User talk:BBMatBlood

Welcome!

Hello, BBMatBlood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Time Inc.. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 20:20, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Time Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Event. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Infobox Company

Please stop adding parent companies to the type field. The type should be only the type of company. A separate field, parent, covers the parent corporation that it reports to. Any changes need to be backed by a reliable source as well. -- ferret (talk) 16:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Again, please read the template documentation at Template:Infobox company. The parent does not belong in the type field. -- ferret (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2K Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

21st Century Fox

added a link pointing to Shine

Fox Entertainment Group

added a link pointing to Division

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zelnick Media Capital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Fresh TV. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Cake Entertainment does not own Fresh TV, it only distributes most of Fresh TV's shows outside of Canada. Don't add false information like that unless you can prove it with actual announcements from either company. Creativity-II (talk) 09:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Facebook Messenger

Hi Matt, thanks for your contribution to the Facebook Messenger article. In the future, I strongly encourage you to find a reliable source to back up your additions. It's correct that Facebook Messenger is sometimes referred to as Messenger, but you didn't provide a source to back that up. I added a source that refers to the app as "messenger," and it'd be even better if we could find a source that explicitly says that Facebook Messenger is abbreviated as Messenger. Happy editing, Airplaneman ✈ 20:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duracell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marmon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Ages of companies

Hi. Please don't put the age of a company in the "founded" field of info boxes. It isn't the place for this and will only go out out of date and need corrected within a year. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm FirstDrop87. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oriental Trading Company, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FirstDrop87 (talk) 23:52, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Entertainment One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm FuriouslySerene. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rockstar Toronto without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FuriouslySerene (talk) 17:07, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Game Freak, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Milestone

Hey, thanks for trying to keep our article on Milestone Media up to date.

I wonder if you might double-check the edit that you just made. I honestly have no idea what the current state of ownership of Milestone's intellectual property is, whether it is totally owned by DC or whether there is just some sort of long-term license. However, I looked at the article that you used as a reference, and I can't find anywhere where it said that DC owns the characters, just that it would be publishing them. DC has certainly published a lot of things within their universe that were licensed rather than owned outright (Captain Marvel was licensed for a long time, there have been crossovers with various licensed characters, and for a while DC was even allowing some new creator-owned characters in their universe). Perhaps a better reference could be found?

--Nat Gertler (talk) 13:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fox Networks Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Walt Disney Company (India). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 16:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Access Industries

added a link pointing to Conglomerate

Vivendi

added a link pointing to Conglomerate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Double Take Comics

Nice work creating this one. If you have the information available, the section listing the titles could use the names of the writer and artist along with the publication date(s) and number of issues. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legendary Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Comcast

Not vandalism. See Template:Use mdy dates Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Complex (magazine)

added a link pointing to Hearst

Verizon Hearst Media Partners

added a link pointing to Hearst

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

You might want in on this

Right here. Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 20:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hey can you fix this page

Someone idiot deleted all the episodes on this page I tried it fix it but no luck here's the link for the regular show https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Regular_Show_episodes AlexS0405 (talk) 02:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BBMatBlood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ReachLocal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Sources

Instead of putting sources in edit notes, why not insert them into the article? It avoids wasting the time of other editors who review and see no source and revert you, or see that it's in the edit note and have to do it for you. -- ferret (talk) 12:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Verizon Fios request

Hi, BBMatBlood. I see you have been editing Verizon articles lately. I want to bring this request to your attention. As an employee of Verizon with a conflict of interest, I posted the edit request to streamline the Telephone section of Verizon Fios by focusing it on fiber optic service's telephone services. The edit request was reviewed and denied by another editor. As you'll see from the discussion, I have since reworked my draft of Telephone in an attempt to address the issue raised by editor Altamel. Can you review the request? I'm happy to discuss. Thanks so much, VZBob (talk) 19:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Noddy, Toyland Detective

I think you need to add Noddy, Toyland Detective in the computer-animated television series group in the DreamWorks Animation template. --2601:2C0:C280:21A0:D414:3463:F014:41C8 (talk) 05:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Activision Blizzard.

I have recently been updating the Activision Blizzard pages including it subsidiaries, which really need updating plus somethings needed to be clear and understand including former names, reincorporating, updating revenues etc. I will appreciate any help. And lastly Activision Blizzard Studios needs a logo, and a page created for Activision Blizzard Consumer Products. Note: I also updated Electronic Arts (EA), Take-Two, Ubisoft, and CD Projekt Pages. Thanks.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BBMatBlood. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rockstar Games. This is getting a bit ridiculous. Your edits have constantly been reverted on company articles for the last year due to unsourced and unverifiable changes. Start using sources in your edits or I'll block you so others don't have to waste time reverting. -- ferret (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

December apologise

I am sorry. I try do alot sourcing/citing articles but sometimes i just get tired with citation. I will try not do it again. +Thanks for the warning.

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney Digital Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twitch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AT&T Communications (2017)

The article AT&T Communications (2017) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable new subsidiary from big restructuring, perhaps WP:tooSoon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thank you. Gaioa (t,c,l) 20:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Neutral notice

A move request regarding Deadline.com / Deadline Hollywood, an article you have edited, is taking place at Talk:Deadline Hollywood#Requested move 11 March 2018. It is scheduled to end in seven days.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vrio Corp

The article Vrio Corp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Body of article is empty

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 12:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Vrio Corp moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vrio Corp, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 13:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Stop removing Marvel Entertainment

Your argument to remove Marvel Entertainment is illogical in nature. All of Disney's subsidiaries is either under Walt Disney Studios, Disney Media Networks, Walt Disney Parks, Experiences and Consumer Products or Disney Direct-to-Consumer and International. Literally any of the Disney subsidiaries are under one of those four divisions. Marvel Entertainment is the exception to the rule. You seem to not understand which Disney subsidiaries are under which Disney division. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

So despite my reason as to why Marvel Entertainment should remain in The Walt Disney Company infobox, you ignore my response and delete my contributions. If this persists then I will report you to a moderator. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 15:38, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Any further attempted changes need to be discussed first on the article talk page (Talk:The Walt Disney Company). This sort of WP:Edit war is not helpful to building the encyclopedia. Rmhermen (talk) 12:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Quiet Place Budget

The $17 million cost quote from Viacom's CEO is likely the net cost to the studio, which is Paramount. And Backish isn't the head of day to day at Paramount. Paramount itself reported the actual spend, broken down quite specifically, and it was $21 million. Please stop reverting when the infobox rules are quite clear that we list a range. Foodles42 (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Why I removed Marvel and Now Apologise.

I think it so deserve to be on the table and i apologise. The reason i omitted it was because i thought each Marvel branded entities are part of each of Disney's 4 division.

June 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Time Warner. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 23:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 16:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi. It looks like you've continued to use talk pages without signing. When you are done with the text you are adding to a discussion page, please use four tildes (~~~~) to sign your name and timestamp it. Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 01:19, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Alright -i did not know how to do that until now- Thank you BBMatBlood (talk) 01:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Please don't

Please don't continue making the same unthoughtful edits which I have to revert you on over and over. For example, you and many others keep adding parents' parent companies to infoboxes, including that of Warner Bros. This is wrong and also says so in the guidelines, which I have mentioned quite a couple times.

Another such case is the removal of parent timespans; these are always required when the company was not part of their parent from day alpha and until day omega, yet you keep deleting them with staments like "not needed tbh".

Please refrain from breaking the guidelines, instead, you can help out Wikipedia by fixing articles where it does not done correctly. Regards. Lordtobi (✉) 04:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks LordTobi. My apologise as well.BBMatBlood (talk) 13:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Ghost Story Games

Why not remove Ghost Story Games from 2K's section then? This is misleading. UnknownAssassin1819 (talk) 18:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

It is a 2K studio and there was an agreement to that a while ago.BBMatBlood (talk) 06:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Where's your source? I have mine, their own official website, where's yours? UnknownAssassin1819 (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

sources: take2games.com (our labels), take-two investors relations, their financial filings, i could go on. no need to start a dispute. Ghost Story could have that on their site but they are not a publishing label or subsidiary at least not official, i personally will like to see more labels created.BBMatBlood (talk) 06:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

• Comment: I don't see a point in decentralising this discussion, please continue with any further replies on Take-Two's talk page instead instead of throwing fits here. Lordtobi (✉) 07:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

They're a self-publishing label, T2 probably hasn't listed them anywhere because they haven't released anything yet. Ghost Story isn't a 2K studio, therefore, it should be removed from their subsidiaries list. Come on, Lordtobi, you know i'm right. UnknownAssassin1819 (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Check out Take-Two's talk page where this has already been addressed by another experienced editor. Again, no need to decentralise. Lordtobi (✉) 16:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced edits

This has been a problem for a while, as evidenced by your numerous talk page sections and warnings, from me and others. You need to start sourcing your edits, or I'm going to consider a block. Please add sources to this edit, or I'll revert it shortly. -- ferret (talk) 00:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

I have been abit lazy with wikipedia recently but i am always sourcing my edits. i will make sure to do that. Thanks. BBMatBlood (talk) 16:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The opposite of this also applies. Why are you undoing properly sourced edits without any policy basis? -- ferret (talk) 22:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, What do you mean?BBMatBlood (talk) 00:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

This revert. This is properly sourced and covered facts that were already in the article without a direct source. Adding the head of publishing when the infobox allows for four key individuals in fine, and Venture Beat is certainly a reliable source and appropriate. -- ferret (talk) 02:02, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Some editors including me omitted Gena Feist from the tab so i thought the same for her. ironically i was the one who added the interview first on Take-Two's page (since they are a holding company and it give details on the interview). I apologise for that bad omitting.BBMatBlood (talk) 12:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Visual Concepts

I'm gonna be real with you, I first saw the names "Visual Concepts LA" and "Visual Concepts South" on VC's Linkedin page. It was until a few days later when VC updated their website, that's when VCLA was confirmed, so I just assumed that VC South would also be legit. UnknownAssassin1819 (talk) 00:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Alright no problem.Good to see you are enjoying being a Wikipedia Editor.BBMatBlood (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Rockstar

What's the deal with edit warring at Rockstar Games to denote that key individuals of Rockstar Games are the "such and such title at Rockstar Games"? This doesn't need to be denoted and eats up text space. The article is about Rockstar Games. The key people of ROCKSTAR GAMES of course work at ROCKSTAR GAMES. There's no ambiguity. -- ferret (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Take-Two is an holding parent corporation however the four publishing labels (operating units)-Rockstar Games, 2K, Private Division, and mobile developer Social Point- are not totally independent like say Valve or Epic, and they report directly to Take-Two's CEO Strauss Zelnick so i was using a style i saw somewhere a long time ago (the corporate title and the company name) but yeah it sorted now. Thanks Ferret.BBMatBlood (talk) 10:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Disclosure: I am a fanboy of Rockstar Games.BBMatBlood (talk) 10:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BBMatBlood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney

Please cite with reliable sources before re-adding items into the list. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:AD60:566D:BDE4:D34F (talk) 21:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

National Geographic Partners (NGP) is 75% owned by 21st Century Fox and 25% owned by National Geographic Society and it includes namesake channel National Geographic Channel, National Geographic WILD, Nat Geo Kids, National Geographic Magazine etc. check 21CF.com for information and NGC history on it wikipedia article.BBMatBlood (talk) 00:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney

Thank you for removing that section about the theme park lawsuit. It's pointless and they might reach an agreement on the issue, nothing to do with the merger. Thanos2556 (talk) 22:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

No Problem, However I do not like Vandalism.BBMatBlood (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WarnerMedia; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

I keep providing sources to show Otter is now a principal division or subsidiary of WarnerMedia- that is Warner Bros., HBO, and Turner. I do not like conflict or dispute. Thanks.BBMatBlood (talk) 21:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Can Wikipedia Forgive me?

I am totally sorry for all i have done including using multiple accounts.BBMatBlood (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

You'll never know unless you actually follow the instructions given you above to appeal your block. General Ization ^Talk 18:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

(I have) Done (I think) that. Thank you. I am 100% going to use one account and be 100% good faith (if unblocked). BBMatBlood (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Per what the instructions above, you need to use the actual {{unblock}} template if you want to catch an administrator's attention. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

I already done that. Thank you. BBMatBlood (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

You have not "already done that," but OK, whatever. Perhaps your inability to follow instructions is a sign (along with the fact that you resorted to sockpuppetry even AFTER you were blocked for sockpuppetry) that you don't deserve to be "forgiven." Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Creating Miss Wolvera and continuing to evade your block by IP editing means that you don't know what good faith means.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 01:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Just trying to edit, been banned for a while now. like my above comment i am totally sorry and i am going to 100% commit to being good faith like in pre-2016 and my first full year after joining. If i am not being honest i will not bother making this talk section. Thank you. BBMatBlood (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, just like your above comment from yesterday, the one you made knowing that you had already created a sockpuppet, and just as credible. General Ization ^Talk 00:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Why were you blocked, BBMatBlood? UnknownAssassin1819 (talk) 00:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

warring, using multiple accounts (including sock puppet), and not fully good faith. i am totally sorry. i deserve the block but not for indefinite time. BBMatBlood (talk) 01:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)