User talk:Otto4711

Reversion of special characters

Why when I edit articles do special characters (arrows, accented characters) sometimes suddenly spontaneously turn into question marks? See for example Treasure Hunters (TV series) in which a minor edit by me nowhere near any of them caused every arrow and accented character on the page to mutate. Otto4711 21:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's most likely the browser you're using, or the character encoding that your browser is using at the moment. Have you tried changing the encoding to Unicode UTF-8? --JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 21:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Playing card symbols

Trying to insert card suit symbols into The Cincinnati Kid and it's not working. I used the notation in the article Yoshio Nakano as my guide and I thought I did it right, but apparently not. Otto4711 02:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you need the semicolons: ♣ ♥ ♦ ♠ (or, &clubs; &hearts; &diams; &spades;). =D Luna Santin 02:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Heap

Good comics history, man! Kudos on your edits here! -- Tenebrae 04:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Otto4711-

Thanks for the work on Male prostitution in the arts.
I noticed that you removed comments on a few films... why?
Please remember to use edit summaries.

Thanks and keep up the good work- NYArtsnWords 22:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Wel done on your recent edits to the Wicked article - I think there's still a lot to be done though!-- Flutefluteflute ^Talk ^{Contributions} 13:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment of the day (uhh, my awards review process takes a week, see)

"Because only a jackass..." aaaaaahhhahahahaahaha you slayed me, Otto. It's a good thing I wasn't sipping my coffee when I read that. — coelacan talk — 06:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Death By Gluten Afd

Death By Google - what a classic, by far the best Afd quote I have ever seen!! Keep it up ;-) RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CFDs

Hey Otto4711 - We sometimes disagree on the CFDs but I wanted to say I appreciate you persistently making relevant points on the current LGBT-related CFDs. I'm really going to stay out of it as much as possible because I feel, strongly, that the CFDs are getting bogged down with a lot of people making nominations to make a point, or to implement their personal philosophies about the significance of particular identities. Nevertheless, even though I'm feeling frustrated with wikipedia process right now, I had resolved previously to give props to people when I could. Best, lquilter 04:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's Time For Regis!

Otto, aside from Be Bold, there are stips to not remove the AfD banner from the page. Should I just redirect and nuke the AfD, or let it go? --Dennisthe2 20:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a vandal.

Otto4711, you didn't vandalize at all; I never said you did. All I said in my summaries was that you didn't discuss the change on the talk pages first. I was always taught that major changes should be discussed first. If you thought that I called you a vandal, I'm sorry. You are not a vandal. Acalamari 16:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I responded with: Listen, I'm sorry if I've been incivil. It wasn't my intention. I hope in the future we can work peacefully. I made a mess of the situation that just happened. I am sorry.

I should also add: I should have been more specific. I was foolish in making that error. Acalamari 17:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Here's some Penguins for you! Penguins somehow in their own strange way promote WikiLove and hopefully these Penguins have made your day seem even better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Crested Penguin 05:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

You are decimating Wikipedia

Hello...I'd just like to let you know that you are decimating Wikipedia by nominating any and all categories that you can find for deletion. You and 2-3 people end up deleting hundreds of categories that many people have worked on for a long time, not in the least limited to many of the TV show and family categories. I'd advise you to please end your deletion-mania. --172.164.242.170 13:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TPIR pricing games

What I was hoping to accomplish is to get people actually working towards something instead of just talking. AfD can have that effect: it's a debate, everyone debates, but often people are overly hesitant to take action. I agree, there was some discussion of a retired vs. non-retired solution but that didn't have consensus either, clearly. Hopefully if a discussion can be had where the point is how best to organize the articles, then that can be properly addressed. But none of the hoping for merging will go anywhere if no one actually puts together the more general articles. IMO, that can be done, at first, without redirecting the individual game articles. (BTW, I don't, myself, think the retired vs. non-retired idea is the best. Why wouldn't a simple break-up alphabetically be the best idea? Eg List of The Price is Right pricing games (A-H), et cetera.) Mango juice^talk 19:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One thought: some of the games seem to have changed over time, whereas others have "retired version" and "unretired version"s. To me, that distinction seems a little arbitrary. So there might be some overlap among the lists. Good luck. Mango juice^talk 20:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Mangojuice is getting confused over Bullseye and Balance Game...there are actually two pricing games with each of these titles, none of which have anything to do with one another.

By the way, nice work combining all the retired games into one page. I think it looks good. -TPIRFanSteve 18:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chasing down CFDs

Thanks for listing so many connected categories after I nominated the Sean Connery one. I'm impressed with your thoroughness - you nominated all of the ones that I thought were suspect. --GargoyleMT 00:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I love the...

Thank you so much for taking care of the I love the... mergers. I planned on doing that eventually but don't have a lot of time. You're a wikisaint. Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 18:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never thought I'd see the day...

...that you and I were on the same side of an argument. Where are these intellectuals when the subject is "Running jokes in Friends"? Best wishes Mandsford 00:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if you mean Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1949-1950 United States network television schedule (weekday), I just agreed with both of you. The world may indeed be changing. DGG (talk) 01:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you both sound so surprised. Even a blind pig finds the occasional truffle so of course y'all are going to get an AFD right eventually. ;-) Otto4711 03:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Index of deleted categories ...

You may find this useful at some point ... User:ProveIt/index. Feel free to add stuff you think is appropriate... It came out of a discussion I had with Sam at the last meetup. -- Prove It ^(talk) 20:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relocated comment

Otto4711 I am trying to figure out how to communicate with you regarding your reporting me to spam and the deletion of my edits. Please see the facts I list are valid and I have links to the source. As well the usage of the word "Gay" is used on my page in description of movies and is appropriate for the subject Ryan Idol. Not all information listed is flattering to myself nor should the facts be hidden from the reader to make a image appear something he or it is not. These are Gay Movies he is in and his name is known in the gay adult movies not heterosexual. Please contact me at charles@charlespeyton.com or through the wikipedia site. I am sorry if this is no the proper way to get you a message but I have tried many other ways and have received no communication back. thanks charlespeyton —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlespeyton (talk • contribs) 23:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Priceless!

your addition of material to Friend of Dorothy gave my partner and me a wonderful laugh this evening. Thanks for such good editing! Jeffpw (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transamerican Love Story

Thanks for all your excellent work on this article! For additional references, you can find a list of published reviews and articles on the series here. Jokestress (talk) 19:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Day of Spring!

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}!
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Congratulations

on GA status for Boys in the Sand. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 21:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Otto4711 (talk) 22:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Otto

Thanks for catching Category:Disputed convictions leading to execution as a re-creation under another name. Sometimes it's tricky to catch those when editors have changed the wording... Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those pesky editors can be a wily bunch. Otto4711 (talk) 22:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos

Good work on additions to José Sarria, authoring Black Cat Bar, et cetera. Keep up the good work. - House of Scandal (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's been a pleasure learning more about them. Otto4711 (talk) 22:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

José Sarria

Hi,

Thanks for picking up the removal of the accent at José Sarria. I have reported this as a bug with a section of the AWB code. You also made a comment bare years should not be wikified but you wikified the years. Can you clarify the mismatch between your statement and your edit? Thanks. Lightmouse (talk) 08:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, who knows, I was probably drunk at the time. Otto4711 (talk) 12:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drunken editing is a fine tradition amongst Wikipedians. I have taken the liberty of delinking the years again. I hope that is how you like it, if not just revert it again, I won't mind. Keep up the good work (and the good living!). Lightmouse (talk) 12:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT must be used without accent for sorting. Please read instructions in template's page. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just copying: Letters with accents or diacritics should generally be avoided in sort keys, because they are sorted incorrectly by the Mediawiki software. For example, the software sorts "á" after "z", which is not correct in any language. For this reason, articles with accented characters in the title will almost certainly require an explicit sort key instead of relying on the default "sort by article title" behavior. For example, the article about the Hungarian town of Ács uses Acs as its sort key. Remember that sort keys are not displayed, so the article title will still show up with the correct spelling in the category page. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You asked about the photo of Jose being used. I have full permission to use it. Not sure how to address this since the link you left me talks about me wanting to submit a photo, not provide additional documentation on the photo itself. Should I go and add additional information attached to the photo itself? Jose is in New York now and will be at the Fourth Street Theatre Workshop on Monday, September 29th for the Imperial Court of New York's NOATG DVD party. She will be performing a few numbers and having a talk with many of us. I could reconfirm that I have full rights then as well as check with the person who provided me the photo Panzi who is now the President of the International Court System and handles many of Jose's affairs due to Jose's age. C. Williams (talk) 02:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Column widths

{{helpme}} I am trying to get List of Judy Garland awards and honors promoted to Featured List and the current stumbling block is that reviewers want the various tables to be the same width. I don't know how to change column widths. Any instruction would be most appreciated. Thanks. Otto4711 (talk) 22:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC) ! width="xx"|Header text instead of just !Header text . I think. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and worked some work on it. The widths I used look okay to me, but of course may need to be tweaked; if nothing else, the formatting should be pretty obvious for now. Was also looking for an "inducted" template, similar to {{won}} and {{nom}}, and found {{included}}, which I'll add in a moment. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so very much!

Thanks very much for the barnstar - it is always quite nice to know that my work is both noticed and appreciated. Keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calpernia Addams Article

Hello,

As someone involved in reverting my article, I'm sure you're aware that I am unhappy about my Wikipedia article and have been for a long time. I've found that no one at Wikipedia is interested in responding to my rationale for wanting my article pared down to the bare bones minimum in accordance with Wikipedia's own policy at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons and no one seems to care about my concerns or wishes whatsoever. This is not a game to me. Your hobby is impacting my life. I won't bother putting that in all caps, or bold, because there is no internet typeface that can convey this. I have to rely on your ability to empathize and weigh the triviality of my article's value to Wikipedia vs. the impact on my life. The fact that I am at the mercy of strangers is infuriating.

I sincerely hope that none of you are ever in a position remotely similar to mine, in which your core identity is challenged daily in every arena, from the public street to the highest courts. In which your life is chased by a tragic event that everyone is determined to have follow you to your own grave.

Again, I ask, please leave me alone. Please, leave me alone.

Calpernia Addams Calperniaaddams (talk) 05:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm queer. My core identity gets challenged on a daily basis too, so the "my oppression is worse than your oppression" game cuts no ice with me. It is to say the least disingenuous for you to claim that you are harmed by an article that merely collects things that you yourself have freely said in interviews. WP:BLP says in relevant part, "When in doubt, biographies should be pared back to a version that is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic." Nothing included in your article is unsourced, nothing in it is not neutral and nothing in it is off-topic. Otto4711 (talk) 06:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images, for 6 year olds

This is how I find images for my articles.

Find who the copyright owner is. Email the place you found it. Email the subject. Email the best authority on who took the picture, and email the photographer. 99% of the time the photographer will be the copyright holder. If the photographer is dead, it may pass to the subject. It may pass to a library or archives if the photographer took a lot of images.
Once you get a solid answer on who owns the copyright, send them a very, very nice email that explains who you are and what you are doing, and why you need their permission. I have many emails I have sent to various photographers, libraries, subjects, etc., asking them for permission to use their photos (if you want a copy I can send one to you). The following is the release Wikipedia gives for editors to send: I own the copyright to the images attached. I grant permission to copy, distribute and/or modify these documents under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. By placing their name at the bottom of that statement, they agree that you can put the image on Wikipedia. Be nice in your email. I can't stress that enough. Some photographers will consider what you're asking. Some will ask their lawyers. Some will turn you down. That's how much fun this is. If they turn you down, find another image. You will not be able to use their image, even if it's already in the article. You will have to put the image up for speedy deletion. Respect their artistic rights and all.
If they grant you permission, thank them profusely. Then send an email to permissions@wikipedia.org with the release statement in italics above and the name and contact information of the copyright holder. Attach the image(s) in question to the email to Wikipedia. You will get a response in 24 hours with a ticket number. A sysop who has access to the OTRS system will update the image file with the OTRS ticket. --Moni3 (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice but I'm not sure if it's going to work. The image in question is already supposedly released to the PD and is already on WIkipedia but it's supposedly released by an organization. I'm trying to backtrack through the person who uploaded it but he's as confused about this image stuff as I am. Imagery is the effin' worst part of Wikipedia. Otto4711 (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imagery, yes, drives me nuts. If the image came on board a couple of years ago or before, that may have been before image policy was so strict. The image may have been uploaded from a scan in some book or magazine, and from the appearance of it, does not look like it is from a Public Domain source. Have you contacted Sarria himself? Can Sarria or whoever is interested in promoting his legacy provide you with the answer? Does the San Francisco Public Library have archives on Sarria? How about the SF GLBT Historical Society? The answers exist, you just have to poke around to find them. I make lots of calls too. --Moni3 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was uploaded in 2007, after the big crackdown. I think it's a publicity/glamour shot perhaps intended for press kits and the like. The guy who uploaded it is working on tracking down who actually took the photo and re-confirming the rights and is going to be meeting with Jose next week. I'll pass along the licensing info to him and hope that he can locate the copyright holder and have them email him or me with it. Otto4711 (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have to tell you something about what you're doing in that "Saw" AfD discussion...

...and that something is: "You're great!" I don't agree with your argument, of course, but I am enjoying your contribution to the discussion. It is wonderful to have an intelligent conversation with articulate and spirited individuals, and I just wanted to say that you're an asset to AfD. Keep up the great work! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoleetage (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re: Help with image licensing

Hi, the easiest way to do this is to have a spokesperson from the ICS e-mailing us at permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org explaining the situation. In clear, they need to state that the photographer (it would be nice to have his name btw, in order to give proper credits) and copyright owner gave the complete rights of the photography to the organization, and that they are entitled to release all these rights into the public domain, for all purposes. I don't think more proof would be needed, as long as the statement is credible and comes from a verifiable e-mail address (we obviously are very wary of gmail addresses ;). I am able to read and act upon the emails coming to this mailbox, so if they wish you can email me their email address so I can have a look. -- lucasbfr ^talk 17:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy TG, Otto

I've been working on something that might be of interest to you: User:Good Olfactory/CFD. A rip-off from ProveIt's, but I want to make it more comprehensive and up-to-date. (Of course it's not yet complete as far as back-dating goes.) I thought you might find it useful or interesting at least.

Happy TG (—I assume you are an American, though I don't think I've ever heard you say for sure.) Best wishes, Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 05:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USS Iowa turret explosion

Thank you for the helpful edits to this article. Cla68 (talk) 01:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Let me know if there's anything else that you think might be helpful. Otto4711 (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CBS Reports: The Homosexuals article

I have to say, that is a wonderful article that you've worked on! I would love to help provide any information that I can on it, is there anything in particular that you're looking for, information or reference wise? Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 03:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's a problem, isn't it? It's always expensive when you're looking for it. I have the same problem with comic book and music articles. Anyway, I will go and look through newspaper archives -- the local community college campus here has a decent archive of New York Times and Newsday articles, maybe I can find something over there? I'll take a look at the other CBS Reports episode as soon as possible! Have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Tub

Hi Otto,

I have been having a discussion with another user who believes that "Hot Tub" (Drawn Together) is a notable article because it is about a television series pilot which was reviewed by USA Today and The New York Times. I had originally redirected the article to the list of Drawn Together episodes, but I recreated the article with citations from the reviews. You have since reverted the recreation of the article due to a lack of notability. Do you believe the two reviews to be insufficient in establishing notability?

Neelix (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I don't even remember doing that. I must have checked the close of the AFD and done it on that basis. Anyway, in looking at the article history and reading the proffered sources I have to say that I would not support an independent article for the episode. I don't believe that they are substantively about the episode in specific (although I can't read the LA Times article in its entirety) but instead are about the series in general There are elements about the pilot in each of the articles that I could read in their entirety but I just don't think that there's as yet sufficient material for the article to pass notability guidelines. Compare those sources to the sources available for other TV episode articles like Sugar & Spice (Picket Fences) or The Puppy Episode or some of the episodes in Category:GA-Class The Simpsons articles. Given that Drawn Together is completely unsourced, I suggest using the material that's been turned up and concentrate on improving that article. Then if the pilot or any other episode should attract future attention an article can be spun out. It may be beneficial to have a broader community discussion before going to work on it, but I don't know what the best forum for that would be. Otto4711 (talk) 19:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Accidental Killers

i find it amazing that even with all the discussion, the creator of the category (me) was never informed of the cfd. for what it's worth, i might have been that third vote. i'm wondering if it's perhaps a significant enought flaw to one again re-open the discussion. --emerson7 21:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa Turret explosion

I just noticed that the article was promoted to FA. Congratulations! It's obvious the incredible amount of work and detail you went into on this article. Thanks for the kudos in the FA discussion also. Glad I was able to help. Otto4711 (talk) 11:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help with the article. Cla68 (talk) 07:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re LGBT TV eps PR

The peer review pages are transcluded by a bot, once an hour or so. Since I dleted the second PR and reopened the first, the bot had to relist the first, which took some time. I read most of the article and will make some comments. Is the 4711 from Koelnisch Wasser (the original Eau de Cologne)? Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indirectly. The 4711 is from a tattoo found on Frank-N-Furter's leg in The Rocky Horror Picture Show, and that is from the cologne. Otto4711 (talk) 21:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you learn something new every day. I've watched that many times and never noticed a tattoo. --Kbdank71 21:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's on his right thigh and is most visible during "Sweet Transvestite" as Frank is singing the line "Well you got caught with a flat!" Also of interest is how his "BOSS" tattoo fades in and out during "I'm Going Home". Oh no...being drawn...inexorably...to DVD rack... Otto4711 (talk) 22:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - curious minds want(ed) to know (and now I am humming the Time Warp as I type - thanks) Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 22:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great job!!

Great job on Remember Last Night which I've passed for GA-status! I'm a big fan of James Whale so it's good to see a lot of hard work being put into films of his which aren't even on VHS or DVD. Keep up the great Work. (Do The Old Dark House next! ;) ) Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. I have the DVD as well and I'll try to help if you do. Cheers! Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Touché!

Well-played, sir! TJRC (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PR and FAC

Sorry about the LGBT television shows lists woes. They wouldn't work with even one lead fair use image? I thought the FLC requirements required an image. Anyway, I can't do much about those, but figured I could weigh in on the Bride FAC. The article looks good and most of my comments are questions / ideas more than "must do" items. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, there is no requirements for images in FLs just like there are no requirements for images in FAs. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, Dabomb. I always understood MOS:IMAGES Start an article with a right-aligned lead image or InfoBox. to mean articles should have at least one image. If I were picking just one fair use image for the Pre-Stonewall list it would be File:Cbshomo2.jpg - black and white, shows the man in shadows, seems to typify the era. For the 1970s I like the File:1975 Barney Miller2.jpg image, but that might just be that I liked the show and those characters. I changed my FAC comments to support as I felt they had been substantially addressed. Nice job on the Bride, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS Thanks too for the idea of the "thanks for not being a jerk" barnstar - I am smiling as the bass line intro to the Barney Miller theme runs through my head. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I like the notes added to See also for Bride of Frankenstein. Not sure why there has been no other activity or response. I hope I did not somehow offend you in my comments there - if I did cause offense, I apologize. Hope all is well with you, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No offense whatsoever, sorry you got that impression. Otto4711 (talk) 01:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good to know. Take care, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

I just saw that Bride of Frankenstein is FA now! Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on this, Otto! Well done. --Moni3 (talk) 22:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, both of you. Otto4711 (talk) 22:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noel Coward

Noel Coward has been promoted to FA. Thank you for all your help along the way. Your efforts have really helped us improve it! All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~ richly deserved ~

Thanks for all your contributions to Harry Hay's article. You've already earned a GLBT Barnstar, but i think you deserve some extra whipped~cream and a lovely berry~on~top.

~_{Teledildonix314}~^Talk~_4-1-1~ 04:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BROMANCE

i'm trying to find who wrote the etymology section to "bromance." ultimately i'm looking for the specific big brother issue it was originally used in. any help is appreciated, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Advicedrain (talk • contribs) 21:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote the section. The source doesn't specify in what issue the word first appeared. Otto4711 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

so did you yourself read "bromance" in big brother, or did you get that from somewhere else? this is dave carnie, btw, and i'm just trying to track down the actual article it was in. i'm being interviewed by OUT magazine. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Advicedrain (talk • contribs) 21:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the article you'll see that the fact is sourced with a note. The note at the bottom of the article links to the source I used. I've never read big brother magazine. Otto4711 (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

after i posted that last question, i went, "oh duh!" (i'm new to this backstage area on wiki.) yeah, i'm already trying to track down "tim elliot," the fellow who wrote that article. thanks otto. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Advicedrain (talk • contribs) 21:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gad

Gad. I don't think there's anything left to say (wink). It's funny, but it would be a lot funnier if it weren't so—what's the word in English? Oh yeah, "lame". Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 10:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish cats

Thank you for nominating these ridiculous categories already. Don't be discouraged by people like Epeefleche and Wassermann, who, I can attest, after dealing with them on numerous AfDs/CfDs, are terribly insecure about their backgrounds and toss around accusations like rice at a wedding. Bulldog123 20:26, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently admonishing User:Epeefleche here about his tone toward you in the Jewish categories discussion. I am specifically concerned about his thinly veiled allegations of anti-Semitic bias on your part. He is responding in part with an "Otto called me paranoid" defense, which is attempt to deflect the charge. That said, it really doesn't help anyone when you do that, because now you've given him the high ground. So I'll once again ask you to moderate your tone when dealing with people like that. An "I'm not going to respond to baiting" is a lot better than leveling an equally incendiary charge in response.--Mike Selinker (talk) 19:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You may remember me from such prior edits as Category:Jewish Fraudsters. I realised that what I was doing could be considered against WP:POINT and was not getting through to people. I am discussing matters with some other editors. If you refer to my talk page you will see that I am campaigning against the unfair labelling of ethnically Jewish individuals who may or may not be religious or part of the community as "Jewish" in the first sentence of their ledes. Ironically the one place I think it may be appropriate, (for the affinity fraud), is Bernard Madoff and they won't let me mention it there.

Anyway, I am campaigning also to have some categories deleted where they needlessly group people by religion or ethnicity - including Jewish chess players. I used Jewish Fraudsters to make a point, and am trying to have categories such as Scottish Criminals and Italian Fraudsters removed also. Please visit my talk page for more information. Thanks. Beganlocal (talk) 19:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I realise now that this is perhaps not the best way to achieve change on WP. I thank you for your guidance, and take heart from the fact that you were successful in having several of these labelling categories deleted. I shall not persist further in attempting to have these categories removed at the present time. Beganlocal (talk) 23:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 23:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get the mote out of the black pot's eye while simultaneously throwing stones in a glass house that is being roosted in by chickens, or something like that

Shocked—yes, SHOCKED—am I that a user would deign to make CfD a forum for humor and lightmindedness! It is so clear to me that the broken and dysfunctional IHATEIT/CfD system needs to be swept clean with the disinfectant of mixed metaphors and haughty self-righteousness. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

08/13/2009

It's obsessive control freaks like you that make Wikipedia a wretched place. --71.225.231.155 (talk) 02:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah! Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 02:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do what I can... Otto4711 (talk) 09:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I go away for awhile and Otto turns into an OCF? When did this happen? --Kbdank71 13:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of overweight actors in United States cinema

You edited this article. This is a friendly notice that your input would be welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of overweight actors in United States cinema. This information is provided without any request that you support or oppose the deletion of the article. Thanks. Edison (talk) 04:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ted Schmidt

I have nominated Ted Schmidt, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Schmidt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Skarebo (talk) 12:50, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox:Stalker

Just a friendly note on Userbox:Stalker. You (perhaps inadvertently) wound up moving this userbox to mainspace; Wikipedia:USERBOX#Which_namespace.3F says user boxes should only be in User, Template, or Project space, so I boldly moved it back to User:Otto4711/Stalker. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Tpcover.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tpcover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CFD

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 October 28#Category:Manifestations of God in the Bahá'í Faith. Please comment. 170.160.9.3 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]

GA review for The Rejected

Hi, Otto4711, I've posted preliminary comments at Talk:The Rejected/GA1. At present I think we need to discuss possible gaps in coverage, then we can move forward once we agree where the coverage issues are going. --Philcha (talk) 18:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Otto4711, it passed. --Philcha (talk) 20:52, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lesbian kiss episode

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lesbian kiss episode. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesbian kiss episode. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any good reason for undoing my latest edit to this article? I cannot see one, unless you are going title this article as a list. Flyer22 (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of mainstream films with unsimulated sex

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of mainstream films with unsimulated sex, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mainstream films with unsimulated sex (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:56, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of post-Ellen American television episodes with LGBT themes

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of post-Ellen American television episodes with LGBT themes. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of post-Ellen American television episodes with LGBT themes. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:30daysryan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:30daysryan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ellengay.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ellengay.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Otto4711! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 729 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Angie Hardy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gerald Clarke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Frank Browning (author) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Snipergate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Snipergate. Since you had some involvement with the Snipergate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Horologium (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Horologium (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, Otto. I was very glad to see your name on a recent CfD nomination. I don't prowl the CfDs as much anymore but when I do I've really missed your wit and wisdom. I know you took some time away, and so I wanted to extend to you a warm welcome "back." best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Radical Faerie category

Thanks for your comments on the Radical Faerie category. I'm somewhat new to Wikipedia, but was hoping you could help. Since it would be easy to document with independent sources the participation of each of the individuals in the category who do not currently list Radical Faerie membership in their article, would your concern regarding the category be answered if such additions were made to the articles that don't currently include them? I took a quick look at the articles that lack Radical Faerie mention, and it would be easy to document this. Thoughts? Harveymilk (talk) 04:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nathan Fields

The article Nathan Fields has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant sources, no real claim of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Will Beback talk 01:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bride of Frankenstein

There are only three nominations on WP:TFAR right now, so now would be a great time to submit your nomination. See Calathan's comment here first, though. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment here. The decathalon article needs to be removed, not Chamberlain (if you still want to go ahead with the TFA request). Dabomb87 (talk) 01:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your comments where you nominated this to be featured on the main page, related to FA etc. Don't let people get you down mate - ain't worth the time. LuciferMorgan (talk) 18:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I hope you'll come back and stand by your nomination. You would be very welcome to. I'm sorry we had a disagreement.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

FYI, I asked some questions of the administrator who concluded the nomination of Category:Captives held in "the dark prison".

In that comment I stated that I think you made some mistakes. For the record I've assumed they were good faith mistakes.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't mean to write over the rest of your page. I don't think I was warned of an edit conflict... Geo Swan (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a ReviewerHello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]Joan Crawford[1] I agree, I nearly removed it myself. I see no encyclopedic value to a picture of a house she used to live in. Wildhartlivie (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]SigNo worries, if it's an issue, then I'm sure it can be limited in future occasions. Ideally, multiple people would have joined in on that discussion, and the signature would have blended into everything else. Unfortunately, getting multiple editors to contribute to such a daunting task can be difficult. Hopefully my signature wouldn't scare editors from contributing though. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Black Top Records albums

Category:Black Top Records albums, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kid RawhideHi. I've started a discussion on the matter here. Would you please participate? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]GraboidIf you want to nominate Graboid for AfD, you need to complete the tag properly as it currently directs to an archived AfD. Taroaldo (talk) 01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Alexis FieldsExactly why are you asking for deletion? Alexis Fields is notable actress according to WP:ENT and the page is properly referenced, not a lot of references but they are there none the less. And just because the page was deleted several times doesn't mean anything, the article was just not properly sourced the first or few more times around. Please reconsider. QuasyBoy (talk) 18:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Dracula's DaughterHi, I saw your comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Spotlight cleanup listing/Images (sorry for the delay of your June 20 addition) regarding the current image being used at Dracula's Daughter. I found the public domain trailer online and was able to upload multiple images of the cast. I added a link to the category available on Wikimedia Commons to the film article. I think that we can now replace File:Ddlili.jpg with File:NanGrayGloriaHoldenDraculasDaughterTrailerScreenshot1936.jpg. The image matches up with the quote by Breen in the "Lesbian implications" section focuses on the decision to switch from nudity to just showing the shoulders for Grey. Since we would have a free image to support that section, I don't think we would need the current one that is included. Feel free to add the other Commons images throughout the article if you wish. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]I don't agree. The current image illustrates the menacing nature of the interaction and is much better framed. Otto4711 (talk) 22:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] If the section is for talking about the lesbian implications, then the current image doesn't really convey anything. It shows two women standing next to each other, which doesn't really enhance the reader's understanding. Just looking at the image, it appears that Zaleska may be able to strangle her. If there was a video clip of the sequence, that would make more sense. The fact that we have a free equivalent to still support that section should help clarify the quote for the readers. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]File:Voxvamp.jpgHi, I nominated the image for deletion because of WP:NFCC#8 and removed it as replaceable from the actor page per WP:NFCC#1. Regards Hekerui (talk) 09:57, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]