Jump to content

User talk:Ag.abhinavgautam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... Create Draft Article please help me to create draft Draft:Abhinav Gautam Ag.abhinavgautam (talk) 10:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Successfully creating a new article is the absolute hardest task to perform on Wikipedia. It takes much time and practice. New users who dive right in to creating articles without knowing about the process and what actually goes in to articles often leads to frustration, disappointment and hurt feelings as something that they spent hours on is mercilessly edited and deleted by others. I don't want you to have bad feelings, so I urge you to spend much time editing existing articles in areas that interest you, to get a feel for how Wikipedia operates and what is expected of article content. You should also use the new user tutorial to learn more about Wikipedia.
If you still want to attempt to create a draft, please read Your first article, and visit Articles for Creation where you can begin the process.
If you are associated with the subject you want to write about, please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhinav Gautam (June 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 07:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ag.abhinavgautam! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 07:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhinav Gautam (June 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Hatchens were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Hatchens (talk) 08:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Abhinav Gautam

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Abhinav Gautam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hatchens (talk) 08:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Ag.abhinavgautam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

request to create my article Abhinav Gautam

[edit]

Hi this is Abhinav Gautam. I am an actor and model in Indian Film Industry, I request to create my biography. Please

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most sources are clearly not independent - several are the same cross published puff piece
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:58, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Abhinav Gautam Gladrags Model 2001.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Abhinav Gautam Gladrags Model 2001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 05:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khushi Mukherjee (August 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hatchens was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: NOTE: The draft is created by the entity itself. -
Hatchens (talk) 14:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ag.abhinavgautam, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as K.Mukherjee1996 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2402:3A80:6D6:C5C6:8CB2:8749:946D:7653 (talk) 10:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

REQUIRED Paid editing disclosure

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Ag.abhinavgautam. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Khushi Mukherjee, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ag.abhinavgautam. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ag.abhinavgautam|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. This disclosure is REQUIRED by the Wikimedia Terms of Use. You MUST declare if you are being paid in any way, including internships, for editing, as well as disclose any conflict of interest. Again, this is not optional. Ravensfire (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khushi Mukherjee (August 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheWikiholic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheWikiholic (talk) 11:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
124 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Illuminati Films (talk) Add sources
838 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Sanaya Irani (talk) Add sources
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Ankit Bhardwaj (talk) Add sources
355 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Madras Christian College (talk) Add sources
73 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Ek Boond Ishq (talk) Add sources
65 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Sobha Singh (painter) (talk) Add sources
118 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kumaar (talk) Cleanup
81 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Anand Bakshi filmography (talk) Cleanup
1,420 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? (talk) Cleanup
132 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ulka Gupta (talk) Expand
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Jehangir Sabavala (talk) Expand
293 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Indian Ballistic Missile Defence Programme (talk) Expand
191 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sexuality in India (talk) Unencyclopaedic
210 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ring girl (talk) Unencyclopaedic
62 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Guna, India (talk) Unencyclopaedic
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Water Research Institute (Verbania) (talk) Merge
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Modern Sign Language communication (talk) Merge
114 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Dubai World (talk) Merge
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Manilal Nag (talk) Wikify
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Handel Manuel (talk) Wikify
143 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Raja Bundela (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Bouri Sanhouidi (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Amal Naseer (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Bhagwan Singh Josh (talk) Orphan
503 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dinesh Vijan (talk) Stub
88 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Haunted Hills (talk) Stub
87 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Rohan Gandotra (talk) Stub
207 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Semantic Scholar (talk) Stub
108 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Kalyanji Virji Shah (talk) Stub
61 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Army Training Command (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

[edit]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Khushi Mukherjee, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ag.abhinavgautam, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ag.abhinavgautam|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Ravensfire (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

hello, Khushi Mukherjee ji my friend, she she paid me Rs.501 rupee for this. thanks

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khushi Mukherjee (September 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 23:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhinav Gautam (December 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jupitus Smart 14:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Khushi Mukherjee

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ag.abhinavgautam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khushi Mukherjee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Khushi Mukherjee

[edit]

Hello, Ag.abhinavgautam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khushi Mukherjee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]

{{subst:AfC decline|cv=no|sig=yes|full=|reason= I request to create this article. Please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamagautam (talk • contribs) 14:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abhinav Gautam

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ag.abhinavgautam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abhinav Gautam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ag.abhinavgautam&oldid=1164848567"