Proto-Turkic language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:08, 12 December 2013

The Proto-Turkic language is the hypothetical proto-language of the family of Turkic languages that predates the separation of the Turkic peoples and separation into Oghuz and Oghur branches by approximately 4500-4000 BCE.^[1]^[2]^[3] Its speakers are usually connected with the early archaeological horizon of west and central Siberia and in the region south of it.^[2]

The oldest records of a Turkic language, the Old Turkic Orkhon inscriptions of the 7th century Göktürk khaganate, already show characteristics of the Eastern branch of Turkic, and reconstruction of Proto-Turkic must rely on comparisons of Old Turkic with early sources of the Western branches, Oghuz and Kypchak, as well as the Oghur branch (Bulgar, Chuvash, Hunnic, Khazar, Turkic Avar). Since attestation of these non-Eastern languages is much more sparse, reconstruction of Proto-Turkic still rests fundamentally on East Old Turkic of the Göktürks.

Phonology

Proto-Turkic exhibited vowel harmony, a feature sometimes also ascribed to Proto-Altaic, distinguishing vowel qualities e, i, o, u vs. ë, ï, ö, ü besides a, as well as two vowel quantities.

The consonant system had a two-way contrast of stop consonants (fortis vs. lenis), k, p, t vs. g, b, d, with verb-initial b- becoming h- still in Proto-Turkic. There was also an affricate consonant, č; at least one sibilant s; and sonorants m, n, ń, ŋ, r, ŕ, l, ĺ with a full series of nasal consonants.

The sounds denoted by ń, ĺ, ŕ refer to palatalized sounds and have been claimed by Altaicists to be direct inheritances from Proto-Altaic. The last two can be reconstructed with the aid of the Oghur languages, which show /r, l/ for *ŕ, *ĺ, while Common Turkic has *z, *š. Oghuric is thus sometimes referred to as Lir-Turkic and Common Turkic as Shaz-Turkic. An alternate analysis reconstructs Proto-Turkic *z, *š, holding that Common Turkic remains closer to the original state of affairs. The glottochronological reconstruction based on analysis of isoglosses and Sinicisms points to the timing of the r/z split at around 56 BCE–48 CE, associated with "the historical situation that can be seen in the history of the Huns' division onto the Northern and Southern: the first separation and withdrawal of the Northern Huns to the west has occurred, as was stated above, in 56 BC,...the second split of the (Eastern) Huns into the northern and southern groups happened in 48 AD" from which time the Northern branch steadily migrated from western Mongolia through southern Xinjiang into the north's Dzungaria and then finally into Kazakhstan's Zhetysu until the 5th century.^[4]

Grammar

Nouns

Pronouns

Numbers ^[5]

1	*bir
2	*ėki
3	*üč
4	*tȫrt
5	*bēš
6	*altï
7	*yeti
8	*sekir
9	*tokur
10	*on
20	*yėgirmi
30	*otuz
40	*kïrk
50	*elig
60	*altmïš
70	*yetmïš
80	*sekizon
90	*tokuzon
100	jür, yüz

Notes

^
Barış Kabak: Acquiring phonology is not acquiring inventories but contrasts. Turkic migrations and primary long vowels, A brief sketch of the history of Turkic, p. 353.
- Quote: »Turkic languages are the westernmost branch of the Altaic family, which is hypothesized to have come into existence around 4500–4000 BC.«
^ ^a ^b
Róna-Tas, András. “The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question.” In: The Turkic Languages, edited by Lars Johanson and Éva Csató, pp. 67-80. London: Taylor & Francis, Inc., 1998. ISBN 0-415-08200-5.
- Quote: »In the region concerning us here, the Neolithic Period started at about 4500-4000 BC. If Proto-Turkic reflects a language of the first period, it began around this time. If there was an earlier proto-language, e.g. a language in the sense of a reconstructed Proto-Altaic, Proto-Turkic came into existence only after its dissolution. The lower limit of Proto-Turkic is the time of the appearance of the first direct data from existing Turkic languages, in fact after the separation of the branches of Turkic, i.e. about the middle of the first millenium BC. ... In early Ancient Turkic, from about 3000 until 500 BC, no stabilised dialects can be assumed.«
^
Erik Gren, Orientalia Suecana, vol. 49, Almquist & Wiksell Periodical Company, 2000, p.142
- Quote: »"The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question" (67-80) first defines the concept and aims of reconstructing a proto-language and gives a rough chronological limit of when Proto-Turkic may be assumed to have started, i.e. the regional beginning of the Neolithic Period, ca. 4500-4000 BC.«
^ Dybo A.V., "Chronology of Türkic languages and linguistic contacts of early Türks", Moskow, 2007, p. 770, [1] (In Russian)
^ Andras Rona-Tas, 'The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question', in L. Johanson, The Turkic Languages, Routledge Language Family Descriptions, Routledge (1998), ISBN 0-415-08200-5, pp. 67–80.

References

Gyula Décsy, The Turkic Protolanguage: A Computational Reconstruction (1998).
- Edward J. Vajda, review of Décsy (1998), Language (2000), 473-474.
Gerard Clauson, Etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish, Oxford, Clarendon Press (1972).
Vilhel Gronbech, Preliminary Studies in Turkic Historical Phonology (Uralic & Altaic), RoutledgeCurzon (1997), ISBN 0-7007-0935-5.
Andras Rona-Tas, 'The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question', in L. Johanson, The Turkic Languages, Routledge Language Family Descriptions, Routledge (1998), ISBN 0-415-08200-5, pp. 67–80.

[1] Barış Kabak: Acquiring phonology is not acquiring inventories but contrasts. Turkic migrations and primary long vowels, A brief sketch of the history of Turkic, p. 353.
Quote: »Turkic languages are the westernmost branch of the Altaic family, which is hypothesized to have come into existence around 4500–4000 BC.«

[2] Quote: »Turkic languages are the westernmost branch of the Altaic family, which is hypothesized to have come into existence around 4500–4000 BC.«

[Johanson68-2] Róna-Tas, András. “The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question.” In: The Turkic Languages, edited by Lars Johanson and Éva Csató, pp. 67-80. London: Taylor & Francis, Inc., 1998. ISBN 0-415-08200-5.
Quote: »In the region concerning us here, the Neolithic Period started at about 4500-4000 BC. If Proto-Turkic reflects a language of the first period, it began around this time. If there was an earlier proto-language, e.g. a language in the sense of a reconstructed Proto-Altaic, Proto-Turkic came into existence only after its dissolution. The lower limit of Proto-Turkic is the time of the appearance of the first direct data from existing Turkic languages, in fact after the separation of the branches of Turkic, i.e. about the middle of the first millenium BC. ... In early Ancient Turkic, from about 3000 until 500 BC, no stabilised dialects can be assumed.«

[4] Quote: »In the region concerning us here, the Neolithic Period started at about 4500-4000 BC. If Proto-Turkic reflects a language of the first period, it began around this time. If there was an earlier proto-language, e.g. a language in the sense of a reconstructed Proto-Altaic, Proto-Turkic came into existence only after its dissolution. The lower limit of Proto-Turkic is the time of the appearance of the first direct data from existing Turkic languages, in fact after the separation of the branches of Turkic, i.e. about the middle of the first millenium BC. ... In early Ancient Turkic, from about 3000 until 500 BC, no stabilised dialects can be assumed.«

[3] Erik Gren, Orientalia Suecana, vol. 49, Almquist & Wiksell Periodical Company, 2000, p.142
Quote: »"The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question" (67-80) first defines the concept and aims of reconstructing a proto-language and gives a rough chronological limit of when Proto-Turkic may be assumed to have started, i.e. the regional beginning of the Neolithic Period, ca. 4500-4000 BC.«

[6] Quote: »"The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question" (67-80) first defines the concept and aims of reconstructing a proto-language and gives a rough chronological limit of when Proto-Turkic may be assumed to have started, i.e. the regional beginning of the Neolithic Period, ca. 4500-4000 BC.«

[4] Dybo A.V., "Chronology of Türkic languages and linguistic contacts of early Türks", Moskow, 2007, p. 770, [1] (In Russian)

[5] Andras Rona-Tas, 'The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question', in L. Johanson, The Turkic Languages, Routledge Language Family Descriptions, Routledge (1998), ISBN 0-415-08200-5, pp. 67–80.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{distinguish|Old Turkic language}}
 {{More footnotes|date=June 2011}}
-The '''Proto-Turkic language''' is the hypothetical [[Proto-language (historical linguistics)|proto-language]] of the family of [[Turkic languages]] that predates the separation of the [[Turkic peoples]] and separation into Oghuz and Oghur branches by approximately 1000 BCE.<ref name="Johanson68">[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=U1009DRu_vMC The Turkic Languages] Lars Johanson, Éva Csató. p.68. 1998. ISBN 0-415-08200-5</ref> Its speakers are usually connected with the early archaeological horizon of west and central [[Siberia]] and in the region south of it.<ref name="Johanson68"></ref>
+The '''Proto-Turkic language''' is the hypothetical [[Proto-language (historical linguistics)|proto-language]] of the family of [[Turkic languages]] that predates the separation of the [[Turkic peoples]] and separation into Oghuz and Oghur branches by approximately 4500-4000 BCE.<ref>Barış Kabak: [http://www.linguistics.uni-wuerzburg.de/fileadmin/04110230/user_upload/Kabak_CV/ACQUIRING_PHONOLOGY_IS_NOT_ACQUIRING_INVENTORIES_BUT_CONTRASTS_KABAK_CV.pdf Acquiring phonology is not acquiring inventories but contrasts]. Turkic migrations and primary long vowels, A brief sketch of the history of Turkic, p. 353.
+* Quote: '''»'''Turkic languages are the westernmost branch of the Altaic family, which is hypothesized to have come into existence around 4500–4000 BC.'''«'''</ref><ref name="Johanson68">[[Róna-Tas, András]]. “''The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question''.” In: [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=U1009DRu_vMC The Turkic Languages], edited by Lars Johanson and Éva Csató, [http://books.google.de/books?id=U1009DRu_vMC&pg=PA68&dq=Proto-Turkic+began+in+the+Neolithic+Period,+around+4500+%E2%80%93+4000+BCE.&hl=de&sa=X&ei=anKpUs3vIdPX7AakkYCADw&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Proto-Turkic%20began%20in%20the%20Neolithic%20Period%2C%20around%204500%20%E2%80%93%204000%20BCE.&f=false pp. 67-80]. London: Taylor & Francis, Inc., 1998. ISBN 0-415-08200-5.
+* Quote: '''»'''In the region concerning us here, the Neolithic Period started at about 4500-4000 BC. If Proto-Turkic reflects a language of the first period, it began around this time. If there was an earlier proto-language, e.g. a language in the sense of a reconstructed Proto-Altaic, Proto-Turkic came into existence only after its dissolution. The lower limit of Proto-Turkic is the time of the appearance of the first direct data from existing Turkic languages, in fact after the separation of the branches of Turkic, i.e. about the middle of the first millenium BC. ... In early Ancient Turkic, from about 3000 until 500 BC, no stabilised dialects can be assumed.'''«'''</ref><ref>Erik Gren, ''Orientalia Suecana'', vol. 49, Almquist & Wiksell Periodical Company, 2000, [http://books.google.de/books?id=OLUMAQAAMAAJ&q=Proto-Turkic+began+in+the+Neolithic+Period,+around+4500+%E2%80%93+4000+BCE.&dq=Proto-Turkic+began+in+the+Neolithic+Period,+around+4500+%E2%80%93+4000+BCE.&hl=de&sa=X&ei=anKpUs3vIdPX7AakkYCADw&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAQ p.142]
+* Quote: '''»'''"The Reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the Genetic Question" (67-80) first defines the concept and aims of reconstructing a proto-language and gives a rough chronological limit of when Proto-Turkic may be assumed to have started, i.e. the regional beginning of the Neolithic Period, ca. 4500-4000 BC.'''«'''</ref> Its speakers are usually connected with the early archaeological horizon of west and central [[Siberia]] and in the region south of it.<ref name="Johanson68"></ref>
 The oldest records of a Turkic language, the [[Old Turkic language|Old Turkic]] [[Orkhon inscriptions]] of the 7th century [[Göktürk]] khaganate, already show characteristics of the [[Eastern Turkic languages|Eastern branch]] of Turkic, and reconstruction of Proto-Turkic must rely on comparisons of Old Turkic with early sources of the Western branches, [[Oghuz languages|Oghuz]] and [[Kypchak languages|Kypchak]], as well as the [[Oghur languages|Oghur branch]] ([[Bulgar language|Bulgar]], [[Chuvash language|Chuvash]], [[Hunnic language|Hunnic]], [[Khazar language|Khazar]], [[Turkic Avar]]). Since attestation of these non-Eastern languages is much more sparse, reconstruction of Proto-Turkic still rests fundamentally on East Old Turkic of the Göktürks.