User talk:Gewingewin

Welcome!

Hello, Gewingewin, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Gabbar Singh ( The Dacoit ), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gabbar Singh ( The Dacoit )

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Gabbar Singh ( The Dacoit ) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/Sambarsquos-boss-was-for-real/article16478169.ece. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's inappropriate

Regarding this and the query you left on my talk page, I reverted because stating "A frightening figure with a handlebar mustache, long beard and bloodshot eyes" and similar is inappropriate. And you should know that. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

But that was all also written in the national and international newspapers .. Gewingewin (talk) 08:47, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If newspapers are really using wording like that, then I think you are referring to tabloids. See WP:TABLOID. We don't write like that here. And I ask that you stop responding on my talk page. Just respond here on yours. A new section is not needed with each new reply. Just respond in the same section. For help, visit the Help:Desk. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:00, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Or better yet, visit WP:Teahouse. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fine.i got about that paragraph. But rest of the stuff is perfect to post.

How could anyone update ??

Seattletimes.. an US news agency also wrote same stuff .. they are right and if anyone support that article or follow the same is inappropriate ??

Please suggest.. Gewingewin (talk) 08:59, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Gurjaradesa, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:13, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dharampal Singh Gudha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Pyari Gurjar ( The Lady Commander ) (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ram Pyari Gurjar ( The Lady Commander ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ram Pyari Gurjar ( The Lady Commander ), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gewingewin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Hi, please have a look at WP:RS. Blogs like ssbcrack.com are not acceptable sources for Wikipedia articles. Neither are caste-affiliated websites or publications by caste associations. utcursch | talk 16:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Abecedare (talk) 19:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Search exact text

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Search exact text requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 10:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

With this edit [[1]] you now appear to be edit warring, please stop.Slatersteven (talk) 15:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Poor English

@Utcursch: I need your help. This user has extremely poor English writing skills. Is there any way to make the user stop until he/she has proper grasp of writing? (Highpeaks35 (talk) 00:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

A note to the user with advice would be fine. If the issue persists, drop a note at WP:ANI per Wikipedia:Competence is required. utcursch | talk 03:30, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabbar Singh Gujjar ( The Dacoit ) (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

reason

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabbar Singh Gujjar ( The Dacoit ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gabbar Singh Gujjar ( The Dacoit ), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Pyari Gurjar ( The Lady Commander ) (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ram Pyari Gurjar ( The Lady Commander ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ram Pyari Gurjar ( The Lady Commander ), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ram Pyari Gurjar (The Lady Chieftain) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ram Pyari Gurjar (The Lady Chieftain) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Pyari Gurjar (The Lady Chieftain) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. utcursch | talk 16:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roop Chaudhary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghaziabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ram Saran Das for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ram Saran Das is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Saran Das until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Razer(talk) 20:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He has won the prestigious ‘Emerging young leader award’ in Washington.

A first pakistani to won.

He is not a comman man.

Why some person on wiki wants to rule here as own wish ?? And wants to edit or delete per own choice..

August 2018

Hello, I'm Modulus12. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Nahid Hasan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Modulus12 (talk) 06:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mriganka Singh is another. Other Wikipedia articles can't be used as a reliable source. Modulus12 (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Modulus12.

Plz see Mriganka fathr Hukum singh page and Nahid hasan fathr Munavar hasan page..

They all are "Gujjar" so i just likned

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with blocks or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Razer(talk) 07:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kunwar Pranav Singh (politician), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 18:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fayaz-ul-Hasan Chohan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 07:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raj Kumar Gujar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Raj Kumar Gujar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Razer(talk) 10:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He has won the prestigious ‘Emerging young leader award’ in Washington.

A first pakistani to won.

He is not a comman man.

Why some person on wiki wants to rule here as own wish ?? And wants to edit or delete per own choice..

August 2018

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ram Saran Das. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Razer(talk) 11:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How much time needed for discussion that small article ??

And why delete ??

He was the State president of ploitical party.. not a common boy like you

1 year is enough ??

Why some person on wiki wants to rule here as own wish ?? And wants to edit or delete per own choice..

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially, the problems are that your English is not at a sufficiently advanced level to write prose on the English Wikipedia, and you have been warned about this many times. It has nothing to do with whether the people you are writing about are notable, and I'll ask Vanamonde93 and Winged Blades of Godric to see if they can do anything with Raj Kumar Gujar (which I have to delete as it is a word-for-word plagiarism of the Tribune source), but for now I think you would be better off using the Wikipedia in your native language instead. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no notability and by a mile or so.Won an accolade in an exchange program, (nothing more than that) and coupled with the fact that he's a Hindu in a Musilm-dominated-state, garnered typically trivial media-attention.On a sidenote, Ritchie, your ping led the notification system to display You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently.......The saving grace was that it was a mention on someone else's t/p and it's pretty uncommon for the block message to be not pasted at one's own:-) ∯WBG^converse 13:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing a strong claim to notability here either. The award he won isn't remotely notable (it's 10k dollars, which is smaller than competitive awards most graduate students receive, for instance). I see two news stories mentioning it, but the coverage they have is a lot of puffery; very little genuine biographical material. Vanamonde (talk) 17:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ritchie333 What are you trying to show ??

Plz dnt gv me xyz reason of blocking..

That was nt my first artcle.. i hv made hundrd artcls.. chk my edit histry.. nd contributed a lott..

Soundz lyk u r also behavin as a dictatr ..

@Utcursch: Utkarsh.. plz guide these persns who wnts to rule wiki per der wish

∯WBG

Nd d entire credit goes to d wiki "Hitlor" of User:Razer2115 .. who wan to rule the web .. hahahahahaha

Nd plz dnt spread monoploy here..

My dear ∯WBG dis is nt abt deleting or not deletin.. just gv d exact reasn nd delete.. Instead doin dat few persons lyk User:Razer2115 and User:Ritchie333 r behavin lyk a monoply king f wiki.. hahahaha

@Utcursch: z d decnt nd knwlgble person here.. nd desrve appriciation..

Nd all momoply kings f shud learn smthng frm @Utcursch:

Speedy deletion nomination of Bharat Singh Kasana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bharat Singh Kasana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://twdi.in/node/4030. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of deleting the entire page , u can just edit or delete that Kargil War point..

It dsnt make any sense to delete whole artcle..

He was a Vir Chakra award holder ..

User:

Atlantic306 (talk)

User:Utcursch @Utcursch:

Nd d entire credit goes to d wiki hitlor""User:Razer2115 .. hahahahahahahaha

..

.. Gewin007 14:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amrinder Singh Kasana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amrinder Singh Kasana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bharatgodigital.com/indian-defence/major-amrinder-singh-vir-chakra-kargil-war-1999/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My dear Atlantic306 (talk) its bttr if u del my entire contrubtn to wiki nd artcles..

Only Kargil War portion frm here nd 1971 war portn frm bharat singh kasana needa sme edits..

Your warning

Thank you for your comment, but I have checked the valid sources that you include and often they either aren't reliable sources or in several cases the links don't work. YOU are responsible for both providing good sources with working links AND correctly citing them so readers will know which citation to check for which statement. There's such a thing as good will where fellow editors here are willing to help, but your refusal to listen to others and leaving pretty hostile talk page posts removes that good will. As you said, I do not rule here, but neither do you. Wikipedia's policies rule and you have to follow them. Ravensfire (talk) 16:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, please fix your signature so it includes a link to your user page or talk page. Right now it uses a different user name than your actual name and doesn't have a link. That's not acceptable and it must get fixed. see the page WP:SIGNATURE. Ravensfire (talk) 16:14, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ur warning in ur pocket (talk) .. hahahah

Mrovr, dnt rule wiki as hitlr

You just don't ever want to be unblocked, do you? Ah well, I'm being foolish for even bothering to spend energy replying to your nonsense, so done with that. Ravensfire (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ravensfire (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Your talk page access has been revoked for the Hitler comments. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kasana Gujjar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kasana Gujjar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DBig Xray 20:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kapil Gujjar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kapil Gujjar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Razer(talk) 09:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mam Chand Gurjar

Hello Gewingewin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mam Chand Gurjar for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Vexations (talk) 21:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jograj Singh Panwar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jograj Singh Panwar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jograj Singh Panwar

Hello, Gewingewin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jograj Singh Panwar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nagar Gujjar

The article Nagar Gujjar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. There is a colony called Gujjar Nagar - see [2] - but I've found nothing about the alleged clan in years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 09:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalyan Singh Gujjar

The article Kalyan Singh Gujjar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. There is a modern-day dacoit who bore same name. Source is actually about Vijay Singh Gujjar. Article was created by a now-indef'd Gurjar caste pov-pusher who used fake sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 10:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]