Jump to content

User talk:Uhooep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Huon (talk | contribs) at 20:45, 18 March 2018 (unblock request accepted). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Uhooep, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 08:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ardingly College

Hi Uhooep!

I have noticed that you have been removing the content I have added to the page. I think we ought to try and stick to the "public school" structure of a Wiki article. Things such as how expensive in terms of HMC the school is, and the fact that there is a prep school within the college, have to be thoroughly explained. I recommend we keep the current edit.

Warm regards, --CreiterAdam45z (talk) 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FLC nom

Hi, Well done for working on my comments about the List of University of East Anglia alumni, however it is normal practice to leave the strikethrough to the person who has made the comment to decide if the issue has been resolved.— Rod talk 16:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 17 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Wangdi Norbu) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Wangdi Norbu, Uhooep!

Wikipedia editor Human3015 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

If sources found add his birth date.

To reply, leave a comment on Human3015's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milford, Surrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harlequins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Pburka. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mira Sethi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reference cited doesn't mention that school. Please provide reliable sources for all information, especially about living people. Pburka (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (James Lupton) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating James Lupton, Uhooep!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please expand otherwise it just looks like a 'who's who' entry

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Lupton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London Capital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

King's College London page (10 and 11 November 2015)

The audit trail of the relevant edit history have been highlighted below:

(cur | prev) 19:24, 11 November 2015‎ Uhooep (talk | contribs)‎ . . (141,928 bytes) (-29)‎ . . (cur | prev) 19:23, 11 November 2015‎ Uhooep (talk | contribs)‎ . . (141,957 bytes) (-93)‎ . . (NATO not a state or government) (cur | prev) 18:29, 11 November 2015‎ Uhooep (talk | contribs)‎ . . (142,050 bytes) (-324)‎ . . (10) (cur | prev) 16:06, 11 November 2015‎ 159.92.233.74 (talk)‎ . . (142,374 bytes) (+3)‎ . . (→‎Heads of state, government and international organisations) (cur | prev) 16:05, 11 November 2015‎ 159.92.233.74 (talk)‎ . . (142,371 bytes) (+119)‎ . . (→‎Heads of state and government: Chairman NATO Petr Pavel) (cur | prev) 12:44, 11 November 2015‎ 159.92.233.74 (talk)‎ . . (142,252 bytes) (+324)‎ . . (Undid revision 690121254 by Uhooep (talk) Let's limit to 13.) (cur | prev) 12:31, 11 November 2015‎ Uhooep (talk | contribs)‎ . . (141,928 bytes) (-324)‎ . . (→‎Notable alumni: let's limit this to 10? otherwise we could have countless thumbs) (cur | prev) 12:11, 11 November 2015‎ 159.92.233.74 (talk)‎ . . (142,252 bytes) (+106)‎ . . (→‎Notable alumni: inserted Dame 'Cicely Saunders') (cur | prev) 11:42, 11 November 2015‎ 159.92.233.74 (talk)‎ . . (142,146 bytes) (+101)‎ . . (→‎Notable people: Katherine Grainger, four-time Olympic medallist) (cur | prev) 11:31, 11 November 2015‎ 159.92.233.74 (talk)‎ . . (142,045 bytes) (-6)‎ . . (→‎Notable alumni) (cur | prev) 11:24, 11 November 2015‎ 159.92.233.74 (talk)‎ . . (142,051 bytes) (+123)‎ . . (Undid revision 689984290 by Uhooep (talk)) (cur | prev) 16:20, 10 November 2015‎ Uhooep (talk | contribs)‎ . . (141,928 bytes) (-117)‎ . . (→‎Notable alumni) (cur | prev) 12:45, 10 November 2015‎ 159.92.232.215 (talk)‎ . . (142,045 bytes) (+117)‎ . . (→‎Notable alumni: Michael Houghton, Hepa C discoverer)

In terms of your most recent edits, please see replies below: - Whilst NATO may not be a state or government, you have intently deleted the phrase 'or international organisations' from the table's title: - Limiting to 10 by number alone is not helpful. The three 'notable' alumni have not been been inserted within reason and does not constitute 'countless' as you put it. Outstanding merit and diversity of gender and ethnic origin have been fully considered for the alumni gallery.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. In the spirit of the essence of Wikipedia, you are disrupting and hampering the privilege rights of the community. Your edits appear to constitute WP:Vandalism and WP:WikiBullying -- these have therefore been reverted or removed. Repeated unconstructive edits can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.232.249 (talk) 12:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Wigston

Hi - Thank you for your edits to Michael Wigston. Unfortunately the material was unsourced and therefore has been immediately removed per WP:BLP. Please feel free to re-insert but please provide citations. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 17:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please can you add a citation to Richard Nugee as well please. Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaning

So again you move the images in the King's alumni section to cause an orphaned block of text between two image, without any discussion or mention in your edit summary. Please, I try and be civil and discuss but to have someone come along an revert willy nilly is a bit infuriating. I'm happy to disagree on Alain de Botton but I don't see the benefit of such a low quality image. Aloneinthewild (talk) 23:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Judges

You can use {{Db-g7}} on any that haven't had significant edits from other users. Peter James (talk) 21:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hilal Al Sarmi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hilal Al Sarmi, Uhooep!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for writing this short but intersesting article about an interesting politician.

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Kurten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PGCE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

I had no idea what I was doing - sorry. Clare. (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :) I'll try and add proper references to all my changes. My source is Cambridge University directories of members. Regards Uhooep (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karl Landsteiner Memorial Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Morgan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nick Barton
added links pointing to Zoological Society and Leopoldina
Erwin Schrödinger Prize
added a link pointing to Michael Wagner

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Uhooep. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Olney

Have you got a reference that she went to KCL? Or it will be deleted, Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 03:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I;ve removed it for now. That reference didn't really back up the details, nor is it clear that it actually was her. Please find a better reference. If you wait, there might be a proper biography of her published which confirms that. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 03:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Found another reference. Also her LinkedIn profile backs this up. Uhooep (talk) 03:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Googling "Sarah Olney Distilled Limited" brings up two linkdin profiles. Are they the same Sarah Olney? I don't have a linkdin account so I can't check, Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 03:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
She's listed under her current occupation "Assistant Finance Manager at National Physical Laboratory" Uhooep (talk) 03:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Does it say she worked at Distilled Limited before? Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 04:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Chief Financial Officer, Distilled Ltd, June 2008 – March 2014 Uhooep (talk) 04:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this. There have been a few biographies of her published today that confirm it too. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 17:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Gardiner (footballer, born 1911), without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 08:21, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Peter Leaver

Hi, I'm DrStrauss. Uhooep, thanks for creating Peter Leaver!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, I've reviewed your page. As it's a BLP, it could do with more references and a bit of expansion to ensure it passes WP:GNG. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

DrStrauss talk 12:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

George Chapple Norton as a distinguished Old Wykehamist

Hi, I see you've added a stub for this person, and immediately put him into the list. Apart from the (not very remarkable) fact that he became an MP (easy at the time for people of his class), why should he be there? He has very little claim to fame and doesn't seem to have distinguished himself as an MP, either. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added him because there is no mention on the list that it is reserved for 'exceptionally notable' Old Wykehamists who go beyond Wikipedia's standard notability guidelines. My view has always been that if the subject is notable enough to warrant an article then they are notable enough to be added to stand alone alumni lists. Uhooep (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That would require the list to include every OW who has an entry, which is utterly unreasonable. We don't require exceptional notability, just that they did enough to make them worth listing, which frankly Norton didn't. That might mean his page should be deleted, or it might not, but he really isn't of any interest for the list. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Nelson, 6th Earl Nelson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability within bio (more specificallly: application of wp:GNG/wp:BIO against wp:AUTH/wp:PROF...and both vis-a-vis vagaries of actual practice!

I.e. - Is Matthew Grow, editor of The Council of Fifty, Minutes, March 1844–January 1846 (The Church Historian's Press, which is an imprint of Deseret Book; 2016), notable? Is Benjamin E. Park, who reviews him here: "The Mormon Council of Fifty: What Joseph Smith’s Secret Records Reveal" (Religion & Politics, September 9, 2016)? Please chime in on a way to determine such questions in a much more consistent manner than at present...here: User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Suggested_fix.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Franke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Lawther

You have added Alex Lawther to the list of Kings College alumni. The article on him makes no mention of attending Kings, the only relevant ref says that he had a place at Kings but there is no mention of him ever attending. Do you have a reference to demonstrate his attendance ? Without a ref I will have to delete the entry on the list. Regards  Velella  Velella Talk   23:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Barry Ife) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Barry Ife, Uhooep!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add an image. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 00:51, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Uhooep. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yutaka Tokiwa

Hello, Uhooep. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Yutaka Tokiwa, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Yutaka Tokiwa to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Sadads (talk) 15:56, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Widefox; talk 21:16, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promo articles

Hi again, well I came across your name again at the AfD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Crypto_Valley. Crypto_Valley has WP:SPA accounts and is clearly promo. These are just promo articles with deletion being initiated by several editors, so there's clear consensus as such. As such, your account popping up at all of these indicates that it may be best to refrain from such promo articles, which are WP:NOT. You are aware of COI and WP:DISCLOSE, and my understanding is you claim no COI. Have you ever had any communication on or offwiki about any of these cryptocurrency articles and/or organisations, and/or with other editors or people or companies that are the subject or have any connection to any of these? Widefox; talk 21:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Widefox. I appreciate your concern but I have no connection to any of these organisation or fields, and have no communication with anyone from these organisations and fields either online or offline. I have just been very interested in following developments in the "crypto-space", which as i'm sure you're aware is a hot topic at the moment and attracting a lot of interest. I had not heard the term Crypto Valley before I discovered someone had written a wiki article on the subject. Having done some searching on the term it appeared to be used quite widely in independent third party sources, so I added references and attempted to tidy up the previously poorly referenced article. My personal vote would be keep on that one, given the sources, but other members of the community are free to make up their own minds. Uhooep (talk) 22:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for replying again. Sorry for the repeat question. If you haven't seen, WP:RECENTISM may be worth a glance. Regards Widefox; talk 22:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

Hi Uhooep, following on #Promo articles, I just came across another of your articles RChain. Can you explain. Do you have any other accounts? Also, have you ever used another account or edited as an IP? (no need to tell me what IP). Do you communicate with any other party, editor, or accounts? Widefox; talk 22:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uhooep, are you going to disclose your other accounts? (sorry, I forgot to ask before, are these to do with editing? Special:PrefixIndex/User:Uhooep/). Widefox; talk 13:05, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Widefox personal notes/tables and to do lists, primarily relating to tourist attractions and UNESCO World Heritage Sites by country/teritory, with a view to improving coverage, accuracy and furnishing with pictures, related articles. For example this contribution, this edit, this edit, and this one Uhooep (talk) 22:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Under construction icon

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Sorry for the template, but considering the number of non notable creations, it would help prevent all these deletions if you could use WP:AfC to get feedback before the articles are in mainspace. Do you agree? Widefox; talk 14:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yutaka Tokiwa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yutaka Tokiwa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yutaka Tokiwa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 14:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

 — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Berean Hunter this spare account was used to edit on politically sensitive subjects where I wanted the assurance of an additional layer of anonymity given that sometimes a user's real life identity can be ascertained from their main account. As you know not every country has free speech or freedom of the press, and in some instances writers are persecuted for the things they write, so such concerns are entirely valid and I don't think it's therefore appropriate for users such as User:Widefox to effectively rubbish such concerns by using phrases such as "pls ignore the cheating sock". I would like to contest the block, use my Uhooep account positively going forward, familiarise myself better with notability guidelines so that I don't repeat the mistake of some of my recent blockchain related article creations which were deleted, and promise to retain only one account going forward, although that means I would refrain from editing on sensitive subjects, such as Paradise Papers as I don't feel my identity is well hidden enough. Anyway, in relation to Widefox's repeated COI concerns I reiterate that I have zero COIs. Retired with no commercial interests, links to individuals included herein, or any dialogue with external parties saying "hey mate brush up our wikipedia article for you will you"hey. All my edits are mine and mine alone on subjects which interest me, ranging from science, academia, business, politics, religion, law, and most recently I started writing about blockchain. I'm sure i've missed some out. Anyway I am happy to cooperate as much as I can in getting this issue resolved. But if you still think a life ban is appropriate then there is probably nothing much I can do about it. I didn't even realise having two accounts was such a major issue, though I recognise the potential misuses which may stem from it. As I say my intention was purely identity protection. Kind regards Uhooep (talk) 22:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you pinged me, I will reply to just my part. Agree my edit summary was below standard, the comment left was "indef blocked". Having multiple accounts without disclosing is socking, right? You acknowledge it's not allowed? Why didn't you reply when I asked if you had more accounts? [1], [2] in a style that was clear I knew about it? You carried on editing [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. After that, I mentioned AfC to help prevent deletion and such drama in future, and nothing to do with COI [9] . As you say yourself, you've created several non-notable topics. They were WP:SPA/COI/meat/sock magnets. I actually like your work, hence AfC suggestion. Widefox; talk 01:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your fair comments User:Widefox. I didn't respond because I don't have access to a computer at the moment, am responding on mobile. Was going to attempt to deal with this when I get computer access again. I have a reasonable understanding of the notability guidelines surrounding politicians, academics etc (vice-chancellors, notable scientific prize winners, cabinet ministers, national legislature members etc easily pass) but I probably need to brush up on CORP. I think by far the vast majority of my previous article creations have met these guidelines, just a few of the recent ones have fallen through the cracks. I feel a few of your notability tags are a little excessive, for example I think Paul Lester (businessman) easily passes, it just requires additional citations. I didn't realise multiple accounts were so strictly forbidden, I thought in the case of the SPA/socks related to the Polkadot (project) articles that that user was allowed to continue editing afterwards. Uhooep (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That other editor had disclosed their account, I only took to SPI as I was prompted to (to clear it from COIN I guess)
NP, discussed here Talk:Paul Lester (businessman). Widefox; talk 03:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not quite sure how this edit ten minutes after your other account's edit is legitimate. I won't accept editing on politically sensitive subjects as a rationale there. You use both accounts on several articles such as Tulip Siddiq. This ridiculous troll post belongs to you. This vandalism is also yours although I see that you removed it a few minutes later. The significance is that you are using the account to push your POV.

Hi User:Berean Hunter, re the edits, Lee Nelson had just pranked the Prime Minister during a speech. His name was all over the media. I added an image to his article, but apparently images of someone under arrest are not allowed. Tulip Siddiq has links to the Bangladeshi regime, but free speech doesn't always go down well there and there have been disappearances so concerns are valid. I probably forgot to log out to the shield or it was before the controversy occured. The ridiculous troll post you cite is actually inherent fact, it's just human beings have been conditioned to believe that royals exist, and coverage exists so it's fine to be included by wiki guidelines, but surely I am still entitled to point out my view that there is nothing inherently notable in my opinion about an unemployed 33 year old guy called Harry? At least in talk. It's just easier sometimes to articulate controversial truths anonymously, that's why twitter is what it is. The vandalism you point to was a mistake. I don't have any other accounts, at least that I can remember. I started editing wikipeida, initially from a visible IP range at my university must have been 10 years ago, before quite a few years later getting around to creating an account. I have lots of positive things I wish to bring to this project going forward and believe my positive contributions to date vastly outweigh any less shining examples. Uhooep (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let you file an unblock request and let another admin decide. Normally, checkuser blocks may only be undone by a checkuser but I'm willing to let any admin unblock in this case if they are satisfied or become so from further responses. If they do unblock, the other account should remain blocked and you should only use this one account and avoid editing while logged out from now on.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, i'm sorry for the trouble. I only want to use this account going forward. I wouldn't create another or do IP edits, so if not unblocked I won't contribute to this project further. This has been a useful lesson anyway. I doubt I will have the time to file an unblock request any time soon. As I say I only have mobile access for now. Uhooep (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Berean Hunter, I have submitted an unblock request above. Do you have any idea as to how long it might take before an admin, or yourself can take a look at this? Many thanks Uhooep (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Widefox, I have pinged the admin who created this block but they haven't responded. Not too sure if you also have admin status? I will leave an admin help request here too just in case somebody gets a chance to look at my case sooner. Regards, Uhooep (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
One can see who's an admin by clicking on their userpage etc, where you will see I'm not an admin. Widefox; talk 23:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't reply because I stated that I would let another admin decide. You don't need to post for admin help because your case has been in Category:Requests for unblock since you filed your request and is getting viewed and considered by various admins.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unblocked with the understanding that going forward, you will stick to one account only. This particularly includes "controversial truths". Huon (talk) 20:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Uhooep&oldid=831113398"