Jump to content

User talk:Muboshgu: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Oi: Replying to 1983cakkyboy19831983 (using reply-link)
Line 319: Line 319:
Why did you delete my edit! Its on the news! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:1983cakkyboy19831983|1983cakkyboy19831983]] ([[User talk:1983cakkyboy19831983#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/1983cakkyboy19831983|contribs]]) 00:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Why did you delete my edit! Its on the news! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:1983cakkyboy19831983|1983cakkyboy19831983]] ([[User talk:1983cakkyboy19831983#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/1983cakkyboy19831983|contribs]]) 00:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{u|1983cakkyboy19831983}}, edits of a sensitive nature like that, on a [[WP:BLP|biography of a living person]], require [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I see none. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|1983cakkyboy19831983}}, edits of a sensitive nature like that, on a [[WP:BLP|biography of a living person]], require [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I see none. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Its all over the news! Don't you watch TV?

Revision as of 00:42, 26 November 2020


Reggie Bagala

Hello, I noticed that you helped to edit Bob Glanzer and Isaac Robinson's pages after they died from coronavirus. I am wondering if you would like to also help with Reggie Bagala who has also recently died from it. - Jon698 talk 2:41 10 April 2020

You posted that my recent editing history at Kimberly Klacik shows that I am currently engaged in an edit war

Font size infoboxes at US Congresses articles.

Howdy. If I agree to go with regular size font, even though it would crowd up (see 93rd United States Congress) the names? Will you agree not to add the brackets, which only crowds up the names more? GoodDay (talk) 22:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GoodDay, no brackets is fine. But MOS:SMALLFONT is otherwise non-negotiable. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, even though it makes the print messy & crowded. GoodDay (talk) 23:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
PS- I'm adding spacing as well. Will make infoboxes slightly longer, but less crowded with the larger font for the service dates. GoodDay (talk) 23:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GoodDay, sounds good. Smaller font is inaccessible for many. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Got implemented, in all the US Congress articles, where required. GoodDay (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Only way around spacing, would've been 'blue' colouring for the service dates. But, I don't know how to do that. GoodDay (talk) 00:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. Just in case you missed the ping. A new editor has joined the discussion on this topic, over at 117th United States Congress article. GoodDay (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kamala Harris edit

You closed the issue I submitted saying to check the FAQs. What am I supposed to be looking for in the FAQ specifically???? FactsRFun2020 (talk) 21:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
203 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ben Gleib (talk) Add sources
6,473 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA Republican reactions to Donald Trump's claims of 2020 election fraud (talk) Add sources
66 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Arvin Vohra (talk) Add sources
14,602 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C United States presidential transition (talk) Add sources
1,653 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Jade Simmons (talk) Add sources
4,222 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Desegregation busing (talk) Add sources
4,134 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: FA United States Senate career of Joe Biden (talk) Cleanup
236 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Michael Grimm (politician) (talk) Cleanup
176 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Lake Allatoona (talk) Cleanup
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start United States Senate Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee (talk) Expand
57 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Bến Thành Market (talk) Expand
1,537 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Manuel Merino (talk) Expand
54 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Asian quota (talk) Unencyclopaedic
5,607 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Karen (pejorative) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,410 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination (talk) Unencyclopaedic
38,255 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA President-elect of the United States (talk) Merge
8,099 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C 2020 United States election protests (talk) Merge
83 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus (talk) Merge
1,908 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Marianne Williamson (talk) Wikify
3,261 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Napoleonic Wars (talk) Wikify
410 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Stetson University (talk) Wikify
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Monisha Ghosh (talk) Orphan
25 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C LendingPoint (talk) Orphan
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Cheryl Contee (talk) Orphan
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Philip Lawrence (politician) (talk) Stub
37 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Jeff Mackler (talk) Stub
95,718 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA Family of Joe Biden (talk) Stub
264 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Oklahoma (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub United States Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Josh Tobias for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Tobias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Tobias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dmoore5556 (talk) 00:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Molly Gray

Hello! Your submission of Molly Gray at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Grady Fuson

On 19 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grady Fuson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Moneyball depicted Grady Fuson being fired by the Oakland Athletics, though in reality he left voluntarily? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grady Fuson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Grady Fuson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please made a move protection on the page of Narendra Modi

Honourable, Muboshgu I 969 Movement 2 (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC) request you to made the page of current Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi move protected. Thaking you[reply]

2020 US Senate races in Georgia

I wasn't able to undo the reverses I made. PS - Hopefully, somebody will open another RM, with a better result and/or better reading of that result. GoodDay (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GoodDay, I see. You can start another RM if you wish, but that one was just closed three days ago. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll wait. Hopefully, after a few months in 2021. Commonsense will prevail & those articles will be moved back to their correct/accurate titles. GoodDay (talk) 17:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mark Robinson (American politician)

On 22 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mark Robinson (American politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that that when he is sworn in next year, Mark Robinson will become the first Black lieutenant governor of North Carolina? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Robinson (American politician). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mark Robinson (American politician)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 00:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women's history

Hi. Thanks for all your amazing contributions! Just a quick note to share that Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's History includes contemporary women who have made history or are groundbreaking in their roles in the world. Lauren Boebert is the first woman to represent her district, that is historically significant in her community and in her district. Therefore, she qualifies for inclusion in the project. Feel free to also add Wikipedia:WikiProject Women if you'd like. As a participant in Wikipedia:Women in Red, we often add one or the other to a biography, but there is no rule saying we can't have both, too. Cheers! Missvain (talk) 20:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missvain, okay. I'll self revert. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Missvain, on further thought, is being the first woman to represent that district in Congress really historic? That seems like a stretch. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of DOJ Information from Steele Dossier

Hi, your user page says you're interested in truth but you are quick to remove it from the Steele Dossier page. Do you dispute the Department of Justice findings? Does the DOJ not meet your threshold as a source?

As posted:

The above paragraph, and assertion of conspiracy theory, is directly contradicted by the Department of Justice's Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation report published in December 2019. Among the findings from the DOJ, "the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, just days after its receipt of information from a FFG reporting that, in May 2016, during a meeting with the FFG, then-Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos 'suggested the Trump team had received some kind of suggestion from Russia that it could assist this process with the anonymous release of information during the campaign that would be damaging to Mrs. Clinton (and President Obama)... We did not find information in FBI or Department ECs, emails or other documents, or through witness testimony, indicating that any information other than the FFG information was relied upon to predicate the opening of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hefn2637 (talkcontribs) 19:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hefn2637, adding a paragraph to an article that says "the above paragraph ... is contradicted" is not how we write articles. Especially since "the above paragraph" is factual and supported by reliable sources that are WP:SECONDARY. You meanwhile use only a WP:PRIMARY source, with no context or analysis from the reliable sources, which discuss the axe the Trump/Barr DOJ has been grinding. Your addition is not helpful. For future attempts to improve the article, use the article's talk page, not mine. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Malek

You've edited Fred Malek in the past. I think the current conversation going on there could benefit from additional voices. Would you care to offer your thoughts on this? -- Pemilligan (talk) 21:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Old requests for baseball peer review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Stacy Garrity

Hello! Your submission of Stacy Garrity at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Innisfree987 (talk) 16:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All set but for the QPQ, just let me know! Innisfree987 (talk) 16:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Innisfree987, great, thanks. I owe a few QPQs so will get on that today. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Japan Series

Your help was sorely missed on 2020 Japan Series. Let's just say that I was happy that the series only went 4 games lol. Hope things are going as alright for you as much anything conceivably can in 2020 and happy holidays. --TorsodogTalk 23:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Torsodog, sorry about that. Glad it was a sweep! Things are fine, just busy and stressful and so I didn't have mental bandwidth for Japanese baseball this year. I barely had it for American baseball. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:59, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oi

Why did you delete my edit! Its on the news! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1983cakkyboy19831983 (talkcontribs) 00:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1983cakkyboy19831983, edits of a sensitive nature like that, on a biography of a living person, require reliable sources. I see none. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its all over the news! Don't you watch TV?