Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 45

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:NawlinWiki

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TylerDurdenn (talk | contribs) at 21:29, 24 May 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~).

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________________________________________________________

LCF (Band)

Yes, thank you for deleting my article about LCF(Band). We're only a new alternative band that would like the free publicity and "coolness" that comes from us having our band on Wikipedia. Oh and we're all about 14 so thanks for destroying some children's dreams.


Hi I made a wikipedia page for my cricket club and we currently hold the English National record of winning the National Under 13s cup which is a significant achievement in cricket within the English Cricket Board, why would the page be deleted - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wycombe_house_cricket_club we're reocgnised my the Local Professional side as having produced the most amount of professional cricket players in the County in the last 15 years as well

Shortshadyuk (talk) 14:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Dj Silky

Hi,

I have written everything on here in my own words.

Please can you let me know why it has been deleted?

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usilk21 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am re-uploading the content for the above page with references. Can you please let me know if this is now ok.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usilk21 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The World and Wikipedia

According to this page, I should contact you about a stub which I have prepared at User:Wavelength/Sandbox 4/The World and Wikipedia. I will watch your talk page for any reply which you may have. -- Wavelength (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need, you are good to create it if you would like. Prodego talk 17:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, the original entry in 2007 was blanked by its creator. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both. -- Wavelength (talk) 22:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly the original author of the page (in 2007) is also the author of the book (in 2009) which the new article is about. Prodego talk 01:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Focus Bikes

Hi there, I was going to create the page Focus Bikes, but as it was created in the past and deleted by yourself, I must now contact you as per Wikipedia guide lines. I am going to create the article based on Focus Bikes which is a bicycle manufacturer and I am not going to make it an advertorial. I presume this it not an issue and await your reply. Thanks. DubhEire (talk) 19:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First Love - John Clare

Hi I made a page earlier for the John Clare poem 'First Love'. Despite holdon ing it, and explaining that the Copyright bot was in the wrong as the poem does not belong to http://www.romanticlovesecrets.com/First-Love-Poems.html, it belongs to nobody as this site is simply reciting the poem, you have deleted the page. Why?


Barnstar

The Resilient Barnstar
For staying composed and unhindered in the face of attacks from relentless groups of vandals and trolls. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 01:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]


Pillow Pets

I wrote an article about pillow pets earlier. After unambigous promo speedy delete notice, I added hangon tag and explained that this page did not promote any particular company or brand. Alternative/competitor brands making pillow pets listed under History. Pillow pet is a generic word for plush animal toys that can be converted to a pillow. The article informs about what pillow pet means, its first use in commerce, and how it works. Thanks


Frédéric Kristiansson

Dear NawlinWiki,

I made a mistake by creating the profile of Frédéric Kristiansson on the English Wikipedia. Indeed since he was elected as a student representative between 2004 and 2006(you can check it there: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conseil_National_de_la_Vie_Lyc%C3%A9enne ) but is not anymore, the press service could not create his page with any official login. I was mistaken by using "Ministère de l'Education" because it is a Moral Person, and therefore I checked with the administrator Peter, and renamed my account as Emartin33.

A point which bother me though is that a lot of terms are technique and requires an explanation like the abbreviations CNVL, CNJ, etc.. but they do not exist on the English wikipedia. I therefore thought that instead of putting a link to the french wikipages, I would directly put a link toward the sites of the organizations, which are translated in English: Is that also ok with you? Otherwise I am opened to any suggestions and advices. Best Regards, and sorry to have bothered you with those errors.

Emartin33 13:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

  • (1) You really shouldn't link to external sites. (2) I still don't see how Mr. Kristiansson meets the notability guidelines of WP:BIO or the sourcing guidelines of WP:V, so I still don't think he should have an article here. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks, then I will link to articles of wikipedia directly and just put the sites as 'external links'. F. Kristiansson was representing all the French students, which means 2 millions students at both the Minister of Youth and the Minister of Education for 3 years, and launched the debate about teaching first aid at school. He contributed to present school not only as a scholar place but also as a social one, as it is for instance in Sweden. That is why I thought it would be interesting to put him on the english wikipedia, since comparisons with other countries'educative system are highly relevant(especially since I heard he was now a representant at the European Youths, but I am not a 100% sure so I did not add that info on his page). So is that Ok for you if I re-do the article and try with attention to make it follow the guidelines you mentioned above, and with a new account(so that there is no problem of a 'moral person'). Here again, I will gladly welcome your advices and experience. Best Regards,

Emartin33 (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NawlinWiki, Primerily I had to change my username because of the problem mentioned above, so it is now easier to use Discover33 (little ref to the fact that I am a newbie ;) You will find here all the infos you need to be sure that my page was reliable and relevant and that there is no Notability problems. I therefore ask you the permission to re-create it, this time following the guidelines you mentioned.

You will firstly find the visit card that we made for him[maybe delete it after having seen it because I wouldn't want anyone to use those infos]File:Carte de visite FK.jpg

and a link to the discussion between the former Minister of Education, now Prime minister Francois Fillon here, released by the Ministery of Education itself:

"M. Kristiansson. -N'est-il pas alors important que dans chaque lycée de France, les élèves puissent bénéficier de cette formation ?

(It is important that every highschool teaches students first aid)

M. Fillon. -Nous allons donc le mettre en oeuvre.

(It will be done)[1] p18

and then with the next minister Gilles de Robien:

"F. Kristiansson. -Ces lois ont-elles ou seront-elles mises en application prochainement ou votre nomination va-t-elle les modifier?

(When will the law be implemented, does the fact that you are the new minister changes anything?"

G. de Robien. -c'est une question de semaines et non pas de mois (It is a question of weeks, not months now)[2] p21


Here again, the point is not about taking part, but to show that F. Kristiansson is indeed part of the debate right now in France on whether or not First aid should be taught at school. And it is with-and by comparison- to other countries that this debate is done. So as a subject of European importance, especially since we try to take the best from every system, I do think that it is important to have him on the English wikipedia. If it is ok with you, I will also improve the page about first aid, which lakes the civic dimension of teaching students not only to be workers, but also citizens.

Sorry for that long explanation, but I wanted to highlight the relevance of this subject.

Best Regards,

Discover33 (former Emartin33) (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://media.vie-lyceenne.education.fr/file/Comptes-rendus_du_C.N.V.L./03/0/C.N.V.L._28_janvier_2005_22030.pdf
  2. ^ http://media.vie-lyceenne.education.fr/file/Comptes-rendus_du_C.N.V.L./02/9/C.N.V.L._23_SEPTEMBRE_2005_22029.pdf

Debate about Red Baron's funeral on Missing man formation

Someone who apparently imagines that Von Richthofen is a figure from the SECOND world war is madly reverting over a silly idea that funeral flyovers originated from his funeral. His source indicates that it is a supposition, but he insists is "useful" and "accurate". Anyway, I would appreciate your having a look at this as we need to get a consensus.--Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have this page under Watch. I am that person and take your "madly" as a WP:NPA. Let's keep it on the talkpage where it belongs and not draw in admins. I believe NawlinWiki knows me and my history. --Morenooso (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I just checked Soundofmusicals' contribs. Looks like this is one of seven invites. --Morenooso (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And fair enough too - this kind of sillyness (not call anyone silly - we all do silly things from time to time) needs to be speedily resolved - and no one will pick this one up without an invitation while the subject is expressed (on your insistence) so cryptically. The people I have invited were chosen from the list of people who have recently edited the "Red Baron" article, not because they were, or were not, administrators - nor because they are necessarily likely to agree with me - in fact at least one of them is someone I have had vigorous debate with in the past. This is not about point scoring, but keeping Wiki factual and encyclopedic as opposed to supposition riddled. To repeat - there is one source, and it talks about a "rumour". (READ IT!!! PLEASE!!!) Sorry incidentally if you take this as a personal attack - my intent is NOT to "attack" you - but your reverts - my opinion that they are "mad" is of course just my opinion - and in any case was not meant to imply anything about you. I do mad things every day, I think most of us with any character do.!--Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
At least one of the "invitees" has shown up. WP:NPA is WP:NPA and inviting others to an article with the same words is the worst kind of WP:NPA as far as I am concerned. I am walking away from my computer to WP:COOL. --Morenooso (talk) 23:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
user:Bzuk just reverted. He's one of the invitees. --Morenooso (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hi there NawlinWiki, just to let you know, your page was the target of an attack today. As the nature of the attack was very bad, I requested an oversight for them, which the oversighter agreed that they did qualify for oversight.

Sophie 00:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitube

Just any FYI [1]. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia Rugby Football Club

I was wondering why this page was deleted given that several other rugby teams of the same stature are included upon Wikipedia. Running a search for rugby clubs yields teams like the Washington Renegades, Harrisburg RFC, or the St. Louis Hornets, teams that cannot be said to be any more notable than the VRFC given its history. If your concern is that the team is not "professional," then there could not be rugby pages about any of the clubs that I just mentioned. Thank you for your consideration of the matter. Duvallk (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sociopath

Hi. Back in February you fully protected this redirect, which currently points to Psychopathy. Sociopathic personality disorder on the other hand points to Antisocial personality disorder, and Sociopathy, an unprotected redirect, I've just changed to point there as well. I think that all three should point to the same place, and it seems to me that Antisocial personality disorder is the more specifically precise place (Psychopathy is a more general subject). Can you make the edit, or lift the protection? Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darling Crocodile

Hi, I filed an SPI case for Darling Crocodile and the ones you blocked as abusing multiple accounts. I believe I have seen this type of username pattern before. --Bsadowski1 04:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

lol - don't bother ^_^ - Alison ❤ 04:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC) (and check my block logs)[reply]
I saw you blocked a huge sockfarm, Alison. Good job. --Bsadowski1 04:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bagel

There are fact and keep in record for the future before unclear who brought in and what happened. You can find an article of Forbs http://www.forbes.com/global/2000/1127/0324110a.html this is the fact for the market in Japan. Bagel was not available in Japan until Bagelk imported from the U.S. Especially New York Bagel was nobody have before Bagelk brought in. The round shape of donut type of bread called "Bagel" but it was not. This is the back ground I have wrote it down to make sure the fact. and this kind of artcile you can find from Kosher News, Food Distributor Magagine and Crain's NewYork magagine. All I made a comment. So please return back the article to make more clear understanding for Japan market. Thank youFoodfinder (talk) 10:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why the violence???

i just said why willki is notable on the talk page but you deleted it! --Teltek (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4g pharmacovigilance llp

Did they really just blank the page? I was in the middle of adding tags to it when you deleted it... wow. ALI nom nom 21:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Psychological Society wiki page

Hi - I am new comet to Wikipedia and I would like some advice on dealing with people who continue to include material that is incorrect and promotional on the Australian Psychological Society wiki page. A new organisation has been set up in competiton with the Austrlain Psychological Society and its members are continually placing misleading material that is suported by slanderous newspaper references onto this page. They use the reference to the Wiki page to attract new members. I have tried to include the correct and referenced positions of the Australain Psychological Society however it keeps getting taken off and replaced with theirs. I used the wiki rules and used talk to try and be reasonable but keep getting blunt threats to restrict my access!! Is it possble to protect the site to stop this continuing??Nik50382 (talk) 00:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WWM

Hi ... Could you take a look at the article again please? There are now references from peer groups (The Fatherhood Institute), a House of Commons Select Committee link to a project, and a regional news link. Thanks for your help Webnaut (talk) 11:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially I need one external source which describes the work of WWM to validate the article? The Fatherhood Institute which is a peer group working in the sector references the work of WWM as does House of Commons notes. If we look at the Fatherhood Institute their references do not outline their work in great detail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatherhood_Institute. My article took this as a lead, am I missing something here in the discrepancy between their article and mine? Thanks again Webnaut (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brunen IT

Hi, maybe you are a bit too fast in your deleting rigor ;-( May I ask you to acknowledge that there is a page like this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer_system_manufacturers ...on which Brunen IT was mentioned before I came there, but it was outlined in red, which as you know means that, on clicking the link, you're ASKED to write the missing page. That's what I did. The person who started this company is one of most aggressive newcomers in Germany's IT industry. Not that I like him, in fact I don't. But he's come to be kinda big number here, so Brunen is a name some people related to the IT industry (even in the states) might have heard of and find some info that is NOT company PR of him and not in german only, i.e. an en.wikipedia.org entry. If you feel obliged to decide who on the world market is worth being mentioned and who's not, but unfortunately you don't have the knowledge and just guess, you'd better contact another admin who is more familiar what's going on elsewhere BEFORE you destroy other people's contributions. Maybe you should've taken care of the List of computer system manufacturers in the first place. It is not in alphabetical order anyway, so it could well use some bright guy to check & clean up. Ain't that a wonderful task for a highly motivated pal like U?

And now, PLEASE, undelete the text. Thanx.--Gressenicher (talk) 20:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hate piracy badge

Hi there! you deleted this post under "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#A7"; pls take a look at this line "web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant". here "Hate piracy badge" article got importance. It will help people to fight against piracy. It's not someone's or a website's interest, it's all human being's interest. Pls advice. Adnandx (talk) 21:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy of "ANTIQUITIES Ministry"

Heya NawlinWiki. This was my first ever WP:PROD. I would have tagged it under CSD#Articles#A7 but Twinkle disagreed. Was my PROD thus appropriate?--Shirt58 (talk) 11:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you got an admirer

Special:Contributions/Hurricanekatrinazeal. —Soap— 14:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty Queen

I think it is a great source. She is an idol and has gained attention from multiple labels. Why don't see why the account would not be deserved? When they have others that have done less. Please tell me that all the info isn't gone. --PurpleLacyLue 14:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by PurpleLacyLue (talk • contribs)

Hmm

I don't see how the page was promotional? It just gave facts nothing more. I'm starting to think that this is favoritism, if not with all of her titles put together I still think she should be listed on here. :/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by PurpleLacyLue (talk • contribs) 15:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Webb article

Hi there. I was going to create a page about voice actor Jane Webb, but it seems that a page entitled "Jane Webb" has already been deleted twice; first by Wknight94, then by you.

Was that page about the same Jane Webb, or a different one? If the same one, why was it deleted?

Wrightaway (talk) 17:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was a different person (in the first case) and it was a test page the second time.  Frank  |  talk  18:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Frank is correct -- feel free to start a page about the voice actor. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nip one more Grundle sock?

Learn something - read a book today! (talk · contribs). I can do the formal SPI if we need, but since you just did "It says ANYONE is allowed to edit" a moment ago... Grundle posted a list of articles of his that I should "review", Chanin v. Teva was a creation of this particular sock. Tarc (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Porn creep

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Porn creep. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Feinoha Talk, My master 21:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Schnunzi

I am baffled. What is this user attempting to achieve at Shakin' Stevens ? 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 20:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block of Zzzax 937

I see you blocked Zzzax 937 (talk · contribs) for abusing multiple accounts. Here is another - Strong Guy 1420 (talk · contribs) --Biker Biker (talk) 20:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're number 6

I came across this page quite by accident and thought you might be interested to see that your talk page is listed here. I'm not sure if that's a good thing; I *think* I'm happy that mine isn't. Anyway, FYI. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Shirik's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 11:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Drive-by vandalism

What on earth was that about - any idea? --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article for speedy deletion

Not sure whether I can do this myself or whether I should leave it to you 'pros' but something tells me this article needs to be speedily deleted! Hudson702 (talk) 08:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible friendly-fire from autoblock.

Just thought I would notify you of this, as you will have the best knowledge of the scenario and whether the autoblock should be disabled, or the user given exemption to the autoblock. User_talk:Aclarado#Please_lift_this_unjust_IP_block. Thanks for your time, --Taelus (Talk) 14:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your speedy deletion of fireman man

hi. not to be offensive, but i think you unjustly deleted fireman man, a page that was very recently created. if you look at the film's supposed prequel, fireman sam, it seems rather notable. i might be wrong, but i don't know, man. qö₮$@37 (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Returning vandal

You blocked Special:Contributions/151.213.103.99 two days ago. He or she has returned and vandalized the same article. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Over Nine Thousand

Hi, I recently proposed the speedy deletion of the Over Nine Thousand under the G4 criterion, as a page which has already been deleted as a result of a consensus decision, and later recreated with mostly identical content. Could you explain why this redirect does not meet these specifications? I noted that this redirect was deleted as a result of RfD process, and the discussion can be found here. Thanks in advance for any explanation, and I apologise if I have overlooked something. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete Mana Bar

I believe Special:Contributions/24.35.122.169 may have intentionally engineered the speedy deletion of Mana Bar. The person has been continuously putting the speedy notice up, despite discussion, removal, a warning, and a short block. - Zero1328 Talk? 21:47, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Heidegger

NawlinWiki, Jonathansamuel seems to be active again at the Heidegger article, apparently using two different sockpuppets to try to get his desired changes through. Both accounts have been told that their behavior will create the suspicion that they are Jonathansamuel socks, but they are continuing it regardless. I'm telling you about this since you've encountered him there before and are aware of the situation. UserVOBO (talk) 23:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Protected again to discourage the kiddies. Acroterion (talk) 04:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter SerVaas

Why couldn't you give me the 10 day window to add too and finish the article? Must I write it all offline? Iu614 (talk) 23:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arkansas

I see that you recently "changed revision visibility of Arkansas: removed content, edit summary for 2 revisions (RD3: Purely disruptive material). Is this an Oversight function, or something any Admin can do? I have no button which says "remove revisions and leave no trace in the article history." Sure enough, I see no trace in the article history of your modification. Thanks. Edison (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gary Hale Gerstenfield

A user created Gary gerstenfield, and by mistake (I hope) created Template:Gary Hale Gerstenfield. This template does not meet the speedy deletion requirements for templates, but I don't want to get into a TfD ordeal for a test template. Can you delete it? Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your revision deletions

Nawlinwiki, many of the revisions you are deleting do not meet the revision deletion criteria. Please reconsider using this tool; misuse can lead to serious consequences. Risker (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I heard back from Risker and appreciate his her comments. Right now, I am limiting myself to nimp.org browser-crashing links in edit summaries (there are a lot of those). NawlinWiki (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, her comments. Cheers, Rodhullandemu 16:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was just curious what was deleted from Rat. Jared Preston (talk) 17:48, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As I said above, I deleted an edit summary containing a link to a malicious browser-crashing website. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:26, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for EO DC

An editor has asked for a deletion review of EO DC. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 10:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Nerve Recordings. Thank you. Equazcion (talk) 16:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents#Nerve Recordings

Could you comment there? SGGH ping! 16:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection

I've asked this on the ANI thread mentioned above but is it appropriate for your talkpage to be semi-protected if you're doing administrative actions that can affect unregistered/unconfirmed users? Exxolon (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of content on Roleplaying Game and its talk page

I have Role-playing_game and the associated talk page on my watchlist. On May 18, 2010 you deleted some content and the content summaries. I'm wondering what that was about. If it was vandalism, who was the vandal? I am asking because I am curious and I like to be aware of what controversies are brewing. If it was just random nonsense, I'd like to know that too. Is there a way to see what was deleted, or do you remember generally what it was and who it was? Vampyrecat (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of yoomoot and its talk page

The yoomoot page and it's talk page was deleted before I received an answer to my questions regarding it's alleged violation of Wikipedia's notability criteria. I would appreciate the opportunity to continue that discussion. As I understand, the page was deleted on the grounds that the referenced sources were no more than "brief summaries" of the content of yoomoot.com. In fact the length of the articles were standard for articles covering web apps and, more importantly, included original analysis of yoomoot.com which clearly goes beyond a mere descriptive summary. More importantly, the referenced sources were no more "brief summaries" than the referenced sources for similar web-apps which are on Wikipedia, for example Hunch (website). I would like to know why the referenced articles for Hunch and similar websites featured on Wikipedia meet Wikipedia's criteria while those supplied for yoomoot apparently do not. Lumpthing (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nerve Recordings

Can you restore that page for me? --TylerDurdenn (talk) 21:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_45&oldid=363998298"