User talk:122.108.141.214

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (122.108.141.214) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

On Elizabeth M. Ramsey much appreciated! Chris vLS (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Cerebral palsy page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Few small adjustments

Looking good. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manual Ability Classification System has been accepted

Manual Ability Classification System, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shan Ju Lin, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

hi

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine Wikiproject!

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically requires recent secondary sources to support information; its application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
• The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, edit, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss it on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ingress (video game) page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Question

Are you saying that I need to research critics criticizing Naruto? MCMLXXXIX 03:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Because Naruto was a phenomenon, find out what academics have to say about Naruto (the character) and add it to his article. In addition to the book I mentioned, you might like to try Google Scholar and WP:LIBRARY. Hope this helps. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 03:38, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

How much of that information do you want in the article? MCMLXXXIX 03:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

If you document your searches somewhere, it will be easier to understand how you have tried to find and use academic information. Broadly, it should be the same thing that's been done for ANN, IGN, the UK Anime Network and Mania (sifting through them for relevant information on Naruto himself), but for academic journals and books. Focus on fitting the FA criteria - I'm sure you can seek further guidance at FAC or the Wikipedia library if needed. Some of the information you find might also be useful for the main Naruto article. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 03:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

What I meant was how long do you want the information, like a couple of sentences, a paragraph? MCMLXXXIX 04:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I mainly want to see evidence that "a thorough and representative survey" of the academic literature has taken place, and that what's in the article reflects that. The length of the final product depends on how much is about Naruto himself vs. his parent series. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 04:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

• Honestly, your oppose doesn't make any sense. If you want something added, why can't you be bold and add it yourself? Everyone has a contribution to Wikipedia, and you're making it seem like I have to do this all by myself because of an FA nomination. MCMLXXXIX 11:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I have added some sources to the article myself. I have also been trying to help you understand why I oppose the article being FA as it is now, without "a thorough and representative survey" of the academic literature. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 11:29, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

You mean sources that are unrelated to the problem you have with the article? MCMLXXXIX 11:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean. In addition to my concerns about comprehensiveness and scholarly literature use, I noticed that a citation that has been used in the article for some time could be better filled out to meet the citation guidelines. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 11:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

You say you had added info to the article, but not the type of info that can solve the problem you have with the article, that's what I'm trying to say. I already responded to your citation comment. Now you're also saying that you have a problem with comprehensiveness. Any more issues? MCMLXXXIX 11:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I've outlined the main ones (and some more minor issues about WP:CITE) at the FAC. If no-one has thoroughly looked through the academic literature and added relevant information, the article cannot meet the FA criterion 1c (which covers comprehensiveness). --122.108.141.214 (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

What you added to the article is what I meant by being bold. You could of done that than to blatantly oppose the FA nomination. I'm guessing you won't remove your oppose despite the fact that you have just solved your own problem, I'm not even asking you to support it. MCMLXXXIX 13:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I asked you about what sources you had consulted before I switched to an oppose. I haven't 'solved my own problem'. I have been trying to help you from the start, and have given you ample guidance on how to look for scholarly sources to add. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 13:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

So your vote isn't about the article, it's about what I have contributed? That doesn't make any sense. MCMLXXXIX 13:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

As I have said before, the article shows no evidence that anyone has thoroughly looked through the existing academic literature (e.g. the half-book, scholarly journals, School Library Journal) and added relevant information. Without "a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature", it doesn't meet the FA criteria, hence my oppose vote. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 13:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

You said earlier that you were adding academic sources, therefore, you solved your own problem. I still don't understand how your unsatisfied. How much more acedemic sources do you want? The FA criterion does not specify a limit. MCMLXXXIX 13:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I have not 'fixed my own problem', because the article shows no evidence that anyone has thoroughly looked through the existing academic literature. When the article shows evidence that anyone has thoroughly looked through the existing academic literature, the problem will be solved. Why are you focusing on me instead of trying to fix the problem? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I wanted clarification from your complaint, that's why. MCMLXXXIX 14:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at User talk:BU Rob13#Help

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:BU Rob13#Help. MCMLXXXIX 16:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48

• Please also see the FA nomination of you know what. MCMLXXXIX 16:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession

I see that you've been a while, and as such templating you would be inappropriate. But, may I ask what's up with this[1] edit? Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 02:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

The list is for people with red links (no article) - Alice Bowman has an article (is blue, not red), so I removed her. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 03:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Apologies about reverting you, then. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 03:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yoshi24517^Chat _Online 02:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

@Yoshi24517:, I was removing filled requests (with blue links that lead to articles on the person) from the page, to make it smaller. The top of the page has something saying it's too long to read, so I was helping. Thanks for your understanding.--122.108.141.214 (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, my apologies, I did not mean to revert that page. Sorry about that. Just put in the edit summary that you removed some requests. (I need to watch for the Wikipedia header more...) Yoshi24517^Chat _Online 05:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Consider registering an account

Creating an account is quick and free, doesn't require any personal information, and offers many advantages, such as:

• The ability to edit semi-protected pages
• The ability to select a username of your choice and, optionally, to use the same username when working on other Wikimedia projects
• The ability to view a list of your contributions and the use of your own personal watchlist to let you to keep track of articles that interest you
• Your own customizable user page and talk page
• The optional ability to receive e-mail messages from other users without revealing your e-mail address
• The ability to rename pages, upload images and other files, and use advanced editing tools
• The ability to customize the way Wikipedia pages appear on your monitor
• The eligibility to become an administrator (a user with special tools to help make Wikipedia run more smoothly)
• The ability to develop an identity and trusted reputation without risking being confused with someone who shares your IP address

For more information about the benefits of creating an account, click here. Or click here to create an account now.

Whether you create an account or prefer to continue editing from your IP address, we're glad you're here. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 14:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

• +1 MCMLXXXIX 17:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Naruto Uzumaki

I received the chapter that you referenced in your comment on FAC. I was able to add some information from the source. I don't think there's anything left, so the research of the topic is completed. If you think otherwise, please reply. MCMLXXXIX 22:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I read the whole thing. Nothing much about the character, as it mostly talks about the series in general. MCMLXXXIX 22:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

I fixed it. MCMLXXXIX 23:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Done. MCMLXXXIX 23:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Since I addressed your complaint at FAC, could you withdraw your vote? MCMLXXXIX 23:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Scholar information

Greetings. By any chance do your books mention the series D.Gray-man and its cast? I ask because I think it could be added to its articles. I doubt it though considering how little popular is the series worldwide. Anyway, good work in the Naruto articles. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

I found only one scholar information about the character Himura Kenshin. By any chance do you have more information about him? Anyway, keep going with the work in Naruto's articles.Tintor2 (talk) 00:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Anime isn't very popular in my country (Argentina) so there are not books that discuss the series. Anyway, thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 01:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Naruto#Pre-FAC feedback

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Naruto#Pre-FAC feedback. MCMLXXXIX 10:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gâteau nantais has been accepted

Gâteau nantais, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Naruto/archive2

I added the sources you requested. If there isn't anything else, may I ask for your support? -- 1989 14:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

The WP:FAC page doesn't say anything about IP not allowed to vote support. Yes, the article didn't really have much information. -- 1989 22:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Pinged him. If your comments are resolved, could you edit your section on the FAC page and put {{subst:rc}} at the top? It's collapses the discussion and states your problems were resolved. -- 1989 20:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetsuya Nishio has been accepted

Tetsuya Nishio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 06:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Re: Book chapters

I actually owe it to google books :D. Thanks for formating the reference. Tintor2 (talk) 12:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shark Arm case has been reverted.
Your edit here to Shark Arm case was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://vimeo.com/24453141) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:29, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Sasuke Uchiha

I finally found an interview with Sasuke's Japanese voice actor from the magazine Da Vinci. You can see the transcript here. Here are the scans. By any chance, do you Japanese? I don't know if I put the correct month or other stuff to the reference. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Another good Naruto interview

Also User:1989 I've just found this interview in the wikia where Kishimoto reveals more information about how he came up with the series. He also mentions Naruto's relationship with Jiraiya, Iruka and Sasuke and more creation about Gaara. The book is named Naruto Meigen Shū – Kizuna but I can't find the book as it would be necessary to include the pages for the FAs according to something a fellow user once told me. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Nevermind, a user from Youtube who had the book gave me the page numbers. Already added some info to Sasuke, Gaara and Jiraiya's articles.Tintor2 (talk) 16:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dark Redemption

Answer to your question at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dark Redemption. I got them from Factiva. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sutherland Shire Libraries (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sutherland Shire Libraries and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 08:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello! 122.108.141.214, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 08:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sutherland Shire Libraries has been accepted

Sutherland Shire Libraries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

petscan:1212572 - French-language anime/manga translation requests

Tai Kamiya

I've been working in the article Tai Kamiya so that it manages to pass notability. However, I've been wondering could become mid by adding big writers considering Tai is the first protagonist in the franchise. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

I tried asking there but they told me I have to provide important information to backup the fact that Tai 's article deserves to be more important to the project.Tintor2 (talk) 01:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

I see. Thanks nevertheless.Tintor2 (talk) 01:24, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

How are you doing? By any chance, do you have a book that talks about Sasuke's Kusanagi sword considering even a replica was made? Kusanagi is present in Japanese mythology like Susanoo but I can't find any information about it in google books. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

How do I go to that page? Still, I think the request must provide the source.Tintor2 (talk) 22:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Might as well call User:1989 since he is good at this.Tintor2 (talk) 23:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Found one small but still effective reference.Tintor2 (talk) 20:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello. I'm kind of stucked with Orochimaru's article. It's obvious he is based on Japanese mythology but I can't find a single book about it. Any ideas? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Tintor2:, I'm sorry to hear that you're stuck with Orochimaru's article. Luckily, it is so obviously based on the mythical Orochimaru that there's the need for a prominent disambiguation link/see also link in both articles, and so you can tie those two articles together in that way, lacking any explicit acknowledgement in an obscure interview. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 02:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

I was able to find something about his Kusanagi sword and the Yamata no Orochi but nothing about the original Orochimaru from the Japanese tales. What was the page where I could find information from other users? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint. I found one article from Japan Today but not exactly a review.Tintor2 (talk) 01:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/AustralianMarriageLawPostalSurvey/photos/a.113574786011165.1073741828.111768819525095/113628622672448/?type=3&theater, https://www.facebook.com/AustralianMarriageLawPostalSurvey/videos/10155822073124684/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

That's the official Facebook page with the official ad campaign, having trouble fixing this... --122.108.141.214 (talk) 08:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Australian constitutional crisis

Hi, this is the second occasion on which I have undone your good faith edits at 2017 Australian constitutional crisis. The article concerns members of parliament who have actual or possible dual citizenship, which does not apply to Stuart Robert. Questions as to whether he is disqualified may belong on the page Stuart Robert, as occurred with Bob Day. If court proceedings are actually commenced or otherwise raised in parliament, then Section 44 of the Constitution of Australia is likely to be appropriate. Find bruce (talk) 04:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

The article concerns section 44, and Roberts case has been noted to be like that of Bob Day, with financial benefits. I don't understand why you are taking such a narrow view of who should go in the article, as section 44 covers both citizenship and financial interests. 122.108.141.214 (talk) 05:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 08:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: - I expanded the article with material from the SBS article, as I noted in the edit summary. It is not unverifiable, it is not unsourced, it is reliable. 122.108.141.214 (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cerebral Palsy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 04:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Interested in making Sasuke Uchiha FA?

As the Boruto: Naruto the Movie article is currently a GAN, I've been thinking if Sasuke Uchiha could be become a FA in the future similar to Naruto Uzumaki. That article has a lot of information about the character's creation, role in every media as well as a lot of reception with some scholar mentions. Of course, I believe it would first need a peer review to prepare well. This message is also directed at User:1989 and newcomer User:Flowerpiep (who is partly responsible for making Sarada Uchiha a GA and improving most of Mitsuki (Naruto) as well as revising the prose of Boruto: Naruto the Movie). Of course there is no need to rush considering Boruto's movie article still hasn't been reviewed. Regards and merry Christmas.Tintor2 (talk) 18:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

I tried doing all the things you wanted and left a request in the guild. By the way, why didn't you create your own account? I think it would be the best considering all the contributions you have provided to Wikipedia.Tintor2 (talk) 00:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

By the way, we could leave the entire discussion here. Just use mentions like this "Tintor2" or pings like @Tintor2:.Tintor2 (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

@Tintor2:, thanks, but I spend too much time here as it is. :) --122.108.141.214 (talk) 01:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

After a copyeditor revised the article, I requested a peer review for Sasuke Uchiha. Still, it's a busy date to edit for many people so I hope you enjoy a Merry Christmas.Tintor2 (talk) 01:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your message on my user talk page

Hi there! Just letting you know that I responded to your message on my user talk page. You can read it by clicking here. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cashless Welfare Card has been accepted

Cashless Welfare Card, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:11, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 04:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Cheers, but I don't really see the point in edit summarying when I make edits I consider minor/non-controversial. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 04:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Jytdog (talk) 00:54, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit war warning

Please be aware if that you continue attempting to suppress sourcing per WP:PSCI you are liable to be topic banned at AE. Do as you will.

Your recent editing history at Goop (company) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 03:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)