Jump to content

User talk:Meeanaya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Karthihosur (talk | contribs) at 05:27, 4 November 2019 (→‎Deletion of wiki page Roots industries: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page!

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or click here to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless there's a better place for them. Please read the following helpful hints before posting:

  • Wikipedia is a volunteer curated encyclopedia. That means it is not a social networking site, a place for self-promotion, a marketing medium or a free web host. You are expected to be familiar with the goals of this project before you post here.
  • Think. Use common sense.
  • If you wish to discuss your link additions, I advise you to be read our conflict of interest and spam policies before posting. These pages contain information about the appropriateness of link additions.
  • I prefer to be contacted here (as opposed to email) where possible. You're much more likely to get a prompt response.


Start a new talk topic

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Meeanaya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You did a great job on writing the article Rathasena Mata Temple, so I hope you like the place and decide to stay! Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you ever need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I am so glad you are here! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nandeshwar Lake

Hello, Meeanaya,

Thanks for creating Nandeshwar Lake! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nandeshwar Mahadev Temple

Hello, Meeanaya,

Thanks for creating Nandeshwar Mahadev Temple! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Irene Roberts

Hi, you didn't actually nominate this for deletion, you just added a link to a 2006 AFD. Therefore I have removed the AFD notice from the page. If you still wish to nominate the page for deletion, please follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO, noting what to do if the article has been nominated before. Thank you. — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 06:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion declined: Danielle Mastrion

Hello Meeanaya, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Danielle Mastrion, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 07:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply] 

Purnima Gupta  ==

Hi, we have improved about article. Please remove your deletion in our page. If still you want us to improve our article on Purnima Gupta please revert us back. ( Pavithra12 (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC) )[reply]

Speedy deletion

Hello Meeanaya -- Could I ask you to slow down with applying speedy deletion tags and re-read the rules for A7 carefully? The summary is that "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines." Mauro Castagnaro, when you tagged it, already had at least one claim that would have been enough to meet the A7 criteria. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 11:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow Espresso Addict's advice rather than continue with obviously incorrect speedy deletion nominations such as Bdood, Fiona Lazareff and Avni Shah. You are obviously keen to help, but you need to adjust your sights considerably before applying any more speedy deletion tags. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Purnima Gupta

I am sorry but I must ask you why you added Purnima Gupta to "the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions" ? FYI in modern times Astronomy is NOT related to Astrology. -- Bayoustarwatch (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Alsigarh) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Alsigarh.

User:Lapablo while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lapablo}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lapablo (talk) 11:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DELETION OF AN ARTICLE GOODLUCK MATHIAS

Hello, i saw notification of speedy deletion of the new page i just created.

I do not really understand why you do this i think you should review a person before doing this

Kindly retrieve my page as he is a signifacant person and i know someone will add contents about him later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pundorikaku (talk • contribs) 13:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Qais Qandil Biography

Good Day

why this page was considered for deletion?

it satisfies all conditions of Wikipedia, and it is not been created by a paid member, which is me, I am not getting paid for this.

please, update me with the needful to keep it for public view.

Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misfits2019 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Giga Ltd

Hello Meeanaya Regarding nomination Giga Ltd for deletion, I believe the articles contain sufficient information about the ISP firm, actually better than other existing ISP firm pages on Wikipedia, such as Andrews & Arnold. But I will be glad to improve the article as much as possible. Mohamed Benazzouz (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to drafts

Hello Meeanaya, I'd recommend using the script User:Evad37/MoveToDraft when moving articles to drafts, the script performs the necessary cleanup tasks such as marking the old redirect for deletion, notifying the author, and adding {{draft}} to the article (without which the user won't know how to publish their article for review).

I also want to recommend that you try to limit WP:OVERTAGGING, too many tags are often not helpful. You might want to consider spending a few weeks expanding some already existing articles since experience in writing good and well-referenced content is always beneficial.

Best, --89.153.169.78 (talk) 14:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apoorva Mehta

Just FYI, you don't need to send an article to AfD to "merge and redirect", which counts as a form of "keep" in an AfD discussion as the page history has to be kept when merging articles. You can propose merges on article talk pages, or do them yourself when they are obviously appropriate. For more information see WP:MERGE#Proposing a merge. Happy editing! – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 09:09, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

filelakeshoe, thanks will keep this in mind. Meeanaya (talk) 04:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phanindra Sama

How can you delete this page ? . All reference are very reliable these are from prestigious newspaper.This is fullfill all the policyand guidelines of Wikipedia

User:Abhishek shannu, let's talk on AFD. Meeanaya (talk) 05:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion nomination of Ritesh Agarwal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ritesh Agarwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — kashmīrī TALK 19:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bajajnagar, Udaipur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bajajnagar, Udaipur, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:CASSIOPEIA, this is a page for a village and not any promotional content, notability is inherited. Are you sure that it was a right move? Meeanaya (talk) 04:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Meeanaya, greetings. The above message indicated the article did not provide WP:SIGCOV coverage by publisehed independent, reliable sources (such as sources from newspapers and books) to support the content claimed and did not state the article is promotional. You provided the list of school in Udaipur but what we need are sources talk about the subject "directly" and not merely passing mentioned. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:34, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bajajnagar, Udaipur has been accepted

Bajajnagar, Udaipur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christopher_Ategeka

Meeanaya, I was conversing with Tone on the user talk He mentioned that I can go over to the draft section and restart the article in the draft section to address the issues you raised 1. I dont know how to locate "the draft section" 2. I dont know how to get a hold of Tone on user talk anymore

Can you help?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmfisch3 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please visit Wikipedia:Articles for creation for help. Meeanaya (talk) 04:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hello meeanaya . you added Sonu(Composer) for This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. I want to say that is sources are taken from medium and here is Google knowledy panel https://g.co/kgs/aGYiBT. I hope I'll receive positive response. thanks , Manak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijassmanak (talk • contribs) 05:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User-generated content

Please do not cite user-generated content on this project, as you did here. The random blogs, forums, websites, etc., which are created by non-credentialed people, are considered unrelaible here – see WP:UGC. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo Molero

Hello Meeanaya, This page satisfies all conditions of Wikipedia, and it is not been created by a paid member, which is me, I am not getting paid for this. Please, update let me know how better to improve it to keep it for public view. David Morón (talk) 16:43, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I might agree to you once you share the details, from where you got this ? Meeanaya (talk) 04:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The picture for which evidence of permission is being processed comes from his official website. David Morón (talk) 08:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the permission for the picture mentioned above has been granted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Morón (talk • contribs) 04:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Jennifer Hardy CK

Hi there, this is my first time writing an article on Wikipedia. I saw your message: "Strong Delete: A few minor roles, nothing significant for her. Meeanaya (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2019". Unsure if you've checked some of the resources in Jennifer Hardy CK wiki link, but she had first lead in the film "Spice It Up" and her Jennifer Hardy CK name was used in National Post & Now Magazine since she's the lead in the film. "Spice It Up" is also on Wikipedia link with her photo on the film poster, if the film is large enough to be a Wikipedia entry then I think so should the lead. Is there anything else that I need to add or change in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aalamina (talk • contribs) 18:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dodawali has been accepted

Dodawali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks Bishal Shrestha, can you also review Draft:Peepliya, its pending from long now. Meeanaya (talk) 05:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done mate. Thanks for your contribs! Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peepliya has been accepted

Peepliya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:RETAIN

Will you please stop reverting the names into "OPPO"? Article relating to Oppo phones have used "Oppo" as the common title, not the upper-case one which is merely a stylized text of the company's brand. Per MOS:RETAIN, maintaining consistent usage in articles is important. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Aachhat.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article, but note that it needs to be more fully integrated with the rest of Wikipedia. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the page.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jaswantgarh (Udaipur) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jaswantgarh (Udaipur), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:29, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Dubin

hi Meeanaya, I previously felt that the Glenn Dubin page was Advert & COI. So I went through and added citations and removed content for which citations went the other way or i couldn't find citations for. Can you please clarify what you are seeing to add the tag? Thanks, WestportWiki (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi Meeanaya, just following up here. Thank you WestportWiki (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WestportWiki, still there is a lot that needs to be improved, did a small example here. I will remove the tags, once the issues are completely resolved.Meeanaya (talk) 04:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
hi Meeanaya, thank you for responding. I’ve removed COO tag as I went through all the citation. Given that the page is citation driven can you please expand on the ADV claim. Otherwise I’ll give it another read and revert. WestportWiki (talk) 11:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
hi Meeanaya, how did you arrive at the conclusion that the page is COI? WestportWiki (talk) 12:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi Meeanaya, just follow up.WestportWiki (talk) 13:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC) WestportWiki (talk) 13:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaswantgarh (Udaipur) has been accepted

Jaswantgarh (Udaipur), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The No Spam Barnstar
You deserve it for cleaning 🧹 the spam on Wikipedia. Thanks me later. :) Harshil want to talk? 12:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Meeanaya. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 20:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone through New Pages Review. Thank you. Meeanaya (talk) 04:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page review

Can you look into a page Draft:Jayride, it has detailed news coverage from The Australian, Business Insider, The Australian Financial Review, Entrepreneur (magazine), WSAU and others. It is there in draft and I dont know what to do next. 157.37.204.246 (talk) 04:07, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have rights at AFC, I will check what I can do if the subject is notable. Meeanaya (talk) 04:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Meeanaya (talk) 05:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Lakewood Lancers

Hi, I'd like to ask if you wouldn't mind looking at a page that was delted called "Lakewood Lancers," and please tell me what is missing or wrong with it that it continues to be deleted? It's a page merely sharing the history of a team, and I sent an email earlier regarding the common use of copyright material. All of the material including text and images is owned by me, so it has been donated for use here, but no one has replied to my email about the release. I would appreciate your time. Thanks. BigRed66BigRed66 (talk) 04:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BigRed66, please go through WP:GNG, hope it helps. Meeanaya (talk) 05:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Francis Moss

Thank you for reviewing so quickly. I reread the Tone guidelines this morning, but I could not see anything obvious, 1st person, exclamation, for example. Can you offer me some more specific section I need to focus on? I will reread the guidelines again meantime and thank you for your patience. ~~Ged~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gedgmoss (talk • contribs) 08:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Is your comment on tone directed at the quote Father of Education in Sheffield (Puffery) ? Gedgmoss (talk) 09:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Ged[reply]

A few resources will help, WP:CONTENT, WP:GNG and WP:5P. Meeanaya (talk) 08:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lina Caceres

Please tell me why you transferred Lina caceres to draft and why you want to delete Catalina maya's wikipedia whats missing??

Topmartz (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page fails WP:GNG, it needs to pass through WP:AFC. Meeanaya (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AGF

On what basis do you believe Cecilia Harvey is "Created by undisclosed paid editor" as you said at AfD? That's quite an accusation to throw around. No-one has suggested it on the creating editor's talk page, nor (till just now) dropped a welcome template there. Yes, it's the first article they have created, but everyone starts somewhere: do you suspect that they are a sockpuppet of another editor? PamD 11:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PamD, I am not sure if I am not smart enough. But it is 1,000% paid editing from a big sock farm. It was a proper planned perfect execution, the biggest hint I got with the photo, a private, nice high quality photo uploaded on commons from flickr. So first, a new flickr account created in October 2019, Photo was uploaded on flickr on 15 Oct, uploaded on commons on 17 Oct, page editing started on sandbox from 10 Oct, made over 10 edits, got auto confirmed account and moved to mainspace on 21 October with no errors. Meeanaya (talk) 06:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Chaturvedi

Hi there,

I just noticed that you moved Akshay Chaturvedi to draft space a couple of days ago and no reason was given. Could you please explain why you moved it from main space to draft space?Lubna S. Shaikh (talk) 13:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion bridge21

I contested this using the button, but wanted to mention this here too because I don't think I addressed the reasoning for the contestation sufficiently.

bridge21 is a globally recognized payments provider. The (direct) references about bridge21 include NASDAQ (that's the second largest stock exchange in the world), American Banker (the largest banking publication in the world), and Techstars (one of the top 2 company accelerators in the world).

The company is not insignificant in the payments industry, as is proven by the references that have written about bridge21. While I did not include it in the article for the sake of brevity and to keep the entry non-commercial, we are one of the oldest operating blockchain technology companies. The British and Mexican governments invited us to their countries because what we do is so innovative in our industry. Cambridge University studied us a few years ago. We should really have a wikipedia page. Thank you for reconsidering!

Tagging of Fat Head Racing Driver Development Program

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Fat Head Racing Driver Development Program. I do not think that Fat Head Racing Driver Development Program fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "The team has since grown into one of the largest SLM and PLM Development teams in the world" is a claim of significence. I request that you consider not re-tagging Fat Head Racing Driver Development Program for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 05:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles to draftspace

Hi Meeanaya, noticed you moved two high schools to draft space but you haven't done this correctly. Please see WP:DRAFTS, thank you Steven (Editor) (talk) 01:45, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello Meeanaya,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 799 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of wiki page Roots industries

Hello Meena,

This page for Roots industries is given external credible reference such The Hindu's link and motoronlineindi.

Roots industries is highly reputed brand in automobile sector for its Auto horns. Moreover the Roots industries in mentioned in the follwoing Wiki pages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Coimbatore and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Companies_based_in_Coimbatore

First I'm thankful calling for discussion which makes me understand further on wiki's terms on Articles.

Hope the above mentioned points are worthy request you to Kindy consider my points and remove the deletion tag for Roots industries wiki page. 

Karthihosur (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)  Thanks![reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Meeanaya&oldid=924493836"