Jump to content

User talk:ARoseWolf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Die Fliege
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bijou1995 (talk | contribs) at 13:19, 30 May 2023 (→‎About accusations and aspersions on ANI: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Skip to top
Skip to bottom


Welcome to my Winter Wonderland!

Some general things to know about my Talk page...

  • If you write me here I will respond here. If you write me on your user talk page then please tag me there so I may respond there. If a discussion is begun in one location then please keep it there for the sake of continuity. I may move discussions to keep them in one place when they are related.
  • I will archive discussions regularly but no longer than 6 months at a time so if you don't see a particular discussion please look in my archives before alerting me.
  • I have some rules on my talk page I would appreciate being observed by everyone: be kind, be nice, and be understanding. Honesty is important and how you feel is valid but if you are upset by something I have done or said or something said here by others then please step back, take a deep breath, and approach me calmly- I'm totally willing to listen and will admit if I have made a mistake and apologize, especially, if I have offended you!
  • Sometimes it may take longer for me to reply. If a few days pass without a reply, please forgive me and send out a search and rescue team to find me. I undoubtedly fell into a hole somewhere. I will respond as soon as it is humanly possible for me to do so.
  • My talk page is regularly monitored by helpful Talk Page Watchers and Wiki-friends. They may comment or offer assistance from time to time and their presence is both wanted and appreciated. They are my guests as long as they don't eat all my cookies. :)
Please note that it is 8:57 PM (-9 UTC), where I live.
This page is best viewed using Mozilla Firefox but may cause some issues for viewers using mobile application. I am posting this statement as a courtesy for mobile users and to let them know I will work to find a solution.

Talk Page archive: 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2028

WINTER BREAK NOTIFICATION
I am on Winter break due to harsh climate and need to conserve fuel. Please continue asking questions or leaving comments. Either a talk page watcher will answer or I will when I am able to sneak on. Stay safe, keep singing and know you are loved and appreciated by me.


This Page is Watched
Wiki-Wombat is on guard.
Category:Wikipedians with a wombat on their talk page

Women in Red in December 2022

WiR Women who died in 2022
WiR Women who died in 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name,
    like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Question from Brosees (22:50, 28 November 2022)

how do i change a cover picture? --Brosees (talk) 22:50, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brosees, Cover picture? I'm not sure I understand the question. --ARoseWolf 13:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
like say if i wanna change an actor's current pic.. Brosees (talk) 22:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Brosees, okay, there are two ways of accomplishing this. The first is to upload the picture to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main Page and then add it to the article in question. The other way is to upload it directly to the Wikipedia article. Here are some links that should assist you, Help:Pictures, MOS:IMAGES, and WP:UPIMAGE. Remember: Only free licensed media may be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Fair use media will have to be uploaded directly to the article. Also you are responsible for making sure that an image is not under copyright. Failure to do so may result in the image either being removed from the article or deleted from Commons. --ARoseWolf 18:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #23

Welcome to the twenty-third newsletter from the Growth team!

Highlights

Screenshot of the positive reinforcement module improvements.

Positive reinforcement: an improved impact module to test

The goal of the Growth team is to encourage newcomers to try editing for the first time, and encourage them to keep editing. We want to increase newcomers' motivation by showing them how impactful their edits are.

Newcomers have access to an impact module; you can find yours at Special:Impact. The revised impact module provides new editors with more context about their impact. It will display the number of edits, the number of thanks received, the last time they edited, the number of consecutive days they edited, and the number of views for the articles they edited.

This module will soon be available at our pilot wikis starting December 1. You can already test this new module at Beta Wikipedia. For safety reasons, do not use your regular account and password at Beta wiki. Create a new, specific account for this wiki, with a different password.

Structured tasks: improvements based on patroller feedback

After the deployment of Structured tasks, we received feedback from various communities regarding how patrollers of recent changes were feeling overwhelmed by an increase in edits to check, and how some edits were poor quality or of poor relevance.

We made several improvements based on the feedback we received. Several points of improvement have already been addressed:

  • Patroller fatigue:
    • By default, newcomers can complete up to 25 "add a link" tasks and 25 "add an image" tasks per day. If patrollers are overburdened, each community can use Special:EditGrowthConfig to lower that limit.
  • Quality of edits: what constitutes a "quality edit" is not a well defined concept. We initiated a discussion and summarized our findings. We also worked on the following improvements:
    • Add a Link
      • Underlinked articles are now prioritized, so it's less likely that newcomers are adding links to articles that are already have a lot of links.
      • The confidence score was increased, so suggestions are more likely to be accurate.
      • The default number of suggested links per article has been lowered to 3. This can be changed at Special:EditGrowthConfig. Communities can also exclude articles containing certain templates or categories from being suggested.
    • Add an Image
      • Lists will no longer receive "add an image" suggestions.
      • Disambiguation pages will no longer receive "add an image" suggestions.
      • We have many further improvements we plan to make to "add an image" in early 2023. [1]

The Positive Reinforcement project will also address some of the concerns around encouraging newcomers to progress to higher value edits. The Growth team will soon work on strategies geared at "Leveling up" newcomers so they progress from easy to more difficult tasks.

Recent changes

  • All Wikipedias now have the same onboarding experience. Previously, at a few wikis, 20% of new accounts didn't get the Growth features when they created their account. These 20% of new accounts were used as a control group, in order to know if the Growth features were changing newcomers' behavior. Experiments have shown that Growth features improve activation and retention, and as we want to provide the same onboarding experience at all Wikipedias, we have decided to remove the control groups. We will utilize control groups when testing new features, and German Wikipedia keeps a control group at their request. [2]
  • The quality score for "add a link" suggestions will change. We will suggest less links for each article, but they will be more accurate. We will first deploy it at our pilot wikis, and then to all other wikis where this feature is available. [3][4]
  • Growth's features FAQ has been updated and expanded. This page centralizes all the information about Growth features. We invite you to read it, and, if you can, to translate it.

News for mentors

  • All Wikipedias can now setup and manage a mentorship program in an easier way.
    • We changed the process to make it more reliable, easier to improve and easier to use.
    • Wikipedias where mentorship hasn't been enabled yet can turn mentorship on following a new process. When done, mentors can sign-up by visiting Special:MentorDashboard.
    • Wikipedias where the list of mentors already existed have been converted to the new system.
    • A new special page — Special:ManageMentors — now displays the list of mentors. This page can be transcluded on any other page. There are also new processes to signup as a mentor or to quit mentorship, and we improved community mentorship management.
  • The Mentor dashboard's "Your mentees" module will have a new footer, called "Recent changes by your mentees". This footer will include a link to Recent changes, where mentors can see only edits made by their own mentees. [5]

Deployments

Improving this newsletter

We plan to have a more regular newsletter, every two months. We also want to know if the current format suits you! Let us know what you like, what you like less and your suggestions of improvements: leave us a comment, in your preferred language.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

20:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Clan mother

Asareel, thank you so much for your kind and thoughtful message. Please accept my apologies for my tardiness in replying as I was rather tired last night after a long night at work-the same is true tonight. I've see if I can make it to the library this weekend to find some sources that might be helpful. Best wishes and I hope all is well!--A.S. Brown (talk) 10:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December roses

December songs

Thank you for spreading good spirits wherever I see your name on my watchlist! Anything you could do for Debussy? I thought of you when I took a pic of roses in December. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding there. Today, we sing for a Marian feast, I learned that Yvonne Ciannella died, the soprano who impressed me in my first night at the opera, and as she died in March, sadly no Main page reverence is possible, - at least she had a good DYK, at a time when opera singers were considered interesting. I'm proud today that Christiane Hörbiger made it to that corner, and happy that we celebrate the birthday of Jean Sibelius again. - I heard an excellent concert yesterday, by Tenebrae, and a short excerpt of them singing "Deo gracias" is also linked from my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Today was a day rich in music, with two new pictures, and also rich in WP:QAI contributions on the Main page: the TFA, 2 DYK and 2 RD with members as principal editors. The church pictured there (not by me, nice snow dust and tall evergreen) comes with memories, detailed on my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:45, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Latest pics, snow even here. Today my talk has a DYK that was planned for 22 November, among the recent deaths the author of Duck, Death and the Tulip, and now a choir pic of "our" concert last Sunday, likely to become next year's lead image. Enjoy. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sshippwreck1957 (02:53, 14 December 2022)

Thank you for helping mee. It is late here and my wife has dinner ready. I will get back to editing tomorrow. Thanks again, Stuart --Sshippwreck1957 (talk) 02:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck

Hi ARoseWolf, I over read on another user talk page your plans for the Winter and I found it so fascinating and wanted to wish you well during this upcoming period. Also, you talk about "rolling the r" in your name. I for the life of me can not do this and have tried everything. My daughter does it and rubs it in my face. I truly believe it might have something to do with genetics and have always wanted to do more research on it, like it is a physical characteristic like lobed ears and being able to curl your tongue. Cheers! Malerooster (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malerooster, Thank you so much for your kind and thoughtful words. My daughter can roll r's but her father can't. She rubs it in his face too. Trust me, I do not get upset with those that simply say "Asareel" with no roll. It could be a genetic thing, I haven't ever really researched that. I grew up with a Papa that disallowed English being spoken in our home (English was a language of business only). I didn't attend public schools except for maybe one or two years. I was homeschooled by my Mama. Sometimes I didn't understand why because all of my siblings went to public schools but there were other circumstances and my parents chose to keep me from enduring those situations. I learned most everything I did from reading books. Countless hours of reading. I still do it today. I probably read three times as much as I write on Wikipedia. I do thank you so much for being a part of this community and reaching out to me. It has made my day. Keep practicing those r's. I believe you will get it eventually. The human spirit can be quite indomitable. --ARoseWolf 17:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Best wishes for the upcoming winter, and thanks for the kind words about me on Martin's talk page. Stay warm and cozy, and see you when you emerge from hibernation! --Tryptofish (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ARoseWolf: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, GenQuest "scribble" 16:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Hello ARoseWolf : Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --A.S. Brown (talk) 04:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2023

Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

From Estariel

Hi ARoseWolf,

Thank you for leaving an encouraging message on my page. I actually did run into an issue recently, having a disagreement with an editor. You can see our discussion here:

Talk:List of highest-grossing film directors# of films is not accurate

Basically I noticed that the information that they sourced is not accurate, and the source page has problems with how its tallying data and also contains some obviously wrong information. However the other user doesn't want to change anything and considers making these adjustments "original research". I don't know if I should just go ahead and make the edits myself but some of the data points on the page are just categorically wrong at this point.

Any advice would be appreciated, thank you in advance. Estariel (talk) 21:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, problem has been solved after some more back and forth. Cheers. Estariel (talk) 05:11, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2023

January songs
happy new year

colours to move forward! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

today, I point at two singers I whose performance I enjoyed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

today, less pointy: a composition from a remarkable 2022 concert, the sad record of four articles about people who recently died on the Main page at the same time, and singing for Epiphany --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Today's featured article is Osbert Parsley, not by me but Amitchell125 where I commented, including the beginning of my songs. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on vacation, - click on songs! I tell my own stories now, instead of relying on DYK. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Today's topic Elisabeth Waterhouse. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy about the pictured DYK you made with SusunW! Mine today, Elena Manistina, or: why Tchaikovsky's The Enchantress isn't on the Main page, leaves me rather unhappy, and that's my last woman on DYK, - life is too short. Under the recent deaths, I have Clytus Gottwald for whom I made a DYK in 2012. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC) back from vacation - Melitta Muszely died, RIP --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:59, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from BaltimoreHistorian (15:36, 8 January 2023)

Hey! How do I create a page for someone who has the same name as an existing Wikipedia page? And do you know if I can change the name of a page in my Sandbox after I started it? Thank you! --BaltimoreHistorian (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Let's say that the existing page is about a tennis player named "Jane Doe", and you are creating a new page about a historian also named "Jane Doe". You can call your new page "Jane Doe (historian)". Putting a descriptor in parentheses in the pagename is the standard way of doing it. If you want to be even more elegant, you can use Template:About at the top of both pages. (You can see an example of all of this at Anne Hathaway and Anne Hathaway (wife of Shakespeare).)
Changing the name of the page in your Sandbox is done by "moving" it, and there's a step-by-step guide at Help:Move. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! BaltimoreHistorian (talk) 14:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tryptofish See above, thanks from @BaltimoreHistorian. Let me add my own to that. You are amazing, Tryp! Thank you. --ARoseWolf 16:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

George Pell

There are some really damning issues with this case. One especially damning fact with child sex abuse cases is that there are no statutes of limitations. The thing that was really problematic about the statutes of limitations on this case was that it was run as a historical child sexual abuse case. The overwhelming and damning issue is the time between when the original incidents were alleged to have occurred and the amount of time it took for the cases to precede. There was a matter held in court in Ballarat. The issue with the case is clear as daylight that one of the alleged victims was already dead, that provided several issues with evidence and examination.

It also highlights a secondary issue about the case about how long in general it took to proceed. The issue as per always wasn't the strength of the case. A prosecutor rarely brings a matter to court unless there is a significant possibility that they will win that particular case. The real issue I raised above was the amount of time that had expired between when the alleged events occurred and the actual timing of the trial. Had some of the witnesses been alive, and the case been held at an earlier point where the evidence was fresh, and less time had expired in general, there may well have been an entirely different outcome. 120.22.208.169 (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for coming to my Talk page. Wikipedia policy does not allow us to add information to an article unless it is supported by reliable independent secondary sources. We are to take care in what we present to ensure it is actually supported. No original research is allowed. Wikipedia does not allow for "what if's". Adding derogatory terms in the article in Wikivoice without a supported citation to multiple reliable secondary sources is a clear violation of policy. Everything stated above is your conjecture of what occurred or may have occurred based on your following of this case and your own investigative determinations. Therefore the edit was reverted and should not be re-added under any circumstances until the criteria for inclusion is met. --ARoseWolf 16:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ARoseWolf The IP continues to reinstate their edits. An Edit War is active, as the user has violated 3RR. Just wanted to let you know. The Great Wikipedian (talk) 17:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, The Great Wikipedian, my discussion above is not in relation to the edits that are being edit warred over, specifically, but this edit in which the editor added "child molester" to the article. While it appears George Pell was initially convicted that conviction was reversed by a higher court meaning he was acquitted therefore the inclusion of the term in Wikivoice subjects Wikipedia to potential harm. Protection of the encyclopedia is paramount. --ARoseWolf 17:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Thank You. The Great Wikipedian (talk) 17:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, THAT all blew up quickly... o_O GenQuest "scribble" 20:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GenQuest, ended almost as quickly. Thankfully. --ARoseWolf 20:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Curb

content was removed as it is opinionated and not substantiated. There was also, not information on mike curb from 1973-2021. I have added content. Benson Curb (talk) 20:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Benson Curb: based on your account name, please see WP:COI. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Benson Curb: I would also encourage you to read and understand our policies on independent reliable sources WP:RS, verifiability WP:V and original research WP:OR besides what Tryp has directed you to for potential COI concerns. --ARoseWolf 20:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would love to have someone up-date if I am a conflict. Just trying to have accurate information on the site. Benson Curb (talk) 20:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Benson Curb: The proper way going forward is to suggest any changes on the articles talk page. You will see that tab at the top of the page on the article. You will need to provide reliable independent secondary sources for anything you want added to the article. It can't be anything you simply know due to any link you have with the subject. That is original research. --ARoseWolf 20:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Benson Curb, I have rolled back the edits for now because they were improperly sourced which left them unreferenced. We can't have unsourced content added to the article. Please go to the talk page (linked here) and follow the instructions found at WP:COI on how to approach asking for content to be added to the article. --ARoseWolf 20:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
there are two people that were making an up date. WE will gather information and references. The mike curb page is missing 50 years of information though.Someone will follow the guidelines to up-date. Benson Curb (talk) 21:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For anyone keeping up, a new IP has arrived on this article and is trying to "update" information using no sources. --ARoseWolf 21:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated IP vandal

Just figured I'd tell you that the repeated vandal on various IPs we just encountered is an LTA, so no need to warn them. Just report on sight. You can ask ScottishFinnishRadish for more info since they seem to have encountered them first. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I picked up on that after looking at the article history, thanks, Blaze. :-) --ARoseWolf 20:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! I don't even know how the first article i noticed them on got on my watchlist... ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was just patrolling but when I noticed they kept changing IP's I figured it was a LTA so I looked at the article history and sure enough... I asked for page protection but may not have done it correctly. I don't usually make it that far. --ARoseWolf 20:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nope you've done it right (as evidenced by the page being protected now). I typically use RedWarn along with Twinkle since RedWarn allows me to request an article to be protected which Twinkle (oddly) does not seem to have. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, I have page request ability through Twinkle. I thought about using Red Warn but figured I'd learn Twinkle good first. --ARoseWolf 20:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Huh. Alright then, guess I Just don't use Twinkle enough for that. Tbh I don't even know how it's possible for someone to change IPs that quickly. Like, I know VPNs exist but they still take about a minute to actually connect you to the server. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple devices connected at the same time maybe? --ARoseWolf 21:00, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe. I don't fully understand how IP addressing works so knowing how it works would probably help me understand how they change IPs that fast. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not familiar with this particular case, but one way that IP addresses can change rapidly is through an automatic process called "dynamic IP addresses", which is explained at IP address#IP address assignment. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IT's definitely not a dynamic IP. Multiple IPs from different ranges as well as switching between IPv4 and IPv6. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, then I agree that it's not that. Strange indeed. Maybe a mobile device being used while moving from place to place? --Tryptofish (talk) 21:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Vmkverma (03:52, 14 January 2023)

Wanted to edit the language from English to Hindi . --Vmkverma (talk) 03:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Winter

Just stopping by to say hi, and that I hope all is well in your neck of the woods. I thought this kitty, peering through green grass, could be a reminder that, eventually, warmer weather will return. Rosiestep (talk) 19:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Laura Bergt

On 27 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Laura Bergt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Laura Bergt was said to have gained millions of acres of land for Native Alaskans by Eskimo-kissing Vice President Spiro Agnew (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Laura Bergt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Laura Bergt), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 25,293 views (1,053.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friday

My turn to keep an eye on things around here

Happy Friday! Thought of you when I decided on today's cat. It's a sunny morning here; see you after the spring thaw. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023

Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name,
    married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname)

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Growth team newsletter #24

Welcome to the twenty-fourth newsletter from the Growth team!

Newcomer experience projects

The Growth team partnered with other WMF teams to conduct several experiments around increasing account creation and new editor retention. Results from four of these experiments are now available:

Newcomer tasks

  • Several communities suggested improving "add a link", by suggesting underlinked articles first. We released this change to Growth pilot wikis. We will review the data and collect feedback before considering releasing it to more wikis. [7]
  • The deployment of the "add a link" to all Wikipedias is still in progress. Suggested links use a prediction model, which has to be trained. The deployments will resume after we finish training all models. [8]

Mentorship

  • When someone wants to signup as a mentor, they are now informed if they don't meet the defined criteria. [9]
  • Workshop hosts asked us to have workshop attendees assigned to them. They can soon use a custom URL parameter. This way, workshop hosts will continue mentoring the event's attendees after the workshop. It will be available in February. [10]
  • Have you considered to help new editors on your wiki, by signing up to be a Mentor?

Other news

  • In Special:SpecialPages, Growth experiments now have their own section. [11]
  • This newsletter will have a new publication period, 6 times a year: January, March, May, July, September, November.

Translations

  • Newsletter translation: We are looking for translators for this newsletter. If you are interested and have the needed English language proficiency to assist, then please add your name to this list. You will receive an invite on your talk page to translate the newsletter when it is ready.
  • Interface translation: You can also help by translating the interface, or reviewing translations to make them more inclusive. Interface translations are hosted at translatewiki.net.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.• Help with translations

14:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Question from TheoFraser1 (10:29, 2 February 2023)

Hello, my name is Theo and I am currently working for the venture capital firm Atomico. I've set up this account to make some changes to the Atomico wikipedia page, and to our CEO's wikipedia page (Niklas Zennström), as much of the information is now outdated. I only wish to make edits to the factual information and have no interest in changing any of the language. I just wanted to declare this conflict of interest before making any edits and inform you of my intentions. If you could let me know that I am okay to proceed that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. --TheoFraser1 (talk) 10:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TheoFraser1. Please see the informational message I left on your talk page and follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure#How to disclose. ––FormalDude (talk) 10:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC) (talk page watcher)[reply]

Question from Almeida Fernando (18:48, 5 February 2023)

This is just a quick note to say hello! It is a lovely name, Asareel. It is amazing how many edits you have made since joining Wikipedia in 2020. I'm sure I'll learn a lot from you. --Almeida Fernando (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Almeida Fernando, Hello and sorry for the delay. Thank you for such a compliment about my name. It is so very nice to meet you. When I started on Wikipedia I began writing articles on a topic very close to me, you could say I was a SPA of sorts. I fell in love with this community and though I haven't written much new material since I have found more use out of helping others to write and doing work copyediting and patrolling for vandalism. If the right idea comes along I will get back into writing new articles. I would be so glad to assist you in any way that I may and I look forward to learning from you too. Remember that discussion is how consensus is found so don't forget to discuss any issues you may have with others in the community. --ARoseWolf 19:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, Asareel. I'll follow your guidance. I'm passionate about books so maybe one of these days, I'll try to find a notable book and write an article about it. Once again, great to have someone I can ask and get guidance from. Almeida Fernando (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend. If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, oh! Sounds like the mountain geeks don't have any dates for Valentine's Day. Just saying... GenQuest "scribble" 16:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
GenQuest, On my birthday too. :) --ARoseWolf 15:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February songs

February songs
my daily stories

yesterday's cantata, 300 years later --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

... and today a book, Alte Liebe, for Valentine --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

... and today the regional festival - DYK of 13 years ago ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Jonfitzgerald82 (12:25, 10 February 2023)

My page for Devine Evans keeps getting rejected for publication. They say I need more references but the page is very similar to Adam Blackstone page. I would like your advice. --Jonfitzgerald82 (talk) 12:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jonfitzgerald82, Devine may very well be notable but the three sources you have for your draft are Tv Guide, a personal website and Billboard. That's not convincing. We need significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Significant coverage is often very subjective but I always tend to look at it in saying if they are a focus of the source then they are mostly likely being significantly covered. Be careful using primary, meaning closely linked to the subject of the article you writing about, sources. They can not be used in proving notability. With the AfC process the reviewer is only evaluating the draft based on the sources presented. You may find articles included in Wikipedia that are poorly or inadequately sourced but that should never be the rule and those articles will eventually be contested and possibly deleted. Keep working on it and find better sources to prove notability. --ARoseWolf 14:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Question from Bought the Store (01:17, 15 February 2023)

thanx! I am just looking around. Maybe I will be able to contribute to an article someday... --Bought the Store (talk) 01:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bought the Store, let me know if there is anything further I can do to assist you and welcome! --ARoseWolf 19:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Our2050World (21:53, 17 February 2023)

Hello, it’s great to have a mentor! I am hoping to introduce a split of net zero from the carbon neutrality article. I am building up the material to create a sandbox for net zero and will look to propose the changes that need to be made to the CN article for it to remain. Do you have any top tips on how to go about doing this most effectively? Thank you! --Our2050World (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our2050World, I will leave some tips on your talk page. As for splitting articles, let me know when you have it complete and I'll take a look. I love to read anyway. Welcome and I'm glad to be your mentor. :) --ARoseWolf 19:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2023

Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine!
    Include something to keep people reading.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

how to edit some pages about political figures

Dear mentor

hi i am haithm. from Sana'a [sˤɑnʕaːʔ], i am researching on enriching wikipedia contents in arabic language, specially about public/political figures, in arab countries and in my country that never mentioned, which they are lots of them, they change the history of arab world, or my country, and most of people knowthem. but because of they lived in tens of decades ago. no articles, press, videos, or blogs, ever mentioned them by may be we can found old newspaper mentioned them, or a book published by them. a vintage personal portraits show him.

My question

how can i publish an article that is comply with wikipedia policies of people change a history, and mosly known by many. but no urls or articles or press talked about them?

is there any other validity proofs in order to publish a valid page or an article in wikipedia?

please accepet my appreciats in advance :-) Haithmgarallah (talk) 00:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the delayed response, Haithmgarallah. Weather and responsibilities outside Wikipedia are the cause for the delay. Let me begin by welcoming you to Wikipedia and to state that I hope you will be able to find your niche here. I also wanted to state that I believe it is wonderful that you followed your passions here to Wikipedia and want to attempt to translate those to improving the encyclopedia. I will attempt to help you avoid many of the pitfalls that new editors experience on their journey here. Let's begin.
I am not an expert on the Arabic language but I am a student of language, both spoken and unspoken. That being said I do want t caution you that dealing with politics is a difficult path here on the encyclopedia, especially local or regional politics. It is especially important that you back up every claim or statement with reliable sources.
That brings me to the next subject, sourcing. Sources are not required to be online and you may use old newspapers but those newspapers must be available somewhere for review, whether in a library or excerpts from a book. There must be a means, even if it is not easily accessible or is behind a pay wall, of verification. In short, Wikipedia does not care what most people know. It does not matter what you or I know, unless it is stated, confirmed and verified in reliable sources.
I know it can be difficult to understand how or why the encyclopedia operates this way, especially when we know something is true. While there may be absolute truths out there remember that at one time in recorded human history very smart people believed the earth was flat. What we see as truth may not be so clearly evident to others and it may simply be perspective that alters how we view something. This is why Wikipedia requires independent reliable sources. We are not saying that what is written is absolute truth. We are saying that what is written is what reliable sources say is the truth.
Nothing will ever be able to take away the accomplishments of so many of these historical figures within the Arab world but without those reliable sources giving it significant coverage it can not be included on Wikipedia. The only valid proof allowed is the reliable source itself.
I very much appreciate you being here and a part of this community. Thank you for bringing your question to my talk page. I will be leaving a welcome message on yours with helpful tips and links to important information about editing. --ARoseWolf 15:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March stories

March songs
my women's day story

I remember a 2016 DYK on IWD, Hana Blažíková, a Czech who sang German music in Japan. Girls and women sang how Bach arranged Pergolesi's Stabat Mater to a new text paraphrasing Psalm 51, last Sunday. - I loved improving Mary Bauermeister - on the Main page until yesterday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marek Kopelent died, and it's Saint Patrick's Day --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

today we remember the 150th birthday of Max Reger, who saw the horrors of a world war right when it began in 1914, while others were still in high patriotic moods --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sharing impressions from vacation on Madeira 20-30 March, pics now at 24 Mar from the peaks --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Macfeegles (05:36, 9 March 2023)

Hello, new to editing, so hope you can help. I have been trying to upload an image, originally created in xcel, then followed the instructions about how to prepare it, but when I finally went through the process of adding it to WP, it just comes back and says NO, but no hints of why. At a loss ... --Macfeegles (talk) 05:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Macfeegles and welcome to Wikipedia. I honestly can not directly answer your question so I have posted it to the Teahouse where I am a host and where very knowledgeable editors volunteer their time to answer questions. I feel this is the best place to ask. I have pinged you there. I will also leave a welcome message and some helpful tips for you on your talk page. Please do not hesitate to ask further questions should you have them. If I do not know the answer then I will try to get the answer for you. --ARoseWolf 13:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Sonofman23 (10:51, 9 March 2023)

Thank you. I’ve used Wikipedia often as a resource and would like to contribute my studies and interests in to pages.

What are the most effective learning tools and resources that would allow me to do so in the proper formatting with minimal effort. I want to ensure when i publish I take great care to respect the efforts of all those who’ve complied such a beautiful living wiki --Sonofman23 (talk) 10:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By doing things like grammar and spellcheck. Off to a roaring start! Sonofman23 (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Topics for the curious minded

As a preface, I am a very blunt thinker and talker. I’m open to debate and criticism of mine or others works because right and wrong doesn’t equate in subjects I dig in to and ask questions about. They are honest in their effort to explore a thought, question, topic or subject to its most objectively truthful end, regardless of popular opinion ot bias or the collective consciousness of the moment. That said I am not one to make a habit of using a platform in a manner for which it is unintended. Ghandi has rightly judged that “even in a minority of one, the truth is the truth.” What is wikipedias general stance on a research page surrounding topics that could be considered sensitive if presented in a neutral and informative format with links for back-up etc? Sonofman23 (talk) 10:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sonofman23, the world is full of philosophers and thinkers. In regards to Wikipedia, "truth" is believed to be in the eye of the beholder and therefore is not as important as accuracy to sources. We report what sources say in a neutral way, not meaning that every article is neutral in its content. We do not create a false sense of balance. If the coverage of a notable subject is overwhelmingly negative then how could the content within Wikipedia's article on that subject not be equally negative if reported accurately. We do not project our own thoughts into articles though you will see this often displayed on talk pages and in discussions so long as it doesn't violate a policy. We are expected to edit articles dispassionately even though we may be very passionate about the subjects we edit. --ARoseWolf 15:57, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Muhusin tech tv (17:21, 16 March 2023)

hello --Muhusin tech tv (talk) 17:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Muhusin tech tv, is there something I can assist you with? --ARoseWolf 19:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So happy...

borderless
borderless

... that you're back. Rosiestep (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shawnee, Cheraw, new accts, & IPs

Truong Gia Bao112 (talk · contribs) and Hidgggf (talk · contribs)

Now that the semi-protects have expired on a few of these pages it seems we will now be dealing with the former IPs in new incarnations as these two accounts. Almost definitely one was created to sock for the other (as one of the first edits of Hidgggf was a test edit made to the talk page of the other [12]).

They still don't use sources, just like when they edited as IPs, and other than malformed edit requests to article talk pages when they were semiprotected, have not made any talk page comments in discussion of their edits. Where do we go from here? Do we ask for another round of semi-protects, and expand to other articles such as Mohawk people and Banda Oriental, which they have now expanded their attention to? Do we ask for blocks? They seem well meaning enough, I think, they just refuse to abide by WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:VERIFY and discuss at talk.

But four months of reverting nearly identical uncited additions is reaching the "enough is enough" territory. Thoughts? Heiro 14:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heironymous Rowe, I agree though I don't know what the answer is other than staying vigilant. I noticed Truong made just enough edits to possibly get autoconfirmed so they could make edits to the article if it is protected. It might be worth opening a SPI but is there enough evidence to go on to prove anything? I don't know and I'm not inclined to assume anything without clear evidence or make those assumptions public even if I did. AGF and all that. --ARoseWolf 11:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was pretty much what I thought as well, I was just hoping maybe you had some other ideas that weren't occuring to me, lol. At first I was thinking an SPI might help, but they only used the Hidgggf acct for a few days and have consistently used the other since. On behavioral, articles edited, and the cross acct talk page editing alone I think it passes duck. But I get the feeling the most that would happen with a filing is that it would be blocked as a sock and they'd get told to stick to the one acct. It might be better to leave it alone for now, and if they switch back to it in future it would be grounds for an SPI filing. If they do another round of uncited additions, we should probably do some explicit talk page explanations of why their edits aren't working. And then ask for block if they continue to not respond. Communication is required. Cheers, Heiro 12:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Heironymous Rowe, Agreed. Every attempt should be made to communicate. --ARoseWolf 13:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's BS!

Native American contributor

The Native American Barnstar is given to the users who contribute cited and balanced content toward articles regarding the Indigenous peoples of the Americas. Thank you for your contributions! GenQuest "scribble" 04:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2023

Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Question from Luanda lozano (19:12, 30 March 2023)

I am an artist and would like to have a page with my bio and credentials --Luanda lozano (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luanda lozano, unfortunately, that is not what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. When you become famous as an artist, someone will write an article here about you. In the meantime, Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. Hope that helps, GenQuest "scribble" 12:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #25

Welcome to the twenty-fifth newsletter from the Growth team! Help with translations

Celebrations

Leveling up release

5,000+ images added via the newcomer task in February

  • In February 2023, 5,035 images were added via the newcomer “add an image” feature (on all wikis where available); 155 were reverted.
  • Since the feature “add an image” was launched: 36,803 images have been added; 2,957 images were reverted.

Recent changes

  • Add a link
    • Community Ambassadors completed an initial evaluation that confirmed that prioritizing underlinked articles resulted in better article suggestions. We then evaluated the change on Growth pilot wikis, and results suggest that more newcomers are successfully completing the task and experiencing fewer reverts. We have now deployed the new prioritization model to all wikis with "add a link" enabled. [13][14]
    • We continue the deployment of "add a link" to more wikis. These changes are regularly announced in Tech News. To know if newcomers at your wiki have access to this feature, please visit your Homepage.
  • The Impact module was deployed on our pilot wikis, where we conducted an A/B test. We published initial findings, and a data scientist is now completing experiment analysis. [15]
  • Donor Thank you page experiment – Donors land on a “thank you” page after donation, and that landing page now includes a call to action to try editing: Example Thank you page in French. This promising feature is tested at several Wikipedias (French Wikipedia, Italian Wikipedia, Japanese Wikipedia, Dutch Wikipedia, Swedish Wikipedia).
  • Growth features are now the default experience on both test.wikipedia.org and test2.wikipedia.org. You can test our features there.

Upcoming work

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

13:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

April songs

April songs
my story today

My story today is about the Alchymic Quartet, - I went away from DYK but it's the last one from last year. - The songs are about vacation, continued. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I loved to see Marian Anderson and her story of protest against discrimination by singing on Easter Sunday 9 April 1939 on the Main page yesterday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My story today, Messiah (Handel), was my first dip into the FA ocean, thanks to great colleagues. - a few pics added, one day missing --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for article improvements in April! - Today is the 80th birthday of John Eliot Gardiner. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Getmekrishna (06:47, 6 April 2023)

Hello --Getmekrishna (talk) 06:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getmekrishna, greetings, is there something I can help you with? --ARoseWolf 13:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I am a new user. I have created a content in sandbox today .How can I publish it ? Getmekrishna (talk) 18:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) @Getmekrishna: I have added a draft template to your sandbox which has a button to submit it for review. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Blaze,
How I can I change my draft Title? Now it is showing my user name . Getmekrishna (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can just move it to Draft space which would've been done by a reviewer anyway. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Getmekrishna: Just submit to for review if you think it's ready as that will give me a button to move it to draftspace under the right title. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from LokenAkhanteros (23:53, 10 April 2023)

Hey, I ran into some copyright issues with a photo I uploaded to Wikimedia. I'm trying to contact the copyright holder, but I'm new to the process and I want to make sure that I give them the right information to make sure that the query is handled appropriately. Is there any way you could proofread the email I'm sending them? --LokenAkhanteros (talk) 23:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LokenAkhanteros, so long as it does not contain personal information of either yourself or the copyright holder you may post what you wish to send them here and let myself or possibly one of my Talk page watchers to proofread it and offer advice. --ARoseWolf 15:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Native American article

Hi ARoseWolf, I hope you are well. I am undertaking an article on White Antelope, a Cheyenne chief in the 1800s, perhaps best known for his death song at the Sand Creek massacre: "nothing lives long . . . only the earth and mountains". I know the Cheyenne are very different from the Cherokee, but I thought you might be able to catch some of the mistakes I will no doubt make. This is a very sad article to write, and I want to get the tone and coverage right. I was wondering if you would be interested in offering some feedback on the article once I finish the draft? Let me know, and no worries if not Eddie891 Talk Work 02:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've drafted it at User:Eddie891/White Antelope Eddie891 Talk Work 13:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eddie891, I apologize for the delayed response. You mentioned Cherokee in the article but shouldn't be about the Cheyenne? "Relations between the Cherokee and white Americans living on the Great Plains declined during the 1860s, as many Cherokee refused to move to the reservation and instead attempted to remain on their traditional buffalo hunting lands. With the outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861, more soldiers were stained in Colorado. In 1864, John Chivington led the First Regiment of Colorado Volunteers began killing, according to historian Stan Hoig, any and all Cheyenne they came upon, ostensibly as a form of retaliation for reported theft of livestock. Several Cherokee settlements were completely destroyed." --ARoseWolf 14:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're completely right-- I've replaced those four. *facepalming* this is why I should write when more fully awake. I was reading about the Cherokee right before writing that section, I think, and my brain just stopped working. Apologies. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eddie891, You don't have to apologize, it's completely understandable and why this being a community driven project is so beautiful. I do make a practice not to edit articles myself when other editors are actively editing unless there is a process by which each editor knows the other is currently editing. @GenQuest and I did this on the article Historic Cherokee settlements and its just great practice in etiquette so I will continue looking over the article and if I see minor grammatical or punctuation issues I may do those but for bigger edits I will just put them here and let you make the edits. --ARoseWolf 14:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Gertrud2214 (09:56, 26 April 2023)

Hi Azareel, I want to make substantial edits and additions to a Wikipedia article about my father, Klaus Werner Wedell, who died recently. The current Wikipedia entry is very sketchy, contains multiple inaccuracies, and the headings are confused - eg 'career' contains info about his early life and is followed by a heading 'work'. I've prepared a section on Klaus's early life, citing publicly verifiable independent sources. What should I do now? - is the best thing to make the edits on Wikipedia directly, or send it to you to check that we've understood the Wikipedia citations policy correctly? Thanks! Gertrud2214 --Gertrud2214 (talk) 09:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I should add - I've prepared the section on Klaus's early life to start off with, to make sure that we're doing the citations right. I've also prepared a section for Wikipedia entitled 'career' - editing and adding to what is already there - and a section entitled 'key ideas' (he had a career as an educational psychologist spanning 50 years). If you have any advice on the appropriateness of these headings, please let me know. Thanks! Gertrud2214 (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2023

Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About your userpage

Okay, this is a really small thing but your userpage is so pretty and easy on the eyes =w= EastBlowingGale (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May songs
my story today

I agree! - I had a good story on coronation day: a Te Deum we sang that day. And the following day we sang it for the composer ;) - And today we remember a composer who created music especially for us! -- (oops forgot to sign 9 May) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

more pleasant music - just heard! - if you click on songs - did you know a string quartet with two cellos? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the same! The words you've written are beautiful too – would you mind if I quoted you on my userpage (specifically, "Our goal and every Wikipedian's goal should be to leave this encyclopedia more improved, through civil collaboration, than when we came here. Building the community aids us in those efforts")? Perfect4th (talk) 08:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect4th, I'm honored you would consider that. Anything I put on my user page is free to reuse. A lot of it is borrowed from other user's or experiences I've had in life that I reflect on. --ARoseWolf 13:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See this

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America#You're in the news. Doug Weller talk 17:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller, I thought about just responding to your email. I truly appreciate you keeping me informed as it could be long periods of time before I am able to get on here.
I do not want to turn this into a forum of grievances or a discussion about behaviors, the merit of arguments or even one where solutions are proposed. I will however leave you and anyone looking at this with my feelings concerning this and other debates on Indigenous topics.
Every discussion is like fighting a war, with both those on the project and those outside the project. I refuse to fight any further. When discussion began on Talk:Andrew Jackson concerning an AfC to change wording in the lead I stood with others. As differing opinions changed the flow and direction of the discussion and a consensus was becoming less and less of a sure thing all of these others left the discussion and I found myself almost standing alone for change. It was as if they realized they weren't going to get everything they wanted so they just stopped. I persevered because some change is better than no change. The revisit of FA/GA status of the article was the catalyst to operate with to see those changes come to pass. I refused to edit the article myself and allowed the process to work itself out through collaboration with others on the talk page and it was a great success. In the end, it isn't perfect but did any of those others care? Nope. All there is are complaints about its failures and dismissal of the countless hours spent in discussion to get some change brought about. News articles written that disparage and dismiss the progress made and only highlight what is perceived to still be missing.
Then there was the discussion on Talk:Trail of Tears regarding adding the term "genocide" (placed in parenthesis to emphasize the term) within the infobox. I was not objectionable to the addition of the term, in fact I support it 100%. I did, perhaps out of exhaustion from the Andrew Jackson discussion that had basically wound down by that point and from the continued discussion on that talk page, make the suggestion to include "cultural genocide" if "genocide" wasn't agreeable. An edit war ensued between multiple editors who battled with words through edit summary. I started a new section calling for civility and an end to the edit war. Instead of appreciation for the call to civility it instead gets implied I am trying to own the article and that my actions may inhibit editors from making edits to the article. As I explained my purpose it was ignored completely and then, in this section that had nothing to do with the "genocide" topic, my desire for some change to the article becomes a reason to attack my attempt as irrelevant, dismissive of the deaths of my ancestors and wholly unfounded. Mind you, there is a section in the article itself in which Indigenous academics discussed and put forward the term "cultural and physical genocide" in their writings. I was attempting to find compromise to affect some change in a more balanced direction, if the other did not find consensus, that was met by attacks and then a denial of intent by those involved. I admit that tone is sometimes lost in text but a pattern of text can offer a person the ability to detect tone.
This, among other reasons, is why I will not participate in any discussions related to Indigenous topics going forward for the foreseeable future. I sincerely wish nothing but the best to those who try and I have nothing but the upmost respect for everyone commenting on the project page about changes that are needed. There are heroes among them standing up against injustice that I admire and respect greatly. --ARoseWolf 18:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Whew, what an unpleasant experience. Sorry that happened to you. Have you seen the Adrienne Mayor video I added to the Wikiproject talk page? Doug Weller talk 20:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Weller, I have not watched the video but I will. Again, it was unpleasant from my perspective and thus my need to back off from those topics at this time. I do not want to engage with the other editors or worsen the issues either of us experienced in that discussion. My point for being on Wikipedia is not to cause or be subject to additional stresses though some are expected. I admire the courage of many to speak up and share their perspectives and I would never want to dismiss them or their experiences nor do I want to even remotely suggest it as irrelevant. The experiences of others along with my own guide me on my daily journey and each experience is highly regarded and respected as relevant. I truly and genuinely appreciate every perspective. I also fiercely defend the relevance of my own in discussion but can allow for the fact that my emotional state within any given moment can affect my that perspective. I should be willing to listen more, a challenge my Papa gave me when I was much younger and I still sometimes fail at. --ARoseWolf 20:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It can be difficult. Anyway, I think you'll enjoy the video. She's great. Doug Weller talk 07:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, ARoseWolf. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 15:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notification

Hello ARoseWolf:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About accusations and aspersions on ANI

Hi, A RoseWolf. I was a little surprised to see your response to Bijou1995 on ANI. You advised people who think the user is a sock to open an SPI "rather than make accusations and cast aspersions". Opening an SPI is good advice, but you appear to not have noticed the mass of accusations, aspersions, assumptions of bad faith, and personal attacks coming from Bijou1995, mostly against a named user, just above your post. I've quoted some of them here, and also warned Bijou1995 on their page. You're of course a pretty experienced editor, so I wouldn't have expected you to ignore their bad behaviour and merely commiserate with them about the vendetta they think another editor has, and about their good heart. Are you sure you're on the side of the angels here? Bishonen | tålk 15:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC).[reply]

I looked at it, and it does look like a mistake on ARoseWolf's part. On the other hand, it looks like a mistake made with good intentions. I tried reading the OP superficially, treating it as tl;dr, and it superficially comes across like an inexperienced and somewhat inept user who has hurt feelings – although if I then read it the way I normally would read such a thing in a dispute, it raises numerous red flags for me. ARoseWolf, I think if you take a second look, that user looks like bad news. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wow another insult, inept user, bad news? I really can't see what I have done wrong here. I admit I am not experienced at Wiki but I am trying to learn. I have been accused of lying about my illnesses, my faith and my intentions. I would like to prove my authenticity. I have had about five editors attack me but that's appears to be ok, whilst my humble investigation is threatened with being blocked, I feel like Im going to get blocked for replying and I need Wikipedia as I cannot work due to my disabilities, wiki helps me feel connected. So I apologise for offending anyone but I felt I was doing the right thing. Bijou1995 (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are you familiar with the concept "non-apology apology", Bijou1995? That's what you have written above. (I really can't see what I have done wrong here... I apologise for offending anyone but I felt I was doing the right thing.) We have an article on it. Bishonen | tålk 11:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC).[reply]
No I am not familiar and what I wrote is what I feel, isn't is called justifying yourself. I notice nobody has referred to my disabilities being questioned or that I have practically been called a liar, I guess there's no policy on that Bijou1995 (talk) 13:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also I did everything correctly, I went on their talk page and then took it to the right dept. I listed my thoughts and previous editors thoughts which I made clear were not mine just to help others get an idea rather than having to trawl though wiki themselves. As for the mass of accusations on my part, I was merely asking if these things were possible from that editor and I made it clear why. I cannot understand why all this has turned on me when I thought I was doing the right thing. I feel bullied! Bijou1995 (talk) 13:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Growth team newsletter #26

Welcome to the twenty-sixth newsletter from the Growth team! Help with translations

One million Suggested Edits

We passed the 1 million Suggested edits milestone in late April!

  • The Suggested edits feature (AKA Newcomer tasks) increase newcomer activation by ~12%, which flows on through to increased retention. (source)
  • Suggested edits increase the number of edits newcomers complete in their first two weeks and have a relatively low revert rate. (source)
  • Suggested edits are available on all Wikipedia language editions.
  • Newer Suggested edits, like Add a link and Add an image, aren’t yet deployed to all wikis, but these structured tasks further increase the probability that newcomers will make their first edit. (source)

Positive reinforcement

Positive reinforcement aims to encourage newcomers who have visited our homepage and tried Growth features to keep editing.

  • The new Impact module was released to Growth pilot wikis in December 2022, and we are now scaling the feature to another ten wikis. [20]
  • The Leveling up features are deployed at our pilot wikis.
  • The Personalized praise features were deployed at our pilot wikis on May 24. Mentors at pilot wikis will start to receive notifications weekly when they have “praise-worthy” mentees. Mentors can configure their notification preferences or disable these notifications.

Add an image

Other updates

What's next for Growth?

  • We shared an overview of Growth annual planning ideas, and have started community discussion about these potential projects. We would love to hear your feedback on these ideas!

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:14, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Translation request

Hi. Sorry to bother you but I would like to ask you whether you could please translate this to Yiddish?

Lingua Franca Nova (“Elefen”) is a language designed to be particularly simple, consistent, and easy to learn for international communications. It has a number of positive qualities:
1. It has a limited number of phonemes. It sounds similar to Italian or Spanish.
2. It is phonetically spelled. No child should have to spend years learning irregularities.
3. It has a completely regular grammar, similar to the world’s creoles.
4. It has a limited and completely regular set of productive affixes for routine word derivation.
5. It has well-defined rules for word order, in keeping with many major languages.
6. Its vocabulary is strongly rooted in modern Romance languages. These languages are themselves widespread and influential, plus they have contributed the major part of English vocabulary
7. It is designed to be naturally accepting of Latin and Greek technical neologisms, the de facto “world standard”.
8. It is designed to seem relatively “natural” to those who are familiar with Romance languages, without being any more difficult for others to learn.
We hope you like Elefen!

Thanks for your help. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 06:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ARoseWolf&oldid=1157709885"