User talk:71.179.168.226

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Japanese New Year, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Japanese New Year was changed by 71.179.168.226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984675 on 2011-11-04T14:28:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shinkansen with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 14:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Temple of Jupiter (Pompeii) was changed by 71.179.168.226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.934211 on 2012-11-20T01:46:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Heir Apparent (novel) was changed by 71.179.168.226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912409 on 2012-11-28T19:18:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

This is your only warning. Please stop adding material about the Black-eyed Susan Book award. The material you're adding is unsourced, but, more important, it is not a notable award and should not be included in articles. It's almost the same as adding spam links, which is not permissible at Wikipedia. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same holds true for other non-notable awards and other unsourced material.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:34, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing. If you have questions about how all of this works, please post them here, and I'll try to help you.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend[edit]

Looks like you have ruffled a few feathers. Let me try to help a bit. It looks like you have been adding some material trying to help some articles out, but there are some problems with most of your edits. For instance, when you add a sentence that says someone has won an award, you have to provide a citation. Basically, a link to a newspaper story or a page in a book where you found the information. This is a rule we have on verification, and we do this so we don't have articles on people claiming to have won prizes they really didn't win, or other misleading facts. It is important that all the articles are based on solid and reliable information, so what you read can be trusted to be true.

I'm guessing you are a student and new to Wikipedia, so I would recommend starting by adding the material you wish to add to the talk page of the article, and letting someone else add it to the actual article. Just tell us the information you want added, and where you heard about it. After a while, you learn the format and style we use and you will catch on enough to help us start adding the material directly to the article, but it would be very helpful if you just added it to the talk pages while you learn.

If you have questions, you can visit The Teahouse, a section of Wikipedia with regular editors helping each other, asking and answering questions on how to do things around here. It can be confusing, I understand, but the rules are so Wikipedia will be trustworthy and easy to read, and they aren't too difficult to learn once you get started. Thanks. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 08:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: I'd Tell You I Love You, But Then I'd Have to Kill You was changed by 71.179.168.226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864922 on 2012-12-03T18:45:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Bbb23 (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ann E. Burg concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ann E. Burg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Soul Eater characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

===''Soul Eater''=== :)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Darkwind. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ruth Handler because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Darkwind (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ann E. Burg[edit]

Hello 71.179.168.226. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ann E. Burg".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ann E. Burg}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 21:02, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of To Kill a Mockingbird characters because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Nonsenseferret. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Troposphere— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. _nonsense ferret 14:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Confessions (Usher album) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 16:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jared Padalecki because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yamaguchi先生 19:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Cailin Phebus[edit]

I am the frenchiest fry. No arguments.

October 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm JungerMan Chips Ahoy!. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Blackbeard (disambiguation) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 20:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Wildthing61476. I wanted to let you know that I or someone else undid one or more of your recent contributions to Baltimore City Hall because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wildthing61476 (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baltimore City Hall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm KNHaw. An edit that you recently made to Dred Scott seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KNHaw ^(talk) 18:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm North Shoreman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dred Scott have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 18:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Andrea— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:39, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Garrison Forest School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Tati Westbrook. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]