Jump to content

User talk:Cooljuno411/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

April 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to California. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronbo76 13:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use image use

Three times now I have removed the fair use, copyrighted image Image:Myspace logo.PNG from your userpage [1][2][3], the last being just now. Twice you have reverted these removals. Our policy as expressed at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria item #9 strictly forbids the use of fair use images outside of the main article namespace. You may not have this image, or any other fair use image, on your userpage. Do not add this image again. If you have questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. --Durin 13:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Snowplow SanDiegoCounty.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Snowplow SanDiegoCounty.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Largest cities in North America

Please look at the list and note that no other list entry has a link to a metropolitan area. You can't link one to a metro just because you happen to be from that area. The list shows links to cities for consistency. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

It's either all or none, and since all the cities listed do not have metro areas with blue links, I think it is best to remove the links to metropolitan areas. -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
BTW, your adding of just American (USA) cities is very POV. -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Looks like you must be new then. POV stands for "Point of view". Please read WP:POV. Basically, you listed just american metropolitan areas rather than for other countries, which is contributing to a pro-American bias on Wikipedia which is certainly frowned upon. -- Earl Andrew - talk 19:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Metro areas, S.D.

Hi, I understand the concept of the metropolitan area, and I know that whether the S.D. area includes TJ or not is controversial and that both figures should be given in the San Diego article. My objection is that the Escondido article should not have figures for the San Diego metropolitan area, because it is an article on Escondido and not the S.D. metro area. Why stop at the metro area? Why not also the pop of the state, and the U.S., and the World? Escondido is part of all those areas. We don't include them because they are not immediately relevant to understanding Escondido. The metropolitan area fall into the same category. Thanks for your contributions to the articles -- it's great to have your additions in general, but I disagree on this point. Best. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi -- let's talk about this at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Southern_California where we can get a greater consensus. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I would suggest that the problem is a miss understanding of how the info box is using the term "Metro" see my rely in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Southern California Dbiel (Talk) 20:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:800px-San Diego-Tijuana Metro 3D Pinpoint, Coronado, Ca.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:800px-San Diego-Tijuana Metro 3D Pinpoint, Coronado, Ca.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Portal:San Diego

The above portal page is being considered for deletion in accord with wikipedia policy. Please feel free to take part in the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:San Diego. Thank you. John Carter 19:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of Black Wax

A tag has been placed on Black Wax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Toddstreat1 20:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Black Wax Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Black Wax Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:San Diego Trolley Silver Line-2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:San Diego Trolley Silver Line-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Template:Public Transportation in Greater San Diego

I prefer the previous version of {{Public Transportation in Greater San Diego}} but wanted to discuss it with you before reverting the changes. The previous version, as seen here better matches the standard appearance of navigation templates, to go on the bottom of the article rather than a box on the side. You claim that this is a variation on the infobox templates, but it isn't. Infobox templates typically are placed at the upper right side of the article and provide a summary of details about the subject of the article, not links to similar articles. Your desire to have this in a See Also section creates problems since come of the articles don't need one otherwise, and this box extends beyond that section in most cases. -- Hawaiian717 22:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Since it's obvious that we have different opinions and aren't going to come to an agreement between just the two of us, I brought it up for further discussion at the WikiProject California talk page. -- Hawaiian717 22:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Please don't change the template back to the infobox format. It's not an infobox, but a navigation template, which goes along the bottom. The discussion was open on the WikiProject California talk page I mentioned above and the opinion of everyone who voiced an opinion was that it should follow the standard format for a navigation template. -- Hawaiian717 00:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Cooljuno411-mail.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cooljuno411-mail.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 22:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cooljuno411-mail.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cooljuno411-mail.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:WeBot-screenshot.png

Thanks for uploading Image:WeBot-screenshot.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 22:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:San Diego Trolley Silver Line-2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:San Diego Trolley Silver Line-2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jason McHuff (talk) 05:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tatu_remixes_2cd.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tatu_remixes_2cd.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 09:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Jesse died and no one cried

You don't seem to care about the death of Jesse, so where does that leave you? Here's an idea. No hate crimes, just crimes. Everyone treated the same. Isn't that what gays always whine for? In fact you want special extra rights. I will mourn for Jesse and the others like him.70.108.117.53 (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Please don't insert text like this into the articles. Also, I suggest you read WP:BLP#Presumption_in_favor_of_privacy, if you haven't already done so. Wikipedia is not a tabloid, and we should be especially conservative when it comes to exposing the details of minors. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, henrik•talk 21:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know, I've removed the majority of scare quotes around your use of the word "suspect." Talk pages must also comply with BLP -- the person in question is a suspect, not a "suspect." The difference is key. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Also, the situation's progressed a bit. Current discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#E.O. Green School shooting again, help please. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of SDMTS Signs:Orange Line-20px

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, SDMTS Signs:Orange Line-20px, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 23:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Was making a template, sorry.

RE:Speedy Deletion

If you read the tag, it states that it has very little context. I did not tag it with nonsense. But, as of now, the speedy tag still applies. It is a very short article with little information as to the importance of the subject. For all I know, it could be a neogolism. You never added sources to the article either. The tag has nothing to do with being "power hungry" and your comment was very uncivil. If you respond in a sense, like your before post, I will hence ignore you and delete your comments. Undeath (talk) 23:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Undefined sexuality

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Undefined sexuality, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Undefined sexuality. Undeath (talk) 01:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:UndefinedSym.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Undeath (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Asexuality

Your recent edits to the article on asexuality were recently deleted and then you undeleted them. I believe that this may be a misunderstanding of the purpose of Wikipedia. The definition of asexuality given is not how I think asexuality should be defined or how you think asexuality should be defined, but how asexuality is defined by sources of information about asexuality. This includes asexual websites, newspaper or magazine articles, and published research. While there continues to be some disagreement over how to define asexuality, Wikipedia is not the place to debate this. As such, the definition of the asexuality article should be the one mostly commonly given in sources cited in the article. This is why I deleted you edits and presumably why the other user did as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freunlaven47 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Undefined sexuality

An article that you have been involved in editing, Undefined sexuality, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undefined sexuality. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 22:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Anthrosexual

An editor has nominated Anthrosexual, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthrosexual and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

3RR warning

You've reverted Template:Sexual orientation three times in the past 24 hours. See WP:3RR. Fireplace (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 24 hours for breach of the 3RR policy Jimfbleak (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cooljuno411 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was reverting edits by User:fireplace who was continuously vandalizing Template:Sexual orientation by removing Anthrosexual from the template. If you look at the template know, it is locked with my edit being the one on top. With Anthrosexual currently on the template. And the template was locked to prevent Fireplace from continuing to vandalize the article. I am currently highly offended by the actions set forth by User:Jimfbleak, the admin who blocked me. He displayed a high case of negligence and it is apparent that he did not commence any investigating before commencing my unjust ban. I feel that this incident proves that his motives are highly bias and are based on power hunger. I feel that (s)he is not fit to continue duties as an admin and that that (s)he should be relieved from his duties. This case makes it apparent that he is not fit to serve wikipedia. I would also like a formal apology, and my block recorded be fully expunged for this offensive act and that justice should take its course and User:fireplace should do the time that was wrongfully placed on me, and was properly meant for him in the first place. I strongly emphases on clearing my block record from this unjust act, It has now been permanently scared and my credentials destroyed do to a faulty admin's actions.

Decline reason:

You created an article. That article is under AfD. You added a link to your article on the template page. Others specifically stated in their edit summaries that you should use the talk page and/or wait for the AfD to end. You chose to edit war. There was no vandalism from fireplace and an admin need not be desysopped simply because you disagree with being blocked. — IrishGuy talk 20:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit-conflicted endorsement of decline reason: While you may not have exceeded 3RR, you were certainly being disruptive, having been reverted multiple times over several days by two different editors. You made no attempt to discuss this on the template's talk page. 3RR is not an entitlement - if you are edit warring, you can still be blocked. Fireplace's edits were not vandalism. Also, throwing attacks and accusations at other editors in an unblock request is generally a Bad Thing in terms of getting your block lifted. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I've seen your email, I think the above deal with the points you made. Jimfbleak (talk) 05:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

{{User:Cooljuno411/Template:bgresearchfirst}} et. al.

Please don't use these templates on AFD discussions. There is no policy which requires that all users "MUST justify [their] opinion in high detail" in such discussions. If you want to request that users elaborate, you may do so with an ordinary

  • Comment. Before placing an opinion on this articles future, please read the ENTIRE article and do your own background research on this topic first.

or similar. Demanding that users do so ("MUST justify"), doing so without signing your name to the request, and doing so with ambox templates, all lend an authority to the statement which is not grounded in policy. Zetawoof(ζ) 07:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Comments on anthrosexual AFD

You've been making a lot of inappropriate comments on the AFD for anthrosexual. If someone disagrees with you, it doesn't mean that they haven't read the article or are uninformed. Also, you should probably review the Wikipedia policies on being civil during discussions, verifiability and original research.-Wafulz (talk) 03:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I will also comment on this as I noticed it a long time before it started again. I will warn you one last time(this is to cooljuno, not wafulz) If you attack another user, I will report you to the proper place on wikipedia. You were already blocked for edit waring, and that was only 24 hours. If you continue to do this, the block you will recieve, will more than likely be a month. Please remain civil in AfD or don't say anything at all. Undeath (talk) 04:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:San Clemete island on map.jpg

This image was deleted for copyright reasons. It clearly used elements from an online map service, and as such is not public domain. If you'd like, you may find an alternative at WP:MAPS.-Wafulz (talk) 03:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

AGF at AFD

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. This edit is not constructive, it is uncivil, and is failing to assume good faith. You do not have the right to question editors' motivations (see WP:AGF). Please review WP:EQ and WP:5. Edits like the above are disruptive - please don't disrupt wikipedia to make a point--Cailil talk 19:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Anthrosexual AfD

Sorry to see that the article was deleted rather than merged. AfD is not a particularly happy place and editor get quite hot under the collar about the discussion. I hope that it hasn't put you off the project as a whole.

Good luck with your next article and do try to remember that if you can't source a statement then you will be forever accused of original research. Kind regards -- BpEps - t@lk 06:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Anthrosexual

I know that the article anthrosexual was deleted but it think the talk page should be reinstated do to it's contents value. I can see the article being recreated in the future when proper sourcing comes to light. And the talk could be of value. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Annd btw, i recreated anthrosexual to redirect to Pomosexual, which has the closest similar def. The are essentially the same concept but the names give a different route and idea to the achieved concept. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I reviewed the talk page and saw very little that wasn't discussion of the various stages in the deletion process. It wouldn't be normal to have the talk page be restored for a deleted page while having the article space page remain a redirect. I recommend you redirect the talk page to Talk:Pomosexual or leave it redlinked. If you think there is something on the old talk page you could use, I will restore it to your usertalk space for you, but I don't see the value and it would probably eventually get deleted by MFD. It looks to me like there would be far more of value, and even then not much, to restoring the article to your userspace, which I'd be happy to do if you think it will help you edit Pomosexual - again, you'd have to work on it though - or at least put a note on it regarding what you were using it for or MfD would surely nix it soon. Pomosexual was never mentioned in the deletion discussion that I recall or I might have been persuaded to merge the article there.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 00:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't think it will be necessary then, but User:Mears man spoke of Pomosexual in the afd, that is how i came across it. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 04:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on African American. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 22:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Michael Jackson images

Hi, I've had to comment out fair-use images here because fair-use is only permitted in Article space, not User space. I've left links in, and free images, however. Cheers. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 19:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Stop playing games with images on Michael Jackson. Admins here and on Commons are not so stupid that they can't see where these images are coming from. The next breach of copyright gets you blocked. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 21:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

If i can download it then would it be, CC-BY-SA, cause that's what my understanding based on that article. If i am wrong please consider changing the article to correct its definition. I followed all the rules and labeled it as such too. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I will see if i can get a fair use permission cause that 1984 picture needs to go... --Cooljuno411 (talk) 22:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Fair-use images of living people are not allowed in infoboxes. It's been removed again. Please leave the free image there or find another one, but not a fair-use image. That's a breach of copyright policy. Probably worth taking some time to read the policy, actually. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 23:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Well than i guess i'll just put the image on the article. And please source the article for me.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael jackson in a car.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Pictures

I removed your latest incarnation on the michael Jackson page. In no way did it bring anything useful to the issue of his humanitarian statues so would cause the article to fail FA. However if you want to add anymore pictures, particulary to the charity section, i actually need your help. Looking at the pictures we have shoots from 1984, 1987, 1995, 2005. We need a picture from the Dangerous era (1991-1993) that ilistrates his humanitarian stuff with the heal the world foundation. If you can get something on that it would be very useful. Realist2 (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about, he was speaking on the subject when that picture was taken so what seems to be the issue? I sourced it and everything.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Its not relevant to the humanitarian issue, there are pictures on his humanitarian efforts that ARE useful but that is not. As you are good with pictures i would appreciate it if you could find something from the early 90's that would be very good there. Realist2 (talk) 19:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, SO INSTEAD OF A PICTURE OF HIM TALKING ON STAGE, YOU WOULD RATHER HIM BE DOING WHAT????? I'm sorry but that is what he does, i am not sure if i can find a picture of him digging wells in Mexico, or something, for the locals. Sorry that is what you get, him speaking out on stage or singing for charity. That is what he does....

I have a picture of him singing and the page say: "Michael Jackson performing at the Democratic National Committee's "A Night at the Apollo" voter registration drive & fund-raiser at The Apollo Theater in New York City. April 24, 2002.". But it is not from the early 90s. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 20:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes i looked at the site myself just now, that picture of him singing live would be much more relevant, shame its not from the early 90's but its better. Im dumbfounded that you never choose that in the first place, you dont intentionally have to add pictures that portray Jackson in a bad light when there is a perfectly good one right next to it. Realist2 (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


Could you also add his picture to the dangerous era. pic.Realist2 (talk) 20:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

How is someone standing on stage "bad light", you think i'm out to get him or something. W/e. But i'll shrink and upload that picture in a moment.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 20:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Before you add any more pictures i advise you consult me first. You consistantly miss name or misrepresent them. Your lastest picture is most certainly not a bad era picture. Realist2 (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Firstly we already have a good picture for the bad era and seconly its not a bad era picture. Its from his history world tour. Just look at his face its obvious its 1995 onwards. Realist2 (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

You can have more that one picture per a section, I personally like articles to have lots of pictures (see:San Diego-Tijuana metropolitan area, for an example) and feel free to take a picture or other pictures from [[4]].
Before you do that, you should probably note the bit that says "Content Copyright © 2002 -2006 All Michael Jackson.com. All Rights Reserved". Zetawoof(ζ) 21:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
If it is a historical event, which most are, then it can fall under FAIR USE...--Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Also all pictures bar two had to be removed as part of the FA review. Realist2 (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Can you upload this and this from flickr onto wikicommons. These will be able to pass wikipedia requirements. That last picture will be very usefull as it shows all the faces at the same angle and hoe he changed over 20 years. I believe they will be allowed on an FA reviewed article. Realist2 (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tv martin bashir doc michael jackson.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tv martin bashir doc michael jackson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael jackson in a car.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael jackson in a car.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael Jackson, LAS VEGAS - OCTOBER 27, Radio Music Awards.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Jackson, LAS VEGAS - OCTOBER 27, Radio Music Awards.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael Jackson-Democratic National Committee's A Night at the Apollo voter registration drive & fund-raiser.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Jackson-Democratic National Committee's A Night at the Apollo voter registration drive & fund-raiser.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Michael Jackson-London 15th July 1988 bad tour.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Jackson-London 15th July 1988 bad tour.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Image in signature

Hi Cooljuno, You've got an image in your signature now. This is against the signature guideline at WP:SIG#Images. Would you please remove the image? Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Aleta Sing 21:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Cooljuno, I noticed that you're still using an image in your signature. Could you please remove it? As Aleta pointed out above, WP:SIG#Images asks editors not to place images in their signatures, for it can slow down the servers, distract users from the actual text of the conversation, and be an easy target for image-related vandalism among other things (imagine what would happen if someone were to replace that image with an inappropriate one and it were to suddenly appear on every talk page on which you had ever commented). Thanks for your cooperation. —MearsMan talk 14:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Day of Silence section in West Hills High School

Hey CoolJuno411, this is just a heads up that the section needs some third-party references in order to remain in the article. You can check out its discussion page for an explanation...thanks! --99.231.118.172 (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

California same sex marriage

If you want to suggest it, put it at WP:ITN/C. -CWY2190(talk • contributions) 00:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

I put it up here. --Falcorian (talk) 01:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chug and chase

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chug and chase, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stifle (talk) 23:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Your comments on ITN

Your comments on ITN are unwanted and innapropriate. I do not appreciate you saying "Your a fuck'n ignorant and hypocritical peace of shit." You need to calm down. I have the streange impression that same-sex marriage is very improtant to you - why I do not know - but that does not excuse what you've said. You need to read WP:CIVIL. I have reported you at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts‎. --PlasmaTwa2 23:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to report yourself too. You have said somethings in violation as well.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 03:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
If you have a problem with things I have said you can report them yourself. --PlasmaTwa2 04:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Warning about WP:NPA

Okay, first of all WP is not a forum, so take the political discussion elsewhere. Nobody cares. Cooljuno411 (talk · contribs), please refrain from making personal attacks like "you people" and the like. Lemmey (talk · contribs), stop trolling. You made an offensive comment, people called you on it, and so you freaking bolded it just to rile people up further. Everyone should be reminded of WP:CIVIL, and move on as this is not going up as is. -- Grant.Alpaugh 17:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop

Chug and chaser was deleted, so stop reverting Chaser to include it or else you will be blocked for disruption. --Stephen 22:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage in the USA.SVG

I'm not sure why you have taken such a negative tone in the talk page for the above article, but it is not necessary. If you think I am challenging you because I don't support same-sex marriage, you are wrong: I do support it. If you are upset merely because I am disagreeing with you, then please take a deep breath before writing. It is possible for people to have an honest disagreement and the talk page is a place to air that without getting nasty. Based on my knowledge of the law and the practices I have seen on Wikipedia on a variety of topics, I believe it would be wrong to act as though California has same-sex marriage before 17 June. -Rrius (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

What is an "orientation" anyway??

Hi. The question of whether to label certain things as "orientations" or not is often a very ideologically charged one, and one on which different writers strongly disagree. For example, the article about zoosexuality (attraction to animals), which you just restored to the list of sexual orientations, describes one of these controversies.

By including the controversial term on a list of sexual orientations, we would be taking a side in that controversy, which of course is against the Neutral Point of View policy.

Excluding the term may look like just taking the opposite side, but this isn't the case if we are careful to follow published academic consensus rather than any one private opinion.

The controversy over what an "orientation" is is notable in itself, and can be discussed at length in the main sexual orientation article. Individual forms of sex that some people call orientations (and some people don't) can be listed as part of that discussion.

Dybryd (talk) 18:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

edit warring warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Sexual orientation. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

no references in templates

Cooljuno, please don't put references in templates. they don't belong there, and they can really screw things up on other pages when they get transcluded in.

Sexual Orientation

Cooljuno411, I have undone one of your edits to sexual orientation. The wording you used in the lede was extremely confusing. I do not think that it was even a proper sentence. Skoojal (talk) 08:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I made it more clear.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
The wording you used does not make sense and is not based on a proper source. I reverted it. Skoojal (talk) 08:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Signature

Hello, Using <big> tags in your signature is not advised by Wikipedia's signature policy. You might want to consider removing them. Thanks, Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 18:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Well good thing i don't --Cooljuno411 (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Civility

Cooljuno411, you left the following message on my talk page: 'Please stop removing Template:Sexual orientation from articles, you've already done it to sexual orientation and homosexuality, they are there for a reason. And do not remove Non-heterosexual, that is a term use is sexology and was places on the articles for a reason.' Please be more civil and constructive in your comments. There is no use in saying that something is there for a reason unless you say what the reason is. Regarding "non-heterosexual", you seem to be referring to the fact that I suggested this article be deleted. Since I have a right to have different opinions from you, I also have every right to make that suggestion. Skoojal (talk) 23:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Ahem

Do not experiment with Templates.[5] follow the link and hit edit. You can then copy that version to your own userspace and experiment there. Banjeboi 01:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. CIreland (talk) 01:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cooljuno411 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ridiculous, i even referenced the template, template:sexual orientations. It's not my fault someone believes that zoosexuality is not a sexual orientation, when it is. I've come to learn this whole blocking thing works by banning the person who wasn't the first one to claim a case, next time i'll be sure to be the first one to run to admin in a dispute, then i won't be the one blocked.

Decline reason:

Well, what we've learned is that the burnt fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the fire. You were blocked for this behavior before and continue to indulge in it, and you get blocked again and your unblock request shows that you've learned entirely the wrong lesson. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For what it's worth they blocked you before seeing the ANI thread. My post there was to get the page protected to stop the edit-warring until consensus was reached. Banjeboi 02:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I want to see the actual compliant submitted, do you know where it is.... i love seeing what they say. ¦¬ ] --Cooljuno411 (talk) 02:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Oh hell no, that's some dried out shit right there nigga. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 02:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

That just got you another 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

PA-LEASE.... don't come to my page if you don't want to hear my opinion. I comply on other peoples' talk pages and article pages, but don't be commin' on MY page and tell ME how i can talk on it. Like i said, step it out if you can't handle the heat, i don't bring the fire to you, you came lookin' and now y'all be crying cause you got yo'self burnt. And just wondering how you pulled of admin rights, you didn't even leave me a reason for the additional 24hrs. Shows how power hungry some people tend to be, hope your happy with you little confidence boost.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 02:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
You want a reason? Use of profanity and a racial slur. That's incivility. And I was being generous ... some people at AN/I wanted an indefinite block, IIRC. Daniel Case (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Well that's what you interpret it as, i don't. When i say "nigga" i am not referring to a "racial slur", i am referring to a person, when i say nigga i mean person. I see the world from the 21st century, my vocabulary is based on a different dictionary then yours. Just how gay doesn't mean happy anymore, nigga doesn't mean a "racial slur" anymore (that would be nigger), but at least nigga wasn't lost into a negative manor, as gay was, nigga is just a neutral world for person. ex: "nigga please", "nigga what you doing?", "what up my nigga", etc... And by me being blocked, you are hold and unnatural point of view, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Sorry not everyone sees the world from your eyes.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 21:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I think most people would consider "nigga" or "nigger" of any form not an appropriate term for polite conversation, especially with people whom you do not know extremely well. It is certainly not a term that we should be using here. Aleta Sing 22:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
When i'm in public (article talk pages), i hold my tug, but if your on MY talk page, don't expect me to hold my tung in my own house. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 22:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
You linked above to the article about the term "nigger". Well, there is also an interesting one about "nigga", which confirms its offensive nature. Aleta Sing 22:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
And that is the opinion held by the editor of that page. Not mine. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if you're on an article's talk page or your own talk page; racial slurs are unacceptable anywhere on Wikipedia, as they constitute a personal attack. Taken straight from the page, in regard to inappropriate comments: "Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, religious, political, ethnic, or other epithets (such as against people with disabilities) directed against another contributor. Disagreement over what constitutes a religion, race, sexual preference, or ethnicity is not a legitimate excuse." —MearsMan talk 22:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Well you interprate the world that way, i don't.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Interpretation is irrelevant, the fact is that further use of that kind of language on Wikipedia talk pages will get you blocked. So if you want to continue editing, you will have to stop using that word on talk pages. You may think that this is unfair or wrong, but it is still a fact. --Leivick (talk) 23:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, i do think it is unfair, IT's MY TALK PAGE, and so your playin' with my dictionary, not yours. I don't say anything that can be faintly interpreted as rood on other people's talk page or on article talk pages, because it is not mine, and i should respect it. Like i said above, my house, my rules, your house, your rules. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I want to make this as clear as possible so that you don't get blocked again. What I said above applies to any talk page including your own. Civility is required everywhere on Wikipedia whether you think it is fair or not. --Leivick (talk) 23:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Ok great, understand that, i am mainly concerned though about how i was banned in the first place, via reverting a template that User:Ludwigs2 kept reverting back, when it was incorrect, i even referenced my version. Template:Sexual orientation, that was a very unjust ban. This is my version: [6], and this was User:Ludwigs2's [7], and btw, he made his version in disagreement with the past one, which reflected more similar to mine mine, [8]. User:Ludwigs2 versions main difference between mine and the past edit was he believes zoosexuality, asexuality, and other terms are not true sexual orientations, even though it says it right there on the articles too. I accept the civility ban, but i believe this ban is strongly unjust. He is the one that should be banned, i was only referencing and reverting his opinionated edits. He had no bases, references, or logic behind his edits. --Cooljuno411 (talk) 00:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
I blocked you initally because by making four reverts within 24 hours you broke the three-revert-rule. Nobody else was blocked because nobody else broke the three-revert-rule. In fact, no other person reverted more than twice - which should be a good indicator that you were not only edit-warring but possibly doing so against consensus. CIreland (talk) 00:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Your signature was brought up in the WP:AN/I discussion. Before you resume editing, please reduce its size. Per WP:SIG, large signatures such as yours disrupt surrounding text and should not be used. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 15:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Fact tag

Hi, you might find {{fact}} useful when tagging items for verifiability. p.s. I'm glad you're back. Banjeboi 14:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, List of United States presidents who have committed adultery while in office, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. 206.116.63.240 (talk) 04:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Sexual Orientation

Cooljuno411, I have undone your latest edits to the Sexual Orientation article. Please do not remove the quote marks from the definition of sexual orientation - it doesn't help things to obscure the fact that the definition is a direct quote from the given source. Also, the wording you used (eg, Sexual orientation refers to an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions to men, women, or both sexes, however, some people may use different labels or none at all) was confused. In that sentence, it's unclear what the 'different labels' part refers to (different labels from what?) or what it has to do with the definition itself. You might try using a reworded version of this. The different labels bit should be part of a separate sentence, in my view. Skoojal (talk) 02:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Sweetie

I'd appreciate it if you stopped calling me "sweetie." It's not exactly professional. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

AN/I

Hello, Cooljuno411. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tiptoety talk 07:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Renewable energy

I removed your addition to renewable energy. It was wp:OR and wp:SYN. NJGW (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP

Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Courtesy note. I have closed Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP as "Keep." However, I would encourage you to take note of my comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject VVMAP#MfD exerpt. Regards, Anthøny (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:San Diego transit topics

Template:San Diego transit topics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Hawaiian717 (talk) 18:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

New template

The template you created, Template:2008 US elections, Non-heterosexual related articles, and added to a number of pages, has been speedy-deleted because its sole purpose was to disparage the supporters of the legislation described in the pages to which you added it. Please refrain from creating content of this nature. Thank you. Mike Doughney (talk) 04:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Beginning a sentence with a "however"

Hi, it's actually ok in the Sexual orientation instance that you changed - see grammar articles like However at the beginning of a sentence & Starting a Sentence With "However". --EqualRights (talk) 11:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WeBot.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:WeBot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WeBot-iPhone-screenshot.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:WeBot-iPhone-screenshot.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Sexual orientation labels, identity, and referenda

Template:Sexual orientation labels, identity, and referenda has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ludwigs2 04:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents FYI

An issue involving you has been brought up on AN/I. --Onorem♠Dil 14:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Your sig

I notice this has been brought up at AN/I two times now. Stop changing it so that it is that big. I notice that every time you are warned, you change it back, then a little time passes and you make it big again. Change it to small, and leave it small, or I will take this to AN/I. This kind of behavior is disruptive, please stop.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 06:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

LOLZ.....You assume, i use font size 3 when starting conversations and bullets, and font size 2 for responses... don't flatter yourself by thinking you just busted me on a lil scam. Believe me, i'm not going to waste my time try to go on the down low and reuse my signature once "time passes". And please link me to these "discussions" about my signature and to the actual rule that says i'm in violation, that would be nice, thanks. And now i will use font size 2 because i am responding to something.... based on what i just said at the beginning of this sentence, this wouldn't be the time for size 3.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 06:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Right here. As you can see, your sig was found to be too big, it is disruptive, and I quote:

"Since the system lets him do it, then it's implicitly "acceptable". " Actually, no. Take a read through WP:SIG, and you will see that there are many things that the systems allows us to do, that are completely unacceptable in signatures. Considerably larger text, which effects surrounding text, is one of the things that is not acceptable. He needs to change it. - auburnpilot talk 15:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

So again, leave it at 2, and do not make it larger. Even if you aren't doing what I originally thought, it is still against policy.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 06:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Your sig, again. Final warning:

Please see this AN/I discussion about you. Please therefore reduce the size of your signature, and do not again alter it. Should this matter be raised again it is likely that you will be sanctioned.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 01:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


Also, in reference to the edit you made to your userpage, your signature must include a link to either your user page, or your talk page, as can be seen here, and I quote, just to make sure:

It is common practice to include a link to your user page or user talk page (often both); the default signature links to the user page. At least one of those two pages must be linked from your signature to allow other editors simple access to your talk page and contributions log.

— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 01:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Chill out.... i haven't even use my signature on a talk page..... i was messing with the signature preference thing..... The only placed i test it on was MY user page, and you have no right to say what i can do with my user page. --cooljuno411 21:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
First, it is not your userpage, it is owned by the wikimedia foundation, not you. But that is besides the point, my warning was not telling what you could and could not use on the userpage, it was a warning against using big tags in your signature, or font size 3, which is the same size as the big tags. You said that you did so when you were doing specific kinds of comments, well it isn't allowed, so stop.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 22:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Look through my history.... i haven't comment any talk page with a "big" or "size 3" font since you "warned me".--cooljuno411 02:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
The final warning was a suggestion from an admin who commented on the thread at AN/I.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 05:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

go easy on the "fact" tags

If there's an article or section of an article that doesn't cite its sources, just use a general tag rather than a billion "fact" tags. They make the article unreadable. Thx. 76.216.113.120 (talk) 07:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Political positions of George W. Bush

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Political positions of George W. Bush, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Political positions of George W. Bush is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Political positions of George W. Bush, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tiny star for rating.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tiny star for rating.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Use of talk pages

The use of talk pages on articles is for discussing the improvement of that article, it is not used for noting people of related pages that need work. Please read WP:TPG, for more info on how to use the talk page of an article. Secondly, if you want help expanding the article you were linking to, I suggest you try and create a wikiproject, or join an existing project, to allow others to notice, and improve upon the said article.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Archives

What are your plans for that group of old article versions you have saved in your archives?—Kww(talk) 20:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

personal records. --cooljuno411 22:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Why isn't the history of the articles sufficient?—Kww(talk) 00:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
At the time i preffered having my "own copy" in a way. Those archives really have no value in the way know, except sentimental because i don't like to delete archived things, online and off.--cooljuno411 00:38, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
I won't make a stink about them, but I will ask "Please delete them" in a nice voice. I'm in the process of eradicating all references to Media Traffic from Wikipedia, and you can see that you are a relatively large source of them. Since they aren't in article space, it isn't critical, but it does make it harder for me to see new references when people add them.—Kww(talk) 01:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Please check your "facts" before placing accusations in the edit history

And please don't misquote other people when doing so. I reverted this edit, which did not contain a {{fact}} tag; it contained an improperly formed {{ref}} tag. As such it was a perfectly reasonable edit and not a "violation of Wikipedia". My actual comment was "No actual reference given."; perfectly reasonable when reverting a malformed {{ref}} tag, and not "can't find a reference", which is how you incorrectly report it in your comment. --Rogerb67 (talk) 15:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I've asked for more eyes on this

Hello, Cooljuno411. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Banjeboi 13:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sexual orientation. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cooljuno411/Archive_4&oldid=1142456441"