Jump to content

Jiddu Krishnamurti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 12.196.0.50 (talk) at 02:43, 16 December 2010 (→‎{{anchor|family}} Family background and childhood: Language.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jiddu Krishnamurti
J. Krishnamurti, 1924
BornMay 12, 1895 (1895-05-12)
DiedFebruary 17, 1986 (1986-02-18) (aged 90)
Occupation(s)public speaker, author, philosopher
Parent(s)Narainiah and Sanjeevamma Jiddu

Jiddu Krishnamurti (Telugu: జిడ్డు కృష్ణ మూర్తి) or J. Krishnamurti (Telugu: జే . కృష్ణ మూర్తి, Tamil: கிருஷ்ணமூர்த்தி), (12 May 1895 – 17 February 1986) was a writer and speaker on philosophical and spiritual issues. His subject matter included psychological revolution, the nature of the mind, meditation, human relationships, and bringing about positive change in society. Maintaining that society is ultimately the product of the interactions of individuals, he held that fundamental societal change can emerge only through freely undertaken radical change in the individual. He constantly stressed the need for a revolution in the psyche of every human being and emphasized that such revolution cannot be brought about by any external entity, be it religious, political, or social.

Krishnamurti was born into a Telugu Brahmin family in what was then colonial India. In early adolescence, while living next to the Theosophical Society headquarters at Adyar in Madras, he encountered prominent occultist and Theosophist Charles Webster Leadbeater. He was subsequently raised under the tutelage of Leadbeater and Annie Besant, leaders of the Society at the time, who believed him to be the likely "vehicle" for an expected World Teacher. As a young man, he disavowed this idea and dissolved the worldwide organization (the Order of the Star) established to support it. Denouncing the concept of saviors, spiritual leaders, or any other intermediaries to reality, he urged people to directly discover the underlying causes of the problems facing individuals and society. Such discovery he considered as being within reach of everyone, irrespective of background, ability, or disposition. He declared allegiance to no nationality, caste, religion, or philosophy, and spent the rest of his life traveling the world as an independent individual speaker, speaking to large and small groups, as well as with interested individuals. He authored a number of books, among them The First and Last Freedom, The Only Revolution, and Krishnamurti's Notebook. In addition, a large collection of his talks and discussions have been published. His last public talk was in Madras, India, in January 1986, a month before his death at his home in Ojai, California.

Supporters, working through several non-profit foundations, oversee a number of independent schools centered on his views on education – in India, the UK, and the United States – and continue to transcribe and distribute many of his thousands of talks, group and individual discussions, and other writings, publishing them in a variety of formats including print, audio, video and digital media as well as online, in many languages.

Biography

Family background and childhood

Jiddu[1] Krishnamurti came from a family of Telugu-speaking Brahmins.[2] His father, Jiddu Narainiah, was employed as an official of the then colonial British Administration. Krishnamurti was very fond of his mother Sanjeevamma, who died when he was ten.[3] His parents were second cousins, having a total of eleven children, only six of whom survived childhood.[4] They were strict vegetarians, shunning eggs, and throwing away any food that the "shadow of a European" had crossed.[5]

He was born on 12 May[6] 1895 in the small town of Madanapalle in Chittoor District in Andhra Pradesh. In accordance with common Hindu practice, as an eighth child who happened to be male, he was named after the Hindu deity Krishna.[7]

In 1903 the family settled in Cudappah, where Krishnamurti during a previous stay had contracted malaria, a disease with which he would suffer recurrent bouts over many years.[8] He was a sensitive and sickly child; "vague and dreamy", he was often taken to be mentally retarded, and was beaten regularly at school by his teachers and at home by his father.[9] Several decades later Krishnamurti referred to his state of mind during childhood: "Ever since he was a boy it had been like that, no thought entered his mind. He was watching and listening and nothing else. Thought with its associations never arose. There was no image-making ... He attempted often to think but no thought would come."[10][11] Writing about his childhood and early adolescence in memoirs he composed when he was eighteen years old, Krishnamurti described psychic experiences such as "seeing" his sister, who had died in 1904, and also his mother, who had died in 1905.[12] Elsewhere he mentions another aspect of his childhood - a bond and closeness with nature - that apparently persisted throughout his life: "He always had this strange lack of distance between himself and the trees, rivers and mountains. It wasn't cultivated."[13] His biographers describe among his other childhood traits an innate generosity and a "religious vein".[14]

Krishnamurti's father Narainiah retired at the end of 1907, and being of limited means wrote to Annie Besant,[15] then President of the Theosophical Society, seeking employment at its headquarters estate at Adyar. The Society, a quasi-mystical organization founded 1875 in New York City, had attracted international media and public interest and was then influential in Indian society;[16] in addition to being an observant orthodox Brahmin, Narainiah had been a Theosophist since 1882.[17] He was eventually hired by the Society as a clerk, and he and four sons (his remaining family) moved there in January 1909.[18] Narainiah and his sons were at first assigned a small dilapidated cottage located just outside the Theosophical compound, and which lacked adequate sanitation. The living arrangements exacerbated the boys' already "shocking physical condition", Krishnamurti and his brothers having arrived at Adyar undernourished, covered in mosquito bites, and infested with lice.[19]

His "discovery" and its consequences

It was in late April or early May[20] 1909, a few months after the last move, that Krishnamurti first met influential Theosophist Charles Webster Leadbeater.[21] During regular walks to the Theosophical estate's beach at the nearby Adyar river, Leadbeater, who claimed clairvoyance, had noticed Krishnamurti (who also frequented the beach with others) and was impressed by the "most wonderful aura he had ever seen, without a particle of selfishness in it."[22] In contrast, Krishnamurti's outward appearance was according to eyewitnesses pretty common, unimpressive, and unkempt. He was also considered "particularly dim-witted"; he often had "a vacant expression" that "gave him an almost moronic look". Leadbeater remained "unshaken" that the boy would become "a spiritual teacher and a great orator", and likely to be used as the "vehicle for the Lord Maitreya" - the latter, according to Theosophical doctrine, an advanced spiritual entity that periodically appears on earth as a World Teacher to guide the evolution of humankind. This would happen, Leadbeater added, "unless something went wrong".[23]

Pupul Jayakar, in her biography of Krishnamurti,[24] quotes him speaking of that period in his life some 75 years later: "The boy had always said, 'I will do whatever you want'. There was an element of subservience, obedience. The boy was vague, uncertain, woolly; he didn't seem to care what was happening. He was like a vessel, with a large hole in it, whatever was put in, went through, nothing remained."[25]

Following his "discovery"[26] Krishnamurti was taken under the wing of the leadership of the Theosophical Society in Adyar and their inner circle. Leadbeater and a small number of trusted associates undertook the task of educating, protecting, and in general preparing him as the likely "vehicle" of the expected World Teacher. Krishnamurti (or Krishnaji as he was often called)[27] and his younger brother Nityananda ("Nitya", 1898–1925) were privately tutored at the Theosophical compound in Madras, and were later exposed to a comparatively opulent lifestyle among a segment of European high society, as they continued their education abroad. In spite of his history of problems with school work and concerns about his capacities and physical condition, the fourteen-year-old Krishnamurti within six months was able to speak and write competently in English.[28] He later came to view his "discovery" as a life-saving event: "Krishna [Krishnamurti] was often asked in later life what he thought would have happened to him if he had not been 'discovered' by Leadbeater. He would unhesitatingly reply, 'I would have died'."[29]

During this time Krishnamurti had developed a strong bond with Annie Besant, and considered her a surrogate mother.[30] Following his early close relationship with his biological mother, this was the first of several important and intimate relationships that Krishnamurti established with women during his lifetime. His father, who had initially assented to Besant's legal guardianship of Krishnamurti,[31] was pushed into the background by the swirl of attention around his son and in 1912 sued Besant and the Theosophical Society to protect his parental interests. After a protracted legal battle, Besant took custody of Krishnamurti and Nitya.[32][33] As a result of this separation from his family and home, Krishnamurti and his brother (whose relationship had always been very close) became more dependent on each other, and in the following years they often traveled together.[34]

In 1911 the leadership of the Theosophical Society at Adyar established a new organization, called the Order of the Star in the East (OSE) to prepare the world for the expected appearance of the World Teacher. Krishnamurti was named as its head, while senior Theosophists were installed in its various other positions. Membership was open to anyone who accepted the doctrine of the Coming of the World Teacher – however, most of the early members were also members of the Theosophical Society.[35] Controversy erupted soon after, within the Theosophical Society and without, in Hindu circles, and in the Indian and international press.[32][36]

Growing up

Mary Lutyens, in her biography of Krishnamurti, states that there was a time when he fully believed that he was to become the World Teacher after correct spiritual and secular guidance and education.[37] Another biographer describes the daily program imposed on him by Leadbeater and his associates, which included rigorous exercise and sports, tutoring in a variety of school subjects, Theosophical and religious lessons, yoga and meditation, as well as instruction in proper hygiene and in the ways of British society and culture.[38] At the same time, Leadbeater personally assumed the role of guide in a parallel, mystical instruction of young Krishnamurti; the existence and progress of this instruction was at the time known only to the leadership of the Society and a close-knit circle of associates.[39]

Unlike sports, in which he showed natural aptitude, Krishnamurti always had problems with formal schooling and was not academically inclined. He eventually gave up university education after several attempts at admission. He did take to foreign languages, in time speaking several (French and Italian among them) with some fluency. In this period he apparently enjoyed reading parts of the Old Testament, and was impressed by some of the Western classics, especially works by Shelley, Dostoyevsky and Nietzsche.[40] He also had, since childhood, considerable observational and mechanical skills, being able to correctly disassemble and reassemble complicated machinery.[41]

His public image as originally cultivated by the Theosophists "was to be characterized by a well-polished exterior, a sobriety of purpose, a cosmopolitan outlook and an otherworldly, almost beatific detachment in his demeanor."[42] And in fact, "all of these can be said to have characterized Krishnamurti's public image to the end of his life."[42] It was apparently clear early on that he "possessed an innate personal magnetism, not of a warm physical variety, but nonetheless emotive in its austerity, and inclined to inspire veneration."[43] However, as Krishnamurti was growing up, he showed signs of adolescent rebellion and emotional instability, chafing at the regimen imposed on him, being highly uncomfortable with the publicity surrounding him, and occasionally having doubts about the future prescribed him.[44]

Krishnamurti and Nitya were taken to England for the first time in April 1911. Two of the people they first encountered there were Mary Lutyens, Krishnamurti's future biographer and lifelong friend, and her mother Emily - who was to become another surrogate mother for Krishnamurti, forming a strong and intimate bond with him.[45] During this trip Krishnamurti gave his first public speech, to young members of the OSE in London.[46] The first writings of his had also started to appear, published in booklets by the Theosophical Society and in Theosophical and OSE-affiliated magazines.[47] Between 1911 and the start of World War I in 1914, the brothers visited several other European countries, always accompanied by Theosophist chaperones.[48] Meanwhile Krishnamurti had for the first time acquired a measure of personal financial independence, thanks to a lifetime annuity provided by a wealthy benefactress.[49]

After the war, Krishnamurti (again accompanied by Nitya, by then the "Organizing Secretary" of the Order)[50] embarked on a series of lectures, meetings and discussions around the world related to his duties as the head of the OSE, and also continued writing.[51] Like most of his contemporary writings, the content of his talks revolved around the work of the Order and of its members in preparation for the Coming, while his vocabulary reflected the prevailing Theosophical concepts and terminology. In the beginning he was described as a halting, hesitant, and repetitive speaker, but there was steady improvement in his delivery and confidence, and he gradually took command of the meetings.[52]

In early 1921 he became ill with bronchitis while in France, a condition that "almost became chronic."[53] He also fell in love for the first time—in September 1921 with Helen Knothe, a seventeen-year-old American whose family was involved in the Theosophical Society. The experience was tempered by the realization that his work and expected life-mission precluded what would otherwise be considered normal relationships, and by the mid-1920s the two of them had "drifted apart".[54]

Start of "the process" and the death of Nitya

In 1922 Krishnamurti and Nitya travelled from Sydney to California on their way to Switzerland. While in California, they stayed at a cottage in the relatively secluded Ojai Valley, offered to them for the occasion by an American member of the Order. It was thought that the area's unique climate would be beneficial to Nitya, who had been diagnosed with tuberculosis; Nitya's often-ailing health would become a near constant source of worry for Krishnamurti.[55] At Ojai they met Rosalind Williams, a young American who became close to them both, and who was to later have a significant role in Krishnamurti's life.[56] For the first time the brothers were without immediate supervision by their Theosophical Society minders; they spent their time in nature hikes and picnics with friends, spiritual contemplation, and planning their course within the World Teacher Project.[57] Krishnamurti and Nitya found the Ojai Valley to be very agreeable, and eventually a trust formed by supporters purchased for them the cottage and surrounding property, which henceforth became Krishnamurti's official place of residence.[58]

It was in August–September 1922, during the initial stay at Ojai, that Krishnamurti went through an intense, "life-changing" experience.[59] It has been simultaneously and invariably characterised as a spiritual awakening, a psychological transformation, and a physical conditioning. The initial events happened in two distinct phases: first a three-day spiritual experience which apparently lead, two weeks later, to a longer-lasting condition that Krishnamurti and those around him would refer to as the process; this condition would recur, at frequent intervals and with varying intensity, until his death.[60][61]

According to witnesses it all started on 17 August 1922, with Krishnamurti complaining of extraordinary pain at the nape of his neck and a hard, ball-like swelling. Over the next couple of days the symptoms worsened, with increasing pain, extreme physical discomfort and sensitivity, total loss of appetite and occasional delirious ramblings. Then, he seemed to lapse into unconsciousness; instead he recounted that he was very much aware of his surroundings, and that while in that state he had an experience of mystical union.[62] The following day the symptoms and the experience intensified, climaxing with a sense of "immense peace".[63]

I was supremely happy, for I had seen. Nothing could ever be the same. I have drunk at the clear and pure waters and my thirst was appeased... I have seen the Light. I have touched compassion which heals all sorrow and suffering; it is not for myself, but for the world... Love in all its glory has intoxicated my heart; my heart can never be closed. I have drunk at the fountain of Joy and eternal Beauty. I am God-intoxicated.[64]

Following - and apparently related to - these events,[65] in early September a strange condition, which came to be known as the process, started as an almost nightly, regular, occurrence. These new incidents continued with short intermissions until October; later, the process would resume intermittently. As in the separate three-day experience of August, the process involved varying degrees of pain, physical discomfort and sensitivity, occasionally a lapse into a "childlike" state, and sometimes an apparent fading out of consciousness explained - by Krishnamurti or those attending him - as either his body giving in to pain, or as him "going off".[66]

These experiences were accompanied, or followed, by what was interchangeably described as presence, benediction, immensity, and sacredness, a state distinct from the process. This state - said to have been often felt by others present - would later, and increasingly, often reoccur independently of the process. Krishnamurti regularly substituted the other or the otherness as shorthand description for this particular experience; also as a way of conveying the sense of impenetrability regarding this otherness, the strange sensibility it effected, and the unusual state of consciousness it precipitated, as described in his diaries and elsewhere.[67]

Several explanations have been proposed for the events of 1922 and for the process in general.[68] Leadbeater and other Theosophists expected the "vehicle" to have certain paranormal experiences, but were nevertheless mystified by these developments and unable to explain the whole thing.[69] During Krishnamurti's later years the continuing process often came up as a subject in private discussions between himself and his closest associates; these discussions shed some light on the subject, but were ultimately inconclusive regarding its nature and provenance.[70] Whatever the case, the process, and the inability of Leadbeater to explain it satisfactorily, if at all, had other consequences according to biographer Roland Vernon:

The process at Ojai, whatever its cause or validity, was a cataclysmic milestone for Krishna. Up until this time his spiritual progress, chequered though it might have been, had been planned with solemn deliberation by Theosophy's grandees... Something new had now occurred for which Krishna's training had not entirely prepared him... A burden was lifted from his conscience and he took his first step towards becoming an individual... In terms of his future role as a teacher, the process was his bedrock... It had come to him alone and had not been planted in him by his mentors ... it provided Krishna with the soil in which his newfound spirit of confidence and independence could take root.[71]

Nitya's persistent health problems had periodically resurfaced throughout this time[72] and were a continuing cause for concern; on 13 November 1925, at age 27, he died in Ojai from complications of influenza and tuberculosis.[73] Despite Nitya's poor health, his death was completely unexpected by Krishnamurti, and fundamentally shook his belief in Theosophy and his faith in the leaders of the Theosophical Society.[74] Jayakar wrote that "his belief in the Masters and the hierarchy had undergone a total revolution."[75] Moreover, Nitya had been the "last surviving link to his family and childhood... The only person to whom he could talk openly, his best friend and companion".[76] According to eyewitness accounts the news "broke him completely".[77] He struggled for days to overcome his sorrow: "Day after day we watched him heart-broken, disillusioned. Day after day he seemed to change, gripping himself together to face life ... He was going through an inner revolution, finding new strength."[77] Jayakar stated that in later years "Krishnamurti accepted that perhaps the intensity of sorrow had triggered a vast, wordless perception"[75] while Vernon suggests that in the end, "[Krishnamurti] discovered, at the root of sorrow, an emptiness that could be not be touched by hurt".[76] Twelve days after Nitya's death he was "immensely quiet, radiant, and free of all sentiment and emotion";[75] "there was not a shadow ... to show what he had been through."[78] The experience of his brother's death seems to have shattered any remaining illusions, and a "new vision" was now "coming into being":

An old dream is dead and a new one is being born, as a flower that pushes through the solid earth. A new vision is coming into being and a greater consciousness is being unfolded ... A new strength, born of suffering, is pulsating in the veins and a new sympathy and understanding is being born of past suffering - a greater desire to see others suffer less, and, if they must suffer, to see that they bear it nobly and come out of it without too many scars. I have wept, but I do not want others to weep; but if they do, I know what it means.[79]

Break with the past

Over the next few years Krishnamurti's new vision and consciousness continued to develop. New concepts appeared in his talks, discussions, and correspondence, together with an evolving vocabulary that was progressively free of Theosophical terminology.[80] The main themes in his meetings started to diverge from the well-defined tenets of Theosophy and from the concrete steps the members of the Order of the Star had to undertake, and into more abstract and flexible concepts, which would be Happiness one year, Questioning Authority the next, or Liberation the following.[81] His new direction reached a climax in 1929, when he rebuffed attempts by Leadbeater and Besant to continue with the Order of the Star. Krishnamurti dissolved the Order during the annual Star Camp at Ommen, the Netherlands, on 3 August 1929[82] in front of Annie Besant, three thousand members, and a radio audience.[83] In the so-called Dissolution Speech, he stated that he made his decision after "careful consideration" during the previous two years, and said among other things:

You may remember the story of how the devil and a friend of his were walking down the street, when they saw ahead of them a man stoop down and pick up something from the ground, look at it, and put it away in his pocket. The friend said to the devil, "What did that man pick up?" "He picked up a piece of the truth," said the devil. "That is a very bad business for you, then," said his friend. "Oh, not at all," the devil replied, "I am going to help him organize it." I maintain that truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organized; nor should any organization be formed to lead or coerce people along a particular path.[84]

and also:

This is no magnificent deed, because I do not want followers, and I mean this. The moment you follow someone you cease to follow Truth. I am not concerned whether you pay attention to what I say or not. I want to do a certain thing in the world and I am going to do it with unwavering concentration. I am concerning myself with only one essential thing: to set man free. I desire to free him from all cages, from all fears, and not to found religions, new sects, nor to establish new theories and new philosophies.[84]

Following the dissolution some prominent Theosophists turned against Krishnamurti, including Leadbeater, who reputedly stated that "the Coming had gone wrong".[85] Mary Lutyens wrote that "after all the years of proclaiming the Coming, of stressing over and over again the danger of rejecting the World Teacher when he came because he was bound to say something wholly new and unexpected, something contrary to most people’s preconceived ideas and hopes,... the leaders of Theosophy, one after the other, fell into the trap against which they had so unremittingly warned others."[86]

Krishnamurti had denounced all organized belief, the notion of gurus, and the whole teacher-follower relationship, vowing instead to work in setting people "absolutely, unconditionally free".[84] There is no record of him explicitly denying he was the World Teacher ;[87] whenever he was asked to clarify his position, he either asserted the matter was irrelevant,[88] or gave answers that, as he stated, were vague on purpose.[89] In reflection of the ongoing changes in his outlook, he had started doing so before the dissolution of the Order of the Star.[90] The subtlety of the new distinctions on the World Teacher issue was lost on many of his admirers, who were already bewildered or distraught because of the changes in Krishnamurti’s outlook, vocabulary and pronouncements – among them Annie Besant and Mary Lutyens' mother Emily.[91] He eventually disassociated himself from the Theosophical Society and its teachings and practices,[92] yet he remained on cordial terms with some of its members and ex-members throughout his life.

Krishnamurti would often refer to the totality of his work as the teachings and not as my teachings. His concern was always about the teachings; the teacher had no importance, and all authority, especially psychological authority, was denounced:

All authority of any kind, especially in the field of thought and understanding, is the most destructive, evil thing. Leaders destroy the followers and followers destroy the leaders. You have to be your own teacher and your own disciple. You have to question everything that man has accepted as valuable, as necessary.[93]

This includes inward authority:

Having realized that we can depend on no outside authority ... there is the immensely greater difficulty of rejecting our own inward authority, the authority of our own particular little experiences and accumulated opinions, knowledge, ideas and ideals.[94]

However such pronouncements were not endorsements of social or personal disorder; on the contrary, the total freedom he advocated, rather than leading to societal and personal disorder would in his view result in complete order:

Order is necessary, complete, absolute, inward order and that is not possible if there is no virtue, and virtue is the natural outcome of freedom. But freedom is not doing what you want to do nor is it revolting against the established order, adopting a laissez faire attitude to life or becoming a hippy. Freedom comes into being only when we understand, not intellectually but actually, our every day life, our activity, our way of thought, the fact of our brutality, our callousness and indifference; it is to be actually in contact with our colossal selfishness.[95]

He furthermore declared that such understanding on the part of individuals, if genuine, should produce an impact on society as a whole by default:

That is the only way to judge: in what way are you freer, greater, more dangerous to every Society which is based on the false and the unessential?... those who really desire to understand,... will be a danger to everything that is unessential, to unrealities, to shadows.[84]

Krishnamurti resigned from the various trusts and other organizations that were affiliated with the defunct Order of the Star, including the Theosophical Society. He returned the monies and properties donated to the Order, among them a castle in the Netherlands and 5,000 acres (20 km2) of land,[96] to their donors.[97] He spent the rest of his life holding dialogues and giving public talks around the world on the nature of belief, truth, sorrow, freedom, death, and the quest for a spiritually fulfilled life. He accepted neither followers nor worshipers, regarding the relationship between disciple and guru as encouraging dependency and exploitation. He accepted gifts and financial support freely offered to him by people inspired by his work, and continued with lecture tours and the publication of books and talk transcripts for more than half a century.[98] He constantly urged people to think independently and clearly. He invited them to "easily, affably" explore and discuss specific topics together with him, "as two friends"[99] who, in a break with the past, make a fresh start towards a "journey of discovery":

And to take such a journey we must travel light; we cannot be burdened with opinions, prejudices and conclusions - all that old furniture ... forget all you know about yourself; forget all you have ever thought about yourself; we are going to start as if we knew nothing.[100]

Middle years

From 1930 through 1944 Krishnamurti engaged in speaking tours and in the issue of publications under the auspice of the Star Publishing Trust (SPT), in which he was involved with Rajagopalacharya Desikacharya (commonly D. Rajagopal or "Raja"), a close associate and friend from the Order of the Star.[101] The base of operations for the new enterprise was in California, where Krishnamurti, D. Rajagopal, and Rosalind Williams (by then the wife of D. Rajagopal), lived in close proximity at the Ojai property that was Krishnamurti's official residence.[102] Materially, not much changed after the dissolution of the Order; Krishnamurti "lacked for nothing, and his lifestyle remained as affluent as before" yet "there is no evidence to suggest that he was in any way dependent on material comfort."[103] The business and organizational aspects of the SPT were administered chiefly by D. Rajagopal, as Krishnamurti devoted his time to speaking and meditation, "content to leave all practical matters, which bored him, especially financial matters, in Rajagopal's undoubtebly capable hands."[104] The Rajagopals' marriage was not a happy one, and the two became physically estranged following the birth of their daughter Radha, in 1931.[105] Shortly afterwards, in the relative seclusion of Ojai, Krishnamurti's close friendship with Rosalind deepened into a love affair that continued for many years, a fact not made public until 1991.[106][107]

During this period of time the Rishi Valley School, the first of several schools based on Krishnamurti's educational ideas, opened in India.[108] This school and others in India and elsewhere continue to operate under the auspices of the Krishnamurti Foundations.[109] Proper education, incorporating a holistic approach and the rearing of children into sane, whole individuals free of conflict, had been a major, continuing concern of his.[110] He emphasized the role of educators and secondly, the overall school environment instead of specific methods or techniques, and spoke of the need to "educate the educator" into a teacher who is teaching "not for profit, not along a certain line, a teacher who is giving, growing and cultivating intelligence, because he himself is cultivating intelligence in himself."[111] However as of 1980 Krishnamurti's concern regarding right education[112] remained unsatisfied. When asked about the result of - by that time - nearly 50 years of educational work at the various Krishnamurti Schools around the world, he answered that "not a single new mind" had been created.[113]

After the dissolution of the Order of the Star and the break with Theosophy there was no falling off of the audiences attending the talks, with new people taking the place of those that abandoned him, since several of the old devotees "were unable to follow him in what seemed to them mists of abstraction."[114] New people also joined the camps, which were by then open to the general public, and Krishnamurti was invited to many new parts of the world. Mary Lutyens states that "his audiences were to become, increasingly, of a different calibre, people interested in what he had to say, not in what they had been told he was."[115]

Throughout the 1930s Krishnamurti spoke in Europe, Latin America, India, Australia and the United States, garnering favorable interest, although in a few occasions he encountered hostility or opposition during this period of growing global turmoil.[116] Another matter was the audiences' apparent inability to grasp his message; he expressed exasperation over this both privately and publicly, and one of the reasons for his shifting vocabulary was the lifelong[117] effort to convey the teaching in a way that was both precise and easy to understand.[118] He wrote to Emily Lutyens that the meetings had "quantity without quality"[119] and he was vexed by the refusal of ex-Order of the Star and Theosophical Society members to let go of the past. He acknowledged that what he was articulating could seem just like another hard-to-understand theory; he asked his audiences to act on it instead:

To awaken that intelligence there must be the deep urge to know but not to speculate. Please bear in mind that what to me is a certainty, a fact, must be to you a theory, and the mere repetition of my words does not constitute your knowledge and actuality; it can be but a hypothesis, nothing more. Only through experimentation and action can you discern for yourself its reality. Then it is of no person, neither yours nor mine.[120]

In California Krishnamurti found himself, during the 1930s and 1940s, in relative isolation and in extended stretches of solitude, a situation he apparently enjoyed and took advantage of. He engaged in long sessions of meditation, communing with nature (especially in daily walks) and in unfettered introspection and observation. He was often writing about these experiences in correspondence with friends throughout this period, describing his newly realized awareness and his desire to "build a bridge" to it for others.[121] Radha Rajagopal, then a teenager, described her impression of Krishnamurti at Ojai during 1946-47: "We all felt his quiet observation of us and in part returned it ... to have had the opportunity to experience that directly was worth a hundred of his lectures."[122] Biographers consider these activities and experiences as catalysts for the new directions and concepts in his message, and as the raw material for future talks and writings.[123] At around the same time Krishnamurti reputedly "lost his memory of the past almost entirely"; until his death he would occasionally refer to this as an ongoing condition, though one applying to memory with psychological rather than practical significance.[124]

Krishnamurti had started talking about right meditation,[125] a subject he would touch on in practically every subsequent talk or discussion.[126] He also introduced several new concepts and terms which became recurrent themes in later talks and discussions.[127] One such was the idea of choiceless awareness, a type of awareness that is from moment to moment, without the implicit or explicit choices that accompany biases and judgments.[128] Another new concept was his challenge of the existence of division between the conscious and the subconscious mind, maintaining that such division is artificial, and that in reality there is only a single consciousness.[129]

In 1938 he made the acquaintance of the English author Aldous Huxley,[130] who had arrived from Europe during 1937.[131] The two began a close friendship which endured for many years, until Huxley's death.[132] They held common concerns about the imminent conflict in Europe which they viewed as the outcome of the pernicious influence of nationalism.[133] Krishnamurti's stance on World War II was often construed as pacifism or even subversion during a time of patriotic fervor in the United States, and for a time he came under surveillance by the FBI.[134] He did not speak publicly for a period of about four years (between 1940 and 1944).[135] During this time he lived and worked quietly at the Ojai property, which during the war operated as a largely self-sustaining farm, its surplus goods donated for relief efforts in Europe.[136] Of the years spent in Ojai during the war he was later to say: "I think it was a period of no challenge, no demand, no outgoing. I think it was a kind of everything held in; and when I left Ojai it all burst."[137]

Krishnamurti broke the hiatus from public speaking in May 1944 with a series of talks in Ojai, which would again become a regular venue for his talks and discussions.[138] These talks and subsequent material were published by Krishnamurti Writings Inc (KWINC), the successor organization to the Star Publishing Trust. This was to be the new central Krishnamurti-related entity worldwide, whose purposes were the dissemination of the teaching and the administration of his itinerary.[139] Meanwhile, he continued to introduce new concepts and concerns that were to become constants in his later talks, such as the idea that there is no duality between the observer and the observed or between the thinker and the thought.[140] Related to the newly introduced concepts was the notion of actually seeing what is, which in his view coincides with non-judgemental, non-self-centered perception of reality. Krishnamurti often attached a special meaning to "seeing", implying not just physical vision or intellectual understanding, but a total perception that is inseparable from action.[141] The nature and qualities of the enquiring mind would become another favorite subject:

It seems to me that the real problem is the mind itself and not the problem which the mind has created and tries to solve. If the mind is petty, small, narrow, limited, however great and complex the problem may be, the mind approaches that problem in terms of its own pettiness... Though it has extraordinary capacities and is capable of invention, of subtle, cunning thought, the mind is still petty. It may be able to quote Marx, or the Gita, or some other religious book, but it is still a small mind, and a small mind confronted with a complex problem can only translate that problem in terms of itself, and therefore the problem, the misery increases. So the question is: Can the mind that is small, petty, be transformed into something which is not bound by its own limitations?[142]

While in Ojai in 1946, he suffered a serious kidney infection that incapacitated him for months, and at times caused those around him to fear for his life; he refused medical treatment, allowing only Rosalind Rajagopal to attend to him. The infection reappeared in later years, and he eventually agreed to be hospitalized in order for it to be treated.[143]

Krishnamurti had remained in contact with associates from India, and in October 1947 embarked upon a speaking tour there, attracting a new following of young intellectuals.[144] It was on this trip that he first encountered the sisters Pupul Jayakar and Nandini Mehta, who became lifelong associates and confidantes. The sisters subsequently attended Krishnamurti throughout a recurrence of the process that took place during a 1948 stay in Ootacamund.[145][146]

In several of these talks and discussions in India he introduced another future favorite subject and integral part of his message: the proper place of thought in daily life and the necessity, meaning, and consequence of its ceasing.[147] He considered the importance of the "ending of thought" vital in understanding reality, and in discovering the new:

Very simply put, thought is the response of memory, the past. The past is an infinity or a second ago. When thought acts it is this past which is acting as memory, as experience, as knowledge, as opportunity. All will is desire based on this past and directed towards pleasure or the avoidance of pain. When thought is functioning it is the past, therefore there is no new living at all; it is the past living in the present, modifying itself and the present. So there is nothing new in life that way, and when something new is to be found there must be the absence of the past, the mind must not be cluttered up with thought, fear, pleasure, and everything else. Only when the mind is uncluttered can the new come into being, and for this reason we say that thought must be still, operating only when it has to - objectively, efficiently. All continuity is thought; when there is continuity there is nothing new. Do you see how important this is? It's really a question of life itself. Either you live in the past, or you live totally differently: that is the whole point.[148]

In addition to such inward-looking themes, there was a social subtext in Krishnamurti's message, on which he was commenting with increasing frequency. Addressing "the evils of civil and religious power, the futility of existing social structures, the inertia of conformity, and the failure of temporizing reform... Krishnamurti had developed notions ... not found in his earlier discources. The teacher was also learning–not only answering the questions of others, but extending his own questions."[149] As he considered society the result of the interactions of its individuals members, he viewed all responses to the ever-present world crises as ineffective unless accompanied by the voluntary acceptance, on the part of each individual, of their equal responsibility for the state of the world as a whole:

And as we are - the world is. That is, if we are greedy, envious, competitive, our society will be competitive, envious, greedy, which brings misery and war. The state is what we are. To bring about order and peace, we must begin with ourselves and not with society, not with the state, for the world is ourselves. And it is not selfish to think that each one must first understand and change himself to help the world. You cannot help another unless you know yourself.[150]

At the urging of Huxley he had started to write prose again after a gap of many years.[151] In 1953, the first book of his to be published by a mainstream, commercial publisher was released;[152] practically all subsequent books of his would follow the same route thanks to interest his works generated within their publishing category. At the same time, mostly positive reviews by respected reviewers started appearing in well-regarded publications.[153] One of the elements of his contemporary and future writings were meditative, unsentimental, and succinct observations of people and nature; another, his avoidance of the first-person-singular. The majority of his writings would be in third-person, a mode that since the late 1930s he had been increasingly using in his talks and dialogues. He remarked that this was done in a deliberate attempt to divert attention from the messenger to the message,[154] in accord with his often declared view that only the teaching - and not the personality of the teacher - mattered.[155]

Krishnamurti continued to attract audiences in public lectures and individuals in personal interviews.[156] He had remained popular in India, where there had been a long tradition of wandering "holy" men, hermits, and independent religious teachers; a number of contemporary ones met with Krishnamurti, or otherwise regarded him favorably.[157] Krishnamurti had a "special tenderness for the true sannyasi or Buddhist monk", yet he consistently and unequivocally criticized their "rituals, disciplines, and practices".[158] He became friendly and in the following decades had a number of discussions with well known Hindu and Buddhist scholars and leaders; several of these discussions were later published in print and other formats.[159] He also met with other prominent personalities in India, including the then young Lhamo Dondrub (Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama)[160] and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.[161]

Later years

Krishnamurti continued speaking around the world in public lectures, group discussions, and with concerned individuals.[162] His inner life was also active, with continuing occurrences of the process throughout 1961, first while in Great Britain and then in Switzerland.[163] In the early 1960s he made the acquaintance of physicist David Bohm,[164] whose philosophical and scientific concerns regarding the essence of the physical world and the psychological and sociological state of humankind found parallels in Krishnamurti's philosophy. The two men soon became close friends, and started a common inquiry in the form of personal dialogues - and in group discussions with other participants - that periodically continued over nearly two decades.[165] Several of these discussions were later published in a variety of formats and introduced a wider audience (among scientists) to Krishnamurti's ideas than was previously the case.[166] Also through Bohm, Krishnamurti met and engaged in discussion with several other members of the scientific community.[167] Their long friendship went through a rocky interval in later years, and although they overcame their differences and remained friends until Krishnamurti's death, the relationship did not reattain its previous intensity.[168] However one result of Krishnamurti's contact with Bohm and the scientific community was the introduction of greater precision in his vocabulary, and the carefully defined use of terms such as consciousness.[169]

In the early 1960s his associates again started noticing deep changes in Krishnamurti. Jayakar wrote that "he would never be the same again. The Krishnaji who had laughed with us, walked with us ... this Krishnaji would vanish. A new Krishnaji would emerge - stern, impatient, questioning... He would be compassionate, but he would also be the teacher, demanding answers to fundamental questions. All great laughter and play had ended."[170] His audience was also changing: reflecting the cultural changes of the 1960s, which included an intensified search for alternative lifestyles and experiences, there was a noticeable influx of young people in his talks and discussions, while his books, both new titles and older, generated renewed and wider interest.[171] Krishnamurti’s evolving philosophy apparently proved too austere and rigorous for many of the new young participants; however new regular gatherings, such as the ones at Saanen, Switzerland, eventually became a focus for "serious ... people concerned with the enormous challenges to humankind".[172] Noting the unceasing global turmoil, he continued to tackle societal issues and to emphasize the effects of individual transformation on society and the world as a whole:

I think it is important ... that we should understand ourselves totally and completely, because ... we are the world, and the world is us... I condemn, judge, evaluate, and say, 'this is right, wrong, this is good, this is bad' according to the culture, the tradition, the knowledge, the experience which the observer has gathered. Therefore it prevents the observation of the living thing, which is the 'me'... When the Muslim says he is a Muslim, he is the past, conditioned by the culture in which he has been brought up. Or the Catholic, Communist. You follow?... So when we talk about living we are talking about living in the past. And therefore there is conflict between the past and the present, because I am conditioned as a Muslim, or god knows what, and I cannot meet the living present, which demands that I break down my conditioning... And in the past there is security. Right? My house, my wife, my belief, my status, my position, my fame, my blasted little self - in that there is great safety, security. And I am asking, can the mind observe without any of that?... Therefore the mind is totally free. And you say, what is the point of that being free? The point is: such a mind has no conflict. And such a mind is completely quiet and peaceful, not violent. And such a mind can create a new culture - a new culture, not a counter-culture of the old, but a totally different thing altogether, where we shall have no conflict at all.[173]

Along with his changing audience and outlook, Krishnamurti's subject matter had evolved to encompass several new and different concepts: the idea that individuality is an illusion,[174] the notion that true love, beauty, peace, and goodness, have no opposites - such duality being only a construct of thought[175] - and the need for a radical psychosomatic mutation.[176] In the early 1970s he mentioned that the new approach represented an "unfolding ... the teaching is in the same direction", but "it is holistic rather than an examination of detail."[169] As far as he was concerned the fundamental teachings remained unchanged. He denied that there had been any "inner change" in himself, or any evolution in the teaching, "since the beginning". The only changes he admitted were in "expression, vocabulary, language, and gesture."[177] This was in line with one of Krishnamurti's later themes, the non-existence of psychological time, by which he refuted any psychological, inward, evolution or "becoming".[178] In late 1980, he took the opportunity to reaffirm the basic elements of his message in a written statement that came to be known as the Core of the Teaching. An excerpt follows:

The core of Krishnamurti's teaching is contained in the statement he made in 1929 when he said: "Truth is a pathless land". Man cannot come to it through any organization, through any creed, through any dogma, priest or ritual, nor through any philosophical knowledge or psychological technique. He has to find it through the mirror of relationship, through the understanding of the contents of his own mind, through observation, and not through intellectual analysis or introspective dissection. Man has built in himself images as a sense of security - religious, political, personal. These manifest as symbols, ideas, beliefs. The burden of these dominates man's thinking, relationships and his daily life. These are the causes of our problems for they divide man from man in every relationship.[179]

In the 1970s Krishnamurti met several times with then Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, with whom he had far ranging, and apparently serious discussions. His true impact on Indian political life is unknown; however Jayakar considers his attitude and message in these meetings as a possible influence in the lifting of certain emergency measures Gandhi had imposed during periods of political turmoil.[180]

During the late 1960s and early 1970s Krishnamurti and his associates reorganized previous institutions into four geographically dispersed non-profit Foundations, designated the Official bodies responsible for preserving and disseminating the teachings, and for sponsoring the schools.[181] Meanwhile, Krishnamurti's once close relationship with the Rajagopals had deteriorated to the point where Krishnamurti took D. Rajagopal to court in order to recover donated property and funds, publication rights for his works, manuscripts, and personal correspondence, that were in D. Rajagopal's possession. The litigation and ensuing cross complaints, which formally began 1971, continued for many years. A substantial portion of materials and property was returned to Krishnamurti during his lifetime; the parties to this litigation finally settled all other matters in 1986, shortly after his death.[182][183]

Beginning in the late 1960s and continuing until his death, Krishnamurti and close associates engaged in private discussions - some of which have been at least partially made public[184] - regarding himself, his "discovery", his later development, the meaning of the continuing process,[185] and the source of the teaching. It seemed that Krishnamurti "in later life begun to delve into the mystery of his background in an attempt to come to terms with his own uniqueness."[186] The discussions also broached subjects that Krishnamurti would not usually approach in public, such as the existence of evil,[187] a feeling of protection he had,[188] or the nature of the otherness – the non-personified presence that he, and sometimes others around him, felt.[189] The discussions did not reach any conclusions; Krishnamurti several times stated that he did not know what the truth was relative to these inquiries, and whether he could, or should, find it out. He nevertheless examined several approaches, some of which he considered more likely than others.[190] He insisted that he did not want to make a "mystery" out of all this; Mary Lutyens comments, "yet ... a mystery remains."[191]

In early 1980 he reported that his continuing, "uninvited and unsought" inner experiences, apart from increasing in intensity had taken a qualitative leap into a "totally different and new" stage. He described it by saying that "the movement had reached the source of all energy". In language reminiscent of his description of the events that first occurred in August–September 1922 he added, "There is only a sense of incredible vastness and immense beauty".[192] In related remarks during a later discussion, he commented on his decades-long effort in trying to point the way to such perception:

And as I have been talking for sixty years, I would like others to reach this - no, not reach it. You understand what I am saying?... Now ... how is one not to teach, not to help, or push - but how is one to say, "This way leads to a complete sense of peace, of love"? I am sorry to use all these words. But suppose you have come to that point and your brain itself is throbbing with it - how would you help another? You understand? Help - not words. How would you help another to come to that?[193]

Also in 1980 longtime Theosophist Radha Burnier, a friend and associate of Krishnamurti, was elected President of the Theosophical Society Adyar.[194] This event set the stage for a "historic" occasion: Krishnamurti's visit to the Theosophical Society headquarters at Adyar in November 1980 - the first such visit in almost half a century - where he encountered a respectful and moving reception. He was to become a frequent visitor at the Society estate during his remaining trips to India.[195]

In 1981 he suffered a bad attack of influenza, becoming "very ill for over a fortnight"; he told associates that he could have easily "slipped away", mentioning that it was "harder for him to stay alive than to die."[196] In the last few years of his life death and dying, subjects he had been addressing through the years, appeared more frequently in his writings, talks, and in his public and private discussions.[197] He again pointed to the importance of understanding psychological time and psychological death - as a way of understanding death in general - during his last talk at Saanen in July 1985:

So, what is death? Is time involved in it?... Time, not only by the watch, by the sunset and sunrise, but also psychologically, inwardly... As long as there is the self-interest, which is the wheel of time, then there must be death... If there is no time, is there death? Are we together? Please this requires - this is real meditation, not all the phoney stuff. Time, psychological time, not the time of the ... clock, the watch on your wrist... Time to succeed, time to grow in that success, and bring about a change in that success. Time means continuity: I have been, I am, I will be. There is this constant continuity in us, which is time.[198]

In 1984 and again in 1985 he spoke to invited audiences at the United Nations in New York City.[199] In late October 1985 he visited India for the last time, holding a number of what came to be known as "farewell" talks and discussions between then and January 1986.[200] These last talks included the fundamental questions he had been asking through the years, as well as newer concerns related to then recent advances in science, technology, and the way they affected humankind. Increasingly, Krishnamurti's physical and intellectual resilience and vigor was showing signs of abating - after lifelong, almost constant travel,[201] and a lifetime of frail physical health.[202] He had commented to friends that he "did not want to invite Death, but he was not sure how long his body would carry on"[200] as he had already lost considerable weight, and had stated on several occasions that once he could no longer talk, he would have no further purpose.[203] In his final talk, on 4 January 1986 in Madras,[204] he again invited the audience to examine with him the nature of inquiry, the effect of technology, the nature of life and meditation, and the nature of creation:

That computer can do almost anything that man can do. It can make all your gods, all your theories, your rituals; it's even better at it than you will ever be. So, the computer is coming up in the world; it's going to make your brains something different. You've heard of genetic engineering; they're trying, whether you like it or not, to change your whole behaviour. That is genetic engineering. They are trying to change your way of thinking. When genetic engineering and the computer meet, what are you? As a human being what are you? Your brains are going to be altered. Your way of behaviour is going to be changed. They may remove fear altogether, remove sorrow, remove all your gods. They're going to; don't fool yourself. It all ends up either in war or in death. This is what is happening in the world actually. Genetic engineering on the one side and the computer on the other, and when they meet, as they're inevitably going to, what are you as a human being? Actually, your brain now is a machine. You are born in India and say: "I'm an Indian". You are encased in that. You are a machine. Please don't be insulted. I'm not insulting you. You are a machine which repeats like a computer. Don't imagine there is something divine in you - that would be lovely - something holy that is everlasting. The computer will say that to you too. So, what is becoming of a human being? What's becoming of you?[205]

and also:

So, we are enquiring into what makes a bird. What is creation behind all this? Are you waiting for me to describe it, go into it? You want me to go into it? Why (From the audience: To understand what creation is). Why do you ask that? Because I asked? No description can ever describe the origin. The origin is nameless; the origin is absolutely quiet, it's not whirring about making noise. Creation is something that is most holy, that's the most sacred thing in life, and if you have made a mess of your life, change it. Change it today, not tomorrow. If you are uncertain, find out why and be certain. If your thinking is not straight, think straight, logically. Unless all that is prepared, all that is settled, you can't enter into this world, into the world of creation.[206]

Krishnamurti was concerned about his legacy, about being unwittingly turned into some personage whose teachings had been handed down to special individuals or groups rather than to the world as a whole. He did not want anyone to pose as an interpreter of the teaching.[207] He warned his associates on several occasions that they were not to present themselves as spokesmen on his behalf, or as his successors after his death.[208] In his last formal meetings with trustees of the Krishnamurti Foundation India in January 1986, the future of the institutions was discussed; their dissolution and liquidation was considered in order to prevent them from becoming, after Krishnamurti's death, authorities (de facto or otherwise) on him and his philosophy. It was decided the institutions would not be dissolved (among other concerns, the legal complexity of such action was noted) however at his request an amendment was inserted in the rules and regulations, in effect reaffirming the Foundations' limited mission - it being solely the preservation and distribution of the teaching as he delivered it.[200][209] During the same meetings "[Krishnamurti] 'had insisted that the houses where he had lived should not become places of pilgrimage, that no cult should grow around him'."[210]

A few days before his death, in a final statement from his sickbed[211] at home in Ojai, he emphatically declared that "nobody" - among his associates or the general public - had understood what had happened to him (as the conduit of the teaching) nor had they understood the teaching itself. He added that the "immense energy" operating in his lifetime would be gone with his death, again implying the impossibility of successors. However he offered hope by stating that people could approach that energy and gain a measure of understanding, "if they live the teachings".[212] In prior discussions he had compared himself with Thomas Edison, meaning by it that he had done the hard work, and now all that was needed by others was a flick of the switch.[213] In another instance he talked of Columbus going through an arduous journey to discover the New World whereas now it could easily be reached by jet; the ultimate implication being that even if Krishnamurti was in some way special,[214] in order to arrive at his level of understanding, others did not need to be.[213]

J. Krishnamurti died at home in Ojai, California on 17 February 1986 at age 90, from pancreatic cancer. His remains were cremated and scattered by friends and former associates in the three countries where he had spent most of his life: India, England, and the United States.[215]

Afterword

Interest in Krishnamurti and his work has persisted in the years since his death.[216] Many of his books as well as audio, video, and computer materials, remain available and are carried by major online and traditional retailers. The official Foundations continue with the maintenance of archives, dissemination of the teachings in an increasing number of languages, new conversions to digital and other media, development of websites, sponsoring of television programs, and with organizing meetings and dialogues of interested persons around the world.[217] According to communications and press releases from the Foundations, their mailing lists, and individuals' inquiries, continue to grow.[218] Similarly, the Foundation-affiliated schools and educational institutions report continuing growth, with new projects added in support of their declared goal of holistic education.[219] In addition, there are unofficial Krishnamurti Committees operating in several countries,[220] as well as independent educational institutions[221] based on his ideas. Biographies, reminiscences, research papers, critical examinations, and book-length studies of Krishnamurti and his philosophy have continued to appear. Cursory (and necessarily incomplete) examination of internet search traffic and group discussion forums indicates that among similar topics, interest in Krishnamurti remains high.[222][223]

During his almost constant presence on the public stage, few details of Krishnamurti's personal life were known; he rarely wrote, or spoke in public about himself, and his friends and associates consistently and actively safeguarded his privacy.[224] The private side of Krishnamurti was eventually addressed by authorized and unauthorized biographies and memoirs of people who knew him, the majority of which treated him sympathetically. However the 1991 publication of the autobiography Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti by Radha Rajagopal Sloss[225] was the cause of adverse publicity and controversy regarding Krishnamurti.[226] The controversy was centered on the author's depiction of his relationship with her parents, primarily (though not exclusively) as it concerned a secret extramarital affair between Krishnamurti and her mother Rosalind Rajagopal that had lasted many years.[227] In addition, the book contains a number of allegations, and presents an assessment of Krishnamurti's personality and life that often differs sharply from that offered by other biographers. The allegations and other statements regarding Krishnamurti and the ambivalent, often negative portrayal of his by Sloss, provoked rebuttal publications such as a "personal response" by Mary Lutyens.[228] Others, such as Helen Nearing, who had known Krishnamurti in his youth, questioned whether his attitudes were conditioned by privilege, as he was supported - and in Nearing's opinion often pampered - by devoted followers starting as far back as his "discovery" by the Theosophists.[229]

Biographers and associates of Krishnamurti acknowledge another complaint against him, one that relates to his demeanor during talks and discussions: that Krishnamurti often comes across as too vague or too assertive, or both. David Skitt, who edited several Krishnamurti books, attempts to deal with this issue in the "Editor's Introduction" of the book To Be Human.[230] He discusses another point that Krishnamurti often made, one that Skitt admits could at first glance be thought of as "condescending" or "arrogant": that before considering any of the questions Krishnamurti was concerned with, there was a need to understand "the nature of a mind capable of going into" such questions.[231] Krishnamurti often linked this issue with another recurrent theme, his contention that the human brain is deeply conditioned by evolution, experience, tradition, and culture.[232] Skitt also cautions (echoing Krishnamurti himself) that clarity requires going past any perceived "striking" or "original" qualities in Krishnamurti's statements and into the rigorous examination and understanding of the statements' implications.[233] He places the above, and similar, utterances by Krishnamurti in the context of recurring statements that Krishnamurti made in talks and dialogues: The proclamation (usually in the beginning of each talk) that his message should not be taken at face value, but that it should be shared critically, and be appraised by each listener; and also, the accompanying additional proclamation that he did not consider himself an authority of any kind.

What is important is to listen to what he has to say, share it, not only listen, but actually participate in what he's saying. You may agree, or disagree, which you are perfectly right to do, but since you are here and since the speaker is here, we are talking over together... Don't just listen to me ... but share in it, tear it to pieces. Don't, please accept anything he says. He's not your guru, thank god. He is not your leader. He is not your helper.[234]

The fact that Krishnamurti was - and conceivably, after his death may continue to be - looked upon as a world teacher or guru despite his aversion or denials, has been considered ironic by associates, detractors and biographers.[235] In the opinion of some observers there has been a tendency among Krishnamurti adherents to put him on a pedestal, to otherwise focus excessively on the person, or to examine his work and life in a selective manner; according to one view, this attitude has on occasion also been found among, or tolerated by, the official Krishnamurti-related entities.[236] In a different direction, people who knew Krishnamurti in his youth found his eventual transformation difficult to fathom. As Mary Lutyens professed a few years before his death, "I find hard to reconcile the shy gentleness and almost vacant mind of the sixteen-year-old-boy ... with the powerful teacher who has evolved a philosophy that cannot be shaken by the most prominent thinkers of the day - particularly hard since there is so much of that boy remaining in the man."[237] Such observations may then lead to the question of the source of Krishnamurti's inspiration and of any originality in his work, "the mystery that he preferred not to clarify for fear it might be leapt on in judgement or cheapened by the spiritually ambitious."[238]

The perceived originality of Krishnamurti's message has been a subject of discussion by a wide variety of commentators. His teaching has been compared to diverse traditions and disciplines, of both the East and the West, and its uniqueness has been questioned.[239] Krishnamurti sometimes fielded such questions from his audience. During a talk in 1956, when asked, "Is there anything new in your teaching?" he replied:

To find out for yourself is much more important than my asserting yes or no. It is your problem, not my problem. To me, all this is totally new because it has to be discovered from moment to moment; it cannot be stored up after discovery; it is not something to be experienced and then retained as memory - which would be putting new wine in old bottles. It must be discovered as one lives from day to day, and it is new to the person who so discovers it. But you are always comparing what is being said with what has been said by some saint, or by Shankara, Buddha, or Christ. You say, "All these people have said this before, and you are only giving it another twist, a modern expression" - so naturally it is nothing new to you. It is only when you have ceased to compare, when you have put away Shankara, Buddha, Christ, with all their knowledge, information, so that your mind is alone, clear, no longer influenced, controlled, compelled, either by modern psychology or by the ancient sanctions and edicts - it is only then that you will find out whether or not there is something new, everlasting. But that requires vigor, not indolence; it demands a drastic cutting away of all the things that one has read or been told about truth and God. That which is eternal, new, is a living thing; therefore, it cannot be made permanent, and a mind that wants to make it permanent will never find it.[240]

Because of his ideas and his era, Krishnamurti has come to be seen as an exemplar of those spiritual teachers who disavow formal rituals and dogma. His conception of Truth as a pathless land, with the possibility of immediate liberation,[241] has been mirrored, or has been claimed as an influence, in the work of diverse movements and personalities.[242] However his very emphasis on the uselessness - if not detriment - of outside help and guidance gave rise to complaints, as such emphasis was sometimes perceived as lack of compassion.[243] Others have cautioned against approaching Krishnamurti's message in the hope of finding psychological support, emotional indulgence, or any ready-made solutions: "[Krishnamurti's] uncompromising refusal to offer comfort is one of the things that distinguishes him ... He refuses to be our guru; he will not tell us what to do; he merely holds up a mirror to us and points out the causes of ... all the ... miseries that affect mankind, and says: 'Take it or leave it.' ... Our problems can be solved by no one but ourselves."[244]

Krishnamurti's own indication of success remained the same throughout: whether individuals had truly understood, and therefore "lived and breathed", the teaching.[245] Such understanding requires "hard, arduous work" and the highest level of personal commitment; yet also a "meditation which is absolutely no effort" and the realization that asking fundamental questions, especially when such questions are properly formulated, may be more important than seeking the answers.[246] Another prerequisite for understanding is a seriousness that in his view, is not necessarily devoid of fun.[247] He had remarked in 1929, at the Dissolution of the Order of the Star, that he was not interested in numbers, stating: "If there are only five people who will listen, who will live, who have their faces turned towards eternity, it will be sufficient."[84] In his later years he was sometimes asked why he kept on teaching, what motivated him after all these decades, as by his own admission, so few, if any, had changed.[248] He answered one such question in 1980:

I think when one sees something true and beautiful, one wants to tell people about it, out of affection, out of compassion, out of love... Can you ask the flower why it grows, why it has perfume? It is for the same reason the speaker talks.[249]

Works

See also

Notes and abbreviations

Abbreviations

Notes

  1. ^ Jiddu (alternately spelled Jeddu, Geddu or Giddu) was Krishnamurti's family name. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 308. [In "Notes and Sources": (note to) page 1]. Mary Lutyens was an authorized biographer and lifelong friend of Krishnamurti. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. ix [in "Foreword"].
  2. ^ According to a caretaker of their ancestral house, Krishnamurti’s family were Velanadu Brahmins. Williams 2004 p. 466. [In "Notes": no. 13]. C. V. Williams, who interviewed the caretaker during a visit to the house, adds that "Velanadu are popularly regarded as high-class Brahmins". See also Jayakar 1986 p. 15. Pupul Jayakar (née Mehta), was another authorized biographer and longtime confidante of Krishnamurti. Jayakar 1986 p. xi [in "Preface"].
  3. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 5.
  4. ^ See Williams 2004 pp. 471-472. [In "Notes": no. 50]. C. V. Williams points to discrepancies among various sources regarding the size and composition of the Jiddu household. The information provided here reflects a 1993 legal statement by Giddu Narayan, Krishnamurti's nephew.
  5. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 Discus, pp. 1-2. M. Lutyens considers such practices common among pious high-caste Hindus at that time.
  6. ^ 11 May according to the Hindu calendar. Krishnamurti was born sometime past midnight (local time) of 12 May, but prior to dawn, which denotes the start of the Hindu calendar day. M. Lutyens states that according to Hindu reckoning, the day lasts from 4 am to 4 am. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 1-2. M. Lutyens provided added details and sources in M. Lutyens 1995, in whose preface she corrects "an unaccountable mistake" she made regarding the location of his mother's delivery. [The mistake appears in M. Lutyens 1975 (all editions) and other books. As of 2010].
  7. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 Discus, p. 1. Krishnamurti means "in the image (or form) of Krishna". Krishna was according to legend his mother's eighth child.
  8. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 2-3, 4.
  9. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 Discus, pp. 3, 4, 22, 25.
  10. ^ [Omitted text from quotes throughout article removed for topicality, brevity, and consistency only. Whenever possible weblinks (in relevant notes or references) are provided to the full text. As of 15 December 2010].
  11. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1982 p. 11. Entry of 15 September 1973. (Context-based weblink: para. 13 retrieved 2010-06-24). In most of his writings, Krishnamurti refers to himself in the third person. In his later public talks and discussions he consistently referred to himself as the speaker, or as K.
  12. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 Discus, p. 5. Quoting from Krishnamurti's memoirs, held [c. 1975] at AA: "I may mention that I frequently saw her [his mother] after she died". He was highly affected by the death of his mother, whom he describes as being like himself "to a certain extent psychic". In 1913 Krishnamurti had started writing a never completed memoir entitled Fifty Years Of My Life. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 309. [In "Notes and Sources": (note to) page 5. Archived Krishnamurti materials may be either originals or copies; the same item may exist in multiple Archives].
  13. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1982 p. 16. Entry of 17 September 1973. (Context-based weblink: para. 30 retrieved 2010-06-24).
  14. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 Discus, pp. 3-4.
  15. ^ Britannica 2010.
  16. ^ The Theosophical Society, the "charismatic" personalities of its leaders, and Theosophy itself had generated considerable worldwide interest among the cultural, business, and social elites of the late 19th and early 20th century. Heralded - or opposed - as the harbingers of a "new age", they attracted, at least temporarily, a number of wealthy patrons and eloquent, well-known supporters, of whom several eventually met young Krishnamurti. Campbell 1980 "Chapter 1: The Birth of the Theosophical Society" pp. 1-29; "Chapter 4: Formative Years: Achievement, Controversy, Schism" pp. 75-111; "Chapter 5: The Twentieth Century: Three Paths for Theosophy" pp. 113-145; and pp. 165-173.
  17. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 Discus, p. 7. "Theosophy embraced all religions". C. V. Williams states that at the time, "it would seem that there was no conflict between the values of the Theosophical Society and those of Hinduism" as far as Krishnamurti’s parents were concerned. Williams 2004 p. 4.
  18. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 Discus, p. 8.
  19. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 41. M. Lutyens 1995.
  20. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 20-21. The exact date is uncertain; M. Lutyens thinks it happened sometime after 22 April.
  21. ^ Melton 2001.
  22. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 21. Quoting Leadbeater's description to assistant Ernest Wood. According to occult and Theosophical lore auras are invisible emanations related to each individual's "subtler" planes of existence, as well as her or his "normal" plane. The ability to discern a person's aura is considered one of the possible effects of clairvoyance. Leadbeater's occult knowledge and abilities were highly respected within the Society and its leadership. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 15.
  23. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 21. Wood 1964. Eyewitness account of Krishnamurti's "discovery" and comments on related events and controversies. By Leadbeater associate Ernest Wood. Leadbeater's further occult investigations strengthened his opinion of Krishnamurti as the likely "vehicle". M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 22-24. Leadbeater is presented as a complicated and controversial character who remained a mystery even to those close to him. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. x-xi [in "Foreword"]. The World Teacher is described as a messianic figure corresponding to, and combining aspects of, Christ, the Buddhist Maitreya, and the Hindu Avatar, among others. A founder of the Theosophical Society, Helena Blavatsky, had divulged to select associates before her death that the ultimate purpose of the Society was to prepare the way for this arrival, which Besant and Leadbeater considered imminent. Blavatsky 1889 pp. 304-307. Hodson 1929. Schuller 1997.
  24. ^ Jayakar questioned the account of the boy Krishnamurti's physical appearance. In her view, the cultural background of the European Theosophists had likely influenced their impressions. Jayakar 1986 pp. 26-28. She considered young Krishnamurti beautiful, basing her opinion on contemporary photographs. Jayakar 1986 p. 34.
  25. ^ Jayakar 1986 p. 28. Krishnamurti in private conversations during his later years would refer to this "vacancy" often, considering it fundamental to his later development. M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, "Chapter 17: The vacant mind" pp. 159-168. M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, pp. 3, 31. Apparently Leadbeater thought so too, although for different reasons. Vernon 2001 p. 83. Quotes Leadbeater's opinion that Krishnamurti's "vacant nature" was "the very quality that made him so ideal a candidate for Vehicleship".
  26. ^ [Except for the Introduction, and following common practice in the relevant cited sources, quotation marks or emphasis added throughout the article to signifying titles, names, events, and other terms: "discovery", "vacancy", World Teacher, Order of the Star, the Masters, the process, the otherness, etc. Emphasis or quotation marks also added to Krishnamurti's philosophical subjects and terms. The source of all other emphasis indicated in notes unless obvious (or per Manual of Style). All other terms enclosed in quotation marks appear in cited sources immediately following, or as indicated. Elements such as nested quotation marks, capitalization, punctuation, etc. as in original sources. As of 15 December 2010].
  27. ^ The suffix -ji in Hindu names is a sign of affection or respect. Jayakar 1986 p. xi [in "Preface"].
  28. ^ Vernon 2001 "Chapter 4: At the Feet of the Master" pp. 51-72.
  29. ^ M. Lutyens 1995.
  30. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 47. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 31, 62. Krishnamurti letters to Besant of 24 December 1909 and 5 January 1913 respectively, held [c. 1975] at AA. (M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 308 [General Sources in "Notes and Sources"]).
  31. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 40. In Jayakar's description, Besant had "prevailed" on Narianiah to "hand over" guardianship to her. Jayakar 1986 p. 29.
  32. ^ a b Jayakar 1986 "Chapter 3: The Dream: 'Is That You My Lord?'" pp. 30-44.
  33. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, "Chapter 7: Legal Guardianship" pp. 54-63; "Chapter 8: The Lawsuit" pp. 64-71; pp. 82, 84. Privy Council 1914. Court decision. "Advise ... the suit dismissed with costs both here and in the Courts below."
  34. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 3, 32. "Nitya was as sharp as K was vague and dreamy; nevertheless there was a very close bond between these brothers." [p. 3].
  35. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 46. The organization's name was later shortened to Order of the Star. See also the Six Principles for a list of the Principles of the Order.
  36. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 56, 59; "Chapter 5: First Teaching" through "Chapter 7: Legal Guardianship" pp. 40-63 [cumulative]. The news regarding Krishnamurti and the World Teacher were not universally welcome by Theosophists, and lead to upheavals and splits in the Society. Tillet 1986 "Chapter 15: Conflict Over Krishnamurti" pp. 506-553 includes information on objections by Theosophists as well as on other related controversies. Part of the controversy was Leadbeater's role. He had a history of being in the company of young boys - as pupils under his spiritual and Theosophical instruction - and there was gossip concerning abuses. The majority of his charges, when asked, "vouched" for his "purity"; yet there had been scandals within the Theosophical Society over past accusations from boys in his care regarding improper sexual behavior. This was vehemently denied by Annie Besant and no accusations were ever proven, but the gossip greatly disturbed Krishnamurti's father. M. Lutyens 1975 Discus, pp. 15-19, 40, 56. News article: Manchester Guardian 1913. Pseudonymous column on religious and spiritual matters comments on the contemporary controversies surrounding Krishnamurti and Annie Besant.
  37. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 93, 308 [General Sources in "Notes and Sources"]. Letter by Krishnamurti to Annie Besant of 7 October 1915 held [c. 1975] at AA. "There is my work laid out for me by the Masters and yourself. I honestly mean to do this and I will do this at all costs." [Emphasis in original]. According to Theosophical doctrine, the "Masters" were the ultimate guides of the Society, members of its reputed "hidden Spiritual Hierarchy". M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 10-11. E. Lutyens 1957 Hart-Davis, p. 71 writes that [young Krishnamurti] "accepted his position [as the likely "vehicle" of the World Teacher] but never derived any personal satisfaction from it."
  38. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 57.
  39. ^ Leadbeater had been for some time the leading investigator and instructor within the Society of the so-called Esoteric aspects of Theosophy. Under his "sponsorship", Krishnamurti successfully completed his first spiritual initiation and was "accepted" as a pupil by the Society's "hidden Spiritual Hierarchy". Krishnamurti described the events - which reputedly happened (per his and others' accounts) mostly in an occult, or mystical, dimension - in a letter to Annie Besant, dated 12 January 1910, held [c. 1975] at AA. Nitya had reputedly also been "accepted" as a pupil, thanks to his devotion and importance to Krishnamurti and his "mission". M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 35-38, 308 [General Sources in "Notes and Sources"]; also "Chapter 4: First Initiation" and "Chapter 5: First Teaching", pp. 29-46 [cumulative]. The "Masters' " spiritual instruction of Krishnamurti resulted in a short book, ostensibly written by him under a pseudonym assigned by Leadbeater. The book, originally published in 1910 (Alcyone 1910) became popular among such works, and is considered a theosophical classic. M. Lutyens 1975 p. 28. However, the identity of the author has been the subject of debate. M. Lutyens 1975 pp. 43-44, Williams 2004 pp. 24-29. Wood 1964 has related information.
  40. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 SP, pp. 83, 120, 149. Krishnamurti was not well read. Decades later (M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 192) M. Lutyens stated that he "has read very little (and that little forgotten)". In later years his admitted lack of erudition surprized people impressed by what they considered as the depth and originality of his ideas. Landau 1943 pp. 268-270. By the early 1930s he was avoiding philosophical and theoretical works of either secular or sacred nature wilfully and on principle; for the rest of his life, other than newspapers and magazines, he was reading mainly detective fiction and thrillers. M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 86. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 35.
  41. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, pp. 4, 20.
  42. ^ a b Vernon 2001 p. 53. In addition to the extraordinary circumstances surrounding him, young Krishnamurti's good looks, fashionable attire and personal grooming habits (M. Lutyens 1975 pp. 94-95, 107), as well as his love of fast cars (Sloss 1993 pp. 68, 150), golf and tennis (M. Lutyens 1975 pp. 85-86, 106, 119), were often commented on the contemporary press. (Wales 1926. "[T]he handsome young Oxfordian, dressed like the Prince of Wales ..." [In describing Krishnamurti as an "Oxfordian", the article contradicts the public record, widely accepted sources, and Krishnamurti himself. Despite his efforts, Krishnamurti was never accepted by the University of Oxford. M. Lutyens 1975 pp. 99-100. The then Prince of Wales, Edward Windsor VIII, was known as a dandy]).
  43. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 52.
  44. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, "Chapter 10: Doubts and Difficulties" through "Chapter 15: In Love" pp. 80-132 [cumulative] deal extensively with these issues. Vernon 2001 offers a concise summation in "Chapter 5: Moulding a Messiah" pp. 73-93 and "Chapter 6: Cracking the Mould" pp. 94-115.
  45. ^ Emily Lutyens (née Lady Lytton, 1874-1964) was an active member of the Theosophical Society. Her intimate relationship with Krishnamurti was at times frowned upon by the highest ranking members of the Society as well as by her frustrated and skeptical husband, noted architect Edwin Lutyens. Vernon 2001 pp. 67, 80-83. See also Ridley 2003, and Emily Lutyens' 1957 autobiography, Candles in the Sun (E. Lutyens 1957).
  46. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 51-52.
  47. ^ Krishnamurti was named Editor of the Herald of the Star, the official bulletin of the OSE. His position was mainly as a figurehead, yet he often wrote editorial notes, which along with his other contributions helped the magazine's circulation. M. Lutyens 1975 KFT, pp. 46, 74-75, 126.
  48. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 65.
  49. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 75, 77. Mary Dodge, a heiress to the Dodge copper fortune, and prominent in Theosophical circles, bestowed Krishnamurti 500 pounds sterling per year for life in October 1913. This was the only personal income of his not directly provided by the Theosophical Society or the OSE, and according to M. Lutyens it may have given him "an added self-confidence, a sense of independence."
  50. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 125.
  51. ^ These writings consisted of editorials, inspirational short stories, parables, instructional tracts or booklets, and poetry. See Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography: Pre-1933.
  52. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 134, 135, 171-172.
  53. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 127, 259.
  54. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 131-132, 258, 308 [General Sources in "Notes and Sources"]. On 17 November 1921, Krishnamurti wrote to E. Lutyens expressing his frustration. "I am awfully in love [with Helen Knothe] & it is a great sacrifice on my part but nothing else can be done." Emphasis in original. Letter in possession [c. 1975] of M. Lutyens. He had previously stated that his mission was such that he would never marry [p. 118] and "at that time ... believed, with the majority of Theosophists, that sex was something unclean that must be sublimated" [p. 114], an obstacle to spiritual progress. Vernon 2001 p. 95 writes that Krishnamurti was "commited by his elders to a celibate life." Krishnamurti did not engage in a sexual relationship until 1932, by which time his outlook on sex and life had changed considerably. In old age, he had apparently forgotten ever falling in love. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 18.
  55. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 97. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 149, 199, 209, 216-217.
  56. ^ Rosalind Williams, sister of a local Theosophist, had been asked to act as companion and nurse to the ailing Nitya. Sloss 1993 pp. 54-55. Also M. Lutyens 1991 p. 35.
  57. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 113.
  58. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 6.
  59. ^ Jayakar 1986 pp. 46-57. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, "Chapter 18: The Turning Point" through "Chapter 21: Climax of the Process" pp. 152-188 [cumulative].
  60. ^ The events of August–September 1922, and the continuing occurrences of the process were publicly revealed only when the first volume of M. Lutyens' biography, Krishnamurti: The Years of Awakening, was published in 1975. (M. Lutyens 1975). Details and first hand descriptions of the process were published 1976, in Krishnamurti's Notebook - a journal that Krishnamurti kept between June 1961 and March 1962. (J. Krishnamurti 2003). M. Lutyens, while responding to certain allegations regarding the process made several decades later, briefly provided updated information in her Krishnamurti and the Rajagopals, published 1996. (M. Lutyens 1996).
  61. ^ Krishnamurti and others with him at the time provided written accounts of the August–September 1922 incidents. These include accounts by Nitya and two prominent Theosophists. Rosalind Williams, who was also present, apparently did not provide any written account of the events. Documents held [c. 2001] at OA (Vernon 2001 p. 282 [in "Notes": nos. 2, 3]). Other relevant material held [c. 2001] at AA (Vernon 2001 p. 282 [in "Notes": no. 7]).
  62. ^ "There was a man mending the road; that man was myself; the pickaxe he held was myself; the very stone which he was breaking up was a part of me; the tender blade of the grass was my very being, and the tree beside the man was myself... I was in everything, or rather everything was in me, inanimate and animate, the mountain, the worm, and all breathing things. All day long I remained in this happy condition." M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 158. From Krishnamurti's written account.
  63. ^ According to Nitya's account, himself and Rosalind Williams had ecstatic experiences of their own, while the other two people present were also affected. (According to their own accounts, and Nitya's). Vernon 2001 pp. 118-119.
  64. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 159-160. From Krishnamurti's written account. M. Lutyens devotes "Chapter 18: The Turning Point" pp. 152-164 in this book to the initial three-day experience.
  65. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 165 and p. 308 [General Sources in "Notes and Sources"]. From a Krishnamurti letter dated 17 September 1922 to Emily Lutyens: "Ever since I had that memorable experience [of 17–20 August] I have not been 'well'." Original [c. 1975] in possession of M. Lutyens.
  66. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, "Chapter 19: The Process Begins" pp. 165-171. Also "Chapter 18: The Turning Point" pp. 152-164; "Chapter 20: The Process Intensified" pp. 172-179; "Chapter 21: Climax of the Process" pp. 180-188. The use of the term "going off" in the accounts of the early occurrences of the process apparently signified so-called out-of-body experiences; in later usage its meaning was apparently more nuanced. M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, pp. 134-135. Description of incident in the early 1970s, recorded in an associate's diary.
  67. ^ J. Krishnamurti 2003 p. 2. "In the evening it was there: suddenly it was there, filling the room, a great sense of beauty, power and gentleness. Others noticed it." (From the entry of 18 June 1961). In same, see also M. Lutyens (1976). "Foreword to the Original Edition" pp. v-vii. The process is described as mainly a physical condition. The otherness is described as mainly occupying the realm of consciousness. Other sources: M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 226-227, 228, 230. M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, pp. 8, 31, 62, 100, 137. Krishnamurti (and others who occasionally experienced it in his company) made clear that any attempt at personification of the otherness would be totally inconsistent with the actual experience. He also commented on the increasing, with time, intensity and frequency of his experiencing it. In his later writings and discussions he would refer to the otherness more often, sometimes explicitly or - arguably, and usually - as implied by his narrative.
  68. ^ The one most frequently put forth is the view that it represented the so-called awakening of kundalini, a process that according to Hindu mysticism culminates in transcendent consciousness (see Jayakar 1986 p. 46n and M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 166). Others view it in Freudian terms. A theory expounded in the Harvard Theological Review (Aberbach 1993) contends that the experiences were basically a projection of Krishnamurti's accumulated grief over the death of his mother. Still others have viewed it as a purely physical event centered on sickness or trauma. Krishnamurti believed the process was necessary for his spiritual development and not a medical matter or condition. (M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, pp. 45-46). Per his written account, and as far as he was concerned, he had encountered Truth.
  69. ^ The original Theosophical explanation was that Krishnamurti was in the process of successfully completing a spiritual Initiation (M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 163-164), that may have involved the opening of his so-called third eye (M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 186). However, this view lost traction as the process continued unabated. Leadbeater eventually asked Mary Rocke, a trusted Star member and longtime Theosophist who was also a medical doctor, to form a professional opinion of the process. She witnessed an occurrence of it over the course of nearly two weeks during April 1924, and examined Krishnamurti, but was apparently unable to provide a diagnosis or other explanation. According to Krishnamurti, she accepted the events as genuine and not as the result of hysteria or suggestion; however there is no other known record of Rocke's opinion. She was the only medical professional to ever witness the process (M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 188). M. Lutyens writes that "if any strange doctor or psychologist had entered the house [someone not known or not trusted by Krishnamurti] 'the process' would undoubtebly have stopped." (M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 45). Williams 2004 pp. 126-128, 129, and 501 [in "Notes": nos. 45, 47, 48, 51] has related information, including Leadbeater's letter of 1 January 1924 regarding the process and Nitya's correspondence regarding same. [Letters held (c. 2004) at VVA].
  70. ^ For example see Jayakar 1986 p. 133. Krishnamurti often spoke about a sensation of "enormous energy" while the process was going on, and in this discussion from the late 1970s he wondered whether the pain accompanying the process was the result of procedures to "polish" his body so it could accommodate this energy. See also M. Lutyens 1988 JM, pp. 39-40. An obstacle to clarity was Krishnamurti's almost total lack of recollection of the events in later years. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 71.
  71. ^ Vernon 2001 pp. 131-132. M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, pp. 6-8 describes Krishnamurti's "new stature and authority". M. Lutyens also offers that because of these experiences, "he became less vague and more beautiful." Krishnamurti throughout his Notebook, strongly suggests that these experiences, continuing unabated at the time of its writing in the early 1960s, served as facilitators of, and conduits to, the teaching and its public exposition. J. Krishnamurti 2003.
  72. ^ In the meantime the rumors concerning the messianic status of Krishnamurti had reached fever pitch as a visit to Sydney was planned. Leadbeater had been based there since 1914, and the Theosophical Society had then owned a local radio station. The Star Amphitheatre was built in 1923–24 at Balmoral Beach on Sydney Harbour as a platform for the coming World Teacher. According to sensational media reportage, Krishnamurti was to make a triumphant arrival, walking on water through Sydney Heads. Paralleling this increasing adulation was Krishnamurti's growing discomfort with it. Gosling 2006 p. 15. Kohn 2001. At the same time, prominent Theosophists and their factions within the Society were trying to favorably position themselves relative to the approaching "Coming" and the new "Messiah"; "extraordinary" (and disputed) pronouncements were made by various parties, and the internal Theosophical politics further alienated Krishnamurti. M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, pp. 57-60.
  73. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 219, 300 [in "Chronology"].
  74. ^ M. Lutyens writes of Krishnamurti's conviction that "Nitya was essential for K's life-mission and therefore he would not be allowed to die" (M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 219) a belief shared by Annie Besant and Krishnamurti's circle (p. 221). Elsewhere M. Lutyens mentions the Theosophists' "assurances" about Nitya's importance to the "mission". (M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 57). Krishnamurti wrote that he had personally received similar assurances from high-ranking members of the Society's hidden Spiritual Hierarchy. (Vernon 2001 pp. 147, 284 [in "Notes": no. 9]. Letter from Krishnamurti to Nitya of 4 February 1925 held [c. 2001] at AA). Nitya's death shocked M. Lutyens and Rosalind Williams, who were both in love with him. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 116, 196, 221. Sloss 1993 pp. 55-56, 118.
  75. ^ a b c Jayakar 1986 p. 69.
  76. ^ a b Vernon 2001 p. 152.
  77. ^ a b M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 220, 313 [in "Notes and Sources": (note to) page 220]. Eyewitness report by B. Shiva Rao, a longtime close friend of Krishnamurti. Also in Jayakar 1986 pp. 69, 505 [in "Notes": no. 8].
  78. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 221.
  79. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1926.
  80. ^ M. Lutyens quotes Krishnamurti as stating, during a discussion in 1979, that "from 1922 (the year of his experience at Ojai) he had found his own language". M. Lutyens 1983 JM, p. 234.
  81. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 259-262; "Chapter 27: The Kingdom of Happiness" pp. 227-235; "Chapter 29: Liberation" pp. 242-248; "Chapter 30: Revolutionary Pronouncements" pp. 249-253. Jayakar 1986 pp. 70-74. Vernon 2001 pp. 171-180.
  82. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 272. The 1929 Star Camp commenced on 2 August; Krishnamurti delivered the so-called Dissolution Speech the next morning. See J. Krishnamurti 1929 for the complete speech, and also D. Rajagopal 1929. [Both originally published in the International Star Bulletin, a successor of the Herald of the Star]. The Order held annual Star Camps for its members on the grounds of Castle Eerde (Ommen) between 1924 and 1929. The estate had been gifted to a trust affiliated with the Order. Vernon 2001 p. 102.
  83. ^ ISB 1929. Number of members present as reported by the Order's International Star Bulletin. Speech broadcast by Dutch radio. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 272.
  84. ^ a b c d e J. Krishnamurti 1929.
  85. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 JM, p. 81. M. Lutyens 1975 SP, pp. 277-278. Letters by Krishnamurti to E. Lutyens (December 1929) and A. Besant (February 1930). Reaction of leading Theosophists on pp. 278-279, 315 [in "Notes and Sources": (notes to) pp. 278-279] of same.
  86. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 278. Select news reports: Manchester Guardian 1929. New York Times 1929. Related comments at Wood 1964.
  87. ^ While Krishnamurti did not deny being the World Teacher, he "baffled" his followers by declaring that such status could be "achieved by ... everyone". Vernon 2001 pp. 166-167. Several decades later, in discussions with close associates Krishnamurti described the World Teacher or Maitreya association as "too concrete" to be an explanation of his life-story, and "not subtle enough." M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 234. M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, pp. 92-93. Jayakar 1986 pp. 439-440.
  88. ^ "I think we shall have incessant wrangles over the corpse of Krishnamurti if we discuss this or that, wondering who is now speaking. Someone asked me: 'Do tell me if it is you speaking or someone else'. I said: 'I really do not know and it does not matter'." J. Krishnamurti 1972 p. 9. From the 1927 "Question and Answer Session" at Ommen. [Note weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti website].
  89. ^ "I am going to be purposely vague, because although I could quite easily make it definite, it is not my intention to do so. Because once you define a thing it becomes dead." Krishnamurti on the World Teacher. From "Who brings the truth", an address delivered at Ommen 2 August 1927. J. Krishnamurti 1928 p. 43. [Note weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti website. Link-specific content verified against original. New York Public Library Main Branch. Record No: b14583087 retrieved 2010-12-15].
  90. ^ [As noted previously]. In the 1928 Ommen "Question and Answer Session" he again reiterated and expanded on these themes. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 262, 315 [in "Notes and Sources": (note to) p. 262].
  91. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 189. Besant at some point had offered to resign as President of the Theosophical Society, feeling unable to reconcile its growing differences with Krishnamurti. (M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 236). Emily Lutyens had written in the International Star Bulletin that Krishnamurti left his followers "naked and alone, their foundations shattered". (E. Lutyens 1928 p. 15). She was also desolate over the ending of the Order and its World Teacher Project, and unable to comprehend or follow Krishnamurti’s new direction. (M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 279). C. V. Williams, citing Emily Lutyens letters to Krishnamurti of 14 August and 16 September 1934 held [c. 2005] at VVA, writes of her (Emily Lutyens') complaint that "he might not deny being a world teacher but he constantly denied being the 'World Teacher' for whom Theosophists had given money" [emphasis in original]. (Williams 2004 pp. 212, 517 [in "Notes": no. 3]). C. V. Williams describes these letters by Emily Lutyens, which were prompted by pleas from Krishnamurti’s associates for donations, as "rather stiff". She provides part of Krishnamurti’s response of 27 August 1934, also found in M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 30: "You know mum I have never denied it [being the World Teacher]. I have only said it does not matter who or what I am but that they should examine what I say, which does not mean that I have denied being the W.T." [Emphasis in original].
  92. ^ M. Lutyens considers the last remaining tie with Theosophy to have been severed in 1933, with the death of Besant. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 285 [in "Postscript"]. He had resigned from the Society in 1930. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 276.
  93. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1975 p. 21. (Context-based weblink: para. 36 retrieved 2010-04-30). Similar remarks can be found in practically every talk he gave after the dissolution of the Order.
  94. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1975 p. 19. (Context-based weblink: para. 31 retrieved 2010-04-30).
  95. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1968 para. 57. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
  96. ^ Castle Eerde (Ommen), previously owned by the van Pallandt family. After the dissolution of the Order Krishnamurti continued to hold meetings and camps at the estate until the outbreak of World War II, mainly at a 400-acre parcel that housed the original campground, and which was returned after the war. The bulk of the estate had been transferred back to the van Pallandt family in 1931. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 276. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 96.
  97. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 276; "Chapter 34: The Full Flower" pp. 276-284. Jayakar 1986 pp. 79-85. News report: New York Herald European Edition 1931. "Krishnamurti, Youthful Hindu Held by Theosophists as 'Savior,' Hands Back All Tributes" [article subheading].
  98. ^ Foundations 1997. Includes a Krishnamurti chronology and the complete listing of every place that he spoke at from 1923 to 1986.
  99. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1965 para. 24. Retrieved 2010-05-20. Also in J. Krishnamurti 1992 p. 245. Krishnamurti made similar remarks in many of his talks and discussions.
  100. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1975 p. 20. (Context-based weblink: para. 33 retrieved 2010-04-30).
  101. ^ Born in India and of Brahmin descent, D. Rajagopal (1900-1993) had been at age thirteen another of Leadbeater's occult "discoveries" (M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 83) and had moved in Krishnamurti's circle since early youth. Regarded as an excellent editor and organizer, he was also known for his difficult personality and high-handed manner. Being practical-minded and methodical, he was temperamentally the opposite of Krishnamurti. Upon Nitya's death, he had promised Annie Besant that he would look after Krishnamurti, and replaced Nitya in his role as Krishnamurti's frequent travel companion and aide, and also as official of the OSE. The SPT had been established several years prior; originally based in Ommen, it was reorganized and relocated to Los Angeles following the dissolution of the Order of the Star. Methorst 2003 "Chapter 12".
  102. ^ The Rajagopals resided in the house known as Arya Vihara (according to M. Lutyens Noble Monastery in Sanskrit) which was part of a later addition to the property. M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 7. M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 71. Krishnamurti occupied the nearby Pine Cottage, the original residence. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 16, 29. In general, similar arrangements continued until the late 1960s-early 1970s.
  103. ^ Vernon 2001 pp. 199, 184. Sloss 1993 p. 128. "[Krishnamurti] had no cash and no bank account ... had no concept of money. A thousand dollars meant no more than twenty."
  104. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 17. Vernon 2001 pp. 199-200, comments on the business side of the SPT, reporting that by then it had become the principal source of funding for Krishnamurti, his associates, and his work, in addition to other income from donations and endowments. He describes D. Rajagopal's commercial accumen and rigorous work routine, and contrasts it with Krishnamurti's outlook, writing that their personality differences frequently led to "confrontations", and offering that after the relocation to Ojai, their "relationship teetered ... between strong affection and mutual antipathy".
  105. ^ Sloss 1993 pp. 111-112.
  106. ^ Radha's autobiographical account, Lives in the Shadow With J. Krishnamurti, which publicly revealed the extramarital relationship between her mother and Krishnamurti, was first published 1991 in the UK by Bloomsbury Publishing. Sloss puts the start of the affair in early-to-mid 1932, whereupon Krishnamurti "experienced his first sexual relationship"; in her opinion, he had "possibly" been in love with Rosalind long before that. (Sloss 1993 p. 117). The work additionally contains a number of allegations and controversial statements, including the author's opinions that Krishnamurti's process may have been the result of epilepsy (Sloss 1993 p. 61), or at other times probably a "performance" to attract female attention (Sloss 1993 pp. 308, 316). Rebuttal publications by Krishnamurti associates (M. Lutyens 1996) and related institutions (KFA 1995) soon followed. M. Lutyens offers specific rebuttals to Sloss' opinions of the process indicated above, and other related statements, in M. Lutyens 1996 "Chapter 32".
  107. ^ The two also shared an interest in education: Krishnamurti helped to raise Radha, and the need to provide her with a suitable educational environment was one of the reasons that led to the founding of the Happy Valley School in 1946. Sloss 1993 "Chapter 19: A School is Born" pp. 201-211. [p. 205 for the concerns about Radha's schooling].
  108. ^ The Rishi Valley School was built on land purchased in the mid-to-late 1920s. However it started operations after the dissolution of the Order of the Star. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 199n, 267.
  109. ^ As of March 2010. List of the Krishnamurti Foundation-affiliated schools: J.Krishnamurti Online (n/d).
  110. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 87. Vernon 2001 pp. 237-238. When asked by an associate, Krishnamurti enumerated the following as his educational aims: 1. Global outlook - A vision of the whole as distinct from the part; there should never be a sectarian outlook, but always a holistic outlook free from all prejudice. 2. Concern for humanity and the environment - Humanity is part of nature, and if nature is not cared for, it will boomerang on humankind. Only the right education, and deep affection between people everywhere, will resolve our many problems including the environmental challenges. 3. Religious spirit, which includes the scientific temper - The religious mind is alone, not lonely. It is in communion with people and nature. G. Narayan 1998 p. 64. [Emphasis added. Krishnamurti's reply as presented here is non-verbatim, edited for brevity].
  111. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1948. Public meeting "convened specially for the benefit of educationists and teachers". [The prefix Sjt. (abbr. of Srijut) used in transcription before Krishnamurti's name is an expression of respect].
  112. ^ "Surely a school is a place where one learns about the totality, the wholeness of life. Academic excellence is absolutely necessary, but a school includes much more than that. It is a place where both the teacher and the taught explore not only the outer world, the world of knowledge, but also their own thinking, their own behaviour. From this they begin to discover their own conditioning and how it distorts their thinking. This conditioning is the self to which such tremendous and cruel importance is given. Freedom from conditioning and its misery begins with this awareness. It is only in such freedom that true learning can take place. In this school it is the responsibility of the teacher to sustain with the student a careful exploration into the implications of conditioning and thus end it." J. Krishnamurti 1984. From a statement Krishnamurti originally composed in 1975 for the Oak Grove School (Ojai, California), later revised by him and school staff. Distributed at Ojai, 1984. Grohe 1991 "[Chapter 3 (not numbered):] Ojai".
  113. ^ G. Narayan 1998 p. 54. Krishnamurti's reply to question by the Vice-Chancelor of the Sri Lanka University. G. Narayan, who was Krishnamurti's nephew and had been involved in his educational projects for decades, was present at the discussion and adds that he felt like "hiding under the table" upon hearing Krishnamurti's verdict. However in a later private discussion Krishnamurti stated that a new mind may yet emerge from the schools, offering a silver lining "to the whole cloud of our educational effort." G. Narayan 1998 p. 56.
  114. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pages 17, 19, 20. Sloss 1993 p. 108.
  115. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 279. [Emphasis in original].
  116. ^ See M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 21 for death threats against him by religious nationalists while in Bucharest in 1930. C. V. Williams writes of an official ban of his lectures in New Zealand in 1933 - against which George Bernard Shaw protested on his behalf. Williams 2004 pp. 208-209. She also describes a campaign against him by Roman Catholic bishops in Argentina in 1935. Williams 2004 p. 222. One of the people who first encountered Krishnamurti during his then visits to New Zealand was young Derek Freeman, who later became a well-known anthropologist. Their brief association has been considered a formative influence in Freeman's professional and personal life. Tuzin 2002 pp. 1013, 1015.
  117. ^ Some later examples: Jayakar 1986 p. 301 discusses changes in his language during the 1960s; in p. 296 she comments on his special "use of language". M. Lutyens 1983 JM, p. 234 quotes Krishnamurti as stating during a 1979 discussion that throughout his speaking career "his perception" of the teaching was "not changing parallel to the language."
  118. ^ Krishnamurti sometimes commented on the limitation of language (and by extension, on the limitation of thought) as a tool to convey the teaching. In the opinion of M. Lutyens, such limitation was responsible for the repetitiveness and the sometimes obvious contradictions in his early language. M. Lutyens 1983 JM, p. 63. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 281-282, 287. Jayakar 1986 p. 463 writes of Krishnamurti's "seeming contradiction" during a discussion held much later and how she reconciled it. In another occasion - where he was accused of "inconsistency" by a different person - he retorted, "to be consistent is to be mechanical"; however in later reference to this incident he remarked that one could discern the "undercurrent of unity" in the teaching if one studied it "with some care". G. Narayan 1998 p. 59.
  119. ^ Williams 2004 p. 191.
  120. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1936 para. 18. Retrieved 2010-03-09. Talk also included in J. Krishnamurti 1991.
  121. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 280-282, 308 [General Sources in "Notes and Sources"]. Letter to C. Jinarajadasa, a senior Theosophist and longtime friend: "I am having a good thinking and 'meditating'. In other words samādi." (11 December 1931. Held [c. 1975] at AA. His biographers give the Sanskrit term samadhi different meanings, sometimes depending on context: retreat from the world, bliss, enlightenment, oneness with reality etc.). Letters to E. Lutyens, in possession [c. 1975] of M. Lutyens: "My mind is so serene but concentrated and I am watching it like a cat a mouse... I want to finish with all the superficialities I have." (11 December 1931). "I'm trying to make it clear, trying to build a bridge for others to come over... You have no idea how difficult is to express the inexpressible & what's expressed is not truth." (26 March 1932). "I am full of something tremendous. I can't tell you in words what it is like, a bubbling joy, a living silence, an intense awareness like a living flame." (21 September 1932). See also letters to E. Lutyens of "late November 1934", 21 April 1936, and 31 January 1938 ("I am bursting with the intensity of love,... I am intoxicated, intelligently, wisely. It's amazing and it's so absurd to put it into words; it becomes so banal" [emphasis added]). M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 33, 40, 44-45. Letters held [c. 1990] at BPA. M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 215 ["Sources for Notes" in "Notes"].
  122. ^ Sloss 1993 p. 209.
  123. ^ M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, p. 280. "[Krishnamurti] seemed to reach ... the attainment of an ecstasy that has never left him." Vernon 2001 pp. 200, 204. Vernon calls the newly experienced "quality of awareness ... a fundamental element in his teachings after the war and beyond." See also Landau 1943 "[Chapter:] Krishnamurti in Carmel" pp. 258-288. Sloss 1993 p. 118 attributes Krishnamurti's "new and joyful exuberance" to his being at the time, a "happy lover" rather than an "enlightened mystic". This is disputed by M. Lutyens 1996 "Chapter 16", wherein she points that Krishnamurti's new-found ecstasy was expressed (in correspondence) prior to the start of the affair with Rosalind Rajagopal.
  124. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 84. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 34. "There has always been some mystery as to how much K really remembers." She states that he was capable of startling recollections, but as a rule "his mind is sharply focused in the present." M. Lutyens implies that his then contemporary inner experiences were a factor in the loss of memory, and considers this compatible with his newly formulated idea of the past as a dead weight. Williams 2004 p. 181 finds M. Lutyens' explanations of the reputed memory loss "difficult to understand". See also Jayakar 1986 p. 44n. And in footnote below.
  125. ^ "Right meditation is really the most wonderful phenomenon one can experience." M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 58. Quoting from Krishnamurti letter of 31 August 1943 to Emily Lutyens held [c. 2004] at HL (Williams 2004 p. 526 [in "Notes": no. 19]). He had been articulating his views on meditation in general for several years prior, but there was a new emphasis on right meditation that would become a constant: "Do you know what right meditation is? Don't you want to discover for yourself the truth of the matter? And will you ever discover that truth if you accept on authority what right meditation is? This is an immense question. To discover the art of meditation you must know the whole depth and breadth of this extraordinary process called thinking. If you accept some authority who says, 'Meditate along these lines', you are merely a follower, the blind servant of a system or an idea. Your acceptance of authority is based on the hope of gaining a result, and that is not meditation." J. Krishnamurti 1964 p. 55. (Context-based weblink: paragraphs 166-167, retrieved 2010-06-24). For another concise commentary on meditation see the latter part of "Chapter XV: Experience - Satisfaction - Duality - Meditation" in J. Krishnamurti 1975 pp. 111-117. Retrieved 2010-07-23.
  126. ^ During this time period he also took the opportunity to clarify his position on healing - there were rumors, and people would sometimes visit him seeking healing - when answering a related question in 1931: "I once had a friend whom, by chance, I healed. Some months later was taken to prison for some crime. Which would you rather have: a Teacher who will show you the way to keep permanently whole, or one who will momentarily heal your wounds?" J. Krishnamurti 1931 p. 15. M. Lutyens was convinced Krishnamurti had genuine healing and clairvoyant powers. She wrote that he was loath to talk about either, and not interested in developing them. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 282-283. Williams 2004 pp. 328, 340, 370-372. Krishnamurti's healing sessions and related private discussion with Vimala Thakar. Jayakar 1986 pp. 87, 106, 438. [The above concern so-called spiritual (as opposed to physiological) healing, a term that may also refer to faith healing or therapeutic touch, among other uses. It is unclear whether Krishnamurti's reputed healing ability had anything in common with such practices].
  127. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 42. Jayakar 1986 "Chapter 10: 'You are the World'" pp. 105-116.
  128. ^ "Is the comprehension of truth a question of choice involving the study of various theories, arguments, and logical conclusions which demand only intellectual effort? Will this way lead us anywhere? Perhaps to intellectual argumentation, but a man who is suffering desires to know and, to him, concepts and theories are utterly useless. Or is there another way, a choiceless perception?... To discern truth, thought must be unbiased, mind must be without want, choiceless." J. Krishnamurti 1936 para. 12. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
  129. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 44. Also J. Krishnamurti 1975 pp. 29-30. "We are occupied with one little corner of consciousness which is most of our life; the rest, which we call the subconscious, with all its motives, its fears, its racial and inherited qualities, we do not even know how to get into. Now I am asking you, is there such a thing as the subconscious at all? We use that word very freely. We have accepted that there is such a thing and all the phrases and jargon of the analysts and psychologists have seeped into the language; but is there such a thing? And why is it that we give such extraordinary importance to it? It seems to me that it is as trivial and stupid as the conscious mind - as narrow, bigoted, conditioned, anxious and tawdry. So is it possible to be totally aware of the whole field of consciousness and not merely a part, a fragment, of it? If you are able to be aware of the totality, then you are functioning all the time with your total attention, not partial attention. This is important to understand because when you are being totally aware of the whole field of consciousness there [is] no friction. It is only when you divide consciousness ... that there is friction." [Krishnamurti in this and other instances uses the term "subconscious" to mean what in early 21st-century relevant scientific literature is formally called the unconscious]. Weblink: "Chapter 3" retrieved 2010-06-25. (Context at document paragraphs 64-66).
  130. ^ Encyclopedia Americana 2010.
  131. ^ Krishnamurti's circle of acquaintances and friends during this period in California included a number of well-known individuals, among them the composer Igor Stravinsky, playwright Bertold Brecht, novelist Thomas Mann, and philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russell. He also met with renowned actress Greta Garbo, who considered herself a "serious spiritual student." Vernon 2001 p. 205.
  132. ^ Bedford 1974 p. 361. Bedford quotes Huxley's then wife, Maria, stating her impression of Krishnamurti as "charming and amusing and so simple." [p. 381]. In the induced isolation of the war years, the Huxleys and Krishnamurti became very close. See pp. 403, 406, 422 of same.
  133. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, pp. 92, 95-96. Huxley wrote the comprehensive foreword to The First and Last Freedom, a Krishnamurti book that generated considerable interest at the time of its publication in 1954. Huxley, Aldous (1954). "Foreword". in J. Krishnamurti 1975. pp. 9-18. J. Krishnamurti Online. JKO 306. Retrieved 2010-07-08. He also served as one of the original trustees of the Happy Valley School. Bedford 1974 p. 504.
  134. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 209. See also J. Krishnamurti 1943. Pamphlet, consists of talks in Ojai and Pennsylvania during 1940, originally published in that year by the SPT. Republished by Sydney's Currawong, known as a publisher or licencee of antiwar pamphlets and books from a wide variety of authors, as well as of other works of political nature.
  135. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 55.
  136. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 210.
  137. ^ Jayakar 1986 p. 98.
  138. ^ Krishnamurti had been speaking in Ojai since the early 1920s, and annual camps had been organized there since 1928. M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, pp. 47, 74.
  139. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, pp. 59-60. Initially, Krishnamurti (along with D. Rajagopal and others) was a trustee of KWINC. Eventually he ceased being a trustee, leaving D. Rajagopal as President - a turn of events that according to M. Lutyens constituted "a circumstance that was to have most unhappy consequences."
  140. ^ According to M. Lutyens this was first articulated in reply to a question in Ojai in 1944. M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 61. For an example see J. Krishnamurti 1944 paragraphs 16, 18-19. Retrieved 2010-06-02.
  141. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1949 para. 20. "There is no gap between seeing and acting". Retrieved 2010-11-30. Additionally such "seeing", in this view, involves the whole organism and produces an understanding capable of effecting actual and permanent change to one's outlook. J. Krishnamurti 1962.
  142. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1956 para. 3. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
  143. ^ Sloss 1993 pp. 207-209, 210. Krishnamurti's reputed memory loss extended to this illness and its circumstances, and also to a serious bout of chicken pox he suffered in 1933. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 24, 64-65, 100-103.
  144. ^ These included former freedom campaigners from the Indian independence movement. Vernon 2001 p. 219.
  145. ^ Jayakar 1986 "Chapter 11: 'Go and Make Friends with the Trees' " pp. 117-130. Jayakar's eyewitness account of the process. She states in p. 131 that Krishnamurti asked them to keep the incident secret, which the sisters felt was because he "did not wish it to confuse the precision, clarity, and directness of the teaching". Krishnamurti made similar requests of others through the years.
  146. ^ Around 1950, Krishnamurti again found himself embroiled - albeit tangentially - in a lawsuit in India. This time concerning the legal separation and custody case of Nandini Mehta, Jayakar's sister. It was argued in court that she had been influenced by Krishnamurti in leaving her husband and initiating the legal proceedings, actions that were unprecedented in India. Krishnamurti, in a series of talks in India at the time had addressed what he considered as the "hypocricy of Indian society, the moral stances of religious teachers and householders, the inferior position of the woman and her bondage to her husband and his family." Jayakar 1986 p. 156. Also pp. 157, 179-180 of same. According to news reports, the court in ruling against Nandini Mehta commented that "there was [not] any room for doubt that the teachings ... must have had their effect upon her mind". Time 1950. Because of this and similar cases adverse or unflattering comments appeared in the local and international press, a segment of which apparently often considered Krishnamurti as a ripe celebrity-gossip subject. Williams 2004 pp. 299-301.
  147. ^ "Only when thought, which is the product of time, ceases - then only is there the real." J. Krishnamurti 1948 para. 21. Retrieved 2010-09-07. Jayakar 1986 p. 113. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, "Chapter 7: The Ending of Thought" pp. 72-80. M. Lutyens considered this subject as one of the more difficult to grasp.
  148. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1971 p. 185. (Context-based weblink: para. 646 retrieved 2010-08-31). Krishnamurti's back-and-forth with a "questioner" (actually his personal secretary at the time) following the quoted statement is commented on at M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 172-173. Krishnamurti elaborated on the ending of thought often; another example can be found at "[Chapter 66 (not numbered):] Cessation of Thought". J. Krishnamurti 1956 pp. 169-171. J.Krishnamurti Online. JKO 179. Retrieved 2010-08-31.
  149. ^ Buultjens, Ralph (1996). "Foreword". in J. Krishnamurti 1996. pp. vii-ix. Context from p. viii. [Authorlink retrieved 2010-10-26].
  150. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1944 para. 2 retrieved 2010-10-06.
  151. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 95.
  152. ^ Title: J. Krishnamurti 1953. Commentary: Williams 2004 p. 314.
  153. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 JM, pp. 81, 86-87, 94-95. Williams 2004 pp. 326, 385-386.
  154. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1974 para. 62. Retrieved 2010-10-20. Krishnamurti's reply to audience question: "[Y]ou referred to yourself several times as 'the speaker' rather than in the first person. Is there a reason for that?"
  155. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 213. Williams 2004 pp. 396-397.
  156. ^ Despite his repudiation of all authority and its trappings, Krishnamurti continued until the end of his life (and beyond, see Afterword) to occasionally be the object of unasked-for public admiration or adulation, especially in India. Jayakar 1986 p. 144. Vernon 2001 pp. 220, 246. M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, p. 36. M. Lutyens calls the Indian audiences "far more demonstrative and reverential than the Western ones". This behavior surprized, and sometimes disturbed, a number of his associates. Sloss 1993 p. 253. Vernon 2001 pp. 255-256. As time went by, the "spineless devotion" of audiences everywhere would invite Krishnamurti's derision; he was similarly "infuriated" by the "blank, inactive acceptance" of his words. Vernon 2001 p. 231. Los Angeles Times 1928. Report from the last day (27 May) of the 1928 International Star Congress, held at Ojai. "[Krishnamurti] was glad that some [in his audience] disagree with him, proving that they are doing their own thinking."
  157. ^ Among them the spiritual teachers Ramana Maharshi (Ramana 1958 pp. 46, 200), Anandamayi Ma (Jayakar 1986 p. 144), and Vimala Thakar (Williams 2004 pp. 340-341).
  158. ^ Jayakar 1986 pp. 144-145. In a typical exchange, Anandamayi Ma asked him, "Why do you deny gurus? You who are the Guru of Gurus". To which Krishnamurti replied, "People use the guru as a crutch". Krishnamurti had briefly flirted with the idea of becoming a monk in the late 1920s, later viewing the incident as a "temptation" he overcame. M. Lutyens 1975 FSG, pp. 245, 270-271.
  159. ^ Such as discussions with the Vedantin Swami Venkatesananda (J. Krishnamurti 1987 "Part IV: Two Conversations: J. Krishnamurti and Swami Venkatesananda" pp. 137-183), the then Hindu [later Buddhist] scholar Jagganath Upadhyaya, and the Buddhist scholars Samdong Rimpoche and Walpola Rahula. J. Krishnamurti 2003 "Part One" pp. 3-163. J. Krishnamurti 1985 "Chapter 1: Illusion and Intelligence" pp. 1-23. J. Krishnamurti 1988 "[Chapter 1:] Discussion with Buddhists: 7 November 1985" through "[Chapter 3:] Discussion with Buddhists: 11 November 1985" pp. 25-58 [pages cumulative, chapters not numbered].
  160. ^ The two men had good rapport and mutual admiration. After their first meeting (in 1956) the Dalai Lama characterized Krishnamurti as a "great soul". Jayakar 1986 p. 203. Krishnamurti very much enjoyed the Lama's company, and by his own admission could not bring up his anti-guru views, mindful of the Lama's feelings. Vernon 2001 p. 231.
  161. ^ Nehru met with Krishnamurti before and after he became prime minister. Jayakar 1986 pp. 121-123, 142, 397. In his later meetings, Nehru, then head of government, was described as "anguished" and "tired", facing continuing political crises following India’s partition and independence. He spoke of his own confusion, and asked about "disintegration" and about "right action and thought". Krishnamurti elaborated at some length, saying in one instance, "Understanding of the self only arises in relationship, in watching yourself in relationship to people, ideas, and things; to trees, the earth, and the world around you and within you. Relationship is the mirror in which the self is revealed. Without self-knowledge there is no basis for right thought and action." Nehru asked, "How does one start?" to which Krishnamurti replied, "Begin where you are. Read every word, every phrase, every paragraph of the mind, as it operates through thought." Jayakar 1986 p. 142.
  162. ^ Among others, he was acquainted with, and (by their admission) influenced the works of, the mythologist Joseph Campbell (Blau 1995 p. 64), artists Jackson Pollock (Britannica 2010) and Beatrice Wood (Blau 1995 p. 94), and counterculture author Alan Watts (Watts 1972 pp. 104-105, 111-112, 124). Eckhart Tolle, author and speaker on spiritual subjects, and self-help lecturer and author Deepak Chopra, both named Krishnamurti as one of their influences. Parker 2009 p. 104 (Tolle). Blau 1995 p. 233 (Chopra). Writer and philosopher Iris Murdoch also met with Krishnamurti (Blau 1995 p. 191) but their videotaped discussion failed to create a spark according to M. Lutyens 1988 JM, p. 89. However, the well-known or famous were a small percentage of his counterparts in discussions; and while his availability to individuals (famous or not) fluctuated, it never ceased: "Beginning in the late 1970s he saw fewer people, but at ninety [in the year 1985] he is again available to those who seek him out; he never closes his doors to anyone–the young man with hallucinations, in communication with satellites; the woman in sorrow; the adolescent; the old; the blind." Jayakar 1986 p. 493.
  163. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, "Chapter 10: Krishnamurti's Notebook" pp. 107-119. Those present were as usual mystified and initially alarmed by the visible effects of the process. Again, several of them also reported sensing the (non-personified) presence that Krishnamurti referred to in a contemporaneous journal he kept. (Published years later as his Notebook).
  164. ^ Britannica 2010.
  165. ^ Among other works Bohm's Wholeness and the Implicate Order (Bohm 1980) embraces several concepts also present in Krishnamurti's teaching, such as the proposition that the observer is the observed. See "Chapter XV: The Thinker and the Thought". J. Krishnamurti 1975 pp. 108-110. J.Krishnamurti Online. JKO 306. Retrieved 2010-04-27. The chapter is devoted to an exposition of this idea - one out of many such presentations that Krishnamurti made over the years. Bohm was attempting to apply a similar idea to the field of quantum mechanics. Another point of confluence was the idea of nonlocality, a postulated quantum-mechanical property prominent in Bohm's interpretation (Peat 1997 p. 221 onwards) whose action, he believed, extended to the workings of the mind. (Peat 1997 p. 225. Bohm 1990). In similar fashion, Krishnamurti held that true insight on the part of a few could profoundly affect human affairs, and human consciousness as a whole. Bohm would eventually serve as a Krishnamurti Foundation and school trustee. Peat 1997 p. 228.
  166. ^ Jiddu Krishnamurti bibliography has a listing of published materials containing discussions between Krishnamurti and Bohm. Although Krishnamurti's philosophy delved into fields as diverse as religious studies, education, psychology, physics, and consciousness studies, he was not at the time - nor arguably c. 2003 - well known in academic circles. Nevertheless, Krishnamurti held individual discussions with a number of scientists, and less frequently within specially arranged seminars or through lecture series; among his counterparts were physicists Fritjof Capra and George Sudarshan, medical researcher Jonas Salk, biologist Rupert Sheldrake, psychiatrist David Shainberg, computer scientists and technologists, and psychotherapists representing various theoretical orientations. Martin 2003 includes comments on Krishnamurti and the academic world.
  167. ^ Peat 1997 p. 293.
  168. ^ Peat 1997 pp. 285, 330. Their falling out was partly due to questions regarding Krishnamurti's private behavior; on his part Krishnamurti questioned Bohm's apparent lack of transformation. Another issue was Bohm's frustration with personality clashes within the Krishnamurti institutions and his distaste for what he considered as the exceedingly "reverential" attitude of some people in Krishnamurti's inner circle - an attitude Krishnamurti did not care to address, in Bohm's view. Peat 1997 p. 284. Later, he criticized certain aspects of the teaching on philosophical, methodological, and psychological grounds. He also criticized what he described as Krishnamurti's occasional "verbal manipulations" when deflecting challenges, and after Krishnamurti's death he became especially troubled by the revelations concerning the long and secret love affair that Krishnamurti had had with Rosalind Rajagopal. Peat 1997 pp. 305-306. Eventually, he questioned some of the reasoning concerning the nature of thought and self, yet he never abandoned his belief that "Krishnamurti was on to something." However, Peat 1997 p. 306, qualifies some of the criticism by drawing attention to Bohm's bouts of clinical depression. Peat 1997 "Chapter 15: Dialogue and Disorder" pp. 282-302; "Afterword" pp. 323-330; and also pp. 217, 226-231, 250. Bohm was also distressed when Krishnamurti more or less abruptly distanced himself, with the implication that Bohm had become too dependent on him. Peat 1997 p. 285. Alev 1997 p. 2. Retrieved 2010-03-09. According to his biographers Krishnamurti often employed this tactic when in similar situations of perceived dependency. Vernon 2001 pp. 223, 228.
  169. ^ a b Jayakar 1986 p. 369.
  170. ^ Jayakar 1986 p. 277. Vernon 2001 p. 231. M. Lutyens comments on the "near vehemence" with which Krishnamurti sometimes approached the subjects of his later talks and discussions, such as in this example: "There is an action, total, complete, holistic action in which thought does not interfere at all. Are you waiting for me to tell you? That’s rather cheap! The speaker does all the work and you listen and say, 'Yes, I agree'. What is the point of that? But if you really, desperately want to find out, like a drowning man desperate to find some kind of thing to hang on to, to save himself, then like him you exert all your energy." M. Lutyens 1983 JM, p. 221. From a talk at Saanen, July 1978. [M. Lutyens identifies it as the "2nd Talk, 14 July 1978". However J.Krishnamurti Online lists it as the "3rd Talk, 13 July 1978". As of October 2010]. Text: J. Krishnamurti 1978 para. 33. Retrieved 2010-04-29. His regular admonitions - for the listeners to actively test his words - were taking a note of urgency, as seen in the same talk para. 40 (retrieved 2010-05-02): "That thought, stored up in the brain as memory, knowledge, those very brain cells have become limited. For god's sake see this... But when you have an insight into all this, the very brain cells are no longer limited. The brain cells are functioning totally differently. Do this, please, do it! Don't say, 'Yes, how marvellous', 'What a wonderful speech that was' - which is all romantic nonsense, emotionalism." In another occasion he echoed his earlier exasperation with his audiences, which he had started expressing after the dissolution of the Order of the Star : he remarked to a friend after addressing a large crowd in Santa Monica in March 1970, that "he felt he'd been singing to the deaf". Williams 2004 p. 374.
  171. ^ Williams 2004 pp. 385-386.
  172. ^ Jayakar 1986 pp. 282-283. Williams 2004 pp. 386-387, briefly discusses the relationship between Krishnamurti and then contemporary counterculture, as well as his influence on the Western intelligentsia of the time. Vernon 2001 p. 230 has information about the talks at Saanen. pp. 234-235 a background on the events of the 1960s and Krishnamurti's position. Krishnamurti had started giving regular talks in universities and colleges at that time, while the meetings at Saanen were held annually from 1961 to 1985.
  173. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1971. Context at paragraphs 5, 24, 30.
  174. ^ "The content of our consciousness is the common ground of all humanity... Your consciousness, what you think, what you feel, your reactions, your anxiety, your loneliness, your sorrow, your pain, your search for something that is not merely physical but goes beyond all thought, is the same as that of a person living in India or Russia or America. They all go through the same problems as you do, the same problems of relationship with each other, man, woman. So we are all standing on the same ground of consciousness. Our consciousness is common to all of us and therefore we are not individuals. Please do consider this. We have been trained, educated, religiously as well as scholastically, to think that we are individuals, separate souls, striving for ourselves, but that is an illusion because our consciousness is common to all mankind. So we are mankind. We are not separate individuals fighting for ourselves. This is logical, this is rational, sane. We are not separate entities with separate psychological content, struggling for ourselves, but we are, each one of us, actually the rest of human kind." J. Krishnamurti 1982 p. 86. (From a talk in Amsterdam, 19 September 1981. Context-based weblink: para. 144 retrieved 2010-06-20).
  175. ^ "Violence and its opposite must always contain violence - the observer who is violent, perceives that he is violent and creates the opposite which is non-violence, as an idea... The good is not the opposite of evil, but one has this tendency of the evil, which is to do harm, to get angry, to be violent, to be acquisitive, greedy, envious and so on, and realizing that, one demands to be good. The very demand creates the opposite, so in that way there is no change at all ... if you deny hate, envy (deny it, not build resistance against it, not escape from it, nor accept it) ... in that very denial is the positive which is love in which there is no hate. Love is not the opposite of hate." J. Krishnamurti 1967 paragraphs 514, 288. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
  176. ^ Since in his view, the continuing and intractable world crises are actually reflections of personal crises, their resolution requires an inward (resulting in an outward) revolution. "There must be some kind of a revolution, some kind of an immediate change, a mutation that is not merely an intellectual, emotional outcome, but one that takes place totally in the whole consciousness." (J. Krishnamurti 1961 para. 2. Retrieved 2010-10-06). However Krishnamurti also held that consciousness is its content. "What you are, is the content of your consciousness." (J. Krishnamurti 1983 pp. 72-73. From the First Public Talk in Madras, 25 December 1982. Context-based weblink: para. 153 retrieved 2010-10-07); and so the psychological revolution is accompanied by mutation in the brain cells themselves. "The brain cells contain all memories, knowledge, experience. The brain cells are the whole content of your consciousness. And there must be a mutation in that, which means the brain cells themselves bring about a mutation in themselves." (J. Krishnamurti 1984 para. 23. Retrieved 2010-10-06). Such mutation - regeneration of the brain - can only happen instantaneously and in toto. "If we do not bring about a mutation in the present, a mutation psychologically, so that the very brain cells themselves are deeply changed... then the future is what we are now." (J. Krishnamurti 1984 para. 12. Retrieved 2010-10-06). Further, just "seeing" the need for a new brain as a matter of fact, objectively, and without judgement (and therefore without pondering it in time) can bring this about. "The very act of seeing brings about that mutation. That is, when you see something, you understand it immediately; the truth of that brings about the total alteration in one's attitude towards life." (J. Krishnamurti 1961 para. 14. Retrieved 2010-10-06). Among others see Jayakar 1986 pp. 411-412. And J. Krishnamurti 2000 pp. 100-105, which comprise a partial record of J. Krishnamurti 1983. Several of his talks contained in J. Krishnamurti 1992 including J. Krishnamurti 1962. Also: Neuroplasticity which posits that the anatomy of the brain changes through experience, and that new neural connections can appear in areas of the brain that were previously considered immutable. Neurotheology. d'Aquili 1999.
  177. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1995 pp. 15-16. In reply to question by Jayakar at Brockwood Park, 11 June 1978.
  178. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1985. Contains related discussions with David Bohm from 1980, commented in M. Lutyens 1988 JM, p. 19. Krishnamurti held that humankind's personal and social problems (he made no distinction between the two) have been, and continue to be, the same throughout history. This he saw as proof and the result of the lack of psychological evolution; absent a radically different approach, the same problems are bound to continue existing indefinitely. (He made no such claim regarding biological evolution, which he generally accepted as obvious. See "Chapter 1: The Roots of Psychological Conflict" pp. 9-29). As these problems demonstrably have not, and in this view cannot, be resolved temporally and in stages, he called for an investigation into whether a total, spontaneous approach - he spoke of some sort of uncoerced psychosomatic mutation - may be possible instead. He added that the widely held belief in psychological evolution may in fact prevent such individual mutation from occurring - by giving thought (and individuals) a means of escape from actually facing the problem immediately and comprehensively. ("Chapter 6: Can Insight Bring About a Mutation of the Brain Cells?" pp. 112-136; "Chapter 9: Senility and the Brain Cells" pp. 177-203). He rejected all theories or methods of psychological evolution, be they analytical, philosophical, sociopolitical, religious, or metaphysical; explicit or implied; and regardless of their source in Eastern, Western or other disciplines or traditions. In his view, the ever-increasing commentary (and resulting increasing complexity) of all such theories and methods, in reality serves to evolve the problems rather than their solutions. ("Chapter 2: Cleansing the Mind of the Accumulation of Time" pp. 30-48; "Chapter 4: Breaking the Pattern of Ego-centred Activity" pp. 77-95; "Chapter 11: The Ending of 'Psychological' Knowledge" pp. 223-233). The same subject was also elaborated in discussions with Jonas Salk in 1983. (M. Lutyens 1988 JM, pp. 69-70). This concept of the non-existence of psychological time was in the opinion of his biographers one of the harder to understand ideas that Krishnamurti introduced, along with the interrelated concepts of the limitation of thought, and of the ending of thought.
  179. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1996 p. 257. Originaly composed by Krishnamurti 21 October 1980. It was later minimally edited by him. Full text: J. Krishnamurti 1980. In a 1974 discussion with associates in India he answered a related question succinctly: "You were asking, 'what is the teaching?' Right? I say, the teaching says, 'Where you are the other is not'." [Emphasis in original]. Jayakar 1986 p. 310.
  180. ^ Jayakar 1986 pp. 340-343. Jayakar was a close friend and biographer of Indira Gandhi, and had been a political and cultural activist in India since the end of World War II. Background information on the State of Emergency in India: Indian Emergency (1975-1977).
  181. ^ A fifth Foundation was organized later. See KFA 1969. "Excerpt from the document establishing the Krishnamurti Foundation of America, in 1969." [Similar in all Foundation charters]. The various institutions were not always free of problems. There had been recurring questions about how at some of them should implement their mandate, occasional clashes of personalities, confusion over copyrights, and difficulties with finances. Krishnamurti had taken a hands-off approach towards the running of the schools and other institutions, but in several instances - and to his declared discomfort - he had to intervene, "relentlessly" questioning his associates, some of whom felt they were under undue pressure. School trustees considered the lack of clear, well-defined direction set by Krishnamurti as putting them in a difficult position, while he apparently feared that any rigid course set by him could become more important than fulfiling the schools' objectives. Jayakar 1986 pp. 282, 283-289, 308. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 193-195. Vernon 2001 p. 238. [There is general agreement among his biographers that at the time of Krishnamurti's death (February 1986) the institutions appeared to be running smoothly, overseeing what was by then estimated to have had collectively become a multi-million US dollar worldwide, efficient operation. See also Williams 2004 pp. 421, 446].
  182. ^ Lilliefelt 1995. The complicated settlement dissolved the K & R Foundation (a previous entity), and transferred assets to the KFA. However certain disputed documents remained in the possession of D. Rajagopal (he had previously donated other related material to The Huntington Library in San Marino, California), and he received partial repayment for his attorney's fees. Erna Lilliefelt, a founding trustee of the KFA, was the person principally involved with the litigation on behalf of Krishnamurti and the KFA. M. Lutyens placed the preponderance of responsibility for the acrimony of the lawsuits - and resulting damage to Krishnamurti's reputation - on the Rajagopals. In her view, they harbored personal animosity, related to their loss of influence in Krishnamurti's life. See M. Lutyens 1996, for her account of the troubled relationship. Radha Rajagopal Sloss, in Sloss 1993, offers a different assessment. "Chapter 28: A New Circle in the Shadow" and "Chapter 29: The Wheels of Justice" pp. 285-317 [cumulative] of same, are specific to the litigation and to Rajagopals' position. Following the dissolution of the Order of the Star, D. Rajagopal had been the head or co-head of a number of successive corporations and trusts, chartered to publish Krishnamurti's talks, discussions and other writings, and also to organize and finance his itinerary.
  183. ^ The rift had started several years before the legal complaints were filed; the ending, in the late 1950s, of the long love affair between Krishnamurti and Rosalind Rajagopal also damaged their friendship, (Sloss 1993 "Chapter 24: India Revisited" pp. 250-256. M. Lutyens 1996 "Chapter 22"), while since the early 1960s D. Rajagopal no longer accompanied Krishnamurti or acted as his aide - a function undertaken in late 1964 by Alain Naude, a young South African who Krishnamurti originally met in 1963, and afterwards by Mary Zimbalist (née Taylor, 1915-2008) a New Yorker from a well-known family who attended him for almost two decades, until his death. M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 128 (Naude), p. 60 (Zimbalist). M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, p. 14.
  184. ^ As of 2010. Jayakar 1986 pp. 132-133, 292-293, 407-409, 439-440. M. Lutyens devotes the bulk of several chapters to some of these discussions, including M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, "Chapter 20: Who or What is Krishnamurti?" pp. 220-232; "Chapter 21: The Source of all Energy" pp. 233-238. Vernon 2001 pp. 248-251.
  185. ^ The existence of the process, its long history, and its effects, were originally revealed to the general public in 1975, thanks to the first volume of M. Lutyens' biography of Krishnamurti. (M. Lutyens 1975). First-hand, in depth descriptions can be found in Krishnamurti's Notebook. (J. Krishnamurti 2003). M. Lutyens devoted a whole chapter to this book in the second volume of her biography. Briefly, she also mentioned what she thought were "valid" objections raised against its publication - and Krishnamurti's responses to these objections. (M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, "Chapter 10: Krishnamurti's Notebook" pp. 107-119. Objections to publication at p. 119). In previous years Krishnamurti had asked the people who were present at, or knew about, the process, not to talk of it. When Emily Lutyens tried to include an account in her autobiography in 1954 (E. Lutyens 1954), Krishnamurti forbade her to publish it, though he agreed to its "expurgated" publication three years later. (Vernon 2001 pp. 227-228). Vernon states that Krishnamurti "clearly believed, with good reason, that the sensationalism of his early story would cloud the public's perception of his [then] current work".
  186. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 269. M. Lutyens describes a related discussion held in 1979, writing that at the time Krishnamurti seemed as eager as herself to "make the discovery". He additionally remarked that if he had deliberately sat down to write the teaching he doubted he could produce it. M. Lutyens 1983 JM, p. 224 onwards.
  187. ^ He stated that evil exists, but not as opposite to goodness, rather as something completely alien and unrelated to it. Jayakar 1986 pp. 293, 442. J. Krishnamurti 1987 "Part III: Chapter 2: On good and evil" pp. 124-136 (discussion with Alain Naude).
  188. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 71, 226, 230, 234.
  189. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 226-227, 228, 230. M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, pp. 8, 31, 62, 100, 137; "Introduction" pp. 1-12 of same includes a brief overview of the subjects of these discussions.
  190. ^ He seemed certain that everyone should be able to grasp the teaching, stating that if the mind required to do so was unique to him then "it is not worth anything." M. Lutyens 1983 JM, p. 227. From the previously noted discussion of 1979, which was recorded by Mary Zimbalist.
  191. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 JM, pp. 235-237. Krishnamurti, when in the company of close friends, sometimes acted or spoke in a mystifying manner, as when he told Mary Zimbalist in 1985: "There are things you don't know. Enormous, and I can't tell you." M. Lutyens 1988 JM, p. 115.
  192. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 237-238. Statement dictated by Krishnamurti to Mary Zimbalist, 21 February 1980. Krishnamurti uses the third person in this statement. He later spoke of these particular experiences in other occasions, mentioning them in the discussion with David Bohm of 1 April 1980. J. Krishnamurti 1985 p. 18. (Context-based weblink: para. 146 retrieved 2010-08-04).
  193. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1985 p. 18. Discussion with David Bohm, 1 April 1980. [Emphasis in original]. (Context-based weblink: para. 148 retrieved 2010-08-15).
  194. ^ Jayakar 1986 pp. 379-380. Krishnamurti had urged Burnier, a KFI trustee, to stand in the election.
  195. ^ Jayakar 1986 pp. 404-405. "Krishnaji's return held a great poignancy". Vernon 2001 pp. 268-270 comments on the contemporary Theosophical Society, especially after Burnier's election. He writes of the changes in the Society's outlook since the "missionary" era of Annie Besant and Leadbeater, and of its relationship with, and influence by, Krishnamurti and his message.
  196. ^ M. Lutyens 1988 JM, pp. 49-50.
  197. ^ M. Lutyens 1988 JM, p. 43. J. Krishnamurti 2003 p. 81. "It was a morning that was made new by death, not the death of decay, disease or accident but the death that destroys for creation to be. There is no creation if death does not sweep away all the things that the brain has put together to safeguard the self-centred existence." (Entry of 24 August 1961). Discussion with phycisist David Bohm and psychiatrist David Shainberg: J. Krishnamurti 1976. Public dialogue from the same year: J. Krishnamurti 1976. Discussions with Jayakar and other associates, 1981: Jayakar 1986 "Chapter 40: 'The Meaning of Death' "; "Chapter 41: 'Learn to Die to Yourself Completely.' " pp. 424-440 [cumulative]. J. Krishnamurti 1993 p. 36. "[I]s it possible to live with death? Not morbidly, not in any form of self-destructiveness. Why have we divided death from living? death is part of our life, it is part of our existence ... They are inseparable... Why keep them miles apart? Yes, miles of time apart." (Entry of 16 March 1983. Context-based weblink: para. 91 retrieved 2010-11-15).
  198. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1985 para. 22 retrieved 2010-11-15.
  199. ^ M. Lutyens 1988 JM, pp. 84-85, 95. Transcript of the 1985 talk: J. Krishnamurti 1985. Video of same: J. Krishnamurti 2007. [Part 1 of 8. Duration 9 min 32 sec. Uncredited original source. Not an official release. In this engagement, Krishnamurti received a very rare formal introduction. In the talks organized by associates or affiliated institutions he was never introduced, formally or informally. The audience was sometimes surprized to find him seated on stage and staring intently, having entered quietly (M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 122)]. Krishnamurti had been invited to speak in both occasions by the UN Chapter of the Pacem in Terris Society, a spiritual and social action organization named after the Pacem in Terris encyclical of Pope John XXIII, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli.
  200. ^ a b c Herzberger, Radhika. "Introduction". in J. Krishnamurti 1988. pp 9-21. Radhika Herzberger, Pupul Jayakar's daughter, was an associate and friend of Krishnamurti in India.
  201. ^ For example, in 1970, at age 75, Krishnamurti made 130 public appearances around the world, and he was delivering an average of 120 recorded talks and dialogues per year until the month of his death. Williams 2004 pp. 375, 438. These were in addition to frequent private meetings with individuals and small groups. C.V. Williams considers many of his talks delivered in the last few years of his life "exceptional". Williams 2004 pp. 458-459.
  202. ^ Vernon writes that "his medical record reads like a catalogue of illnesses" and he adds that "his physical resistance to decay was spurred on by a mental capacity that he believed was increasing with age". Vernon 2001 pp. 239-240. In the same passage, he comments on Krishnamurti's lifestyle, mentioning his frugal eating habits, lifelong vegetarianism, abstinence from alcohol, tobacco, caffeine and other stimulants, also describing his regular daily exercise routine. Apparently Krishnamurti never took any type of recreational drug, hallucinogen, or narcotic, and he refused or resisted remedial drugs, with the exception of prescribed medication - to which he often had adverse reactions. Krishnamurti felt that taking good care of his body was his duty, as he considered the body an instrument for the delivery of the teaching. M. Lutyens 1990 pp. 166-167. He was also always meticulous about his appearance and personal grooming - friends commented about his enduring elegant bearing when he was well into old age. Chandmal 1995 p. 19. "Krishnamurti [at eighty-five years old] ... looking extremely elegant." Conversely, a critic stated, "He had always been vain". Sloss 1993 p. 308.
  203. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, pp. 187, 189. Jayakar 1986 p. 496.
  204. ^ Verbatim transcript: J. Krishnamurti 1986. Video: J. Krishnamurti 2007. [Part 1 of 7. Duration 9 min 54 sec. Uncredited original source. Not an official release].
  205. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1988 pp. 147-148. (Context-based weblink: paragraphs 811-812 retrieved 2010-06-24).
  206. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1988 p. 152. [Emphasis in original]. Weblink: "Chapter 11" retrieved 2010-06-25. (Context at document paragraphs 820-821).
  207. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 171. J. Krishnamurti 1970. Statement of Krishnamurti published in all Foundation bulletins regarding interpretations of his message. "From the nineteen twenties I have been saying that there should be no interpreters of the teachings for they distort the teachings and it becomes a means of exploitation. No interpreters are necessary, for each person should observe directly his own activities, not according to any theory or authority. Unfortunately interpreters have sprung up, a fact for which we are in no way responsible. In recent years several people have asserted they are my successors and that they have been specially chosen by me to disseminate the teachings. I have said, and I again repeat, that there are no representatives of Krishnamurti personally or of his teachings during or after his lifetime. I am very sorry that this has to be said again."
  208. ^ However in a 1973 meeting of the trustees of the Krishnamurti Foundations, he said that separately from publishing books and archiving his works, he also wanted them to impart the "perfume" of the teaching, so that the "flowering" would not "wither away". He added that he had no idea how this could happen: "How is the perfume to be carried on? I don’t know — I’ll leave it to you! My wish is that the perfume should be carried on, but I can’t do anything about it." M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 193-195. M. Lutyens (who was apparently present [p. 193]) wrote, "It seemed to me that he was now on rather dangerous ground; he did not want interpreters yet he was in a sense licensing us to interpret him after his death on the grounds that we were preserving 'the perfume' of his teaching." [p. 195]. Krishnamurti made similar remarks in a 1976 meeting of the Foundations' trustees. (M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 215-216).
  209. ^ Trustees of the Krishnamurti Foundation India 1986. "Under no circumstances will the Foundation or any of the institutions under its auspices, or any of its members set themselves up as authorities on Krishnamurti’s teachings. This is in accordance with Krishnamurti’s declaration that no one anywhere should set himself up as an authority on him or his teachings." See also M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 233.
  210. ^ M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, pp. 131, 157 [in "Sources": no. 75]. Quoted from the KFI Bulletin, 1986/3.
  211. ^ M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, "Chapter 11: 'I am Still the Teacher'" pp. 132-147. Krishnamurti had been positively diagnosed with terminal pancreatic cancer in late January 1986 [p. 137]. During the last few weeks of his life, he was basically confined to his bed.
  212. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 JM, pp. 206, 219 [in "Notes": no. 85]. "Verbatim transcription" from audiotape recording made 7 February 1986, held [c. 1990] at BPA. Excerpt: "I was telling them this morning – for seventy years that super-energy – no – that immense energy, immense intelligence, has been using this body. I don’t think people realize what tremendous energy and intelligence went through this body... Nobody, unless the body has been prepared, very carefully, protected and so on – nobody can understand what went through this body. Nobody. Don’t anybody pretend. Nobody. I repeat this: nobody amongst us or the public know what went on... You won’t find another body like this, or that supreme intelligence, operating in a body for many hundred years. You won’t see it again. When he goes, it goes... They’ll all pretend or try to imagine they can get into touch with that. Perhaps they will somewhat if they live the teachings." [Em dashes (–) represent pauses in Krishnamurti's speech]. Earlier the same day, in answering a letter from an associate, he had written, "If you all only knew what you have missed - that vast emptiness". M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, p. 148. "Scribbled" by Krishnamurti "on the side" of letter (dated 5 February 1986) by longtime associate Mary Cadogan. However in M. Lutyens 1990 JM, pp. 205-206, M. Lutyens states that Krishnamurti's answer was spoken, and written down by M. Zimbalist, who had read him Cadogan's note.
  213. ^ a b M. Lutyens 1983 FSG, p. 119.
  214. ^ In his later informal discussions with close associates Krishnamurti wondered whether he was a "freak", a biological oddity, and if so, whether this rendered the teaching useless and inapplicable. He stated that even if him being a "freak" was actually the case (he was unsure of this himself), "Anyone can accept the teaching, see the truth of it. If you make the freak important it rules out everything else." From a discussion with M. Lutyens, 15 June 1979, Brockwood Park. Recorded by Mary Zimbalist. M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. 230. Also p. 227 of same.
  215. ^ Krishnamurti had made his final wishes known during the last meeting (at bedside) with trustees of the Foundations and close associates a few days before he died. He left no estate; his intellectual property rights were always held and managed by affiliated organizations and this was also the case with other material assets he used, such as his residence at Ojai. He had distributed most of his personal belongings (mainly clothing items) to friends in the weeks leading to his death. M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, pp. 144-145; "Chapter 11: 'I am Still the Teacher' " and "Chapter 12: '...if they live the teachings' " pp. 132-154 [cumulative] describe his last days and final illness. Also see M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 201n. Select obituaries: Saxon 1986. Weatherby 1986.
  216. ^ [Time-sensitive information in this section is current as of mid-2008 unless otherwise specified].
  217. ^ Among other projects is an effort to collect the entire body of his work into a coherently edited master reference entitled The Complete Works of J. Krishnamurti: 1910-1986. KFA 2004.
  218. ^ See Foundation websites listed in section External links.
  219. ^ One such project is a Teaching Academy, an introduction to the holistic educational philosophy of Krishnamurti targeted at educators. KFA 2008.
  220. ^ KFT (n/d).
  221. ^ Not linked to the official Foundations or their affiliates. See KAE (n/d) for a listing. [From a Krishnamurti Association in New Zealand (KANZ) project (retrieved 2010-05-25)].
  222. ^ Vernon summarized some of these developments between the years 1986 and 2000. He also commented on the [continuing, as of early 2010] relative paucity of "official" material regarding Krishnamurti's early life, and of his talks, discussions, and writings prior to 1933. He considered this as the Foundations' way of de-emphasizing Krishnamurti's association with the Theosophical Society and the World Teacher Project, and as following Krishnamurti's own assertions: that he was "unconditioned by his past" (according to Vernon still a subject of "hot debate" c. 2001) and that his "mature teaching" was free of Theosophical influence. Vernon 2001 pp. 215, 261-265. Krishnamurti discussed being unconditioned by - and disconnected from - his past in private (in the discussions with associates referred to in Later years above - some specific instances at M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, pp. 170, 226, 227, 230 and Jayakar 1986 p. 388) and publicly. For example, in a public dialogue in 1975 he said: "What is the relationship between the present K and the former K?... I should think very little." When people in the audience asserted they were interested in the subject, he continued, "I am not. The past is dead, buried and gone... How that boy was brought up is totally irrelevant; what is relevant is the present teaching and nothing else." From the First Public Dialogue at Brockwood Park, 9 September 1975. Included in J. Krishnamurti 2000 pp. 86-87. (Context-based weblink: paragraphs 479, 481 retrieved 2010-09-26).
  223. ^ See List of works about Jiddu Krishnamurti.
  224. ^ Vernon 2001 pp. 254-255.
  225. ^ Sloss 1993. Radha Rajagopal Sloss was the daughter of estranged Krishnamurti associates Rosalind Rajagopal (née Williams) and Rajagopal Desikacharya (commonly D. Rajagopal). She had spent her childhood at Arya Vihara (part of Krishnamurti's residence), and while growing up she considered him an extension of her family. She was later involved in the dispute between Krishnamurti and her father, and was subpoenaed during the course of the litigation. Sloss 1993 p. 313; "Chapter 29: Wheels of Justice" pp. 303-317. M. Lutyens 1996 "Chapter 32".
  226. ^ Kanga 1991. Review of Sloss' book in the Times Literary Supplement. See also letter by Beatrice Wood, who had been a decades-long adherent of Krishnamurti. The Link 1994 pp. 27-28. [Newsletter by Krishnamurti associate Friedrich Grohe. Wood letter "reprinted with permission"].
  227. ^ In 1995, the KFA issued a 16-page pamphlet in an attempt to address some of the issues raised by Sloss' book. KFA 1995. The pamphlet includes partial transcripts of conversations recorded on audiotape between Krishnamurti and KFA trustees that took place in January and March 1972, and contain Krishnamurti responses to related questions. [Original (c. 1995) at OA. The matter of the extramarital affair had arisen in the course of the then (1972) ongoing legal dispute with D. Rajagopal. Also see M. Lutyens 1996 "Chapter 27" through "Chapter 30"].
  228. ^ M. Lutyens 1996. Vernon, while acknowledging that "history will not view Krishnamurti in quite the same light", questions the ultimate impact of Sloss' revelations when compared to Krishnamurti's body of work as a whole, adding his opinion that the "injury was in the degree to which people's rigid assumptions about Krishnamurti had been shattered". Vernon 2001 pp. 202-204.
  229. ^ Nearing 1992 pp. 62-64. Helen Nearing (née Knothe) devotes a chapter in this book to her relationship with Krishnamurti, who had fallen in love with her in the 1920s: "[Chapter 5 (not numbered):] The Young Impressionable Krishnamurti" pp. 36-65. Includes her description of a 1923 recurrence of the process at Ehrwald, Austria, during which she attended him. Following a meeting decades later (where Krishnamurti hardly recognized her) she formed the impression he was by then unable to have normal personal relationships. Emily Lutyens, distressed by the end of the World Teacher Project, was on occasion another - private - critic of what she considered his comfortable lifestyle. M. Lutyens 1990 KFT, p. 88. Quotes E. Lutyens' letter of August 1934 held [c. 1990] at OA [p. 217 (in "Notes": no. 39)]. E. Lutyens was also wondering whether Krishnamurti was "escaping from life", adding that he was "always 'retreating'." Williams 2004 pp. 212, 517 [in "Notes": no. 3]. Quotes apparently from the same E. Lutyens letter, dated 14 August 1934, and also from another of 16 September 1934 both held [c. 2005] at VVA. (M. Lutyens 1990 p. 217 places the originals at OA with copies elsewhere). However in the 16 September 1934 letter she stated that she still "loved him with all her heart." Among critics, a particularly vociferous one had been U.G. Krishnamurti. His criticism encompassed J. Krishnamurti's private life, his method of exposition of the teaching, and the teaching itself. Vernon 2001 pp. 257-258.
  230. ^ Skitt, David (2000). "Editor's Introduction: Philosophy without Boundaries". in J. Krishnamurti 2000. pp. xi-xxvii. [Authorlink retrieved 2010-10-26]. Skitt, who calls Krishnamurti's style "emphatic", proposes a context for such emphasis and also repeats the previously noted arguments regarding the limitations of language and the special, evolving meaning Krishnamurti gave to certain terms.
  231. ^ Among many other instances, Krishnamurti commented on the nature of the enquiring mind in J. Krishnamurti 1977 para. 8. Retrieved 2010-03-09. "And to investigate together you need a certain quality of mind that is meditative, that is not jumping to conclusions, that is not affirming or rejecting, but investigating - investigating without any prejudice, without any conclusion, without any end. After all that is a good scientist - not the scientist that is employed by governments, but the scientist who really wants to find truth, at whatever level."
  232. ^ Two examples (of many): J. Krishnamurti 1955. J. Krishnamurti 1969.
  233. ^ M. Lutyens wrote that "bald" Krishnamurti quotes, when taken out of context, sometimes "puzzled" or incenced people who were ignorant of, or did not pay attention to, Krishnamurti's often elaborate expositions. She gives a few examples of such statements: "God is disorder", "all thought corrupts", "ideals are brutal things", "if you really loved your children there would be no wars" etc. M. Lutyens 1990 pp. 156-157.
  234. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1986 paragraphs 6-7. Retrieved 2010-10-26. In this quote, Krishnamurti refers to himself in both third and first person.
  235. ^ C. Jinarajadasa, a long time friend in India who eventually became president of the Theosophical Society, had pointed out to him in the 1930s that he (Krishnamurti) had "disciples" whether he wanted to or not. Williams 2004 p. 191. C. V. Williams adds, "that Krishnamurti was a guru with followers who disavowed other gurus who had followers was a charge that would be levelled against him for the rest of his life. Jinarayadasa [alt. spelling] realized the inescapability of the situation."
  236. ^ Vernon 2001 pp. 187, 261-262. Vernon calls such practices "worrisome". He cites some of the events organized in 1995 on the occasion of the centenary of Krishnamurti's birth, which included exhibits of memorabilia and personal items of his. He also comments on the "sanctimonious" atmosphere and "reverential ambience that characterizes gatherings of Krishnamurti enthusiasts [c. 2001]" which in his view "goes against the spirit of his life's work, surely to its future detriment." And he criticizes Foundation-sponsored conferences when their proceedings have in his opinion come close to interpretations of Krishnamurti's message.
  237. ^ M. Lutyens 1983 KFT, p. vii [in "Foreword"].
  238. ^ Vernon 2001 p. 245. The sometimes purposeful vagueness that Krishnamurti had invoked decades prior - when discussing the World Teacher issue - continued until the very end. In his last public talk, while speaking about meditation, and after asserting that "unfortunately" there is a "different kind of meditation", one unrelated to any idea or practice that the world normally associates with the term, he proceeded: "I mustn't describe it to you. I mustn't describe it because then you'll go off on descriptions. If I describe it, the description is not the real." From the Third Public Talk in Madras, 4 January 1986. J. Krishnamurti 1988 p. 150. (Context-based weblink: para. 816 retrieved 2010-06-24).
  239. ^ Vernon writes that scholars have analyzed Krishnamurti's philosophy relative to those of Li Er (Laozi), Siddhārtha Gautama, Jesus of Nazareth, and Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullāh, "with interesting results". Vernon 2001 p. 252. He does not offer any examples, considering them beyond the scope of his biography, though he writes of perceived similarities to Hindu and Theosophical philosophy, Vedanta, mainstream Buddhism, and Western Enlightenment rationalism. Philosophy professor Raymond Martin stated that "Krishnamurti's thought is quite removed from academic philosophy, particularly in the analytic tradition". Martin, Raymond (1997). "Editor's Preface". in J. Krishnamurti 1997 pp. viii-x. Instead he finds similarities with the Socratic method and also Siddhārtha Gautama's teachings, especially as it concerns the subject of choiceless awareness. Nevertheless he finds Krishnamurti's approach unique, adding, "His talks were, in effect, guided meditations." Martin, Raymond (1997). "Introduction". in J. Krishnamurti 1997 pp. xi-xix. (Context at p. xiii). [See also List of works about Jiddu Krishnamurti: Other representations. As of 15 December 2010 the majority of these listings included some measure of comparative analysis and interpretation of Krishnamurti and his teaching].
  240. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1956 para. 19. Retrieved 2010-09-30. Skitt, in J. Krishnamurti 2000 pp. xxii-xxiii [in Skitt's "Editor's Introduction"], includes this exchange and comments on the subject. Vernon writes, "Krishnamurti taught nothing new. This does not mean that he was unoriginal ... the essence of ... his Truth, was not to be contained in what is implied by terms like old, new, original or derivative... It was neither originality nor a logical system that Krishnamurti sought. His talks, instead, were intended to light a fuse,..." Vernon 2001 pp. 214-215.
  241. ^ "Time is the enemy of perception." J. Krishnamurti 1993 p. 30. From the entry of 15 March 1983. (Context-based weblink: para. 72 retrieved 2010-06-24). He often related immediate liberation with sudden, unforced - and thereby impersonal - attention to the present moment, attention that is "total" and "complete". According to Krishnamurti, this would be accompanied by a stoppage of the brain's "chatter". The brain would then be "completely quiet"; however, thanks to the completeness of its attention, it would simultaneously also be sharply poised and "awake". Krishnamurti held that such a brain would have "infinite space" and "potential" (he compared it to a frictionless, highly charged dynamo), as well as "tremendous energy". Further, that the genuine existence of such a state would immediately and irrevocably cause the collapse of the "petty", limiting, and limited, personality-based structures and modes of thinking that the human brain has evolved throughout its existence. It was Krishnamurti's contention that such "revolutionary" psychological transformation would be accompanied by similar physical changes on the cellular level [of the brain]. Additionally, he differentiated between personality-based thinking and impersonal applications of thought like the learning of a foreign language, or the mental effort required in the building of a bridge; such thinking he considered both obvious and necessary. The continuous application of this "insight" into liberation - that it may entail the harmonious coexistence of impersonal thought with the complete absence of all thought - is hindered by "absurd" attempts to consciously impose such harmony. Krishnamurti argued that all attempts by thought to capture any sudden, momentary glimpse of such insight prevent its continuation. Among other instances, see J. Krishnamurti 1970 for a more thorough exposition of the above and explicit "dynamo" reference in the context described here. For another example of comments on inward space see J. Krishnamurti 1983 paragraphs 10, 12-13, 24. Retrieved 2010-05-31. Comments on the obstacles to insight posed by thought at J. Krishnamurti 1972 paragraphs 20, 22-23. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
  242. ^ Such as the martial artist and performer Bruce Lee (Thomas 1994 p. 270), the writer Svetlana Peters (née Stalin, M. Lutyens 1988 JM, pp. 76-77), and the rock band Live, whose recording Mental Jewelry has many lyrical references to Krishnamurti's teachings. (Live 1991). For an account of spontaneous realization, see Frazier 2007 and related website (retrieved 2010-03-09). Frazier names J. Krishnamurti as one of her inspirations. Frazier 2007 pp. 183-184, 200 ["About the Author"].
  243. ^ Vernon states that such complaints surfaced with some regularity in his audiences' questions over a period of five decades. He adds that Krishnamurti often addressed these complaints, starting as far back as the 1920s, quoting him from 1928: "A surgeon who sees a disease that is eating up a man, says, in order to cure him I must operate. Another less experienced comes, feeds him and lulls him to sleep. Which would you call the more compassionate? You want comfort, that comfort which is born of decay." Vernon 2001 p. 173. Krishnamurti quote from J. Krishnamurti 1928 p. 12. [Note weblink in reference is not at official Krishnamurti website. Link-specific content verified against original. New York Public Library Main Branch. Record No: b15469516 retrieved 2010-12-15].
  244. ^ M. Lutyens 1990 p. 96. J. Krishnamurti 1955 para. 19 ("actually I am not telling you anything at all"), para. 20 ("If you ask how to be free, you are not listening") retrieved 2010-11-02. Buultjens 1996 p. viii. "Again and again Krishnamurti declared that people do not need guidance, they need awakening." I. Smith 1999 "[Chapter:] First Meeting" pp. 15-16. Krishnamurti associate Smith describes their first meeting and his experience of Krishnamurti as a "mirror".
  245. ^ M. Lutyens 1988 KFT, pp. 148-149; "Chapter 12: '...if they live the teachings' " pp. 148-154. Failing that, he often implored his audience to at least grasp the teaching intellectually.
  246. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1961 para. 21 (hard work). J. Krishnamurti 1989 para. 816 (no effort). Links retrieved 2010-10-21. J. Krishnamurti 2000 "[Chapter:] Asking but Not Answering Fundamental Questions" pp. 185-188. [Excerpts from various talks and writings]. "The very questioning opens the door through which you can find out, look, observe, and listen." [p. 188].
  247. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1929. "You are not serious in these things." J. Krishnamurti 1967 para. 326. "It demands a great seriousness". J. Krishnamurti 1979 para. 20. "It is rather fun sirs, and ladies, don't be so serious." Links retrieved 2010-10-20.
  248. ^ Krishnamurti responses in interviews: Montgomery 1982. Ingram 1983. He discussed possible reasons for the teachings' apparent failure to effect transformation in reply to an audience question in J. Krishnamurti 1974 paragraphs 27-28 [partial]. Retrieved 2010-09-30. See also J. Krishnamurti 2003 "Part Two: Why Don't We Change?" pp. 167-219.
  249. ^ J. Krishnamurti 1982 para. 323. Retrieved 2010-09-27. From the First Question & Answer Meeting at Brockwood Park, 2 September 1980. J. Krishnamurti 1929. "As an artist paints a picture because he takes delight in that painting, because it is his self-expression, his glory, his well-being, so I do this and not because I want anything from anyone."

References

Notes on references

  1. Listed alphabetically by author or creator. When information regarding authorship is unknown, unavailable, or inapplicable item is classified by title of work, in list order.
  2. Most references pointing to specific individual talks by Krishnamurti, and to some of his statements, are sublisted by date of delivery. The remainder, included in compilations, books, bulletins or other materials, are sublisted by publication or release date.
  3. Verbatim transcriptions of Krishnamurti's talks are indicated when such information is known.
  4. In cases of conflict among sources regarding the content, dates, locations etc. of Krishnamurti's writings, talks or discussions - and in the absence of other available verifiable information - Jiddu Krishnamurti Online (JKO, see below) has been used as the final authority whenever possible. Quotes attributed to Krishnamurti have been linked to or checked against JKO content when feasible. [As of 15 December 2010].
  5. The expression "JKO [text]." represents the document or webpage serial-number or id at Jiddu Krishnamurti Online.
  6. International Star Bulletin and Star Bulletin Volumes are not numbered in the original; for each relevant reference a bracketed [VolumeNumber] corresponding to publication year has been assigned.
  7. Same-entry imprints or editions separated by double semicolons (;;).

List of references

The following Foundations are listed by date of organization. Links retrieved 2010-03-09.

Template:Persondata