War in Afghanistan (2001–2021): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 24.82.7.81 to last version by ESkog (HG)
Line 345: Line 345:
{{main|Civilian casualties of the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)}}
{{main|Civilian casualties of the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)}}


According to Marc W. Herold's [http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mwherold/ Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing] at least 3,700 and probably closer to 5,000 civilians were killed by the end of 2002 as a result of U.S. bombing.<ref name="news_bbc_co_uk17">{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1740538.stm | title = news.bbc.co.uk | accessdate = 2007-09-27 | publisher = }}</ref> Herold's study omitted those killed indirectly, when air strikes cut off their access to hospitals, food or electricity. Also exempt were bomb victims who later died of their injuries. When there were different casualty figures from the same incident, in 90% of cases Professor Herold chose a lower figure.
According to Marc W. Herold's [http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mwherold/ Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing] at least 37000 and probably closer to 500000 civilians children were killed by the end of 2002 as a result of U.S. bombing.<ref name="news_bbc_co_uk17">{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1740538.stm | title = news.bbc.co.uk | accessdate = 2007-09-27 | publisher = }}</ref> Herold's study omitted those killed indirectly, when air strikes cut off their access to hospitals, food or electricity. Also exempt were bomb victims who later died of their injuries. When there were different casualty figures from the same incident, in 90% of cases Professor Herold chose a lower figure.


Some people, however, dispute Herold's estimates. [[Joshua Muravchik]] of the [[American Enterprise Institute]] and [[Carl Conetta]] of the [[Project on Defense Alternatives]] question Herold's heavy use of the [[Afghan Islamic Press]] (the Taliban's official mouthpiece) and claim tallies provided them were suspicious. Conetta also claims statistical errors in Herold's study.<ref name="www_comw_org18">{{cite web | url = http://www.comw.org/pda/0201oef.html#appendix2 | title = comw.org | accessdate = 2007-09-27 | publisher = }}</ref><ref name="www_weeklystandard_com19">{{cite web | url = http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/565otmps.asp?pg=1 | title = weeklystandard.com | accessdate = 2007-09-27 | publisher = }}</ref> Conetta's study puts total civilian casualties between 1,000 and 1,300.<ref name="www_comw_org20">{{cite web | url = http://www.comw.org/pda/0201oef.html#appendix1 | title = comw.org | accessdate = 2007-09-27 | publisher = }}</ref> A [[Los Angeles Times]] study put the number of collateral dead between 1,067 and 1,201.
Some people, however, dispute Herold's estimates. [[Joshua Muravchik]] of the [[American Enterprise Institute]] and [[Carl Conetta]] of the [[Project on Defense Alternatives]] question Herold's heavy use of the [[Afghan Islamic Press]] (the Taliban's official mouthpiece) and claim tallies provided them were suspicious. Conetta also claims statistical errors in Herold's study.<ref name="www_comw_org18">{{cite web | url = http://www.comw.org/pda/0201oef.html#appendix2 | title = comw.org | accessdate = 2007-09-27 | publisher = }}</ref><ref name="www_weeklystandard_com19">{{cite web | url = http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/565otmps.asp?pg=1 | title = weeklystandard.com | accessdate = 2007-09-27 | publisher = }}</ref> Conetta's study puts total civilian casualties between 1,000 and 1,300.<ref name="www_comw_org20">{{cite web | url = http://www.comw.org/pda/0201oef.html#appendix1 | title = comw.org | accessdate = 2007-09-27 | publisher = }}</ref> A [[Los Angeles Times]] study put the number of collateral dead between 1,067 and 1,201.

Revision as of 02:24, 1 August 2008

War in Afghanistan (2001–present)
Part of the War on Terrorism, Civil war in Afghanistan

U.S. and UK forces in Helmand province, 2007.
DateOctober 7, 2001–present
Location
Status

Conflict ongoing

Belligerents
Afghanistan Taliban
al-Qaeda
IMU
Hezbi Islami
Lashkar-e-Toiba
Jaish-e-Mohammed[1]
Hizbul Mujahideen
Afghanistan Northern Alliance (UIF)
International Security Assistance Force
Operation Enduring Freedom Allies
Afghanistan Afghanistan
Commanders and leaders
Afghanistan Mohammed Omar
Afghanistan Obaidullah Akhund (POW)
Afghanistan Mullah Dadullah 
Afghanistan Jalaluddin Haqqani
Osama bin Laden
Ayman al-Zawahiri
Mustafa Abu al-Yazid
Tohir Yo‘ldosh
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar
Sirajuddin Haqqani
Baitullah Mehsud
Afghanistan Bismillah Khan
Afghanistan Mohammed Fahim
Afghanistan Abdul Rashid Dostum
United States Tommy Franks
United States William J. Fallon
United States Martin Dempsey
United States David D. McKiernan
Canada Ray Henault
Canada Rick Hillier
Canada Walter Natynczyk
Italy Mauro del Vecchio (ISAF)
United Kingdom David Richards (ISAF)
United States Dan McNeill (ISAF)
Netherlands Egon Ramms (NATO)
Strength
Taliban: 10,000-30,000
Haqqani militia: 1,000
Hezbi Islami: 1,000[2]
IMU: 1,000-10,000[3]
Mehsud militia: 30,000[4]
Afghan Army: 76,000[5]
U.S. (non-ISAF): 18,000[6]
ISAF/NATO: 52,700 (10 June 2008)[7]
Casualties and losses
24,000+ killed since 2001[citation needed]
Detainees: 28,000+[8]

(July 2008)
Afghan security forces: 3,100 killed
Northern Alliance:
200 killed[9][10][11]
Coalition:
902 killed (US:561, UK: 114, Canada:88, Others: 139[12])
2,495+ wounded

(US 2,290, Canada 275, UK 140, Germany 70, Other 80+ [13])
Contractors:
83 KIA
2,428 WIA[14]
Civilian casualties: ~20,000[15]

Template:Campaignbox War on Terrorism

The War in Afghanistan, which began on October 7, 2001, was launched by the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. It was the beginning of the War on Terror. The stated purpose of the invasion was to capture Osama bin Laden, destroy al-Qaeda, and remove the Taliban regime which had provided support and safe harbor to al-Qaeda.

Two military operations in Afghanistan seek to stabilize the country. Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) is a combat operation involving coalition partners led by the United States against Al Qaeda remnants, primarily in the eastern and southern parts of the country along the Pakistan border. OEF is not a NATO operation, although many coalition partners are NATO members. Approximately 20,000 troops are in OEF, including approximately 18,000 U.S. forces. The second operation is the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), established by the international community in 2002 to stabilize the country. NATO assumed control of ISAF the following year. By May 2008, ISAF had an estimated 47,000 troops from 40 countries, with NATO members providing the core of the force. The United States has approximately 17,000 troops in ISAF.

The U.S. and the UK led the aerial bombing campaign, with ground forces supplied primarily by the Afghan Northern Alliance. In 2002, American, British and Canadian infantry were committed, along with special forces from several allied nations. Later, NATO troops were added.

Operation Enduring Freedom - Afghanistan, which is a joint U.S. and Afghan operation, with some involvement from other nations, is separate from the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), which is an operation of NATO nations including the U.S. The two operations run in parallel.

The initial attack removed the Taliban from power, but Taliban forces have since regained some strength.[16] The war has been less successful in achieving the goal of restricting al-Qaeda's movement.[17] Since 2006, Afghanistan has seen threats to its stability from increased Taliban-led insurgent activity, growing illegal drug production, and a fragile government with limited control outside of Kabul.[18]

Background: 1996-2001

From May 1996, Osama bin Laden had been living in Afghanistan along with other members of al-Qaeda, operating terrorist training camps in a loose alliance with the Taliban.[19] Following the 1998 US embassy bombings in Africa, the US military launched submarine-based cruise missiles at these camps with limited effect on their overall operations.

The UN Security Council had issued Resolutions 1267 and 1333 in 1999 and 2000 directed towards the Taliban which applied financial and military hardware sanctions to encourage them to turn over bin Laden for trial in the deadly bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa in August 1998, and close terrorist training camps.

September 11, 2001 attacks

Six days after the events of September 11, 2001, U.S. President George W. Bush identified Osama bin Laden as the 'prime suspect' in the attacks.[20] Osama bin Laden was understood to be in Afghanistan at the time. On 20 September 2001, in an address to a joint session of Congress, President Bush issued an ultimatum[21] demanding that the Taliban government of Afghanistan:

  • deliver al-Qaeda leaders located in Afghanistan to the United States
  • release all imprisoned foreign nationals, including American citizens[22]
  • protect foreign journalists, diplomats, and aid workers in Afghanistan
  • close terrorist training camps in Afghanistan and "hand over every terrorist and every person and their support structure to appropriate authorities"
  • give the United States full access to terrorist training camps to verify their closure

"They will hand over the terrorists or they will share in their fate" said Bush. No specifics were attached to the threat, though there followed a statement suggesting military action: "Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there."

The Taliban government responded through their embassy in Pakistan, asserting that there was no evidence in their possession linking bin Laden to the September 11 attacks. They also stressed that bin Laden was a guest in their country. Pashtun and Taliban codes of behavior require that guests be granted hospitality and asylum.[23][24]

On September 22, 2001, the United Arab Emirates, and on the following day, Saudi Arabia withdrew their recognition of the Taliban as the legal government of Afghanistan, leaving neighboring Pakistan as the only remaining country with diplomatic ties.

On October 7, 2001, before the onset of military hostilities, the Taliban offered to try bin Laden in Afghanistan in an Islamic court[25]. This offer was rejected by the U.S., and the bombing of targets within Afghanistan by U.S. and British forces commenced the same day.

October 14, 2001, seven days into the U.S./British bombing campaign, the Taliban offered to surrender Osama bin Laden to a third country for trial, if the bombing halted and they were shown evidence of his involvement in the September 11 terrorist attacks. This offer was also rejected by U.S. President Bush, who declared "There's no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he's guilty."[26]

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) did not authorize the U.S.-led military campaign in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom). There is some debate as to whether UNSC authorization was required, centered around the question of whether the invasion was an act of collective self-defense provided for under Article 51 of the UN Charter, or an act of aggression.[27]

Also, the U.S. Administration did not officially declare war, and labelled Taliban troops and supporters terrorists rather than soldiers, denying them the protections of the Geneva Convention and due process of law. This position has been successfully challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court[28] and questioned even by military lawyers responsible for prosecuting affected prisoners.[29]

On December 20, 2001, the UNSC did authorize the creation of an International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) with authority to take all measures necessary to fulfill its mandate of assisting the Afghan Interim Authority in maintaining security.[30] Command of the ISAF passed to NATO on August 11, 2003.[31]

2001: Initial attack

See also: October 2001, November 2001, December 2001, January 2002, 2001 in Afghanistan

On October 7th, 2001, strikes were reported in the capital, Kabul (where electricity supplies were severed), at the airport and military nerve-centre of Kandahar (home of the Taliban's Supreme Leader Mullah Omar), and also in the city of Jalalabad.

At 17:00 UTC, President Bush confirmed the strikes on national television and British Prime Minister Tony Blair also addressed the UK. Bush stated that at the same time as Taliban military and terrorists' training grounds would be targeted, food, medicine, and supplies would be dropped to "the starving and suffering men, women and children of Afghanistan." [32].

CNN released exclusive footage of Kabul being bombed to all the American broadcasters at approximately 5:08pm October 7, 2001. [33] A number of different technologies were employed in the strike. US Air Force general Richard Myers, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated that approximately 50 Tomahawk cruise missiles, launched by British and U.S. submarines and ships, 25 strike aircraft from US aircraft carriers, USS Carl Vinson and USS Enterprise and 15 US Air Force bombers, such as B-1 Lancer, B-2 Spirit, B-52 Stratofortress were involved in the first wave, launched from Diego Garcia. Two C-17 Globemaster transport jets were to deliver 37,500 daily rations by airdrop to refugees inside Afghanistan on the first day of the attack.

A pre-recorded videotape of Osama bin Laden had been released before the attack in which he condemned any attacks against Afghanistan. Al Jazeera, the Arabic satellite news channel, reported that these tapes were received shortly before the attack. In this recording bin Laden claimed that the United States would fail in Afghanistan and then collapse, just as the Soviet Union did, and called for a jihad, against the U.S.

Initial air campaigns

Bombers operating at high altitudes well out of range of anti-aircraft fire bombed the al-Qaeda training camps and Taliban air defenses. During the initial build-up preceding the actual attack, there had been speculation in the media that the Taliban might try to use U.S.-built Stinger anti-aircraft missiles that were the bane of Soviet helicopters during the Soviet occupation in the 1980s. If any of these missiles existed at the time of the air campaign, they were never used and the U.S. didn't lose any aircraft to enemy fire. Beyond that, the Taliban had little to offer in the way of anti-aircraft weaponry, relying mostly on left-over arms and weapons from the Soviet invasion. U.S. aircraft, including Apache helicopter gunships, operated with impunity throughout the campaign.

The strikes initially focused on the area in and around the cities of Kabul, Jalalabad, and Kandahar. Within a few days, most al-Qaeda training sites were severely damaged and the Taliban's air defenses were destroyed. The campaign then focused on command, control, and communication targets which weakened the ability of the Taliban forces to communicate. However, the line facing the Afghan Northern Alliance held, and no tangible battlefield successes had yet occurred on that front. Two weeks into the campaign, the Northern Alliance demanded the air campaign focus more on the front lines. As the war dragged on civilian casualties also began to mount in the affected areas. Meanwhile, thousands of Pashtun militiamen from Pakistan poured into the country, reinforcing the Taliban against the U.S. led forces.

The next stage of the campaign began with carrier based F/A-18 Hornet fighter-bombers hitting Taliban vehicles in pinpoint strikes, while other U.S. planes began cluster bombing Taliban defenses. For the first time in years, Northern Alliance commanders finally began to see the serious results that they had long hoped for on the front lines. The Taliban support structure began to erode under the pressure of the air-strikes. U.S. Special Forces then launched an audacious raid deep into the Taliban's heartland of Kandahar, even striking one of Mullah Omar's compounds.[citation needed] However, the campaign's progress seemed to remain very slow.

At the beginning of November, the Taliban front lines were bombed with 15,000-pound daisy cutter bombs, and by AC-130 gunships. The Taliban fighters had no previous experience with American firepower, and often even stood on top of bare ridgelines where Special Forces could easily spot them and call in close air support. By November 2, Taliban frontal positions were decimated, and a Northern Alliance march on Kabul seemed possible for the first time. Foreign fighters from al-Qaeda took over security in the Afghan cities, demonstrating the instability of the Taliban regime. Meanwhile, the Northern Alliance and their CIA/Special Forces advisors planned the next stage of their offensive. Northern Alliance troops would seize Mazari Sharif, thereby cutting off Taliban supply lines and enabling the flow of equipment from the countries to the north, followed by an attack on Kabul itself.

Areas most targeted

During the early months of the war the US military had a limited presence on the ground. The plan was that special forces, and intelligence officers with a military background, would serve as liaisons with Afghan militias opposed to the Taliban, would advance after the cohesiveness of the Taliban forces was disrupted by American air power.[34][35][36]

The Tora Bora Mountains lie roughly east of Afghanistan's capital Kabul, which is itself close to the border with Pakistan. American intelligence analysts believed that the Taliban and al Qaeda had dug in to a fortified networks of well-supplied caves and underground bunkers. The area was subjected to a heavy continuous bombardment by B52 bombers.[34][35][36][37]

The U.S. forces and the Northern Alliance also began to diverge in their objectives. While the U.S. was continuing the search for Osama bin Laden, the Northern Alliance was pressuring for more support in their efforts to finish off the Taliban and control the country.

Scott Peterson, writing in the Christian Science Monitor, quoted a defector he described as the Taliban deputy interior minister, and "highest ranking Taliban defector to date".[38] According to to Peterson this defector described the American bombardment as very effective:

  • "Kabul city has seen many rockets, but this was a different thing."
  • "The American bombing of Taliban trenches, cars, and troops caused us to be defeated. All ways were blocked, so there was no way to carry food or ammunition to the front. All trenches of the Taliban were destroyed, and many people were killed."

In the early months of the war there were reports of several friendly fire incidents.[39][40]

Battle for Mazari Sharif

U.S. Forces work with the Northern Alliance on Horseback on November 12, 2001.

On November 9, 2001, the battle for Mazari Sharif began. Mazari Sharif is a large city north of the Hindu Kush mountain range that bisects Afghanistan. There are enclaves of Pashtun speaking communities in the area, so, unlike much of Northern Afghanistan, the Taliban had a stronger presence there.[38] U.S. bombers carpet-bombed Taliban defenders concentrated in the Chesmay-e-Safa gorge that marks the entrance to the city. At 2 p.m., Northern Alliance forces then swept in from the south and west, seizing the city's main military base and airport. The forces then mopped up the remnants of the Taliban in the gorge in front of the city, meeting only light resistance. Within 4 hours, the battle was over. By sunset, what remained of the Taliban was retreating to the south and east. Mazari Sharif was taken. The next day, Northern Alliance forces seeking retribution combed the city, shooting suspected Taliban supporters in on-the-spot executions. Approximately 520 Taliban, demoralized and defeated, many of whom were fighters from Pakistan, were shot when they were discovered hiding in a school. Looting was also widespread throughout Mazari Sharif.

The same day the massacres of former Taliban supporters were taking place in Mazari Sharif, November 10, Northern Alliance forces swept through five northern provinces in a rapid advance. The fall of Mazari Sharif had triggered a complete collapse of Taliban positions. Many local commanders switched sides rather than fight. The regime was beginning to unravel at the seams throughout the north. Many of their front line troops were outflanked and then surrounded in the northern city of Kunduz as the Northern Alliance drove past them southwards. Even in the south, their hold on power seemed tenuous at best. The religious police stopped their regular patrols. A complete implosion of the Taliban regime seemed imminent.

The fall of Kabul

Finally, on the night of November 12, Taliban forces fled from the city of Kabul, leaving under cover of darkness. By the time Northern Alliance forces arrived in the afternoon of November 13, only bomb craters, burned foliage, and the burnt out shells of Taliban gun emplacements and positions were there to greet them. A group of about twenty hardline Arab fighters hiding in the city's park were the only remaining defenders. This Taliban group was killed in a brief 15-minute gun battle, being heavily outnumbered and having had little more than some shrub to shield them. After these forces were neutralized Kabul was in the hands of the US/NATO forces and the Northern Alliance.

The fall of Kabul marked the beginning of a collapse of Taliban positions across the map. Within 24 hours, all of the Afghan provinces along the Iranian border, including the key city of Herat, had fallen. Local Pashtun commanders and warlords had taken over throughout northeastern Afghanistan, including the key city of Jalalabad. Taliban holdouts in the north, mainly Pakistani volunteers, fell back to the northern city of Kunduz to make a stand. By November 16, the Taliban's last stronghold in northern Afghanistan was besieged by the Northern Alliance. Nearly 10,000 Taliban fighters, led by foreign fighters, refused to surrender and continued to put up resistance. By then, the Taliban had been forced back to their heartland in southeastern Afghanistan around Kandahar.

By November 13, al-Qaeda and Taliban forces, with the possible inclusion of Osama bin Laden, had regrouped and were concentrating their forces in the Tora Bora cave complex, on the Pakistan border 50 kilometers (30 mi) southwest of Jalalabad, to prepare for a stand against the Northern Alliance and US/NATO forces. Nearly 2,000 al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters fortified themselves in positions within bunkers and caves, and by November 16, U.S. bombers began bombing the mountain fortress. Around the same time, CIA and Special Forces operatives were already at work in the area, enlisting and paying local warlords to join the fight and planning an attack on the Tora Bora complex.

The fall of Kunduz

Just as the bombardment at Tora Bora was stepped up, the siege of Kunduz that began on November 16 was continuing. Finally, after nine days of heavy fighting and American aerial bombardment, Taliban fighters surrendered to Northern Alliance forces on November 25-November 26. Shortly before the surrender, Pakistani aircraft arrived ostensibly to evacuate a few hundred intelligence and military personnel who had been in Afghanistan previous to the U.S. invasion for the purpose of aiding the Taliban's ongoing fight against the Northern Alliance. However, during this airlift, it is alleged that up to five thousand people were evacuated from the region, including Taliban and al-Qaeda troops allied to the Pakistanis in Afghanistan. [41][42][43]

On November 25, the day that Taliban fighters holding out in Kunduz finally surrendered and were being herded into the Qala-i-Jangi fortress near Mazar-I-Sharif, a few Taliban attacked some Northern Alliance guards, taking their weapons and opening fire. This incident soon triggered a widespread revolt by 300 prisoners, who soon seized the southern half of the complex, once a medieval fortress, including an armory stocked with small arms and crew-served weapons. One American CIA operative who had been interrogating prisoners, Johnny Micheal Spann, was killed, marking the first American combat death in the war. The revolt was finally put down after seven days of heavy fighting between an SBS unit along with some Green berets and Northern Alliance, AC-130 gunships and other aircraft took part providing strafing fire on several occasions, as well as a bombing airstrikes.[44] 86 of the Taliban prisoners survived, and around 50 Northern Alliance soldiers were killed. The quashing of the revolt marked the end of the combat in northern Afghanistan, where local Northern Alliance warlords were now firmly in control.

Consolidation: the taking of Kandahar

By the end of November, Kandahar, the movement's birthplace, was the last remaining Taliban stronghold and was coming under increasing pressure. Nearly 3,000 tribal fighters, led by Hamid Karzai, a Westernized and polished loyalist of the former Afghan king, and Gul Agha Sherzai, the governor of Kandahar before the Taliban seized power, put pressure on Taliban forces from the east and cut off the northern Taliban supply lines to Kandahar. The threat of the Northern Alliance loomed in the north and northeast. Meanwhile, the first significant U.S. combat troops had arrived. Nearly 1,000 Marines, ferried in by CH-53E Super Stallion helicopters, set up a Forward Operating Base known as Camp Rhino in the desert south of Kandahar on November 25. This was the coalition's first strategic foothold in Afghanistan, and was the stepping stone to establishing other operating bases. The first significant combat involving U.S. ground forces occurred a day after Rhino was captured when 15 armored vehicles approached the base and were attacked by helicopter gunships, destroying many of them. Meanwhile, the airstrikes continued to pound Taliban positions inside the city, where Mullah Omar was holed up. Omar, the Taliban leader, remained defiant despite the fact that his movement only controlled 4 out of the 30 Afghan provinces by the end of November and called on his forces to fight to the death.

File:FranksWithArmySF.jpg
Tommy Franks meets with Army Special Forces.

As the Taliban teetered on the brink of losing their last bastion, the U.S. focus increased on the Tora Bora. Local tribal militias, numbering over 2,000 strong and paid and organized by Special Forces and CIA paramilitaries, continued to mass for an attack as heavy bombing continued of suspected al-Qaeda positions. 100-200 civilians were reported killed when 25 bombs struck a village at the foot of the Tora Bora and White Mountains region. On December 2, a group of 20 U.S. commandos was inserted by helicopter to support the operation. On December 5, Afghan militia wrested control of the low ground below the mountain caves from al-Qaeda fighters and set up tank positions to blast enemy forces. The al-Qaeda fighters withdrew with mortars, rocket launchers, and assault rifles to higher fortified positions and dug in for the battle.

By December 6, Omar finally began to signal that he was ready to surrender Kandahar to tribal forces. His forces broken by heavy U.S. bombing and living constantly on the run within Kandahar to prevent himself from becoming a target, even Mullah Omar's morale lagged. Recognizing that he could not hold on to Kandahar much longer, he began signaling a willingness in negotiations to turn the city over to the tribal leaders, assuming that he and his top men received some protection. The U.S. government rejected any amnesty for Omar or any Taliban leaders. On December 7, Mullah Mohammad Omar slipped out of the city of Kandahar with a group of his hardcore loyalists and moved northwest into the mountains of Uruzgan Province, reneging on the Taliban's promise to surrender their fighters and their weapons. He was last reported seen driving off with a group of his fighters on a convoy of motorcycles. Other members of the Taliban leadership fled into Pakistan through the remote passes of Paktia and Paktika Provinces. Nevertheless, Kandahar, the last Taliban-controlled city, had fallen, and the majority of the Taliban fighters had disbanded. The border town of Spin Boldak was surrendered on the same day, marking the end of Taliban control in Afghanistan. The Afghan tribal forces under Gul Agha seized the city of Kandahar while the Marines took control of the airport outside and established a U.S. base.

Battle of Tora Bora

Al-Qaeda fighters were still holding out in the mountains of Tora Bora, however, while an anti-Taliban tribal militia steadily pushed bin Laden back across the difficult terrain, backed by withering air strikes guided in by U.S. and UK Special Forces. Facing defeat, the al-Qaeda forces agreed to a truce to give them time to surrender their weapons. In retrospect, however, many believe that the truce was a ruse to allow important al-Qaeda figures, including Osama bin Laden, to escape. On December 12, the fighting flared again, probably initiated by a rear guard buying time for the main force's escape through the White Mountains into the tribal areas of Pakistan. Once again, tribal forces backed by British and U.S. special operations troops and air support pressed ahead against fortified al-Qaeda positions in caves and bunkers scattered throughout the mountainous region. By December 17, the last cave complex had been taken and their defenders overrun. A search of the area by U.S. and UK forces continued into January, but no sign of bin Laden or the al-Qaeda leadership emerged. It is almost unanimously believed that they had already slipped away into the tribal areas of Pakistan to the south and east. It is estimated that around 200 of the al-Qaeda fighters were killed during the battle, along with an unknown number of anti-Taliban tribal fighters. No U.S. or UK deaths were reported.

2002: Operation Anaconda

File:OperationAnacondaChinook.jpg
Soldiers board a Chinook in Operation Anaconda.

Following Tora Bora, U.S. forces and their Afghan allies consolidated their position in the country. Following a Loya jirga or grand council of major Afghan factions, tribal leaders, and former exiles, an interim Afghan government was established in Kabul under Hamid Karzai. U.S. forces established their main base at Bagram airbase just north of Kabul. Kandahar airport also became an important U.S. base area. Several outposts were established in eastern provinces to hunt for Taliban and al-Qaeda fugitives. The number of U.S-led coalition troops operating in the country would eventually grow to over 10,000. Meanwhile, the Taliban and al-Qaeda had not given up. Al-Qaeda forces began regrouping in the Shahi-Kot mountains of Paktia province throughout January and February 2002. A Taliban fugitive in Paktia province, Mullah Saifur Rehman, also began reconstituting some of his militia forces in support of the anti-U.S. fighters. They totalled over 1,000 by the beginning of March 2002. The intention of the insurgents was to use the region as a base area for launching guerrilla attacks and possibly a major offensive in the style of the Mujahideen who battled Soviet forces during the 1980s.

U.S. and allied Afghan militia intelligence sources soon picked up on this buildup in Paktia province and prepared a massive push to counter it. On March 2, 2002, U.S. and Afghan forces launched an offensive on al-Qaeda and Taliban forces entrenched in the mountains of Shahi-Kot southeast of Gardez. The jihadist forces, who used small arms, rocket-propelled grenades, and mortars, were entrenched into caves and bunkers in the hillsides at an altitude that was largely above 10,000 feet (3,000 m). They used "hit and run" tactics, opening fire on the U.S. and Afghan forces and then retreating back into their caves and bunkers to weather the return fire and persistent U.S. bombing raids. To compound the situation for the coalition troops, U.S. commanders initially underestimated the Taliban and al-Qaeda forces as a last isolated pocket numbering fewer than 200. It turned out that the guerrillas numbered between 1,000-5,000 according to some estimates and that they were receiving reinforcements.[45]

An Anti-Taliban Forces (ATF) fighter wraps a bandolier of ammunition for his 7.62mm PK Kalashinkov machine gun around his body as ATF personnel help secure a compound in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan, January 2002.

By March 6, eight Americans and seven Afghan soldiers had been killed and reportedly 400 opposing forces had also been killed in the fighting. The coalition casualties stemmed from a friendly fire incident that killed one soldier, the downing of two helicopters by rocket-propelled grenades and small arms fire that killed seven soldiers, and the pinning down of U.S. forces being inserted into what was coined as "Objective Ginger" that resulted in dozens of wounded.[46] However, several hundred guerrillas escaped the dragnet heading to the Waziristan tribal areas across the border in Pakistan.

During Operation Anaconda and other missions during 2002 and 2003, special forces from several western nations were also involved in operations. These included the Australian Special Air Service Regiment, the Canadian Joint Task Force 2, the German KSK, the New Zealand Special Air Service and Norwegian Marinejegerkommandoen.

Post-Anaconda operations

Following the battle at Shahi-Kot, it is believed that the al-Qaeda fighters established sanctuaries among tribal protectors in Pakistan, from which they regained their strength and later began launching cross-border raids on U.S. forces by the summer months of 2002. Guerrilla units, numbering between 5 and 25 men, still regularly crossed the border from their sanctuaries in Pakistan to fire rockets at U.S. bases and ambush American convoys and patrols, as well as Afghan National Army troops, Afghan militia forces working with the U.S-led coalition, and non-governmental organizations. The area around the U.S. base at Shkin in Paktika province saw some of the heaviest activity.

Meanwhile, Taliban forces continued to remain in hiding in the rural regions of the four southern provinces that formed their heartland, Kandahar, Zabul, Helmand Province, and Uruzgan. In the wake of Operation Anaconda The Pentagon requested that British Royal Marines who are highly trained in mountain warfare[9], be deployed. They conducted a number of missions over several weeks with varying results. The Taliban, who during the summer of 2002 numbered in the hundreds, avoided combat with U.S. forces and their Afghan allies as much as possible and melted away into the caves and tunnels of remote Afghan mountain ranges or across the border into Pakistan during operations.[47]

2003-2005: Renewed Taliban insurgency

After managing to evade U.S. forces throughout the summer of 2002, the remnants of the Taliban gradually began to regain their confidence and started to begin preparations to launch the insurgency that Mullah Muhammad Omar had promised during the Taliban's last days in power.[48] During September, Taliban forces began a recruitment drive in Pashtun areas in both Afghanistan and Pakistan to launch a renewed "jihad" or holy war against the Afghan government and the U.S-led coalition. Pamphlets distributed in secret during the night also began to appear in many villages in the former Taliban heartland in southeastern Afghanistan that called for jihad.[49] Small mobile training camps were established along the border with Pakistan by al-Qaeda and Taliban fugitives to train new recruits in guerrilla warfare and terrorist tactics, according to Afghan sources and a United Nations report.[50] Most of the new recruits were drawn from the madrassas or religious schools of the tribal areas of Pakistan, from which the Taliban had originally arisen. Major bases, a few with as many as 200 men, were created in the mountainous tribal areas of Pakistan by the summer of 2003. The will of the Pakistani paramilitaries stationed at border crossings to prevent such infiltration was called into question, and Pakistani military operations proved of little use.[51]

The Taliban gradually reorganized and reconstituted their forces over the winter, preparing for a summer offensive. They established a new mode of operation: gathered into groups of around 50 to launch attacks on isolated outposts and convoys of Afghan soldiers, police, or militia and then breaking up into groups of 5-10 men to evade subsequent offensives. U.S. forces in the strategy were attacked indirectly, through rocket attacks on bases and improvised explosive devices. To coordinate the strategy, Mullah Omar named a 10-man leadership council for the resistance, with himself at the head.[51] Five operational zones were created, assigned to various Taliban commanders such as the key Taliban leader Mullah Dadullah, in charge of Zabul province operations.[51] Al-Qaeda forces in the east had a bolder strategy of concentrating on the Americans and catching them when they could with elaborate ambushes.

The first sign that Taliban forces were regrouping came on January 27, 2003, during Operation Mongoose, when a band of fighters allied with the Taliban and Hezb-i-Islami were discovered and assaulted by U.S. forces at the Adi Ghar cave complex 15 miles (24 km) north of Spin Boldak.[52] 18 rebels were reported killed and no U.S. casualties reported. The site was suspected to be a base to funnel supplies and fighters from Pakistan. The first isolated attacks by relatively large Taliban bands on Afghan targets also appeared around that time.

Marines searching for Taliban fighters in the spring of 2005.

As the summer continued, the attacks gradually increased in frequency in the "Taliban heartland." Dozens of Afghan government soldiers, non-governmental organization and humanitarian workers, and several U.S. soldiers died in the raids, ambushes, and rocket attacks. In addition to the guerrilla attacks, Taliban fighters began building up their forces in the district of Dai Chopan, a district in Zabul Province that also straddles Kandahar and Uruzgan and is at the very center of the Taliban heartland. Dai Chopan district is a remote and sparsely populated corner of southeastern Afghanistan composed of towering, rocky mountains interspersed with narrow gorges. Taliban fighters decided it would be the perfect area to make a stand against the Afghan government and the coalition forces. Over the course of the summer, perhaps the largest concentration of Taliban militants gathered in the area since the fall of the regime, with up to 1,000 guerrillas regrouping. Over 220 people, including several dozen Afghan police, were killed in August 2003 as Taliban fighters gained strength.

Coalition response

As a result, coalition forces began preparing offensives to root out the rebel forces. In late August 2005, Afghan government forces backed by U.S troops and heavy American aerial bombardment advanced upon Taliban positions within the mountain fortress. After a one-week battle, Taliban forces were routed with up to 124 fighters (according to Afghan government estimates) killed. Taliban spokesmen, however, denied the high casualty figure and U.S estimates were somewhat lower.

2006: NATO in southern Afghanistan

From January 2006, a NATO International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) force started to replace the U.S. troops of Operation Enduring Freedom in southern Afghanistan. The British 16th Air Assault Brigade (later reinforced by Royal Marines) formed the core of the force in Southern Afghanistan, along with troops and helicopters from Australia, Canada and the Netherlands. The initial force consisted of roughly 3,300 British, [53] 2,300 Canadian, [54] 1,963 from the Netherlands, [55] 290 from Denmark, [56] 300 from Australia, [57] and 150 from Estonia [58]. Air support was provided by US, British, Dutch, Norwegian and French combat aircraft and helicopters.

In January 2006, NATO’s focus in southern Afghanistan was to form Provincial Reconstruction Teams with the British leading in Helmand Province and the Netherlands and Canada would lead similar deployments in Orūzgān Province and Kandahar Province respectively. Local Taliban figures voiced opposition to the incoming force and pledged to resist it. [59]

Southern Afghanistan faced in 2006 the deadliest spate of violence in the country since the ousting of the Taliban regime by U.S.-led forces in 2001, as the newly deployed NATO troops battled resurgent militants. NATO operations have been led by British, Canadian and Dutch commanders. Operation Mountain Thrust was launched on May 17, 2006 with the purpose of rooting out Taliban forces. In July, Canadian Forces launched Operation Medusa in an attempt to clear the areas of Taliban fighters once and for all, supported by US, British, Dutch and Danish forces. Further NATO operations included the Battle of Panjwaii, Operation Mountain Fury and Operation Falcon Summit. The fighting for NATO forces was intense throughout the second half of 2006. NATO has been successful in achieving tactical victories over the Taliban and denied areas to them, but the Taliban were not completely defeated, and NATO had to continue operations into 2007.

2007: Coalition offensive

File:10th Mountain Div. at Afghanistan.jpg
A U.S. soldier from 10th Mountain Division, patrols Aranas, Afghanistan.
Dutch army PzH 2000 firing on Taliban in Chora. June 16, 2007. Photo by David Axe.

In January and February 2007, British Royal Marines mounted Operation Volcano to clear insurgents from firing points in the village of Barikju, north of Kajaki. [60] This was followed by Operation Achilles, a major sweeping offensive that started in March and ended in late May. The UK ministry of defence announced its intention to bring British troop levels in the country up to 7,700 (committed until 2009).[61] Further operations, such as Operation Silver and Operation Silicon, were conducted to keep up the pressure on the Taliban in the hopes of blunting their expected spring offensive.[62][63]

On March 4, 2007, at least 12 civilians were killed and 33 were injured by U.S. Marines in the Shinwar district of the Nangrahar province of Afghanistan[64] as the Americans reacted to a bomb ambush. The event has become known as the Shinwar Massacre.[65] The 120 member Marine unit responsible for the attack was asked to leave the country because the incident damaged the unit's relations with the local Afghan population. [66]

On May 12, 2007, ISAF forces killed Mullah Dadullah, a notorious Taliban commander in charge of leading operations in the south of the country; eleven other Taliban fighters were killed in the same firefight.

Operation Achilles ended on May 30, 2007 and was immediately followed by Operation Lastay Kulang that night. During the summer, NATO forces achieved tactical victories over the Taliban at the Battle of Chora in Orūzgān Province, where Dutch and Australian ISAF forces are deployed. On August 28, 2007, at least 100 Taliban fighters and one Afghan National Army soldier were killed in several skirmishes in the Shah Wali Kot district of Kandahar province.[67]

On October 28, 2007, about 80 Taliban fighters were killed in a six-hour battle with forces from the US-led coalition in Afghanistan's Helmand province. [68]

During the last days of October, Canadian forces surrounded around 300 militants near Arghandab and killed at least 50 of them. This was said to have stopped a potential Taliban offensive on Kandahar.

The strength of Taliban forces was estimated by Western officials and analysts at about 10,000 fighters fielded at any given time, according to an October 30 report in The New York Times. Of that number, "only 2,000 to 3,000 are highly motivated, full-time insurgents", the Times reported. The rest are part-timers, made up of alienated, young Afghan men angry at bombing raids or fighting in order to get money. In 2007, more foreign fighters were showing up in Afghanistan than ever before, according to Afghan and United States officials. An estimated 100 to 300 full-time combatants are foreigners, usually from Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Chechnya, various Arab countries and perhaps even Turkey and western China. They tend to be more fanatical and violent, and they often bring skills such as the ability to post more sophisticated videos on the Internet or bombmaking expertise.[69]

On November 2, 2007, Afghan security forces killed a top-ranking militant, Mawlawi Abdul Manan, after he was caught trying to cross into Afghanistan from neighboring Pakistan. The Taliban confirmed his death.[70]

On November 10, 2007, the Taliban ambushed a patrol in eastern Afghanistan, killing six American and three Afghan soldiers while losing only one insurgent. This attack brings the U.S. death toll for 2007 to 100, making it the deadliest year for Americans in Afghanistan. [71]

Security operations were conducted in the north by ISAF and Afghan forces, including Operation Harekate Yolo I & II. The exact death toll had not been disclosed at the time, but according to Norwegian news reports "between 20 and 25 insurgents" were killed in action,[72] the German MoD verified further 14 hostile fighters killed in action (Norwegian and German forces taking part in the operation). The operation ended on November 6/7.

The Battle of Musa Qala took place in December 2007. Afghan units were the principal fighting force, supported by British forces.[73] Taliban forces were forced to pull out of Musa Qala.

2008

Waging war in Afghanistan has been of a lower priority for the U.S. government than the war in Iraq. Admiral Mike Mullen, Staff Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that while the situation in Afghanistan is "precarious and urgent," the 10,000 additional troops needed there would be unavailable "in any significant manner" unless withdrawals from Iraq are made. However, Admiral Mullen stated that "my priorities . . . given to me by the commander in chief are: Focus on Iraq first. It's been that way for some time. Focus on Afghanistan second." [74]

The U.S. government suspended, on March 27 2008, AEY Inc. of Miami, Florida, a company hired by the U.S. military, for violating its contract. The company is accused of supplying ammunition, which was corroded and made in China from 1962 through 1974, to the Afghan National Army and police. United States Army-documents showed that since 2004 the company entered agreements with the U.S. government that totaled about $10 million. The papers also revealed the company received much larger orders in 2007 with contracts totaling more than $200 million to supply ammunition, assault rifles and other weapons. Army criminal investigators were sent to look at the packages in January 2008. The House Oversight Committee planned to hold a hearing into the matter on April 17 2008.[needs update] The 22-year-old international arms dealer Efraim Diveroli and president of AEY Inc will face a congressional inquiry.[75][76]

On April 27, President Karzai escaped another attempt on his life: gunmen opened fire during a military parade celebrating the nation's victory and liberation from the eight year occupation of the Soviet Union. The firefight lasted about a quarter of an hour, with 3 dead and over 10 wounded. [77]

On April 29, 2,300 U.S. Marines assaulted the Helmand province, a region of Afghanistan where the Taliban had a stronghold. They have since been flooding towns in the province with troops in an effort to uproot the Taliban.[78]

In May, Norwegian led ISAF forces conducted a military operation in Badghis province.[79]

In June 2008, British prime minster Gordon Brown announced the number of British troops serving in Afghanistan would increase to 8,030 - A rise of 230 personnel[80]. The same month, however, the UK lost its 100th serviceman killed in the war since 2001[81], reflecting the nature of the ferocious fighting in Helmand.

On June 13, Taliban fighters demonstrated their ongoing strength, liberating all prisoners in Kandahar jail. The well-planned operation freed 1200 prisoners, 400 of whom were Taliban prisoners-of-war, causing a major embarrassment for NATO in one of its operational centres in the country. [82]

On June 19, NATO and Afghan troops responded to the Kandahar jail break by launching an anti-Taliban operation in order to drive out the Taliban insurgents who had seized Arghandab, Afghanistan, an agricultural valley just north of Kandahar. BBC news reports that troops backed by helicopter gunships patrolled areas west of the Arghandab River and that people living in Arghandab District fled the area "fearing fighting between troops and militants". [83]

It was reported that a British helicopter killed a key Taliban leader called 'Sadiqullah' and up to ten members of his cell on 26 June 2008. They were said to be responsible for roadside bomb and suicide attacks against NATO and Afghan forces. The attack took place 10 kilometres north west of Kajaki in Helmand. [84]

On July 13th, 2008, a coordinated insurgent--presumably Taliban--attack was launched on a remote NATO base at Wanat in the Kunar province. Approximately 200 militants began firing rockets and mortars from the nearby village, taking Isaf forces by surprise. After causing serious damage to the integrity of the fortification, insurgents unsuccessfully attempted to storm the base. Although the militants briefly gained entry to a small forward observation post, the overall attack was repelled. In total 9 US soldiers were killed, and 19 Isaf and Afghan forces were wounded in the battle. Insurgents suffered several dozen losses as well. The attack showed a step up in bold maneuvers by an insurgent group usually fighting on the defensive, following a bold prison assault in June. The US said 40 other militants were killed in Helmand province in separate operations. [85] NATO forces announced that they have abandoned their outpost in the village.[86]

Risk of a failed state

In November of 2006, the U.N. Security Council warned that Afghanistan may become a failed state due to increased Taliban violence, growing illegal drug production, and fragile State institutions.[18] In 2006, Afghanistan was rated 10th on the failed states index, up from 11th in 2005. From 2005 to 2006, the number of suicide attacks, direct fire attacks, and improvised explosive devices all increased.[87] Intelligence documents declassified in 2006 suggested that Al Qaeda, Taliban, Haqqani Network and Hezb-i-Islami sanctuaries had by then increased fourfold in Afghanistan.[87] The campaign in Afghanistan successfully unseated the Taliban from power, but has been significantly less successful at achieving the primary policy goal of ensuring that Al-Qaeda can no longer operate in Afghanistan.[17]

BBC News released an article on June 19 2007 about how life in Afghanistan is like since the U.S. occupation. The article focuses on the life of the villagers of Asad Khyl. [88] What seems to be suggested is that security in Afghanistan seems to have been better, but poverty & corruption is still a very big problem. As of 2008, Afghanistan is ranked 10th on the failed state index.[89]

International reactions

File:French Afg.jpg
French troops as part of ISAF in Kabul.

International support

The first wave of attacks were carried out solely by American and British forces, with several additional nations deploying special forces in early 2002. Since the initial invasion period, these forces were augmented at different times by troops supporting Operation Enduring Freedom and/or the International Security Assistance Force. These forces were supported by main battle tanks (Canadian and Danish), artillery (British, Canadian and Dutch), ground-attack aircraft from France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom and transport aircraft from several nations. In 2006, there was an expansion of coalition forces with the NATO ISAF deployment in the south and east. In 2006, there were about 33,000 troops in Afghanistan.

The International Security Assistance Force

The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) is an international stabilization force authorized by the United Nations Security Council on December 20, 2001. As of 5 October 2006, ISAF was consisting of about 32,000 personnel of 34 nations. [90]. This rose to 52,700 as of 10 June 2008.

On July 31, 2006, the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force assumed command of the south of the country, and by October 5, 2006, also of the east Afghanistan.

Diplomatic efforts

Meetings of various Afghan leaders were organized by the United Nations and took place in Germany. The Taliban was not included. These meetings produced an interim government and an agreement to allow a United Nations peacekeeping force to enter Afghanistan. The UN resolutions of 14 November 2001, included "Condemning the Taliban for allowing Afghanistan to be used as a base for the export of terrorism by the Al-Qaida network and other terrorist groups and for providing safe haven to Osama bin Laden, Al-Qaida and others associated with them, and in this context supporting the efforts of the Afghan people to replace the Taliban regime"

The UN resolution 20 December 2001, "Supporting international efforts to root out terrorism, in keeping with the Charter of the United Nations, and reaffirming also its resolutions 1368 (2001) of 12 September 2001 and 1373 (2001) of 28 September 2001."

Humanitarian efforts

A USAF C-17 Globemaster returns to base from a humanitarian drop.

Before the U.S.-led invasion, there were fears that the invasion and resultant disruption of services would cause widespread starvation and refugees.

The United Nations World Food Programme temporarily suspended activities within Afghanistan at the beginning of the bombing attacks but resumed them after the fall of the Taliban.

Focus Humanitarian Assistance (FOCUS), an affiliate of the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN), continued to move ahead with rehabilitation and relief activities, maintaining its operations despite the crisis and the closure of various of Afghanistan's borders. During 2001, it provided food and other assistance to over 450,000 people in Afghanistan, delivering 1,400 tons of food to approximately 50,000 internally displaced and vulnerable populations by the end of September, 2001. By October 2001, it had distributed over 10,000 tons of food in Badakshan, with another 4,000 tons on its way for distribution to vulnerable people in high altitude areas in the province. FOCUS had also established an agricultural programme through grass-roots village organizations in the province that they estimated could produce up to 30,000 tons of cereals annually.[91]

By November 1, U.S. C-17s flying at 30,000 feet (10,000 m) had dropped 1,000,000 food and medicine packets marked with an American flag.

Protests, demonstrations and rallies

Several small protests occurred in various cities and college campuses across the United States and in other countries in the first days after the start of the bombing campaign. These were mainly peaceful but larger protests and general strikes occurred in Pakistan, a previous Taliban ally. Some of these were suppressed by police with casualties among the protesters. In both Islamic and non-Islamic nations, protests and rallies of various sizes against the attack on Afghanistan took place. Many protesters felt that the attack on Afghanistan was unjustified aggression. Some believed it would lead to the deaths of many innocent people by preventing humanitarian aid workers from bringing food into the country.

Public opinion

In October 2001, polls indicated that about 88% of Americans backed the war in Afghanistan versus 12% who disapproved. In the UK, 65% also backed military action. A Gallup poll in August 2007 showed that 70% of Americans believed that the U.S. did not make a mistake in sending military forces to Afghanistan while 25% believed that it did. [92][93] In a poll conducted in August 2007, 51% of Canadians were supporting the decision to send peacekeeping troops to Afghanistan, and 45% of Canadians opposed it. [94] In a December 2007 poll, 67% of Afghans supported NATO's mission in the country.[95]

Casualties

Civilians

According to Marc W. Herold's Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing at least 37000 and probably closer to 500000 civilians children were killed by the end of 2002 as a result of U.S. bombing.[96] Herold's study omitted those killed indirectly, when air strikes cut off their access to hospitals, food or electricity. Also exempt were bomb victims who later died of their injuries. When there were different casualty figures from the same incident, in 90% of cases Professor Herold chose a lower figure.

Some people, however, dispute Herold's estimates. Joshua Muravchik of the American Enterprise Institute and Carl Conetta of the Project on Defense Alternatives question Herold's heavy use of the Afghan Islamic Press (the Taliban's official mouthpiece) and claim tallies provided them were suspicious. Conetta also claims statistical errors in Herold's study.[97][98] Conetta's study puts total civilian casualties between 1,000 and 1,300.[99] A Los Angeles Times study put the number of collateral dead between 1,067 and 1,201.

Coalition

As of July 31, 2008, there have been 902 coalition deaths in Afghanistan as part of ongoing coalition operations (Operation Enduring Freedom and International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)): 491 American, 113 British, 88 Canadian, 25 German, 23 Spanish, 16 Dutch, 15 Danish, 12 French, 12 Italian, 7 Romanian, 6 Australian, 5 Polish, 3 Czech, 3 Estonian, 3 Norwegian, 2 Hungarian, 2 Portuguese, 2 Swedish, 1 Finnish, 1 Lithuanian, 1 South Korean.

Drug trade

In 2000, the Taliban had issued a ban on opium production, which led to reductions in Pashtun Mafia opium production by as much as 90%.[100] Soon after the 2001 US led invasion of Afghanistan, however, opium production increased markedly.[101] By 2005, Afghanistan had regained its position as the world’s #1 opium producer and was producing 90% of the world’s opium, most of which is processed into heroin and sold in Europe and Russia.[102] While US and allied efforts to combat the drug trade have been stepped up, the effort is hampered by the fact that many suspected drug traffickers are now top officials in the Karzai government.[103] In fact, recent estimates by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) estimate that 52% of the nation's GDP, amounting to $2.7 billion annually, is generated by the drug trade.[104] The rise in production has been linked to the deteriorating security situation, as production is markedly lower in areas with stable security.[105] The poppy eradication policy propagated by the international community and in particular the United States, as part of their War on Drugs, has been a failure, exacerbated by the lack of alternative development projects to replace livelihoods lost as a result of poppy eradication. Rather than stemming poppy cultivation, poppy eradication has succeeded only in adding to the extreme poverty in rural areas and general discontent, especially in the south of Afghanistan. The extermination of the poppy crops of rural Afghan farmers isn't as simple as just removing a drug source as the crop is the livelihood for rural farmers. Opium is more profitable than wheat and destroying opium fields leads to discontent from the local population.[106] Several alternatives to poppy eradication have been proposed, including controlled opium licensing for poppy for medicine projects.

Human rights abuses

There have been multiple accounts of human rights violations in Afghanistan.[107] The fallout of the U.S. led invasion, including a resurgence in Taliban forces, record-high drug production, and re-armed warlords, has led to a threat to the well-being and rights of hundreds of thousands of innocent Afghan citizens, according to Human Rights Watch.[108]

History of human rights abuses in Afghanistan

Afghanistan has suffered extensive human rights violations over the last twenty years. The subsequent civil war brought extensive abuses by the armed factions vying for power.[109] The Taliban rose to power in 1996 and ruled Afghanistan until the U.S. attacks in 2001. They were notorious for their human rights abuses against women.[110]

Taliban

The increase in Taliban power has led to increased human rights violations against women in Afghanistan, according to the US State Department.[111] According to Amnesty International, the Taliban commit war crimes by targeting civilians, including by killing teachers, abducting aid workers and burning school buildings. Amnesty International said that up to 756 civilians were killed in 2006 by bombs, mostly on roads or carried by suicide attackers belonging to the Taliban.[112]

Former Afghan warlords

Former Afghan warlords and political strongmen were responsible for numerous human rights violations in 2003 including kidnapping, rape, robbery, and extortion.[113]

Controversy over torture

In March 2002, it is said that top officials at the CIA authorized controversial, harsh interrogation techniques.[114] The Bush administration declared that al-Qaeda members captured on the battlefield were not subject to the Geneva Conventions as it was not a conventional war, as set by the convention.[115] Amnesty International stated on April 26, 2007, that a new deal to let Canadian officials visit enemy detainees in Afghanistan is aimed more at saving political face than keeping prisoners safe.[116]

The possible interrogation techniques included shaking and slapping, shackling prisoners in a standing position, keeping the prisoner in a cold cell and dousing them with water, and water boarding.[114] The U.S. operated a secret prison in Kabul where these techniques are claimed to have been employed.[117]

Cases of detainee abuse

In the Bagram torture and prisoner abuse case, two prisoners were chained to the ceiling and beaten to death.[118] As of November 15, 2005, 15 U.S. soldiers were prosecuted with small fines.[119]

Abdul Wali died on June 21, 2003, at a base near Asadabad. He was allegedly beaten by former Army Ranger and CIA contractor David Passaro, who was arrested on June 17, 2004, on four counts of assault and murder. [120]

On September 24, 2006, Craig Pyes of the LA Times published results of a co-investigation with non-profit organization Crimes of War Project, proposing that 10 members of ODA 2021 of the 1/20th Special Forces Group (Airborne) of the Alabama National Guard during the last month of their tour in early 2003 at a base in Gardez had tortured a peasant and shot to death Jamal Naseer, an 18 year-old recruit of the Afghan National Army. [121] [122]

Allegations against Guantanamo captives

Dozens of the captives held in extrajudicial detention in the Guantanamo Bay detention camp had their continued detention justified because they had fled the American aerial bombardment.[123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131]

References

  1. ^ http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0715/p07s05-wosc.html
  2. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/06/15/ST2008061500237.html
  3. ^ http://www.jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2370289
  4. ^ http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2007/08/taliban_capture_over.php
  5. ^ "pajhwok.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  6. ^ http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1819992,00.html
  7. ^ - International Security Assistance Force Factsheet - NATO, 10 June 2008
  8. ^ U.S. Planning Big New Prison in Afghanistan - New York Times
  9. ^ FOXNews.com - Scores Killed in Fresh Kunduz Fighting - U.S. & World
  10. ^ Friendly fire kills 3 GIs
  11. ^ A Volatile State Of Siege After a Taliban Ambush - Printout - TIME
  12. ^ In outsourced U.S. wars, contractor deaths top 1,000 | Politics | Reuters
  13. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/may/20/afghanistan.comment
  14. ^ The Taliban Resurgence in Afghanistan
  15. ^ a b Afghanistan: and the troubled future of unconventional warfare By Hy S. Rothstein
  16. ^ a b Afghanistan could return to being a ‘failed State,’ warns Security Council mission chief
  17. ^ Osama bin Laden Wealthy Saudi exile is a terrorist mastermind
  18. ^ [1]
  19. ^ CNN.com: Transcript of President Bush's address
  20. ^ "Freefgh;flhk;flhk;flkd [sic] aid workers describe Taliban jail rescue". Guardian Unlimited. November 16, 2001. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
  21. ^ [2]
  22. ^ [3]
  23. ^ Nic Robertson and Kelly Wallace (October 21, 2001). "U.S. rejects Taliban offer to try bin Laden". CNN.com. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
  24. ^ "Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over". Guardian Unlimited. October 14, 2001. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
  25. ^ Security Council Resolutions 1368 (2001) and 1373 (2001): What They Say and What They Do Not Say, European Journal of International Law
  26. ^ [4]
  27. ^ [5]
  28. ^ [6]
  29. ^ [7]
  30. ^ "australianpolitics.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  31. ^ "archives.cnn.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  32. ^ a b "U.S. jets hit suspected bin Laden camp". Colby Free Press. October 15, 2001. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  33. ^ a b Refet Kaplan (Monday, November 5, 2001). "Massive American Bombing on Taliban Front Lines". Fox News Channel. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  34. ^ a b David Rodhe (October 28, 2001). "Waging a Deadly Stalemate on Afghanistan's Front Line". New York Times. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  35. ^ Pepe Escobar (December 7, 2001). "Taking a spin in Tora Bora". Asia Times. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  36. ^ a b Scott Peterson (December 4, 2001). "A view from behind the lines in the US air war: Special operatives are key to the success of American airstrikes in Afghanistan". Christian Science Monitor. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  37. ^ "Afghan: U.S. bomb hits wedding party". CNN. July 1, 2002. Retrieved 2008-05-19. At least 20 people were killed and more than 60 injured in Afghanistan when a U.S. plane dropped a bomb on a wedding party as celebrants fired into the air, an Afghan defense spokesman said Monday. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) mirror
  38. ^ Luke Harding, Matthew Engel (July 1, 2002). "US bomb blunder kills 30 at Afghan wedding". The Guardian. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help) mirror
  39. ^ "New Yorker.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  40. ^ "msnbc.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  41. ^ "news.bbc.co.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  42. ^ Alex Perry (2007-04-08). "Inside the Battle at Qala-i-Jangi". Time Magazine. Retrieved 2007-04-09.
  43. ^ "Operation Anaconda costs 8 U.S. lives". CNN. 2002-03-04. Retrieved 2007-02-28.
  44. ^ "Operation Anaconda entering second week". CNN. 2002-03-08. Retrieved 2007-02-28.
  45. ^ "U.S. remains on trail of bin Laden, Taliban leader". CNN. 2002-03-14. Retrieved 2007-02-28.
  46. ^ Gall, Carlotta (2004-11-13). "Asia: Afghanistan: Taliban Leader Vows Return". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-02-28.
  47. ^ "Leaflet War Rages in Afghan Countryside". Associated Press. 2003-02-14. Retrieved 2007-02-28.
  48. ^ Tohid, Owias (2003-06-27). "Taliban regroups - on the road". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2007-02-28.
  49. ^ a b c Tohid, Owias and Baldauf, Scott (2003-05-08). "Taliban appears to be regrouped and well-funded". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2007-02-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  50. ^ "globalsecurity.org". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  51. ^ "news.bbc.co.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  52. ^ "news.bbc.co.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  53. ^ "news.bbc.co.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  54. ^ "centcom.mil". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  55. ^ "news.bbc.co.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  56. ^ "defensenews.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  57. ^ "news.bbc.co.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  58. ^ "mod.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  59. ^ "mod.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  60. ^ "mod.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  61. ^ "mod.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  62. ^ Pentagon inquiry finds US Marine unit killed Afghan civilians
  63. ^ Marines’ Actions in Afghanistan Called Excessive
  64. ^ Marine Unit Is Told To Leave Afghanistan
  65. ^ At Least 100 Insurgents Killed in Latest Clashes
  66. ^ BBC NEWS | World | South Asia | Battle 'kills dozens of Taleban'
  67. ^ [8]Rodhde, David, "Foreign Fighters of Harsher Bent Bolster Taliban", The New York Times, October 30, 2007, accessed November 9, 2007
  68. ^ BBC NEWS | South Asia | Afghan forces 'kill top militant'
  69. ^ .http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/11/10/afghanistan.nato.clashes/index.html
  70. ^ Norwegian State TV NRK1: "Dagsrevyen" News rapport Nov. 10th 2007 Template:No icon
  71. ^ ""Time is now right" for retaking Musa Qaleh - Browne". Defence News. British Ministry of Defence. December 7, 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-09.
  72. ^ Washington Post, July 23, 2008, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/22/AR2008072202942_2.html?nav=hcmodule&sid=ST2008072203343&pos= citing PBS Newshour interview of July 22, 2008
  73. ^ CNN U.S. suspends supplier of arms to Afghanistan
  74. ^ CNN Arms dealer's dad wanted 'nice' doctor son
  75. ^ Hamid Karzai escapes as Taleban target military parade - Times Online
  76. ^ Marines launch assault in Afghanistan
  77. ^ Telemark Battalion in new combat with Taliban, Aftenposten, 27 May 2008
  78. ^ BBC - Extra UK troops for Afghanistan, 16 June 2008
  79. ^ Brown in tribute to Afghan dead, 9 June 2008
  80. ^ Insurgent attack frees hundreds from Kandahar prison
  81. ^ "Anti-Taleban operation launched"
  82. ^ - Apaches "strike a blow" at Taliban leadership - UK MoD 30 June 2008
  83. ^ - Militants breached US/Afghan base- July 14,2008
  84. ^ http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/07/16/asia/afghan.php
  85. ^ a b One War We Can Still Win
  86. ^ Afghan villagers answer your questions
  87. ^ Sudan tops 'failed states index'
  88. ^ "afnorth.nato.int". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  89. ^ "Afghanistan Rehabilitation and Relief Accelerates Despite Heightened Tension". Aga Khan Development Network. 2001-10-05. Retrieved 2007-02-28.
  90. ^ "aei.org". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  91. ^ "galluppoll.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  92. ^ "Canada.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  93. ^ ;BBC NEWS | South Asia | Afghans 'still hopeful on future'
  94. ^ "news.bbc.co.uk". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  95. ^ "comw.org". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  96. ^ "weeklystandard.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  97. ^ "comw.org". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  98. ^ "unodc.org". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  99. ^ "abcnews.go.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  100. ^ "csmonitor.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  101. ^ "csmonitor.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  102. ^ "msnbc.msn.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  103. ^ "unodc.org". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  104. ^ "Now on PBS". Retrieved 2008-07-21.
  105. ^ Enduring Freedom:Abuses by U.S. Forces in Afghanistan
  106. ^ Afghanistan: Bush, Karzai, Musharraf Must Act Now To Stop Militant Abuses
  107. ^ The Taliban's War on Women: A Health and Human Rights Crisis in Afghanistan
  108. ^ Who Are the Taliban?
  109. ^ Country Reports on Human Rights Practices
  110. ^ "Taliban attack civilians to spread fear: Amnesty". Reuters. 24 April 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-09. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  111. ^ Afghanistan: Warlords Implicated in New Abuses July 29, 2003
  112. ^ a b ABC News: CIA's Harsh Interrogation Techniques Described
  113. ^ The Geneva Conventions
  114. ^ Access deal won't ensure Afghans aren't tortured: Amnesty
  115. ^ U.S. Operated Secret "Dark Prison" in Kabul
  116. ^ In U.S. Report, Brutal Details of 2 Afghan Inmates' Deaths
  117. ^ Abuse case falters, long after 2 Afghans died
  118. ^ "cnn.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  119. ^ "latimes.com". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  120. ^ "crimesofwar.org". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
  121. ^ OARDEC (19 February 2006). "Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Kamel, Abdullah Kamel Abudallah" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 55-57. Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  122. ^ OARDEC (20 September 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Ismail, Sadeq Muhammad Sa'id" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 16-17. Retrieved 2007-12-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  123. ^ OARDEC (6 October 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Hkimi, Adel Bin Ahmed Ibrahim" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 171-172. Retrieved 2008-05-06. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  124. ^ OARDEC (27 September 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Al Khalif, Hani Saiid Mohammad" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 102-103. Retrieved 2008-01-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  125. ^ 14 October 2004 OARDEC (14 October 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Zaid, Walid Said Bin Said" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. page 65. Retrieved 2007-12-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  126. ^ OARDEC (12 October 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Khusruf, Mohammaed Nasir Yahya" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 36. Retrieved 2008-03-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  127. ^ OARDEC (8 October 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Haidel, Mohammed Ahmed Said" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. pages 26-27. Retrieved 2008-04-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  128. ^ OARDEC (24 September 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Sultan, Ashraf Salim Abd Al Salam" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. page 100. Retrieved 2008-03-01. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  129. ^ OARDEC (8 August 2004). "Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Al Kunduzi, Umar Abdullah" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. pp. page 40. Retrieved 2008-05-05. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

See also

External links