User talk:Kafziel

Note: This page is sometimes semi-protected. If you are an IP editor or have a new account, it's possible you won't be able to post a message on this talk page.
Please try this talk page first. But, if it's protected, you can leave me a message at User talk:Kafziel/Unprotected. I'll respond to good faith questions/comments as soon as I can. Thanks, and sorry for the trouble.

I like to keep both sides of my discussions together, so if you leave me a message on this talk page, I will reply on this talk page. If I left a question on your talk page, please reply there; I'm watching your page so I will get back to you as soon as possible. There is no need to post talkback templates on this page. Thanks!

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup

You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) — Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 03:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Play-Doh protection

Hi Kafziel, I see that you indefinitely full protected Play-Doh after some edit warring in April. Do you think that the full protection is still needed? Would you be willing to switch to semi-protection? Mark Arsten (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done - You bet. Fully unprotected. Looks like the discussion fizzled immediately after that, so maybe the edit war died with it. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 19:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Alright, thanks! Mark Arsten (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Conjuring

Regarding The Conjuring (film), I see that you moved it to The Conjuring. However, Talk:The Conjuring does not point to the film article's talk page. (I'm not sure what article that talk page belongs to.) There is also a RM discussion at Talk:The Conjuring (film) that needs to be closed. Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 15:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Wow, that's odd. I wonder why the talk page didn't move with the article. Well, it's fixed now. I'll close the RM, too. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 20:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing it! :) Erik (talk | contribs) 13:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL-PARKS Dr. Hubert L. Eaton

Thanks for your response. I think you should reconsider including my addition to this site. The site I enclosed, www.huberteaton.com is an important link relating to the history of Forest Lawn Memorial-Parks. This site is about the esteemed founder of Forest Lawn, Dr. Hubert L. Eaton. Please open this site and read all of the contents. Please let me know what you think. This is certainly NOT spam or advertising! THANKS! DANIEL H. DISNEY (Daniel Disney (talk) 21:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)).

Well, it kind of is advertising, if you think about it - you're trying to get people to go to that website. A website that contains information that is not verified, and in which you obviously have a personal interest. I'm not saying it's untrue or anything like that, but it wouldn't be considered a reliable source, and Wikipedia's focus is to give our readers independently verifiable information here, not send them to other sites. Giving people links to other sites is what Google is for.

I hope you'll believe me when I say it's nothing personal. I love Forest Lawn. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 21:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup

Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) — Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 02:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Dr. Hubert L. Eaton/Forest Lawn pages

Dear Kafziel, Thank you for your notice! I am not an experienced contributor to Wikipedia. But, the website submitted contains much information relevant to Forest Lawn and Dr. Eaton. I am not "promoting" a website! Please re-review my submission and let me hear from you. THANK YOU! (Daniel Disney (talk) 20:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC))

Dr. Eaton and Forest Lawn

Dear Kafziel: I just left you a message relating to Dr. Eaton and Forest Lawn. This is not my website but another member of my family who worked with Dr. Eaton for many, many years. Just wanted to clarify this with you.(Daniel Disney (talk) 20:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC))

Wikipedia Takes Brooklyn! Saturday September 7

Please join Wikipedia Takes Brooklyn scavenger hunt on September 7, 2013! Everyone gather at the Brooklyn Public Library to further Wikipedia's coverage of— photos and articles related to Brooklyn, its neighborhoods and the local landmarks. --EdwardsBot (talk)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Garbage Pail Kids may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[France]] and [[Belgium]], and "Die total kaputten Kids" [The Totally Broken Kids] in [[Germany]]).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Footpaths of Gibraltar

Not all rules are absolute. I used common sense and judgment, and approving a disputed nomination is prejudicial. By the way, I invite you to improve consensus on merger proposal. --George Ho (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm not saying all rules are absolute. I'm saying that no such rule even exists. You can't just make up a rule and decide you're going to apply it as you see fit. I don't know what "approving a disputed nomination is prejudicial" even means, but, as you say, not all rules are absolute. So I don't really have to care. This whole situation is really starting to look like harassment to me. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 19:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Saying in an edit summary that you are not "juvenile and petty"[1] is rather, well, you can guess what probably... Fram (talk) 13:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I thought you'd like that. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 13:42, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm glad you intended it that way :-) Fram (talk) 13:48, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for National War Dog Cemetery

Gatoclass (talk) 21:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia NYC Meetup! Saturday October 5

Please join the Wikimedia NYC Meetup on October 5, 2013! Everyone gather at Jefferson Market Library to further Wikipedia's local outreach for education, museums, libraries and planning WikiConference USA. --Pharos (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Lyman Ward Clergyman

Kafziel, thanks for moving the article into the encyclopedia. Unfortunately, I could not find it in a search. Does it take time to update or is there some other problem? I searched using lyman ward clergyman to no avail. I edited the header to distinguish the actor and the general.

Thanks for your kind thoughts and admonition to be bold. This is my first effort and I did not want to create a stub and theonesean's editorial critique helped me write a stronger article. Regarding the addition of categories. I wrote the article with a number of them based on the articles of other clergy I researched but I would appreciate any suggestions that I did not consider. Mainly, Ward is a clergyman but he was also a politician so perhaps I imagine that I can designate political categories because he was interesting as a liberal Republican. Thanks for your help, ~~Crawford Rose~~

Happy to help! I adjusted the "see also" that I think you were going for (I created a disambiguation page) and I'll take a look at the categories. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 19:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

4th Marine Expeditionary Brigade

Thank you, Marine, for taking the action that you did with the article. I have learned NEVER to submit articles to the AFC because they seem to stay there forever and molder. Perfectly good articles with citations and content are rejected routinely because someone (twit?) at AFC "just doesn't get it".

I didn't create the article, but the person who did asked for some help, so I pitched-in and reorganized the references and citations as well as some content. Now the article can live and breathe on its own merits. It still needs work, but possibly more people will work on it now that it isn't tied up in "limbo". I will "watch" the article for a while and see how it progresses; hopefully some Marine Wikipedian will take the ball and run with it...but if they don't, if this Coast Guardsman has the time, I will try to shape it up to B class standards.

Semper Fidelis and Semper Paratus;

Cuprum17,

CPO Edward W. Jones, USCGR (ret)
US Army Vietnam, 1966-1968
US Coast Guard Reserve, 1989-2007
Cuprum17 (talk) 19:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Good to meet you! Glad I could help. The AFC backlog is ridiculous, so I'm moving them into the article space to let them sink or swim. Crazy how many perfectly fine articles are just sitting there, forgotten. They've done a great job of fooling everyone into thinking they have some kind of authority, when it's really just another wikiproject. So some bureaucrats are less than pleased with me for ignoring all their procedural stuff, but I'm a firm believer that our first job should always be writing the encyclopedia. Damn the torpedoes. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 22:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

why did you delete this???!???

you deleted a page that i made for a local wrestler i'm a fan of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manic%28wrestler%29

even after i posted a link to his facehook to prove he is a real person , why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrestlingfan64 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Being a real person isn't enough to justify a Wikipedia article. See our notability guidelines for more information on that. Most importantly, though, biographies of living people require reliable sources. Your article was tagged for deletion for more than 10 days with no reliable sources, so it was deleted (along with many others). It's nothing personal. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 21:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

i did?

i posted a link to his facebook to prove he was a real person , i looked up info on how to prove it's a real person and one option was link a facebook and i did that , and it was still deleted..

RE:

i did?

i posted a link to his facebook to prove he was a real person , i looked up info on how to prove it's a real person and one option was link a facebook and i did that , and it was still deleted.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrestlingfan64 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

All you have to do is click the links I provided above, to see what kind of sources are required. I can't force you to read them if you don't want to, but I will tell you right now, Facebook is not on the list. Anyone can make a Facebook page. Again - you don't just have to prove he exists, you have to prove he's important. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 12:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

TestAuditor

Hi I see you have deleted a page called TestAuditor. The reason provided is "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". However this is not the case. Is so then all the products in issue tracking system would be also promotional.

The article is covering a product that is one of these issue tracking systems and they can only be added to a list like this is there is an article.

There are real benefits from users in knowing what is available in the market. The article in the next generation of the product QCReporting. Please can you explain how the article could be seen as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" or are you ok for me to give it another try?

SamBardon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I deleted it as unambiguous advertising or promotion because it was unambiguous advertising or promotion. "Letting users know what's available in the market" is the very definition of advertising. Articles for Creation is a place to create legitimate articles, not to host spam indefinitely. If you plan to "give it another try", I suggest you read this first. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 15:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

OK, I take your point, but all articles on Wiki issue tracking system will also let user know what is in the market. Are they all advertising? Or is the TestAuditor article just letting user know there is a 'next stage' for QCReporting? Because users have a right to know the old QCReporting product has been superseded by a new one. Can you explain how it is advertising campared to other products in the issue tracking system list. If I were to create it without code or much information would that be ok to you? SamBardon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Skimlinks

Hi, thanks for reviewing my article over at Articles for creation. However, it seems that instead of giving it a submission denied template, you deleted the content altogether. Can you please reinstate it with the appropriate template so that I can build on the article and make it suitable for Wikipedia? Also, I understand from this talk page that you have a certain dislike for "procedural stuff" but this was the first article I created and seeing it deleted with no notice whatsoever was extremely unpleasant. Getting some proper feedback and a note on my talk page notifying me of the deletion as stated in the project would have been appreciated.

I've posted the same comment/request over at the project's talk page if you want to comment on there as well. Juniper4589 (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'll make you a compromise - I'll restore it, but not back into AfC. I'll put it into the article space and let it go through Articles for Deletion instead. If it passes, cool. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 15:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to do that. Why will you not restore it in AfC though? I purposely used AfC to submit it because I knew the risks involved in writing an article about a company in terms of it sounding too promotional (plus it's my first time creating an article and I really was looking forward to getting constructive feedback). I tried to make it sound as "non-advertisy" as possible - I realise you're probably very busy but would you mind re-instating it AfC and pointing out which bits I need to work on? I was aiming to emulate the tone of Mind Candy and VigLink; are those not good examples for companies of Skimlinks' size and industry? Thanks! Juniper4589 (talk) 15:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm not putting it in AfC because I don't believe articles should just be allowed to sit out there indefinitely. I'm tired of hearing about the AfC backlog, so I'm taking care of it myself. We are supposed to be writing an encyclopedia that anyone can edit; articles should be created in the article space and edited by the whole community. You are free to edit it in the article space along with everyone else. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 15:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

If it makes you feel any better, I won't be arguing the AfD nomination. I'm leaving it up to the community to decide, and you'll probably get feedback there if you want it. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 15:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I see your point, but I see the AfC more as a training ground for people like me who don't feel confident enough in their article writing skills to create a full blown article from the start. It allows us to write something in a safe environment, safe from deletion, and with the support we need to do something good. If that involves waiting a few weeks for feedback, I personally don't mind! I'm assuming it's also a form of quality control for Wikipedia, to filter as many bad articles as possible... Anyways, I guess I'll just comment on the article's deletion page from now on and wait for feedback. Juniper4589 (talk) 18:16, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm sure you don't mind waiting a few weeks, but AfC has a backlog of 2,000 articles (not to mention the ridiculous tens of thousands of expired and declined reviews) so at some point, you have to sink or swim. All of Wikipedia is a "safe environment" in terms of collaboration, and no part of it is safe from deletion. AfC is meant to be basic quality control; a way for anonymous users (who can't create new articles) to work on them and have someone else post them. It's not meant to be a training ground, or a secret spot to get articles to Featured status or something. If it's good enough to survive a speedy deletion (and, after a certain point, even if it isn't) it's time to put it out in the world. Every article on Wikipedia is a work in progress. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 18:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Damaris Richardson article

You obviously didn't read the article properly.

"He" was a she.

Twat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wunt-be-Druv (talk • contribs) 18:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Gee, ya got me there. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 18:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Please use the proper procedure for aproving drafts at AfC

You recently did a simple move of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program to Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program instead of using the AFCH script. As a result a number of processes such as automatic cleanup, placement of Categories and WikiProject templates, etc. were not done. In future please use the proper procedure, manually performing the tasks the script normally does takes a lot of unnecessary time and effort. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

No thanks. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 22:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Munjed Al Muderis article nominated for deletion

Hi Kafziel, I was just wondering why you have nominated the article I created about Munjed Al Muderis for deletion. He is a noteworthy person according to Wikipedia's guidelines and there is sufficient references used throughout the article. However, if it is a referencing issue I can add some more references as there is multiple mentions of him in the current issues of a couple of prominent Australian monthly current affairs magazines.

I look forward to hearing from you,

Cheers, Miranda

Miranda Cashin (talk) 00:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

I was also the one who moved it out of AfC and into the actual encyclopedia. If it survives AfD, it's live and here to stay, instead of languishing in limbo for months or years on end. You're welcome. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 04:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

EXNESS

Hello, Kafziel!

My name is Julia Tretyakova, I am the PR Department Head of the EXNESS company. On 21th of November you had deleted the topic about EXNESS company, which I was created. Would you be so kind, please, reestablish this article. I really don't understand why you deleted it, because we tried to correct every mistake in right way, which was given by users of Wikipedia. Our article contained only factual infromation about company and didn't contain any ads.

Please, describe in details about the reason of deleting the article and also please tell me what should I do to get approve of the article. It will be better to communicate through email. Please, write an answer on julia.tretyakova@exness.com or maria.voloshina@exness.com (PR manager).

Thank you for your attention and for understanding!

Best gerads, Julia Tretyakova EXNESS Ltd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia.tretyakova (talk • contribs) 04:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm not going to email you. The page was deleted because it was spam. If you think I'm wrong, you may want to read this. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 15:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Submission: IgnitionDeck

You deleted the page I created called 'IgnitionDeck' citing unambiguous advertising. This was after another reviewer asked for additional valid sources, which were provided.

According to WIkipedia, this applies to "Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic," which is not the case at all.

In fact: "If a subject is notable and the content can be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion."

The subject of crowdfunding, and within that subject, DIY Crowdfunding is a valid topic, and being that IgnitionDeck is the leader in that space and the product behind the Star Citizen campaign (which has been written about in spades), a page needs to exist in order to complete the story.

I'd like you to share what I can do for reconsideration, and additionally, see which passages you felt were promotional in nature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhangen (talk • contribs) 15:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

You can add all the sources you want, but if it's unambiguous advertising then it can still be deleted. You have an obvious conflict of interest here. A simple rule of thumb: If it were really notable, then don't you think someone else would write the article in due course? Do you think Kickstarter had to have an employee come in and create their article? I know how you feel but that doesn't make it okay. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 16:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia NYC Meetup- "Queens Open History Edit-a-Thon" at Queens Library! Friday December 6

Please join Queens Open History Edit-a-Thon on December 6, 2013! Everyone gather at Queens Library to further Wikipedia's local outreach for borough articles on the history and the communities. Drop-ins welcome 10am-7pm!--Pharos (talk) ~~~~~

Submission: OrderUp

Hi, I just read the note from 'IgnitionDeck,' and you did the same thing to the page I created called 'OrderUp,' deleting it citing unambiguous advertising. I disclosed that I had a conflict of interest, yes, but I don't necessarily believe that someone else would create a page on this notable topic eventually. Wikipedia editors are all busy volunteers, so why not help where I can.

I've submitted a page with a conflict of interest before, but editors worked with me to cut out any parts they felt were not neutral. Would you be open to helping me with this article so we can get it on Wikipedia? I'm happy to recreate the page so you can pinpoint which elements of the article you felt were not neutral. The article was cited extensively with significant secondary sources, so it's definitely notable. I'd look forward to your help! Socialmedia2011 (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

I see you've edited your userpage to try to minimize your status as a paid contributor. And removed your assurance that you won't be editing any articles related to Angel, which I suppose is good since you have edited the Angel article no less than a dozen times since you made that promise. If you're really interested in helping, why not edit some articles you're not being paid to edit? Why not reduce the workload on all us volunteer editors by not making us waste time helping you advertise for free?

Articles for Creation is not a free safe haven for people to post whatever they please and experiment with gaming the system. It's a temporary holding location for unregistered users to get help because they are not able to create articles on their own. People abusing that process is why there is currently a backlog of more than 40,000 declined articles, and I'm not going to help add to that. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 17:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm really not sure how you think that my talk page was edited to minimize my status as a paid contributor, as it states "I started this account so that I could help provide information for clients' pages." I also state "I will not engage in editing directly any client-related page." I have not edited Angel's page since 2011 when I was working closely with Wikipedia editors.

Since you're not interested in helping me, could you restore the article so I could at least copy it to my sandbox and find another Wikipedia editor who's willing to help me? I'm not trying to game the system or advertise for free, just trying to create an article about a notable company, my client.

Socialmedia2011 (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Nope. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 23:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BITEWikipedia:BITE

Socialmedia2011 (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

You're not a newcomer. You've been spamming Wikipedia for years. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 21:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rakeshwar Pandey‎

The article Rakeshwar Pandey‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

AfC reviews

I'm a little concerned by your recent reviews of AfC drafts. Unless I miss something, you seem to be either accepting or deleting drafts, with nothing in between, and some of your deletions seem problematic. For example, this was an A7 deletion of a page outside the mainspace; I don't think that's appropriate (also, for all the draft's other flaws, I don't think that A7 would be a valid rationale for a CEO). This draft was not eligible for G13 since it had been actively edited in October; a histmerge would probably have been a better solution. Here you speedied an article minutes after moving it into articlespace yourself. And this edit leaves me completely baffled. I don't think the methods you employ against the backlog enjoy community consensus and would ask you to reconsider. Huon (talk) 01:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

AfC is just a WikiProject. They have no special authority, and I'm not a member, so I don't follow their rules (a stance which, unlike AfC's rules, actually does have the weight of policy). I remember the Damaris one - I moved it into the main space, took a second look, found it incomprehensible, and reconsidered. Can't say I remember the rest, but I've made mistakes before and I probably will again from time to time. Doesn't mean I'm not going to keep working on articles. Until the AfC Wikiproject cleans out their backlog of forty thousand pages, I don't think I'll take their advice on how best to edit Wikipedia. For my part, I've processed hundreds of articles out of the backlog; if you want to spend your time poring over every one, knock yourself out. I'll be spending my time processing more. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 04:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I am a member of the AFC project and if you're you're to misquote and abuse the project's goodwill I'm going to have to ask you to immediately cease any activities on behalf of the AfC project or I will have to open a emergency block request to prevent you from causing damage to both the encyclopedia as a whole and to the AfC project. You've been asked by an administrator to explain yourself, and now you're being asked by a member of AfC to explain yourself. IAR does not apply in this case as you are not improving the encyclopedia with your actions Hasteur (talk) 04:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Don't use IAR as an excuse to do whatever you like. IAR is only for edits that may be against policy but is undisputedly appropriate. AfC guidelines may not be policy, but they are widely accepted and have gained consensus and you are not allowed to override it. Again, don't use IAR as an excuse, it doesn't apply here. If you refuse to stop interfering with AfC, I will open an ArbCom case against you. Darylgolden^(talk) 12:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Working on backlogs

Hello Kafziel. Concerns have been raised regarding your uncollegiate / individualistic procedures in regard to Articles for Creation. Given that there are numerous areas on Wikipedia where you can help out, and we have numerous WP:Backlogs, including over 75,000 BLP articles lacking sources, it might be diplomatic (and less stressful for yourself as well as the others concerned) to work in areas where you are not causing unrest, and where your skills would be more appreciated. As you appear to have an interest in, and some experience of promotional articles, you might consider putting your shoulder behind Category:Articles with a promotional tone. These are articles which are already live on Wikipedia, and some have been around for many years. Because they are not recently created they tend to get overlooked; yet the longer an article exists on Wikipedia the more it gets mirrored around the Internet. Some assistance on sorting that out would be appreciated. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

No thanks. Not interested in adding sources to BLPs. Interested in helping users avoid abuse at the hands of AfC, and making sure that Wikipedia remains free and open. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 18:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darylgolden^(talk) 13:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

About deleting

Hello!

Unfortunatelly I hadn't recieve the answer from you. Please, would you be so kind, pay attention to my request about the reduction the article about EXNESS company.

Thank you for understanding!

Best regards, Julia Tretyakova EXNESS Ltd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia.tretyakova (talk • contribs) 07:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC)