Jump to content

User talk:Kinu/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Kinu

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.2.210.243 (talk) at 20:07, 17 November 2012 (→Dai Ling Ping Deletion: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In the event of persistent vandalism, administrators are authorized to semiprotect this talk page for a reasonable duration to prevent further disruption.
Are you here because I deleted/reverted something you had contributed? Read me first, please!
More than likely, the reason you're here is because I deleted something you had contributed. Before writing here, why not see if you can answer your question yourself?
  • If your article was speedy deleted, please read the reason in the deletion log. Also note that, while I may have been the one to actually perform the deletion, another editor was likely the one who actually tagged it for deletion. If so, they left a message on your talk page, so please read the information there first. It might be a good idea to have a dialogue with them in lieu of with me.
  • If your article was about a band, please see WP:MUSIC. Wikipedia administrator User:Chrislk02 explains our speedy deletion of band articles in more depth here.
  • If your article was about a company you work for, founded, etc., please see WP:COI. Chances are your article looked like WP:SPAM. Take a moment to think about whether it could be considered advertising.
  • If your article was a joke... no thanks.
  • If I reverted content that I say was unsourced or poorly sourced, please see WP:RS. Verifiability is taken seriously around here.
If your question still isn't answered or your would like more clarification...
  • Post a new message at the bottom of my talk page. If you post it at the top, do something to break the formatting of this page, or replace everything on this page with your question, I will likely ignore and/or delete it. Common courtesy, please.
  • For a new topic, use a headline that's more descriptive than "my article". For best results, make the topic the title of the article. I deal with scores of articles a day, and I'm not going to go hunting for one.
  • Sign and date your entries using ~~~~ or the signature icon in the toolbar above the edit box.
  • Avoid comparisons and provide reliable sources for me to consider. Glib rants that compare your three-piece garage metalcore band to Metallica or that say your website is just as important as Google generally won't sway anyone.
  • Communication that is in ALL CAPS, is barely in English, lacks punctuation, is otherwise poorly worded or incoherent, contains profanity/personal attacks, or generally assumes bad faith will likely be reverted. I have no obligation to respond to anything that I feel does not benefit the project.
Thank you, and happy editing!
Are you here to ask me to perform an administrative action (a block, page protection, deletion, etc.)? Read me first, please!
  • If there is an issue that you feel requires or would benefit from my attention and administrative tools specifically, because we have communicated regarding it previously or you have other reasons to believe I might be the right person to deal with it, please feel free to create a section on my talk page!
  • However, for general requests for administrative actions, it is best to file a report at the proper venue (WP:AIV, WP:RFPP, WP:ANI, etc.) instead of pinging me specifically, for the reasons outlined below.
  • While it may appear that I am active based on my recent contributions, I do tend to jump from task to task here (and between here and the "real world") quite frequently. Thus, even though I may be actively performing administrative work during one short spell, I may not be during the next, instead focusing on another task (either on-wiki or in the "real world").
  • Likewise, if I have a high level of activity at a particular board and have actioned many reports, but not one that you have already filed there, it may be because I do not feel comfortable actioning it: I may not have a full understanding of the context and/or history or actually be involved with the editor/article in some way.
  • That being said, any information you provide with the good-faith intention of maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia, either here or to the relevant noticeboard, is appreciated! Rest assured that someone will act on it appropriately in due time.
Sockpuppets
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi. You just blocked Icepicked4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Icepicked5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as socks of Icepicked3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). All three of these are very obvious socks of serial vandal Runtshit, and I have retagged them accordingly. RolandR (talk) 10:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing this. I wasn't previously familiar with this case but it definitely appears to be the same troll. --Kinu t/c 09:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Thanks for looking into the User:Asd86d Sock-puppetry case.‎ GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 05:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Another one popped up today, and I'll keep an eye out for others. I'm hoping this troll gets bored soon and stops. --Kinu t/c 00:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Extreme incivility directed at you
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Your number one fan has some things to say. --Jprg1966 (talk) 20:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hello Kinu. I just wanted to let you know that Wickedangry (talk · contribs) has gone right back to the edit warring that you blocked them for last week. They have yet to make a post on an article talk page so it is tough to get through to them about consensus. I did inform them about that on my talk page but they seem to have ignored it. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 16:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

FYI, here's the warning I left about 20 minutes before you blocked this account: User talk:Wickedangry#Administrator's warning; I had declined to block this person at WP:AIV and left this warning.
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 18:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I felt a block was appropriate here in that the user was clearly aware of the issue here; it looks like McDoobAU93 had left a message indicating the issue (at 16:13), but this editor chose to ignore that and continue the edit war (at 16:19). To me, this smacks of bad faith or possible WP:CIR. I've left a caveat to the block notice on their talk page; if they can show they are willing to cease the edit war, I have no objections to an unblock. --Kinu t/c 18:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm fine with the subsequent message you left Wickedangry about unblocking -- let's see if he/she responds affirmatively. I hope they do; clearly they have passion but as you note competence and good faith are necessary, too. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
My thanks to you both in dealing with this editor. I have been off-wiki since I left my first post. There have been attempts to inform this person about our policies (here is my response to a post they made on my talk page from two days ago User talk:MarnetteD#pregnancies. Regretfully, this person just doesn't seem to be very responsive to any other editor. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 19:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I think you are being a little hasty blocking talk page access for this user. Possibly I am assuming too much good faith, but I just left him a message, edit conflicting with your decline. It seems to me that we need if possible to make progress by discussion, rather than just walk away. Rich Farmbrough, 02:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC).

And this would be helped if you restored his talk page access. Rich Farmbrough, 03:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC).
To be frank, I'm not going to do this. This user's behavior and block was discussed at length on his talk page and on Jimbo's talk page and was found to be legitimate. That being said, this user has several remedies at his disposal if he wishes to contest this block and contribute again. He may contact any of the administrators who imposed any of the blocks against his account, either on the basis of sockpuppetry or disruptive editing. He may contact the checkuser who performed the actual sockpuppet investigation. He may also contact ArbCom with a legitimate request to have this block reviewed. I would say that, of these remedies, the last is the most appropriate, because of what I consider the inappropriate repeated e-mails (including at what I consider a "work" address) and calls (yes, on the telephone) from this person; I do not feel that other editors should be subjected to that as well. This borderline harassment by this user is not earning any favor with me, considering I had nothing to do with this user's case other than preventing him from posting additional irrelevant unblock requests.
That being said, if you wish to engage with this user, I would ask that you contact one of the other aforementioned administrators involved in this matter; I have my reservations, but would not be unsupportive if another set of eyes felt compelled to restore his talk page access. However, I personally see no reason to do so, and instead recommend that he contact ArbCom. --Kinu t/c 16:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

There was a DRV on July 1st - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_July_1 which looks like it went for restore. Opinions varied between AfD it again and it's OK. Personally, I'd go for a delete at AfD. Mention is made of new sources, but no-one has bothered to add them - whatever they are... Peridon (talk) 20:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Ha... I thought the DRV that said it was from August was the most recent one, but that was from 2011. Obviously the July one from 2012 would be newer... . Anyway, I'm inclined to agree with you. I'll try to see what these alleged sources are and do some WP:BEFORE, and then if I'm not satisfied I might send it to AfD again. Thanks for letting me know. --Kinu t/c 17:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Socking in the free world, from Istanbul to Torrance, CA
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi, Kinu. Is this an open proxy[1]? -- Rrburke (talk) 16:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

It probably is, but I'm having trouble connecting to it myself. I've referred it to WP:OPP. --Kinu t/c 16:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Thanks. I've never done what I did before, and although I looked at the instructions, I didn't put the new template at the "very top", even though the phrase was italicized. I almost asked someone to look at it for me; I'm glad you did so without being asked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Regarding your comment at Talk:James T. Thompson and User talk:Ethanagray; I don't think the user was a vandal; he was a new user, not understanding our collaborative editing process and how it was applied to an article he'd just started. Given our difficulties with editor retention, please consider how we might differentiate between confused newbies (however frustrating their actions may be) and deliberate vandals, and how you can help the former to become productive editors. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Vandal block
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hello Kinu. Some time ago you blocked this IP for vandalism on several road signs article. The IP has since continued, and I must now ask you to block it permanently. It's a sock a Jermboy27 (as he is known on Commons). Fry1989 eh? 01:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

This one looks static, but I'm still hesitant to block IPs indefinitely. Nonetheless, I've gone ahead and taken this one out of commission for a year per WP:DUCK. --Kinu t/c 02:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, unfortunately Jermboy27 seems to have access to plenty of IPs and doesn't wanna go away. IDK what we can do besides a range block but I know people don't like the idea of that. Fry1989 eh? 17:41, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.
The Admin's Barnstar
For all of your great work at AIV today! Electric Catfish 16:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Well, that saved me the trouble of dragging him to ANI again. Cheers for doing the necessary. Yunshui 雲‍水 06:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Revoking talk page for spammer
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi there. A couple weeks ago you indeffed Aileen.abraham (talk · contribs). Today, that account spammed their talk page again. Is removing talk page access appropriate in these circumstances? Thanks. —Torchiest talkedits 20:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely. I've gone ahead and done so. Thanks. --Kinu t/c 17:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Since you were the original protecting/salting admin, just a heads up that it was re-created at Michael vincent mchugh. I only noticed the previous deletion when I tried to move it to the proper title. I've tagged it as a BLPPROD for now, but feel free to A7 it if you feel it meets that. Legoktm (talk) 09:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Done and salted. Thanks. --Kinu t/c 17:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

All I remember is that my "IP address" was caught by an open proxy block, as I stated here. It was set to expire on November 30 at 8pm EDT. I appreciate the quick help. Platinum Star (talk)

Not a problem... glad to be of assistance. --Kinu t/c 03:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
ORDER OF ISABELLA THE CATHOLIC
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I am in intrigue as to how confirm whether the information is true or not? Now I did received the ORDER OF ISABELLA THE CATHOLIC and wanted to be reflected on WIKIPEDIA, so what do I need to provide to UPDATE it correctly.

thanks

Milton G. Uribe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milt1074 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Reminder

Don't forget to log your blacklist addition. The log can be found here. If someone challenges a blacklisting in 6 or 12 months time any admin dealing with such a request must be able to find the reason for the listing. Cheers--Hu12 (talk) 04:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Ah, good call... I've gone ahead and done so. Thank you for the reminder. --Kinu t/c 04:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Great, thanks;)--Hu12 (talk) 04:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Would you mind if I...?

In this AfD: 1, you closed it by saying that it was "speedied". Would you mind if I changed it to "speedily deleted" so the AfD vote counter tool will be able to determine the result? Thanks--Go Phightins! 02:39, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
thanks jiku.miski 10:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
For your great work on speedy deleting today! Mediran talk|contribs 11:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

deletion of MaK(Verge Game Studio) and Verge Game Studio

I do not mean to seem unfriendly! Currently you deleted the two mentioned articles. In case or "Verge Game Studio" i can understand because of the speedy deletion and i read and understood your arguments, but i dont think that the article "MaK(Verge Game Studio)" meets with your argumentation! Both articles were under constuction and on Mak was a mark that i have seven days to edit more details. About the advertisement: I tried to make the two sides objective, so i generally took the two sides Mojang and Minecraft as templates and inserted information i could find over the company and the game. I also got the affirmation from Verge Game Studio that they would increase the information by quality and quantity.

If you recognize my argumentation why this sides didn't need to be deleted, is there a way to restore them of do a have to make them in my sandbox first?

thanks

P.S: New account, my old one "Bot91" also got deleted :( Bau912 (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


I have already made a new prototype of "VergeGameStudio" which will hopefully meet your taste too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bau912/VergeGameStudio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bau912 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

SolvedBau912 (talk) 15:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for removing that message from my page. That was the second time he'd done that and I'd already reported him to AIV. Thank you !  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  15:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the quick unblock. - Akamad (talk) 17:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your active help!

Thank you for your active help!
Hello. I appreciate your concern for actively taking part in the edits. But please try and understand that the professor who the page belongs to, he does not want his page up on Wikipedia in public. I made that page for him as a token of my appreciation for him on becoming the dean of the college I was studying in. Also, since I have left that college and transferred to a completely different country altogether, it is not possible for me to stay in touch with him and update his page. I have no idea whatsoever about his academic and professional commitments and by not updating his page, I feel it a guilt and injustice to him, myself and most of all, the readers of Wikipedia. I request you to please take the page off Wikipedia and delete it. Thank you! PhreakSoul (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Per deletion policy, because the subject appears to have some sort of notability, a deletion discussion must occur. If at the end of the deletion discussion there is consensus to delete based on policies and guidelines (or if there is no consensus and the subject provides an indication himself that he wishes to have the article deleted), then this would be the outcome. However, because the subject's article makes a claim of notability and there have been multiple editors working on the article, no one can unilaterally decide on deletion via speedy deletion. If you wish to pursue deletion further, please follow the process at WP:AFD. Thanks. --Kinu t/c 20:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Kings Island Facts

You deleted this sub page Kings Island Facts, This page is a subpage for Kings Island to contain lists of facts that do not belong on the main page for GA Staandard reasons. Please undo this.--Nickvet419 (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

I see you've recreated the fork article... it's been tagged for speedy again, but I'll leave it be. However, one could make the argument that if such content is relevant to the subject, then it belongs in the article in order to flesh it out for GA standards, but if it isn't, then it really doesn't belong anywhere. --Kinu t/c 03:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Joe Pulizzi page

Could you please help me better understand why the 2nd nomination for deletion is taking place for the wiki page for Joe Pulizzi? Any advice on what can be deleted from the content, added to it for substantive information, etc. would be tremendously helpful. Thank you so much, Kinu! Cmcphillips (talk) 03:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)cmcphillips

Serious bug!

Can you tell me what is the serious bug they are talking about? --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

I might have seen a topic with a similar title on WP:ANI but I'm not 100% sure. Do you recall where you read about this? I can investigate further. --Kinu t/c 05:40, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
I mean that one which was showing above articles/editbox/watchlist "Admins, do not delete pages, files. Serious bug. Page can not be restored". At the same time I saw you a deleting a page, so thought you have already got the news that it has been fixed! But, they told to wait for further notice. So, is it fixed? --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Turned out it's only on Commons. (see WP:AN). I put it in the notice to be safe, but turns out to be a false alarm. --Rschen7754 05:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Ah, hadn't seen that notice. Thanks for the info and the clarification. --Kinu t/c 06:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
No problem! Good to see you around USRD nowadays! --Rschen7754 06:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: GemSelect

Hello Kinu. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of GemSelect, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not that spammy and claims importance "largest suppliers of precious gems in the world". WP:CORP may not be met though, so it probably needs to go to WP:AFD. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the irrelevant OR/spam. I have sent the article to AfD as suggested. --Kinu t/c 17:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Phone

Sorry about that. In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy I had started checking wiki through my phone and may have unintentionally hit some buttons by mistake. Sorry about that. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying... I know all too well how much of a pain it can be to edit via phone. I also apologize if my tone sounded condescending... I was just perplexed. I hope things are getting back to normal after Sandy! --Kinu t/c 23:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Kalyanasundaram

It must be right to delete this page. So you would have done it. But can I get to see the contents of this page so I can try to wikify it? --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

The contents of the article were a copyright violation and thus should not be undeleted. --Kinu t/c 05:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Adamah

Hi. Could you possibly move Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Adamah over the current redirect? Sent to the incubators because I was ban-evading when I created it, but I've just been unbanned. --Claritas § 06:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Chris Jones (Network Engineer)

You deleted my page, with "Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject." as the reason. Is the author of a published book not sufficient importance? I understand that my page was incomplete - I have much more work to do on it. Can you please tell me how I can improve it so it will not be deleted again? Ipv6freely (talk) 08:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Page deletion

Please delete Ramalingam selvanathan as no one has deleted the page from past 2 hrs Thanks Sriharsh1234 09:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

It's already been deleted. I'm not certain why you asked me to do so personally, since I wasn't involved with the article in any way. --Kinu t/c 17:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

IP Block Exempt

The local IP block exempt worked great. Thank you! --Odie5533 (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

The Vision of Children Foundation

Hello, The article I am going to create was the title of a previously deleted article that represented SPAM or promotion. I will not be imitating the article that was previously deleted and my article will not contain any spam and follow all wikipedia policies. It notified me to perhaps talk to you since you deleted the original article.

Thank you, --Bianca 11-8-12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bianca Kof1234 Vision (talk • contribs) 18:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC) --Bianca Kof1234 Vision (talk) 18:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Seeing as how you have recreated the article, I have gone through and removed all of the obvious PR fluff. From your username, I am assuming you have a connection to the organization? --Kinu t/c 19:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Cyrus Habib

I created that page, but somebody told me it doesn't fit with the Wikipedia's notability standards, because he is still unelected. So, I asked for speedy deletion. Now, he has been elected. Would you please recover the created page, so I can edit it? Elecguy47 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

To be honest, the article as written contained almost zero useful content, except for a link to this source. I am hesitant to restore an article that does not show why the subject is notable and cannot be salvaged; however, you are certainly more than welcome to create a new sourced article on the subject. --Kinu t/c 21:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Jiggy thakor

Hi Kinu.Please visit on this page and tell me how can i remove this tag from my image : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jigar_no_jung.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiggythakor (talk • contribs) 03:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean, but because the image is corrupt, it's been deleted per WP:CSD#F2. --Kinu t/c 03:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Can you explain why the Dai ling ping wiki was deleted

I found the post to be quite valid , informative , and within context based around the welsh comedian and actor.Thank you for your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.228.61 (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Dai Ling Ping Deletion

can you explain why the Dai Ling Ping Wiki was deleted. i have read over various comments that the character is not notable and also that a google search resulted in minimal hits. a recent search has given me 7,120,000 results. although Dai Ling Ping is a fictional character created by Mr LBX Media by the actor and comedian Mr LBX. we feel that the character is almost definately notable and somewhat a well known celebrity in wales.also an in depth search will also reveal that Mr LBX has one of the fastest growing brands in the uk today.thankyou for your time

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kinu/Archive_12&oldid=523546075"