User talk:Deltawk

Proposed deletion of List of Advanced Placement Courses Offered by Amador Valley High School

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Advanced Placement Courses Offered by Amador Valley High School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

inappropriate content notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. UnkleFester (talk) 07:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Amador Robotics AUV Deployment.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amador Robotics AUV Deployment.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 04:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Belated reply, although this issue was resolved a few weeks ago). I've contacted the author of the image at [1], and he updated the footer of his main page releasing all images under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. Also, I managed to get OTRS verification for this picture. Deltawk (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

For your work at Amador Valley High School I think you deserve this award...

		The Schools Barnstar
		I award Deltawk this barnstar for contributions made in improving the Amador Valley High School article making it a potential GA candidate. Camaron · Christopher · talk 13:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to place it on your user page. Camaron · Christopher · talk 13:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Barnstar. This is my first wikipedia project, and I'm glad to have the page turn out so well so far. I'm happy to become familiarized with some logistics at wikipedia and be able to receive constructive comments from wikipedia's editors. Deltawk (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons issues

Just in case you have not noticed I left some messages for you on your Commons user talk page. Camaron · Christopher · talk 11:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amador Valley High School

Deltawk, I think you've done a great job with Amador Valley High School. If you just put in some mention of athletics, I'd like to make it a GA. -shirulashem^(talk) 20:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi shirulashem, thank you for your reviewing the article for GA-class and giving constructive comments on its status. I'm currently working with a friend to finish a section on athletics. I appreciate the time you and other fellow editors have given to help this article reach GA status. Deltawk (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Amador Valley High School has passed GA. Well done. -shirulashem^(talk) 19:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time spent reviewing Amador Valley High School and your welcome to Wikipedia. This is my first main wikipedia project and I'm glad to have helped promote it to GA class. Best wishes to your future GA reviews. Deltawk (talk) 22:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amador Valley High School PR, 2nd look

Hi Deltawk. I'll take another look as soon as I can and post further remarks to the article's PR page. I have some other commitments, so it might take me until late in the week to get to it. Finetooth (talk) 05:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will be happy to copyedit the article and see if I find anything "amiss", in the words of my esteemed colleague. However, I have some other commitments, so it may take me a week or so. If you don't hear from me by 1 August, please drop a reminder on my talk page. Cheers! Scartol • Tok 12:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No need to hesitate when reminding me to do what I said I would do. Sorry for the delay; it's been a hectic couple of weeks. I will get to it this weekend for sure. (If for some reason I haven't finished by Monday 10 August, please leave another note on my talk page.) Scartol • Tok 13:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't finished my review yet. Sorry about that! I've only made it about 1/3 of the way through the article. I should be able to complete my review by tomorrow, and I'll post some comments to the PR page or the article talk page. Scartol • Tok 22:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've finished my review — comments and questions are on the article talk page. Good luck with this article if/when you take it to WP:FAC! I commend you on your dedication to it. Scartol • Tok 13:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

jp07

Hello, Deltawk. You have new messages at Jp07's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi! You're on the Math Team...right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin chen2003 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am, I think I know who you are. Deltawk (talk) 01:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Korver

A tag has been placed on Paul Korver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Korver

A tag has been placed on Paul Korver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Corinne Tu

I have nominated Corinne Tu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corinne Tu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WWGB (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Deltawk. You have new messages at NuclearWarfare's talk page.
Message added 21:09, 7 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

NW (Talk) 21:09, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAC nomination removal

Deltawk, I have removed your second nomination of Amador Valley High School at FAC. Per FAC rules, there should be at least several weeks between the close of an unsuccessful nomination and its reopen. In the interim, I encourage you to engage the previous reviewers and ensure that they think their concerns were addressed. Karanacs (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you have time to review the article and make suggestions for improvement? - Deltawk (talk) 07:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, not at the moment. Other wiki-tasks have left me very little time for reviewing lately. Good luck! Karanacs (talk) 14:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

I recommend the removal of the bit about the building of the theater to some other part of the article that is more to do with culture. signing out shortly. I'll take another look in Land of Oz time! Amandajm (talk) 10:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can I suggest that you drop messages on the pages of the people who reviewed the article previously and get them to revisit it, now you've responded to the suggestions. Amandajm (talk) 10:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your comments and your support on the article! The section about the building of the theater does seem slightly out of place, but there's not really another part of the article that deals with culture. I've taken your suggestion and have left comments on the pages of those who have helped review this article in the past. - Deltawk (talk) 06:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amador Valley High School

I will take a look at it in the next day or two - thanks for the heads up, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 22:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linking images

I noticed you had trouble linking images. In the future, try [[:File:Example.png]] (with a second colon before "File"), which produces File:Example.png.

Rock on. --an odd name 01:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That's exactly the problem I had. - Deltawk (talk) 04:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict at Amador Valley High School

I'm sorry to say this, but you'll have to redo these changes. They were all lost in an edit conflict. Good news is I'm almost finished my copyedit of the references, in terms of style the article is now FA class. Ottre 00:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck my oppose - I saw the last few versions and did not check all of the diffs. Sorry for the confusion, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I see you have made the edits / changes again - I am about to call it a night here, so I will look at it tomorrow again. Just wanted to let you know the reason for the delay, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

		The Original Barnstar
		Given with respect and admiration to Deltawk for all of your hard work getting Amador Valley High School to Featured Article, while maintaining a cheerful demeanor. Well done! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Well done. Congrats. Kudos. And huzzah! Scartol • Tok 04:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I extend my congratulations to you Deltawk for getting Amador Valley High School featured status. WikiProject Schools does not have many featured article's under its belt, so you have done extraordinary service to the project. Apologies for not reviewing the article in time, I simply ran out of time last weekend, but if you need another review in the future feel free to ask. Camaron · Christopher · talk 19:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

I am probably going to be taking Amador Valley High School to FAR (Featured Article Review) some time next week. The article is not comprehensive enough IMHO. There are a couple of improvements you can make before I do that:

1. Could you modify this paragraph:

"From 1922 to 1988, the school was part of the AVJUHSD... In the late 1930s, the Amador Theater was built as part of the Amador Valley High School campus."

To say where exactly on the campus the theater was built. I would also appreciate a map of the campus.

2. Could you check that [2] and [3] are the same story?

3. Needs a list of principles. Needs a paragraph or so about the first principle in the history section, and any other principles who worked at Amador for more than 15 years.

Ottre 04:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ottre,

First of all, thank you for helping improve the court battle section of the page. I will try to address your concerns and add the information to the article that you feel necessary.

1. I have added information about where the theater was built and have also added a map of the campus
2. The articles are the same story. Is there a duplicate reference that I need to remove?
3. I will do research on principals

Deltawk (talk) 04:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ottre, thanks for your attention to the article that I worked on a bit (and that Delawk has worked on so very much). I urge you not to take this piece to WP:FAR at this time, for two important reasons:

The guidelines there state: Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content. It's been less than a month, and clearly there are no such circumstances.
Deltawk is one of the most dedicated and open-minded editors I've worked with in quite some time. He's been diligent, friendly, and very happy to incorporate others' suggestions. If you think the article needs work, I suggest putting notes on the article talk page. If they are ignored (which I'll bet money won't happen), then you can proceed to FAR.

Cheers! Scartol • Tok 11:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scartol, thank you for the support of the featured article status of Amador Valley High School. To Ottre - I do my best to be friendly and responsive to any suggestions. Like Scartol suggested, please leave any comments you have for article on its talk page and I will do my best to address them. Happy Holidays - Deltawk (talk) 01:22, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The file of the map of the school may be deleted because of fair use issues. I will see what I can do to keep or reinstate the map, or even get the map freely licensed. - Deltawk (talk) 08:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AVHSMap.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:AVHSMap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance: Amador Valley High School

This is a note to let the main editors of Amador Valley High School know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 19, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 19, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Amador Valley High School is a public high school in Pleasanton, California, a city east of San Francisco. Amador Valley is one of four high schools in the Pleasanton Unified School District, which includes Foothill High School, Village High School, and Horizon High School. The school was founded as Amador Valley Joint Union High School, from which its first class graduated in 1923. The school has been named a California Distinguished School, a National School of Character, and a National Blue Ribbon School. As of 2009, Amador Valley offers its 2,500 students 23 varsity sports, 20 Advanced Placement courses, a program to study local aquatic wildlife, and vocational training. A monthly school publication, the Amadon, reports on athletics, academic and extracurricular issues, and news of the school and community. Student groups, including the Marching Band and Math Team, have toured out-of-state after achieving high rankings in Californian competitions. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Deltawk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aliya Deri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aliya Deri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliya Deri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 11:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amador Valley High School

The achievements section needs everything sourced. Doug Weller talk 07:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback - I will add sources to the achievements section. Deltawk (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is done, the achievements paragraph within the lead is now fully sourced. Deltawk (talk) 21:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add a ping User:Doug Weller when I responded last month. Happy to address any additional comments you may have. Deltawk (talk) 04:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Korver

Thank you for creating the page Paul Korver in 2009. I am asking for your help. Someone only looking at his limited soap career has tagged the page for deletion. Please add a bold *Keep with a signature ~ ~ ~ ~, to the article's deletion discussion page [4]. Thank you Telecine Guy (talk) 01:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Horizon High School (Pleasanton, California)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Horizon High School (Pleasanton, California)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Z1720 (talk) 23:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TFA nom for Amador Valley High School

I have nominated Amador Valley High School to be today's featured article for an unspecified date. You are invited to join the discussion by clicking here. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 00:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for nominating the article. I seconded the nomination on the talk page. Deltawk (talk) 01:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amador Valley High School scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Amador Valley High School article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 20, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 20, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jim! I do not believe that the article needs any amendments, but I will keep watch on it in the interim. Deltawk (talk) 15:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deltawk. Typically, we strip out "less essential" things to create a blurb, and dated information is often one of the first things we look for to pull. Numbers that change easily, or are hard to verify, is another category of things that tend to get pulled. But we can put in anything you feel strongly about that can be supported ... does the current blurb work for you? - Dank (push to talk) 03:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dank, the current blurb does indeed work for me-thank you for improving it! Would you be able to help with one correction though (I don't think I have permissions to edit it anymore)? The school placed second in Robosub in 2022, not 2021. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/October_20,_2022 Thank you! Deltawk (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Done. - Dank (push to talk) 01:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thank you! Deltawk (talk) 01:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

whoops! that was completely my fault. i had used the year that the team placed first in the sensor optimization category, without realizing that that placement was for a different year of the competition. my apologies. thanks for catching that! dying (talk) 01:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok! There is a lot of info in that section. Deltawk (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article that kept well over the years! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Amador Valley High School

Thank you for your one quality article, Amador Valley High School, taking intensive care of it from 2009 to now, for being open for change suggestions, for improving related articles, for "I appreciate your time and your work with helping make this article FA class", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2771 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]