User talk:Ryan kirkpatrick

Welcome

Hello, Ryan kirkpatrick! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Try to fill in the edit summary field with each edit. Good luck! -Fnlayson (talk) 19:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

As you have shown an interest in British European Airways Flight 284 we thought you might like to take an interest in this new WikiProject.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! Canglesea (talk) 17:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cubana de Aviación Flight 310

The article Cubana de Aviación Flight 310 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a place for news reports.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 19:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of British European Airways Flight S200P

The article British European Airways Flight S200P has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No footnotes and does not indicate encyclopedic notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Jeandré (talk), 2010-01-30t05:56z 05:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Spelling

Hey, you should seriously give some thought to writing all your contibutions using Microsoft Word, spell-checking and then copying and pasting to Wikipedia. Your spelling is terrible. 210.15.195.87 (talk) 06:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Cubana de Aviación Flight 310

I have nominated Cubana de Aviación Flight 310, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubana de Aviación Flight 310. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 17:08, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I disagree with the nom, and have said so. I've made a few slight alterations to the article too. I've had a look at some of your other articles. The main problem seems to be referencing. You should get into the habit of naming references and using the {{cite web}} template. If you need any help, give me a shout. Mjroots (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of British Airtours Flight KT101

The article British Airtours Flight KT101 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A minor accident that received little in-depth coverage. Does not appear to pass WP:N and also looks like a WP:NOT#NEWS case.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nsk92 (talk) 00:04, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of terrorist incidents in the Republic of Ireland

The article List of terrorist incidents in the Republic of Ireland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List has no published citations.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Minimac (talk) 14:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

• I am removing the PROD on this article because I do not concur with the rationale made for deletion. WP:BEFORE was not considered. That said, this article needs 4 specific improvements if it has any hope of surviving an inevitable AfD if they are not made. I am suggesting to editors familar with the subject to make these improvements as soon as practical.
  • Strengthen the lead-in paragraph by including clear, concise inclusion criteria and a description of what this list is really about. Add appropriate in-line citations and wikilinks in the lead-in to leave the reader with no doubt where this information came from and what entries meet inclusion criteria.
  • For every entry that meets the inclusion criteria that you establish in the lead-in, add a phrase or sentence to that entry that provides additional context for that entry. One of the most powerful attributes of a well annotated list is the ability to provide additional and meaningful context for list entries. Lists that are well annotated will never be redundant to categories because categories provide no context what-so-ever for category entries. This list demonstrates the idea Small mammals of Yellowstone National Park
  • For every entry that is red-linked (no article) you must provide an inline citation to validate its presence in the list. For wiki-linked entries, adding an in-line citation that indeed verifies the entry meets inclusion criteria and that annotations are verifiable, does nothing but improve the overall quality of the list.
  • Instead of organizing the list in a purely alphabetical or chronological way, consider whether or not you can create sub sections that further enhance the understanding of the inclusion criteria. For example you could separate entries by terrorist group, then sub-divide chronologically.

• I am not familar with nor an expert on the nuances of Irish terrorism, so these are improvements I can only suggest, but not undertake. If you have any specific questions, let me know. Good Luck--Mike Cline (talk) 15:25, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Concerns about your edits

G'day from Oz. I see that you have left a message on Canglesea's talk page because you are concerned that an article you have created will be deleted. I believe that it won't because it meets the criteria for inclusion, however several articles created by you have in fact been deleteed as they did not meet the criteria. On the other hand, several of the articles you have created clearly warrant a WP article.

Can I suggest that before you create more articles you familiarise yourself with the relevant criteria and/or limit yourself to creating articles concerning accidents to large jet aircraft that result in fatalities - these at least will always meet the criteria. Can I also suggest that, instead of continually creating articles, you go back to revisit the ones you have already started and help in fixing them up. For one thing, your spelling and grammar are just awful - perhaps you could sit down with someone else at your computer and s/he could read through the stuff you write and help you to fix it up. You should also learn to reference articles correctly. Hope this helps, cheers. YSSYguy (talk) 23:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

British Airways Flight 2019

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of British Airways Flight 2019, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010905-1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Your spelling

Hello again, I just want to point out some of your spelling mistakes.

• Your spelling: "non" as in "non of the passengers were killed"; the correct spelling is "none".
• Your spelling: "whether" as in "the whether was bad", the correct spelling is "weather". "Whether" is a different word.
• Your spelling: "curt" as in "curt fire", the correct spelling is "caught".
• Your spelling: "bored" as in "on bored the aircraft", the correct spelling is "board".
• Your spelling: "whet" as in "the aircraft whet into a stall", the correct spelling is "went".
• Your spelling: "nots" as in "speed of 140 nots", the correct spelling is "knots".
• Your spelling: "were" as in "were the aircraft stopped", the correct spelling is "where".
• Your spelling: "privet" as in "privet aircraft", the correct spelling is "private".
• Your spelling: "Febuary", the correct spelling is "February".

YSSYguy (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

• Your spelling: "happed", as in "the crash happed near Heathrow Airport", the correct spelling is "happened"
• Your spelling: "their", as in "their were 50 passengers", the correct spelling is "there".
• Your spelling: "there", as in "the passengers were trapped in there seats", the correct spelling is "their".

How about you spend some time revisiting some of the articles you have created and fixing up the spelling.

YSSYguy (talk) 22:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

• Your spelling: "takes", as in "takes were empty", the correct spelling is "tanks".

Please use a spell checker. Many current web browsers have one built in. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

• Your spelling: "bust", as in "bust into flames", the correct spelling is "burst".

You are also frequently mis-typing the word "approach", I have seen you render it as "apporach" and "appraoch".

As Dennis the Tiger suggests, slow down. Read your edits carefully before saving; some of your recent edits have been quite good but your work on the Scandinavian Airlines Flight 871 article had the same problems as previously noted. YSSYguy (talk) 04:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Dude! Slow down!!

Ryan, I'm going to dissent slightly from Onion and suggest you use a spell checker to supplement what you've been doing, as they can only do so much. (EG: "I use spell check", if one is not attentive to their work, may come out as "Eye ewes spiel czech" - sounds the same thanks to the wonderful world of homonyms, but that second sentence makes no sense whatsoever.) It is extremely important that not only words are spelled correctly, but that the correctly spelled words are the correct words to begin with. Case in point, above: privet, to use one example, is spelled right, but has little to do with anything private.

Moreover, in American Airways Flight 1, I spotted numerous syntax errors. Misuse of "their" (should be "there"), multiple uses of the word "caption" where it should be "captain", "tolled" (past-tense of toll) instead of "told" (past-tense of tell), "mints" (candy) instead of possibly "minutes" (measure of time), and in the accident summary, a combination sentence fragment and run on sentence.

Forgive my bluntness, but your work, in short, needs some serious attention.

I think that, more than merely using a spell checker, you simply need to slow down and watch your work. Go for quality rather than quantity. This is not a race to create articles - the number of articles you create means little if the quality is not up to snuff. We would rather you make a small number of high quality edits than a large number of mediocre edits.

--Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Ryan, an additional thought: how are you inputting your text? Are you using voice recognition, or are you using a keyboard? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Newry car bombing

The Newry car bombing happened on February 22nd at 10:30pm just to let you know. EyezWideShut (talk) 13:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Aviastar Flight 1906

It may be to your advantage to add the {{inuse}} template to the article while you're editing. I was thinking about sorting out some refs, adding some structure, METAR etc but I'll leave it for now. Mjroots (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I've nominated Aviastar Flight 1906, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Mjroots (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC) Mjroots (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 1988 North Island plane crash

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 1988 North Island plane crash. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1988 North Island plane crash. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Aviastar Flight 1906

On March 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aviastar Flight 1906, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

List of terrorist incidents, 2010

Your edits are awesome. really appreciated and youre covering places int he world most people wounldnt even know. Just one thing though, some of them were off date . i've corrected so no harm done, but just for future reference.

Inuse template

The {{inuse}} template means that someone is editing the article and requests that other editors do not edit it while it is displayed to prevent edit conflicts. Your edit to 2010 Mexico Aerounion – Aerotransporte de Carga Union A300 crash meant that I got an edit conflict. Please do not edit articles when the template is displayed. Mjroots (talk) 11:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Transport disasters in Bermuda

A tag has been placed on Transport disasters in Bermuda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Australian earthquake?

Please note how local and specific it was - and how it can be refined - please do not create such wide scope titles - the impact was very small and local - thanks SatuSuro 08:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Non-notable Greek earthquake

According to this: [[1]], a quake of least 5.0 magnitude occurs around once a year or so in this area. It caused no damage at all. No notability whatsover. This does not deserve an article.

Proposed deletion of 2010 Texas earthquake

The article 2010 Texas earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable earthquake.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:44, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Texas earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Texas earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Texas earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. noq (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2010 Crete earthquake

The article 2010 Crete earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable event. The area is one of the most seismogenic in the world, earthquakes happen as a matter of course. Unless they have a consequence, they are not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 08:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dan-Air Flight 045

I have nominated Dan-Air Flight 045, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan-Air Flight 045. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. YSSYguy (talk) 10:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Aircraft accident articles

I keep seeing in the articles that you create, that you include information that is not mentioned in the references. Is this because you are getting info from other sources and not providing references, or are you just making stuff up? You also need to look at the references you use more carefully, as some of the information you include in the articles is contradicted by the references. Dan-Air Flight 045 is a good example; you stated that the aircraft went into the North Sea, but the accident report states that the aircraft stopped in mud beside the runway. And Please, be more careful with your spelling, it is just as bad as ever. YSSYguy (talk) 07:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree on the subject of spelling (and grammar). That includes article names. Be careful. Remember - less haste more speed.GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 County Clare earthquake

I have nominated 2010 County Clare earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 County Clare earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mikemoral♪♫ 18:59, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Created articles

Hello Ryan kirkpatrick and thanks for your contributions to the encyclopedia, as you can see from the messages a lot of the articles you create are not deemed to be notable and others need a lot of corrections particularly spelling and badly formed English. Can I ask before you create an article please check that it meets our standards of notability, it may be worth asking other editors if the subject is notable before you create it. Can I ask you also to be take care with spelling, it may be that your first language may not be English in which case you may need to use a spell checker or get somebody else to help with the spelling and English grammer. Although all contributions are welcome your articles are creating a lot of extra work for other editors, so if you are not sure if you should be creating the article then please check by leaving a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation. Perhaps you should consider creating the articles in a sandbox like User:Ryan kirkpatrick/sandbox and inviting other editors to check your work. So please consider these points and if you have any questions then please ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:59, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2010 Brazil earthquake and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are 2010 Brazil earthquake, 2010 Pyrenees earthquake. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Brazil earthquake for 2010 Brazil earthquake, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Pyrenees earthquake for 2010 Pyrenees earthquake. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of London Biggin Hill Airport Mid-air collision

I have nominated London Biggin Hill Airport Mid-air collision, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Biggin Hill Airport Mid-air collision. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. YSSYguy (talk) 03:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Loganair Flight 670

Hello Ryan kirkpatrick, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on May 17 2010, Loganair Flight 670, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:220.253.107.94 (page has mainspace links, and 11 edits). This has been done because the page is unquestionably a copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:220.253.107.94. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 220.253.107.94 (talk · contribs) 12:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to List of terrorist incidents, 2010. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.

Kindly do not add incidents where the source says "Ferguson called the blast an "isolated incident" and said it was unlikely that the explosion was related to terrorism", or for that matter any other incident which is not sourced as "terrorism". O Fenian (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Citing references

I have noticed that you seldom cite references in the articles you create, or the articles you edit; then on the rare occasions that you do cite a reference you do not cite the correct access date, such as your recent edits to List of terrorist incidents, 2000. This potentially gives a misleading impression to readers of the article. As for the air crash articles you create using only a couple of sources, you don't bother to cite references at all. See this edit I made to Grand Canyon Airlines Flight 6 and the later version of 1936 KLM Croydon accident for two different ways of citing references. You could also use the method that you used in List of terrorist incidents, 2000 (filling in the rest of the info such as the author and article/publication title) - there are several different ways to cite references. Once again, I suggest you get someone else to read what you write before you click 'save page', or as MilborneOne suggested use a Sandbox and have someone look at your work there; it would save a lot of work for other editors. YSSYguy (talk) 00:33, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2003 Amazon earthquake

I have nominated 2003 Amazon earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003 Amazon earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aditya Ex Machina 14:48, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2004 Cayman Islands earthquake

I have nominated 2004 Cayman Islands earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Cayman Islands earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aditya Ex Machina 14:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 Germany earthquake

I have nominated 2009 Germany earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Germany earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aditya Ex Machina 14:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to List of terrorist incidents, 2010, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have once again added an incident which is unsourced as terrorism, and not only that you have failed to even read the article you are using as a source. Please stop being disruptive and only add incidents which have been described as terrorism and not every incident where a bomb explodes. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 09:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

I concur. WP has policies on original research, neutral point-of-view, and use of the term "terrorism," all of which you are violating with your edits. Please stop. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 13:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

1965 Saigon bombing

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1965 Saigon bombing, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kwangjubiennale.org/exhibition_art/War-Memorabilia/Vietnam-1961-75_19.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:46, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Ryan kirkpatrick)

Hello, Ryan kirkpatrick. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ryan kirkpatrick, where you may want to participate. O Fenian (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC) O Fenian (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Terrorism in Vietnam

Category:Terrorism in Vietnam, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 13:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: List of terrorist incidents, 2010

As you have been asked many times before, do not add examples to this article unless they are clearly acts of terrorism. You are well past the point of claiming these are innocent errors. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 13:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Your response aptly demonstrates the exact nature of one of the problems with your editing. Wikipedia is not interested in which incidents you personally think are terrorist incidents, it is interested in incidents which reliable sources have called terrorism. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 14:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of terrorist incidents, 2010, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. I can't see the point of adding random criminal acts to the above article. Especially since you go to the bother of citing them.

I don't understand your logic in the additions you've made to this article. WikiuserNI (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Please be more careful

You need to lift your game across WP, not just in the list of terrorist incidents articles. In your recent edit to Air France accidents and incidents you have made several very careless errors. I have highlighted the errors and made comments:

• On 2 September 1946, a Douglas DC-3 (registration F-BAXD) lost height after taking off from Paris – Le Bourget Airport on a flight to Croydon Airport and crashed onto a factory. The accident killed 19 of the 26 passengers and crew on board the DC-9 [incorrect aircraft type] and one person was killed on the ground. http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19460904-0 [not properly referenced]

• On 14 March 1947, a Douglas DC-3 (registration F-BAXO) crashed into Mont Moucherolles near Châteaubernard on a flight from Lyon-Bron Airport to Nice Côte d'Azur Airport. The crash killed all 23 on board the aircraft. [no reference]

• On 6 January 1948, a Douglas DC-3 (registration F-BAXC) crashed near Gonesse as the flight was on apporach [incorrect spelling] to Paris – Le Bourget Airport after a flight from Brussels Airport. The accident killed all 16 on bored [incorrect spelling] the DC-3. http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19480106-0 [not properly referenced]

• On 1 August 1948, a Latécoère 631 (registration F-BDRC also named Lionel de Marnier)on [no space] a flight from Martinique Aimé Césaire International Airport on the island of Martinique to Nouadhibou International Airport in Mauritania. The flying boat crashed into the Atlantic Ocean killing 52 passengers and crew on baord [incorrect spelling] cuase [incorrect spelling] of crash unkown. [incorrect spelling] [also very poor grammar, in this case a lack of punctuation] http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19480801-1 [not properly referenced]

In this one relatively small edit you have made five spelling mistakes, these being your extremely-common misspellings of "board" (which you have actually managed to twice spell correctly in this edit), "approach", "cause" and "unknown". You have as yet not shown any attempt to be more careful with your spelling, despite numerous requests to do so. In addition I can only find one edit where you revisited an article you created or edited and fixed a spelling mistake; this despite the fact that the only articles that you have created that did not contain large numbers of spelling mistakes were copy-and-paste copyright violations that have been deleted because of this. You have demonstrated by your edits to terrorism-related articles that you know how to reference properly, but you never do this in the aviation-related articles (the edit above being a prime example). This has now been pointed out to you several times and I can only conclude that your failure to do this is laziness on your part.

Do you make use of the "show preview" function? If you don't (and I suspect that this is the case, as on numerous occasions you have made several edits in the space of a couple of minutes) then can I suggest that you start using it and carefully read what you have typed, or better still have someone else carefully read what you have typed. YSSYguy (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1993 Norwich Airport G-OBWD incident

I have nominated 1993 Norwich Airport G-OBWD incident, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1993 Norwich Airport G-OBWD incident. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. YSSYguy (talk) 12:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Community restrictions

O Fenian (talk) 23:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Final warning regarding List of terrorist incidents, 2010

If you continue to ignore the issues raised at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ryan kirkpatrick they will not go away. The next step to curb your disruptive editing will be to move for you to be banned from the article, and related ones. I strongly recommend you take heed of the issues raised, and amend your editing in order to avoid bans being necessary. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 23:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

My List of terrorist incidents, 2010

I just put this one on because if i carn't do on the realy one i will make mine own on my taik. No one say that i canr't and people can look at this and think are this incident of terrorisam. Now don't remove them if you they should go on tell me and i will put it on. If you don't what them on then don't say anything it makes it easyer for me.

May

Date	Dead	Injured	Location and description
May 13	0	0	Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia A stolen car filled with drums of petrol was ramraided through the front doors of the union headquarters in Lidcombe. At 10.30pm the car bomb exploded causing damaged to the building. Police say it was important the message was sent out that violent, terrorist-style attacks on community organisations would not be tolerated. (This attack is similar to a car the was stolen was used as a car bomb hitting a british army Palace Barracks in Holywood in a area of Belfast on April 12 2010) .
May 17	0	6	Lurgan, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom A blast bomb and petrol bombs injured six police officers in town of Lurgan. The attack happaned as police were removing suspected bomb planted by dissident republicans on the Belfast to Dublin railwayline .
May 17	0	0	Jacksonville, Florida, United States A pipe bomb exploded outisde a mosque in Jacksonville. No one was killed or injured in the attack and the mosque had minor damaged in the blast.
May 23	1	0	Barboursville, West Virginia, United States A pipe bomb exploded inisde a nightclub at 2:30 a.m in the villege ofBarboursville. The attack killed one person police evacuated as many as 100 people from an apartment complex, mobile home and 20 to 25 houses while they searched for other bombs. Police found three other bombs and did a controled explosion were nobady else was killed or injured.
May 24	0	0	Frenchtown Charter Township, Michigan, United States A pipe bomb exploded in a Woodland Beach back yard in Frenchtown Charter Township. No one was killed or injured in the attack.
May 28	0	0	Castlewellan, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom A pipe bomb expolded inside a Sinn Fein office in the town of Castlewellan. No one was killed or injured in the blast and caused damaged to the office.
May 28	0	0	Derry, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom A pipe bomb was found next to a bar in the city of Derry. Police removed the bomb before it exploded.

June

Date	Dead	Injured	Location and description
June 6	1	6	Guiyang, China A homemade bomb exploded insdie a restaurant in the city of Guiyang. One man was killed and six people injured in the blast .
June 8	0	15	Istanbul, Turkey 15 police officers were injured after a bomb exploded under there police bus in Istanbul .
June 9	0	22	Yala, Thailand 22 people were wounded after a bomb epxloded inside a tea shop in the city of Yala.
June 11	4	20	Lakhdaria, Algeria A turck bomb exploded next to a police roadblock in city of Lakhdaria. The bombing killed four and wounded 20 poepleand police
June 11	1	14	Elazig, Turkey PKK rebel killed one soldier and wounded fourteen after shoots were fired and a roadside bomb exploded in the city of Elazig.
June 11	9	14	Kandahar, Afghanistan A. raodside bomb exploded next to a minbus in the city of Kandahar. The blast killed 9 and wounded 8 people
June 12	2	6	Kaspiisk, Makhachkala, Dagestan, Russia Two people was killed and two injured in the city of Kaspiisk. In another attack a hand grenade had beeen thrown at a bar in the city of Makhachkala. That attack injured four people .

List of terrorist incidents, 2010 continued

I do not understand the difficulty you are having with this article. As has been said before, we are not interested in any additions that you personally think are "terrorism", only ones that reliable sources that have described as "terrorism". Edits to User talk:Ryan kirkpatrick/ List of terrorist incidents, 2010 such as this which is emphatically not terrorism, and this where a policeman says "I can confirm he was a dissatisfied claimant; this is not a terrorist incident" show you are either not listening or do not understand what other editors are saying in the first place. If you continue to add similar incidents to the article in your userspace I will simply ignore the list as a complete waste of time. I suggest you take note of the second sentence in my post and add appropriate incidents to the main article. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 21:56, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Since you have chosen to ignore this message, and the request for comment you were previously notified of, and continued to add incidents which are unsourced as terrorism I have now given up trying to make you understand, and will be seeking to have you banned from editing articles relating to terrorism. O Fenian (talk) 19:35, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Good job on providing list of this year's terrorist incidents! On the other hand, what O Fenian does it's a real scandal and that user should be banned. Amakthea computer (talk)

Re: List of rail accidents (2010–2019)

It's OK Ryan, no need for you to do anything: once again someone else has fixed up your poor edits. If you use the "Show preview" function you might just pick some of your problems up. YSSYguy (talk) 01:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

i am blocked

Ok someone how I don't even now has blocked blocked me from editing becuase I have been using two wikipedia web sites at the same time. But the thing is I am still new to this and no one told me I was not alowed to do that. So i am a bit stuck and don't now how two unblock myself. Ryan kirkpatrick 11:45, 27 June 2010 (GMT)