User talk:Minecrafter0271: Difference between revisions
→Birkhoff's theorem (equational logic): Proposed some more changes |
Requested an unblocking. |
||
Line 626: | Line 626: | ||
{{reflist-talk}} |
{{reflist-talk}} |
||
== Unblock request == |
|||
{{unblock|1=Above, I have proposed some changes to an article as required for a second chance. I believe that it's enough to win back the trust of he community. [[User:Minecrafter0271|Minecrafter0271]] ([[User talk:Minecrafter0271#top|talk]]) 19:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 19:28, 14 February 2020
Please read this box first! Welcome to my talk page! Questions, information, warnings? Say it here! Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, please sign your topic by placing ~~~~ (four tildes) at the very end, and please remember, assume good faith! You can click here to start a new topic. |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Minecrafter0271! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 22:49, Thursday, January 2, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Minecrafter0271! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 23:01, Thursday, January 2, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Minecrafter0271! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 23:14, Thursday, January 2, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
My GA Reviews
Hello! I just went through the "New reviewer" discussion on WP:GA talk page, and I need to clear some things up. First off, I am taking a break from GA reviews, but I'm not quitting. I just am tired of people complaining about me. But, I wanted to talk about it. Aircorn said I feel we are dealing with a young, enthusiastic editor
. I am young and enthusiastic. I also saw some recommendations for mentoring of new reviewers like me, which I would highly appreciate. I know I created the false impression that I don't want any feedback, but I do. If my reviews were a mess, then why don't you say so on the review page? Or on my talk page, which only Mujinga and Aircorn had done. But don't say that behind my back. Again, I would love some mentorship, and to become a decent editor one day. Thank you for understanding. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 03:55, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Minecrafter0271, I would be happy to mentor and help out although my experience on Good Articles is admittedly still quite limited. Wikipedia is generally a friendly and welcoming place, so pleasee do feel free to ask for help. I'm replying here because you pinged me, I don't have so much to add. I could definitely recommend reading some other good article reviews to see how other people do it. Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 20:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Mujinga. I would be happy to be mentored by you, thanks. Cheers.
- Great just drop me a line on my talkpage or ping me here if you have questions. The ping above didn't work out, probably because you forgot to sign the post with the four tildes. I also find if you preview a message containing a ping it doesn't work, so it's best to add the ping last before posting. That's my top tip for today!! Mujinga (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Mujinga. I would be happy to be mentored by you, thanks. Cheers.
- Hi Minecrafter0271, I would be happy to mentor and help out although my experience on Good Articles is admittedly still quite limited. Wikipedia is generally a friendly and welcoming place, so pleasee do feel free to ask for help. I'm replying here because you pinged me, I don't have so much to add. I could definitely recommend reading some other good article reviews to see how other people do it. Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 20:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Merge of Articles of Impeachment
Good job on the merge. Looks like you followed the instructions just fine. Thanks. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 11:34, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sirfurboy. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
How did you get the wings?
I'm just wondering on your user page, you had wings badges, how do you get them? Also, welcome to Wikipedia! New3400 (talk) 00:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- I played through the Wikipedia Adventure, and they were just added in automatically as I progressed. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 01:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 16:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Minecrafter0271! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 01:08, Friday, January 24, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi Minecrafter0271! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
Hi Minecrafter0271! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
February 2020
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to List of YouTubers, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. hey, you kinda broke the table with that edit. LanHikari64 (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to the GOCE!
Welcome to WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors "Make it say what it means and mean what it says" – Wikipedia: How to copy edit |
Hello Minecrafter0271 and welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors! We are glad that you have decided to help us in our mission to improve grammar on the English Wikipedia! Here are some links that you might find helpful to get started on your copy-editing journey!
You can help out here already have considerable English copy-editing skills or start out here to gain experience.
Thank you so much for joining the GOCE, we appreciate it!
For the GOCE, Puddleglum 2.0 17:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Minecrafter0271! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 22:57, Friday, February 7, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Teahouse Hosts
- Thank you for your keenness to help others, though. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparison of project management software, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AGPL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
Hello, I'm Magnolia677. An edit that you recently made to Mississippi River seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see Template:Infobox river for template details. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Arbitration Committee RfC
Hi. I see that you have been posting endorsements on different sections of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee. I'm one of the arbitrators and I appreciate your interest in our work. However, that request for comment was posted in 2008 to discuss the Committee as it existed at that time, more than eleven years ago. It is no longer being read or updated and it is not useful for you to be editing that particular page now. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Newyorkbrad: Oops. I thought the ones on the top were the newer ones, or they would be archived or something. Sorry. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 16:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- On the top where? Let me know where you were looking and I'll see if that ought to be clarified. Thanks, Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Newyorkbrad: On the top of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee. Please get that sorted out. And, aren't discussions from 11 YEARS ago supposed to be closed and archived? It was still open! Please get that clarified, thanks. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- On the top where? Let me know where you were looking and I'll see if that ought to be clarified. Thanks, Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
Hello, I'm S. M. Nazmus Shakib. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. G. Marar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. The discussion is not finished yet. Even, it was relisted. Why dou you keep it? If you do it again, your activities will be complained. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @S. M. Nazmus Shakib: I use the XFDCloser. I accidentally clicked "Quick Close." Unfortunately, there was no "confirm" message, it just got closed right away. I tried to undo it, but I couldn't find out how to. Thanks for the warning, though. I'll make sure it doesn't happen again. Also, you might want to change the tone. It is very harsh, and kind of intimidating. Just for future reference. Thanks. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 03:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- For future reference, if you appeal to WP:BITE, either implicitly or explicitly, it doesn't apply to you. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: What do you mean? Minecrafter0271 (talk) 03:35, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- For future reference, if you appeal to WP:BITE, either implicitly or explicitly, it doesn't apply to you. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Slow down
You're moving too fast. At the current rate, you're very likely to end up blocked for disruptive editing while trying to be very helpful. Yes, we block people who are trying to be helpful when they don't listen to the advice like Newyorkbrad is giving you less bluntly above and I'm giving you more bluntly here. Focus on content, then move on to maintenance tasks later. I unfortunately mainly deal with WP: space these days, but no one gets respect on this project for only dealing with behind the scenes stuff. We are here to build an encyclopedia and content comes first. Focus on that, and then eventually you can move to other areas. If you want to look at this as a "warning" you can, but it's really meant to help you, and not in a mean way. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: Okay. You say that it's not a warning... RIGHT AFTER YOU THREATEN TO BAN ME! Sorry, but I'm getting kind of angry. I don't need a ban right now, actually, that's the LAST thing I need. I know you're trying to help, but this isn't the right way. I will focus on content though, so I don't get banned. Which, if I DID get banned, I would probably appeal unless the blocking admin provides a substantial amount of evidence. Other than that, I have nothing else to say. Bye. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 03:41, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- No, actually, I said it was a warning but to take it as my trying to let you know that you're on the path to a block so you can avoid it. If you want it more explicit, I can do that was well: stop getting involved in areas over your head where you have no clue how it works or you'll either be blocked by an individual admin or by a thread at ANI.You're not the first user to act like this and you won't be the last. Those who take the advice to slow down tend to do well here. Those who don't tend to exit on the community's terms rather than your own. As for your question above: you're pretty clearly playing appealing to the principles in WP:BITE both here and in your response to the warning above, and doing it in a way to try to distract from the fact that people have pointed out legitimate issues with your approach (namely, you're doing things you have no clue how to do.)If you know enough about Wikipedia to know that being kind to new users and helping them grow is one of our behavioural norms, you know enough about Wikipedia to not really be considered a newcomer and to know most of our other behavioural norms. (See this essay which I just wrote on the topic since it comes up frequently enough.) TonyBallioni (talk) 03:57, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Minecrafter0271, I actually came here to give similar advice. TonyBallioni didn't threaten to ban you - the point of what he's saying is that you're jumping into things too quickly and you're not really listening to experienced editors (I count at least four on this talk page) who are gently trying to tell you that you need to slow down. I get it, you're new and want to help out, but right now the problem is that you're not listening, and not listening + over-eager new editors often equals disruptive editing. Please just take some time to work in article space - write an article, improve an article, clean up vandalism, whatever suits your fancy - and just watch Wikipedia space so that you can learn what the norms and culture are. creffett (talk) 04:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
February 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Minecrafter0271 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay. I understand what I did wrong. I tried diving into behind-the-scenes editing too soon. I understand everyone's frustration. I swear I will change. If I don't, I will leave Wikipedia forever. Just please give me a second chance. Thanks. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You will have to show a much higher level of self-awareness and caution than you've displayed so far in your editing career. Your declaration immediately below that you're just misunderstood doesn't advance that cause. Everybody else here is a volunteer, and you're using up time and patience with a bull-in-a-china-shop approach to the encyclopedia project. Acroterion (talk) 04:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Minecrafter0271 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Per what I've stated below. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 04:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Read our guide to improving articles.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
- Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
- Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
{{infobox name|...}}
); - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:
[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]
); - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
[[Category:Name]]
); - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:
{{Foo stub}}
);
- do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:
- Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this:
== [[Article title]] ==
) the copied content but do not save yet; - Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "
Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution.
" - You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose:
{{reflist-talk}}
. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
- Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "
" to your talk page. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 05:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Your first edit after my warning above was to request a reliable source for a mathematical fact, while reviewing an edit request. I'll let someone else review this unblock since I just was warning you, but you look to be trolling us. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Second chances aren't given to people who are just here to troll the encyclopedia. In just over a month you have done nothing in the mainspace but add tags, propose deletions and a tad bit of vandal reverting. Everywhere else you are just purely trolling like the edit request you just declined, asked for a RS when it's a mathematical fact. Beyond that, you've trolled just about every other Wikipedia space available. I wouldn't be surprised if you were someone's sock given the knowledge you put in to your first edits. It just looks like your around to get by 500/30. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:23, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: @DeltaQuad: Okay. I AM NOT A TROLL! I am an editor. I'm not a sock. I'm not any of that. I'm not trying to troll anyone here. I'm not trying to get around 500/30. All of those allegations are false. I'm sorry if I made it seem that way, but I can promise, if I'm unblocked, that I will be a better contributor to Wikipedia. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 04:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Not addressing your disruptive behavior but claiming our assessment is all wrong is the perfect way to get unblocked. Have a good night. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @DeltaQuad: I said, in my review summary, that I know what I did wrong. I like to pounce into things to early. That's me. I know I have to change it, and I will. However, calling me a "troll" is completely false. I'm not saying "I'M INNOCENT!!!" Since you want me to address my behavior, I will do that. So, let's talk about the edit request. They provided a number with no citation. They just need to go to Google, find a source (there should be hundreds), come back, then make the request again. Now, about the AfDs and the tags. I admit, I was being a bit obsessive. I shouldn't do that. I'll be sure to cut it down if I'm unblocked. Also, I'll try doing some more mainspace edits. I think I've gone through all of it. Now, once again, I. Am. Not. A. Sock. I just wanted to clarify that. Please consider what I've stated above. Thanks. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 04:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Just my two cents, and I may be wrong, but I don't think a mathematical fact should need to be cited. You don't see 2+2=4 being cited anywhere, because everyone already knows it to be fact. Looked at your response to what should've been a routine, easy change. What? 1000 million is never correct. It is always 1 billion. Stuff like that does not need to be cited. It just is. If we needed to cite that, we'd end up having to change like 1000 million pages to cite how numbers work. LanHikari64 (talk) 05:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- You also probably shouldn't remove an active block message. Just saying. LanHikari64 (talk) 06:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @LanHikari64: I tried removing the retired template, and for some reason, it removed the block message. I don't know what happened. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 06:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Minecrafter0271, answer me this - do you think that 1000 million and 1 billion are not equal values? I'm wondering if there's some confusion about that going on. creffpublic a creffett franchise (talk to the boss) 15:41, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Creffett: Yes. However, for some reason I missed the "million" part. Probably because I was tired. If I had realized that, then I would have definitely done it. Also, don't mind the retired template. I just leave it there because the block notice above for some reason disappears when I try to remove the retired template. Cheers! Minecrafter0271 (talk) 18:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Minecrafter0271, answer me this - do you think that 1000 million and 1 billion are not equal values? I'm wondering if there's some confusion about that going on. creffpublic a creffett franchise (talk to the boss) 15:41, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @LanHikari64: I tried removing the retired template, and for some reason, it removed the block message. I don't know what happened. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 06:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- You also probably shouldn't remove an active block message. Just saying. LanHikari64 (talk) 06:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Just my two cents, and I may be wrong, but I don't think a mathematical fact should need to be cited. You don't see 2+2=4 being cited anywhere, because everyone already knows it to be fact. Looked at your response to what should've been a routine, easy change. What? 1000 million is never correct. It is always 1 billion. Stuff like that does not need to be cited. It just is. If we needed to cite that, we'd end up having to change like 1000 million pages to cite how numbers work. LanHikari64 (talk) 05:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @DeltaQuad: I said, in my review summary, that I know what I did wrong. I like to pounce into things to early. That's me. I know I have to change it, and I will. However, calling me a "troll" is completely false. I'm not saying "I'M INNOCENT!!!" Since you want me to address my behavior, I will do that. So, let's talk about the edit request. They provided a number with no citation. They just need to go to Google, find a source (there should be hundreds), come back, then make the request again. Now, about the AfDs and the tags. I admit, I was being a bit obsessive. I shouldn't do that. I'll be sure to cut it down if I'm unblocked. Also, I'll try doing some more mainspace edits. I think I've gone through all of it. Now, once again, I. Am. Not. A. Sock. I just wanted to clarify that. Please consider what I've stated above. Thanks. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 04:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Not addressing your disruptive behavior but claiming our assessment is all wrong is the perfect way to get unblocked. Have a good night. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: @DeltaQuad: Okay. I AM NOT A TROLL! I am an editor. I'm not a sock. I'm not any of that. I'm not trying to troll anyone here. I'm not trying to get around 500/30. All of those allegations are false. I'm sorry if I made it seem that way, but I can promise, if I'm unblocked, that I will be a better contributor to Wikipedia. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 04:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
In logic, Birkhoff's theorem states that an equality t = u is a semantic consequence of a set of equalities E, if and only if t = u can be proven from the set of equalities.[1]
According to Birkhoff's theorem, formal languages are considered to be models of natural languages. In mathematical logic, a person creates several classes of formal languages, to which first order logic and equational logic are of the highest importance. [2]
Equational languages are formal languages made up of countable variables, function symbols and an equality symbol. [3]
Equational logic can be combined with first order logic. Much of equational logic is derived from first order logic. [4]
References
- ^ Baader, Franz; Nipkow, Tobias (March 1998). "Term Rewriting and All That". Cambridge Core. p. Th. 3.5.14, p. 55. Retrieved 2020-02-13.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Equational logic. Jan Mycielski (originator), Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Equational_logic&oldid=13940
- ^ Equational logic. Jan Mycielski (originator), Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Equational_logic&oldid=13940
- ^ Sakharov, Alex. "Equational Logic." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource, created by Eric W. Weisstein. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EquationalLogic.html
Unblock request
Minecrafter0271 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Above, I have proposed some changes to an article as required for a second chance. I believe that it's enough to win back the trust of he community. [[User:Minecrafter0271|Minecrafter0271]] ([[User talk:Minecrafter0271#top|talk]]) 19:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Above, I have proposed some changes to an article as required for a second chance. I believe that it's enough to win back the trust of he community. [[User:Minecrafter0271|Minecrafter0271]] ([[User talk:Minecrafter0271#top|talk]]) 19:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Above, I have proposed some changes to an article as required for a second chance. I believe that it's enough to win back the trust of he community. [[User:Minecrafter0271|Minecrafter0271]] ([[User talk:Minecrafter0271#top|talk]]) 19:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}