User talk:Fitmoos

Welcome

Hello, Fitmoos, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jaellee (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

June 2015

Hello, I'm Jaellee. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Arturo Vidal because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Jaellee (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

December 2016

Your recent editing history at Anthropocene shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Majora (talk) 22:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Thomas Henry Huxley

Hi, and further to the above, I see you have been reverted by a variety of editors on this article. Please do not continue to try to force your edits on to the article: they are plainly contentious. Feel free to state your point of view on the article's talk page, and it will be discussed. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jean-René de Verdun de La Crenne

Hello, Fitmoos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jean-René de Verdun de La Crenne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Sara Braun, copyvio

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

Fitmoos, traducciones directas son violaciones de copyright. Ademas, el informe no se trata de la persons (Sara Braun); se trata de la Sociedad, asi que, aun traducido sin violacion de copyvio, el texto pertenece en otro articulo. (Disculpa la falta de diacriticos en mi teclado por favor.) Fitmoos, direct translations are copyright violations. Besides, the source does not deal with the person (Sara Braun); it deals with the Sociedad, hence, even if translated without copyvio, the text belongs in a different article. (Please excuse the lack of diacritics on my keyboard.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Not is a copyright violation, beacuse the The Informe of La Comisión de Verdad Histórica y Nuevo Trato is a public document, of the chilean state, have a public domain. --Fitmoos (talk) 01:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

That is irrelevant. It would still need to be entirely quoted. And it still does not belong at Sara Braun, rather at the Sociedad article, since the source does not mention her. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

This info may help: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Not is irrelavnt, because she was the owner of the company , she was one of the contractors of the selknam hunters. She is the intelectual author of the genocide, like hitler. You are neglecting responsability of genocide. This crime is called concealment or Cloaking. Reverse the edition, now. --Fitmoos (talk) 02:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

See WP:PLAGIARISM, which discusses public domain sources (you are correct that the term copyvio does not apply if the source is indeed public domain).

Separately, regarding the content, please review what synthesis is. Unless you have sources connecting her to the genocide, the text is not relevant to her article. Re: Hitler, it is not I who wants anything, and please take care not to accuse Wikipedia editors of crimes. Wikipedia has sourcing and other policies on no original research. When you want to add text to an article, you need to comply with policies. It is up to the person seeking to add the content to justify the reason. You have a source that discusses Sociedad Explotadora de Tierra del Fuego and never mentions Sara Braun. Having viewed all of the sources at that article, there are none that connect her to the genocide. (There are plenty that connect Hitler to the Holocaust, obviously.)

Also, when adding content to a Good article, please see WP:OWN#Good articles and take greater care that your addition is up to standard, and discuss on talk. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

If you have other article suggestions, please make them at Talk:Sara Braun; we can continue there. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Noooo, because the responsability of a crime is to a natural person, never to a juridical or artificial person (its not a real person), And she was the owner, the link is direct. And the crimes are part of his biography, was part of crimes she commmited. You are going too far, only for defend a genocide. His company employed people for commit a crimes, she is a criminal, its simple. Only in a liberal bias, where the companys are a real peapole you have reason, but, he was who paid for kill, the company is only a paper, is only a mask of his real person. --Fitmoos (talk) 02:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rolf Foerster Gonzalez

Hello, Fitmoos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rolf Foerster Gonzalez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Fitmoos! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Fitmoos, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 21:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Liechtenstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swiss. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gualterio Looser

added a link pointing to Molina

Stéphen Chauvet

added a link pointing to Brest

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Patrick O'Reilly (anthropologist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Patrick O'Reilly (anthropologist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 06:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Hans Helfritz (Komponist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hans Helfritz (Komponist). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hans Helfritz. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hans Helfritz. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Fernando Vives Solar

Hi. As you've probably realised I moved your content to Fernando Vives because we already had an article about this person. Please carry on editing there if you wish. Thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

gracias, sorry for the error Fitmoos (talk) 18:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Viktor Krupa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Viktor Krupa. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Significa liberdade (talk) 00:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

the text is the half part pure references. Fitmoos (talk) 21:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Annh07 (talk) 09:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gualterio Looser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Molina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to William Scoresby Routledge, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 07:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Fitmoos. Thank you for your work on Louis Castex (sculptor). User:FuzzyMagma, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The article need inline citation and can be improved with some wiki- links

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

History of Easter Island

You recently added some content which has been removed as it was added to the 21st century section the one very large paragraph was all about 19th and 20th century expeditions. Please review, then split the added content into the appropriate century sections.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Easter Island Foundation—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

The moved section Easter Island Foundation in the article was found to be unrelated and contained an error to be in this place. It has been move the section to "History of Easter Island" . Is not a edition , is a move. Fitmoos (talk) 02:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

The section titled "History of Easter Island" was not deleted from Wikipedia. However, it has been moved to a different location within the article titled "History of Easter Island."

The reason for this move is that the new location, specifically the section "History of Science of Easter Island," is deemed to be more relevant and closely related to the subject matter. The history of Easter Island encompasses various aspects, including significant scientific discoveries and advancements made on the island.

By placing the section within the broader context of the history of science on Easter Island, the article provides a more comprehensive and cohesive narrative. This relocation allows readers to easily access and explore the historical development of scientific research on Easter Island alongside other significant events and factors that have shaped the island's past.

By making this adjustment, Wikipedia aims to improve the organization and accessibility of information, making it more coherent and useful for users seeking to learn about the history of Easter Island and its scientific dimensions.

Thank You for your worry and your gentle message @Philipnelson99 =). Fitmoos (talk) 02:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

@Fitmoos Sorry, for what it's worth I thin I must have accidentally warned you because I don't see that I've made any edits on the page. Feel free to remove this section from your talk page entirely. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Don't Care, Thank you for help to wikipedia better source of informatio =). Fitmoos (talk) 02:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)