Talk:Airbnb

Archives (Index)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Marcomonroy.

Question about the name

How is the name Airbnb pronounced and where does it come from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.44.150.113 (talk) 23:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

I believe it is Air b and b. Instead of an 'n' it is and. Hope that helps. NCSS (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

As a native speaker of American English, when I see "Airbnb", I pronounce it "Air-bee-en-bee". "Bnb" is already an oral abbreviation for "bed-and-breakfast", so that's probably why it was adopted into the name. And most American speakers of English pronounce "bnb" as "bee-en-bee". The "en" isn't a pronunciation of the letter "n", but rather, an unstressed pronunciation of "and". In normal speech, we tend to drop the "d" at the end of "and", especially before a consonant, in an elision. Best regards

TheBaron0530 (talk) 18:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)theBaron0530

It comes from the idea of providing a "B&B" Sevice (bed and breakfast), that might just be an air mattress on your floor. This was the starting point of the organisation.So from that follows the logical pronunciation Air Bee 'n' Bee

Israeli settlements

I recently removed the "Offering accommodation in Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories" subsection that Loranchet added. This is now my second time removing the subsection. I understand the content is sourced but would like to get feedback from others on whether it holds enough weight for inclusion, let alone its own subsection. 03:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

I think it belongs. If AirBnB had issues operating in say, North Korea, or when it opened its first listings in Cuba these would merit inclusion too. There's a risk that this will create an overly long and unweildy article, but I think that's more of an issue with the renter's security section Bangabandhu (talk) 03:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

And that is exactly what I was trying to avoid - an overwhelming list of subsections covering "disputes" the company has and will be involved in. Currently, the Criticism and controversies' section has 11 subsections... Would you be in favor of removing the heading and restoring the information to the Incidents and renters' security subsection rather having a stand alone subsection? Meatsgains (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Heading is unimportant. No objections to what you're suggesting, though I think a new section for AirBnB operations in different parts of the world might break up that very long section. Bangabandhu (talk) 14:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Would a new Operations section covering Airbnb's locations also include information that isn't "Criticism" or "Controversy"? Meatsgains (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Similar content has been restored to the page. I've trimmed the section to avoid WP:UNDUE and WP:EDITWARRING. To the IP who continues to restore the information, please discuss before adding it again. Meatsgains (talk) 01:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Airbnb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121202082459/http://www.businessweek.com/videos/2012-06-19/airbnb-celebrates-over-10-million-nights-booked to http://www.businessweek.com/videos/2012-06-19/airbnb-celebrates-over-10-million-nights-booked
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116010238/http://gawker.com:80/5825262/woman-utterly-pillaged-via-airbnb to http://gawker.com/5825262/woman-utterly-pillaged-via-airbnb

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Missing a verb in "Enforcement response"

In the "Enforcement response" paragraph, there is a verb missing:

"...In July 2016, former Attorney General Eric Holder was hired to help an anti-discrimination policy for Airbnb.[148]"

I'd edit this, but I'm not sure of the original author's intent. From the context, I think he meant, "to help prepare", "to help draft", but maybe he meant something else altogether.

Best regards, TheBaron0530 (talk) 18:52, 18 November 2016 (UTC)theBaron0530

 Done I've added "craft" per the source. Meatsgains (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

How is it "peer to peer"?

Is it "peer to peer" in the same technical sense of the "computer networks" peer-to-peer article, or just a manner of saying that the clients of the service deal with one another directly, with an "automated" intermediary service? To me it seems that the closest thing to an analogy with computer P2P network would be to say it's literally an "analog peer to peer sharing of resources", so, it's not that the software in your device that is doing the typical P2P stuff, but rather it's just the protocol for the "analog sharing". But so would be paper or more static classifieds "P2P", then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.68.96.29 (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Euclid, Ohio codified ordinance regarding rentals

1761.01 RENTALS, HOTELS, MOTELS; CERTIFICATE REQUIRED.

  On and after January 1, 1989, it shall be unlawful for the owner, agent or person in charge of any dwelling structure used, designed or intended to be used as a multiple dwelling or a single or two-family dwelling structure, or any operator of any hotel or motel intended to accommodate transient guests, to rent or lease such structure or any part thereof for residential occupancy, or temporary occupancy by transient guests, unless the owner thereof holds a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Commissioner of Buildings for such structure, which Certificate has not expired, been revoked or otherwise become null and void, or unless such structure or part thereof is licensed as a temporary rooming house.  

(Ord. 74-1996. Passed 4-1-96; Eff. 5-1-96.)” </ref>§Daniel H. Garland

References

Appears promotional

I doubt the neutrality of the article. Parts of the Airbnb entry appear advertorial and promotional and give the impression that someone close to Airbnb may have edited it to let Airbnb look good. One example is some language, e.g. "almost all Airbnb experiences work out perfectly." Another example is the structure of the article, with Airbnb's insignificant sponsoring activities appearing above criticism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.41.165.40 (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Added by Cloversmate: I have to concur with this experience. Around March 2017, I edited the early section that talks about guest fees. This very early and prominent section refers to guest service fees - 'On each booking, the company charges guests a 6%-12% guest services fee and charges hosts a 3% host service fee'.

From my own research, this is clearly not true. The article replicates the info on the Airbnb website and understates the fees charges - well those in the UK market where guest fees are typically 15-16%. Really very high given that Airbnb is also charging hosts an additional fee (around 3%). Within a week or two, this extra information was deleted back to the original statement of 6-12%. It looks very likely, to me, as a professional journalist, that someone from Airbnb is editing the Wiki entry, or doing it on their behalf. BEWARE ANY INFORMATION ON THIS ENTRY - I AM VERY SURE THAT THIS WIKI ENTRY IS BEING COMMERCIALLY EDITED to make AirBnb look good. Comment added by Cloversmate 17 May 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloversmate (talk • contribs) 10:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't think that I've read a more promotional page on Wikipedia to date. I've copy-edited it for NPOV and encyclopedic format, inviting other editors to check for NPOV. I hope it's also now more accessible to edits of individual entries (and omissions).AHampton (talk) 20:42, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

NPOV? Nature of the business model/ pattern

I think the page is a bit misleading in presenting AirBnB as a "hospitality service" like CouchSurfing or Be Welcome, social networks sharing accommodation based on reputation. AirBnB is really a catalogue and booking platform for a massive, transnational motel franchise, which accepts anyone as a franchisee, as long as they have space to rent and can operate the platform from their own device. Comparing themselves to CouchSurfing et al is their PR, not an accurate description, as is referring to Rachel Botsman's concept of 'Collaborative Consumption', without also referring to ideas like Commons-based Peer Production, which highlights the important differences between reciprocity-based sharing clubs like CouchSurfing and financially-based booking services like AirBnB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danylstrype (talk • contribs) 15:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

AirBnB discriminating against guests based on their political or religious views

"Airbnb has canceled a number of accounts and bookings associated with the Unite the Right Free Speech Rally... Airbnb confirmed that it had canceled the accounts of some users who were involved with the event, citing the company’s request that its users sign a commitment to “accept people regardless of their race, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or age.”" [1]. The article makes clear that it is guests rather than hosts that were affected. Jaw-droppingly astonishing - a company would not be allowed to operate that way under EU law for example, and it's obviously a abrogation of their own supposed commitment to "accept people regardless of their race, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or age". At first sight, a policy that demands users "accept people regardless..." would be assumed to apply to hosts accepting guests, and absolutely not be a requirement that guests must hold a particular political or societal view before they can be accepted as AirBnB customers! Is this sort of discrimination allowable for hosts too? For example, are hosts allowed to refuse bookings by single women, or couples who are not married? (Booking.com allows this, for example "Please note that XXXXX Hotel does not accept bookings from non-married couples. All couples must present a valid marriage certificate upon check-in" is a commonly seen on that site) Should we have a section on the user policies of AirBnB? Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 14:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Criticism section - Facebook linkage, inadequate help

The current Criticism section is very mild/simplified. For example, it skips over the growing situation where would-be users who do not have an active Facebook (or similar) life, or do not want it entangled with their Airbnb account, are being effectively shut out of participating.

It may not be sufficiently "notable" that entire websites are devoted to Airbnb complaints. But the user feedback on fairly neutral/respectable BBB is a tidal wave of overwhelmingly negative individual experiences, with a common theme: a lot of time/money/distress is at stake in each transaction, there is a lot that can and does go wrong, and the Airbnb rules are more complex than many users understand; when users have problems they frequently cannot get timely and adequate help from Airbnb. Is there some good and appropriate way to add this to the article?

A would-be user of the service who carefully researches the situation before trying to join could reasonably conclude that the experience would be uncertain and risky in a daunting variety of ways. -71.174.175.134 (talk) 13:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Sounds like someone has a vendetta against the company. Bad experienced with Airbnb or what? Everthing you noted above is WP:UNDUE criticism and unless it is referenced in multiple reliable sources, it should not be added. Meatsgains (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

I think the main focus of this section should be the struggle within city/state/national governments on how to adequately regulate Airbnb to address its criticisms. As of November 2017, countless cities and local governments around the world (not just San Francisco and Scotland) are still struggling with accommodating Airbnb while also appeasing local critics. An example is San Diego, where the city attorney deemed short-term rentals illegal while the city council refuses to enforce such mandate and is trying to pass legislation allowing for short-term rentals. This struggle applies to many other local governments, and so I think a general summary of pro-Airbnb and anti-Airbnb arguments should be included. Further, Airbnb has addressed some of its criticism and now has a page for hosts with instructions on how to abide by local regulations. The current criticism section does not include any proposed solutions to the criticisms, either on Airbnb's or the government's behalf. Ultimately, I think the section should be reframed as a developing story as opposed to a list of criticisms, given that the discussion is still ongoing and new policy options are still being tested and implemented. Marcomonroy (talk) 04:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Tax avoidance by Airbnb-More examples

It would be pertinent to add a paragraph on special laws that were adopted in some countries to stop tax avoidance. For example, in 2015 the province of Quebec in Canada adopted a new law, Bill 67, to regulate tourist lodging.ABBslp (talk) 20:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Crimes committed by users- Relevance

I feel like the content of this section should either be removed or edited. The paragraph lacks relevant information about the subject in question and cites newspaper articles describing sensationalist horror stories that happened to people using Airbnb. More objective and reliable data such as the number of crimes listed by city and type seems more appropriate for this section.ABBslp (talk) 21:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

I agree and went ahead and removed the section for being WP:UNDUE. If we are to have a section like this, it'd be very difficult to decide what is and isn't notable enough to warrant inclusion. Meatsgains (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Government actions against Airbnb and short-term rental

This section appears to be a violation of WP:Globalize. Are we going to list every city in the world that regulates Airbnb and the history of the regulations? There are thousands of cities that regulate Airbnb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.196.163.157 (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

No they aren't that many. And we put in what is notable and sum it up like we did in that section. It can't be done better than that including various viewpoints on the regulations. With the EU section mentioned, it makes it obvious that restrictions or attempts against Airbnb have been made. Likewise in America, the story is the same. The mention of Arizona and other states banning municipalities from interfering indicates that it has been banned or restricted across various American cities.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

There are plenty. You mentioned a few cities in the U.S. as well as the EU in general. There are specific regulations for Airbnb is almost every major city in the U.S. You can write an entire article about Airbnb in New York City, but NYC is not even mentioned in this section. Several cities in Europe, such as Paris, Berlin, and Barcelona have detailed restrictions on Airbnb. And there is no mention of any of the regulations in Australia, taxes required in Mexico City, and the stringent regulations in South Korean cities. Those are just a few examples.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.196.163.157 (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Let's see how the current version of the article turns out, otherwise I'll make a proposal here, but don't do anything for now.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

"Awards" section

I don't see how winning an "app" award at SXSW or "best place to work" in the Glassdoor "employee's choice" award are important enough for this article. If you feel they are, perhaps they could be moved into the "History" section (which is a disaster of its own). power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

"Benefits" is arguably promotional but I don't care enough to argue about it. It may be worth moving it under "Overview", though. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Makes sense to me, and I didn't add back the second award because there was no secondary source talking about. I've made the suggested edits. Saturnalia0 (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Should we include this source?

[2] can this be added to the controversies section?--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

I see no reason why it can't be mentioned in the Concerns and resistance from the hotel industry subsection. Meatsgains^(talk) 02:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Guest review section

"Therefore, it's impossible to obtain an objective picture of the property from the reviews on Airbnb." This is opinionated and only represents some people's perspective rather than being presented as a matter of fact. To my knowledge this system has a mutual guest and host review. Or am I wrong about that?--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

This also contradicts above section which states this has a mutual guest-host review system.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

I agree NadirAli, I have rewritten the section to make it more objective. The above statement was purely opinion. The review system is mutual and has some in-built mechanisms to promote accuracy and objectivity in reviews, obviously there are shortcomings which I have presented in a more factual manner. Wpcwpc (talk) 19:28, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Safety mechanisms section has serious NOR, POV, and missiong citations issues.

The majority of the safety mechanisms section either has no citations or disingenuous citations. Highly critical statements, inferences, and conclusions regarding Airbnb are made with no support. I feel that there is a clear deviation from a neutral viewpoint and significant amounts of original research. I believe most of this section should be removed if sources cannot be found. I have added a missing citations tag, and I think a POV and NOR tag would also be appropriate. All of these statements were added two days ago by User:Igaskin. I have removed this user's contributions - they can be re-added when they have specific sources to support them. 134.223.230.152 (talk) 13:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Online presence / Tech community influence

I feel like it might be of interest to provide information regarding Airbnb's influence in the software open source community. Among other things, they are responsible for Enzyme, which is a very commonly-used testing framework for React systems. They are also well-known for their JavaScript style guide, which is incredibly popular as an adopted style standard. Would this information belong in its own section? The headers I came up with for this section are "Online presence" or "Tech community influence" but I'm not sure what would be appropriate. Poplopo (talk) 19:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

This may be a bit WP:UNDUE. Can you find independent reliable for support? Meatsgains^(talk) 01:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Seems worth looking into and possibly including. AHampton (talk) 17:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Page protection

This page is frequently edited to remove masses of information perceived as negative, so should be protected, in my opinion. Ditto Uber... often by the same IPs. AHampton (talk) 17:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Legit pic or advertising?

Struck me as advertising, not sure it should be on Wikipedia... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Airbnb_app_screenshot.png AHampton (talk) 17:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Settlements

We have a minor edit war over how to handle the decision to remove listings. I think that section of this article should probably be viewed as included in the articles subject to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles. One factor is the range of opinion: not all Israelis support expansion of settlements, Palestinians are disappointed at the mildness of AirBnB's reasoning. I particularly noted that no Palestinian could possibly book one of those listings, a point AirBnB cited. Also, this might be a test of US and state anti-boycott laws. Human Rights Watch has not been mentioned so far. User:Fred Bauder Talk 10:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Airbnb did not prevent Palestinians from booking these listings, and it is inaccurate to state that "no Palestinian could possibly book one of those listings" - I can think of several circumstances in which a Palestinian could book and stay (the converse by the way (Israelis booking in Palestinian controlled cities) is not true - Israelis are not permitted, by ordinance, to enter Area A of the West Bank).Icewhiz (talk) 10:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

The words AirBnB used were "effectively banned." User:Fred Bauder Talk 15:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

A few of the listings are in illegal (according to Israel, itself) settlements on land owned by Palestinians. User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

It's ridiculous to pile on source after source that are all basically the same story in different news outlets. Do some pruning. And cut out the predictable opinion-spamming (you know who you are). Zero^talk 13:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

There really is excessive sourcing.Bangabandhu (talk) 15:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

The attempt to attribute Airbnb's decision to the BDS movement is not supported by either of the given sources. So it must go. Zero^talk 08:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

this source right here says airbnb caved into pressure from BDS--1.136.110.168 (talk) 21:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

here is bds saying it is "A Partial Victory for Human Rights & Accountability" --1.136.110.168 (talk) 21:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Apart from the title of the opinion piece (written by some sub-editor, which counts zero) you found only after-the-fact approvals. Zero^talk 01:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

We don't need quotes from pundits on either side explaining the move. Lots of people call it anti-semitic, regardless of the merit of that claim, and it is (briefly, without WP:UNDUE) reflected in the text. Bangabandhu (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

The Simon Wiesenthal center is not a "pundit" - but rather one of the leading bodies that studies antisemitism. Furthermore, it seems that the majority of coverage is focused on antisemitism - and per WP:W - we should follow that as well.Icewhiz (talk) 06:26, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

It is ok to quote criticism within modest limits but it isn't ok to quote yellow text like "names schools and shopping centers in honor of mass murderers" which is not even about the topic. And the SWC is an advocacy organization, obviously. Now there are 5 words which mention praise without saying what it is, and 72 words of explicit criticism. Please explain why you think NPOV is satisfied by this. On second thoughts, don't bother. Zero^talk 07:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:BALASP, per continuing coverage of the topic in RS, though I agree the Palestinian response could be expanded from sources covering the airbnb decision. Icewhiz (talk) 07:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

I see. You added a non-Israeli response from an advocacy organization but you think only Palestinian negative responses are due. Got it. Zero^talk 10:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Hmm.. I think you have cut out a lot of text that was relevant Icewhiz. The section now doesn't even mention the BDS campaign, nor the legal issues surrounding the West Bank listings. The likely reason (imo) for the delisting is that the company was in breach of EU law and that the European Commission would be eligible to issue stiff fines on it. It is not WP:BALANCED that the section mentions SWC:s partisan opinion, but not BDS:s. ImTheIP (talk) 09:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

There was a claim that Airbnb's decision was due to pressure from the BDS movement. That should not be reinserted, because it was unsourced. Airbnb did not disclose the source of the complaints it received and we don't need speculation. The BDS movement issued a statement in support after the announcement; it is eligible for insertion but I won't. More relevant would be to cite HRW. I might do that. Zero^talk 10:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

I didn't remove BDS (I think!) - it got trimmed by someone else (I think!). In as much as we have reasonable sources connection the two (or claiming to connect the two) - it should go in.Icewhiz (talk) 14:02, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

You removed a quite important part here claiming it was WP:SYNTH. That Airbnb could have faced prosecution from the European Commission clearly is relevant... ImTheIP (talk) 18:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

clear SYNTH.Icewhiz (talk) 18:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

It would be SYNTH to attribute Airbnb's recent announcement to Dugard's opinion, but to simply present it as an example of criticism that Airbnb has faced over the settlements in the past would clearly be allowed. Zero^talk 01:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

When I inserted it last week [3] the context was clearer, but the section has changed a lot since. ImTheIP (talk) 12:09, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Delisting of Jewish settlements

There has been a partial retraction of airbnb's policy, source. --101.173.77.164 (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

What does Airbnb mean?

Is it for Air Bed 'n' Breakfast?

There should be an explanation for the name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:4671:FA00:B82E:AD94:2D1:A983 (talk) 04:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

HRW belongs

There was no policy-based justification for removing HRW. Not only are they an extremely respected authority on human rights issues, but they had just completed a detailed study of exactly this topic. On the contrary, SWC is just an advocacy organization making a predictable knee-jerk response. Zero^talk 09:59, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

The SWC is an extremely respected authority on antisemitism. More importantly we have the Los Angeles Times (and a whole raft of other top-notch sources) covering the SWC's statements, while the HRW bit was sourced to HRW's website - WP:UNDUE. Icewhiz (talk) 10:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

A HRW report on HRW's website is a perfectly valid source. Their report was covered in newspapers too, as you could have determined in 30 seconds. Zero^talk 00:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Spanish protests (Barcelona)

The Barcelona protests in part against Airbnb, and the legal threats and action against Airbnb by Barcelona and Madrid's government, were major news stories - much larger than anything which happened in Scotland. Seems to me this warrants inclusion in the Housing Affordability subheading of 'Controversies' subsection, or somewhere else. Barcelona is conspicuous by its absence in my opinion.148.64.26.221 (talk) 12:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

References

Infobox update

Hello, I'm Jakob and I work for Airbnb. I've created an account so I can suggest updates to the Wikipedia article. I've disclosed my conflict of interest on this talk page and on my profile page, and I plan to only post requests on discussion pages instead of editing them myself.

For my first request, I'm hoping to have the Key personnel part of the infobox updated:

• Nathan Blecharczyk is no longer CTO, and hasn't been for years. He's now chief strategy officer (Forbes source)
• Brian Chesky's title includes both CEO and Co-founder (Forbes source, Airbnb source)

Other C-suite leadership include :

• Belinda Johnson (COO), Fortune source, Vogue source, Airbnb source
• Dave Stephenson (CFO), TechCrunch source, Airbnb source
• Ari Balogh (CTO), CNBC source

I understand I can't rely on the Airbnb website for these updates, but wanted to share them as official confirmation in addition to better news sources like Forbes, Fortune, and TechCrunch. Can an editor review these sources and update the infobox? If I need to rephrase my request, or if you have questions, please let me know here, as I'll be watching the page. JK Airbnb (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Reply 11-APR-2019

  Edit request partially implemented  

1. ✓ Blecharczyk's role updated.
2. ✗ Chesky is already listed both under the |founders= parameter as a co-founder and the |key people= parameter as CEO.
3. ✗ Minor executives are generally not included.

Regards,  Spintendo  21:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Airbnb and Israel

Airbnb announced that it would end its policy prohibiting listings owned by Jews in Judea and Samaria from being listed on their platform, here is the source. --2001:8003:4163:AD00:414C:AA47:8AB0:127A (talk) 08:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Acquisitions subsection

Hi, Jakob here again with Airbnb. Thanks to User:Spintendo for assisting above.

I'd like to suggest an organizational improvement to the article's "History" section. Right now the section starts with decent prose but then quickly devolves into a string of facts. I suggest creating a subsection called "Acquisitions" to improve the article's structure and make reading easier.

I saved the "History" section's markup at User:JK Airbnb/Draft, then moved text about acquisitions into a subsection. You can see specific content moves here. I think both the "History" and "Acquisitions" sections could be improved further, but for this request I'm focusing on just moving text for organizational reasons.

If approved, can someone copy the draft markup to replace the text of the current history section? Thank you. JK Airbnb (talk) 21:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)