User talk:RHaworth/2015 Feb 11

Ten Years

On 2015 Jan 1, I joined the Wikipedia Ten Year Society.
Will I make it for another ten?

Archives

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

Criticism of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

I created this article and was tagged for speedy deletion because there was another article of the same name which was deleted because of lacking sources or other issues before I joined wikipedia but my article has reliable sources. Can you check the matter. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 10:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

• Quite simply, we do not allow content forks. Text moved to User:Owais Khursheed/Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Discuss proposed changes at talk:Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Incidentally, I shall be reviewing your large number of user pages to see to what extent you are using Wikipedia as a free host. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 10:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Androphobia

Hi, What happened with the Androphobia AfD? As I posted on the requests for move page, I nominated it. Twinkle created it as 2nd nomination. I saw "2 nomination" already existed and thus my nomination was the third. I moved the "2nd" I just created to "3rd" and requested "2" be moved to "2nd" for naming purposes. Now it looks like you've deleted the original second nomination and moved the third into its place? It's all quite confusing, of course, so I may be misunderstanding what you did. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

• I blame it all on Philg88 (talk · contribs) for doing this move to the Wikipedia:Wikipedia: namespace. Please check that all is now as you like it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Looks good. Just went through and changed the delsort links again and I think all is in order. Thanks. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

• Mea culpa - I should have checked the namespace. Sorry guys.  Philg88 ^♦talk 22:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Sara Goldrick-Rab

Hi, I would like to request a reduction in the protection level for Sara Goldrick-Rab. A draft of the proposed new article is available at Draft:Sara Goldrick-Rab. While she did not meet notability guidelines in the past, I believe she does now according to the guidelines and "Average Professor Test" suggested here, given her influence on President Obama's free community college proposal. I hope that my draft has demonstrated this notability, though I'm happy to include more (and different) types of sources to show her influence within higher education more clearly. Additionally, if you have any additional suggestions for the article, I would appreciate your feedback. This article is my first, so I'm sure your comments would be helpful. Thank you for your time. Have a great day! OkfochushTikabi (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

• Somewhat premature. Come back when the draft has actually been accepted. Which of your references pass the "links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" test? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

BTouz14458

Hello, I just want to let you know this user is keep on creating non-notable just spammy article on different football season's, events etc you deleted like this and this. Recently one more article is created 2014-15 FBL Season. — A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 19:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

• Blocked. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Erik Winquist

Okay well Erik Winquist is a Oscar nominee so not sure why he is up for a speedy. I have some refs and stuff, but yeah its odd. Wgolf (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

• The speedy tag clearly states: do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. Have you actually provided links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Yeah there is the Oscar page-I feel bad I removed it-sorry about that. Anyway thanks for that notice and everything. Wgolf (talk) 01:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) RHaworth, I've already raked Wgolf over the coals for removing the tag. He has provided reliable sources in support of the nom, so I've declined the speedy.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Do you remember the story with this IP editor?

I see you deleted Agaton Sax and the Byköpings Village Festival in 2013. I recall that there is a disruptive Swedish-based IP editor with a thing for these animated children's films and a tendency to create articles on them and associated actors in talk space, but I don't remember whether he/she is banned or what. 192.36.199.130 is currently active and has recreated Talk:Agaton Sax och Byköpings gästabud (film), which you deleted in November 2014, and which has just been redeleted. Clearly the same person or group; do you recall whether it's a revert on sight or an expect bad edits but judge on the merits case? Yngvadottir (talk) 12:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

They have successfully created a couple of new articles via others moving them out of talk space into article space. Of these Krakel Spektakel is seriously problematic. The Swedish is coherent and depending on the editor's status, I'll either expand it and try to demonstrate notability or pursue deletion. I'm going to leave a note on the editor's talk page about unexplained blanking, removal of maintenance templates, and bad English, again in case the user is not banned. Yngvadottir (talk) 13:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

• If 192.36.199.133 (talk) is currently globally blocked, then 192.36.199.130 should be blocked as well so I have done that. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Ah ok, thanks, that means it is some sort of ban, I'll revert less fastidiously next time. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Later Sui Empire

Later Sui Empire (dominating usurp during 1418-1644). The article is new build version which I do develop and different form former similiar version of it. This version is not mangled, not vandal and not Hoax. Because, the article uses authentic text and legal books as listed at the article references section. The chinese used there can be read at online ctext.org which legally title of document. Why do the deletion? Please restore and undelete the page if you can? — ADHZ07111989 (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

• I can see very little difference in the references between your latest version and the version deleted following the MfD discussion. But feel free to try again at Draft:Later Sui Empire. If you need a copy of your deleted text, read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

The Knowledge Centre for Agriculture Deletion

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Institute of Polymaths

Hello, it is not clear why the educational page Institute of Polymaths was deleted from Wikipedia? Can you clarify your criteria. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.49.47.146 (talk) 00:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

The Institute of Polymaths is a valid educational page, your criteria for deletion do not seem just, please can you retract it. Kindest regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:630:12:2E1B:A839:B005:E248:4EB1 (talk) 16:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:31, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Apologies, I am new to this. I have now created an account. Hope this helps with my query. The Institute of Polymaths is a valid educational page, I believe its deletion is therefore unfair and was hoping that it could be re-instated. Kind regards, Cluelessit (talk) 21:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

• Hutan, why create a new account? Why cannot you use the Wikiknowledgesource (talk · contribs) account with which you created the article? I could also have deleted your page as a copyvio from your website. When I looked at that website, I thought "this is some school kid creating a test site, probably using a standard GoDaddy template - it is virtually empty". I was amazed to discover that you are a lecturer at a reasonably respectable university. As I asked, using the website's contact form - to which you have not responded - in what respect does this institute actually exist: does it have any activities; does it publish anything? And even if does either of these things it will not qualify for a Wikipedia article until reliable sources have noticed it. What sort of stuff is on the other 172 domain names that you have registered? I shall expect a reply to each of my questions. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Mark Anthony (psychic)

RHaworth, I am trying to identify and remove the offending material from the deleted page, and could find no trace of the deleted page. I have attempted to recreate the content without infringing information, but the new submission is denied for having the same title as the deleted page. Would it be easiest to resubmit under a new title?

08:54, 26 September 2014 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Anthony the “Psychic Lawyer,” (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Mark-Gager/37933663)

Thank you for any assistance you can provide. eWareTroy — Preceding unsigned comment added by EwareTroy (talk • contribs) 18:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

• "The new submission is denied …" - what are you talking about - neither the horrible title you used nor the preferred title of Mark Anthony (psychic) is protected. But kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks the guy is notable and writes about him here. Instead, go and tidy up the zoominfo page where the same info has been zoomed in triplicate. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Bern T Ito back

Ben T Ito is back, reusing his User:Canyouhearmeknocking41579 account. I've started an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Copernicus1234. — Meters (talk) 00:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

• I say that for a blatant case like this we don't need an SPI. But well done for creating a detailed one. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Morning Sign Out

Hello Sir! I am the one who write the article for the Morning Sign Out. I understand that the article leaned more towards promotion than being encyclopedic and I will edit my text to reflect so. I would like to request a chance to rectify my mistake, also any suggestions you may have so that such problems do not arise again would be most appreciated! Thank you for the opportunity! Amitsandhu360 (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Amitsandhu360

• I note that you are lead editor staff. Preventing such problems arising again is very simple: sign out of Wikipedia and stay signed out. When your website becomes notable, someone with no COI will write about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Republican Centre for Technology Transfer

Hello. You have deleted the article Republican Centre for Technology Transfer because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. But permission to use thisdocument has been granted. Copyrighted information was copied from this source.

Permission is stored in the archives of OTRS. Its identification number 2013071910002523. It's my fault, that I forgot to point out the source of the article. Please, retrieve that article. Yours sincerely, MaksPR94 11:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

• You have submitted an OTRS ticket re the page at ictt.by but have you submitted one in respect of http://co2olbricks.syncope.de/?id=79 which is the copyvio source involved in the latest deletion? More importantly, despite many links I am dubious about whether notability was established. But feel free to re-submit preferably entirely in your own words so there can be no copyvio issues. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

A Better Fort and BAALS Music Festival

Hello I included the links to both pages below so you can easily reference the deleted pages. I helped write the pages for an event and an organization in Fort Wayne, Indiana. I now understand the reason for deletion. Great lesson here! I will need to assure that I paraphrase correctly when using references to obtain information.

Do I have to rewrite both of these pages from scratch? Or am I able to have the page reinstated as a draft so I can rewrite areas that were not paraphrased correctly which inherently caused a copyright violation. I'll then resubmit. Draft:BAALS Music Festival and Draft:A Better Fort. — Liilbuck (talk) 16:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

• Using naked URLs instead of wikilinks suggests to me someone who is here with intentions different from building an encyclopedia. Perhaps you can start by explaining the connection between yourself and Abffw (talk · contribs), Nyzzy Nyce (talk · contribs) and Snajamahmed (talk · contribs). I find it difficult to believe that these accounts are being operated by four different people. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Certainly, there is a direct connection between these users. I know all of them personally, they are 4 of 17 individuals in our club (including myself). A group of us started this club several years back called the NE INDIANA WIK-a-NONS. We meet semi-monthly via Google Hangouts and quarterly at a pub to discuss articles, self-teach and share tips for writing on Wikipedia. Our focus is on notable persons, places and things from Northeast Indiana.

I see your comments on "naked URLs" instead of Wikilinks. I did a bit of research and I look forward to taking this info back to the group! Quick question though... correct me if I'm wrong. I read here (http://www.wordstream.com/naked-link) that a naked link is a hyperlink for which the anchor text is the URL itself, so called because the URL is fully visible to readers. If this is what you mean by naked URL what do you recommend we use instead of this? I may have naked URL mistaken in terms of what it means with Wikipedia. Lastly, and in reference to my first post here...Do I have to rewrite both of these pages from scratch? Or am I able to have the page reinstated as a draft so I can rewrite areas per your recommendations and help, then resubmit? — Liilbuck (talk) 04:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

• OK, explanation of multiple accounts accepted. I cannot restore the pages because they would be copyvios but I can email them - read this. As to links, you and your mates in the pub definitely need to do some homework on some very basic aspects of wiki markup. To understand what follows you need to look at the markup of this message. The wordstream link you give above is exactly what I mean by a naked URL. It would have been better written as this page. (It is also something of an insult to Wikipedia since you could have found the same info at bare URLs.) For links to Wikipedia pages: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:A_Better_Fort was trebly wrong - it is naked, it is in external format and it includes m. A Better Fort is still wrong for being external. Draft:A Better Fort is fine and this link is even better. The main reason I insist on wikilinks is that they go into the database: Special:WhatLinksHere/Draft:A Better Fort tells us that the draft has been discussed here. It would not have reported it if I had left your link in external format. (And we very rarely need <br/> in wikimarkup!) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

This is great information! Indeed, I think we need to focus in on wiki markup and I'll be bringing this Wikipedia article I found to the next meeting for review. I see what you mean about wikilinks going into the database. Understood about not being able to restore the pages because they would be copyvios. I followed the instructions so that you can email the copy and we can get started on re-writing using your recommendations and others that we pick up reading up on wiki markup. Please email a copy of the deleted articles for Draft:A Better Fort and Draft:BAALS Music Festival — Liilbuck (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of World Flag

I was the user who tagged the page World Flag for speedy deletion based on WP:G4. Only now the page creator is contesting the deletion at Talk:World Flag. -- Joshua ^{Say "hi" to me!}_{What I've done?} 17:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

• So what? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I wanted to ask what shall we do about it in this case. Now given that the talk page has been deleted, I guess it was okay to tag the talk page with speedy delete G8 then. Thanks. --Joshua ^{Say "hi" to me!}_{What I've done?} 03:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

• Talk pages without matching article pages are not allowed. There are other places where the deletion should be protested. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of user:inetbiz

I'm quite baffled what was self-promotional about my user page? I linked to where I work. You link to your blog. What's the difference? I'd like to have my user page back. I regularly contribute donations to wikipedia. I am not using to as a hosted promotional page. It's there to merely express who I am and about me so that others who collaborate with me on a given topic understand my point of view. -- Inetbiz (talk) 03:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

• User pages are meant only for active editors and it is difficult to count you as one. They are also intended for an editor to talk about what they do on Wikipedia. Yours was pure social networking so it got zapped. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:31, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Universal Basketball Alliance

Avinash UBA (t c) yesterday created

• UBA India
• Universal Basketball Alliance
• Universal Basketball Alliance (UBA)

Robart111 (t c) today does something similar. -- Sam ^Sing! 09:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

• I just want to put information about Universal Basketball Alliance. Why im gettig deleting I really don't know. I am not putting any link, not using any bad language then why such thing happens. The Universal Basketball Alliance is the biggest basketball tournament happens in India. I just want to submit the information, and always getting deleted I don't know where I'm lacking. Please help, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robart111 (talk • contribs) 09:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

• Not putting any link is one of the reasons why it is getting deleted! We need links to independent reliable sources. Also, we need to see you actually creating a Wikipedia article instead of dumping a load of unformatted text. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Margot & the Nuclear So and So's

Hi RHaworth, I noticed that you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margot & the Nuclear So and So's as speedy delete. Did you mean to delete Margot & the Nuclear So and So's as well? This page is still available and the AfD tag is still on the page. I have no stake in this page, but was just wondering about the closure. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:51, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

• Please read the logs and histories: when did I delete the article? Was it two minutes before I closed the AfD? When was the current version created? Note that it is subject to an AfD (2nd nomination). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Ohhh, sorry about that. Thanks for the clarification. Natg 19 (talk) 01:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

conpliant

	conpliant
	Today I was koronated as the king of Redonda so it is not false information. — Seapotato (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Recent close of AFD

Hi, about an hour ago you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cause and Effect of Heavy Metals (Biology) as a speedy delete because the user requested deletion. I just wanted to let you know he has now pasted the same text at User:CHUI Wai Cho Virgil‎. I did the PROD and AFD nominations, so I don't want to be seen to be "hounding" any more. So I'm letting you know. Thanks, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 12:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

And again?

And again? On my userpage? Seriously, what the fuck? darwinbish ^BITE ☠ 18:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC).

You think I vandalise my own userpage, huh? But just the category, that don't matter. I was gonna remove it myself anyway, because dumb Jehochman had added a "humour template" to it. Humour! Bah! But when I got a second alert that "your edit on User:Darwinbish has been reverted by RHaworth," I thought it was a mere crazed repetition of your first revert. Hrrm. OK, never mind. I suppose. darwinbish ^BITE ☠ 19:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC).

Thank you

For expeditious deletion of untouchable. — NE Ent 22:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Same, - touched by that -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

• I have never touched the untouchable page. If you are talking about category:untouchable editors, why don't you say so? I am surprised you even noticed it - has it been discussed on some IRC channel or similar? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

John A. Chapman, journalist

Hi! Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you deleted a page John A. Chapman, journalist as a G12 although it was marked with {{OTRS pending}} on the talk page. The author of the article is actually the copyright holder of the source material as he explained here: User_talk:Steven_Paul_Fisher#Colorado_poetry_fellowship. He says that he sent the permission to the OTRS team, which User Mike V confirmed here: User_talk:Mike_V#User_talk:Steven_Paul_Fisher.23Colorado_poetry_fellowship. So, the article is actually not a copyright violation. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, you actually deleted many more of his articles. Although those articles are of very poor quality, I'm sure those are not copyright violations. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

• Not exactly a great waste of effort. If creation of each page took more than a minute, I should be very surprised. I have explained my attitude here on the offender's talk page. I am also rather concerned at his unwillingness to discuss his work. A block has had some effect - we shall see what happens. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Pal Joey

Hello Could you please go to to my website and then you can see that I am honest. It would be nice to have a page. It is very complicated, wished I had someone sitting next to me helping me. Please help, thank you, Joseph Longo, Pal Joey Music — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pal Joey Music (talk • contribs)

• No-one is questioning your honesty. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Ronald Appleton

Hello, I am saddened to see that an article I had submitted has been seen to contain copyright infringement material. The article took me several weeks of difficult research and I resorted to asking a colleague to help with a couple of cases. I have no idea how this could have happened and after reading a lot of the wikipedia guidelines I have no idea what I can do about any of this. I do not even have a copy of the draft because I had to reformat my computer over the holidays so I can't even compare the copyrighted material with the draft.

From here, what am I allowed to do? Ideally I'd like to ask for my article back so I can delete anything not written by myself and make any other changes necessary. I would feel terrible if all my work would have been utterly wasted. I'm sorry if you are not the right person to ask about this, I am not the most technologically savvy and feel a little helpless. "Reference: 17:43, 30 January 2015 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Ronald Appleton (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.independent.co.uk/news/no-defence-in-ira-bomb-trial-1567616.html)" <Ugly naked link deleted.> (I'm sorry if this is not the perfect format, I'm not 100% what it was, but this is how I access it). If you could offer me any advice I would be greatly appreciative. Kind regards, Samirsoormally (talk) 14:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

• Definitely not the perfect format - Draft:Ronald Appleton is much prettier. Rather a long winded way of saying "please email me the text". So read this. One section of your article was an unambiguous copyright infringement of the source cited above. Another section was a copyvio from YouTube. How much more was copyvio? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

I followed your instructions and my email is confirmed now. After taking a look at the article I will be deleting both paragraphs not written and cited by myself. Everything left will be newspaper articles and 2 well cited books. This is my mistake for not checking before submission and I hope I have a chance to rectify it. Thank you for your help. — Samirsoormally (talk) 13:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

• Text emailed. "Everything left will be newspaper articles and 2 well cited books" - these must also be deleted - copying newspaper articles and books is just as much a copyvio as copying from websites. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Cheyenne Mountain (Colorado landform)

Hi RHaworth, I've been working on cleaning up a number of Colorado articles by an ambitious editor, but misguided editor. Cheyenne Mountain massif and Cheyenne Mountain (Colorado landform) should really be Cheyenne Mountain. I think Cheyenne Mountain landform was created first, and then renamed to Cheyenne Mountain massif... and I've inserted the direct links into articles and removed "distinguish" statements that didn't really apply in a few cases.

Cheyenne Mountain, from my experience is called Cheyenne Mountain. It seems non-sensical to have a redirect with the mountain name + landform in the title. Is it just me? Right now, the only page that links to Cheyenne Mountain (Colorado landform) is the user's page. Can I tag it for speedy deletion now? Thanks much! -- CaroleHenson (talk) 17:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

• The speedy deletion rules for redirects include a "recently created" clause. Cheyenne Mountain (Colorado landform) is not deletable because of that clause. More importantly it is currently receiving quite heavy incoming traffic. I suspect that this will fall off sharply now that you have fixed the incoming links. If the traffic drops to a low level, come back to me in three months time and I will be willing to ignore the recently created clause and delete it because it is such an implausible title.

Cheyenne, Colorado on the other hand, looks a very likely title, has some useful looking content, is not recently created and has some incoming traffic. For this one, if you really want to delete go to RfD. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the "recently created" clarification. The incoming traffic is likely at least partially due to a posting that I made on the Talk:Colorado Springs, Colorado talk page.--CaroleHenson (talk) 20:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Vocademy

I am trying to understand why this was marked for speedy deletion. All content was factual and cited from respected and well distributed 3rd party sources. The page format was modeled after existing topics of a similar subject. I am trying to understand more specifically what should have been added to or removed from the page to avoid deletion so I don't waste hours of my time in the future creating pages that will be just summarily deleted without comment. Thanks. JennaSys (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

• Deletion as spam was possibly a bit harsh but your contributions history suggests COI so the best I can offer is that you take it to deletion review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

That helps a bit - thanks JennaSys (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

user:Davidbritton63

Hi RHaworth, why do you think this user qualifies for autopatrolled and filemover flags? They have never created and article or contributed a file. Most new users benefit from having patrollers go by their articles. — xaosflux ^Talk 19:30, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

• I find the host of different rights a bit confusing. He was sitting beside me at the time I applied those permissions and he seems an OK guy. All I wanted to do was to enable him to move his sandbox into mainspace as soon as he wants. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Ah OK, that's confirmed lets them skip the 4 day wait...there are a LOT of them these days, and the master list Special:ListGroupRights is even harder to read! Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 20:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Marshawn Lynch

Could you protect Marshawn Lynch? -- Sam ^Sing! 00:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Re: Steven Paul Fisher

Hi there, I've noticed recently you've deleted a couple of articles created by Steven Paul Fisher (talk · contribs). I just wanted to let you know that text obtained through the Denver University digital library has been released under cc-by-sa 3.0 and GDFL through OTRS. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, Mike V • Talk 01:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

• The copyright position is easily solved. Much more problematical is the guy's slovenly way of simply dumping text with zero attempt to create a Wikipedia article. Three people have moaned at him about it. We wait to see if he gets the message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Possible stub articles

Hi, on behalf of User:Hvanwy1, I would like to request that you recover and userfy possible stub articles (which would be a less BITEY action, considering the page creator is a new user looking for stubs to edit. Thanks! Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 02:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

• The offending page was just 11 bytes long and has already been userfied by Hvanwy1. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Spammy User

Hi! I'm a reviewer on Hindi Wikipedia. Since past two months we have a WP:SPAMMER user who creates many accounts and upload his own images and write articles about his village, Jāti, etc. He also use his user pages as personal blog for promotion. I also notice that this user was also active on this Wikipedia... User:Raju Sutharr who got blocked for copyright violations. This user's socks User:Raju Suthar (carpenter), User:Tejaram Thadiya and User:Teju Suthar got blocked by you. I just want to say that this user also got User:Rajuthadiya. See this Checkuser report. Humorously User:Rajuram Suthar Thadiya got blocked for being sock of this account but not this. This user is not giving up, now he has created User:राजुराम सुथार ठाडिया, User:राजू सुथार (लेखक) and also User:राजु सुथार (Except from the last one, he only makes edits on Hindi Wikipedia). We have blocked all of his accounts except User:राजु सुथार. This user is indulges in self-promotion, just see his (deleted) user pages. I would also like to point out his uploading of images - File:Raju-suthar-thadiya.png, File:Tejusuthar.jpg, File:Rajuji.jpeg. This images should be deleted.--Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 12:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks, will do. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of RINA

Hi, you recently marked https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Recursive_InterNetwork_Architecture_%28RINA%29 for speedy deletion, and it has indeed been deleted. I would ask that the article be at least temporarily recovered, as there was significant time and energy spent in crafting it, and there are not any other copies. It was suggested that there were G11 and G12 problems, however, since the article is now completely gone, I have no way of even attempting to resolve the issues, other than starting over completely from scratch. The G11 problem could have been addressed by editing the article, and G12 could have been solved by letting the original submitter of the article, User_talk:Edugrasa, who is also the copyright holder, to formally grant access, as was his intent. I ask as a bystander of the whole situation, who has been in contact with the original submitters, and was originally curious about creating an article for the topic, myself. --Cowmoose21 (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC) the

HELP! Speedy deletion nomination - File:Avey TheAffair chair.jpg

Hello! My son's image was deleted from his wikipedia page. My son has full use rights in his SAG contract for self publicity, including logo and publicity stills from the show. Please let me know how to get this image back up. I can have his agent forward the contract if requested for proof. Thank you! Ethan Noble

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nobleeth#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:Avey_TheAffair_chair.jpg