Page protected with pending changes level 1

Typography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Typographical principle)
Jump to: navigation, search
A specimen sheet of the Trajan typeface, which is based on the letter forms of capitalis monumentalis or Roman square capitals used for the inscription at the base of Trajan's Column, from which the typeface takes its name
Movable type being assembled on a composing stick using pieces that are stored in the type case shown below it

Typography is the art and technique of arranging type to make written language readable, appealing, and legible when displayed. The arrangement of type involves selecting typefaces, point size, line length, line-spacing (leading), letter-spacing (tracking), and adjusting the space within letters pairs (kerning[1]). Type design is a closely related craft, sometimes considered part of typography; most typographers do not design typefaces, and some type designers do not consider themselves typographers.[2][3] In modern times, typography has been put in film, television, and online broadcasts to add emotion to communication.[4][unreliable source?]

Typography is the work of typesetters, compositors, typographers, graphic designers, art directors, manga artists, comic book artists, graffiti artists, clerical workers, and everyone else who arranges graphics for a product. Until the Digital Age, typography was a specialized occupation. Digitization opened up typography to new generations of visual designers and lay users, and David Jury, head of graphic design at Colchester Institute in England, states that "typography is now something everybody does."[5]

History[edit]

A revolving type case for wooden type in China, an illustration shown in a book published in 1313 by Wang Zhen
Korean movable type from 1377 used for the Jikji

Typography, from the Greek words τύπος typos "form" or "impression" and γράφειν graphein "to write", traces its origins to the first punches and dies used to make seals and currency in ancient times. The uneven spacing of the impressions on brick stamps found in the Mesopotamian cities of Uruk and Larsa, dating from the second millennium B.C., may be evidence of type, wherein the reuse of identical characters was applied to create cuneiform text.[6] Babylonian cylinder seals were used to create an impression on a surface by rolling the seal on wet clay.[7] Typography also was implemented in the Phaistos Disc, an enigmatic Minoan printed item from Crete, which dates to between 1850 and 1600 B.C.[8][9][10] It has been proposed that Roman lead pipe inscriptions were created with movable type printing,[11][12][13] but German typographer Herbert Brekle recently dismissed this view.[14]

The essential criterion of type identity was met by medieval print artifacts such as the Latin Pruefening Abbey inscription of 1119 that was created by the same technique as the Phaistos disc.[8][15][16][17] The silver altarpiece of patriarch Pellegrinus II (1195−1204) in the cathedral of Cividale was printed with individual letter punches.[18][19][20] Apparently, the same printing technique may be found in tenth to twelfth century Byzantine reliquaries.[18][19] Other early examples include individual letter tiles where the words are formed by assembling single letter tiles in the desired order, which were reasonably widespread in medieval Northern Europe.[8][16]

Typography with movable type was invented in eleventh-century China by Bi Sheng (990–1051) during the Song dynasty.[21] His movable type system was manufactured from ceramic materials, and clay type printing continued to be practiced in China until the Qing Dynasty.

Wang Zhen was one of the pioneers of wooden movable type. Although the wooden type was more durable under the mechanical rigors of handling. Repeated printing wore the character faces down and the types could be replaced only by carving new pieces.[22]

Metal movable type was first invented in Korea during the Goryeo Dynasty, approximately 1230. Hua Sui introduced bronze type printing to China in 1490 AD. The diffusion of both movable-type systems was limited and the technology did not spread beyond East and Central Asia, however.[23]

A sixteenth century workshop in Germany showing a printing press and many of the activities involved in the process of printing

Modern lead-based movable type, along with the mechanical printing press, is most often attributed to the goldsmith Johannes Gutenberg in 1439.[24][25][26][27] His type pieces, made from a lead-based alloy, suited printing purposes so well that the alloy is still used today.[28] Gutenberg developed specialized techniques for casting and combining cheap copies of letter punches in the vast quantities required to print multiple copies of texts.[29] This technical breakthrough was instrumental in starting the Printing Revolution and the first book printed with lead-based movable type was the Gutenberg Bible.

Rapidly advancing technology revolutionized typography in the latter twentieth century. During the 1960s some camera-ready typesetting could be produced in any office or workshop with stand-alone machines such as those introduced by IBM. During the mid-1980s personal computers such as the Macintosh allowed type designers to create typefaces digitally using commercial graphic design software. Digital technology also enabled designers to create more experimental typefaces as well as the practical typefaces of traditional typography. Designs for typefaces could be created faster with the new technology, and for more specific functions.[7] The cost for developing typefaces was drastically lowered, becoming widely available to the masses. The change has been called the "democratization of type" and has given new designers more opportunities to enter the field.[30]

Evolution[edit]

The design of typefaces has developed alongside the development of typesetting systems.[31] Although typography has evolved significantly from its origins, it is a largely conservative art that tends to cleave closely to tradition.[32] This is because legibility is paramount, and so the typefaces that are the most readable usually are retained. In addition, the evolution of typography is inextricably intertwined with lettering by hand and related art forms, especially formal styles, which thrived for centuries preceding typography,[32] and so the evolution of typography must be discussed with reference to this relationship.

In the nascent stages of European printing, the typeface (blackletter, or Gothic) was designed in imitation of the popular hand-lettering styles of scribes.[33] Initially, this typeface was difficult to read, because each letter was set in place individually and made to fit tightly into the allocated space.[34] The art of manuscript writing, whose origin was during Hellenistic and Roman bookmaking, reached its zenith in the illuminated manuscripts of the Middle Ages. Metal typefaces notably altered the style, making it "crisp and uncompromising", and also brought about "new standards of composition".[32] during the Renaissance period in France, Claude Garamond was partially responsible for the adoption of Roman typeface that eventually supplanted the more commonly-used Gothic (blackletter).[35] Roman typeface also was based on hand-lettering styles.[36]

The development of Roman typeface may be traced back to Greek lapidary letters. Greek lapidary letters were carved into stone and "one of the first formal uses of Western letterforms"; after that, Roman lapidary letterforms evolved into the monumental capitals, which laid the foundation for Western typographical design, especially serif typefaces.[35] There are two styles of Roman typefaces: the old style, and the modern. The former is characterized by its similarly-weighted lines, while the latter is distinguished by its contrast of light and heavy lines.[33] Often, these styles are combined.

By the twentieth century, computers turned typeface design into a rather simplified process. This has allowed the number of typefaces and styles to proliferate exponentially, as there now are thousands available.[33] Unfortunately, confusion between typeface and font (the various styles of a single typeface) occurred in 1984 when Steve Jobs mislabeled typefaces as fonts for Apple computers and his error has been perpetuated throughout the computer industry, leading to common misuse by the public of the term "font" when typeface is the proper term.

Experimental typeface uses[edit]

"Experimental typography" is defined as the unconventional and more artistic approach to typeface selection. Francis Picabia was a Dada pioneer of this practice in the early twentieth Century. David Carson is often associated with this movement, particularly for his work in Ray Gun magazine in the 1990s. His work caused an uproar in the design community due to his abandonment of standard practices in typeface selection, layout, and design. Experimental typography is said to place emphasis on expressing emotion, rather than having a concern for legibility while communicating ideas, hence considered bordering on being art.

Scope[edit]

In contemporary use, the practice and study of typography is very broad, covering all aspects of letter design and application, both mechanical (typesetting, type design, and typefaces) and manual (handwriting and calligraphy). Typographical elements may appear in a wide variety of situations, including:

Since digitization, typographical uses have spread to a wider range of applications, appearing on web pages, LCD mobile phone screens, and hand-held video games.

Text typefaces[edit]

A specimen sheet by William Caslon shows printed examples of Roman typefaces

Traditionally, text is composed to create a readable, coherent, and visually satisfying typeface that works invisibly, without the awareness of the reader. Even distribution of typeset material, with a minimum of distractions and anomalies, is aimed at producing clarity and transparency.

Choice of typeface(s) is the primary aspect of text typography—prose fiction, non-fiction, editorial, educational, religious, scientific, spiritual, and commercial writing all have differing characteristics and requirements of appropriate typefaces (and their fonts or styles). For historic material, established text typefaces frequently are chosen according to a scheme of historical genre acquired by a long process of accretion, with considerable overlap among historical periods.

Contemporary books are more likely to be set with state-of-the-art "text romans" or "book romans" typefaces with serifs and design values echoing present-day design arts, which are closely based on traditional models such as those of Nicolas Jenson, Francesco Griffo (a punchcutter who created the model for Aldine typefaces), and Claude Garamond. With their more specialized requirements, newspapers and magazines rely on compact, tightly-fitted styles of text typefaces with serifs specially designed for the task, which offer maximum flexibility, readability, legibility, and efficient use of page space. Sans serif text typefaces (without serifs) often are used for introductory paragraphs, incidental text, and whole short articles. A current fashion is to pair a sans-serif typeface for headings with a high-performance serif typeface of matching style for the text of an article.

Typesetting conventions are modulated by orthography and linguistics, word structures, word frequencies, morphology, phonetic constructs and linguistic syntax. Typesetting conventions also are subject to specific cultural conventions. For example, in French it is customary to insert a non-breaking space before a colon (:) or semicolon (;) in a sentence, while in English it is not.

Color[edit]

Main article: Type color

In typesetting, color is the overall density of the ink on the page, determined mainly by the typeface, but also by the word spacing, leading, and depth of the margins.[37] Text layout, tone, or color of the set text, and the interplay of text with the white space of the page in combination with other graphic elements impart a "feel" or "resonance" to the subject matter. With printed media, typographers also are concerned with binding margins, paper selection, and printing methods when determining the correct color of the page.

Principles of the craft[edit]

Legibility is primarily the concern of the typeface designer, to ensure that each individual character or glyph is unambiguous and distinguishable from all other characters in the typeface. In part, legibility also is an aspect of concern for the typographer to assure selection of a typeface with appropriate clarity of design for the intended use at the intended size. An example of a well-known design, Brush Script, contains a number of illegible letters, since many of the characters easily may be misread, especially if seen out of textual context. Selection of case, upper (capitals) or lower, severely influences the legibility of typography because using "all-caps" (only upper case letters) significantly reduces legibility.

Readability is primarily the concern of the typographer or information designer. It is the intended result of the complete process of presentation of textual material in order to communicate meaning as unambiguously as possible. A reader should be assisted in navigating through the information with ease, by optimal inter-letter, inter-word, and particularly, inter-line spacing, coupled with appropriate line length and position on the page, careful editorial "chunking", and choice of the text architecture of titles, folios, and reference links. Case, whether capital or lower case may be pivotal, given the loss of legibility with the use of all-caps, however, frequent use of that style implies that many designers are unaware of the issue.

Text typeset example in Iowan Old Style roman, italics, and small caps, optimized at approximately ten words per line, typeface sized at 14 points on 1.4 × leading, with 0.2 points extra tracking using an extract of an essay by Oscar Wilde The English Renaissance of Art c. 1882

The two concepts are distinguished by Walter Tracy in Letters of Credit: these ‘two aspects of a type’ are

fundamental to its effectiveness. Because the common meaning of "legible" is "readable" there are those – even some professionally involved in typography – who think that the term "legibility" is all that is needed in any discussion on the effectiveness of types. However, legibility and readability are separate, though connected aspects of type. Properly understood… the two terms can help to describe the character and function of type more precisely than legibility alone. … In typography we need to draw the definition… of legibility… to mean the quality of being decipherable and recognisable – so that we can say, for example, that the lowercase h in a particular old style italic is not legible in small sizes because its in-turned leg makes it look like the letter b; or a figure 3 in a classified advertisement is too similar to the 8. … In display sizes, legibility ceases to be a serious matter; a character that causes uncertainty at 8 point size is plain enough at 24 point.[38]

Note that the above applies to people with 20/20 vision, at appropriate reading distance, and under optimal lighting. The analogy of an opticians chart, testing for visual acuity and independent of meaning, is useful to indicate the scope of the concept of legibility.

In typography… if the columns of a newspaper or magazine or the pages of a book can be read for many minutes at a time without strain or difficulty, then we can say the type has good readability. The term describes the quality of visual comfort – an important requirement in the comprehension of long stretches of text but, paradoxically, not so important in such things as telephone directories or air-line time-tables, where the reader is not reading continuously but searching for a single item of information. The difference in the two aspects of visual effectiveness is illustrated by the familiar argument on the suitability of sans-serif types for text setting. The characters in a particular sans-serif face may be perfectly legible in themselves, but no one would think of setting a popular novel in it because its readability is low.[38]

Legibility ‘refers to perception’ (being able to see as determined by physical limitations of the eye) and readability ‘refers to comprehension’ (understanding the meaning).[38] Good typographers and graphic designers aim to achieve excellence in both.

"The typeface chosen should be legible. That is, it should be read without effort. Sometimes legibility is simply a matter of type size; more often, however, it is a matter of typeface design. Case selection always influences legibility. In general, typefaces that are true to the basic letterforms are more legible than typefaces that have been condensed, expanded, embellished, or abstracted.

However, even a legible typeface can become unreadable through poor setting and placement, just as a less legible typeface can be made more readable through good design.[39]

Studies of both legibility and readability have examined a wide range of factors including type size and type design. For example, comparing serif vs. sans-serif type, roman type vs. oblique type, and italic type, line length, line spacing, color contrast, the design of right-hand edge (for example, justification, straight right hand edge) vs. ragged right, and whether text is hyphenated. Justified copy must be adjusted tightly during typesetting to prevent loss of readability, something beyond the capabilities of typical personal computers.

Legibility research has been published since the late nineteenth century. Although there often are commonalities and agreement on many topics, others often create poignant areas of conflict and variation of opinion. For example, Alex Poole asserts that no one has provided a conclusive answer as to which typeface style, serif or sans serif, provides the most legibility,[40][unreliable source?] although differences of opinion exist regarding such debates. Other topics such as justified vs unjustified type, use of hyphens, and proper typefaces for people with reading difficulties such as dyslexia, have continued to be subjects of debate.

Legibility is usually measured through speed of reading, with comprehension scores used to check for effectiveness (that is, not a rushed or careless read). For example, Miles Tinker, who published numerous studies from the 1930s to the 1960s, used a speed of reading test that required participants to spot incongruous words as an effectiveness filter.

The Readability of Print Unit at the Royal College of Art under Professor Herbert Spencer with Brian Coe and Linda Reynolds[41] did important work in this area and was one of the centres that revealed the importance of the saccadic rhythm of eye movement for readability—in particular, the ability to take in (i.e., recognise the meaning of groups of) about three words at once and the physiognomy of the eye, which means the eye tires if the line required more than 3 or 4 of these saccadic jumps. More than this is found to introduce strain and errors in reading (e.g. Doubling). The use of all-caps renders words indistinguishable as groups, all letters presenting a uniform line to the eye, requiring special effort for separation and understanding.

These days, legibility research tends to be limited to critical issues, or the testing of specific design solutions (for example, when new typefaces are developed). Examples of critical issues include typefaces for people with visual impairment, typefaces and case selection for highway and street signs, or for other conditions where legibility may make a key difference.

Much of the legibility research literature is somewhat atheoretical—various factors were tested individually or in combination (inevitably so, as the different factors are interdependent), but many tests were carried out in the absence of a model of reading or visual perception. Some typographers believe that the overall word shape (Bouma) is very important in readability, and that the theory of parallel letterwise recognition is either wrong, less important, or not the entire picture. Word shape differs by outline, influenced by ascending and descending elements of lower case letters and enables reading the entire word without having to parse out each letter (for example, dog is easily distinguished from cat) and that becomes more influential to being able to read groups of words at a time.

Studies distinguishing between Bouma recognition and parallel letterwise recognition with regard to how people recognize words when they read, have favored parallel letterwise recognition, which is widely accepted by cognitive psychologists.[citation needed]

Some commonly agreed findings of legibility research include:[citation needed]

  • Text set in lower case is more legible than text set all in upper case (capitals, all-caps), presumably because lower case letter structures and word shapes are more distinctive.
  • Extenders (ascenders, descenders, and other projecting parts) increase salience (prominence).
  • Regular upright type (roman type) is found to be more legible than italic type.
  • Contrast, without dazzling brightness, also has been found to be important, with black on yellow/cream being most effective along with white on blue.
  • Positive images (e.g. black on white) make handheld material easier to read than negative or reversed (e.g. white on black). Even this commonly accepted practice has some exceptions, however, for example in some cases of disability,[42][unreliable source?] and designing the most effective signs for drivers.
  • The upper portions of letters (ascenders) play a stronger part in the recognition process than the lower portions.
Text typeset using LaTeX digital typesetting software showing unconventional double spacing after a period, a frequent carryover among novices to typesetting who mistakenly use the spacing convention of typewriters

Readability also may be compromised by letter-spacing, word spacing, or leading that is too tight or too loose. It may be improved when generous vertical space separates lines of text, making it easier for the eye to distinguish one line from the next, or previous line. Poorly designed typefaces and those that are too tightly or loosely fitted also may result in poor legibility. Underlining also may reduce readability by eliminating the recognition effect contributed by the descending elements of letters.

Periodical publications, especially newspapers and magazines, use typographical elements to achieve an attractive, distinctive appearance, to aid readers in navigating the publication, and in some cases for dramatic effect. By formulating a style guide, a publication or periodical standardizes with a relatively small collection of typefaces, each used for specific elements within the publication, and makes consistent use of typefaces, case, type sizes, italic, boldface, colors, and other typographic features such as combining large and small capital letters together. Some publications, such as The Guardian and The Economist, go so far as to commission a type designer to create customized typefaces for their exclusive use.

Different periodical publications design their publications, including their typography, to achieve a particular tone or style. For example, USA Today uses a bold, colorful, and comparatively modern style through their use of a variety of typefaces and colors; type sizes vary widely, and the newspaper's name is placed on a colored background. In contrast, The New York Times uses a more traditional approach, with fewer colors, less typeface variation, and more columns.

Especially on the front page of newspapers and on magazine covers, headlines often are set in larger display typefaces to attract attention, and are placed near the masthead.

Display graphics[edit]

Nineteenth century wanted poster for John Wilkes Booth (the assassin of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln) printed with lead and woodcut type, and incorporating photography

Type may be combined with negative space and images, forming relationships and dialog between the words and images for special effects. Display designs are a potent element in graphic design. Some sign designers exhibit less concern for readability, sacrificing it for an artistic manner. Color and size of type elements may be much more prevalent than in solely text designs. Most display items exploit type at larger sizes, where the details of letter design are magnified. Color is used for its emotional effect in conveying the tone and nature of subject matter.

Display typography encompasses:

Advertising[edit]

Typography has long been a vital part of promotional material and advertising. Designers often use typefaces to set a theme and mood in an advertisement; for example using bold, large text to convey a particular message to the reader.[43] Choice of typeface is often used to draw attention to a particular advertisement, combined with efficient use of color, shapes, and images.[44] Today, typography in advertising often reflects a company's brand. Typefaces used in advertisements convey different messages to the reader, classical ones are for a strong personality, while more modern ones may convey clean, neutral look. Bold typefaces are used for making statements and attracting attention. In any design, a balance has to be achieved between the visual impact and communication aspects.[45] Digital technology in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries has enabled the creation of typefaces for advertising that are more experimental than traditional typefaces.[30]

Inscriptional and architectural lettering[edit]

See also: Epigraphy
A display advertisement for the Encyclopædia Britannica from a 1913 issue of National Geographic magazine

The history of inscriptional lettering is intimately tied to the history of writing, the evolution of letterforms and the craft of the hand. The widespread use of the computer and various etching and sandblasting techniques today has made the hand carved monument a rarity, and the number of letter-carvers left in the US continues to dwindle.

For monumental lettering to be effective it must be considered carefully in its context. Proportions of letters need to be altered as their size and distance from the viewer increases. An expert monument designer gains understanding of these nuances through much practice and observation of the craft. Letters drawn by hand and for a specific project have the possibility of being richly specific and profoundly beautiful in the hand of a master. Each also may take up to an hour to carve,[citation needed] so it is no wonder that the automated sandblasting process has become the industry standard.

To create a sandblasted letter, a rubber mat is laser-cut from a computer file and glued to the stone. The blasted sand then bites a coarse groove or channel into the exposed surface. Unfortunately, many of the computer applications that create these files and interface with the laser cutter do not have a wide selection of many typefaces, and often have inferior versions of those typefaces that are available.[citation needed] What now can be done in minutes, however, lacks the striking architecture and geometry of the chisel-cut letter that allows light to play across its distinct interior planes.[citation needed]

See also[edit]

Supporting organizations

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Bringhurst, Robert. The Elements of Typographic Style, version 3.1. Canada: Hartley & Marks, 2005. p. 32.
  2. ^ Pipes, Alan (1997), Production For Graphic Designers (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall 
  3. ^ Berry, John D. "dot-font: Being a Typographer". CreativePro. Creative Publishing Network and CreativePro. Retrieved 7 April 2015. 
  4. ^ Blagodarskiy, Vas, Kinetic Typography and Mass Communications .
  5. ^ Jury, David (2006). What is Typography?. Mies, Switzerland: Rotovision. p. 63. ISBN 2-88046-822-1. 
  6. ^ Sass, Benjamin; Marzahn, Joachim (2010). Aramaic and Figural Stamp Impressions on Bricks of the Sixth Century B.C. from Babylon. Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 11, 20, 160. ISBN 978-3-447-06184-1. "the latter has cuneiform signs that look as if made with a movable type, and impressions from Assur display the same phenomenon 
  7. ^ a b Clair, Kate; Busic-Snyder, Cynthia (2012). A Typographic Workbook: A Primer to History, Techniques, and Artistry. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 4, 123. ISBN 978-1-118-39988-0. 
  8. ^ a b c Brekle, Herbert E (1997), "Das typographische Prinzip. Versuch einer Begriffsklärung", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German) 72: 58–63 
  9. ^ Schwartz, Benjamin (1959), "The Phaistos disk", Journal of Near Eastern Studies 18 (2): 105–12, doi:10.1086/371517 
  10. ^ Diamond, Jared, "13: Necessity's Mother: The evolution of technology", Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Society, ISBN 0-393-03891-2 
  11. ^ Lanciani, R (1975) [Classe di Scienze Morali, Rom 1881], "Topografia di Roma antica. I commentarii di Frontino intorno le acque e gli acquedotti. Silloge epigrafica aquaria" [Topography of ancient Rome. The commentaries of Frontini around the waters and the aqueducts], Memorie della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, III (in Italian) (Quasar) IV: 215–616 
  12. ^ Pace, Pietrantonio (1986), Gli acquedotti di Roma e il Aquaeductu di Frontino [The aqueducts of Rome and the aqueduct of Frontino] (in Italian) (2nd ed.), Rome: Art Studio S. Eligio 
  13. ^ Hodge, A. Trevor (1992), Roman Aqueducts & Water Supply, London: Duckworth, ISBN 0-7156-2194-7 
  14. ^ ——— (2010), "Herstellungstechniken von Inschriften auf römischen Wasserleitungsrohren aus Blei", in Hanneforth, Thomas; Fanselow, Gisbert, Language and Logos. Studies in Theoretical and Computational Linguistics, Studia grammatica 72, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 419–37, ISBN 978-3-05-004931-1 
  15. ^ ——— (2005), Die Prüfeninger Weihinschrift von 1119. Eine paläographisch-typographische Untersuchung (brief summary) (in German), Regensburg: Scriptorium Verlag für Kultur und Wissenschaft, ISBN 3-937527-06-0 
  16. ^ a b Lehmann-Haupt, Hellmut (1940), "Englische Holzstempelalphabete des XIII. Jahrhunderts", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German): 93–97 
  17. ^ Hupp, Otto (1906), "Die Prüfeninger Weiheinschrift von 1119", Studien aus Kunst und Geschichte, Festschrift für Friedrich Schneider (in German), Freiburg i. Br.: Herder 
  18. ^ a b Lipinsky, Angelo (1986), "La pala argentea del Patriarca Pellegrino nella Collegiata di Cividale e le sue iscrizioni con caratteri mobili", Ateneo Veneto (in Italian) 24: 75–80 
  19. ^ a b Koch, Walter (1994), Literaturbericht zur mittelalterlichen und neuzeitlichen Epigraphik (1985–1991), Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Hilfsmittel (in German) 14, München, p. 213, ISBN 978-3-88612-114-4 
  20. ^ ——— (2011), Die typographische Herstellungstechnik der Inschriften auf dem silbernen Altaraufsatz im Dom von Cividale (PDF) (in German), DE: Regensburg 
  21. ^ Needham, Joseph (1994). The Shorter Science and Civilisation in China, Volume 4. Cambridge University Press. p. 14. ISBN 9780521329958. Bi Sheng... who first devised, about 1045, the art of printing with movable type 
  22. ^ Tsien, Tsuen-Hsuin (1985). Paper and Printing. Needham, Joseph Science and Civilization in China:. vol. 5 part 1. Cambridge University Press. pp. 201–217. ISBN 0-521-08690-6. 
  23. ^ Ch'on 1993, p. 19.
  24. ^ McLuhan, Marshall (1962), The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man (1st ed.), University of Toronto Press, ISBN 978-0-8020-6041-9 
  25. ^ Eisenstein, Elizabeth L (1980), The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-29955-1 
  26. ^ Febvre, Lucien; Martin, Henri-Jean (1997), The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450–1800, London: Verso, ISBN 1-85984-108-2 
  27. ^ Man, John (2002), The Gutenberg Revolution: The Story of a Genius and an Invention that Changed the World, London: Headline Review, ISBN 978-0-7472-4504-9 
  28. ^ "Printing", Encyclopædia Britannica, 2006  .
  29. ^ Dowding, Geoffrey. An Introduction to the History of Printing Types. London: Oak Knoll Press, 1998. p. 3.
  30. ^ a b Rothenberg, Randall (July 23, 1990). "Computers Change the Face of Type". New York Times. 
  31. ^ Rob Carter, Ben Day, Philip B. Meggs Typographic Design: Form and Communication -- 2012 Page 125 "It is the earliest mechanization of a handicraft: the handlettering of books. Typographic design has been closely bound to the evolution of technology, for the capabilities and limitations of typesetting systems have posed constraints upon the design process."
  32. ^ a b c "Typography". Credo Reference/The Crystal Reference Encyclopedia. Credo Reference. Retrieved 2 November 2014. 
  33. ^ a b c "Type". Credo Reference/The Columbia Encyclopedia. Credo Reference. Retrieved 2 November 2014. 
  34. ^ "The Evolution of Typography" (PDF). Infoamerica. Retrieved 2 November 2014. 
  35. ^ a b Haley, Allan (2012). Typography, Referenced. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-59253-702-0. 
  36. ^ Roman type
  37. ^ Eckersley, Richard (1994), "Color", Glossary of Typesetting Terms, Chicago guides to writing, editing and publishing, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-18371-8, OCLC 316234150 
  38. ^ a b c Tracy, Walter (1986), Letters of Credit, Gordon Fraser 
  39. ^ Craig, J; Scala, IK (2006), Designing with Type, the Essential Guide to Typography (5th ed.), Watson Guptil 
  40. ^ Poole, Alex, Literature review 
  41. ^ Reynolds, Linda (1988), "Legibility of Type", Baseline 10 
  42. ^ Writing clearly, UK: National Literacy Trust 
  43. ^ Stanley, Thomas Blaine. The Technique of Advertising Production. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1940. p. 40.
  44. ^ Stanley, Thomas Blaine. The Technique of Advertising Production. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1940.
  45. ^ Glaser, C. Knight, J. When Typography Speaks Louder Than Words. April 13th, 2012.
  46. ^ Kloetzel, James E, ed. (2010), 2011 Classic Specialized Catalogue of Stamps & Cover 1840–1940 (17 ed.), Sidney, OH: Scott, p. 34A, ISBN 0-89487-455-1 

General References[edit]

  • Bringhurst, Robert (2002), The Elements of Typographic Style (2.5 ed.), Vancouver: Hartley & Marks, ISBN 0-88179-133-4 .
  • Standard Test Method of Comparative Legibility by Means of Polarizing Filter Instrumentation, ASTM International, D7298 
  • Ch'on, Hye-bong (1993), "Typography in Korea", Koreana 7 (2): 10–19 .
  • Gill, Eric (2000) [1931], An Essay on Typography, David R Godine, p. 188, ISBN 0-87923-950-6 
  • Heller, Steven; Meggs, Philip B (2001), Texts on Type: Critical Writings on Typography, New York: Allworth Press, ISBN 1-58115-082-2 . A compilation of more than fifty texts on the history, practice, and aesthetics of typeface design and typography
  • Jury, David (2004), About Face: Reviving the Rules of Typography, CH: Rotovision, ISBN 2-88046-798-5 , 159 pp.
  • Lawson, Alexander (1990), Anatomy of a Typeface, ISBN 978-0-87923-333-4 , devotes entire chapters to the development and uses of individual or small groupings of typefaces
  • Martínez de Sousa, José (2007), Manual de estilo de la lengua española [Style manual of the Spanish language] (in Spanish) (3.ª ed.), Gijón: Trea .
  • ——— (2008), Ortografía y ortotipografía del español actual [Orthography and orthotypography of current Spanish] (in Spanish) (2.ª ed.), Gijón: Trea .
  • Mestres, Josep M; Costa, Joan; Oliva, Mireia; Fité, Ricard (2009), Manual d'estil. La redacció i l'edició de textos [Style manual. The redaction & edition of texts] (in Catalan) (4a. rev. i ampl. ed.), Vic/Barcelona: Eumo/UB/UPF/Rosa Sensat .
  • Papazian, Hrant H (2000), "Improving the Tool", in Swanson, Gunnar, Graphic Design and Reading: explorations of an uneasy relationship, New York: Allworth Press, ISBN 1-58115-063-6 .
  • Pujol, JM; i Solà, Joan (2000), Ortotipografia. Manual de l'author, l'autoeditor i el dissenyador gràfic [Orthotypography. Manual of the authors, the self-editor and the graphic designer] (in Catalan) (2a rev ed.), Barcelona: Columna .
  • Swanson, Gunnar (2000), Graphic Design and Reading: explorations of an uneasy relationship, New York: Allworth Press, ISBN 1-58115-063-6 .
  • Tschichold, Jan (1991), The Form of the Book: Essays on the Morality of Good Design, Vancouver: Hartley & Marks, ISBN 978-0-88179-034-4 . A comprehensive collection of essays on the typographic art. A more classic companion to Bringhust 2002.
  • Warde, Beatrice (2000), "The Crystal Goblet, or Printing Should Be Invisible", in Swanson, Gunnar, Graphic Design and Reading: explorations of an uneasy relationship, New York: Allworth Press, ISBN 1-58115-063-6 .
  • White, Alex W (1999), Type in Use – Effective typography for electronic publishing (pbk) (2.0 ed.), New York: WW Norton & Co, ISBN 0-393-73034-4 .
  • Lexique des règles typographiques en usage à l'Imprimerie nationale [Lexic of the typographic rules used at the National press] (in French), Imprimerie nationale, 2002, ISBN 2-7433-0482-0 .

External links[edit]

  • AIGA typography – Articles and interviews relating to typography from AIGA's Voice section
  • Decode Unicode – A wiki with all 98,884 Unicode characters, including full text search capability
  • Archive.org – The Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, Typography, pp. 509–548