User talk:Lucky 6.9: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:23, 25 September 2006

I am considering a return to semi-active editing, with or without my voluntarily withdrawn adminship. Been floating around as an anon for awhile; might as well be up front about it.

FYI, I've been busy on other wiki projects and I'll likely spend most of my time moving some new articles over here.

I'm truly glad to read that! KOS | talk 16:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky, if you're back, I'm glad to see that something good is going on around here. Welcome! Antandrus (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Applause! Applause, applause, applause! Welcome back, thou grotesque sack of rhinoceros vomit. DS 17:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarbucksVentiMintMochaChipFrappuccino.jpg

A sweet and frosty (but warmly intended) toast to your return! :-) FreplySpang 17:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay! Your name comes up a lot here. I always wanted to meet you. ;) 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 01:59 (UTC)

I've been busy and just seen this. Good to see you back. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man welcome back! --Stormie 05:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, yeah, had a read of you user page, I had no idea that such wikis even existed. An Austin Powers wiki!? :-) --Stormie 06:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must be late to the party, but welcome to Wikipedia once again. Glad to see you return. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 16:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Always good to see established editors give Wikipedia another go. —this is messedrocker (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Public Access

Why are you erasing the history of public access entry I did? Should I call it History of Public Access instead? George C. Stoney the father of public access agrees with the history. I thought it was too big to put into the public access entry. Could you please explain yourself in the future? In all due respect I'm new at this and learning, and you were brief to erase what I did. I'm the grass roots founder of public access in my hometown of Evansville, IN and have made numerours additions to the public access entry, which have been acknowledged by public access managers across the country. Please don't erase what I've done, but please let me know how I can do it right if it's wrong. Thank you. DavidWJohnson 03:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jiggy128

I've reported him to AIV, already. He does need to be stopped. Ryūlóng 05:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your return

To celebrate your return Tom and Jerry: Frantic Antics. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was curious to see how long you'd been editing an saw the speedy. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gone for a while. Cheers. People get so cheerful when they find their articles deleted. I've been working on deleting the speedies and some the email is so interesting. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll chime in with a "lol" at that one. :-) KOS | talk 05:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, what's this? Radiant! recently returned, and now you too! Is there something in the water? :-) Anyway, welcome back. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - great to see you back. My only involvement with you was gliding past User talk:Binzaman and that Why only Muslims? page back in January. All the best, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 07:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome back Lucky!

Hey, good to see you back again :-) Ta bu shi da yu 12:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

username

I've blocked him. Thanks alphaChimp^(talk) 15:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

No one tells me anything :P - Glen 01:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there!

Hey! Hi there, Lucky! Bishonen | talk 01:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome back from me as well Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Welcome back, though we haven't had a lot of interaction. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Push with characters.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Push with characters.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

So do you miss...

Well you seem to really be sticking around, so maybe these comments (A B) will be of use to you. NoSeptember 22:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! WP:BN is a fairly active board these days, and was made for such things. NoSeptember 23:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey, welcome back, and premature congrats on the re-adminship!-gadfium 23:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

I have restored your adminship, per what I gather were your wishes. If I was incorrect in doing so, please let me know. Best of luck — Dan | talk 01:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol

I see you are right back into this, and I know how much stress it has caused you in the past. I don't know if you are familiar with the new Wikipedia:Proposed deletion system, which was being discussed at the time you left before and has since become policy. I it find a very convenient alternative to speedy deletion and AfD. Essentially, you put {{subst:prod|Reason for deletion}} on an article, and watchlist it. If the author doesn't come back and improve it within five days, it gets deleted automatically. The author or anyone else can legitimately remove the prod tag, but if they don't at least attempt to address the issue at the same time, then the article can be put up for AfD.-gadfium 05:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

trying to understand why you are deleting info about a new company?

Lucky, I am trying to understand why you deleted info about a new company that is founded in the Silicon Valley?

Deleted article

Can you step in and talk to this user? I warned him for creating the article Cumshit (which contained only his signature and which you deleted) and he's... um... not taking it well. He's concluded that I'm rampantly homophobic (which is hilarious for a number of reasons) and is being rather nasty about it. He might go away if we ignore it, but he keeps talking of "escalating" the situation (whatever that means). Um. Thanks? -- Merope 19:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm sure he'll see reason. *rolleyes* -- Merope 19:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay!

To all the users I've loved before... :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 02:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interactive advergaming

Hey, I wanted to let you know that this article has been recreated---again! When I saw it come up on the new pages, I knew I recognized it, but could not remember who deleted it or when---though I was certain that it was within the last 48-72 hours. Sure enough, I check the deletes log, and there it is. This is just absolute garbage. I am going to tag it as db-repost. Is that kosher, so to speak? ---Charles 04:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, is there supposed to be some good reason for the constant recreation of this article? I see no value to it, and assumed it was just a malicious vandal---but, perhaps not. As far as the talkpage format, adapt away. Thanks. ---Charles 18:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Brownlee

Don't delete articles I'm working on thanks. Wjhonson 06:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You see me actively editing, and you say hmm maybe I should ask ? Wjhonson 06:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of sock puppetry on the Center for Science in the Public Interest page

Allegations of sock puppetry have been made against some of the accounts that have edited the Center for Science in the Public Interest page. I have instigated the wiki process for handling such allegations. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/David Justin. As someone who has contributed to the CSPI page, please add your views to the Comments section. You have up to 10 days to make comments on the allegation. Nunquam Dormio 19:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Am I wasting my time?

I create a stub, go to expand it, and find that about five seconds after I created it you've deleted it. I waited a bit to see if you would leave me a message to explain why, but you didn't. Am I wasting my time? Mr WR 18:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. When deleting an article, aren't you supposed to give a reason when doing so instead of just leaving the edit summary blank? I'm trying to learn here, but it's not easy! Mr WR 18:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. But this thing was, I'd started a stub, clicked save to check the layout, went back in to expand it and it was gone already. You deleted it about half a minute after I'd started it, and didn't give any kind of chance to work on it...Mr WR 07:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Welcome Back! :)

Yepp, well remmeber me "Wiki Brah." Well after you left last year they blocked me andd Maoririder like the next day can you please unblock my old account I promise that i will be behaved obrigado.Le Wiki Brah 03:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thank you~~!!! That's great but i was wondering if i could have my old user name back, my old accoutn, you were the only one that understood us.Le Wiki Brah 03:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

so did you hear anything yet man?Le Wiki Brah 02:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi how are you doing now today?? Did you know we have no article on La Mirolda, which is the deepest cave in France. And I have been on the site a lot since you were gone, and know it a lot better and promise to behave better too. I think they kicked me off right after you left they also kicked off Maoririder too almost at the same time.Le Wiki Brah 01:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What gives????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'm trying to creat that article Knights of St. Mulumba Briaboru

Thank you

Thank You that is helpful Briaboru

Ellen Knutsen

Don't know where to write this, so I'll try here.. Why did you delete the Ellen Knutsen-article I wrote? Please get back to me... Best regards, Kentpaulsen

Lucky, this article might have been a good place to have used the {{prod}} tag.-gadfium 08:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you were right after all

hey, sorry for the mess I made earlier, the Al Assi River appeared to be a duplicate, it's the same as Orontes, very different name in English. Anyway, how can I delete it. I'll add my contribution to the main article. Sorry again Abountu 21:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it would be a good Idea to make it in a way that when one search for Al Assi River, he gets Orontes as a result...Abountu 21:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be of help!

I hope more editors will get involved in editing and building up articles on California politics.--Folksong 00:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beer Chess

Wow, that's the first time someone deleted a nonsense page WHILE I was marking it for speedy delete. Thank you sir, although I guess someone has to delete it again. Sorry! --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 02:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock The American Metaphysical Circus ASAP

I'm trying to create this page...and got held up on the album infobox because of a bad image that has now been fixed...please unblock...thank you. Tvccs 06:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt reply. Watch...this article will end up being a real doozy...lol Tvccs 06:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Fox

Ok..thanks for writing that. I apologize for the "what do you want". I dont know much about the artist myself. I started the article with some info, and created a partial discography. The aim was to hopefully "set it up" for other people to add more later. The person is "real" and is an "artist" (and i am not him). I have a couple of his CDs. Not sure if the article is still supposed to be deleted. Fuzzbuzz 06:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

haha.. I'm officially impressed :) Once again, sorry for the misunderstanding. Fuzzbuzz 06:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Netflix distribution centers deleted?

I know it's been awhile, but I went back searching for this article and finally found that it was deleted by you. I'm wondering why, as its AfD had many more votes for keep than for delete (although I understand the reasoning behind the arguments that the pro-delete crowd made). Actually, upon second look, it's difficult to tell, but maybe you weren't the one who deleted the article--maybe it was Sean Black--but your name is involved in the deletion process. Can you enlighten me on this? Thanks. cluth 06:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi :)

okk so what happened ? Can i come back now please?Le Wiki Brah 00:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what does that mean man?Le Wiki Brah 01:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From jjc104

Thanks for the tip. I was trying to fill in the gaps left by several redirects before someone got to them. Glad you noticed... which means, someone is actually reading these :-)

A question

You just deleted a page (Francisc R Cortez). I was adding a deletion template to it, but since you're an admin you were able to do that right away I guess and I got the collission notice when I submitted. I was wondering what I should do, since I'd like to get involved in the recently created pages patrolling - should I bother marking pages or will most get caught by admins before I go through that? Cat Parade 06:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable

I guess I was taken back by the quickness the article I wrote was taken down. I use wikipedia on a daily basis and this was my first time posting. I apologize for the rashness of my actions. I think I'm getting the hang of this. Thank you for the advice and I'll drop you a line if I need any help!

Diamond Packaging

You speedied this earlier, and it has just been recreated (for the second time). I was going to speedy tag it but I noticed it has been created as copyvio 3 times, so thought you might want to salt it. Cheers, Yomangani ^talk 16:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your kind aid again

Hi, Lucky 6.9! I'm not precisely sure of the protocol here, but I thought I would ask you directly since you're an admin and you've helped me before. Also, you appear to be online right now. ;) I have two issues to bring to your attention:

I have repeated vandalism/personal attacks on my talk page ([1], [2], [3]) from User:Aqua Tot. I've given the appropriate warnings, but each time eggs him on further. I would like it if someone other than myself could review his recent edits and give feedback to him as necessary, so as not to be the only user communicating with him. (I really dislike being the only Wikipedian involved in these sort of disputes.) It's typical juvenile behavior and not particularly troubling, just irritating.
I recently made the decision to remove personal attacks and other irrelevant accusations on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sexuality_of_Abraham_Lincoln, in hopes that the discussion would not degenerate. I left a message on one of the involved member's talk page to remind him of WP:NPA. He responded on my talk page here. I don't know if I need to request arbitration or what--I've never had this sort of vitriol directed at me from a registered, established user. Please tell me how to proceed.

Thanks for any help you can offer! -- Merope ^Talk/_Review 19:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For you!

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your kind assistance above and beyond the call of duty, I award you this barnstar. -- Merope 19:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help pls.

Wow, that was fast. can you check the page I made? It's Chocola the Chao. It's my first article. By the way, is this the only way to contact you in Wikipedia? Just askin'

Thanks and New Article

I have recreated the article with more information and an external link. I will add to it more. Thanks for the welcome. Perikles 22:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem

Did you delete Xelix ? You added stuff to my User talk warning about reposting deleted material :\

bizarrius

bizarrius is a real creature. only if you meet him you will understand. im not bizarrius. i just used that username just to upload info about him. my name is demetris mina thanks :)

- Ykstort

ok

well i am disamyed. Why cant you just talk them into it i preomise to be bette. And what happened to Maoridier? Can bhe come back? (Pardom the spelling i'm kinda high righ now)Le Wiki Brah 05:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also did request for comment on how i was blocked and tony Siddaway was keeping me down, can you plse second it? So at least we can get some closure? thanks man:)Le Wiki Brah 06:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My article

Hi, you deleted my article (Little Terrorist) a minute after I started writing it. I have contributed many articles and know what is encyclopedic and what is not. Kindly let me know why you deleted it so quickly. I am waiting for your reply before recreating it. For your information, its a movie that was nominated for academy awards -- Lost^(talk) 07:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Thanks for deleteing that February 2048 page, I was trying to add to the 2048 page a Prediction, but I'm too new at this. --Forbidder 17:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helo

Hey man are you bloughing me off man? I haven't hard from you in a whileLe Wiki Brah 19:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)![reply]

DavidShankbone

Not to fan the fire, but the personal attacks tonight were not an isolated incident. They have been a problem recently. See this, for example. I thought you should know. · j e r s y k o talk · 03:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky, sorry that things got out of hand last night. True, I can have a temper, but I also, as that link shows, am willing to apologize for it. Anyway, sorry. --DavidShankBone 14:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC) PS: I'm open to advice.[reply]

Hey Lucky, thanks for being cooler than I was last night. I think after I finish my Floyd Abrams series of articles I'm going to take a break. The wikistress is getting to me, that much is obvious. Your friend, Dave. --DavidShankBone 23:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

email

I receive email at fredbaud at ctelco.net Fred Bauder 12:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could use your help

Lucky, my Floyd Abrams articles have been nominated for deletion. I explain the point behind them on the deletion page, but if you think this is important information I could sure use someone backing me up. I have spent so many countless hours working on it, that if it's deleted I'll have to taken an extended vacation from contributing, because I think it is very important. I'm all for deleting useless and vanity-fuelled articles, but this man is living history, and I took it upon myself to do this (after I read the book he gave me when I went to take his photograph for Wikipedia). I am writing a grant-proposal around the project; if it's deleted, well, that would hurt me a lot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Floyd_Abrams_and_the_Pentagon_Papers_case --DavidShankBone 03:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re:Widereceiver19

Not a problem ;-) --Konstable 08:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Edinson Volquez – Not a problem! I'm the self-designated custodian of the Rangers' pitching staff, so Volquez was near the top of my to-do list. Seeing the link go from red to blue just bumped it up a little bit. Caknuck 01:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Apex Digital AD-1110W

Why delete Apex Digital AD-1110W? Can pages about individual models not exist? --Joeljkp 22:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

done

Cactus Cat Article FinishedWinn3317 01:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Polo Polo article

Hey, you deleted my Polo Polo article but he really is a famous mexican comedian.

Right, so, before I start a stub should I have a lot of information on the matter first? I just wanted an article as a placeholder, some place to start where I, or someone else, can fill it up later, I don't really understand why it has to be deleted, I thought the purpose of wikipedia is for people to expand on other people's knowledge, I really don't see the point of deleting a stub just because it's incomplete.

Thanks for the help on the Polo Polo article. Just so I'm clear on this, it's better to create no article than one with almost no content and then work on it little by little? thanks again Solid Reign 04:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stars

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your best efforts in keeping Wikipedia vanity-free... keep your finger on that delete button! :)

Danny Lilithborne 03:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helping hands are always appreciated. :) Danny Lilithborne 03:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROD

Heya Lucky, I was wondering if you ever thought about using the Proposed deletion system? I notice there's like 10-11 sections on your talk page from people following up on articles you deleted, mostly new ones. The couple I looked at weren't speedy candidates and should have probably been allowed a little time, at least for the creators to work on them. There's no hurry to delete most stubs, and Prod does a good job of weeding the wheat from the chaff, while giving new editors the time to expand their new articles.....thanks, Rx StrangeLove 04:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, busy page! Thanks for the response, Prod is a beautiful thing! Rx StrangeLove 06:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chesticles

While New Page-patrolling, I had neglected to check that it was a db-repost. Nicely caught, thank you. Bobo . 06:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky 6.9 said: Why is it that this site attracts such, well, nonsense? Guess this is what happens with open content. Thanks for the nice words. Back into the breach! :)

Thank you very much. I've just got to get back into New Pages patrolling more often, I guess. Incidentally, you just beat me to the punch again with Big kids. Thank you for your work. :D Bobo . 06:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense and such

Lucky 6.9 said: 'Tis a pleasure. Can you take a look at People for the Ethical Treatment of Insects and tell me what you think? I smell a rat.

A test I always use is to say: If the creator of an article puts "Do not delete, this is not vanity", it's probably speedyable.. :D What do you think? Regards. Bobo . 06:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky 6.9 said: It's trigger-pulling and protected-page time, pardner. One relevant Google that mentions the website. It resolves back to a do-it-yourself home page.

I'm always wary to use protected-page myself. I can't fully decide when the right time is to use it, though after once with a {{db-repost}} I figure I should think about it, right? Bobo . 06:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky 6.9 said:
You can always blow it off and if it comes back, we can protect it. I love the fact that it started in Ber-zerk-ley! Only in Northern California.

Well, absolutely. Twice should certainly be the limit in my book. I'll see you around, thank you very much for your assistance. Bobo . 06:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky 6.9 said:
I just made it go bye-bye. Apparently, it had at least three previous deletions. The guy also screwed up the existing redirect at "PETI."

At least we've prevented it from happening again. That's got to be a good move. Thank you for your work with this. Bobo . 17:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome. I rewrote the article and I'll add to it some more later on. Thanks again. GreekEconomist 07:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for the praise and the barnstar! :) Yeah I've been watching the Anarchism article. You should look at their post to Anarchism if you didn't already. I usually warn users before blocking them but that was way way over the line. Thanks again. --Woohookitty^(meow) 07:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard the term before, too...

... so it's not a neologism. It is, however, an unsourced, poorly written article that disparages sex workers. When the OR and unverifiable stuff is removed, it's just a dicdef. At best, it could warrant a brief mention in Prostitution, but only as a common slang term. I'll go add this to the talk page. -- Merope ^Talk 15:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have a great day! :) -- Merope ^Talk 15:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chemistry Articles

Thanks! I was just venting frustration at my weekend studies (biochemistry)... so it was more rage than hard work, lol. --Hurricane Angel 16:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar!

Why, thanks. :) Seems I missed that one until this morning, somehow. I'm always bad at taking compliments without saying something dumb about myself; whether that's a good habit or not, I've no idea. I've been noticing you on RC patrol a bit, myself. :) See you around. Luna Santin 16:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BAND

WP:BAND is not a reason for speedy deletion. Guaka 19:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CHR

Put dude i am making something which doesnt have problem with the policy now

Na man all good, thanks for that i uploaded in noder name ;)

Re: MKDW

Warning for vandalism? All new topics marked for speedy deletion fell under Criteria for Speedy Deletion. Please note the post.

No problem Lucky. Just trying to help out.

Bothering you again lol. I'm having a little trouble with the article Zippy (SWG). It was flagged for speedy deletion and deleted three times tonight. It came up again and I posted another speedy deletion warning on it. The creator posted a hangon but then some unknown IP removed my speedy warning. Maybe you can solve this.

Please substitute templates on user talk pages

When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 17:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 20 September, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tom Campbell (radio personality), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 18:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Callan

Man you got that fast! :) - Glen 23:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pail Callan entry

Greetings O Lucky One. The Callan biog is authentic as a google will reveal. All details correct.

Kind regards from Fleet Street

Balliol

Jasconius

Why was this deleted?

Re: Concordia College, Adelaide

Excuse me, but I was editing Concordia College, Adelaide. I work at Concordia College and am starting the Wikipedia page for it. Thankyou

Thankyou for your quick response. I agree that there are plenty of short articles on Wikipedia. However, articles must start small to begin with! Thanks

Re: Brostradamus

Thanks that really is helpful. I was afraid that you were going to be an @$$ like every admin I've ever encountered, so this is truly a first. BTW if you thought the entry was amusing maybe you should check out Brostradamus at www.myspace.com/brostadamus

Thanks again

Thanks

Thanks for dealing with that Zippy (SWG) problem.

I wasn't sure what to do about all those Indiana Jones articles. I thought about requesting to have them logged under a single series. I found out they were coming from www.indianajones.de

Jon Coffelt

Hi, you protected Jon Coffelt (probably rightly so), but now a page Jon coffelt has been created, which at first glance is about a notable person, and is not a copyvio (at least not from a Googleable source). I can't move this page to its correct capitalization, so I would like to ask you if you can see that the page either gets deleted as well (if it is a copyvio anyway), or else gets moved to Jon Coffelt. Thanks! Fram 14:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky 6.9

I dont understand why the article Jon Coffelt was deleted as I spent alot of time and energy developing this page and this is in no way a copyvio or a dump When on talks about an artist it makes more sense to me to be precise about any information and although there may be similarities in the body of work and some of the articles as back-up, this in no way minimalizes his work since it is better to consistently list things than to make ad copy. Does this make any sense I think because it is an artist bio or CV situ it makes it harder to create story for it. I also worked on an article on David Moos and for some reason it hasn't been deleted and I am still trying to edit it with source information like I did with Coffelt's work. I do know both of these people and I do think highly of them. Is there any way you would reconsider allowing the pages to stay and if so please let me work more on them if need be. Please let me know I will do the work myself. I suppose since these are my first two then I need guidance also I was sort of happy with them and they seemed to read well. Thank you,

artintegrated@aol.com

Solar shingle

Thanks! I always seem to screw up that syntax. Cheers! -- Mwanner | Talk 01:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Your msg on my talk

Think you've left this on the wrong page. I didn't post (or repost) that article, I speedied it. The edit msg was for the page creator. exolon 01:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you deleted the page I set up.

Rescuing articles

Sorry about running over your article rescuing again. I didn't notice that you were trying to work with the author on the second one until after I tagged it. Nice work. -- Gogo Dodo 06:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RonPrice

This user apparently thinks that Wikipedia is a hosting service for his literary works and commentaries about various articles, so could you please watch over him? (I'd love to do this myself, but I think this would be best suited for an admin.) Scobell302 08:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edwardwgross

Hi there; you and I stuck simultaneous warnings on this user's talk page, but you are an admin and I am as yet not. Would you like to delete my warning, which relates to the same edit as does yours?--Anthony.bradbury 23:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, that suits me.--Anthony.bradbury 23:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How The Garcia Girls Lost There Accent

Please note that book articles with sufficient context are not CSD candidates. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 02:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... considering that "there" is (sadly!) a very common misspelling of "their", I wouldn't blame the author for creating the page with a wrong title. :o) Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 02:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Sidaway

So if Tony Sidaway resigns his admin position over this latest controversy he's embroiled in, does that mean the people he's banned are eligible to come back? --GreenCommander81 05:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 452: / Line 452: @@
 :Hmm... considering that "''there''" is (sadly!) a very common misspelling of "''their''", I wouldn't blame the author for creating the page with a wrong title. :o) [[User:Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh|Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh]] 02:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
+== Tony Sidaway ==
+So if Tony Sidaway resigns his admin position over this latest controversy he's embroiled in, does that mean the people he's banned are eligible to come back? --[[User:GreenCommander81|GreenCommander81]] 05:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)