User talk:Vanished user 6393699

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sourov0000 (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 31 December 2013 (→‎Happy New Year 2014!: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



 This user is Indian Wikipedian and a proud citizen of the
Republic of India


User:Sohambanerjee1998/Top icon

CAN'T RETIRE
Vanished user 6393699 tried to leave Wikipedia, but found that he couldn't do so…
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Send Me @n Email Man if it's a bit private

Yo Maan (man in carribean accent), Imma have some fun!

Template:Shoutbox sidebar

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. I am always open to civil discussion. I will respond on this talk page unless you specify otherwise.

(In the memories of Faizan and Tolly4bolly)

PISTOL SWORDS: ASSASSIN'S CREED

I didn't reference them as there's not anything you can reference, other than videos or the game's specific wikia page. Can you please put the addition back onto the page, please? Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV-EsCabqQo (Not signing as I'm not logged in, and I don't want to put my ISP here) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.149.205 (talk) 21:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Template

Hello Soham, I want to say that you have recently deleted my template 2013 indian films. It was so encyclopedic and useful for bollywood films that are released in 2013. Can you give me a reason why you delete it?

First of all don't post twice and sign them using ~~~~. Second, you've done what is called gaming the system which means you've tried to or have made inappropriate edits using loopholes in Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You created that template without discussing as a result of which Dharma tagged it for deletion. Now seeing it in risk of being deleted you added it in each and every single Bollywood film article with the theory The Template has been used by more than 100 articles of wikipedia. It should not be delete and The Template has been used by many articles in wikipedia. So it could not be delete which is no longer true because I have reverted all of them 'manually and have sore thumbs. Lastly the template has not been deleted yet, rest assured it will be.

The discussion for the deletion is ongoing and can be found here.

Note: Only three pages use the template. Sohambanerjee1998 12:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Everyone that been to it agrees so I think you should keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.172.218.147 (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Tooh (song)

Hello! Your submission of Tooh (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 23:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tooh (song)

07:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Archived main page. Soham (talk) 14:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A note

You're still logged in as your "Sohambanerjee1998" account; I suggest you log out, and log back in with the "Soham" account. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lukeno94, thanks. Oi it worked! Soham 13:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Catching up with my watchlist, tons of disruption. Thinking about quitting. Soham 13:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Its too draining not to mention discouraging when you know that your efforts will go down the drain. Plus wheres the diff for that vandalism? Soham 14:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • There were way too many diffs, many of which were RevDelled. It is draining, but then you could focus on writing articles rather than fighting vandalism, if that made you happier :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To be true article creation does make me happy. Soham 16:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Aschorjyo Pradeep

I have no chance to see the film soon. So, can't ass the plot. Have you seen it?--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gemini FA review

The article Gemini (2002 Tamil film) is currently a FAC. Do please have a thorough look at the article, and suggest any improvements. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I will but at the time web pages tend to take huge amounts of time to load, I will do it once I am running up again. Soham 16:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I found an image of the film crew here. It is from the production house's (AVM) official twitter page. Can I upload it under fair use rationale? If so, what license would be appropriate? -- Sriram speak up 07:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I have always used the file upload wizard to upload images. How to upload files without using the wizard? -- Sriram speak up 08:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) At the upload page, there is an option "old guided form". Upload through that. Or best, upload through commons. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 08:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah! I was quite scared to do anything when I started off. Don't know which option to use. Took me quite a while to upload my first image!! -- Sriram speak up 08:15, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I could upload the image but I don't know which licence to use. So here's the deal: I upload it via commons through any licencing and one of you change it. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 08:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No not in commons, I am uploading it wait. Soham 08:36, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot pal. Btw, the image was taken at a function to celebrate the completion of 125days theatrical run. So, is there any changes to be made to the file description? -- Sriram speak up 08:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, the link provided was where I saw the image, But the twitter handle is this. Sorry for the confusion. -- Sriram speak up 08:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you can make them yourself. If you have any confusions ask me. Soham 08:53, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Thanx. -- Sriram speak up 09:32, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CIFF

Can you do me a favour and fix the summary and licensing info for this image? -- Sriram speak up 07:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sriram Vikram, yes I'll do it. But what do you want me to do? Everything's fine, do you want me to flesh the fair-use for a FA? Is that is what required? Soham 08:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
One of the FA reviewers of Gemini asked to add "more meat on the bone" for the image. You may take this as reference. And if you have seen the article the image has been used, its a stub. So, not for a FA but just to satisfy NFCC.-- Sriram speak up 08:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Whats the use of fleshing up the infobox file for a stub? Soham 08:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well. I intend to expand it in the near future. :) -- Sriram speak up 08:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Then a fun challenge for you, get it to GA with a 20x expansion and I'll not only flesh the fair-use I'll also convert it to vector. Soham 08:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am working on it. Currently in the process of creating an article for the current edition (11th CIFF) happening even when we are talking. -- Sriram speak up 08:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, whats a vector? -- Sriram speak up 11:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Scalable Vector Graphics. Soham 11:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hiya again! Is there any film festival articles that are either GA or FA? I need one for reference. -- Sriram speak up 07:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I don't know one, there may be though. Soham 07:54, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. -- Sriram speak up 08:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude! Thanks for your Xmas wishes and wishing you the same. Forgive me for my late reply as I have been unwell. After much effort, I have created the article. 11th Chennai International Film Festival :) -- Sriram speak up 16:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How did I fare in your challenge? -- Sriram speak up 06:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty well but touch 100 refs barrier and a GA . Soham (talk) 06:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's impossible. This is pretty much it. The refs can't reach 100. The article has these many refs mainly because it was presented by The Hindu. Else, it would have been even worse. I can get it to GA with some work particularly in 'Reception' section. -- Sriram speak up 07:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Then make it, meanwhile I'll trace the image, do you any higher resolution? Soham (talk) 07:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For the logo? I doubt it. There is a video in youtube introducing the logo. Check the 'External links' section of the article. Take a look at the video and see it will be useful. Gotto take a snapshot though. -- Sriram speak up 07:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Provide me higher than 500 pixels. Soham (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Made a snapshot and have updated the logo. File:CIFF 11 Logo.jpg -- Sriram speak up 07:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sriram Vikram, I have made the digital transparent background version check it now! Soham (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Forgive my ignorance but may I know what that's for? Is it used to create the svg? -- Sriram speak up 08:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, its the digital raster version I'll create the vector from. I created it. Soham (talk) 09:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! Cool. -- Sriram speak up 09:05, 22 December 2013

CIFF DYK

Hey again! An editor has tagged this image File:CIFF 11 Logo.jpg as orphaned. What am I supposed to do? Should I let it get deleted? -- Sriram speak up 14:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry the one in the article won't get deleted, this will though. Plus if you want to remove any watermarks from images, contact me Soham 14:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thanks dude. The article now has a DYK nomination too! Here its my first and I donno if it needs any review. Can you take a look? -- Sriram speak up 14:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have started the review, follow the page and reply to my queries. Soham 14:43, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Refs 44 through 47 aren't used to support claims in promotion. I'm not sure where to add them. So, just left it to be done later. -- Sriram speak up 14:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You can't leave unused refs like these, especially in DYK articles, the article get failed. Immediately sort out the issues I have listed at the nomination page and reply there instead of replying here. Soham 14:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. See you there. -- Sriram speak up 15:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure of this, so asking you here. Is this the first award instituted in the name of Big B? If so, will it be a convincing hook? -- Sriram speak up 18:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A general question. Are there two sets of contents that appear everyday in DYK? I just noticed today's section showing two diff sets everytime I refresh. -- Sriram speak up 17:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
One more question, this time more specific. Can I make a slight modification to the hook? I want it to be either of the two
Seems that your reply was lost in an edit conflict. :( -- Sriram speak up 13:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it was. Wait let me check the rules first. Soham 13:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think its such a big issue. Its just a minor change to inform the reader it happened recently. So, I prefer the second one. -- Sriram speak up 13:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • There seems to be no rule regarding this. The hook still has'n't been promoted so I think its possible, I've Vensatry and at WP:TH. Wait, lets see. Soham 13:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Take your time. -- Sriram speak up 13:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Suggest them as ALTs and I'll do a re-review. Soham 17:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashchorjyo Prodeep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


You've got mail!

Hello, Vanished user 6393699. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Herald talk with me 15:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I voted!

SPID: 6171


BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

hQEMA5FENmMP0xeaAQf/bBhzdFo2zTXv9gpZiwReCLuF0OKon8toC67yojvRIo3l mn59u8IobMN7iaXCmYKkf5qo8xPP3f8c9i2DszbnNMI/Bs3qjtIP2HCsF3dGUYfS z5oTrxAC5hjxuCEQx+lNF50RGYtBWpNtgBidS9vez825ZDj9QkGuTECYtyExaDce qEyrOLoqjxMloB/ZoCFr+mQ04/t5QRfHD5xIoxo5ptU6z6kv6e+gw8dAot6R+bIL 0PB6xmuq8FmeIaEa3eMiV8Ejg42mpVL4BOVV0ZR1D7EHTV4Au0kbJNnfsKVka/Hn SvOLKuQXP6ByBG3NysqzdWFOmy4Znl0OSyU8r97ettLqATin+XrwqT5btbibSwxT GYRQVxOTINSZOZ6uZ4Sj6YOmHlVpolFFr9KhI4DXJdCohUtIUAj0I0VXUpP/eU6C qbLBVJu99NQeSTYbgL5bo5rV+a7szu7g+CrIsx+2JupD0Nf6AN/HJLiF70s/0pDy RY4a8bEaJPSR3We4w0YeBDiI9tp0qIlTYEF9quwV2xH6aCIzVD2YwlZCvkjeeJQ3 i/bUeqibqQfpSdYYxLfayXGfNY24DqPhaxT1nnpeZqp8AxasZYhBu8XE4HSgi1wo 5MwcMXi7ShaJEIPwwMVwchW6c6X/TPdKr4ZyCiMonsVU7FeHb4OnWViHvUkmQ3bq k1tcJcurd/Xn7vrIk3zLdIDwnGoE+mETuZW2LuJs2KwuqFjSXi050hsJnzm66ivz +lBoXolNhkJ/3PuGKFCeF6psm4GqO2BRVnKAC0iuzLz4MEQbepLBRHQK6FTlGr1x vH3Qwsep5kobNhVaLQ7KOgrOVAGx4Y0eoQHDn0s27E9B7nDyjxTrTfEZQpw0Zt7+ bOEnTBMP8FFMp04rwQYpjID2GnHt8mUXufRYDWxRY+GI1W2uW5cCOG3bKdypNltr lNXPXfwmNw+7Yt+NgM06TEi6T2bMHs1IKN2XarlwyzoeEbOuZp6SeaJXocuRNV9J 1mSe2VXvxlhET1iFt9lPGheVrU30LodsmrPAwvBczbvaPiUGk2POyW2uQs6W00TS ZAsM7WuhpgAmDs3yKKb59Zar9KJeDwaJ87htyimTl48ZN22B4dfF1sNZmXG5n9xQ D/SWLWRBIZpE0A+Daj3C3c0dh2vOWL1QumChm/c/38Bs4syrf+lcTmqvqe6jjYRC TwBlzQgBaetNY3l2+UJVT3Qujh4Y6eOVxL01oXeYjz2hk+tc7EuGw4OjsQnnFh06 6be89F2H90FqVHFBHm8uw+0r32tul85Lj8QPS+gAHqxAlHYheRaxnKx2AqFwQDWR vrw1EqxTXFhpiEuSU3rw0eLyqX/gaBRHWfByopdQJ3nqdlqQj3gDq3hCRubnMmM7 vnB1bZYhFfEcwWtEK3z0zsgnv7POUcTw+hattjzM4fosG9X1AjR4heiyPgblQgij pfNbwK3GY1s8NE3CgpS3ihNRwKJckBBJiz1y9mGcBPKlL+3iUXSwdj6CDo7CjUQj SAoW92EFyo7rLpbZtRAXd/nb8pYuVl4hvOknNNmPx9lJwD0OL5t4NZJJITcc8ptH rUZ1JerxKIrtayHo8WxS5LUu65Vme9QE677wvCqFPz2ergLgWzls76Clo+pkT2/L bKqaFapRbi5AWUOQ6FouThtOIz3sqs9gHeFeB7UhNWXfwx890c9tH9NjlVJaLMRK 5nTLALRTRr6ewgR3xbWSiiXVTy3fy3y8wRnxHhRjDdyMPABqltwX7dXshSJOMUfI wZqnMsJwgjR/zyUCU2WO1bCnqVEgpq6kWDnITpk27PbA5U1z1aawtu27bsJyyLjD 1higC5ABb4z6MXnRzpTrgvbt3u9TAg== =WU7T


END PGP MESSAGE-----

Image trouble

Because u managed to upload that cast and crew image for Gemini (2002 Tamil film) without much problem, I was wondering if u could do the same for this image to Mullum Malarum. Because I can't understand the procedure of uploading certain images. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 05:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man my net is not working right, I'll get back to ya but I cannot tell when, can it please wait? Please? Soham 15:34, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I've already uploaded it as this, but am not sure whether it is fair what i did. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:40, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Man everything is fine except for two things - You've copied and the fact that its huge, low-res needed! Soham 16:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gender in English edit?

Hi,

I found a source for the edit I made: http://www.wisegeek.org/why-are-boats-called-she.htm

It also says that the origins are unclear, speculating that it could also be reverence for the woman the boat is named after (my edit only said that it was due to the Romance languages, which had "boat" as a female object). So rather than restoring my original edit, I'd prefer to add these two items, for greater clarity.

Thoughts? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.169.172 (talk) 10:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me the title of the article? Soham 15:34, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"controversy" sections make bad encyclopedia articles

I am not sure what your question actually is, but if you are wondering why I placed the tag that recommends "controversy" sections be deprecated and the content merged into other portions of the article as appropriate into a "controversy" section, it is because policies suggest that "controversy" sections make bad articles at least in part because unless the sources specifically identify the happenings as "controversies" Wikipedia editors should not be doing so and that as stand alone sections they bring a highlighted focus onto items that probably do not deserve to be highlighted and are more appropriately covered in the normal context of the article (and if they do not fit anywhere, it is likely that they are not actually relevant enough to the subject to be included at all) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Film Fan again

Hi Soham. A while ago, Film Fan's sock added this edit to the article for Young & Beautiful. Now he's back under an IP address adding back the same info. I had the page protected for a few days, but he's returned straight away to edit war (again). Is there anything you recommend? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - will do. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:07, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. Please see this and my latest comment (dated 13:40, 15 December 2013) about another potential FF sock. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You protect the pages from my edits, not because there is anything wrong with my edits, but because you have a personal vendetta against me. It's pathetic. I will restore those edits in mid-January, not because I hold a grudge against you--which I don't--but because they should be there, and they are helpful to regular users. 82.132.222.244 (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TIGER Soham 16:34, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to tell you that the file you uploaded File:The Hobbit film series logo.svg was in black and white. Was this specifically done by you? The previous image File:TheHobbit.png in colour is preferred.--2nyte (talk) 12:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was, do you want it the previous way? Soham 15:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please.--2nyte (talk) 13:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User Mahesh 1976

I believe User Mahesh 1976 is an employee at http://www.chennaivision.com and is trying to promote that website here, although its reliability is questionable. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 08:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League Talk Page Notice

Dear Soham, A big hello from Wikiproject Bangladesh Premier League. We have a discussion going on at project's talkpage. Due to inactivity and problems this discussion is inactive for more than 1 months. Now we heartily request you to come and share your thinkings. Your arrival and thinking is much needed for us and we'll really appreciate it if you come and give us some of your precious times. Thanks in advance. Pratyya (Hello!) (Project Co-ordinator) and Sourov0000 (talk) (Project Vice Co-ordinator) 12:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Soham, Have you seen this film? In my word it's an awesome film. In my rating it's 11/10--Pratyya (Hello!) 12:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I watched it too! In StarJalsha Movies a couple of days back, on Sunday to be exact! As a matter of fact I did'n't like it as the original story by Shirshendu Mukherjee was tampered with a lot! Just finished my latest article - User:Soham/Malang. Can you go through it? Soham 13:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey it's great. I really like it. By the way the exact time is 15 December 9:00 (IST).--Pratyya (Hello!) 13:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any shortcomings? On the other hand I was referring to the exact day, had it been time 15 December 9:00 (IST) would be pinpoint! Soham 13:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Vanished user 6393699. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui  13:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Vanished user 6393699. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui  13:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Philosophers-promotional-poster.jpg

File:Philosophers-promotional-poster.jpg

Hi, can you tell me what is the source of this new poster, I mean where did you obtain it and why it does not have the name of the film on it? I mean there is no mention of The Philosophers on it anywhere and you didn't add your source also.--Jockzain (talk) 16:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Nevermind Jockzain, my source is impawards. There is no mention of philosophers because its also known by the alternate name The Philosophers. Therefore After the Dark = The Philosophers. Soham 17:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for troubling you, I found the source and also found that the name of the movie is changed from The Philosophers to After the Dark. I added the source and moved film page to After the Dark. And thanks for adding the new poster, regards--Jockzain (talk) 17:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PERM

Hi. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but requests for permissions are strictly speaking an admin-only area and non admin comments are rarely helpful Admins do all the background research themselves anyway. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'll keep that in mind. Thanks for the heads up. Soham 13:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I have seen in some of your edits, such as a recent one on Dhoom 3, examples of Wikipedia:Citation overkill. When one good quality citation is sufficient, four or five are not wanted. BollyJeff | talk 13:46, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There you go officer, I removed the sub-par ones, kept the news dailies. Soham 13:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, well there are still many other instances in the article with multiple sources that say the same thing. BollyJeff | talk 14:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They might be added by others, do you intend a for the article? I am keen on collaborating. Soham 14:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No I don't for now. It was just on my watchlist for some reason and I noticed this. One other nitpick I have is the use of super long ref names. Please keep it simple. I had to do a lot of rework on Sholay to your 3D edits based on multiple sources and confusing ref names that were the same as the article names. If you could try to follow the existing citation styles when you edit new articles it would be greatly appreciated, thanks. BollyJeff | talk 14:45, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I've taken note of that. Happy editing. Soham 14:48, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dhoom 3

In case u may try to take Dhoom 3 to GA status in the near future, I found one useful source I feel u would like to add. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 10:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which portion of that is useful? Why not you add it? Let it be a team work, not a singular effort. Soham 10:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's actions are strange. He's removing your comments and edit warring constantly. Can you please report him to an admin. Thanks. Fideliosr (talk) 12:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Let me give him a warning first. Soham (talk) 12:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Vanished user 6393699. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Boro taxi.
Message added 17:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Matty.007 17:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Award

The Editor's Barnstar
For your extraordinary efforts! Sincerely, Fideliosr (talk) 13:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advance wishes

Advance wishes
Merry Xmas and Happy New Year! I prefer to spend the vacation travelling, and I will not be editing till the end of 2013 due to travel. But anyway, have a blast! -- Kailash29792 (talk) 13:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Same to you mate, we'll both have a blast! Soham (talk) 13:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas

Happy Yuletides!

Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!)

Film Fan. 92.22.122.213 (talk) 13:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

"Can't retire". LMAO! Merry Christmas and New Year to you too!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas wishes

Hi Soham, thanks for the Christmas message; Merry Christmas to you, too! :D At the same time, in respect to one of the headers at the top of this page, I am sorry for your loss. I hope you'll be okay. Best. Acalamari 15:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying my best. Soham (talk) 17:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Malang (song)

Harrias talk 01:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Archived main page. Soham (talk) 05:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well-deserved! ... And rightly timed. —ШαмıQ @ 09:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

JianhuiMobile talk 07:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greetings

Merry Christmas and Prosperous '14 !!!
May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2014.

Happy editing,
Herald talk with me

Thanks and sty. Soham (talk) 07:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jai Ho (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas

TitoDutta 17:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas
Thankyou! May the season bring a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and your kin ~ benzband (talk) 18:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Also have a very Happy New Year! - Jayadevp13 06:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas bro!! --Diannaa (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sholay

I don't think it needs any pictures for the 3D section. You will notice that there are no screen shots from the film currently. That's because the bar is very high for including non-free content on wikipedia articles. As of now there is not compelling reason to illustrate the 3D version. BollyJeff | talk 12:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your tireless contribution, have a barnstar, -- TitoDutta 13:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Uh? Muchas Gracias, amigo. Which one do you find the best? Soham 13:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict) a) Where did you go from chat? I tried to reply and my Firefox crashed (now I am going too buy singara, I'll return after 15 mins b) You are using Samkaran font. I used it in some pages in Wikipedia (mostly in images and not texts because the people who don't have the font installed will not be ale to see it. And most people don't have that font. --TitoDutta 13:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • a) I returned to watching TBBT s07. b)I'll put up a big warning for those who don't have samarkan. I got it from Dharmadhyaksha, actually I liked the type face since I seen it before and kinda liked it but I did'n't knew the name. Soham 13:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is TBBT? And what is Planet Herald? --TitoDutta 13:34, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Never heard of it. I recently watched Dhoom 3. Its plot section (of out Wikipedia article needs improvement). Our Wiki article says Aamir's father in the film was killed, actually in the film he committed suicide. Want to watch Chander Pahar. Have you seen Back to the Future series? I recently watched those. Magnificent.
    You may read this article. The title might be interesting. --TitoDutta 13:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • BTTF, I don't quite remember, maybe I watched one film out of the trilogy. I follow Dharmadhyaksha's talk page and have seen the page. Interesting... Soham 13:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Back to the Future trilogy is in my top 5 of greatest films ever made :-]♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
James Bond. What are the others?Soham 11:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome. The Back to the Future films are my favourites, the first one being the most.--Jionpedia 18:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark help

Can you help with removing the watermark here? File:Chandni-cover-small.jpg -- Sriram speak up 05:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Also, can you remove the site logo for File:Donga Ramudu.jpg. One of the images here might be helpful. -- Sriram speak up 08:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Soham 11:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do for Chandni too? Another editor have uploaded a similar image but some portions are missing along the borders. May I suggest you use the one that I uploaded and remove the WM? -- Sriram speak up 13:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, I have been cleaning up this category, Category:Images_with_watermarks. Hope you can chip in. -- Sriram speak up 13:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
May I add this too if it isn't asking too much. Again, pls use the image that I have uploaded. -- Sriram speak up 17:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I know. But, IMO the images I have uploaded are better. In the Chandni images, there are folds. And in Naaraaz, the lamination is more prominently visible. I came across these replacement images he had made even while searching for alternatives. I would have uploaded the same had you not offered to remove the WMs. The rest it upto you guys to decide. -- Sriram speak up 10:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have removed wm from the one you uploaded for Chandi, the Naaraz one is a bit difficult. I'll see to it later. Okay? Soham 11:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. No problem. No one is in a hurry. :) -- Sriram speak up 12:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANi notice

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Serious_personal_attack_against_a_teenager --TitoDutta 10:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Sure, I'll review it shortly. Just ask whenever you want anything reviewed. Can you review Givors canal for me?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I think it'll be my first one. Soham 11:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK, I was going to do it now.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, can you reserve the review at Talk:Givors canal and I'll continue :-]♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Soham 11:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Once Upon Ay Time In Mumbai Dobaara! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 11:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

We haven't crossed paths before but I saw the abuse you received and the mature way in which you have responded. Don't give up, you are a fine editor and a credit to the Wikipedia. best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 14:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, the cookie's crunchy, to my delight. No I haven't gave up on wikipedia. Soham 15:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I would be very sorry to see you driven away by a personal attack. Wikipedia needs editors like you. Deb (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated above I still haven't made my mind up and chances are very bleak that I'll give up. Thanks though. Soham 15:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

This is to wish u all the best for the GA review of Once upon a time in Mumbai dobara. Also, to cheer u up after u were harassed by Anice Mathew, who has received his punishment, and we may never see him again. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think I could do with some hot tea right now, in this chilly weekend in Kolkata. You know its never about punishment but about betterment of Wikipedia, he had potential I am disappointed whenever an editor is blocked. Thanks for the tea though. Soham 17:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar
Soham,

Sometimes, things in life like this happen, but the way you react is the deciding factor of things. You have been handling it as if you're older than 15. Don't retire and stick with it.

Your pal, Sportsguy17 (TC) 20:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes they cetainly do, If I cannot handle such minor thing here how can I cope/face harder threats in real-life? Thats why I never gave the matter much importance, you see my mentor Titodutta filed the ANi notice. I just went to the last blocking admin. Soham 17:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mate, after I replied to you I saw this attempt to troll me here by vandal. Soham 18:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League Talk Page Notice

Dear Soham, we have a very important discussion going on project's talkpage. Please join there. You arrival and thinking will be very useful for the project and it's articles. Thanks in advance. Pratyya (Hello!) (Project Co-ordinator) and Sourov0000 (talk) (Project Vice Co-ordinator) 07:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Sorry for messaging you this much. But we have an important discussion going on and it'll be very good if most of the project members come here and discuss. Thank you for understanding.[reply]

Trianon

Everyone knows that Hungary lost the war and was defeated in WW1. You need sources for the word "defeated"?2QW4 (talk) 14:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds perfect! 2QW4 (talk) 14:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker)The sentence was grammatically incorrect.Flat Out let's discuss it 14:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Vanished user 6393699. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Matty.007 14:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your endless contributions to stop vandalism (just like me), a barnstar for you! Jionpedia 17:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Jion, wish you'll come back one day. Soham 17:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

So 2013 ended with many ups and downs, starting from the release of blockbuster movies, new OSs, gadgets, cars and bikes, improve in social networking etc to meeting new friends, improving our editing skills, forming new groups.

But it also brought sad movements like the death of Paul Walker, Nelson Mandela to Cyclones like Phailin, Haiyan etc.

Finally, I'd like to conclude that several ups and downs are must in every year but we must be fearless and have faith in divine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2014.

By

Himanis Das (Talk, Facebook me, Tweet me) 17:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year 2014!