Wikipedia:Harmonious editing club/Members

The following Wikipedians are volunteer members of the Harmonious Editing Club. If you would like to join, add your name to the list after agreeing to this (short) list of guidelines:

• Always aim to end edit wars by helping editors reach a compromise.
• Never revert more than once — always take it to the talk page.
• Avoid triggering edit wars — discuss major and/or controversial changes on the talk page beforehand.
• Request input from the wider community when necessary (e.g., at Peer review, Requests for comment, Requests for page protection, Village pump, etc.)
• Politely remind others not to make abusive remarks, keeping wikiquette and civility in mind at all times.
• Archive talk pages when they get too long or tangled.
• Be bold (not reckless) in editing

You are free to remove your name from the list at any time.

Members

In order to flaunt your membership and to promote our project Fig has created a userbox to be placed on your userpage:

This user is proud to be a member of the Harmonious Editing Club.

= {{HEC userbox}}

1. A D Monroe III ^talk Really, it's the only way to be constructive.
2. Addesso Wow, talking as a form of constructively and peacefully solving disputes. That is so . . . out-of-the-box, radical thinking! I'm in!
3. Addhoc On reflection, being able to go up to 3RR doesn't really help.
4. Alarob (Rob C)
5. Alex756 (glad to see there are voluntary associations forming on Wikipedia)
6. Algotr
7. Alx-pl D
8. Alex Plank
9. — Ambush Commander^(Talk)
10. Aminullah
11. Anchoress per DeathPhoenix :-))
12. Andrewa
13. [[User:Consequencefree|Ardent^†_∈]] =D Diplomats unite! Harmony can thrive with a few dedicated people. Make the Wiki a better place!
14. Arminius - happy to help with disputes
15. Asbestos - Talk pages should always be used after a revert (except in the case of vandalism or trolls, of course)
16. Ashibaka talk
17. AvB
18. Ben Aveling
19. Benc
20. Beth Wellington 23:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Sounds good to me.
21. Bogdan
22. Buddhipriya 03:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
23. Catwhoorg
24. Chairman S. ^Talk
25. Chancemill
26. Chazz88
27. Chriswaterguy Good principles. Happy to lend a hand if needed.
28. cjllw | TALK
29. ClockworkSoul
30. Comatose51
31. Comaze
32. Coppertwig Anyway, I try to stick to 1RR, and I believe in, you know, harmony and all that.
33. CP/M
34. Daduzi
35. Dan100
36. David Spalding ^Talk/_Contribs Bringing Order to chaos can also mean bringing Collaboration to clashing and Consensus to contention
37. David Strauss
38. ∞wirelain - We have cousins over at WP:CCD.
39. Deathphoenix - I've been doing this anyway, so why not sign up?
40. Deebkie ^talk
41. dewet|✉
42. Drenched Harmony rocks. Editing rocks too. Harmonious editing rocks especially hard.
43. Driken
44. Durova 18:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
45. Denni
46. — Dzonatas
47. User:Ed Poor - on probation for "tendentious editing" (oh, the shame, the shame!)
48. Encephalon | ^ζ  This is good.
49. Ethnopunk Do we really have to lose our edits to morons?
50. User:Euyyn - per Deathphoenix
51. Falphin
52. Fishal
53. Flammifer - I'm certainly interested in tackling and improving divisive issues !
54. Flora_b_1
55. Evrenosogullari
56. Fredrik - the description above seems to apply to me
57. Friday - Sounds good to me.
58. Glenn Willen
59. ··gracefool |☺ - this club needs to grow!
60. Groove1279 - Because Wikipedia is about "WE" not "ME" ;)
61. Iirolaiho
62. ike9898
63. ikkyu2 (talk)
64. Ilyanep If I start to violate the above rules, please stick my ass in a freezer. :D
65. Ingoolemo
66. INic I'm only here 'cause I'm an evil, stinking troll in need of redemption
67. Jondel 06:44, 15 August 2005 (UTC) - I heard this club is strictly restricted to good looking people only?  :)
68. Juraj Betak
69. JCarriker
70. Jehochman 15 August 2006
71. Jet123
72. JFW | T@lk
73. J-V Heiskanen (as long as the above are going to be the final and only bylaws of this club)
74. Jokermage ^{"Timor Mentum Occidit"}
75. Joshua — worth a try
76. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @
77. kaal
78. kawaputra
79. Keesiewonder ^talk -- I have trouble w/not reverting what I perceive as vandalism multiple times though ...
80. kevthegreat55 I'll do my best
81. Kodama will try to be friendly...
82. User:KrakatoaKatie - Harmony and me are pretty good company...
83. Laleena
84. Lisapollison I also self-designate as a trial member, & aspire to full membership
85. Lquilter self-designates as a trial member, & aspires to full membership
86. Ludraman
87. Manscher
88. — mark ✎
89. Marshman (I think I have passed through the early un-harmonious stage relatively unscathed)
90. — Matt Crypto 10:41, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
91. Mbbradford -- Don't worry, this is not Esperanza
92. Meelar
93. MONGO I need harmonizing...
94. Neigel von Teighen ready to put some harmony!
95. — File:Austria flag large.png ナイトスタリオン _ㇳ–ㇰ — — I'm in.
96. Neutrality what Ruhrjung said.
97. nobs
98. Ombudsman
99. Omphaloscope — ready to sing my part
100. Paleorthid What Saxifrage said.
101. Paul venter Harmonious editing sounds like an oxymoron, but let's show good faith!
102. Pedant A lot of articles, I don't even edit, just add to the discussion what seems good or bad about it. I'll help on anything.
103. Perl
104. Pufferfish101
105. Randy
106. Ravn, Strong support. ;)
107. Rdsmith4 - Oh, why not. Is there a Category:Lost causes?
108. Revived
109. richard Spread harmonious editing, join the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal!
110. Rickyrab
111. royblumy
112. Ruhrjung has been with you in the heart all the time (the deeds might be another matter)
113. sasawat
114. Rursus 100% agreed by prev speaker.
115. Saxifrage Because the willow survives the storm that fells the oak.
116. Schmiteye
117. Seth Mahoney Yay! for harmony!
118. Shannon
119. Simon 19:33, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
120. SlimVirgin I think the decision to self-limit on reverting is a good idea.
121. Smyth
122. Sobar I never knew this club existed. I think this is great.
123. Spalding
124. Stephen B Streater while noting that agreement does not require compromise
125. Stevertigo
126. Subramanian ^talk -- Ahimsa, everyone!
127. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ]
128. Superm401 | Talk
129. T-dot ( talk ^contribs )
130. TAS
131. Tatteredpaper | (^talk)
132. The Placebo Effect
133. The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake
134. TheronJ Good idea
135. Timbo
136. Toby Bartels
137. User:Tony Sidaway
138. T.PK Ready for some harmonizing!
139. Trade2tradewell If you want to improve your POV , be ready to listen to the other
140. Trubadurix Sounds good
141. Tuf-Kat
142. Umofomia
143. utcursch
144. visctrix
145. WikiLen — learning how to have 1 revert work
146. WikiprojectOWU
147. WikiUser
148. Wing Nut
149. Xinit
150. Xiong Chiamiov
151. Zappaz. A tall order for a person with my character, but worth striving for!
152. Ze miguel
153. Zero
154. Mac_Davis (talk · contribs) - I always wanted to be a prime number.
155. Bunty.Gill - newbie@harmonious edits club
156. --Irmgard 17:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
157. JiMoThY^TALK
158. John Pritchard - that's what this is, wikipedia, isn't it? whew.
159. --Brrk.3001 06:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Im in!
160. --Sir james paul 12:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
161. Ruthfulbarbarity 03:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
162. Davandron
163. NinaEliza (talk • contribs • logs) 20:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
164. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ 11:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Love to give it a shot..
165. BenBurch 20:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC) I shall strive to live up to this in all my future edits. --BenBurch 20:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
166. Pavithran|Talk - Good initiative! Keep it up guys!
167. Shack_★Talk，I like it. And actually Harmonious editing was the purpose of Wikipedia, who like seeing Wikipedia quarrel endlessly? 08:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
168. SmokeyJoe "Wikipedia is not here to make people sad. So we want to respond in a helpful and loving way." 21:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
169. john196920022001 An early experience on Wikipedia involved an edit war with an uncivil editor. Before I knew any better I contributed to that edit war. In researching incivility I found this club
170. User:Abridged -- I like this idea. Abridged 19:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
171. User:Jedi feline This sounds like a good idea, especially for music pages where there are genre disputes that could easily be resolved but aren't.
172. User:Cyrillic Great Idea...let's join our hands knights of Wikipedia!
173. Wooyi^{Talk, Editor review} 01:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
174. What a great club! --Shirahadasha 03:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
175. nadav (talk) 10:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
176. In the most sincere manner, -A Sprig of Fig & a lock of holly 17:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
177. Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _{talk contrib} 18:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC) [I agree with the current aims and endeavor to follow them (which I think I generally have done in past edits). I was going to join a year back; no idea why I didn't.)
178. Kotare 07:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC) What a great concept, the guidelines of this club are well thought out and intelliegent and if followed will tremendously reduce the amount of unproductive conflict on wikipedia.
179. Mooncrest
180. Shruti14 Great idea!!
181. Crypter 23:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC) I'm new but this sounds great
182. Rycr 11:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
183. Bardofcornish 00:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC) sounds like a great way to promote wikilove!!
184. Meristat 22:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
185. Tr1290 16:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)