Jump to content

Nuclear energy policy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Europe: Czech Republic
Line 139: Line 139:
{{mainarticle|Nuclear power in Bulgaria}}
{{mainarticle|Nuclear power in Bulgaria}}
Bulgaria operated 6 reactors, but four of them were deactivated in 2002 as a condition of joining the [[European Union]]. They are being replaced with 2 reactors of a more modern and powerful design.{{Fact|date=July 2007}}
Bulgaria operated 6 reactors, but four of them were deactivated in 2002 as a condition of joining the [[European Union]]. They are being replaced with 2 reactors of a more modern and powerful design.{{Fact|date=July 2007}}

====Czech Republic====
The [[Czech Republic|Czech]] Energy Policy of 2004 envisages building two or more large reactors to replace [[Dukovany Nuclear Power Station|Dukovany power plant]] after 2020. The plans announced in 2006 envisage construction of one 1500 MWe unit at [[Temelín Nuclear Power Station|Temelín]] after 2020, and a second to follow.<ref name="czech">{{cite web| url = http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf90.html | title = Nuclear Power in Czech Republic | date=February 2007 | publisher = World Nuclear Association | accessdate=2007-07-15}}</ref>


====Denmark====
====Denmark====

Revision as of 21:17, 15 July 2007

Main article: Nuclear power

Nuclear energy policy is a national and international policy concerning some or all aspects of nuclear energy, such as mining for nuclear fuel, extraction and processing of nuclear fuel from the ore, generating electricity by nuclear power, enriching and storing spent nuclear fuel and nuclear fuel reprocessing.

Nuclear energy policies often include the regulation of energy use and standards relating to the nuclear fuel cycle. Other measures include efficiency standards, safety regulations, emission standards, fiscal policies, and legislation on energy trading, transport of nuclear waste and contaminated materials, and their storage. Governments might subsidize nuclear energy and arrange international treaties and trade agreements about the import and export of nuclear technology, electricity, nuclear waste, and uranium.

Since nuclear energy and nuclear weapons technologies are closely related, military aspirations can act as a factor in energy policy decisions. The fear of nuclear proliferation influences some international nuclear energy policies.

The global picture

The status of nuclear power globally. Nations in dark green have reactors and are constructing new reactors, those in light green are constructing their first reactor, those in dark yellow are considering new reactors, those in light yellow are considering their first reactor, those in blue have reactors but are not constructing or decommissioning, those in light blue are considering decommissioning and those in red have decommissioned all their commercial reactors.

Installed nuclear capacity rose relatively quickly since the 1950s, but since the late 1980s capacity has risen much more slowly, reaching 366 GW in 2005, primarily due to Chinese expansion of nuclear power. Between around 1970 and 1990, more than 50 GW of capacity was under construction (peaking at over 150 GW in the late 70s and early 80s).

The growth slowed in the 1980s because of environmentalist opposition, high interest rates, and energy conservation prompted by the oil shock in 1973, the energy crisis in 1979 and the Three Mile Island accident and Chernobyl disaster. In 1983 an unexpected fall in fossil fuel prices stopped most new construction of nuclear power plants. Electricity liberalization in the United States and Europe during the 1980s and 1990s increased the financial risk of investing in nuclear power. More than two-thirds of all nuclear plants ordered after January 1970 were eventually cancelled.[1]

Nuclear power plants, however, do not directly generate any greenhouse gases, some governments have therefore returned to nuclear power as part of their strategies on tackling global warming and climate change.

In 1999 the countries that relied most on nuclear energy were France (with 75 % of its electricity generated by nuclear power stations), Lithuania (73 %), Belgium (58 %), Bulgaria, Slovakia and Sweden (47 %), Ukraine (44 %) and South Korea (43 %). The largest producer of nuclear capacity was the USA with 28 % of worldwide capacity, followed by France (18 %) and Japan (12 %).[2] In 2000, there were 438 commercial nuclear generating units throughout the world, with a total capacity of about 351 gigawatts.

According to IAEA, nuclear power is projected to increase to 17% share of the world's electricity production by 2020. They predict 60 new plants will be installed over the next 15 years.[3]

Policy options

See also: Energy policy and Nuclear power controversy

Nuclear power phase-out

File:Lula nuclear.jpg
Brasilia, Brazil , March, 15, 2005 — Greenpeace balloon in Brasilia and Lula Nuclear. Greenpeace protesting against Brazilian Nuclear Program. Photo:J. Freitas/Abr.

A nuclear power phase-out is the discontinuation of usage of nuclear power for energy production. Often initiated because of concerns about nuclear power, phase-outs usually include shutting down nuclear power plants and looking towards other fuels or alternative energy. In 1980s, a popular movement against nuclear power gained strength in the Western world, based on the fear of a possible nuclear accident and on fears of latent radiation. The 1979 accident at Three Mile Island and the 1986 Chernobyl accident played a key role in stopping new plant construction and starting nuclear power phase out in several countries.

Nuclear energy renascence

After a period of decline in the use of nuclear technology following the accidents in the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, there has more lately been renewed interest in nuclear energy. Some policymakers have returned to the 'nuclear option' because they see it as potentially able to address dwindling global oil reserves and global warming with less greenhouse gas emissions than fossil fuel. The parliamentary decision in 2002 in Finland to grant a license for the construction of a fifth nuclear power station was seen as very significant in that it was the first such decision to build a new nuclear power plant in Western Europe for more than a decade.[4] After Finnish decision several other countries announced their intention to consider construction of new nuclear reactors.

Energy security

For some countries, nuclear power affords energy independence. In the case of nuclear power phase-out the alternatives for energy generation are needed if they don't want to become dependent on imports. In the words of the French, "We have no coal, we have no oil, we have no gas, we have no choice."[citation needed] Therefore, the discussion of a future for nuclear energy is intertwined with a discussion of energy security and use of energy mix, including renewable energy development. The most discussed alternatives to nuclear power include hydroelectricity, fossil energy, solar energy, and biomass.[citation needed] A comprehensive public opinion survey, performed in May and June 2006 in the European Union member countries, concluded that EU citizens perceive great future promise in the use of renewable energies, but despite majority opposition, nuclear energy also has its place in the future energy mix.[5]

Nuclear power has been relatively unaffected by embargoes, and uranium is mined in reliable countries, including Australia and Canada.[6][7] Nuclear power also has a high energy return on energy investment. Using life cycle analysis, it takes 4 to 5 months of energy production from the nuclear plant to fully pay back the initial energy investment.[8]

Nuclear policy arguments

Main article: Nuclear power § Concerns about nuclear power

Policymakers must balance their decisions so that the concerns surrounding nuclear power are addressed. These include the problem of storing radioactive waste for indefinite periods, the potential for severe radioactive contamination by accident or sabotage, and the possibility that its use could in some countries lead to the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Proponents, including some national governments, claim that these risks are small and can be lessened with new technology. They note that France and all of the industrialised economies of Asia see nuclear power as a key economic strategy, that the safety record is already good when compared to other energy forms, that it releases much less pollution than coal power, and that nuclear power is a sustainable energy or even renewable energy source.

Opponents, including some national governments and many environmental groups, claim nuclear power is an uneconomic, unsound and potentially dangerous energy source and dispute whether the costs and risks can be reduced through new technology. They note that Germany and Australia are commercializing renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies (see Renewable energy in Germany and Renewable energy commercialization in Australia).

Policies by country

Main article: Nuclear power by country
See also: List of nuclear reactors
A nuclear power plant at Grafenrheinfeld, Germany. All German nuclear plants are scheduled to be shut down by 2020.

Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, Finland, India, Iran, Lithuania, North Korea, Romania, Russia, Pakistan, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Ukraine, and the U.S. are currently planning or building new nuclear reactors or reopening old ones. Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Indonesia, Israel, Slovakia, South Africa, Turkey, and Vietnam are considering doing this. Armenia, Belgium, Germany, Hungary, Mexico, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and United Kingdom have nuclear reactors but currently no advanced proposals for expansion.[9][10][11] Australia, Austria, Denmark, Greece, Ireland and Norway have no nuclear plants and have restricted new plant constructions. Poland stopped the construction of a plant. Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Spain and Sweden decided not to build new plants or intend to phase out nuclear power, although still mostly relying on nuclear energy.

Africa

South Africa is the only country in Africa with nuclear power plants and it currently has an expansion policy based upon the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR), with plans to export to China.[citation needed] Several groups, including Earthlife Africa and Koeberg Alert, oppose these measures.[citation needed]

Asia

Bangladesh

Bangladesh considered building a nuclear power plant first time in 1961. Since then several feasibility studies have carried out affirming the feasibility of project. In 1963 the Rooppur site was selected. More recently, in 2001 Bangladesh adopted a national Nuclear Power Action Plan.[12] On 24 June 2007, Bangladesh's government announced it will build a nuclear power plant to meet electricity shortages.[13]

China

China has 10 reactors operating, 5 reactors under construction, and is planning or proposing an additional 25.[10][14]

Gulf states

Six member states of the Gulf Cooperation Council (Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman) have announced that the Council is commissioning a study on the peaceful use of nuclear energy. In February 2007 they agreed with the IAEA to cooperate on a feasibility study for a regional nuclear power and desalination program, which according to Saudi Arabia may emerge about 2009.[12]

India

India has 16 reactors operating, 8 reactors under construction, and is planning an additional 24.[10][15]

Indonesia

Main article: Nuclear program of Indonesia

In the mid 1990s, Indonesia conducted a feasibility study into constructing 12 nuclear power plants. The plan was postponed due to criticism from environmentalists and the Asian regional economic crisis in 1997.[16][17] In 2006, Indonesian Government announced a plan to build its first major nuclear power plant on MMuria peninsula, Jepara district, Central Java by 2015. However, this decision is not final yet.[18][19] This plan is heavily criticized by environmental organisations.[20]

In June 2007 was announced that in Gorontalo will be set up 70 MW floating nuclear power plant of Russian origin.[21]

Iran

Main article: Nuclear program of Iran

In the mid 1970s, Iran started construction of two PWR units at [Bushehr], but the project was suspended in 1979. In 1994, Russia agreed to complete unit 1 of Bushehr nuclear power plant and it is expected to be completed late in 2007. Also second reactor is planned at Bushehr. It also announced that a new nuclear power plant is to be built at Darkhovin in Khūzestān Province, where two plants were about to be constructed in 1970s.[12]

Israel

In January 2007, Israeli Infrastructure Minister Binyamin Ben Eliezer said his country should consider producing nuclear power for civilian purposes.[22]

Japan

Main article: Nuclear power in Japan

Japan has 55 reactors operating and 3 reactors under construction.[14]

Jordan

According to the country's energy minister, Jordan intends to build its first nuclear power plant by 2015. It will be used for electricity generation and and desalination.[23] The possible purchase of Candu heavy-water reactors has been discussed with Canada.[24]

Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan shut down its only NPP in 1999. In 2003, the Minister of Energy and Mines announced plans for the construction of a new NPP within the next 15 years. The two–three unit NPP is to be established on the shores of Lake Balkhash in the Karaganda region of central Kazakhstan.[2]

North Korea

North Korea had two PWRs at Kumho under construction until construction was suspended in November 2003. On September 19, 2005 North Korea pledged to stop building nuclear weapons and agreed to international inspections in return for energy aid. The agreement hinted that this aid might in future include one or more light water reactors.[citation needed]

South Korea

South Korea has 18 operational nuclear power reactors, with two more under construction and scheduled to go online by 2004.[citation needed]

Malaysia

Although Malaysia has established Nuclear Agency and been actively involved in the periodic review of the nuclear option, currently there is no nuclear power generation plant neither is there a plan to embark on a nuclear power programme in the foreseeable future.[25]

Pakistan

Main article: Nuclear power in Pakistan

Pakistan operates two reactors, is building a third, and is considering two more.[citation needed]

The Philippines

In the Philippines, in 2004, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo outlined her energy policy. It included plans to convert the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant, one of their two reactors, into a gas powered facility.[citation needed]

Syria

Syria abandoned its plans to build a VVER-440 reactor after the Chernobyl accident.[12] The plans of nuclear program were revived at the beginning of 2000s when Syria negotiated with Russia to build a nuclear facility that would include a nuclear power plant and a seawater atomic desalination plant.[26]

Taiwan

Taiwan has three operational reactors, but support for nuclear energy is strongly split between the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party. As long as the DPP is in power, no new reactors will be built.[citation needed]

Thailand

According to the energy minister of Thailand, the state owned Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand will build first two nuclear power plants by 2021. This decision was criticized by Greenpeace, which suggested to focus on alternative power supplies from hydropower and smaller biofuel plants before risking nuclear.[27][28]

Turkey

In July 2000, the Turkish government decided not to build the controversial nuclear plant in Akkuyu.[citation needed] In August 2006, the government said it planned to have three nuclear power plants total 4500 MWe operating by 2012-2015. The first units would probably be built at Akkuyu, since the site is already licensed. In May 2007, a law concerning construction and operation of nuclear power plants and sale of their electricity was passed by parliament. It also addresses waste management and decommissioning, providing for a National Radioactive Waste Account and a Decommissioning Account, which generators will pay into progressively.[12]

Vietnam

In the 1980s Vietnam undertook two preliminary nuclear power studies, which stated need to introduce nuclear energy for satisfying the growth in the electricity demand. A national energy plan includes the nuclear power capacity to be commenced by 2010. In February 2006, the government announced the first nuclear power plant would be commissioned by 2017.[12]

Oceania

Australia

Wikinews has related news:

Australia has up to 40% of the world's uranium deposits and is the world's second largest producer of uranium after Canada.[2] At the same time Australia's extensive, low-cost coal and natural gas reserves have historically been used as strong arguments for avoiding nuclear power. But more recently a number of prominent politicians have begun to advocate for its serious consideration as a means to affordably reduce greenhouse emissions and allow for large-scale de-salination plants.[citation needed]

In 2005, the Australian government threatened to use its constitutional powers to take control of the approval process for new mines from the anti-nuclear Northern Territory government. They are also negotiating with China to weaken safeguard terms so as to allow uranium exports there.[citation needed] States controlled by the Australian Labor Party are blocking the development of new mines in their jurisdictions under the ALP's "No New Mines policy." The Uranium Mining, Processing and Nuclear Energy Review (UMPNER), an inquiry run by the department of the Prime Minister in Cabinet, is expected to pave the way for nuclear power in Australia, providing the government is returned to power after the election later this year.[29]

New Zealand

New Zealand enacted the New Zealand Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act of 1987 which prohibits the stationing of nuclear weapons on the territory of New Zealand and the entry into New Zealand waters of nuclear armed or propelled ships. This Act of Parliament, however, does not prevent the construction of nuclear power plants.[citation needed]

Europe

Austria

A nuclear power station was built during the 1970s at Zwentendorf, Austria, but its start-up was prevented by a popular vote in 1978. On July 9, 1997, the Austrian Parliament voted unanimously to maintain the country's anti-nuclear policy.[30]

Belarus

In mid 2006, the Government of Belarus approved a plan for the construction of an initial 2000 MWe PWR nuclear power plant in the Mahilyow Voblast. In February 2007 it was announced that construction would start in 2008, for commissioning in 2014-2015 (later: 2015-2020).[12]

Belgium

In 2003 Belgium's Government, then a coalition which included the Green party Groen!, passed legislation which stipulated that no new reactors would be built and that Belgium's seven reactors would close between 2015-2025.[31][32] When the law was being passed, there was speculation it would be overturned again as soon as an administration without Groen! was in power.[33] A report published in 2005 by the National Planning Bureau noted that in many parts of Belgium nuclear power makes up more than 50% of the electricity generated. It would therefore be difficult for Belgium to adhere to the emissions targets of the Kyoto Protocols without nuclear power.[34]

Bulgaria

Main article: Nuclear power in Bulgaria

Bulgaria operated 6 reactors, but four of them were deactivated in 2002 as a condition of joining the European Union. They are being replaced with 2 reactors of a more modern and powerful design.[citation needed]

Czech Republic

The Czech Energy Policy of 2004 envisages building two or more large reactors to replace Dukovany power plant after 2020. The plans announced in 2006 envisage construction of one 1500 MWe unit at Temelín after 2020, and a second to follow.[35]

Denmark

In Denmark, the Parliament determined in 1985 that nuclear power was not to be generated and that the sites that had been reserved for the construction of nuclear power plants were to be released. It was agreed that Danish energy planning should be based on the assumption that no new nuclear power plants would be built.[36] At the same time, about 9% of total consumed electricity is a imported nuclear energy.[37] Three research reactors at Risø National Laboratory are in the process of being decommissioned.[36]

Finland

Main article: Nuclear power in Finland

Finland's program has four nuclear reactors, which provides 27% of the country's electricity. Two VVER-440 pressurized water reactors built by Soviet Atomenergoeksport and commissioned in 1977 and 1980, locate in Loviisa. They are operated by Fortum Oyj. Two boiling water reactors built by Swedish Asea-Atom (nowadays Westinghouse Electric Company) and commissioned n 1978 and 1980, locate in Olkiluoto plant in Eurajoki, near Rauma. They are owned and operated by Teollisuuden Voima, a subsidiary of Pohjolan Voima Oy. In 2002, the cabinet's decision to allow the construction of fifth reactor (third in Olkiluoto) was accepted in the parliament. Economic, energy security and environmental grounds were given as reasons for the decision.[citation needed] The reactor will be the new European Pressurized Reactor, built by French company Areva, which is scheduled to go on line in 2011. Energy companies have proposed also construction of sixth and seventh reactors, although no decision made yet.[4][38][39]

France

Main article: Nuclear power in France

After the oil crisis of the early 1970s, the French government decided in 1974 to move towards self-sufficiency in electricity production, primarily through the construction of nuclear power stations. France today produces around 75% of its electricity through nuclear power.[40] Because France produces an overall electricity surplus, it exports nuclear-produced energy. Some of this goes to countries which are ostensibly against the use of nuclear energy, such as Germany.[citation needed] The Board of Electricité de France (EDF) has approved construction of a 1630 MWe EPR at Flamanville, Normandy. Construction is expected to begin in late 2007, with completion in 2012.[41]

Germany

Main article: Nuclear power in Germany

In 2000, the German government, consisting of a coalition including the Green party Alliance -90 officially announced its intention to phase out nuclear power in Germany. Jürgen Trittin, the Minister of Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, reached an agreement with energy companies on the gradual shut down of the country's nineteen nuclear power plants and a cessation of civil usage of nuclear power by 2020. Legislation was enacted in the Nuclear Exit Law. The power plants in Stade and Obrigheim were turned off on November 14, 2003, and May 11, 2005, respectively. Dismantling of the plants is scheduled to begin in 2007.[42] But the Nuclear Exit Law did not ban enrichment stations - one in Gronau has received permission to extend operations. There have been concerns over the safety of the phase-out, particularly in terms of the transport of nuclear waste.[43] In 2005 Angela Merkel won the German federal election with the CDU party. She has subsequently announced to re-negotiate with energy companies the time limit for a shut down of nuclear power stations. But as part of her pact with the SDP, with whom the CDU form a coalition, the phase-out policy has for now been retained.[44][45]

Greece

Although Greece has established Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), a decision has been made not to implement a nuclear power programme to generate nuclear electricity. There is one operational nuclear research reactor and one sub-critical assembly.[46]

Ireland

In Ireland, a nuclear power plant was first proposed in 1968. It was to be built during the 1970s at Carnsore Point in County Wexford. The plan envisioned four plants to be built at the site, but was dropped in 1981 after strong opposition from environmental groups and because of flattening energy demand, and Ireland has remained without nuclear power since.[citation needed] Despite opposing nuclear power and nuclear fuel reprocessing at Sellafield, Ireland is due to open an interconnector to the mainland UK to buy electricity, which is, in some part, the product of nuclear power.

In April 2006, a government-commissioned report by Forfas pointed to the need to reconsider nuclear power in order "to secure its long-run energy security". Relatively small-scale nuclear plants were envisaged. In 2007, Ireland's Electricity Supply Board made it known that it would consider a joint venture with a major EU energy company to build nuclear capacity.[12]

Italy

Italy held a referendum the year after the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, deciding to shut down Italy's four nuclear power plants. The last was closed in 1990.[47] A moratorium on the construction of new plants, originally in effect from 1987 until 1993, has since been extended indefinitely.[48]

Premier Minister Silvio Berlusconi reopened the nuclear power debate in 2005, noting Italy imports around 85% of its total energy.[49] As of today, Italy's electricity prices are 45% above EU average and Italy is is the world's largest net importer of electricity.[12]

In October 2005, the Environment Minister Altero Matteoli announced interest in switching the country's main source of energy to nuclear power within 10-15 years.[citation needed] As of 2006, Italy was an importer of nuclear-generated electricity, and its largest electricity utility Enel SPA was investing both in reactors in France and Slovakia to provide this electricity in the future, and also in the development of the EPR technology.[12]

Lithuania

In 2006, Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian power companies carried out the feasibility study for construction of the new nuclear power plant in Lithuania to replace existing Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, scheduled to be shut down in 2009. The study shows that the nuclear power plant project is feasible.[50]

The Netherlands

In 1994, the Netherland's parliament voted to phase out nuclear power after a discussion of nuclear waste management. In 1997 the power station at Dodewaard was shut down and the government decided it was planning to end Borssele's operating license in 2003. But in 2003, with a new government in power, the shut down was postponed to 2013.[51] In 2006 the government decided that Borssele will remain open until 2033, if it can comply with the highest safety standards. The owners, Essent and Delta will invest 500 million euro in sustainable energy, together with the government - money which the government claims otherwise should have been paid to the plants owners as compensation.[citation needed]

Norway

No nuclear power plant has ever been established in Norway, however it has legal framework for licensing the construction and operation of nuclear installations.[52] Currently there are discussions about usage of nuclear energy, which is supported by the most of industry leaders.[53] Statkraft together with Vattenfall, Fortum and energy investment company Scatec would like to build a thorium-fueled power plant, which is safer than uranium-fueled plant.[54]

Poland

In the 1980s, Poland had four Russian reactors under construction, but the project was canceled in 1990.[12] There is an intention for construction of new nuclear power plant, which was approved in the energy strategy document for the years 2005- 2025. According to this document, the nuclear power plant would in operation by 2021 or 2022.[55] Polish company PSE participates also in the nuclear project of Lithuania.[12]

Portugal

In 1971, Portugal planned to build a 8,000-MW nuclear power plant completed by 2000. Plans were delayed until it was finally decided in 1995 not to build any NPP in Portugal.[56] In 2004, the Government of Portugal rejected a proposal to reconsider its decision.[12] In 2005, a consortium of energy companies called Energia Nuclear de Portugal (Enupor) announced considering the construction of Portugal’s first nuclear power plant.[57]

Russia

Main article: Nuclear power in Russia

Russia operates 31 reactors, is building 3, and has plans for another 27.[citation needed]

Slovenia

The Slovenian nuclear plant in Krško (co-owned with Croatia) is scheduled to be closed by 2023, and there are no plans to build further nuclear plants. But the debate on whether and when to close the Krško plant intensified after the 2005/06 winter energy crisis. In May 2006 a Slovenian newspaper claimed the government had held internal discussions on adding a new 1000MW block into Krško after 2020.[citation needed]

Spain

In Spain a moratorium was enacted by the socialist government in 1983.[58][59] The government has announced the country will phase out nuclear power in favour of renewables.[60] The president of Portugal confirmed that nuclear energy will be phased out.[61]

Sweden

Main article: Nuclear power in Sweden

Following the Three Mile Island accident in the United States in 1979, the Swedish Government decided, after a referendum, that no further nuclear power plants should be built and that a nuclear power phase-out should be completed by 2010. But in 1998, when electricity from hydropower accounted for 48% of the country's production of electricity, the government decided to build no further hydropower plants in order to protect its national water resources. This is likely to set back the planned phase-out of Sweden's nuclear reactors, perhaps until 2045.[citation needed] Indeed the current Swedish government is proposing to end the nuclear phase-out, while still maintaining a moratorium on new construction at least until 2010.[citation needed]

Switzerland

Main article: Nuclear power in Switzerland

There have been several referenda on nuclear energy in Switzerland. In 1990, the people passed a motion to halt the construction of nuclear power plants (for a moratorium period of ten years) but rejected a motion to initiate a phase-out.[citation needed] In 2003 a motion calling for an extension to this moratorium (for another ten years) and another asking again on the question of a phase-out, were both rejected.[citation needed] Around 40% of Switzerland's electricity is generated by nuclear power.[citation needed]

The United Kingdom

Main article: Nuclear power in the United Kingdom

The future of nuclear power in the United Kingdom is currently under review. The country has a number of reactors which are currently reaching the end of their working life, and it is currently undecided how they will be replaced. The UK is also failing to reach its targets for reduction on CO2 emissions, a situation which may be worsened if new nuclear power stations are not built.[citation needed] The UK also uses a large proportion of gas fired power stations, which produce relatively low (compared to coal) CO2 emissions, but there have been recent difficulties in obtaining adequate gas supplies. The UK government has just appointed a new pro-nuclear energy minister.[citation needed]

North America

Canada

Main article: Nuclear power in Canada

Canada operates 18 reactors accounting for about 15% of electrical generation, mostly in the province of Ontario. Increasing demands for electricity and Kyoto Agreement obligations have lead Ontario to announce that it will maintain existing nuclear capacity by replacing older reactors with new ones.[62]

Mexico

Mexico has one nuclear power plant, which consists of two boiling water reactors.[63] In February 2007, contracts with Iberdrola and Alstom were signed to uprate the reactors by 2010. A committee has been established to recommend on new nuclear plants and the most recent proposal is for one unit to come on line by 2015 with seven more to follow it by 2025.[64]

United States

Main article: Nuclear power in the United States

In 2004, there were 104 (69 pressurized water reactors, 35 boiling water reactors) commercial nuclear generating units licensed to operate in the United States, producing approximately 20 % of the country's energy needs. In absolute terms, the United States is the world's largest supplier of commercial nuclear power. Future development of nuclear power in the U.S. was enabled by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and is co-ordinated by the Nuclear Power 2010 Program.[65][66] On September 22, 2005 it was announced that two sites had been selected to receive new power reactors.[citation needed]

South America

Argentina

In Argentina, about 6% of the electricity comes from 2 operational reactors: The Embalse Río Tercero plant, a CANDU6 reactor, and the Atucha 1 plant, a PHWR German design. In 2001, the plant was modified to burn Slightly Enriched Uranium, making it the first PHWR reactor to burn that fuel worldwide.[citation needed] Atucha originally was planned to be a complex with various reactors. Atucha 2 (similar to Aucha 1 but more powerful) is actually more than half-built, however it never entered into operation. Argentina also has some other research reactors, and exports nuclear technology.

Brazil

Nuclear energy accounts for about 4% of the Brazil's electricity.[67] It produced by two reactors at Angra, which is Brazil's sole nuclear power plant, which consists of two Pressurized water reactors. A third reactor, Angra III, with a projected output of 1,350 MW, is planned to be finished by 2010, but work has been paralyzed due to environmental concerns and lack of funds. By 2025 Brazil plans to build seven more reactors.[68]

Chile

Although there is no commitment from the government to introduce nuclear energy, the debate is ongoing. In February 2007, the Energy Ministry of Chile announced that it was beginning technical studies into the development of nuclear power.[12]

See also

References

  1. ^ "50 Years of Nuclear Energy" (PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency. Retrieved 2007-07-13. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. ^ a b c "Survey of energy resources" (PDF). World Energy Council. 2004. Retrieved 2007-07-13. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ "Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2030" (PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency. July 2004. Retrieved 2007-07-13. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ a b "Nuclear Energy in Finland. Briefing Paper # 76". Uranium Information Centre. June 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  5. ^ "Special Eurobarometer 262: Energy Technologies: Knowledge, Perception, Measures" (PDF). European Commission. January 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-14. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. ^ "Nuclear renaissance faces realities". Platts. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  7. ^ L. Meeus, K. Purchala, R. Belmans. "Is it reliable to depend on import?" (PDF). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Departement of Electrical Engineering of the Faculty of Engineering. Retrieved 2007-07-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ "Energy Analysis of Power Systems". World Nuclear Association. March 2006. Retrieved 2006-05-19.
  9. ^ "Plans For New Reactors Worldwide". World Nuclear Association. May 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  10. ^ a b c "World Nuclear Power Reactors 2006-07 and Uranium Requirements". World Nuclear Association. 2007-05-31. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  11. ^ "Let a Thousand Reactors Bloom". WIRED magazine. 2004-09-12. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "Emerging Nuclear Energy Countries. Briefing Paper 102". Uranium Information Centre. June 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  13. ^ "Bangladesh To Build Nuclear Power Plant". Energy Daily. 2007-06-24. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  14. ^ a b "Plans For New Reactors Worldwide - Nuclear Issues Briefing Paper 19". April 2005. Retrieved 2006-05-19.
  15. ^ M. Somasekhar (2005-07-28). "India-US pact: Energising India's nuclear programme". The Hindu Business Line. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  16. ^ Soedyartomo Soentono (1997). "Nuclear power development in Indonesia" (PDF). National Atomic Energy Agency, Indonesia. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  17. ^ Tom McCawley (2007-05-15). "Indonesia looks to a nuclear future". Asia Times Online. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  18. ^ "Indonesia plans to build nuclear power plant by 2015". The Daily Times. 2006-05-14. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  19. ^ "Plan to build nuke plant in Muria peninsula not yet final: minister". Antara News. 2007-06-23. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  20. ^ "Thousands protest against nuclear power in Indonesia". Greenpeace. 2007-06-13. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  21. ^ "Gorontalo may build nuclear power plant in 2008". Antara News. 2007-06-18. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  22. ^ "Israel Should Develop Nuclear Energy". Agence France-Presse. 2007-01-23. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  23. ^ Yoav Stern (2007-06-12). "Jordan announces plans to build nuclear power plant by 2015". Haaretz. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  24. ^ Mark MacKinnon (2007-07-12). "Abdullah eyes Canadian nuclear reactor deal". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  25. ^ "Nuclear Energy Option and Energy Planning In Malaysia". Malaysian Nuclear Agency. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  26. ^ "Syria Profile. Nuclear Overview". Nuclear Threat Initiative. November 2006. Retrieved 2007-07-15. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  27. ^ Nareerat Wiriyapong (2007-06-12). "Thailand To Build First Nuclear Plant". Energy Daily. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  28. ^ "Thailand to build nuclear power plants". The Star Online. 2007-06-12. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  29. ^ Kathy Newnam (2005-08-11). "Uranium mining - dollars for death". Green Left Online. Retrieved 2007-07-13. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  30. ^ "Coalition of Nuclear-Free Countries". WISE News Communique. September 26, 1997. Retrieved 2006-05-19.
  31. ^ "Status of nuclear in current member states. Belgium". World Information Service on Energy. 2003-11-14. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  32. ^ M. V. Ramana (2003-01-30). "Op-ed: Phasing out nuclear power in Europe". Daily Times. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  33. ^ Ruffles, Philip (July 2003). "An Essential Programme to Underpin Government Policy on Nuclear Power" (PDF). Nuclear Task Force. Retrieved 2006-05-19. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  34. ^ "Addicted to nuclear energy?". Expatica. 2005-07-14. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  35. ^ "Nuclear Power in Czech Republic". World Nuclear Association. February 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-15.
  36. ^ a b "Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Nuclear Activities. Denmark" (PDF), Nuclear legislation in OECD countries, OECD/NEA, 2007, ISSN 1727-3854, retrieved 2007-07-14
  37. ^ "Nuclear Power in Denmark. Briefing Paper 99". Uranium Information Centre. December 2005. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  38. ^ "Finnish energy groups interested in building sixth nuclear reactor". Deutsche Presse-Agentur. 2007-03-28. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  39. ^ "E.ON Finland to buy plot for new nuclear reactor". AFX News. 2007-04-17. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  40. ^ "Nuclear Power in France. Briefing Paper 28". Uranium Information Centre. June 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  41. ^ "Significant nuclear-related news items in perspective". Uranium Information Centre weekly digest. 2006. ISSN 1326-4907. Retrieved 2006-05-19. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  42. ^ "German nuclear energy phase-out begins with first plant closure". Terra Daily. 2003-11-14. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  43. ^ Wolfgang Renneberg (2001-05-24). "Nuclear phase-out in Germany and the Challenges for Nuclear Regulation. Address". Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  44. ^ "German Parties Set to Clash Over Nuclear Power". Deutsche Welle. 2005-10-30. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  45. ^ Geir Moulson (2005-11-14). "Top parties approve pact that will make Merkel Germany's first woman chancellor". CBC News. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  46. ^ "Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Nuclear Activities. Greece" (PDF), Nuclear legislation in OECD countries, OECD/NEA, 2007, ISSN 1727-3854, retrieved 2007-07-14
  47. ^ Fatih Birol (1999). "Nuclear Power in the World Energy Outlook". World Nuclear Association. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  48. ^ "Energy R&D in Italy" (PDF). The Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. December 1999. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  49. ^ "Berlusconi reopens nuclear debate in Italy". Ireland Online. 2005-01-21. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  50. ^ "Nuclear Power Plant Project in Lithuania is Feasible. Press release". Lietuvos Energija. 2006-10-25. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  51. ^ "No Nukes Inforesource. The Netherlands". sterreichisches Ökologie Institut. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  52. ^ "Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Nuclear Activities. Norway" (PDF), Nuclear legislation in OECD countries, OECD/NEA, 2001, ISSN 1727-3854, retrieved 2007-07-14
  53. ^ "Norwegian industry wants nuclear energy". The Norway Post. 2007-05-23. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  54. ^ Liz Williams (2007-05-24). "Green nuclear power coming to Norway". Cosmos Online. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  55. ^ Latek, Stanislaw (April 2005), Nuclear news from Poland, European Nuclear Society, retrieved 2007-07-14
  56. ^ "Countries which had concrete plans for nuclear power reactors, or actually start construction and cancelled all plans, or even phased out nuclear energy". World Information Service on Energy. 1998-11-16. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  57. ^ "Iberian Peninsula Energy Data. Electricity". U.S. Energy Information Agency. June 2006. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  58. ^ "Spain halts nuclear power". WISE News Communique. May 24, 1991. Retrieved 2006-05-19.
  59. ^ "Nuclear Power in Spain". World Nuclear Association. May 2006. Retrieved 2006-05-19.
  60. ^ "Nuclear Europe: Country guide". BBC. 2006-02-16. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  61. ^ "Spain says "Adios" to nuclear power". Greenpeace. 2006-05-31. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  62. ^ "McGuinty Government Delivers A Balanced Plan For Ontario's Electricity Future". Ontario Ministry of Energy. 2006-06-13. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  63. ^ "Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Nuclear Activities. Mexico" (PDF), Nuclear legislation in OECD countries, OECD/NEA, 2003, ISSN 1727-3854, retrieved 2007-07-14
  64. ^ "Nuclear Power in Mexico. Briefing Paper 106". Uranium Information Centre. June 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  65. ^ "Congress Passes First Comprehensive Energy Bill in 13 Years" (PDF). TNuclear Energy Institute. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  66. ^ Chasity Brown (2005-07-14). "Commission, City support NuStart". The Daily Sentinel. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
  67. ^ "Nuclear Power in Brazil. Briefing Paper # 95". Uranium Information Centre. May 2007. Retrieved 2007-05-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  68. ^ "Brazil plans to build seven nuclear reactors". Mecropress. 23 October 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_energy_policy&oldid=144863604"