From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Zimbabwe has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Zimbabwe (Rated GA-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon Zimbabwe is within the scope of WikiProject Zimbabwe, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Africa / Zimbabwe (Rated GA-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Zimbabwe (marked as Top-importance).
WikiProject Countries (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.5 (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

"Unrecognised state"[edit]

There is no such thing. A state exists, or it doesn't exist. This one did. It is irrelevant whether (for example) a corrupt talking shop such as the UN happened to dislike it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

You are not correct; when a group of people proclaim a new state to exist in a geographic area, the recognition of their attempt by other states, and by the people in the geographic area, are key to whether it will come into existence and remain in existence. The American Colonies declared independence, then fought a war and won, then the confederate "states" declared their independence and fought a war and lost. Israel declared a state and fought a series of wars. Eritrea proclaimed a state... I could go on. Your claim that those states existed or did not exist at each point in time is not a reflection of reality, there are grey areas and there are birthing pains. Long after the fact you can look back and say "well it happened on this day", but you might be celebrating as statehood what other people call a beer hall putsch. (talk) 18:49, 12 December 2014 (UTC)


Not entirely comfortable with this approach:

  1. What's the guideline - is this article too long?
  2. We are losing and awful lot of material here. If removal is appropriate then the material removed should be put into the relevant articles History of Zimbabwe etc., rather than just deleting.
  3. Some material is removed as unsourced. This is wrong - it should be tagged so editors can run around and find the sources and only removed if no-one finds a source after the tag is in place for a reasonable period of time.

I'm far from convinced that this pruning is the right approach, but would rather discuss than revert. Babakathy (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

  1. The article is longish. See WP:SIZERULE; the current prose size is 61kb, anything over 60 kB falls under "probably should be divided". The pre-cuts version was 71 kB.
  2. There is already a lot of unsourced material at History of Zimbabwe, especially about the recent history, which was all I summarised (the pre-1980 years were untouched), so adding more would not improve either article.
  3. WP:V says it pretty clearly - any unsourced material may be removed. If you look at History of Zimbabwe, there are 'citation needed' tags going back to 2007, and keeping a country-level article in those conditions for so long is inappropriate in my opinion.
Having said that, if you feel I have removed something that was important to the article, I'm willing to find sources for it and add it back, if you tell me what it is.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 14:36, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Further reply on your talk page, since this seems a broader issue. Babakathy (talk) 06:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

The map in the sidebar showing Zimbabwe's location in Africa versus its location in the African Union has got to be one of the stupidest Wikipedifications that I've seen in a looong time. Did some turkey go off and do this to every African country? ... off to investigate, shaking head sadly. (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

What's stupid about it? --Katangais (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Just tell where it is in Africa. The separate fact that there is an African Union which is most of Africa except Morocco withdrew from it and Central African Republic has been suspended is entirely unrelated to every other African country. It's pedantic and distracting. (talk) 03:36, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Zimbabwean Bond Coins.[edit]

The Zimbabwean Bond Coins are now in circulation, therefore, this should be listed in the currency information - ( (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC))

The Life Expectancy Figure for Zimbabwe is outdated[edit]

Under the demographics section on the Zimbabwe article, it says

"According to the United Nations World Health Organisation, the life expectancy for men was 37 years and the life expectancy for women was 34 years of age, the lowest in the world in 2006."

I am not disputing that this was true in 2006, but now it is 2015 and many new life expectancy estimates have been made, but the 2006 figure still remains. On the List of countries by life expectancy article, there are 4 different life expectancy estimates from the years 2009-2012; the figures on this page are updated but life expectancy figure on the main page on Zimbabwe remains the same. All of the four estimates have a higher life expectancy and some are a considerable increase from 2006; is this not enough to at least update the life expectancy figure?

In 2012 the WHO's life expectancy estimate for Zimbabweans from birth was 56 years for males and 60 years for females.[1]

In 2012 the World Bank had a life expectancy estimate of 58 years[2] (it didn't specify whether it was male or female so it can be assumed to be an average for males and females).

I don't know who will, but someone does need to update the life expectancy figure on the Zimbabwe page as it is outdated.


Jesus is King of Kings (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Go for it. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Where is Canaan Banana?[edit]

Isn't it strange that Canaan Banana (the first president of Zimbabwe, 1980-1987) is not mentioned anywhere in this article? Does anyone know what's up with this? Michellecornelison (talk) 03:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Well spotted - and now fixed. Thanks. Selector99 (talk) 06:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! I don't know much on this subject...I just noticed it while reading, so I wasn't totally confident about writing that in. -Michellecornelison (talk) 06:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 15 external links on Zimbabwe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Zimbabwe as racially diverse[edit]

Zimbabwe as a racially diverse nation is a joke! Please remove any and all references to the government and/or people of Zimbabwe being racially diverse. The black African nationalist did not fight the bush war for racial equality, they fought it to force their rule! Mugabe and all the rest have shown the racist tactics stealing land from white Africans, black African nationalist refuse to believe Africans can be white. Whites are beat & killed for property, money and for just being white (look at crime stats, while at it YouTube street views of cities in Zimbabwe and count the other races) Mugabe, Zimbabwe government officials in power continue to express racist viewpoints that would make Hitler blush but yet this country continues to receive everything from the outside countries and the UN but those goods and things never get past the corrupt Zimbabwian government! ps this isn't the only racist black African ruled country in Africa! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C4:C301:1DB4:793B:C1DC:49A3:842A (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. ^ "WHO - Zimbabwe". Retrieved 17 January 2015. 
  2. ^ "World Bank - Zimbabwe". Retrieved 17 January 2015.