User talk:Kmzayeem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:46, 13 June 2013


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #179

Zayeem's talk page

Replaceable fair use File:My 31st Demerit.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:My 31st Demerit.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sculptures of Bangladesh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BC, The Daily Star and Paharpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:My 31st Demerit.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:My 31st Demerit.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Chittagong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jute mill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Excellent job you are doing on articles about Chittagong. Keep them coming! Ahnaaf (talk) 10:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1st barnstar for me, after lots of troubles. Was much needed, Thanks :D --Zayeem ^(talk) 10:29, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Greetings! Hope your well. I need your help. Can you please? Thanks, NickAang (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes sure, tell me. Zayeem ^(talk) 07:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your kind reply. Please, check here first. I've created and contributed many articles but some were given to me by their owners and when I found enough sources then I create them on wikipedia. But a user is keep blamming me of doing articles for my profit even being aware of WP:WIALPI and Wikipedia:Paid editing. Is there any way I can request a neutral editor to check all the articles I created? This will be a great help. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He might be a patroller to avert vandalism in Wikipedia. You can seek help from WP:DR. But be advised to choose your words wisely. You have been saying that the articles have been given to you by their owners. You should know that there is no ownership of articles in Wikipedia and you can't term anyone as the owner of an article. This would further strengthen the doubt of the accusers. Zayeem ^(talk) 05:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the advise. I don't think he follows WP:RCP properly and also you may check this. Best Regards, NickAang (talk) 06:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadarghat, Chittagong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sadarghat, Chittagong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LlamaAl (talk) 20:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EPZ thana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on EPZ thana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LlamaAl (talk) 20:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article at your request. I think its retention is borderline, but having it here obviously does no harm.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I was actually busy with some other more important articles so couldn't expand these stubs, but now I'm done with those articles and will try to expand the stubs. Thanks again! --Zayeem ^(talk) 14:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sport in Bangladesh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Wimbledon, Squash, Asian, Rugby, Grandmaster, Handball, Test matches and Athletics

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Improving articles

Hi, we meet again! It's excellent how you are making articles related to Chittagong. But please don't just copy paste text from the Chittagong article, like you did in History of Chittagong and Economy of Chittagong.

Cheers Ahnaaf (talk) 15:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to start an article on the topics and decided to improve it later. I've also attributed the copied edits in the talk pages of those articles. Thanks --Zayeem ^(talk) 15:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kmzayeem. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 10:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Kmzayeem. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
Message added 16:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of association football rivalries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Hilli

Battle of Hilli was part of Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. In the Bangladesh Liberation War Campaign box, it is not there, the Battle of Hilli is in the campaign box of Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, Secondly, do NOT pose authority! Use talk page from now onward in case of conflict. Faizan (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Battle of Hilli is present in the Template:Bangladesh liberation, besides, you can not refer to a campaign box to prove your point, the editor who created the campaign box might have missed the article! Battle of Hilli started on November 22 while the Indo-Pak war started on 3rd December, hence it's more appropriate to call it a part of Bangladesh Liberation War which started on 26th March. And I would request you to have a comprehensive read on WP:AGF before you post in a talk page, your comments like do NOT pose authority! is a breach of the behavioral policies of wikipedia. Lastly, I'm reverting your edit in that article and don't revert mine until we come to a consensus here. Thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 13:48, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a breach of etiquette, you should cooperate instead of reverting others' edits, you ought to have waited for my reply here, so that we might reach a consensus here, but you reverted my edits, and that show your WP:AGF experience, besides the editor who created the Bangladesh template, may have added the article mistakenly! I cannot refer to a campaign box, and you can also not refer to a template. Anyway, I agree with your point of Starting dates of the battle! The Battle of Hilli no doubt started as a part of the Bangladesh Liberation War, but when after India invaded East Pakistan, then the battle became a part of Indo-Pakistani fight too! I agree with your point that it was a part of BLW, and my point is that it also became part of Indo-Pak war of 1971 after 3rd December when India joined the War, so I have also added info about that along with the BLW. Hope the conflict gets solved, Regards! Faizan (talk) 14:24, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, discussing the matter before making a revert is not compulsory unless the revert breaches the WP:3RR policy. Besides, I have also given explanations in the edit summaries as well as in this talk page! Anyways, I guess we have reached a consensus, it was part of both the wars. Thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 15:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's it! Thank you too! Faizan (talk) 15:52, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hello

hi. . . . . i had no intention to make disruptive edits, however, wikipedia does not allow us to use copious amounts of non-referenced text (these can be removed at any time) and also weasel words and peacock terms. all the articles you reverted included too much of such content, but it's not allowed to use advertising type language on wikipedia. we wouldn't find things like that in an normal encyclopedia. i hope if you go back and look at my edits, then you will understand what i was trying to do. believe me, you'll get it when you read what things i deleted! since you are highly experienced in these matters, i will also be grateful if you can also give this matter some attention and help fix these articles. Ricose (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zayeem! Regarding some revert-disputes over the following articles:

Articles must be properly sourced, and the use {{citation needed}} (or similar tags) is a perfectly acceptable way of pointing out a lack of sourcing (and thus lack of verifiability). Please refrain from removing the tags without providing an appropriate citation from a reliable (preferably independent) published source; Original research cannot be accepted as basis for content. Additionally, any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed.

We must also observe a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view at all times, thus puffery should indeed be removed or reworded.

There is even a specific content policy which applies to biographies of living persons, kind of is like a stricter version of the others I linked to; you may be interested in it too if you are not aware of it.

You are probably already aware of all this, but i just thought it best to point it out just in case. Please respond, rather than revert-warring with Ricose. Regards, benzband (talk) 19:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hello my friend, no worry about the late reply. in reply to the message you left on my talk page, i do realise that other editors have also worked on the articles in the past, but wikipedia also has a few policies according to which all wikipedia articles must be written, such as

1. using reliable and neutral sources - for example, facebook pages, fan blogs or the personal website of the subjects are not considered reliable sources for wikipedia as anybody can set those up and claim to great, also the sources must be such that they can be verified by any other wikipedia editor in the world. material that comes from non-reliable sources or unreferenced content can be deleted at any time by anybody.

2. keeping a neutral point of view - this means just stating verifiable facts, also not adding biased adjectives like 'wonderful, awesome, disgusting, stupid', and not using superlatives like 'the best band of the country' or 'supreme virtuoso' unless they come from a world-class reliable source like say, newsweek magazine. this is why even worldwide famous artists such as top singers from the USA are described simply by their profession on wikipedia rather than including adjectives like 'heart throb singer', 'most popular singer of the world' or 'wonderfully fantastic'. please check the page of any famous international celebrity if you have any doubts. . . .as i read somewhere in the wiki guidelines, if someone is truly outstanding then the facts will speak for themselves.

3. sufficient notability - if a band has no albums (or just one or two independently released albums which have achieved relatively minor or little success) and just one or two concert reviews and a facebook page to prove their existence, they are not really notable enough to have their own wikipedia page.

4. sufficient number of sources - if a wikipedia article has just a single or very few sources, that is not considered sufficient by wikipedia standards. for example, the article about rock music in Bangladesh has only about five or six sources, but such a vast topic cannot be based on such few sources.

there are many more rules that need to be observed for wikipedia articles.

thus, i have tried to fully retain as much of the work of the past editors as possible while also respecting the rules of wikipedia. the edits i have made have no relationship with how many editors worked on the articles in the past, the edits is just to ensure that the material published here is meeting wikipedia guidelines.

here are a few pages you could read to learn more, in a ddition to the ones benzband (talk has listed above. . . . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:W2W http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:V http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Masking_the_lack_of_notability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_one_cares_about_your_garage_band

so let's try to respect wikipedia policies! Here's to a clean wikipedia! Ricose (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with removing the peacock and weasell words but as I've pointed before you are removing more contents than you should (may be mistakenly but still), and in this process you are even removing some reliable sources as you did here! I'm a bit busy in real life so can't fix those articles soon. I'd request you to recheck your edits and add the related maintainance templates. I'm reverting few of your edits with some additional edits of mine to fix it. Thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 10:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kmzayeem. You have new messages at Benzband's talk page.
Message added 18:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

benzband (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your kind response needed

Hello, this is another mate on the English Wikipedia. I've found your contributions to the articles created by User:BengaliHindu and i'd appreciated your comments on those articles. I'm requesting your comments as i feel some false accusation are being made without reliable sources in those articles. Specially, i found this article 2013 Canning riots with lots of bias. May be i'm wrong but it may also possible that such articles were created per Islamophobia. I'd deeply appreciate your comments. Best Regards, Mrwikidor ←track 16:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've gone through the article, though it doesn't seem to deserve a deletion, but in few cases I found some original research. Besides, You need to specify the biased contents that are not supported by the references. Thanks --Zayeem ^(talk) 19:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i too now don't want a deletion rather major copy-edits as there are huge bias and exaggeration of the even. And, i believe there are a no. Hindu extremists involved behind a conspiracy to defame particularly Islam which is clear from the tone of their article. I wonder why you didn't raise the Bangladesh related bias edits to Bangladesh noticeboards or users who are knowledgeable in Bangladesh history. Mrwikidor ←track 19:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did raise the issue but the noticeboard of WP:BANGLADESH is not much active, hence I didn't get any assistance from the editors. Appreciate your concern about the issue but do everything keeping the wikipedia policies in mind. If you need any help please do let me know. Thanks --Zayeem ^(talk) 14:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit frustrated by the goons of RSS of India. But, i'll ask for your views and help brother and have a bright future. -- Mrwikidor ←track 18:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Binod Bihari Chowdhury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ayub Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adheko Ghume

The article Adheko Ghume has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since Oct 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shyamsunder (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arnob & Friends Live

The article Arnob & Friends Live has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since long

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shyamsunder (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dainik Sambad and more

Please try to find references before you prod an article. As an example, Dainik Sambad is one of the largest circulated daily in that state; and has references that can be searched with a little bit of effort. Thanks.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did google it before PRODing it and as it may seen to anybody, nothing can be found in that search that could assert the notability of the newspaper, even the references that you provided have only trivial/incidental coverage about the subject and don't really assert the notability as required per WP:GNG or WP:NMEDIA. Please, first take a look at the policies before accusing others. Thanks --Zayeem ^(talk) 15:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the website reference is from the state government's directorate of information and cultural affair, and it lists this particular newspaper among the top four in the state. That is sufficient in the geographic areas where online references are hard to come by. The newspaper meets criteria 2 and 5 of WP:NMEDIA, like many other regional newspapers in Indian subcontinent.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	You truly deserve more than this but this is what i can give here. Anyways, please continue the good work and my best wishes are always with you. Cheers!! Mrwikidor ←track 19:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you --Zayeem ^(talk) 11:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Binod Bihari Chowdhury

On 19 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Binod Bihari Chowdhury, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Binod Bihari Chowdhury, who died on 10 April 2013 at the age of 102, was the last surviving anti-British colonial revolutionary in South Asia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Binod Bihari Chowdhury. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 08:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

DYK nomination of Bangladesh Games

Hello! Your submission of Bangladesh Games at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:25, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eamin Haque

I rv your name change/article move. Please do not unilaterally move pages without notifying other editors and seeking consensus.~~especially when the article is in the process of AFD~~ Quis separabit? 17:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did notify you on your talk page and showed the reasons here but you didn't care to respond, so I went for the move. Besides, there was no concern about the move from the article creator as well, before you moved the page to Bobby (Bangladeshi actress). --Zayeem ^(talk) 09:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not respond further as it appeared from your own words that we had reached an agreement:

Hi! I saw you moved the page from Eamin Haque Bobby, though the actress is popularly known as Bobby but I guess the previous title was more accurate since you can get more sources through searching with that name. Thanks --Zayeem ^(talk) 12:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Quis separabit? 16:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And it appeared from your silence that you had no problem with my reasoning about the title. Anyways, I've notified the article creator about the issue here and hoping to reach a consensus. --Zayeem ^(talk) 17:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bangladesh Games

On 8 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bangladesh Games, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bangladesh Games, the national multi-sport event of Bangladesh, was previously known as Bangladesh Olympic Championships? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bangladesh Games. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Care in editing

Please be careful when editing Jaaz Multimedia; twice now you have overwritten other edits. AllyD (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, apologies! I was actually trying to add some references, will be careful next time! Thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 20:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A nice edit, Zayeem! Faizan -Let's talk! 05:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I had made the same edit in that page earlier, but you reverted it! --Zayeem ^(talk) 05:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

Thank you, Mr. Zayeem, the hardworking Wikipedian for your Barnstar! I'll put it on my user page

Ahnaaf (talk) 16:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) --Zayeem ^(talk) 18:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a advice, keep your barnstars and other awards in your user page. It will be better than keeping it on your talk page! — Ahnaaf (talk) 06:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm also thinking of keeping the barnstars on the userpage, but actually I'm currently working on the userpage design, once I'm done with it, I'll keep the barnstars there. Thanks for the advice! :) --Zayeem ^(talk) 08:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Hilli

Hello dude! Would like to discuss it? Battle of Hilli ended even before Bangladesh was created, therefore a non-existent country cannot be added in the infobox. Faizan -Let's talk! 14:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Well, the independence of Bangladesh was declared on 26 March 1971, so its fair to use that term. I also went by the main article, where the belligerent is stated as Bangladesh, I wasn't a Wikipedian that time but I guess there had been extensive discussion about this issue in the past and the involved wikipedians have agreed to use the term Bangladesh as it is used in all other articles related to this. Thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 15:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there is a heck of difference between creation and declaration. Just citing a doubtful imaginative discussion for deciding Belligerent is not enough. I think we should keep "East Pakistan" as opponent there. Likewise, the wars which took place after the creation of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh already have Bangladesh as a belligerent instead of East Pakistan, and that's it! I appreciate your edits regarding Bangladesh and your applause to the editors active with Wiki Project Bangladesh, by giving them awards. Keep up the great work, Hope that the coverage of such articles increases more, I will always be here for further help! Faizan -Let's talk! 16:03, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Faizan for your appreciation regarding my edits, but I still can't agree with you. My main reasoning was the declaration of independence of the land, which was overwhelmingly supported by the people. Further, the provisional government was formed on 17 April, 1971. As you can see, all the three criteria to be recognized as a sovereign state was already fulfilled before the battle started, so I think its better to have Bangladesh instead of East Pakistan as the belligerent.--Zayeem ^(talk) 18:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just putting it to bed for a few. Faizan -Let's talk! 05:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Bangladeshi films in 2006 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Purnima

List of Bangladeshi films in 2009 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ebadat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Fai zan 10:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for encouraging me. :) --Rossi101 (talk) 09:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Rossi101[reply]

You're welcome! :) --Zayeem ^(talk) 12:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jazz Multimedia

It seems Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaaz Multimedia should be closed as "keep". Anyway, I was reading that Bangladeshi poets category post. A proposal is budding at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#2013_Bangladesh_India_WikiProjects_dispute_resolution. --Tito Dutta (contact) 04:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

Can you show me the discussion where you get the consensus that Michael was a Bangladeshi and any secondary reliable source which backs it. You cannot add it because you feel that it will help people searching. Wikipedia maintains NPOV and I think you are not following it. You reverted the edits of me and BengaliHindu, by the way both are senior wikipedians to you. I will request you to maintain NPOV. You are free to promote Bangladesh in wikipedia but please do not add false info. Solomon7968 (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here. --Zayeem ^(talk) 13:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure adding a category does not make it a fact but you cannot with these justify your inclusion of J. C. Bose in Scientists from Bangladesh template. Again I see that you have made a quite a good number of contributions in Bangladesh related article. I appreciate that. But in this case you are just wasting your time by adding these categories. I myself try to make contributions in some obscure areas where not much people are interested. Plesae do not escalate it. Try some third party neutral dispute solution. Thanks and happy editing. Solomon7968 (talk) 13:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't provided any valid explanation! BTW, I guess we should keep this discussion on a single page (WP:INB) to make it easier for others to go through the discussion.--Zayeem ^(talk) 13:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Look there is already a category Bengali poets so adding Bangladeshi poet will mean he was born in 1971. Now if you think neutrally does not it seems wrong to you? Sure you are from Bangladesh but this is not the way to present Bangladesh in wikipedia. Solomon7968 (talk) 13:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I have pointed there, you will find many similar examples from the categories of other countries as well, including India. Let me show you an example of Martha Wadsworth Brewster, she died in 1757 but still have category Category:American women poets. We can go with the conventional terms in this case. --Zayeem ^(talk) 14:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then you can argue this on the talk page of Martha Wadsworth Brewster. I do not want to stretch this matter but your way seems very wrong to me. I added People from Jessore to show he was born in the geographical area of Bangladesh. But he is in no way a Bangladeshi? Solomon7968 (talk) 14:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a bias in wikipedia that American means only USA but actually it is a continent. We can change this via a constructive way of creating articles on other topics. But repeating mistakes is not a solution. I do not know the nationality of Martha Wadsworth Brewster but I am sure that Michael is not mentioned as a Bangladeshi in any "reliable secondary sources". Solomon7968 (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said before one would not become Bangladeshi only by having a category, however feel free to revert if anyone adds Bangladeshi as the nationality in the infobox or refer him as a Bangladeshi in the text. Besides, there must be 100s of articles with these type of categories and its definitely not possible by a human to discuss in each and every article talk page. In addition, if someone removes the Indian categories from similar articles based on your rationales, many will rant on the issue in the same fashion. Hence, its better to go with the conventional terms. --Zayeem ^(talk) 14:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is absurd that even after knowing he is not a Bangladeshi, you are keen to add the category. Please wait till any third man interrupts in the noticeboard talk page. Solomon7968 (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sadakhata

Could you check if this article Sadakhata passes WP:GNG and add few sources if possible? --Tito Dutta (contact) 18:22, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a look, thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 07:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Had a thorough search about the software, found some passing mentions [1], [2], [3]. The article doesn't pass WP:GNG for sure and don't think it passes WP:NSOFTWARE or WP:NWEB either. --Zayeem ^(talk) 11:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you! Do you know how to add Avro or any other phonetic in webpage? Google's code is not working here. --Tito Dutta (contact) 12:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have no idea! You may get your answer here. --Zayeem ^(talk) 13:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Hello, thanks for the note. I already know about the blog thing very well, I actually just wanted to use the photo as a reference rather than the blog, hence I used the photo link as a reference rather than the blog itself! Ricose (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you wanted but the photo doesn't prove that they are married in any sense. Moreover, you could have verified it through the existing references which you removed with that edit.--Zayeem ^(talk) 14:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kmzayeem. You have new messages at Faizan's talk page.
Message added 13:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fai zan 13:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mukti Bahini

On your proposal, I have fixed and restored most of the info, I removed earlier. Thanks Fai zan 14:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fauna

You have to remove all Banglapedia references as they are not acceptable for DYK and fir alt govt. or IUCN sources.--Nvvchar. 20:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't know that! I'll try to add some other sources. Thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 12:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why Banglapedia can not be used as source? --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email)

When I used text from other wikipedia sources in the past it was not accepted. Even when we use translated versions from other Wikipedia like German or French or Spanish, the original sources have to be cited. That is the reason why I did not formally review the article though I did c/e and added an img but suggested to Kmzayeem to find the original sources.--Nvvchar. 13:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But, why Banglapedia can not be used as source? --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 13:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can pose it on the Wikipedia DYK help page since I have based it on my past experience. --Nvvchar. 13:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to Wikipedia sources or Encyclopedias in general? Banglapedia is not affiliated with Wikimedia foundation, however it is regarded as the national encyclopedia of Bangladesh. --Zayeem ^(talk) 13:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, that seems to be the confusion here! Banglapedia is Bangladesh's first and best official encyclopedia. It has nothing to do with Wikimedia. --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 14:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it is not affiliated to Wikipedia then it should be OK.--Nvvchar. 15:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Thank you! --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 15:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Give a reference link to the fish img, which is the national aqufauna of Bangladesh so that it could be used as a part of an Alt hook.--Nvvchar. 15:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mukti Bahini

Good work at Mukti Bahini article. In the beginning of this year multiple Bangladesh related articles were facing serious copyvio problem. I requested few WP Bangladesh editors, did not get much response and then rewrote three—four articles Pritilata Waddedar, Surya Sen, this Mukti Bahini etc. Though the work at Mukti Bahini remained vastly incomplete!

I hope to take Pritilata Waddedar to FA someday! Do you have the book Pritilata (in Bengali). Prometheus er pothe. 2008? I searched in the nearest book stalls in Kolkata, but did not find! The article might be an excellent FA! --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 12:43, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can't take the credits for Mukti Bahini, I just did some c/e and other minor stuffs. Some other users like Fremesm, Onimesh, Darkness Shines did the main works. Though it was always in my watchlist. It would be really great to have Pritilata Waddedar as a featured article. Haven't got that book, will search it! Thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 13:41, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kmzayeem. You have new messages at ArmanJ's talk page.
Message added 12:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fai zan 12:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fauna of Bangladesh

On 3 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fauna of Bangladesh, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that fauna of Bangladesh includes Trigona fuscobaltiata, the only species of stingless bees found in the country? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fauna of Bangladesh. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good work Zayeem. I hope that I could also contribute with you after exams, will coperate? Fai zan 08:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm really willing to co-operate but you also need to free yourself from those unnecessary disputes. Good luck for your exams. --Zayeem ^(talk) 15:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed dude. I don't know why we take these things serious, we are all here to build an encyclopedia, conflicts do happen but they should be dealt with patience and facts. I just wanted to try an RM, you may get consensus there, and that's it. Anyway, after my exams, I will try to manage Wiki Project Bangladesh To Do list. Thanking you again. Fai zan 15:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.--Zayeem ^(talk) 15:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a pleasure In Sha Allah

Fai zan 15:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'71 genocide

Hi Zayeem,

Can you give your comments here on the title change. I can't believe we're still having to go on about this!--ArmanJ (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given. Don't worry, we'll reach a consensus very soon. --Zayeem ^(talk) 13:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	"The Tireless Contributor Barnstar is awarded to especially tireless editors who contribute an especially large body of work without sacrificing quality." Awarded to you for your industrious contributions on wide range of articles, and for encouraging editors. You really deserve this. Thanks Zayeem! Fai zan 17:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kmzayeem. You have new messages at Talk:Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh.
Message added 14:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fai zan 14:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zayeem, please man adopt a mature way at the talk. I will try to address the issues you have cited. Fai zan 07:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really fed up of this, now we should change the course. Please. At least no I expect something other from you. Fai zan 07:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done everything according to the policy, if anyone needs to change, it's only YOU. You are continuously removing the POV, Disputed tags from the article before reaching a consensus. This is not constructive. --Zayeem ^(talk) 07:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I regret, I am improving the article . Fai zan 08:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zayeem, I have difficulty in finding references. You have a wide experience of Bangladesh-related articles. Can help with the refs? Maybe from other articles? Fai zan 08:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want me to do by this? Everything in order Zayeem? What the fuck I will extract for Bihari immigration from India? At that time, who had given attention or coverage to them? Please make valid arguments. There is nothing special for Indian immigrating Biharis, what should I do? I have included the general info which I found for Northern Muslims including Biharis. At that time, you know these organizations of media were not active, and it's common sense that Biharis were not VIPs, every community had equal available general coverage. I expect a good reply. This is not a war, I accept your stance in other points, but in this, you should understand. Fai zan 14:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had made valid arguments, you didn't mention anything about what prompted them to leave Bihar in the first place. For example, Bengalis and Punjabis have suffered communal violence and riots during the partition period, which prompted them to leave their native place (West Bengal-East Bengal, West Punjab-East Punjab). Sure, Biharis also had similar fate. You need to show them up. You can search the google books if media coverage is not much available.--Zayeem ^(talk) 14:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, the punjabis and bengalis, may their soul rest in peace, they were made targets of riots because of their migration. They migrated for the cause of "Two nation theory". Fai zan 14:33, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Zayeem. Hope to extend coperation in future. Fai zan 15:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

+1 at Template:Did you know nominations/Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh. Fai zan 14:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kmzayeem reported by User:Faizan (Result: ). Thank you. Fai zan 14:43, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War

You have violated 3RR on this article, self revert now. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any violation within 24 hours. Fai zan 15:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DS, bring in some neutral editor to say that I had really violated the 3RR then I would self revert, I've re-added the tag which you removed without reaching a consensus.--Zayeem ^(talk) 15:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can get your neutral assessment at ANEW. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I have withdrawn the ANEW report as the situation is resolved. Next time try and show some trust. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP India discussion invitation

Namaste, Kmzayeem. You have got at least one new message at the Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Please continue the discussion there!
Message added by Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 19:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.[reply]

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Kmzayeem. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 20:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 20:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For those Google Books. Really so sad that they were even killed in Bihar. Not allowed to live in East Pakistan too, and then they are even suffering in the modern day West Pakistan.

Fai zan 10:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Head over to my sandbox, and you can have a glance at the expansion. ANy fixes, if required, do them, I will include the text shortly in the article. regarding communal violence during partition in Bihar. Fai zan 17:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added the info in the article. Thanks for the AfD. Fai zan 18:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Bihari sentiment

You cannot seriously believe that one tabloid newspaper based on the story of ONE man out of a population of MILLIONS is accurate ? there 22 million Muhajirs in Pakistan how can one man represent them all ? this is pure Original research and synthesis based on a particularly blatant POV agenda of yours you have also mislead people on other claims how can you continue to argue that this rediff source is gods word on biharis in pakistan? how can pakistan have a muhajir as a president? I suggest you leave whatever animosity you have due to the events of 1971 and stop spreading misinformation. 86.151.237.220 (talk) 10:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Kmzayeem. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 13:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sitush's suggestion! Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 13:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fai zan 18:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And this is personal attack of abusing an editor for "biased comments". Keep your accusations back, lest I report you at the ANI. Which one is personal attack? --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 19:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I asked him to take that comment back. That can never be termed as such. Fai zan 19:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But, which one was personal attack and how which tempted you to post a cookie-cutter warning? --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 19:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing other editor of biased editing is not enough? Fai zan 19:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is not that the point of discussion— that article content is redundant and does not follow NPOV? :) It was not a very serious personal attack. Just half an ago someone reported a personal attack, see this. --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 19:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lies

"The reason of the AfD is that the contents of the article Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh largely overlaps with Stranded Pakistanis and is also a POV fork" and this is not canvassing ?86.151.237.220 (talk) 16:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 16:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This IP surely needs to be reported. He is also removing the contents from Stranded Pakistanis.--Zayeem ^(talk) 17:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go to ANI. Report this edit too. --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 17:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead be my guest Zayeem you have used everything else to muddy the waters and failed miserable maybe this time it will work? as for your spokesperson Ditto mind your own business please. 86.151.237.220 (talk) 17:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait hold on I only reverted you once on stranded pakistanis actually so what will your excuse be this time? that I am a pakistani propagandist out to get Bangladeshis? maybe you need to be reported for 3RR ;) 86.151.237.220 (talk) 17:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's your business actually? Helping others in edit wars? You have reverted my edits several times in Anti-Bihari sentiment, Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh and now in Stranded Pakistanis. And do you really know the meaning of WP:3RR?--Zayeem ^(talk) 17:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Faizan SPI

I recommend you enter a separate SPI against Faizan and that IP, as the case I opened will likely be closed soon, without further action. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will do it, thanks.--Zayeem ^(talk) 14:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:38, 13 June 2013 edit Gaijin42 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 20,866 edits →Faizan SPI: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:46, 13 June 2013 edit undo Kmzayeem (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 10,660 edits →Faizan SPI Next edit →
Line 454:		Line 454:

	I recommend you enter a separate SPI against Faizan and that IP, as the case I opened will likely be closed soon, without further action. [[User:Gaijin42\|Gaijin42]] ([[User talk:Gaijin42\|talk]]) 14:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)		I recommend you enter a separate SPI against Faizan and that IP, as the case I opened will likely be closed soon, without further action. [[User:Gaijin42\|Gaijin42]] ([[User talk:Gaijin42\|talk]]) 14:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
			:Okay, will do it, thanks.--[[User:Kmzayeem\|<font style="font-size:18px" color="#848482" face="Ransom">Zayeem</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Kmzayeem\|<font color="#483C32">'''''(talk)'''''</font>]]</sup> 14:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)