User talk:Jojalozzo: Difference between revisions
→Solid mainstream source in accordance with V: Fix typo. (According to the authors pseudoscience is a "serious matter" that threatens public health. It is OR if we don't summarise the main pseudoscience points. See WP:V. |
remove content that belongs on article talk page |
||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Regards from [[User:Nettrom|Nettrom]] ([[User talk:Nettrom|talk]]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 08:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC) |
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Regards from [[User:Nettrom|Nettrom]] ([[User talk:Nettrom|talk]]), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 08:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
{{hidden begin |toggle=right |title=QG TLTR |titlestyle=background:lightgrey; }} |
|||
== Pseudoscience == |
|||
=== Repeated pattern of violating core policies === |
|||
You replaced sourced text with a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&action=historysubmit&diff=415811756&oldid=415339750 1965 reference on quackery] that did not verify the claim. |
|||
The previous reference you deleted against V policy verified the claim "Pseudoscience, superstitions, and quackery are serious issues that are a threat to [[public health]]." |
|||
You added [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&action=historysubmit&diff=420087292&oldid=419869679 OR]. The sentence "Pseudoscience can negatively impact health, politics and education." was also OR. |
|||
You added [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&diff=next&oldid=416996275 OR]. The sentence "Some forms of pseudoscience such as [[superstition]]s, and medical quackery can be serious threats to [[public health]]." is OR. The sentence "The [[National Science Foundation]], has called for better public education about pseudoscience in order to combat scientific misinformation, misrepresentation and fraud." is also OR. |
|||
You added "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&diff=next&oldid=418544600 Pseudoscientific explanations and concepts acquired by students outside of school can be obstacles in science education]." The sentence is OR. For example, you were [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&action=historysubmit&diff=424719653&oldid=424719443 unable to verify the claim]. |
|||
Please stop adding unsourced text or text that failed verification to the article. Do you agree to stop adding [[WP:OR]]? [[User:QuackGuru|QuackGuru]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|talk]]) 18:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
=== Solid mainstream source in accordance with V === |
|||
The Mattel et al. ref is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pseudoscience&curid=23768&diff=429752795&oldid=429736491 high-quality source]. Your objection is with V policy. You seem to have a personal disagreement with the authors. It is inappropriate behaviour to suggest the source is unreliable. |
|||
It is OR if you take the source out of context. We must include the public health issue because the authors think pseudoscience is a serious matter. |
|||
One of the main pseudoscience points from full text is: "As preoccupied and active as many governmental and sceptical organizations are in their fight against pseudoscience, quackery, superstitions and related problems, their efforts in making the public understand the scientific facts required to make good and informed decisions are not always as effective as they should be. Pseudoscience can be defined as any belief or practice that pretends to be scientific but lacks supporting evidence. Quackery is a particular type of pseudoscience that refers to medical treatments. Superstitions are irrational beliefs that normally involve cause–effect relations that are not real, as those found in pseudoscience and quackery. These are a serious matter of public health and educational policy in which many variables are involved." |
|||
The authors thought it was so important they summarised the public health issue in the abstract. According to the authors pseudoscience is a serious matter that threatens public health. It is OR if we don't summarise the main pseudoscience points. |
|||
From abstract: "Pseudoscience, superstitions, and quackery are serious problems that threaten public health and in which many variables are involved." |
|||
{{cite journal |journal=Br J Psychol |year=2010 |volume= |issue= |pages= |title= Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience |author= Matute H, Yarritu I, Vadillo MA |doi=10.1348/000712610X532210 |pmid=21092400 |url=http://bpsoc.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjp/pre-prints/bjp898 }} Do you agree the [[WP:V]] compliant source must be restored and sumarised at Pseudoscience? [[User:QuackGuru|QuackGuru]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|talk]]) 18:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
=== Please stop === |
|||
I have not read what you have written and will not discuss this with you here. This is not a personal issue it is a community issue. Please use the [[Talk:Pseudoscience|article talk page]]. I view your posting here as verging on harassment. <font color="#500000">[[User:Jojalozzo|Joja]]</font><font color="#005000">[[User talk:Jojalozzo|lozzo]]</font> 01:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
No, you please stop your original research and editing against core Wikipedia policy. You have repeatedly ignored my comments on the talk page and forced me to come to your talk page. Do you agree to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJojalozzo&action=historysubmit&diff=429758904&oldid=427874802 stop editing against Wikipedia policy and agree the peer-reviewed reliable source must be restored]. Please remove the OR you added to the article. You have refused to provided verification in accordance with V policy. Do not falsely accuse me of harassment again and try to start collaborating with other editors rather than continue to ignore the concerns in regard to your repeated pattern of edits against long established policy. You are trying the patience of the community. Do you understand that a lot of text you added to the article is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJojalozzo&action=historysubmit&diff=429758904&oldid=427874802 against Wikipedia policy]. Please make an effort to edit in accordance with Wikipedia policies. [[User:QuackGuru|QuackGuru]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|talk]]) 18:00, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{hidden end}} |
|||
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == |
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == |
||
Revision as of 19:50, 1 June 2011
primary sources
Hello, I noticed you deleted all the information i put down on the Grameen Foundation because they were primary resources. I am fairly new at editing and I am doing this for a class project for my University. I would very much appreciate any help or advice you could give me regarding my edits as well as allow me to make edits. Jvele (talk) 04:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC) jvele
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
"That poor student was probably taken aback..."
end
|
|||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
|
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
|
TUSC token d73206ce5ea814e8bf250d064215ba6f
My toolserver user screening control (TUSC) ID is d73206ce5ea814e8bf250d064215ba6f.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)