Welcome to the humanities section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.

Select a section:

WP:RD/H

Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

How can I get my question answered?

Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.

Ready? Ask a new question!

How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.

December 7

Palace of Versailles

Louis XVIII and Charles X wanted to restore it as the royal court, but they couldn't because the prices were too high. Louis-Philippe I restored it, but only as a museum. Henry V had in his political program to re-use it as the old court? -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.239.131.190 (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Henry V" is more usually known as Henri, Count of Chambord. I'm not sure whether you're asking a question... AnonMoos (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The question may be whether Henri would have restored the Palace of Versailles as the royal court had he acceded in 1870. Couldn't find anything except that he chose a house in Versailles for his lodgings in France while the matter of his restoration was debated. [1] Alansplodge (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, closed. 95.239.131.190 (talk) 16:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 30, 1789

What were the names of the fourteen gardes françaises who were delivered by the mob from the Prison de l'Abbaye that day? Why they returden in prison on July 6 and were pardoned by the King? Who was the commander of that prison in that period? Were they later part of guard ammunition in July 12-14? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.239.131.190 (talk) 10:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Revolutionary Temper: Paris, 1748-1789 amd A People's History of the French Revolution both say that there were 11 soldiers. I couldn't fnd any source for their names. Presumably they were pardoned in an effort to appease the rioters, but again, no sources that I can see.

By "guard ammunition in July 12-14" perhaps you mean the Storming of the Bastille? It seems unlikely that the same soldiers were involved, since the garde bourgeoise had only been formed the day before and was composed of civilians rather than trained soldiers. Alansplodge (talk) 15:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the Gardes françaises disertion in July 12, when the fight against the Royal-Allemand, and their part in the Storming of the Bastille. About the prison commander? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.239.131.190 (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From various sources there is a number of eleven gardes françaises freed from the Abbey prison. There might have been more information in a royal decree of amnesty on them, but it doesn't seem to be found in the usual places. Even the registers (in Versailles) of the regiment are mostly unavailable [2]. It's known that they ( the eleven) were aminstied after a request to Louis XVI from a delegation to Versailles by the freshly established "Electeurs de Paris" (the Electors of Paris [3]), an assembly made of burghers contributing the realm from 300F annually. --Askedonty (talk) 15:47, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. Can you find the name of the royal commander of the Abbaye prison, so it's closed? 95.239.131.190 (talk) 16:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why, I think you may need to know whether their return to prison was a condition for their being granted pardon and whether the King maybe lost some precious time in more usefull consultations (the Electors's delegation was on July 4 I think) --Askedonty (talk) 16:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more interested in the commander of the prison. 95.239.131.190 (talk) 16:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In 1791 it's a Messeuir Baillon ( also commander of the Saint Germain Bataillon ) Décret 1791 . I'm keeping looking back in time. --Askedonty (talk) 16:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I meant the royal commander in June 30, 1789, during the mob attack. 79.54.234.109 (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, looking into it - I think it must be the same however. Baillon full military command is that of the bataillon des gardes nationaux de l'Abbaye Saint Germain Souvenirs_de_la_princesse_de_Tarente but the unit is also the 3rd Bataillon of Nassau Regiment (96th Infantry Regiment (France)) --Askedonty (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, since it was a royal military prison until June 30, 1789, when it was expugned and passed under the rebels' total control. 79.54.234.109 (talk) 17:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll need to see some solid good sources if I'm ever to acknowledge that. Only nine of the eleven guards chose taking the leave at that occasion, the other two must have thought they would not do it. Six other held soldiers and officers went also with it however. You are probably thinking about the resignation of the duc du Châtelet and the other officers of the Gardes Françaises, but that's only after the 14th. --Askedonty (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the royal commandant, you can search sites about the military organization of the ancien regime in 1789. 193.207.212.224 (talk) 21:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I have for now is not absolutely conclusive. First to be noted the Abbaye prison is not precisely a fortress, and absolutely not comparable to the famous Bastille fortress. Looking at the Gardes Française operation style (Le spectateur militaire) there is not a senior officer in residence in that three stories city building. Le Héraut de la Nation (The Herald) is not a highly reliable source but a very comtemporaneous one and confirms Le Spectateur in that you would have to be calling it to the colonel for any other than a very trivial request. In my opinion the commander in title was the colonel of the Gardes (regarding "the Herald" they are mentioning famously feared "Dragoons" as the potential preventers when the crowd was moving back, other ulterior sources having two entire named regimental units swiftly tamed with offerings of crude red wine instead, so where is the truth). --Askedonty (talk) 22:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, closed. 193.207.212.224 (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hitler's successor as Führer?

Were there ever any plans about, if Nazi Germany had continued to exist after Adolf Hitler's death, who would have succeeded him as Führer of Germany? JIP | Talk 10:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Dönitz did succeed him. --Wrongfilter (talk) 11:31, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was a bit of a last minute decision though. Since 1939, Hermann Göring was the designated successor to Hitler, but he messed it all up in 1945 by sending the Göring Telegram asking for an early takeover, which upset the boss no end. Heinrich Himmler was next in line, but the BBC broadcast details of his attempts to broker a peace deal through the Swiss at about the same time as Göring's telegram, leading Hitler to make a will naming Dönitz, who was a loyalist but not a party activist, so a bit of an outsider. All this was one day before Hitler's suicide.

Considering that Hitler aimed to found an empire that would endure for a millennium, he doesn't seem to have thought of any sort of hereditary dynasty; rather he believed in Social Darwinism, whereby the strongest and most capable man would rise to the top regardless of status of birth. Alansplodge (talk) 14:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As most YouTube viewers will know, Eva's brother-in-law was never gonna get the gig. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of dictators don't have formally and publicly-designated successors, since such a person would naturally become an alternative power center by attract support from opportunistic individuals ingratiating themselves with the future ruler. (Similar to the Hanoverian dynasty in Britain in the 18th-century, where the heir to the throne / Prince of Wales was usually involved in the political opposition.) Lenin and Stalin didn't have one when they died. AnonMoos (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A counter-example is the Kim family of North Korea, who have successfully perpetuated their regime through imheritance. A less successful example was Francisco Franco who carefully groomed Juan Carlos to takeover his Fascist regime and simultaneously restore the Spanish monarchy, but it backfired because the first thing the new king did was announce a democratic election. Alansplodge (talk) 15:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good thing for Juan Carlos that after he made that decision, Franco remained dead. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In 1658, Oliver Cromwell was succeeded by his son Richard. That didn't last long. In 1968, the president of Portugal transferred power from António de Oliveira Salazar to Marcelo Caetano. Then there was a revolution...2A00:23C7:9CD1:3901:7762:1B1D:468A:BF09 (talk) 12:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salazar never married or had children. That may explain why (a) he didn't bestow the presidency on his son, and (b) why he held on to power for so long (36 years). -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 17:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolae Ceaușescu's youngest son, Nicu Ceaușescu, was in line to inherit the dictatorship, despite being an alcoholic and gambling addict. His eldest son Valentin must have been thought to lack the credentials of a tyrant as he was only put in charge of a football club.

Also Qusay Hussein who was being lined up to take the reins from Saddam, in preference to his playboy older brother Uday.

And finally Bashar al-Assad, who in 1994 was recalled from studies at an eye hospital in London to learn how to be a dictator after his older brother was killed in a car crash, eventually stepping into the shoes of his father Hafiz al-Assad, on the latter's death in 2000. Alansplodge (talk) 17:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opthalmology's loss.... I guess. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Alansplodge (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help

From their own pages it's very clear, but can you help me to find a confirm that Charles Eugene, Prince of Lambesc and Henri Louis, Prince of Guéméné were absolutists, loyal to the ancien régime until their death? Thank you. -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.239.131.190 (talk) 12:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've already find it myself. Closed. 82.54.238.145 (talk) 12:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for the article on Jaxa (state)

Jaxa has three citations. All appear to be obscure (to an American, I dunno if they're obscure in Poland) Polish sources. (At first I thought it was a hoax; it's not, I "verified" it's real with the help of Google books snippets and Google translate) I was wondering, since it appears to have a fascinating history, if anyone can help with English-language sources about it. Or non-English sources they can translate, for that matter. Thank you, 73.117.187.149 (talk) 16:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is, supposably, a good source published under the Polish Studies At Macquarie University, Sydney 1989, by one Stanisław Lukas entitled simply Jaksa, but it's very difficult to come by. --Ouro (blah blah) 17:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A brief mention in English is found here in footnote 57. --Lambiam 10:10, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

École militaire

The governator was Marquis Jean-Baptiste-César de Timbrune de Valence (1719-?). Can you help me to find his death date? Moreover, I once read that, when Napoleon was a cadet, that military school revered the Prince of Condé? Can you search a confirm? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.54.234.109 (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This just says "Deceased after 1793". This says "ca. [i.e circa] 1793". So it would seem to be unrecorded. Alansplodge (talk) 12:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but since he was escaped in Spain you can search here. And about Condé? 82.54.238.145 (talk) 12:43, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With Condé you're probably referring to Louis II de Bourbon. ~~But how would they've not?~~ --Askedonty (talk) 13:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, he was surely the paternal grandfather of Duc of Enghien. 193.207.101.121 (talk) 14:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Louis was himself still only Duc of Enghien when aged 23 he led the French to a great victory against the terrible imperial forces at Rocroi: 19 mai 1643. His eulogy by Bossuet must have been read aloud for more than decades and repeated in military schools and by private educators in the private homes of the aristocracy. I wouldn't even be sure that the College Louis le Grand was not named after him, if a were a young middle class Parisian I guess. --Askedonty (talk) 14:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Decides to Fingerprint European Travelers

I found this Deutsche Welle [4] article from nearly 20 years ago. It is about a proposed fingerprinting policy.

Did this policy ever get implemented?

Does this policy continue to the present day?

I searched the Visa policy of the United States and Visa Waiver Program articles and found nothing relevant.

I tried googling, but most results are about the new 2023 EU proposal to fingerprint American citizens visiting the EU.

I tried limiting my google search to 2010 to 2020, but most results are about fingerprinting requirements for US visas, which most EU visitors do not need to apply for.Liberté2 (talk) 23:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Australian, not European, but we're supposed have as good a relationship with the USA as anyone, except perhaps Canada. I have visited the US four times over the past 20 years. Never had a problem at the border. Last September, on my way to a cruise leaving from Seattle, I was fingerprinted when I arrived at Los Angeles. No problem arose, apart from the appalling equipment being used leading to the process taking a ridiculously long time. HiLo48 (talk) 03:07, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Am British, travelled to the US in 2005 and everyone was fingerprinted at customs. Nanonic (talk) 04:07, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both. Sounds like all foreign visitors gets fingerprinted at the US border then. Liberté2 (talk) 06:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this NY Times article for the 2002 Iranian Olympic team, who were very unsure of how they would be received in the U.S., but decided in advance that if they were asked to be fingerprinted, they would turn around in the airport and fly back to Iran. That didn't happen... AnonMoos (talk) 08:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Office of Biometric Identity Management article says that it was funded from 2005. This undated press release describes a change from 2 to 10 figerprimts being taken from international travellers. Alansplodge (talk) 12:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The 2009 press release says:

"For more than five years, Department of State consular officers and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers have been collecting biometrics—two digital fingerprints and a photograph"

So the 2 finger collection started some time around 2004 to 2005. And the 10 finger collection started some time around 2009, and continues to this day. Liberté2 (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, US and EU passports all include fingerprints in their biometric chips. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh? I (US) don't recall ever having prints taken. My last few renewals were by mail. —Tamfang (talk) 18:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm just wrong. Biometric passport says nope no fingerprint on US passports. I was probably confusing it with my being printed for TSA Pre. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 9

Online guides about share market and mutual funds

If I search online, then many websites open which are from USA, UK. I know that banking rules are same in most countries. However, if I read any online guide regarding investing in shares, stocks, should I read about my country or all countries have same rules? Papuanewtons (talk) 04:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The banking rules may be similar in many countries, but they are not the same. The answer to your question depends on what these guides are about and what your goals are when reading such guides. For online guides about selecting which stocks to buy, the rules are not particularly relevant. (But beware; much of the advice found on the Internet is untrustworthy.) For "how to" guides, telling you how to go about buying the shares you have selected, it is best to consult guides that take account of the rules in your country of residence. --Lambiam 11:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General principles of investing, such as the importance of diversification, are the same from country to country, but the investment specifics vary enormously. John M Baker (talk) 02:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 10

Battersea Pumping Station

I am looking for the Listed Building number for the (now demolished) Grade II listed Battersea Pumping Station. Historic England have the inconvenient habit of deleting any demolished buildings from their listings; or at least from the visible and searchable listings, nor do they quote the number in their various reports that include this building. If I can identify the listing number, I can find the entry on Archive.org. -- Verbarson ^talk_edits 00:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This [5] appears to be what you are looking for. 2A02:C7B:209:D800:CC3F:ABE0:E834:AB77 (talk) 12:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but that LCC Pumping Station is at Lots Road, Kensington, on the other side of the river, and has not (yet) been demolished. I'm looking for the Battersea [Water] Pumping Station, Cringle Street, Wandsworth.

I have discovered a copy of a version the entry here, included as a caption in the Historic England picture archive. However, it does not quote the listing number. I would still like to check the latest version(s) if possible, as there was a great deal of activity and discussion prior to the building's demolition, and it may have been updated as a consequence. -- Verbarson ^talk_edits 13:01, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wayback Machine now has that URL archived here. -- Verbarson ^talk_edits 22:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the number may have been 1226087,^[6] but I had no luck on the Wayback Machine. It was located on Cringle Street, London SW8, in the Nine Elms ward of Wandsworth. --Lambiam 12:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; that is the right entry, but the Wayback Machine does not seem to be archiving any entries on that list. I shall try emailing Historic England. -- Verbarson ^talk_edits 13:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was doubtful about that number because the borough was listed as Kensington and Chelsea, but this organisation [7] appears to keep records. 2A02:C7B:209:D800:CC3F:ABE0:E834:AB77 (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I find archived entries on the Wayback Machine, but the earliest archiving date appears to be September 28, 2015, and the nearest numbers are 1226082 and 1226090. --Lambiam 14:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How does a listed building end up demolished? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 18:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fact of a legal prohibition does not actually prevent people from doing stuff, e.g. murder, rape, arson; and cases like this illegal demolition. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 19:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the UK, listing does not guarantee absolute protection, a building can be de-listed, but only with the approval of the Secretary of State if there is a good enough reason (see Listed building). On the other hand, illegal demolitions are not unknown, as Jack says above. An ongoing case here is the demolition of The Crooked House pub in August. Alansplodge (talk) 19:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Formal delisting can take some time because of the various statutory requirements and bureaucracy. For example, St Elisabeth's Church in Eastbourne remains on the National Heritage List for England despite regrettably being demolished in autumn 2020 and looking like this when I visited a year later. I think "tidying up" of the list happens in bulk from time to time, because in 2013 four other listed buildings in Eastbourne which had been demolished at various points in earlier years were removed from the statutory list at the same time (see Listed buildings in Eastbourne) for more). Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 17:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Indent) @Verbarson: et al: The Heritage Gateway is the way to search for all listed building-related info in England, including delisted and failed listing proposals. Searching for Battersea Pumping Station without quotes yielded several hits, including this confirming delisting but, more usefully, 5 hits from the Greater London Historic Environment Record (HER). Three aren't directly relevant (but may have some tangential info), but this looks to be the most useful and this has useful stuff too. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 16:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hassocks5489:. that's a fantastic site, thank you. It does highlight the difficulty of finding a reference - according to the delisting page, the Battersea Water Pumping Station is 1429557. Perhaps they have a separate sequence for delisted entries.

The London (~and other counties) HER entries are also an interesting source to mine. -- Verbarson ^talk_edits 19:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Verbarson: I think a new number is indeed allocated when an asset is delisted: i.e. the original number is retained as the listed building number and a new sequential number is used when something changes (a delisting in this case). At the moment, newly listed buildings have numbers in the 14xxxxx sequence (I monitor new listings on a daily basis, partly for Wikipedia purposes and partly for off-Wiki writing I do), and 1429557 looks right for when Battersea was delisted. As an example, doing a search on the National Heritage List for England across the last 7 days the latest two new listings are numbered 1486280 and 1487747; a Certificate of Immunity has been assigned 1487416; and a new "Parks and Gardens" listing is 1487578. This implies that other numbers in this sequence are being allocated (or reserved?) for other things, perhaps behind the scenes or (like delistings) things not visible on the NHLE but reachable through the Heritage Gateway. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 11

Eric Gill and the Johnston family

I would be very interested in any information on the connections between Eric Gill, Edward Johnston and the wider Johnston family. We know that Gill studied under Edward Johnston and shared a house with him in London in 1902/3. In 1923, Gill created the Johnston Monument at St Mary's Gilston, Hertfordshire, which commemorates Lieutenant Geoffrey Stewart Johnston and his parents, and in 1927 Gill designed the memorial to Harry Johnston at St Nicholas', Poling, West Sussex.[8] My guess is that Edward Johnston was related to these other Johnstons, as part of a family that seems to have made its money through coffee importation from South America, and that his connection to Gill led to the two monuments. I would be very grateful for any details which could be provided/suggestions as to sources I might investigate. Thanks in advance. KJP1 (talk) 11:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think we're talking about three Johnston families which are either entirely unrelated to each other or only very distantly related. You can follow the links at Wikitree (not a useable source on WP, of course) [9] to find that Geoffrey Stewart Johnston was son of Reginald Eden Johnston, son of Edward Johnston, son of Francis Johnston, son of James Johnston, son of Francis Johnston of Cummertrees, Dumfriesshire. Harry Johnston says in his autobiography [10] that he was son of John Brookes Johnston, son of John Johnston, son of George Dell Johnston, son of John Johnston of Glasgow. According to our article on him, Edward Johnston was son of Fowell Buxton Johnston, son of Andrew Johnston, M.P., and according to The History of Parliament [11] this Andrew Johnston was son of Andrew Johnston, son of Andrew Johnston of Rennyhill, Fife. The fact that all three of the men you name have the same surname and a connection with Eric Gill seems to be no more than a coincidence. --Antiquary (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First, thank you very much for taking the time and trouble to have a look at this. It is interesting that all three were Lowland Scots in origin. The thing about artistic/architectural patronage is that there very often is a personal connection which leads Patron X to chose Artist Y. Thus, for me, it’s an unlikely coincidence that three unrelated Johnstons knew Gill and independently selected him for things as personal as grave monuments. I shall just have to keep looking. Thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 08:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clan Johnstone "once one of the most powerful of the Border Reiver Scottish clans". This website (not sure how reliable) says that there are 65,000 people with that surname worldwide. This one says that there are 23,000 people called Johnstne in the UK and quotes an 1860 source: "For a local [Dumfriesshire and Renfrewshire] surname this is exceedingly common". Alansplodge (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 12

Why Henry Kissinger was given Nobel Peace Prize?

I recently saw many many media reports describing him as a war criminal.

Henry Kissinger, War Criminal Beloved by America’s Ruling Class, Finally Dies

Kissinger: A war criminal with a Nobel Peace Prize

Henry Kissinger: Nobel peace laureate, war criminal?

From Cambodia to Bangladesh: a brief history of Henry Kissinger’s alleged war crimes

Does it mean that powerful American politicians can win Nobel Peace Prize in spite of bombing other countries? 2409:40E1:1077:41E9:A406:1D95:D919:26F1 (talk) 04:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help thinking that the Nobel Committee must have been acting deliberately provocative. 1973 was the year of the Watergate scandal and in November Nixon was denied his right to veto on war matters. The average citizen woke up to the news everyday with the radio but just went commuting after, and in matter of the news the year 1973 was really a mess. Some guidance in moral affairs might have been considered better to be left to the controversy. --Askedonty (talk) 09:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Nobel Peace Prize 1973 was awarded jointly to Henry A. Kissinger and Le Duc Tho "for jointly having negotiated a cease fire in Vietnam in 1973".^[12] The Norwegian Nobel Committee does not make its deliberations public, and we can only speculate what they were thinking. See also Nobel Prize controversies § Peace/1973. --Lambiam 10:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You find one example of an American politician who did something, and you are making the claim that any and all American politicians do it and it is a terrible problem that must be fixed. It is one politician awarded after negotiating peace in a terrible war after many others failed to negotiate peace. 12.116.29.106 (talk) 13:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, there was massive fallout. People who objected included two members of the committee, the New York Times, Tom Lehrer, and many others. However, it is easy to overstate the importance of a current event, and, at the time, a lasting peace would have saved many lives. It's possible that they chose to overlook it, and it's easy to ignore something when there's a cover-up and you don't want to hear it. But that's just my thoughts. 71.112.180.130 (talk) 20:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Xover (Norwegian) in case you know something. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 13

Enhanced Games

Pageviews are rising on this article I started [13], and I'm not sure why. Ideas, anyone? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haruyoshi Ōkawa

Please, can you help me to find a photo of him? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.21.33.81 (talk) 10:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't, but I don't know Japanese. If you don't get a good replay here, you could try asking at Commons or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Otaru, Hokkaido

Who was the founder of the famous glass artigianate in that Japanese city? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.21.33.81 (talk) 12:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]