User talk:HappyWaldo

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, HappyWaldo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SatuSuro 13:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Western Bulldogs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Etihad Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Sydney montage

I changed the montage because there's various issues with the current. We already have an image of Sydney Uni in the article body, there's no need to be repetitious, and the image of Darling Harbour is so nondescript it could literally be any city. There's no distinguishing feature about that particular image that conveys historical importance or even a landmark, and for that reason, I think Fort Denison is a more worthy addition. It's historic, it's a landmark, and it represents Sydney's very important Colonial past. If there's any issue with recognisability, then users can simply click the corresponding link in the caption. Ashton 29 (talk) 07:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HappyWaldo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Government images on Australia article

Hello, after your initial revert, I created a new section on the Australia talk page for this to be resolved, and noted as much in the edit note for my revert. You did not attempt to resolve the matter there, but instead reverted again. Please see that section so that the issue can be resolved. Thank you. - Lawarticles (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Gaelic football

Hi, I don't understand why you've unded my changes, I add sources and all writed is true. undue weight? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaelicMan (talk • contribs) 23:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fred Lowry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stockman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian rules football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offside law. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinatown, Melbourne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Bradley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Removal of images from Ned Kelly page

Hello HappyWaldo. Can you please stop arbitrarily removing mages from Ned Kelly page. Per WP:DR, can we try and reach a compromise? Instead of deleting images, why not make the improvements per WP:STACKING (Which is not a policy, but a guide). In regards to having 'too many images', can you point me to the policy that states that 34 is the limit for images in a page. Thank-you David.moreno72 09:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Addition of dispute to Third opinion.

Hi HappyWaldo, I have lodged our dispute at Third opinion. Thank-you David.moreno72 08:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I noticed that in this edit to Ned Kelly, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. David.moreno72 08:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ned Kelly, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. David.moreno72 09:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ned Kelly, you may be blocked from editing. David.moreno72 09:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ned Kelly. David.moreno72 09:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ned Kelly. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Ned Kelly

Please note that you came extremely close to being blocked for edit warring and violating 3RR on this article. If a content-related dispute occurs, you're expected to discuss the dispute on the article's talk page; do not edit war, please... even if you think (or "know") that you're right. And please be more careful next time ;-). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ettrick Bay, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Removed perfectly valid image gallery. scope_creep (talk) 10:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Ettrick Bay

The article is brand new, can you stop trying to mess it up. It's brand new. I've reported you to Oshwah. If you still here, please go to WP:teahouse and look for a mentor. I could be one if you want. To edit an article which has been created, you go to the talk page, tell everybody else what you to do. All they editors agree on it, through a consensus and then the edit is made. This is policy document for this proces: Wikipedia:Consensus. Please read it. scope_creep (talk) 10:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

The images come from the commons. That the reason they are, ready for new articles to be added. scope_creep (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

History of Australian rules football in Victoria (1859-1900)

Your comments have been noted! I do not like being rude to anyone and will not break that rule.

With best wishes,Albert Isaacs (talk) 06:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Australia

Sorry, I didn't mean to revert your changes to this article - the article got laggy and somehow it happened. My intention was to reinstore the section you removed. Please start a discussion on the article's talk page. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

About Waterfall, Strath Creek

Hi HappyWaldo,
I have started a little micro-stub about this painting. I notice you uploaded the image used in the article to Commons. If you are interested in that sort of thing - by which I mean DYKs, not Australian artworks - it might make a tidy little DYK, given that it has been called "iconic" and has been homaged in other artworks.
Il faut imaginer Pete AU heureux aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Wake in Fright

This section on Gary Bond in The Encyclopaedia of British Film lists Wake in Fright as a "UK/Australian" production (https://books.google.com.au/books?id=V7vPDQAAQBAJ&pg=RA1-PA1905&dq=wake+in+fright+1971+uk+production&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwix2-yeic_WAhXDUbwKHQvaDA0Q6AEILzAB#v=onepage&q=wake%20in%20fright%201971%20uk%20production&f=false), while the BFI lists it as an Australian-US-UK production. Histories of the production (http://www.sbs.com.au/movies/article/2009/06/01/making-wake-fright-part-one) indicate the involvement of Group W's London offices in production.

Thanks for your response - I'm happy to concede if you want, and I'll remove the two sources from the infobox for the time being. I'm actually working on a major overhaul of the article as a whole ATM, so if I find anything concrete of any British involvement, I'll let you know. PatTheMoron (talk) 12:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Table Melbourne top 20 birth countries

Template:Table Melbourne top 20 birth countries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Changes to Ned Kelly page

Hi HappyWaldo, I notice that you have been introducing errors and removing pictures from the Ned Kelly page. In regards to removing pictures, please respect the two previous RfC's for the addition of relevant images. If you wish to remove images, please start a RfC to obtain consensus. Thank you David.moreno72 07:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ned Kelly, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. David.moreno72 14:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ned Kelly, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David.moreno72 15:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Improper use of references

Hi HappyWaldo. I notice that you are still introducing unsourced and incorrect edits to the Ned Kelly page. I reviewed your source available at https://books.google.com.au/books?id=WhczfF4KdawC and nowhere does it state that while a teenager Ned led the 'Greta Mob'. May I remind you that Ned spent most of his later teenage years in jail. Yes he was still technically a teenager when he was released in 1874, six months early for good behaviour, for a total of two and a half years, not three, as you keep incorrectly stating, so you will need to provide a source that explicitly states that he was leading the 'Greta Mob' in 1874. I also notice that you keep reverting my good faith and correct edits. May i suggest that you read WP:ONLYREVERT. Thank you David.moreno72 01:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Australian rules football reverts

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Australian rules football, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines, because your reasons given were not legitimate. Also be aware of WP:OWN and that edits must be understandable for non-Australian readers .If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Arianewiki1 (talk) 05:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Violation of WP:AGF and WP:ONLYREVERT and WP:V

Hi HappyWaldo. I've checked the reference for you edit to the Kelly page and I can't see the part that says he joined the Greta mob as a teenager. Can you please quote the section please, otherwise I will have to revert per WP:V and WP:FIES. Also why do you keep reverting my small addition of adding relative to 'thanks in part to the support of an extensive network of sympathisers.' Have you read the royal commission report? The family members provided much more support than the sympathisers? You need to actually read WP:ONLYREVERT and WP:OWN and WP:AGF as it is only you who is having any issues with my edits. I have already had to correct many of your edits, not for prose, which is subjective, but for actual historical errors. The edits that I make have all been historically correct, and so per WP:ONLYREVERT YOU CANNOT REVERT THEM, especially without an edit summary citing any wikipedia policy or guideline. just because you disagree with the prose. This is NOT YOUR private site, but a collaborative environment. A review of your talkpage is a litany of complaints and warnings from numerous editors about your hostility to other editors. THIS MUST STOP. David.moreno72 10:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring on Australian rules football

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Australian rules football. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 06:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ==

Arianewiki1 (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HappyWaldo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirin J. Callinan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Australia-Geography

Hi HappyWaldo. Can you please clarify what you mean by calling it a ‘‘pissing contest’’? Are you saying that other users are trying to show superiority with their own country’s geography pages? If that is the case, then I don’t believe that this has to be a subject of showing who has the better looking country, but rather just showing every country’s natural beauty for everyone to see and appreciate. Is there any other reason for undoing my edit? Does it have anything to do with using up too much data or causing difficulty to upload perhaps? Thank you, SSJHomer (talk) 12:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Gallery of Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Australian rules football :Protected

Annoyingly, Swarm has protected the Aussie rules page for a month as a circuit breaker –– annoying because I thought we were about to make some headway. I will present the problems with the text as I see it on the article's Talkpage for further discussion. Please highlight any issues there. If you really need to change something, simply make a request to an Admin.

In the meantime, I will be soon starting to watch the annual ANZAC Day Essendon v. Collingwood match. (Hope it is a better game than it has been in the last few years.) Arianewiki1 (talk) 04:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

@Arianewiki1:, If you want to resolve this, then we will continue the discussion here. Clean slate. Let's go through the disputed material carefully, piece by piece.

We will begin by looking at the Australian rules football match that occurred in London in 1888. At this point in our back-and-forth, I'm sure you agree that this match occurred (that IP who deleted the original uncited sentence is therefore incorrect in his edit summary, claiming that Australian rules was never played in the UK back then). The amount of archival evidence available for the match is overwhelming, those newspaper articles I found for you being but two examples. The sentence that you reverted in question reads:

"Australian rules football was played outside Australasia as early as 1888 when Australians studying at English and Scottish universities formed teams and competed in London."

The secondary source I found and cited, Scots in Australia (written by historian Malcolm David Prentis, published by the University of New South Wales. Meets WP:RELIABLE), reads:

"... there was a match in London in 1888 between teams from Edinburgh and London Universities. Many of the players were second or third generation Scottish-Australians."

Please explain the issue that you have with this. - HappyWaldo (talk) 04:29, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. However, do it on the article page not here, as the Admins can see it. Arianewiki1 (talk) 04:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Image of captain Thunderbolt/William Westwood

I found this image in Citi News, an Australian website. Are you sure he isn't William Westwood? (I have no idea). If it is wrong, the name of the file on Wikimedia Commons is also wrong, so it must been corrected. --Tajotep (talk) 12:12, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Australian rules football - Talk section

I'll start a talk section on the page.Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 07:50, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hobart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Glover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Such is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins

Hello! Your submission of Such is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Such Is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins

On 27 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Such Is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Australian rules football player Ben Cousins co-produced a documentary film depicting his struggle with drug addiction? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Such Is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Art Gallery of South Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Glover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden Summer, Eaglemont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Argus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Swarm ♠ 02:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Violation of Arbitration restriction on Reverts

You just reverted my edit again in violation of the restrictions imposed Zubin12 (talk) 02:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

• @Zubin12: The restriction was logged at 02:10, nothing before then counts. Swarm ♠ 02:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

My apologies I misread the time of your edits. Zubin12 (talk) 02:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Paintings by John Peter Russell

Generally we try to avoid starting categories like this with only one member. They serve no useful purpose. It's better to wait until there are at least say three. Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

To enforce an arbitration decision and for severely violating the discretionary sanctions regarding living persons, specifically the 1RR rule on the page Jordan Peterson, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Λυδαcιτγ 04:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

• HappyWaldo, I am not surprised to see this. Drmies (talk) 18:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
• Literally one day after the block expires and you violate the restriction again on the same article? Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of a restriction. My bad. - HappyWaldo (talk) 15:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

How are you not aware of a restriction you were blocked for literally 4 days ago? Seriously. Also the minimum expected would be a self reversion Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Is it not recommended to keep the disputed material off the page while it's discussed? I thought it was poor form for PeterTheForth to add it back when things had just gotten started. - HappyWaldo (talk) 15:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

I've filed an arbitration enforcement request here Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)