User talk:Favre1fan93

Wil Wheaton photo discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in the consensus subthread of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Archive.is

In the next day or so I'm going to be looking at setting up an RFC about removing archive.is from the blacklist. Werieth has fucked up Arkham Origins and the Joker articles and presumably more, I posted about 20 links he has left without an archive (and one he has outright killed) on his page and he just removes it, the guy is disruptive but that original RFC is being used to shield him. It's bull that user-added links are being removed and hopefully a new RFC can put an end to it. Just letting you know. DWB / Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review The Joker? 22:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

I did see the edits, though I didn't know how much was made worse or not. I forgot to mention to you that there is a current discussion on the Admin notice board here. And I like the new sig. I (theoretically) have more time and might give Joker a look at for ya! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

• Reference for GotG [1] DWB / Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review The Joker? 19:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll take a look at this later and add stuff to the page if I can. - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 19:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Did you see that I commented on your FLC? DWB / Are you a bad enough dude to GA Review The Joker? 19:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes. I'm getting around to it. I'm dealing with a very unnecessary and drawn out discussion at the television project. Meant to get to that and start your Joker review, but I see that has started. I'll try to expand on the reviewers notes if I can. - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 19:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Agent Carter (TV series)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work on Agent Carter (TV series) and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 1)! You are a valued member of the project! TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:07, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Triiiple. I hope to keep up this streak, now that my semester is done and I have a lot of time. I have my eyes on the One-Shots page next to finally get that into GA nom. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Update for S.H.I.E.L.D.

As I understand, you are authoritative about the MCU. Could you take a look at the page for S.H.I.E.L.D. and update it to best reflect the implications of "Beginning of the End"? Transphasic (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Seems to have enough information on that page, allowing the actual AoS pages to do the brunt of the detail work. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Person of Interest

I saw the hidden note. CBS has announced new episodes "In the fall". That's 2014. The note is no longer relevant. Unless you're trying to argue that, for example, we can't have an article about 2016 Summer Olympics because it isn't 2016 yet. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 15:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

You can give your explanation where I've reported you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 17:48, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

I've just started a discussion on the talk page, given the entry of an IP who's never been near this topic before into the fray. I didn't detail many of the reasons the assumption BB is making are problematic you did in an earlier post, so you might want to bring them over from your AN3 noticeboard post, if you're so inclined. --Drmargi (talk) 19:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@Drmargi: Well I'm at my whits end. It happened. Again. Is it too much to suspect Bugs is socking? Usually socking IPs aren't those weird number letter comobs. Anyways, I don't want to, but I'm reverting again, not only because of the change, but because we are in this discussion, per WP:STATUSQUO. - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 00:38, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't know whether it's sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry, but the two have cleared edited together on the same article at the same time, and the IP has two blocks for disruptive behavior. Let's see how long it persists. Meanwhile, Bugs is still holding his breath and talking everywhere but the talk page, which makes it all more suspicious. --Drmargi (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Agree. Plus, if you haven't seen, there are two more redlink users at ANI/3RR, who were reported for very similar edits: User:Mmddyy28 and User:Rswallis10. Somebody out of all of these seems to be socks or meats. - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 01:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

There seems to be a cluster of them; Aussie and Davejohnsan are talking about one more on Aussie's talk page. Given Bugs' history and his current petulance, I don't expect him on the talk page anytime soon. He's already attempted to deflect the responsibility for the discussion onto us, but it's been sitting there for several hours, a Bugs-free zone. Meanwhile, someone else is pouting because I called a fangirl a fangirl. Oye! --Drmargi (talk) 01:10, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Marvel CU, AoS, Agent Carter, TBBT, etc

Hi Favre1fan93,

I just wanted to stop by and leave a message. I love the shows you mostly edit on, and I'm happy to know you created most of them. I've been watching your edits for a while, and you're an inspiration. Extremely good edits on extremely good articles! I'd like to talk more, if you like? Maybe even talk about editing together, I'd love to help you out in anyway I could?

Limbsaw 18:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

The New 52 - August's variant cover theme

I just wanted to share this with you before I get a chance to throw it up on the article. I think it deserves a good laugh.

http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=52884 || Tako (bother me) || 18:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh man. Really DC editorial? You can't think of anything better? Thanks! - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 20:07, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

DuckTales composer

HI there, thanks for writing me. I have just re-added Mark Mueller to the Duck Tales Remastered page. He is the sole writer of the song, that was featured in the Disney Afternoon show (which I was a big fan of back in the day). Though Jake Kaufman did compose the tracks for the game (and the upcoming CD), he did NOT the write the song that we all know (and I love), and Mark did. It's pretty clear he has... watch the credits on the show. It's all over the internet, too. He's been credited on the Disney Records as the composer (words and music). Songwriters usually get the shaft when it's time for credits... but fans of that show know he's the writer and it's important to give credit where credit is due. I've used the reference from a legitimate music sales site which rightly gives the songwriter credit. Mark has that credit... please do not delete again as Jake Kaufman did not write the song but is taking sole credit for composing all music on the game. Thanks! Marianb102 (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

@Marianb102: Yes, but he is not credited as composing music for the game. That is entirely separate then what you are claiming. You need a source that says Mueller explicitly worked on this game, which is not the case. You can not add your own assumptions that this is true because you are "a big fan" and have "watch[ed] the credits on the show", which is not the same. I am removing the content again, because it is not correct. - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 05:05, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

MCU Good topic

Hey, I saw you left that "good topic" progress report thing, and I think you misunderstood what I meant when I was talking about initial scope. I don't think we could pick and choose what we want to include, we'd have to define the scope as one specific set of articles in order for it to go through. I was thinking something like this, with the film topic as our starting point, and the "main" topic (along with other subtopics, ie television) as an eventual goal. -Fandraltastic (talk) 18:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

So in your thinking (and based on what I was thinking), it would not include the main page, One-Shots page, tie-in comics page, or the last two in that table? - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 23:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Batman vs. Superman

I'm thinking of declining the speedy and opening up a move request instead so we can get a consensus. I do see the name in use in various different news medias as a working title. ([2], [3]) IMDb has it listed as well, although I know that this doesn't automatically mean anything. If it is an informal title, it's one that's so widely used that it's considered to be the official working title. That the studio has registered BatmanvsSupermanMovie.com and Batmanvs.Superman.com helps this along as well. I can see where you're coming from with this since it isn't the official-official announced title, but it's used predominantly enough that it should probably be debated. Even if it ends up with only 1-2 people coming in and voting for the untitled title, at least this way you can point to the discussion and say that there was an official consensus and avoid any potential attempts to do move wars. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

You can open one if you want, but it is not an official title at all. I don't even think WP:COMMONNAME would apply. Nothing official regarding the title has been released except when Goyer said it was a consideration, along with Superman vs. Batman. We can very much say in the lead "The untitled Man of Steel sequel (also known as Batman vs. Superman with fans and the media)". - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 17:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

...but as such, I have started a discussion on the article talk page to get a move going. - Favre1fan93 (talk – Comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films' FLC) 18:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you for doing that. I've checked in and the consensus seems to be fairly unanimous, so I moved it early. I figured it was inevitable, but I did want to get some sort of official consensus because I have a strong feeling that people will attempt to move it in the future. It's usually better to have something to point towards to say that there was a move opened and that it was fairly unanimous. 08:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

FYI

There's a discussion on AN concerning your signature: WP:AN#Linking to discussions in signatures. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Music of the Marvel Cinematic Universe) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Music of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Favre1fan93!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Flash link

how about a link to fictional universe? the concept may not be completely familiar to all readers of the flash article, and may expose a reader to the concept.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:19, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

My apologies. I thought that I had made a link because I had the same feelings as you. I think even better ones would be Shared universe or Fictional crossover. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For making List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films a FL! Kailash29792 (talk) 05:10, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Forever Evil

Hi.

I noticed you reversed my changes.

Please be aware that Justice League 30, Justice League of America #14 and Suicide Squad #30 all have the Forever Evil banner on them. Regardless of whether they were solicted as part or not they are bannered now and should be included.

Because if we want to split hairs a lot of the Constantine's in the Blight storyline didn't have this banner but are included as internally they say they are part of the storyline.

Cheers

The New 52

Hey, dude. Have any ideas of how to make The New 52 flow better and be less repetitive? Every month, it's basically, "In [month] [year], DC announced... It was also announced...". I'm pretty sure the article could easily be FA/GA/A once that kind of stuff is cleaned up, since it pretty much covers every aspect of the New 52 and is mostly well sourced. || Tako (bother me) || 20:58, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Why don't we take out all the info on variant covers and make that a subsection in the Production heading? After that, I think we can change the wording to include such things as "in the [month] solicits" or "[month]'s solicits revealed X". I think beyond that, we should get something in the Publication history that can better classify how the families are essentially no more (and subsequently add that to the List of publications page). Possibly something with a link to DC's site solicits that says "By [month year], DC began soliciting all of their titles as "The New 52" titles, while grouping the titles within the larger solicitation similarly to their previous families." We should probably get a peer review for it before bringing it to GA, just to see if someone on the outside would like to see some other info, or something expanded, that we haven't included. I'll gladly help with what I can. I'm just all over the place on here at the moment. Trying to finish up Forever Evil, work on Batman Eternal and The New 52: Futures End, and a bunch of work for Marvel Cinematic Universe pages. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:12, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Daredevil (TV series)

This MFD has been speedily closed, history merge performed. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm new to wikipedia, and Guardians of the Galay editing

Dear Favre, Sorry for my poor citing on The Guardians of the Galaxy movie page. The Ravagers is a DC Comic villain team, they have nothing to do with Marvel. So, may you please at least change that? Can you also tell me or give me a link so I can learned how to cite properly? Thank You - SimeonMTG

Sources: http://www.comicvine.com/ravagers/4060-58919/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravager_(comics) http://www.dccomics.com/tags/the-ravagers

I have posted a welcome template on your talk page, that has a lot of useful links to start out here on Wikipedia. However, we have a reliable source from here that states that Marvel is using the Ravager name in the film to classify the smugglers. And once again, you were trying to cite the comic book from the most recent series, which is not connected to the film. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimeonMTG (talk • contribs) 02:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Marvel One-Shots logo

I just stumbled upon this apparent logo for the One-Shots: [4]. It's legitimacy is doubtful, but do you think it is worth using on the page until an official logo is released? - adamstom97 (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Not if it's "legitimacy is doubtful".--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Actually, that is very similar to what has been used at the top of the Agent Carter and All Hail posters. Can you please provide the website url, not just the image url? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 13:27, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Here is the website url: [5]. - adamstom97 (talk) 07:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the actual link Adam. This is really close, but it is not exactly the same, so we should not add the image unless it is the accurate one. Compare your's to the ones used on Agent Carter's poster and AHTK's. I do appreciate you finding this and thinking it would work. This is the closest we've gotten to finding the logo to add. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 13:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

If you can find an extremely high-resolution (natural, not stretched) of the AHTK poster, I can extract the logo. The logo on the Agent Carter poster is too stylized to that particular film to be of any use.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

That's been the issue Triiiple. All the ones I've seen on the internet are small in size and resolution. I had tried with the Agent Carter one, but yes, it was too stylized to make it usable. I'll keep my eye out. And with none coming on Cap:TWS, we might not get another poster for a while. I had asked Tenebrae a while back, since they are in the media/journalism, to see if they could get one, but never heard back. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 13:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Metacritic's "normalized" scores

Despite Metacritic's claims, their scores are not "normalized". Please see WT:Manual of Style/Film/Archive 6#Metacritic's so-called "normalized" scores. Thanks. 75.177.156.78 (talk) 23:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

What is this in relation to? I need some context, because I don't know what you are talking about. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. I think you have added the word "normalized" to one or more film articles in describing Metacritic's scores. If not, my apologies for the intrustion. 75.177.156.78 (talk) 01:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Can't say I have done this. I work all over the place, so I may have, but nothing comes to mind, and I generally don't stick to Reception sections on film pages as my edits. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Avengers

Apologies for not linking with hyperlink back to the original page but I gather you know what this is about. Please could you direct me to te source which explicitly states that the movie will only release in 2D and IMAX as the information suggests. Kind regards and apologies again, Mythical Curse (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC).

Have you even read his revision summaries? See one. Nothing in the lead needs to be cited, as long as it is mentioned in the article itself, in this case, it is in the Avengers: Age of Ultron#Release section. The article has never said it'll be ONLY 2D and IMAX. The film will in IMAX 3D as well, that just isn't in the article. Only 2D and IMAX are cited, though. || Tako (bother me) || 00:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

We had edit conflict

Sorry, I was having an edit conflict with you (I was just about to remove and replace my original reference when you did the revert). I have actually been dormant user of Wiki, so not sure about new rules. I have removed the shop link and replaced it with something else. Please feel free to remove it if it's against wiki rules. w.tanoto-soegiri (talk) 02:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)