Talk:Emma Green (athlete)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Athletics Mid‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Medal removed?

Why was the entry athlets where e.g. Kajsa Bergqvist competed in 1993 and Carolina Klüft in 1995. One can find result information here. -- Jugalator 09:35, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

Emma Green Tregaro

That's her real name, article should be renamed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.1.14.151 (talk) 10:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emma's rainbow nail varnish gesture:

I'm very sorry to say that what is likely to become an iconic image of Emma's protest owned by Getty Images and uploaded as a thumbnail image to her article as fair use of an historical image as established in US case law has nevertheless been speedily deleted by Diannaa (talk). You can find my remarks specifically about the image here and my obsrvations about Wikipedia's policy here on my Talk page.

I would encourage anyone with a free image (i.e. an image in the public domain or owned by you) to upload it. You can email me on my Talk page (use the Toolbox on the left) if you need help. Elissa Rubria Honoria (talk) 02:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Emma Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 January 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a consensus that this athlete is not the primary topic for "Emma Green". Jenks24 (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Green (athlete) → Emma Green – The athlete is the primary subject, and clearly so compared to Emma Green (nurse) which has no incoming links and is a borderline notability case. The athlete is among the world's best high jumpers of her generation. SFB 19:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The nominator makes a good case. Brother Twisted (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. WP:TWODABS seems appropriate. Calidum T|C 00:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per above. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Upon closer review, neither of them seem particular primary, so the DAB should probably remain as is. Neither of Emma Greens have received ANY pageviews in the 90 days prior to this move request. Google results are a mess with results depending on how you search. But again, if the athlethe has no pageviews in 90 days it really says something about how much people are looking, or not looking for her on WP. That being said, Emma Green has been viewed a moderate amount of times in the last 90 days, and it appears nobody is following that to either the athlete or the nurse, so perhaps IIO is onto something with Emma Edwards Green. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose firstly the RM is malformed Emma Green is a dab page. "Emma Green" seal of Idaho. Also it looks like the seal designer should be at Emma Green (painter). Secondly GBooks shows umpteen Emma Greens. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@In ictu oculi: However it seems that Emma Edwards Green is her full name, so Emma Green wouldn't be her title, and I don't believe her notability is enough to be considered a PRIMARYREDIRECT.

Oppose per In ictu oculi. Emma Edwards Green was the only woman to design a U.S. state seal. St Anselm (talk) 09:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nominator @Sillyfolkboy: asserts Emma Green (athlete) is the "primary subject" -- presumably because she is "among the best high jumpers of her generation". Well 19th Century Emma Green (nurse) is known long past her generation. I think this claim is an example of one of the WP:Arguments to avoid -- IDONTLIKEIT. Nominator's assertion that the new article had no incoming links was true when they requested this move, almost immediately after the new article was created. That's certainly false now.
With regard to notability, no offense to our nominator, but IMO, their borderline claim suggests they haven't yet learned how to effectively research who is and isn't notable. For historic figures, like the 19th Century Emma Green, recent newspaper articles aren't usually the best source. Academic papers, history books, the web pages of museums are better sources.
Note: No one is claiming their Emma Green namesake should have pride of place. Geo Swan (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - no clear indication of primacy by either subject. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emma Green (athlete). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151002000717/http://www.oppetarkiv.se/video/2367644/sportnytt to http://www.oppetarkiv.se/video/2367644/sportnytt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]