued, without such initiatives the dual circulation policy is doomed to fail.
Legal issues
The 996 working hour system was deemed illegal by the Supreme People's Court on 27 August 2021.[80] However, it has been doubted whether it will be fully enforced.[81][82]
See also
- Buddha-like mindset
- Eight-hour day
- Forty-Hour Week Convention, 1935
- Karōshi
- Lochner v. New York, Lochner era
- Simple living
- Tang ping
- Wage theft
- Working time
Notes
- ^ Such a license would not meet most definitions of open source software, such as The Open Source Definition, as the 996 exclusion counts as a limitation on purpose of use.
- ^ Not to be confused with Xi Jinping.
References
- ^ a b Xue Yujie (2019-03-28). David Paulk (ed.). "Chinese Developers Protest Overwork on GitHub". Sixth Tone. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Denise Hruby (2018-05-08). "Young Chinese are sick of working long hours". BBC. Archived from the original on 2019-04-02. Retrieved 2019-04-02.
- ^ Zhao, Ang (2018-06-03). "不接受"996"是不能吃苦?媒体:合法权益应获保障" [Do not accept "996" is not able to work hard? Media: Legal rights should be protected]. Xinhuanet (in Simplified Chinese). Workers' Daily. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-30.
- ^ Sarah Dai; Li Tao (2019-01-29). "China's work ethic stretches beyond '996' as tech companies feel the impact of slowdown". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Li Yuan (2017-02-22). "China's Grueling Formula for Success: 9-9-6". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Zheping Huang (2019-03-20). "No sleep, no sex, no life: tech workers in China's Silicon Valley face burnout before they reach 30". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 2019-04-05. Retrieved 2019-04-05.
- ^ a b Wang, Jenny Jing (2020). "How managers use culture and controls to impose a '996' work regime in China that constitutes modern slavery". Accounting & Finance. 60 (4): 4331–4359. doi:10.1111/acfi.12682. ISSN 1467-629X. S2CID 225463581.
- ^ Lu, Ying-Ying (2019-04-13). "Ep. 42: To 996, or Not to 996, That Is the Question". Pandaily. Archived from the original on 2019-04-29. Retrieved 2019-04-29.
- ^ Yuan Yang (2019-04-03). "China tech worker protest against long working hours goes viral". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2019-04-03. Retrieved 2019-04-05.
- ^ Bill Ide (2019-04-04). "China Tech Workers Protest Long Work Hours in Online Campaign". VOA News. Archived from the original on 2019-04-05. Retrieved 2019-04-05.
- ^ Lin Qiqing; Raymond Zhong (2019-04-29). "'996' Is China's Version of Hustle Culture. Tech Workers Are Sick of It". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2019-05-03. Retrieved 2019-05-03.
- ^ a b c Javed, Saad Ahmed; Bo, Yu; Tao, Liangyan; Dong, Wenjie (2021-06-07). "The 'Dual Circulation' development model of China: Background and insights". Rajagiri Management Journal. ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). doi:10.1108/RAMJ-03-2021-0016. ISSN 0972-9968.
- ^ Wang, Pinzhi (2018-03-30). "50.7%受访者称所在企业有"加班文化"" [50.7% of respondents said their companies have an "overtime culture"]. Xinhuanet (in Simplified Chinese). China Youth Daily. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Justin Bergman (2016-08-26). "Inside the high-pressure world of China's start-up workers". BBC. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ a b Liu, Jia, ed. (2019-01-31). "默认996工作制背后:被撕掉的焦虑遮羞布" [Behind the default 996 work system: the shame of being torn off anxiety]. 第一财经 [Yicai] (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Liang, Lu-Hai (21 January 2021). "The psychology behind 'revenge bedtime procrastination'". BBC. Retrieved 19 May 2022.
- ^ Tsui, Audrey H.H. (27 June 2008). "Asian wellness in decline: a cost of rising prosperity". International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 1 (2): 123–135. doi:10.1108/17538350810893919. ISSN 1753-8351. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
- ^ Monet, Charmika (26 March 2014). "Working to Death in China". The Diplomat. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
- ^ "英报:过劳死提醒中国人"懒散些"" [British newspaper: overwork death reminds Chinese people to "be lazy"]. People's Daily. Xinhua News Agency. 6 April 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
信息技术(IT)从业人员似乎尤其脆弱:近日一项覆盖35万IT从业者的调查显示,98.8%的受访者表示自己有健康问题。
[Information technology (IT) workers appear to be particularly vulnerable: a recent survey covering 350,000 IT workers showed that 98.8% of respondents said they had health problems.] - ^ "Death from Overwork in China". China Labour Bulletin. 11 August 2006. Retrieved 19 May 2022.
- ^ Tan, JS (2022). "Tech Workers Lie Flat". Dissent. Retrieved 19 May 2022.
- ^ Zhang, Jiayun; Chen, Yang; Gong, Qingyuan; Wang, Xin; Ding, Aaron Yi; Xiao, Yu; Hui, Pan (March 2021). "Understanding the Working Time of Developers in IT Companies in China and the United States". IEEE Software. 38 (2): 96–106. doi:10.1109/MS.2020.2988022. ISSN 0740-7459. S2CID 218777201.
- ^ "China steps in to regulate brutal '996' work culture". BBC News. 2021-09-01. Retrieved 2022-03-20.
- ^ "Leak from 58.com: Chinese tech companies' overtime culture". e27. 2016-09-05. Archived from the original on 2019-04-28. Retrieved 2019-04-28.
- ^ Zhao, Lei; Wang, Yu (2016-09-03). "58同城员工吐槽"996工作制"" [58 Tongcheng employees spit out "996 work system"]. Phoenix New Media (in Simplified Chinese). The Beijing News. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-30.
- ^ a b c d "Office workers in China organise a rare online labour movement". The Economist. 2019-04-17. Archived from the original on 2019-04-29. Retrieved 2019-04-29.
- ^ Shead, Sam (2021-05-06). "Why some tech workers are turning down jobs at TikTok". Retrieved 2022-04-23.
- ^ Huang, Zheping (2021-10-31). "TikTok Owner ByteDance Mandates Shorter Working Hours". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2022-04-23.
- ^ "Death of 28-year-old ByteDance employee fuels ongoing controversy on overwork in Chinese tech companies". KrASIA. 2022-02-23. Retrieved 2022-02-24.
- ^ Song, Tao (2016-09-02). "不学好!曝京东云高管"以身作则"实行996工作制" [To be no good! JD's executives were exposed to "lead as example" to implement the 996 work system]. qudong.com (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-30.
- ^ Xu, Qian'ang (2019-03-12). "京东回应"955工作制":不强制,但要全情投入" [JD's responses to "955 working hour system": not mandatory, but emplorees need to be fully engaged at work]. Guancha.cn (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-30.
- ^ a b Josh Horwitz; Brenda Goh (2019-04-13). "China's JD.com boss criticizes 'slackers' as company makes cuts". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2019-04-29. Retrieved 2019-04-29.
- ^ Yujie Xue (2021-01-04). "Death of 22-year-old Pinduoduo employee renews controversy over China's 996 overwork culture, sparking an investigation". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 2021-01-05. Retrieved 2021-01-05.
- ^ "Death of Chinese tech worker fuels anger over brutal hours". The Washington Post. 2021-01-05. Archived from the original on 2021-01-05. Retrieved 2021-01-11.
- ^ "知乎回应拼多多账号截图:身份真实无误相关回答实为自行删" [Zhihu's responses to Pinduoduo screenshots: No doubts of authenticity, answer was actually self-deleted]. Sina News. 4 January 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-01-04.
- ^ "2 employee deaths and a viral video renew debate of China's '996' overwork culture". Fortune. 2021-01-11. Archived from the original on 2021-01-11. Retrieved 2021-01-11.
- ^ "New employee death at Chinese tech giant Pinduoduo prompts calls for boycott". The Washington Post. 2021-01-11. Archived from the original on 2021-01-11. Retrieved 2021-01-11.
- ^ "网传拼多多员工因在网上发布同事被抬上救护车的照片,被管理层逼迫主动辞职、赶出公司?事件真实性如何?" [It was reported that a Pinduoduo employee was forced to resign and kicked out of the company by the management for posting photos of a colleague being carried in an ambulance online? What is the authenticity of the incident?]. Zhihu. Archived from the original on 2021-06-25.
- ^ "拼多多员工因发帖被逼主动辞职". Sina News. Archived from the original on 2021-01-11.
- ^ 三言财经 (2019-01-28). "有赞年会宣布996制度、鼓励员工离婚,为什么越来越多企业炫耀"扭曲"价值观?". 36氪 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-30.
- ^ 张瑜 (2019-01-29). 尹淑琼 (ed.). "强推"996"工作制 有赞做错了什么?". 南报网 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-30.
- ^ 尹莉娜 (2019-01-31). "杭州劳动监察部门回应有赞"996"工作制:已介入调查". 搜狐 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Wen, Jing (2019-04-05). "互联网公司加班问题加剧 40家陷"996"工作制风波" [The problem of overtime work in Internet companies has intensified, and 40 companies are caught in the "996" work system troubles]. China Central Television (in Simplified Chinese). Beijing Youth Daily. Archived from the original on 2019-04-09. Retrieved 2019-04-09.
- ^ Qiqing, Lin; Zhong, Raymond (2019-04-29). "'996' Is China's Version of Hustle Culture. Tech Workers Are Sick of It". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-06-08.
- ^ "996.ICU/README.md". GitHub. 2019-03-30. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Yingzhi Yang (2019-03-29). "'Developers' lives matter' – Chinese software engineers use Github to protest against the country's 996 work schedule". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ "China's tech workers protest brutal work culture with communist jingles". Inkstone. 2019-03-29. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ 局长 (2019-03-29). "No sleep, no sex, no life,程序员这次忍不了了". 开源中国 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Xinmei Shen (2019-03-28). "Follow China's "996" work hours and you'll end up in an ICU, says Chinese developer". Abacus. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ RADII China (2019-03-28). "GitHub Protest Over Chinese Tech Companies' "996" Culture Goes Viral". RADII. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Liao, Shannon (2019-04-02). "Chinese developers use GitHub to protest long work hours". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2019-04-09. Retrieved 2019-04-09.
- ^ 橙皮书 (2019-03-28). "用代码抗议996加班:集结在github上的程序员,正在进行一场社会实验". 36氪 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-30.
- ^ Alfred数据室 (2019-03-29). "数据解读|都是哪些程序员在GitHub上反对996?". 澎湃新闻 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ a b 唐云路; 罗骢 (2019-04-04). "996 惹怒程序员之后,他们的抗议引发了全球关注". Qdaily (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-04-05. Retrieved 2019-04-05.
- ^ "火爆的996.ICU项目正在酝酿开源许可证 禁止996公司使用". cnBeta.COM (in Simplified Chinese). 蓝点网. 2019-03-29. Archived from the original on 2019-03-31. Retrieved 2019-03-31.
- ^ Xinmei Shen (2019-04-03). "Chinese browsers block protest against China's 996 overtime work culture". Abacus. Archived from the original on 2019-04-04. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
- ^ Shannon Liao (2019-04-22). "Microsoft workers pressure company to stand by embattled Chinese GitHub repo". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2019-04-23. Retrieved 2019-04-23.
- ^ David Reid (2019-04-23). "Microsoft employees add support to Chinese tech workers protesting 'grueling' overtime culture". CNBC. Archived from the original on 2019-04-23. Retrieved 2019-04-23.
- ^ "Microsoft workers join China's debate over grueling workweek". ABC News. Associated Press. 2019-04-22. Archived from the original on 2019-04-23. Retrieved 2019-04-23.
- ^ Rosalie Chan (2019-04-23). "A group of Microsoft and GitHub employees have come out in support of Chinese tech workers protesting the infamous '996' work hours". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 2019-04-23. Retrieved 2019-04-23.
- ^ Sarah Emerson (2019-04-23). "Microsoft Employees Support Chinese Developers Fighting for Fair Labor Practices". Motherboard. Archived from the original on 2019-04-23. Retrieved 2019-04-23.
- ^ Caroline O'Donovan (2019-04-22). "A Post About China's "996" Workweek Went Viral On GitHub. Now Microsoft Employees Want To Protect It From Censorship". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on 2019-04-23. Retrieved 2019-04-23.
- ^ Serenitie Wang; Daniel Shane (2019-04-16). "Jack Ma endorses China's controversial 12 hours a day, 6 days a week work culture". CNN. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ "Jack Ma defends the 'blessing' of a 12-hour working day". BBC News. 2019-04-15. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ Lulu Yilun Chen; Bloomberg (2019-04-15). "Alibaba's Jack Ma Again Endorses China's '996' Overtime Culture as Testament to Professional Passion". Fortune. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ Nicole Lyn Pesce (2019-04-15). "Alibaba's Jack Ma calls the '996' — China's 72-hour workweek — a 'huge blessing'". MarketWatch. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ Lily Kuo (2019-04-15). "Working 9 to 9: Chinese tech workers push back against long hours". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2019-04-17. Retrieved 2019-04-17.
- ^ Bryce Covert (2019-04-21). "The Richest Man in China Is Wrong. 12-Hour Days Are No 'Blessing.'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2019-05-03. Retrieved 2019-05-03.
- ^ @Jason (15 April 2019). "#Founders: We're up against #JackMa..." (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ 辛识平 (2019-04-15). "辛识平:奋斗应提倡,996当退场". 新华网 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ "【#你好,明天#】". 人民微博--人民日报 (in Simplified Chinese). 2019-04-14. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ "人民日报微评:崇尚奋斗 绝不等于强制"996"". 新浪财经. 2019-04-14. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ "人民日报发声:崇尚奋斗,不等于强制996". 搜狐. 中国财经报. 2019-04-14. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ "逃离996:我宁可不婚不育不买房,也不要拼命". 人民网 (in Simplified Chinese). 中国新闻网. 2019-04-16. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ 董禹含 (2019-04-15). "马云强东争相鼓吹"996"背后是变相降薪或裁员". 人民网 (in Simplified Chinese). 北京日报. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ 王新亚 (2019-04-15). 孔德明 (ed.). "半月谈评论:996与奋斗无关,与利益有关". 半月谈 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2019-04-16.
- ^ Qu, Tracy (9 April 2019). "How GitHub became a bulletin board for Chinese tech worker complaints". Quartz. Retrieved 29 May 2022.
- ^ "Alibaba's Founder Jack Ma Says 996 Work Schedule Is a Blessing for Employees". PingWest. 2019-04-12. Archived from the original on 2019-04-18. Retrieved 2019-04-18.
- ^ Rita Liao (2019-04-12). "China's startup ecosystem is hitting back at demanding working hours". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2019-04-18. Retrieved 2019-04-18.
- ^ "China Spells Out How Excessive 996 Work Culture is Illegal". Bloomberg.com. 27 August 2021.
- ^ Meng, Siyuan (15 November 2021). "China's burned-out tech workers are fighting back against long hours". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 21 June 2022.
But even though authorities and state media seem to be taking a tougher stand, it is unclear when or if the rules that make 996 illegal will be fully enforced.
- ^ Liu, Hong Yu (24 January 2022). "The role of the state in influencing work conditions in China's internet industry: Policy, evidence, and implications for industrial relations". Journal of Industrial Relations: 12. doi:10.1177/00221856211068488. ISSN 0022-1856.
The contradictory rulings by the district courts in these cases, one for the employee and two against, suggest that the legislative framework in China is not in a position that can stand firmly to defend workers against the inhumane and unlawful working hours. Wang and Cooke (2021) found a similar level of arbitrariness in court rulings in labour disputes between Chinese platforms and their workers.