User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 42

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).


Sleep to Live

Hey,

Sorry about that Sleep to Live page. I will revise and resubmit.

Thanks, Jake —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob.rosen3 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Count (Mikael Eldridge) DJ Shadow & No Doubt Producer Deletion

Hello NawlinWiki,

I am still waiting for a response regarding the deletion of music producer Count (Mikael Eldridge). As mentioned, all of the musical projects he produces are wikipedia friendly projects including official radiohead and frank sinatra releases. you can confirm at vertebraeproductions.com. You deleted the page for Count before i entered any information with sources. We are on this end wondering why talented producers for huge hit major major bands are not permitted to have wikipedia pages. That seems really wrong, considering that the Producer, in the music industry, is one of the most important parts of an album. without the producer, there wouldn't be an album. without an album there wouldn't be hit bands (most of the time). If you will not permit important major music producers a factual wiki page, what kind of encyclopedia does mr. Wales hope to build for the wikipedia music project? crazywanda


The Twenty Minute Drive page was marked HOLD ON for a reason. I am working on it. Thanks for deleting it, jackass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elsa27 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Easynews deletion

Hello NawlinWiki,

I would like to hear from you some more explanation about the deletion of the article Easynews I have started few minutes ago. I have follwed the guidline to start a new article and as expample a very related article Giganews. Thank you for your help and explanations.--Bosonz0 (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MyWorld Deletion

Y'know, I did check out the wizard, and it doesn't cover much about what passes as a viable Video Game. Every time it was deleted, I went on a whim and improved the page according to the rules. When one rule was filled and the article still deleted, I tried another rule, finally coming to the conclusion that the issue was citation... What passes as "Notable" is a relative term and should be far more expanded upon. If you had said at first MyWorld didn't pass, for the reason you gave, then that would of saved us both an hour or so. Nethertheless, point taken.

Azkanan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azkanan (talk • contribs) 19:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ToughMudder Deletion

I am writing to ascertain on what grounds the ToughMudder page was temporarily deleted. What issues, pertaining to the pages content, are in contention with Wikipedia's policies? Please respond specifically and comprehensively. Thank you. user:fratguy 1, email lerman.jonah@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fratguy1 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Are there a Recycle Bin on Wikipedia?

I would like to use the article Easynews that you have deleted yesterday. Are there a way to recover it for making it compliant with Wikipedia guidlines. It would allow me to buy sometime using the deleted version. Many thanks for your help. --Bosonz0 (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maryam Noroozian

I agree that the article on Maryam noroozian was a bit brief, but it did make a "plausible assertion" of notability in claiming that she was a prominent neurologist in Iran. I don't know if this faculty bio bears up to WP:ACADEMIC, but she does appear to be a fairly prominent player in the Iranian neurological community. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

administrative evil

Have you read my response on my talk page yet? Greetings. --JorisvS (talk) 14:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

iGo Page Deletion

NawlinWiki,

Please reinstate the iGo page. It is unclear how a publicly traded company, such as iGo (IGOI) can be deleted due to not being a "non-notable company."

Acopeland (talk) 17:20, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


NawlinWiki, 

Thank you I worked hard on it and I don't usually use wikipedia so I don't really know how things work ex: I don't even know how to put a picture up.


Hello NawlinWiki, Could you please help me with my page instead of deleting it?--Disgracious23 (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Town Gospel Choir deletion

Hello NawlinWiki. Not sure why you have deleted the page for the Cape Town Gospel Choir, a new choir founded by a large existing events promotor (separately listed on Wikipedia), with a history of hundreds of public events involving hundreds of thousands of people over the last 13 years in both the UK and South Africa. Please could you reactivate the page?

Colinpeckham (talk) 07:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying to my question. I'll look at the article and make proposed changes in due course.

Colinpeckham (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tubz

Hello NawlinWiki,

Why have you remove my article Tubz. It is not advertising. It is a history of Tubz. Most people included Nestle have similiar pages. I have had other Administrators look at the page and they have help me with the layout and wording of the page (as I new to Wikipedia). So I can not understand how you can just go to a page and delete it with out looking into this matter further.

I am waiting for an expanation and any help you can offer as it has taken a long time to write this article. You quick respone would be nice as it was deleted very quickly.

SimonTubz (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Could you Userfy the page I created and was recently deleted (A7) on Shawn Christopher Joyce. I would like to make additions and have it reconsidered. Thanks! AlumniUpdate —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlumniUpdate (talk • contribs) 16:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

National Happyism

Hello NawlinWiki,

I hope you will reinstate the National Happyism page. Besides the Diener reference cited, I will also present research on this with the Chair of the UCLA Economics Department, Roger Farmer, on my television program, Economic Solutions, on KGEM in Monrovia, CA. This program will be taped on 6 April 2010, and you may view four earlier telecasts via this link on the KGEM Website: http://kgem.tv/category/economic-solutions/. Upon telecasting the program (called "How the Economy Works," previewing elements of Prof. Farmer's forthcoming book of the same name), KGEM will also post the link for live streaming, which we would be happy to cite on Wikipedia as an additional reference.

Thanks for reconsidering.

Zane —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonard Zane (talk • contribs) 22:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For tirelessly patrolling newpages, and deleting articles so quickly, that half the time they're gone before I'm done tagging them... The Thing // Talk // Contribs 17:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Wikipedia - A New Community of Practice?' Deletion

Not sure if this is the right place to put this, but you marked Wikipedia_-_A_New_Community_of_Practice? for deletion as 'not notable' so here goes...

There are currently no external sources to indicate notability due to the fact that the book was published in September 2009. I have a copy in front of me, and it is an academic treatment of the Wikipedia community, particularly as a Community of Practice, and as such I thought it would be relevant to include in the category of 'books about wikipedia'. I was in the process of writing a bit more as a description of the book and have now filled out the article slightly, including a few references. Since it's an academic book, the Wikipedia:Notability_(books)#Academic_books guidelines suggest that it need only be based on 'how influential the book is considered to be in its specialty area, or adjunct disciplines' and this appears to be the only serious book on Wikipedia from a historical sociological perspective (rather than, for example, a computer science perspective). I would also point out that the author is speaking at an academic conference on wikipedia in March this year.

As an administrator, then, do you recommend writing a better description of the book for the article, based on sources from around the web, or perhaps deleting the article and waiting until the book is cited by enough other publications and papers? — M3TAinfo @ 17:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What constitutes 'sufficient' reviews, then? Would the author speaking at a relevant conference on the books subject not be relevant for notability? I'm not sure what harm it does to keep it there, now, since the article does now have references and link to reviews added, particularly given the caveat about academic book notability in the guidelines. — M3TAinfo @ 18:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened an AfD since deletion is not uncontroversial; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia - A New Community of Practice?. —KuyaBriBriTalk 23:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion criteria G5 - A discussion

Hi there. I've started a discussion at WT:CSD - G5 that I'd value your input on. Thanks. GedUK  10:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of UYDO page...?

Hi, I created a page yesterday about the charity UYDO (United Youth Development Organization) but it was deleted within a matter of minutes! I see it was because of A7, but I don't understand it?! How can a charity that aims to contribute towards the elimination of poverty be insignificant!?!? Would appreciate some insight!! Thanks:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristofferhy (talk • contribs) 13:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion due to Copyright Infringement

Hi there, thank you for the message regarding the deletion of 'Katharine DeShaw' page. I have reviewed the terms of contribution and now understand the rule completely. I am requesting permission to attempt again. Thanks for your assistance Nawlin Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zackaa05 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Automatonon's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LOTROCast

Dear Nawlinwiki,

I understand that you must be busy as an admin for Wikipedia, but I filed an inquisition into the deletion of the LOTROCast page and heard no response for over two months. It has been deleted from your page in a one of your recent purges of outdated posts. Could you please review what I had written and let me know your thoughts.

Thanks!

Sevey13 (talk) 03:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keno Auctions

You just speedy-deleted Keno Auctions. The New York Times article at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/arts/design/22antiques.html suggests that Keno Auctions might be notable. I didn't create the article, and I hadn't heard of the company before I noticed the article in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recently deleted "Hopism"

Hi! Would it be possible for me to see recently deleted "Hopism" article? I'm just curious as to what it was about. Thank you. Bus stop (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This part of it was great. Thank you again! Bus stop (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rustaveli cinema

Could you please restore the article Rustaveli cinema? I was still working on it. Thanks. Демоны Врубеля/Vrubel's Demons (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but again nominated for speedy deletion despite me having added two sources and some information about the history and the architectural design that should be enough to establish notability. Демоны Врубеля/Vrubel's Demons (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fugative

I was about to create an article for the British rapper Fugative but saw that one had previously existed and was deleted by yourself. Please could you let me know the reasons why and whether it would be worth my time creating a new one.

He's an up-an-coming artist who has been signed by Kirk Burrowes, a business parter of P Diddy (see'Fugative Wanted'). His debut single 'Supafly' reached Number 48 in the UK chart (see Fugative - The Official Website).

Is this a notability issue? If so, will the information I've provided be suffient to warrant a Wikipedia page? Nottmlad (talk) 00:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Links

NawlinWiki, you have deleted links I added, with the following explanation (excerpt):

"Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia..., advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. ...See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)"

I added a link to our advocacy group which focuses on the issue of beach access in Fairfield, CT (page: "Fairfield Beach") We are not a "for-profit" site in any way, nor, did I post for "advertising or promotion." We do not collect fees, sell merchandise, or request dues in any sense. Our site is informational. We are an important local group with over 1,100 members, and important in as much a way as the Residents Association, which you have left intact. I would also point out that links in the "dog behavior" page which you mentioned do indeed have much advertising within. Wiki is littered with countless thousands of external commercial links... many of which I have used... (starting point: what do you think IMDB is, which is connected with virtually any Wiki page concerning a movie?), I have no clue how you make the claim otherwise. Vladimirwiki (talk) 06:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CSD of Border Jumpers

It appears that the Border Jumpers article you deleted on 27 January (presumably CSD-A7) was recreated by User:Borderjumpers on 2 February with a slightly changed name Border jumpers. If the article is substantially the same--I believe it has serious notability issues among other, I will gladly tag for CSD-A7 again. Thanks--Mike Cline (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please remove the protection of Anglophilia?

Hi!

I tried to move the aforementioned article to Anglophile, as per Talk:Anglophilia#Why Anglophilia?. It turned out to be impossible. As far as I understand the log, some vandal moved the page to Insanity in 2008, giving you some trouble with restoration, after which you semi-protected the page; this was later changed to an immobility protection (by a user who isn't very active nowadays).

Could you please remove this restriction, or move the article yourself? (Provided, of course, you don't disagree with the proposed move; in which case I'd be interested of learning why!) JoergenB (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! JoergenB (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting that weird edit of my user page. I wonder what the story was there. -- Walt Pohl (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nantahala Brewing Deletion

Tried to add the Nantahala Brewing Company that is new to Bryson City, NC. You deleted it based on "No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion". I've read the rules and simply clicked on another article about North Carolina breweries where the company is mentioned. No one had completed an entry for them, so, I did. What's the deal? Ncexplorer (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Four Green Steps Re-Try

Re-trying to add Four Green Steps. Should work now from your feedback as to why it was previously taken down.

(talk) 13:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets creating BestOnlineGamesEver

Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dragonox488

You blocked one sock, not sure how many there might be (since I can't see deleted edits). —ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 20:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twitch Film

When you deleted this, I was in the course of an edit that added sources and clearer claims of notability. When i saved that edit i recreated it. I am going to undelete the history so the text's authors can be attributed properly. I don't think this is an A7 speedy any longer, please review it for your self. If you want to delete again i won't wheel-war. Whether this would survive an AfD I'm not sure, but I think it might. DES (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that was quick. DES (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Native American Journalists Association

You deleted the entry for the Native American Journalists Association, but have left smaller minority journalism organizations intact. I'm a newer wikipedia user, and uncertain how to challenge this. NAJA is a viable long-time journalism organization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hochungra (talk • contribs) 18:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joy to the World, Our Teacher's Dead

Hi. Why did you delete this? It doesn't seem to meet G5. Also, it's at DRV. ÷seresin 04:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • My mistake, restored minus the sockpuppet edits. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 04:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cfcuk

Hi

Please can you explain why you are considering deleting the cfcuk page about the Chelsea football fanzine cfcuk.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueblagger (talk • contribs) 14:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • As stated in the AFD discussion, because the article cites no sources (see WP:V) to indicate that this fanzine is notable (see WP:N). NawlinWiki (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hi

The fanzine is 'notable' in as much as it is the only Chelsea supporters' printed organ to criticise the club's policy, especially highlighting mal-treatment of supporters. As well as that, while other fanzines connected with other football teams now cost £1.50 or even £2, the price of cfcuk has always been and always will be £1.

I hope that is a satisfactory explanation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueblagger (talk • contribs) 21:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will change the way that I have phrased what I wrote - I hope that that will suffice - thank you for the information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueblagger (talk • contribs) 22:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mecanismo

NW, would you kindly explain to this guy why he has to provide references to prove what he says about The Sugarman 3? He's lowering this to the personal-attack level, and I've pretty much exhausted my patience with him. Thanks. (Gotta go to work.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, take a look at Talk:The Sugarman 3 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Scone and tell me honestly if I'm wrong, or this guy's just being a total jerk. Thanks. He's driving me nuts. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Update: User:Mecanismo is at it again, even after I requested the AfD be closed as keep after another editor found enough refs to establish notability. see my talk page (at the bottom). I slapped him with an immediate level-4 warning for personal attacks - immediate since he's been around WP long enough to know know better. I've done as much as I can (without violating policy myself by calling him an a-hole or something similar), so it's up to admins now. Thanks. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Filter 292

Hi NW, I disabled your newly created filter 292 and merged it into 135 in order to save some conditions because we were hitting the condition limit very frequently since this creation. I also left some commentary on WT:EF if you wouldn't mind responding when you find some time. Let me know if you have any questions regarding this. Thanks, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left a note at WT:EF after User:Gurch's response, but I just wanted to poke you directly and say that I was probably a little direct when I came here, but I truly appreciate what you're doing with the filters and my statement to you wasn't meant to be a "please don't touch things you don't understand" but rather a "that's good, let's just tidy up a bit". Thanks again! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SCARAB

I was attempting to add information on SCARAB after finding it in the list of gaming conventions article, as nothing had been written about it yet. I am attempting to rewrite the page with more substantial information and resubmit it. After reviewing the guidelines A7, I'm unsure what information qualifies as important or significant. Any clarification you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Part of the confusion may lie in the fact that the convention & the organizing group share the same name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FeleciaH (talk • contribs) 03:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BlackBook2

This page was not a promotion, it was a page describing exactly what the company does. Did I have to many links in the page? If so, I will get rid of them. Our company has over 20 million members, it has the right to be in Wikipedia! Please give me more details on how I can adjust my page to meet the criteria. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbtwo (talk • contribs) 07:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I was refered to you on User_talk:Cirt#Question where I inquired about the move protection of Slipknot (band). Debresser (talk) 07:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

"(Protection log); 12:10 . . NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) protected User:Kintetsubuffalo [move=sysop] (indefinite) (Page-move vandalism: target per edit filter)" Don't really understand, but thank you! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 08:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet alarm !?

In this Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 February 11, how come you identified User:Devildevil1 as a sockpuppet of blocked User:Bgds, and are you sure about it? If yes, note that there is a new sockpuppet: Special:Contributions/Devildevil2.
Regards, PanchoS (talk) 10:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki

The page WorkingWithMen was deleted but I've reworked the information citing sources such as Fatherhood Institute (listed in Wiki, they're a similar organisation), Guidestar, references on the BBC and so forth. Is this the sort of information required for inclusion? What's the best way to proceed on this?

Many thanks Webnaut (talk) 15:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing an editors talk page

RE: [1]

Hey, just wondering, like all rules here, there seems to be inconsistent enforcement. You are not the first editor I have seen who has deleted a users talk page, in fact many administrators have deleted their own talk pages. What is the chances of me getting my talk page deleted? :) Okip BLP Contest 01:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. I appreciate your prompt response. I am sure you restore it if they return. No need to respond :) happy editing. Okip BLP Contest 02:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a Log Reference

Hey. I am a novice and had my page deleted. Can the log be deleted too, because now google searches lead directly to a page that says my page has been deleted. It's bad for business. I apologize for the inconvenience of creating a page contrary to the guidelines. Again, I am a novice. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.maynard (talk • contribs) 02:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael.maynard (talk • contribs) 03:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

psychic jessica ann

hey there if you can just unprotect it and delete it i dont understand completely what i did was wrong considering your site has alot of flaws in it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torontoinfo2010 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Filter

Hi NW, I saw your addition to filter 54 58. Just wanted to drop a line letting you know it looks very similar to what I've been doing at 294 (I'm intentionally being ambiguous, but you should understand -- if you don't, feel free to ask). Feel free to add anything there if it shouldn't be permanent. Thanks! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 04:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Shuster

This page needs protection for a while. It's being vandalized after Shuster blew his third straight match for the U at the Olympics. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you! Tired of seeing all the Tweets and actual news stories about his article being vandalized. We've saved Wikipedia again. :-) - Realkyhick

(Talk to me) 20:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

**Make Help Not Deletion**

Hi NawlinWiki, I'm --Memorialhighschool (talk) 22:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Memorialhighschool. I'd just like to say that there is this really cool illusionist that goes to our school and he wants to be an illusionist and give all the money that people buy for his tickets to charities for Haiti and other charities. How great of a person is that? Too great that I feel like we all should learn from this. So I decided to write an article about him and the reason why I put Idk was so that I can interview him someday and replace the Idk with information. Doesn't that just all make sense? Now if you are a nice person like I hear you are *cough* you might as well think about how those poor Haiti people are suffering. Oh and his name is Carter Blackburn if you don't know him. Please Alison and NawlinWiki. If you really would like to do something good for Haiti please help expand my articles instead of deleting them and ignoring my pleas. Yes and I believe Wikipedia administrators should actually think twice before they mindlessly click delete on our articles that we worked hard on. If I were an administrator I would do something different than what NawlinWiki did. And Alison, I understand why you blocked me last night. But it's okay because I really shouldn't have spammed random talk articles. I apologize for being so "spammy" (if that's a word) but NawlinWiki really needs to think of what others have been telling her. Please stop deleting our articles and at least think what you're doing! It's not so hard.[reply]

"You're right that he's a responsible type. Whenever they're looking for a scapegoat he's the one who always gets the blame." ---Anonymous

File:Kapilavatsyayan.jpg

Hi, I moved the image to Commons under the same name and wanted to tag the image as redundant to a Commons image, but you protected the description page. You can delete the image. Regards Hekerui (talk) 12:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've gone ahead and deleted the local revision, and also have fully protected the commons copy. You know why, NW - Alison ❤ 12:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing some dusty old blocks

Could you take a look at the below list and advise if they can/should be unblocked per WP:IPBLENGTH? Thanks, –xenotalk 15:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked IPs blocked 2006/7
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. 
contributions  20061023172607 spammer
contributions  20061028123655 link spammer
contributions  20061102174157 link spammer
contributions  20061120144526 spambot
contributions  20061120144608 spambot
contributions  20061204154602 spambot
contributions  20061222151958 spambot
contributions  20070103150142 spambot
contributions  20070103150241 spambot
contributions  20070111150732 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070113031018 spambot
contributions  20070115144916 spambot
contributions  20070115202715 spambot
contributions  20070115202757 spambot
contributions  20070115202819 spambot
contributions  20070115202919 spambot
contributions  20070116044622 spambot
contributions  20070116044848 spambot
contributions  20070116181348 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070116191210 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070117024330 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070117024621 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070117144523 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070117144614 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070117144714 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070117160058 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070118005038 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070120133519 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070120133552 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070120175440sapmbot, anon only block
contributions  20070120180504 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070120180533 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070120180555 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070121132819 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122160657 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122160844 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122160859 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122160914 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122160930 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122160944 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122160959 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122161425 spambot, anon only
contributions  20070122161440 spambot, anon only
contributions  20070122181628 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070122181658 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070123131251 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070123131333 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070123155501 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070123155551 spambot, anon only indef block
contributions  20070124031556 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070124031645 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070124031712 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070124031755 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070124133827 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070124162926 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070125011333 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070125011350 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070125132508 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070126205614 spambot
contributions  20070129032625 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070129032641 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070129040718 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070129041026 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070129170514 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070130151028 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070130151814 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070130171706 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070130171731 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070130171755 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070130174441returning  spambot, anon only
contributions  20070130174646 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070130174703 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070130174718 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070131041735 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070131151236 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070131164640 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070131164737 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070131164919 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070131164949 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070131190759 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070201130453 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070201130558 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070201161959 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070201162019 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070201162036 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070202020624returning  spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070202051447 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070202051550 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070202052024 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070205172743 spambot, anon only account
contributions  20070207040500 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070207041744 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070207132856 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070207132955 spambot, anon only block
contributions  20070207133133 spambot, anon only block
  • Going down the list and unblocking any that aren't open proxies. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Much obliged. Cheers, –xenotalk 16:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page

I am currently working on a backlog of requested medical article. I started Red ear syndrome which appears to have been deleted in the past. Wondering about the arguements for this is how one would view the discussion. Thanks.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it was a malplaced article/cut and paste of an abstract - see [2], I've restored the edits. –xenotalk 21:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism @ Indonesia...

Looks like it's not stopping. I see you're an admin. :-) cheers --Merbabu (talk) 04:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not an english speaker - so threw in a short few words in Indonesian just in case - thanks for the block SatuSuro 04:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agoura Cycles

mentions a person by name as "self-proclaimed holocaust survivor" -- hence my tagging. might simply have been awkwardly worded. please check. Meets A7 anyways. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian language

Hi, I wonder you protected this article from moving? Not that there is any need to move it but no one has tried to do that, either. Kostja (talk) 10:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Curiosity

What was the purpose of deleting and then undeleting Talk:Coulomb's law? -RadicalOne•Contact Me•Chase My Tail 23:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing vandal edit summaries by serial pagemove vandal. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Yes, that makes sense. -RadicalOne•Contact Me•Chase My Tail 23:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

British People's Party (2005)

I can't see any record of page moves in the log. What prompted the protection? Fences&Windows 23:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The attempted move was blocked by the edit filter, but this vandal typically goes back to targets repeatedly. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prot

Hey! Your protection on Brodeur's page overwrote mine, so I figured I'd let you know that I'm fine with protecting 'til the 25th. Cheers, m.o.p 03:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikia talk page

Please check [3]. --Xeeron (talk) 15:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protection breeds curiosity

Was the protection of the Everglades brought on by a Grawp / 4chan filter or some such? --Moni3 (talk) 15:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yep, attempted pagemove blocked by a filter. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. And thanks for protecting it. --Moni3 (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar (Swedish band) deletion

The band has seen their last two albums reaching spots 27 and 36 on the national album chart in Sweden. They are distributed by Sony Music Entertainment, a very major distributor.

Points two and five of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MUSIC#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles

Further they have been interviewed by and had their albums reviewed in several newspapers and music magazines in Sweden.

Sajjen (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • They are released by Gain, but distributed by Sony. I don't have a written source for this as of now. Will search. As for the chart positions

http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=54&dfom=20091111&newi=0&mode=list&navi=no Avatar - Avatar on spot 36 http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=54&dfom=20071024&newi=0&mode=list&navi=no Avatar - Schlacht on spot 27 http://www.gp.se/kulturnoje/musik/1.246872-avatar-avatar A review of the latest album by the second most read morning paper in Sweden Sajjen (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK, if you will put those citations in the article and recreate it (without the speedy delete tag), that should work. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cam Parker

Cam Parker should not have been deleted. It had sources to prove he is an actor and that he is a real person. The sources even said what roles he has been in. You didn't even give any warning to this being deleted. You should have spoke to me first. This is extremely unfair. Just because you say it isn't true doesn't give you the right to just delete it so i suggest you put it back up now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camcarson (talk • contribs) 18:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is it made up. Check Sees Me Through on tv.com http://www.tv.com/sees-me-through/show/78744/summary.html?tag=page_nav;main http://www.tv.com/sees-me-through/show/78744/cast.html?tag=page_nav;subtabs;cast

So what do you call that. how is it fake. it's just you being a twat —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camcarson (talk • contribs) 18:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's all entries you posted yourself on TV.com. Goodbye. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UAA Backlog

Hey NawlinWiki, there's a considerable backlog over at WP:UAA. Could you take a look at it if you have a couple minutes? Cheers, XXX antiuser eh? 19:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Copyright Related

Hello NawlinWiki,

If I may I would like to ask you advice about the way to follow to upload an image of famous person that have an article on Wikipedia. In fact I am going to ask him to allow me to use one of his photgrapies on Wikipedia. I know that when he will OK my request I will have to submit a ticket but I do not know the process to follow. Thank you for any explanation you can give me.

Have a nice time --Bosonz0 (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Runescape_Lords_Conquest

I hope now that i have reviewed the following guidelines about notability that you would now freely consider my origional request and tell me if it would be good enough to be put up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BertramIT/Runescape_lords_conquest BertramIT (talk) 22:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Runescape_Lords_Conquest

How about now:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BertramIT/Runescape_lords_conquest —Preceding unsigned comment added by BertramIT (talk • contribs) 22:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BertramIT (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Screenwriting Pro Page Question

Hi, I added a page for Screenwriting Pro, which was removed. The text used states a description of the site / service in a way that does not promote it above any other site or service. The page links to the list of similar software on Wikipedia. Please tell me how the page did not follow the guidelines so I may correct this mistake and post. JesseDouma (talk) 23:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request for your review

An autoblock request - User talk:Codf1977 ... I see no intersection between the Camcarson account, nor between the IP and Codf1977 themself. That said, I figured I'd let you take a look at the possible collateral "damage". Cheers. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and no problem Codf1977 (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki

A quick query to do with artists. If I create an artists profile on Wikipedia it is removed as promotion - yet major artists such as damien hirst, banksy etc have pages on wikipedia without issue. If all my artist profile does is place an entry about an artist, and explain their work - is this promotion? Is the case merely that when a person becomes famous enough it is no longer seen as promotion, i'm confused?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookieapple (talk • contribs) 12:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page-move vandal

Hi. We had another JarlaxleArtemis page-mover yesterday at User:Bao Qing Tian. I see you have deleted the user-page. I was coming anyway to ask you: when we get one of these, what else should be done after blocking and reverting? Is there any point adding these throwaway user accounts to some category or list of sockpuppets or to the WP:LTA page, or marking them somehow? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, this was already discussed once and the consensus was to WP:DENY recognition. No need to tag. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: speedy deletion of The Rhythm Messiahs

Hello NawlinWiki...

Your speedy deletion of the band The Rhythm Messiahs did not seem to take into account the content and talk pages which documented radio play, reviews, and free download audience size. If you were to have investigated the links provided, you would have seen that I documented that The Rhythm Messiahs albums have been downloaded 50,000+ times globally, was reviewed by WZRD and featured in a LoathMegaCorp (a Portland, Oregon art group) podcast. I realize that posting my own band/moniker does not bode well for objectivity, but if you had read the entry you would have noted that the language was neutral, except for a positive slant from the quoted WZRD review.

I don’t want to go into the philosophy on this… I’ll admit that The Rhythm Messiahs has not “gone gold” in a single country– but I believe the size of its audience (who download albums freely) and at least some USA college radio play (which is hard to document) merit a mention in a globally comprehensive encyclopedia (The Rhythm Messiahs have a globally dispersed audience, focused in the USA and Europe, but spread across 167 countries). I fear that Wikipedia may become too “mega-corp-press-incestuous” if it looks only at mainstream and not alternative presses and also college radio… but also new ways of distributing media, such as torrents.

A serious effort has been made on the part of Post Egoism Media to promote this band, with limited success… already, not “up and coming.” Again, maybe to get too philosophical, the Wikipedia “biodiversity” vs. “notability” requires drawing the line somewhere: I recognize this. But why shouldn’t brute “download” numbers count as much as mainstream media reviews that bands get simply because their label is well connected?

Even if you still believe The Rhythm Messiahs is not notable… and even merits a speedy deletion despite the moderate size of its download audience (enough to fill a college football stadium), I’d hope that in the future you might champion the notion that audience size (even limited fame) should be a factor in notability, as well as mainstream press coverage (prestige)… and that alternative presses and alternative media distribution channels such as torrents (and in some cases, even MySpace promotions), should count towards notability when they are verifiably successful to some degree and scale.

Thanks, J.D. Casten

Jdcasten (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: I take it that documenting two independent reviews is insufficient for notability.Jdcasten (talk) 16:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S.—that podcast was mentioned in a webpage that only introduced its audience to the band; by the letter of the law, I believe the documented WZRD review, which is independent, would be sufficient to establish the non-self-referential nature of The Rhythm Messiahs; but in the spirit of the law I’ll take your word for the prohibition on conflict of interest vis a vis me and my collaborators, even when it is based in citing an independent source or two. I’ll drop it here, and hope for additional reviews that spur a listener to create a The Rhythm Messiahs Wikipedia entry. Thanks again… for helping hone my understanding of Wikipedia protocol.Jdcasten (talk) 17:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WZRD review of The Rhythm Messiahs

Loathe Mega Corp write up of The Rhythm Messiahs

Jdcasten (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sparkle in Grey

Dear NawlinWiki...

I got your message about the delition of the Sparkle in Grey page. I don't agree with the fact that this page doesn't meet the notabilty requirements, for the following reasons: - there is a very simiar one in the Italian wikipedia. I think that having a translation in the English Wikipedia may be something good; - the artis/band colloborated with other artists wich are more 'notable', like Maurizio Bianchi and Tel La Homa, which pages contains referments to Sparkle in Grey; - the page doesn't contain sort of advertising or promotion sentences about the music or the band: it's just a normal info page. So please consider the idea of keeping it alive.

Thanks a lot, cheers,

Hue

HUE_GS 17:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kluge

Thank you for helping out. I appreciate it. Artintegrated (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion: Hitler bacon

I have nominated Hitler bacon, an article which you previously prodded, for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitler bacon. Cnilep (talk) 19:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking?

Can you explain this? I don't see any contributions or other evidence that this was a sock? It's got the staff members (especially Sara) baffled. Bastique demandez 20:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I usurped the account. It's now here. Bastique demandez 20:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was caused when User:JarlaxleArtemis created several sockpuppet accounts in the names of WMF staff members. If you go to Special:ListUsers, enter Sara Crouse (usurped), and then click the "Sort by creation date" box, you will see Jarlaxle vandal accounts that are now called User:Renamed vandal 84 and User:Renamed vandal 85, created shortly after the Sara Crouse account. 84 was User:Tomasz Finc and 85 was User:Domas Mituzas. They were renamed by User:Rdsmith4 on Feb. 12, 2009. Hope this helps, NawlinWiki (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks. That explains a lot. Bastique demandez 21:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rokkenhorse

Hi NawlinWiki. Please delete the Talk page for "Rokkenhorse" too; it looks like I finished writing and saved it just after you ninja-deleted the article page :) Thank you. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 04:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate (sport)

Thanks for your help with the vandal at the Ultimate article. I think he was also editing logged out as User:66.210.96.228, is there anything that could be done about that? --QuattroBajeena (talk) 01:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion of Sparkle in Grey

Hi again NawlinWiki,

As you suggested in your reply, I checked the notability criteria at this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MUSIC#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles


and, apart of the collaboration with notable artists and the presence on the Italian wikipedia, I think that Sparkle in Grey can meet the following criterias:


1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.

There are a lot of reviews, articles and interviews to the band in national (Italian) and international magazines and online magazines; you may eventually check here for a whole list: http://www.greysparkle.com/sig/album_07_aqp_reviews.htm

or here to see the most notable: France: http://www.autresdirections.net/article.php3?id_article=1526&Valider=go USA: http://thesilentballet.com/dnn/Home/tabid/36/ctl/Details/mid/367/ItemID/2155/Default.aspx Italy: http://www.greysparkle.com/sig/sparkle_in_grey-intervista-blowup.jpg Italy: http://www.rockit.it/intervista/735/sparkle-in-grey-mail Italy: http://www.greysparkle.com/sig/sparkle_in_grey-intervista-rockerilla.jpg


5. Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).

Albums of Sparkle in Grey and Sparle in Grey members/aliases were released by:

Digitalis Industries (USA), active since 1999 Afe Records (ITA) active since 1996 Disasters by Choice (ITA) active since 1999 Musica di un Certo Livello (ITA) active since 2004


12. Has been the subject of a half-hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network.

Sparkle in Grey have been interview on radio broadcast several times, you can find a list here as above (http://www.greysparkle.com/sig/album_07_aqp_reviews.htm) or eventually check some example or recording: - Notturna, Radio Popolare [national Italian radio network], by Renato Scuffietti, 18th June 2008, 0:40 - 1:30, telephone interview + tracks from "A Quiet Place" album http://www.radiopopolare.it/poplive/diretta/

Thanks a lot, cheers,


HUE_GS 12:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Michael Andaluz

Howdy,

Is the article archived anywhere since its deletion two days ago? Having to recreate it on another wiki database is a lot of work.

Thechagossians (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

James "Jimmy" Shuhan Lin Page Deletion

Not sure if you read my discussion page post, but Lin certainly has some local presence and significance withing the organization of Mu Alpha Theta, and as A7 of the Speedy Deletion rules page states, if there is any credible claim of relevance at all, even if not cited with sufficient evidence, the article cannot be deleted for the reason of lack of relevance. I did post that Lin has consistently scored well on the AMC test, or American Mathematics Contests, and has placed in several events at the Mu Alpha Theta National Convention in the years 2008 and 2009, both in his artwork for the club posters as well as in the Gemini contest, and helped his high school place 12th nationally. He also places is many local contests and his name has been published in several local newspapers, such as here http://rodeo.cincinnati.com/getlocal/gpstory.aspx?id=100050&sid=157653

Regardless of whether or not you have heard of him, Lin definitely has decent local relevance in the community as well as within the organization of Mu Alpha Theta, and this certainly falls under the description of a credible claim of relevance, and thus cannot be deleted for the reason you have posted.

Ramsfan256 00:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Re: Speedy deletion of Sparkle in Grey

Hi again NawlinWiki,

I read your kind reply about reporting the sources used in my previous reply up here.

So I'll do as you suggest: I'll use them and then re-create the article (next week I think).

Thanks a lot, cheers,


HUE_GS 17:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance and IT Security Micro Governance

Hi,

I'm wondering if you read the discussion page of both articles where I mention that I have the author's permission to post the two articles. Actually it goes further, where he asked me, to post them rather than I having to ask for his permission.

Also, I emailed the pemissions email for Wiki, 2 days ago giving proof of said email, but with no response. So, I shall post said email here once again.

From: RonL@ere-security.ca To: stevensdas@hotmail.com Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:53:25 -0500 Subject: Dan: ERE 2 articles for Wikipedia please

Hi Dan:

Please: 1. publish the attached two articles on Wikipedia. 2. Make the links live. 3. Publish the descriptive graphs but if necessary no need to publish the photographs / graphics surrounding the article. 4. Please let me know when complete

Ron Lepofsky ERE Information Security Auditors 10 Parsons Court, First Floor, Thornhill, Ont. L4J 6Z4 Kindly acknowledge so I know you received this correspondence.

Thank you and regards, Ron L

Ron Lepofsky, B.A.SC. (Mech Eng), CISSP President ERE Information Security Auditors Office: 905 764 3246 Cell: 416 723 3246 www.ere-security.ca www.ere-security.com

I would like to repost the two articles once again, with your permission, now that I have shown the exact email regarding the author's permission of the two articles that have been speedily deleted.

Thanks,


Dan 1:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Speedy Deletion of Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance and IT Security Micro Governance

Hi,

If not Wikipedia, which part of WIKI would you think these articles would fit into? Wikibooks? It would be very helpful if you could tell me.

Cheers,

Dan

Weird edit summaries

What's going on with this user's edit summaries? They're just adding spaces to articles with the same edit summary full of redlinks. Does this qualify as disruptive editing? XXX antiuser eh? 23:05, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, they're blocked. Call me captain slow... XXX antiuser eh? 23:05, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

deleted article

Hello there, I noticed the article I created called Myagi Australia was deleted. I didn't even get a chance to discuss it as it was promptly deleted. I think the notability was there, sources, references for a an Australian company. Going by your logic, you should delete Kogan Technologies as well because it is similarly based article on an Australian company. The article I wrote wasn't any advertising or cheerleading, it was just a company stub similar to the company stubs everywhere in the wikipedia.Takamaxa (talk) 08:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse Me? What's The Problem?!

Look, my wiki on my site was deleted! GOOGLE AND YAHOO GET TO BE ON WIKIPEDIA BUT NOT PUDINCE! This is ridiculous and it was mentioned in the article; "This page is not for advertismental purposes" SO WHAT IS THE BIG IDEA?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pudince (talk • contribs) 12:48, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Account compromise

I switched from User:Qwerty449 to User:Qwerty451 because my former account was hijacked. Can you revert - with fulfilling my all requests - and block former User:Qwerty449 account - he vandalizes VRML and X3D? Qwerty451 (talk) 19:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hijacker of my former account strikes back in VRML and X3D, please block him, thanks. Qwerty451 (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Please add to VRML#cite_note-3 missing Media Machines Management title, because it is internal title of page used as reference. Now this reference shows only titleless number with brackets which looks ugly and weird. I ask this because article is protected and I cannot do this from my new account. Qwerty451 (talk) 19:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy Deletion of Spose

The only reason I considered Spose to be notable is because it was featured on KROQ for possible airtime, which is one of the most (if not the most) influential radio stations in the United States. I understand if you mistook it for a 'garage band' add, but I have no knowledge of him apart from the two sources that I cited. Sanzoneja (talk) 22:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article recreated

Hi there. Just want to inform you that the article which you deleted has been recreated by the same editor. Amsaim (talk) 00:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request Article Review

{{helpme}} Hi NawlinWiki - Per the comment on notability, I've edited the MyBuilder article on my specials page (26 Feb) to include multiple references. Can I please have it reviewed now that I've added references? Many thanks for your input.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_42&oldid=1143190868"