|reject = Unfortunately, there was a problem with your filing and it has been rejected. Please see [[Wikipedia:Abuse response/INSERT IP HERE]] for details on why the filing was rejected. You may also review [[Wikipedia:Abuse response/Filing instructions|filing criteria]] for abuse reports filings.
|reject = Unfortunately, there was a problem with your filing and it has been rejected. Please see [[Wikipedia:Abuse response/INSERT IP HERE]] for details on why the filing was rejected. You may also review [[Wikipedia:Abuse response/Filing instructions|filing criteria]] for abuse reports filings.
|close = We wanted to let you know that the case for the report you filed for INSERT IP HERE has been '''''closed'''''. Thank you again for filing and alerting us of this IP's abusive behavior.
|close = We wanted to let you know that the case for the report you filed for INSERT IP HERE has been '''''closed'''''. Thank you again for filing and alerting us of this IP's abusive behavior.
}}
== vandalism ==
==Your Abuse Response Filing==
[[Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|30px]] Greetings! Thank you for filing an [[WP:Abuse|Abuse Report]] for abusive behavior originating from [[Wikipedia:Abuse response/prashantsingh1142|prashantsingh1142]]. {{ #switch: thanks
|thanks = We wanted to let you know that the case has been opened and is currently under investigation.
|reject = Unfortunately, there was a problem with your filing and it has been rejected. Please see [[Wikipedia:Abuse response/prashantsingh1142]] for details on why the filing was rejected. You may also review [[Wikipedia:Abuse response/Filing instructions|filing criteria]] for abuse reports filings.
|close = We wanted to let you know that the case for the report you filed for prashantsingh1142 has been '''''closed'''''. Thank you again for filing and alerting us of this IP's abusive behavior.
}}
}}
Revision as of 10:47, 29 May 2011
Shahid is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Welcome to my talk page! Please leave a message and I will reply to you as fast as possible!:)
I put citations next to Aamir Khan's name is because someone keep on switching between Aamir and Salman...So, i thought if i put citations they won't switch it...that's all...thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.222.243 (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re your messages: I semi-protected the article again. The user is effectively banned, so there isn't much anybody can do about that. I filed another SPI report to check for sleepers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: That account was picked up in the SPI sleeper check. If you ever run into any more sockpuppets, do feel free to file another SPI report. The CU are happy to sweep through these. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I really think the blocking admin owes me an apology. He also took away my rollback rights without reviewing the case properly. This is really insulting. Shahid • Talk2me20:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nope haven't seen it, not my cup of tea, although generally I like Fincher's satirical sense of humor in his films. Yeah I think I'll go and see True Grit, much more my sort of film. A western these days too is pretty rare. What's Zinta up to these days?♦ Dr. Blofeld17:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have gotten permission to use a publicity shot on Wikipedia but have no idea to what can I license it as. I would be very thankful if you could help me out, I uploaded it but it got removed immediately. Aryan1992 (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WRT "Will source it today."
As you are an established contributor I was surprised at your comment diff. Re-adding unsourced personal information in this way would normally lead to warnings for non-regulars. Is there any reason that you feel that the BLP policy should not apply in this case? Thanks, Fæ (talk) 10:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Barnstar
Thank you for the barnstar! It is an honor to be receiving one from you. =) I blocked the most recent socks and filed yet another SPI to look for sleepers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re:language scripts
Dear Shahid, I am still convinced that both Devanagari and Nastaliq scripts have a place in the article in light of my comments here. Since the two of us are very hidebound in our respective positions, I feel the best idea is to have a group of neutral administrators evaluate the issue and then draw a conclusion on it. I hope this helps. Thanks, AnupamTalk04:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
New message
Hey Shahid, remember how we wanted to start a discussion about adding other "notable" awards to an actor's filmography. Well, after thinking about this, I thought that this wouldn't be a good idea because it would increase the size of the article (I noticed this when I was working on Kapoor's article in my sandbox). Finally, I came up with this template as it would allow us to format an actor's wins/nominations in a proper and structured way. This is what you end up with. I am thinking of implementing this layout on other actors' award pages as well. What do you think? -- BollywoodDreamztalk19:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shahid it looks like all of the "Indiatimes" links are not working anymore and this problem has been occuring for a long time. At first I thought it was just a temporary thing but this isn't the case. :( This brings me to the question I wanted to ask you: Kapoor's article currently features a review of Chameli from Indiatimes (Subhash K Jha). Since the link doesn't work anymore, I was able to find the same review on "Glamsham.com". Do you think it would be okay if I changed it to that? -- BollywoodDreamztalk19:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All quiet there now, semi protected for three months. If an article receives a similar amount of ip reverts then it is better to request semi protection than to keep having the article disrupted and having to constantly revert it, its a shame but if all the unconfirmed ip accounts are doing is vandalism then what to do. Many thanks for your contributions in 2010 and best wishes to you and your families and friends in 2011, and you User:BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ, happy new year. Off2riorob (talk) 20:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
She really seems to go for German looking blokes with curly hair doesn't she!! This new bloke reminds me of Michael Ballack when he has longer curly hair. Not only is the guy stinking rich but has Shania for a wife and lives in Switzerland, one of the most scenic places on earth. So unfair!!!♦ Dr. Blofeld17:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please go to the talk page for Udita Goswami ASAP. I edited the article with a valid source (a real interview) and a certain person keeps changing the article to his edit with unreliable sources. It's becoming really pathetic. AyanP (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Ayan[reply]
Dear Shahid! That certain person happens to be me. Do be kind enough to check the talk page for Udita Goswami as well as the talk page for AyanP. You are sure to notice the personal attacks that he has made on me with phrases like 'fool' and 'stop pushing your agenda' in addition to mocking my home state. I am glad the guy called for your intervention, I wish to do the same and would very much wish that you intervene. I haven't been involved in an editing war ever but I am afraid this is turning into one. Happy if you could help.
Killerdove 04:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerdove (talk • contribs)
Katrina Kaif
Hi amigo, when you are on line could you have a quick look at the edit request on this BLP, my Hindi consists of hello goodbye and a few other useful phrases and numbers and I definitely can't read it or tell the difference between this dialect and that one thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Baghban.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles03:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clint Eastwood
Hey buddy. This is currently going under GA review. I've condensed it down from 157kb to 86kb!! The GA reviwer said it must be below 60. I disagreed as if it is cut much below 80kb it will start to affect its comprehensiveness. Nehrams is going to do a little further cutting and imporvements later, it could still do with some copyediting. Zinta is currently 73kb so to expect Clint Eastwood who has been in films since 1954 to have an article below 60kb is a little extreme I think..♦ Dr. Blofeld17:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I know, and Changeling is 121 kb and a featured article, so an article on Clint's career at 80kb is quite good I think. Well,we'll see how it goes...♦ Dr. Blofeld17:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And still Tony's grilling goes on and on. It really makes you think twice about bothering with GAs. This is easily the most fussy GA review I've ever encountered and I have over 60 of them. He expects it to be perfect and in all honesty don't think he has much experience with GA review, he's treating it virtually as an FAC. Wow google image Sarah Shahi....♦ Dr. Blofeld18:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Most of his comments have been valid. But the article has near 300 references and it is way more comprehensive than most GA candidates.♦ Dr. Blofeld20:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Has Yellow Monkey retired? They hounded him and voted to remove his photo polls onto a sub page it seems and he has not returned since. He isn't answering his emails. What happened? Surely he is thicker skinned than that?? ♦ Dr. Blofeld12:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
socks
Hi there. This is the second time in a month that you have marked someone that was asking me for help as a sock. First User:Taribhen and then suspected User:Rapidfire1. How do you know, how do you prove it, and how do they get blocked? What else are you working on these days? I am trying to moderate a couple of warring editors on Mallika Sherawat, but not having a great deal of success. Some people just refuse to compromise. Also, Sholay is sitting in the GA queue waiting for a reviewer to pick it up. BollyJeff||talk02:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. If you get a minute, could you throw in your opinion on Mallika Sherawat? They say they want more editors to weigh in, but it may just be a stalling tactic. I think they just want to wear each other down. BollyJeff||talk14:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. BTW, the recent edit to Bollywood does not seem right to me. I am thinking the source meant Cinema of India as a whole. Bollywood alone does not make over 500 films a year. Cinema of India articles says it was 235 in 2009. BollyJeff||talk17:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Star Screen Award
No problems mate, I didn't see the awards so have no clue about it. Don't know why its not mentioned in the source but thanks for the info.--- Managerarc talk19:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Over the past several years, I have noticed that an actor's win depends on the film's performance at the box office rather than his/her work in the film. If you were to take a look at the winners of mostly all the Indian award ceremonies, you would know what I'm talking about. This would explain how Shernaz Patel's performance in Guzaarish was completely overlooked and I do agree that she deserved the award. Frankly speaking, I thought Hrithik deserved the award over SRK. As for the Best Actress award, I have not seen Ishqiya & BBB (maybe if I saw them I would change my mind but out of the other 3 nominees I do think that Kajol deserved the award). Bebo's character in G3 is similar to that of JWM so if you liked her performance there, you would like her performance in G3 as well. -- BollywoodDreamztalk19:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
...you have having problems with a particular edit warrior, which you warned. Please note that he has been blocked here yet again. If you have problems again with him, please inform me or the Administrators. Thanks --SH23:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I just reverted you edits, I have added reference which is credible ie The Telegraph India. Also if people travel from place to place for work reason that doesnt mean they change there residence daily. Whenever celebrities change there home like Abhishek Bachchan, Aishwarya Rai etc, it get fairly enough coverage in Media. Hope this clarify the doubt, happy editing KuwarOnlineTalk12:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind as long as the sources are up-to-date and it follows the required criteria. Not that if a person was born in a place where he currently also resides, his residence need not be added. Thanks, Shahid • Talk2me14:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Re:Bollywood Top-Grossing movies list
I agree with you. The copyright concern wasn't in the original AFD nomination, it was raised later only by the nominator. Now that the issue is with the copyright admins, nothing much can be done than to wait for their verdict. I don't know much about how WP:NFC works but I'm sure the page will not be deleted. --- Managerarc talk07:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shahrukh Khan or Shah Rukh Khan?
Hi. What proof do you have that his name is 2 words instead of 3? Why not add some text with a source that explains why there is the discrepancy? Otherwise you will have to keep fighting this battle. You can't just says "it is so" without some proof. BollyJeff||talk16:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I understand what you are saying about the burden, but the issue is not old to the new people that go on WP every day. A little prose explaining the situation would go a long way I think. How can it be that the spelling of the name of possibly the world's biggest star is not clear? BollyJeff||talk17:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do not agree with the other guy about the text. It was bad the way he wrote it. I know that there are lots of movies, books, etc. that have it either way. All I would like to see is the same thing that you usually ask for in articles: a RELIABLE SOURCE saying that his original name is Shahrukh, and maybe why it got morphed to Shah Rukh. If that exists, please add it. Didn't it come up in the discussion that you refer to? Can you point me to that? BollyJeff||talk17:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
2000s Bollywood films are far better agreed. But pre 1990 Bollywood film articles on here are as bad as some of the Malayalam/south indian cinema articles we have on here. Sadly practically nobody seems interested in older Hindi films. I would love to see some GA articles on Nargis films etc... ♦ Dr. Blofeld11:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. Yes its sad that we can't access decent info about some of the older films. We really ought to have more Bollywood GAs. Maybe info on some films does exist in biographies of Nargis etc. Info like this. Oooohhh check out this... . ♦ Dr. Blofeld12:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! But I am attempting to compile material to develop Mother India into a GA class article, I've begun developing a themes section. ♦ Dr. Blofeld13:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I noticed the copyvio notice and the deleted article in the template. It seems absurd to be that figures can be copyrightable. But the argument is "they are not actual figures but estimates". Its a bit extreme, but then Moonriddengirl is very strict in regards to possible copyvios.. I will try to get Mother India up to a GA standard although production notes I doubt I will be able to access. Mughal-e-Azam also intrigues me, you like it?♦ Dr. Blofeld14:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that can go in the themes section for critical commentary... Its getting there. I think it could make GA without production notes as they don't appear to exist. We'll see after a few days of work on it.♦ Dr. Blofeld16:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. Mmm I did like the new poster as it really looks more like a 1950s classic film. OK no images and that later pink poster then it is..♦ Dr. Blofeld12:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
She's not "super hot" looking or anything but she's still gorgeous in my opinion. But it is her looks combined with her intelligence and personality which is exactly my type. Many "super hot women" lack qualities in the brain and personality department anyway!♦ Dr. Blofeld17:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here No, I wouldn't describe her as good looking. But then I think her extremely short hair and glasses don't help. She's OK , but pretty average looking if you consider how stunning Halle is. ♦ Dr. Blofeld18:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, check out the improved page of Raavanan with extra reviews added. Both the reviews and the box office are extremely positive, at least more than Guru and Jodhaa Akbar. Check each and every review, plus the box office returns of both the movies and compare it to Raavana. It is better than them, both box-offce wise and reviews-wise. Sanjay911 (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay thanks. She was invited by the Academy, so I added that part along with The Hindu's link and another direct video link where she herself confirms it. In the link you cited she was appreciated for her fashion sense so I added up that too.
Btw, this is kinda dumb but where is 'Raavanans talk page so that I can put forward my argument? I know, dumb. But I'm new. So please help! Thanks! :)Sanjay911 (talk) 05:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shahid
Hello my name is Nav and I wanted to thank you for your constant monitoring and preservation of the madhubala page i wrote a few years ago. I spent a great deal of time and effort expanding and writing the previous page which was largely inacurate and full of gossip, so your constant reverting of irrelevent and incorrect additions etc is GREATLY appreciated since i rarely have the time to do so myself.
I also wrote pages on vintage actresses Nimmi and Ameeta though being less prolific than Madhubala, thier pages remain largely intact ;o)
Thanks again for your efforts and defence of my entry
Warm Regards
Nav
Navsikand (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use File:Rekha80.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rekha80.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The image is irreplaceable because no free images showing an actor in a film can be found. The rationale clearly explains why the image adheres to WP:NONFREE and particularly its eighth caluse. Many featured articles use non-free images. Shahid • Talk2me13:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Need your help. Can you add a music section and elaborate on what I added. The says talks of a Holt song which Bachcan sings which is one of India's best known folk songs. Can you verify and improve it?♦ Dr. Blofeld19:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Who in your view is one of the worst actresses in Hollywood. It has to be Denise Richards who is onscreen for being nothing but a pretty face. Her filmography in the last ten years says it all. Easily the worst Bond girl ever.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld19:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is she an actress? She's a socialite who has appeared in some films, like Kim Kardashian, another talentless fame whore. Dunno, Meryl Streep and Cate Blanchett are my favourites. Judi Dench and Helen Mirren are also great.♦ Dr. Blofeld20:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I think Selena is absolutely gorgeous, just so cute and seems a lovely girl. She's a knock out for sure but I kind of feel like a paedo about it LOL, I dunno, she's 18 but just seems very young that's all, like she was only 3 years old when I started comprehensive school!... She can certainly do better than Justin Bieber though, annoying little git.♦ Dr. Blofeld19:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Its a pretty good feeling. After watching how User:Dr. Blofeld plowed through Mother India so quickly, I may soon be getting the hang of this thing. He uses GoogleBooks quite a bit. If you have any other advice or article writing tips for me, I am listening. I failed to get Shriya Saran to GA because the reviewer was blocking many sources as unreliable, but when they were removed there was not enough content left. I guess its a lot harder to get BLPs than films to GA. BollyJeff||talk20:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the GA section in the talk page. There were many other sources that were rejected, and removed, but not the ones that you mentioned, except Idlebrain and behindwoods.com. I kept the ones I did only because they were just for awards. BollyJeff||talk21:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It would make a massive difference if you could both add some google book references to articles like Andaz (1971 film). Even 2 or 3 references makes a big difference to unsourced.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Excellent. A goal might be to get some book references into all of the films listed in the top Bollywood list. The original list can be accessed from before it was marked as "copyright". I'll definitely give a helping hand.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld17:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
i want to award u a barnstar
hey i want to award u a barnstar and i will .i am impressed with preity zinta article.keep it up.You and ranbirk are truely amazing guys.
Re your message: Reprotecting the page is in order since the old protection expired. I reset it for another six months. That will help with that article, but will not help with his other habit of undoing all of your edits. I filed another SPI report for the new account. If you find any more accounts, do report them to SPI as there always seems to be sleepers that are found. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: The CU came back really fast and picked up three additional accounts: One already used and two that had not. Do feel free to file an SPI report as soon as you see any other socks. Waiting for me to file it will just allow him to get in more edits. The SPI form makes it easy to file a new report. Just make sure you request a checkuser on the report. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Shshshsh. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Liz
Hello friend. To be honest she was one of the few old Hollywood stars I never liked. Too much of a diva, and eight husbands says it all!!! I can't believe though she was younger than Clint Eastwood! I've been playing the following on the piano. see this. B flat minor, B flat diminished, E flat minor, B flat minor G flat major, F 7 etc. Genius.♦ Dr. Blofeld15:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
LOL Shirley Maclaine was one of the few I didn't like either!! Great actress but a hard nosed bitch. She's one of the few female co-stars that Clint Eastwood didn't try to seduce. Both he and Don Siegel said she was harder than most men!!♦ Dr. Blofeld15:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
She is supposed to be quite a difficult person I think. Her article really ought to be much better than it is, but then again most old Hollywood greats have lousy articles on here.♦ Dr. Blofeld16:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Its hard to think that Clint Eastwood was older than both liz and James Dean. I mean James Dean and Liz Taylor had accomplished so much by only 24, Eastwood didn't even have his first audition until that age. He only really became super famous in the mid 1960s.♦ Dr. Blofeld21:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I only saw NOKJ and I actually liked it. All I can say is that Ms. Mukerji finally learnt that working with YRF won't get you anywhere. LOL :) BTW this is so pathetic! Does it remind you of anything? -- BollywoodDreamztalk19:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well I wanted to show you that it is possible to write good articles on such old films.. Its a site called Qwiki. It used wikipedia text and displays it as a sort of media portfolio with it spoken and some nice pictures. Users can submit links on youtube and photos which can be used to illustrate it. E.g Preity Zinta clips on youtube can be recommended.♦ Dr. Blofeld19:09, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think I can get Dil Se up to a B class status. But GA, I doubt the critical coverage of it is all that substantial in books... I'll look into it over the next few days.♦ Dr. Blofeld19:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Will resume with Dil Se tomorrow, Can you condense/improve the quality of the plot for me and then I'll resume writing it.♦ Dr. Blofeld21:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Mr. Shahid. Not your cup of tea? Dil Se is proving to be difficult, not sure I can find enough decent material to get beyond B. It has at least improved though!..♦ Dr. Blofeld15:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You see this?. Prepared for GA and nominated. Not only completely reverted, my GA nomination reverted and page locked to prevent my version going through and being promoted because Giano is more important that wikipedia's GA and FA content. Seem right to you? Is this a complete miscarriage of justice and a perfect example of the mess wikipedia administration is in with such extreme double standards?♦ Dr. Blofeld09:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
reply
Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. This was mainly aimed at Bollywooddreamz because he reverted an edit that was exactly liked one of yours and then ridiculed the guy for it. It leaves me (and I am sure other outside observers) wondering why its okay in one place and not in the other. It seems to me that for consistency sake, the articles should be treated the same. If you really believed that your edit on Priyanka was right, then I would think that you should agree with what the other guy did on Kareena, and not take 'Dreamz side. Likewise, if you think the way it is on Kareena is okay, then put it back that way on Priyanka too. I would really like to see it the same way on both articles. Otherwise I am left wondering how to write up these things on other articles that I might edit. But please don't take offense; things often come off more harsh in writing than in speech. You know that we are friends on here. BollyJeff||talk01:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Over the past several months, I only managed to catch NOKJ & Patiala House - the latter proves what Kumar can actually do if he stops doing these "mindless" comedies. What about you? -- BollywoodDreamztalk19:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have been a fan of Vidya since she made her debut with Parineeta; she reminds me of the yestyear actresses. Anushka Sharma is another actress that I am growing fond of. As for the actors, I like Pratik Babbar and Ranbir Kapoor. Ranveer Singh isn't that bad either... though I have to see what else he does with his new-found success. -- BollywoodDreamztalk19:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but I completely disagree with the SRK intro. Tom Cruise, Will Smith, Brad Pitt etc we do not claim them to be "one of the world's biggest movie stars" even though they are. To me a westerner it seems extremely out of place to claim he is one of the world biggest movie stars when the fact is the vast majority have not even heard of him in the UK and Europe. Seriously if I did a survey Who is Shadrukh Khan? to my home town out of 50,000, 49,000 at least would not have heard of him. This is why you must clarify that he he is perhaps the biggest movie star in Asia with massive populations but not as well known in Europe. Sorry mate but he really isn'y well known in UK and Europe even though I believe they made a Madame Tussauds one of him for the British Indians. This is why it looks out of place. Either accept my change or remove the claim please. The current version looks highly Indian-centric and not a genuine reflection of the truth. He is far from being one of the biggest movie stars in Europe, North and South America. The claim is indeed true if you account for Asian populations and diaspora compared to the overall world population but that's because there is a disproportionate number of Asians in the world to other continents. It needs to be clarified. ♦ Dr. Blofeld17:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would be nice to get his article up to GA of course... Thing is a lot of people don't know he is one of the biggest movie stars in the world! I think its OK to say so as long as it implies that it means overall, which I think the current version makes clear... Anyway I think this coming week I'll draft up an improved version in my user space and then we can copy edit it and hopefully promote to GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld20:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FYI
I have written an Edit Filter in an attempt to help with the sock that keeps following you. I can't tell you how it works, but hopefully it will help a little. The filter is currently set in a log only mode in order to check its effectiveness. I know that he is not around every day, but if you spot him over the next couple of days, can you leave me a note so I can check to see if the filter would have caught him? Or you can file another SPI report as I'm watching that page. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, AB is on the cover of KANK, so he belongs there. My take is whoever is on the poster/DVD cover are the major actors that should go in the infobox, or at least be at the top of the list. BollyJeff||talk21:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If not the poster, then I think whoever has the leading roles, or most screen time, should determine the order, not acting seniority, unless the screen time is similar. On Sholay, I think other people chose the order, why? In this case, I understand that Dharmendra was the bigger star at the time, which is why he is first. BollyJeff||talk23:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Re
Hey buddy, I am doing fine. Its just that over the past several months I have noticed that a lot of links are dying and I am unable to find a replacement of them or sometimes even an archived version of a source that already died. Just as a precautionary measure, I thought it would be good if we archived sources while they were stil working... something that I thought of while going through the article of Taare Zameen Par. If you take a look at Zinta's article, there are a lot of dead links now and an archived version of these sources can't be found anymore. (P.S. BTW how do you check the size of the article?) -- BollywoodDreamztalk17:06, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So you're telling me that if the "original" link dies (even after finding an archived version of it), the archived version won't work on WP anymore? As for the size of the article, I'm talking about finding out its length. -- BollywoodDreamztalk17:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I now understand what you are saying. Thanks for letting me know about that. I thought that an archived version would continue working even though if the original version was dead. -- BollywoodDreamztalk17:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Chirag69.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
"No, sorry, it's not done. Wikipedia uses internal wikilinks, not external links in the text."
Oh my bad, didnt know that. Yea, never seen external links in the text anywhere else. Apologies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prashantserai (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Udit Narayan
Hi,
I thought Udit Narayan was originally from Nepal and not India, but on here (wiki) it is written India. I also read some facts about Udit and there it was stated he was born in Nepal. Now, i am in doubt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torreslfchero (talk • contribs) 09:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from INSERT IP HERE. We wanted to let you know that the case has been opened and is currently under investigation.
vandalism
Your Abuse Response Filing
Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from prashantsingh1142. We wanted to let you know that the case has been opened and is currently under investigation.
Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from INSERT IP HERE. We wanted to let you know that the case has been opened and is currently under investigation.