User talk:HexaChord/Archive Vandalism 1

hey

Please check your email. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

AIV Reports

Be sure when reporting editors to WP:AIV that they have the proper warnings. In most cases they need to receive a level 4 warning before being reported/blocked. Keep up the vandal fighting! -- pb30< talk> 19:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey

164.116.237.27 has been vandalizing your user page and my talk page (this user is vandalizing the pages of users who are telling him/her to stop vandalizing pages). Please give him another warning, thanks! Devrit 20:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Addition to SWAT page

I recently attempted to add another use of SWAT to the page, and was tld by you tat my edit had been 'reverted'. I do not wish to offend r mis-direct people, simply to inform readers of this other use. Please could you let me know what I am doing wrong, and guide me appropriately as to how I may do this? Many thanks, R Hall (on behalf of Tricia Lichfield, tricia@swat.tv) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.0.34 (talk) 21:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Reversions on Before_I_Self_Destruct

history for the page. The edits you are reverting are not clearly vandalism, and the editor introducing them is not a vandal. Both you and the IP editor have exceeded the three revert rule. Edit warring isn't acceptable, and it is better for the article and the encyclopedia to let the "bad revision" remain and seek some resolution on the talk page. I'm not sure if it is fair to block either account (as the edit war appears to be stale), not am I sure that protecting the article will solve this. So I need you and the IP editor to start a dialogue on the talk page or back away from the article for a while. Is that ok with you? Protonk (talk) 22:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Only followed this edit so if it was wrong I'm sorry. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 22:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem at all. I've given a 3RR warning to the IP editor, so hopefully that will be the end of this. Thanks for the quick response. Protonk (talk) 22:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

thanks

thank you :), best regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 01:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome! [1] --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 01:22, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...

... for fixing the vandalism on my User page. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 04:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

No

...Problem. Anytime! Wysprgr2005 (talk) 05:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC) Wysprgr2005 (talk) 05:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

....

i didnt vandalise that article!

metal drumkits usually have 2 DB drums, 4 toms, another floor tom and everything i put was accurate!

put my edits back, i think i may know more about metal drumkits than you considering i drum and i drum metal songs!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Screambloodygore667 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Primerica Financial Services

You reverted a revert by an IP address that was a valid revert [2]: PFS is probably not a pyramid scheme (or if it is the edit needs a cite!). Mark Hurd (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Did you read the remainder of [3]? The Sesame Street part? --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 07:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

That was all added by User:72.201.139.219 [4]. Mark Hurd (talk) 07:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Signing and Welcome and Thanks

Well, I thank you for your note, and certainly I do wind up with sign-bot-supplied signatures from time to time... But... I don't see that one that I missed. On an unrelated subject, I see your name on a lot of Vandalfighting. Thank you. The sheer VOLUME of the spam, vilification and, silliness, is staggering. :) Erm.. I have scrolled back through the last 50 edits and I can't see a missed sig (other than this one, but I caught it before sign-bot. Just curious. ;)sinneed (talk) 17:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

*lol* Should have been on another talk page ya know... --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 17:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Heh. No problemo. All the best and Thanks again. :) sinneed (talk) 17:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for the quick revert you did on my userpage. --Patrick (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

"No big!"--Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 19:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Reverts

I never really complain. (I'm not complaining, actually, lol) I read this: Reverted 3 edits by ESanchez013 and 99.255.71.201 to last version by Reinyday (HG). Only one undoing was mine. The anon IP did two vandalism edits and I did one undoing. So it's only one edit by me, two by the anon (over at the Family article). Please tell me this is just Huggle's default edit summary. I wasn't vandalizing. Thx! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 21:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it is, since you only undid one out of two vandal edits. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 21:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Whew. You've relieved me. Thx!! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 21:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

I've noticed something peculiar you were doing regarding reverts of pages that were about to be deleted. You do not have to revert every single edit made by a person who has created a page that's about to be speedied. It is only appropriate to revert them if they remove the speedy tag. Please be mindful of this when you use Huggle. You unnecessarily reverted some users several times on such pages. Just wanted to let you know. Keep up the great anti-vandal work.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 22:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism reversion

I essentially reverted a recent vandalism reversion that you made to Donovan McNabb. You reverted to an earlier version by Xcrunnner2828, but that itself was vandalism. This user has been vandalizing various articles with references to the so-called “church of Broan.” I have reverted all of those that I found. Also, I think that Xcrunner2828 and 68.81.120.242 are the same person. You might keep an eye on them. •Life of Riley (talk) 22:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thx. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 22:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

You must be joking

You just posted a warning on an IP talk page for the IP I was just using to edit for an NPOV violation. I edited a *talk page* giving someone a message. You can't be NPOV on a talk page!!! Did you even read the message? You just completely proved the point I was making. Please think before you post things like that. Thanks. Jwkpiano1 (talk) 23:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Do you a link? --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 23:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry. Here: User_talk:130.126.76.118 Jwkpiano1 (talk) 23:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

As you might see it's four different people contacting you for bad edits/habits. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 23:59, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Dude, look at them. The first one was me being angry at a guy who was making unsubstantiated edits on something ON A TALK PAGE. Then I responded to that warning, and the response was also reverted, and I got warned again. Then it happened TWO MORE TIMES! It's freaking ridiculous. It was ONE EDIT. Look at my past edits. Do I appear to be a disruptive editor to you? Give me a break. This is the most egregious violation of Do Not Bite the Newcomers I've ever seen, even though I'm actually not a newcomer. Jwkpiano1 (talk) 00:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

1. Why do you disguise contributions as an IP when you already have a registered account? 2. Even on a talk page there is no place to attack other people. 3. No, I am NOT joking. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 00:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

1. Perhaps I forgot to sign in. Did you think of that? 2. You don't know the context of what happened, and warning me for NPOV makes no sense at all. You used a template that you shouldn't have used. In fact, you had no right to intervene at all. You are not an administrator, though you seem to think you are. 3. Give me a break, you screwed up by warning someone for little to no reason whatsoever. Imagine if I were a newcomer. How do you think that would make me feel? Please use more discretion when deciding to warn someone; that's all I ask, OK? Thank you. Jwkpiano1 (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

1. What? proven my theory I am testing to be true Testing or no testing? 2. Again, no space for right-wing douchebag or You are a dumbass, sir. 3. Who`s seriously messed up? --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 03:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

DONT MESS UP MY PAGES!!! EVER AGAIN. please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildandcrazyguy007 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Block requested

User:HexaChord, I am requesting that you not only follow through on your threat to have anonymous editor 68.218.222.8, blocked, but that you make that block permanent. The IP is my home IP, and I have an adolescent who decided that it would be fun to edit Wikipedia today, and you see the result. My biggest fear is having my own reputation maligned, and so I want him to be forced to stop this behaviour. I would love to see him edit properly, but when he showed me what he was doing and thought it was funny, I was mortified. I'm hoping that he now understands how serious I take this, but there is absolutely no reason for my IP to be available for anonymous edits, and I would like it permanently blocked. Can you help me get this done? Unschool (talk) 02:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

By the way, I really don't have time to be online these days, but I will sign back on and check for your response when I finish working in a couple of hours. Thanks for your help. Unschool (talk) 02:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

You may request this block yourself. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 02:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Where do I go to do this? Unschool (talk) 03:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Don't sweat it, I'll figure this out. It just can't wait. Unschool (talk) 03:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Try Wikipedia:ABUSE. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 03:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

help

I want to learn how to use wikipedia and I don't want to vandalise I just wanted to get some attention but I'm sorry and I'm sorry for vandalising my friend's page in any case can you show me how to be a constructive editor, where are some places I can go Thejunner (talk) 17:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Multiple reversions

How do you revert more than one edit at a time in Huggle? -- IRP ☎ 19:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Just go back to the first edit you want to revert. If you revert it all following are also reverted. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 19:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

My edit to Mormonism

How was my edit to Mormonism biased? If you are familiar with LDS beliefs you know the accuracy of my information. I'll make it less colloquial but I'm going to add it again because it is a vital difference between Evangelical Christianity and Mormonism. With respect, I don't think you're generalized excuse of dubious unsourced material and non-neutrality is reason to revert my post, which expresses actual doctrine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebestlaidplans (talk • contribs) 19:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Keyshia Cole

• You're edit on Keyshia Cole had nothing to do with the Cheetah Girls "TCG" album.—Preceding unsigned comment added by LAUGH90 (talk • contribs)

I don't see no edit of mine to Keyshia Cole [5] If ya talk about the album, I just reverted two edits by an anon IP. And please sign your contributions to talk pages in the future, thx! --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 20:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Maury Ornest

An article that you have been involved in editing, Maury Ornest, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maury Ornest. Thank you. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 20:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

LollyPop

I didn't vandalize the LollyPop page as you said. I just updated the informations which are true to my knowledge. Without proper knowledge please don't dare to accuse or threaten me... jst007 (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Can you please give sources for your updates? Thx! --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 21:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, and you might not use too much of my talk page on yours... *lol* --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 22:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

My reference is from a newspaper. The issue is of November 16,2008 Sunday supplement of Malayala Manorama. jst007 (talk) 01:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

blaze42

why is it vadilsim Jamie1130 (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi! Please use the user's talk page instead of the user page! --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 21:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

My user page

Wow, thanks for your speedy 1 minute vandalism revert made by the user Jamie1130! I'm not sure how/if I can, but if I could, I would give you a badge. Thanks again - much appreciated! Blaze42 (talk) 21:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

"No big!" --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 21:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I Dont Understand

I Dont Understand Your Comment You Left Me Jamie1130 (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Slow down?

What exactly is happening? :P Blaze42 (talk) 22:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

This: kinda thang... --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 22:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't know what happened there - I don't even use IE, let alone version 4! :S I use FF 3. Sorry about that! Blaze42 (talk) 22:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind! *lol* --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 22:30, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Helpfulweasal

The user is obviously not acting in bad faith. Any chance of a retraction of your only warning? Seems a little harsh to me, the user is merely trying to get acquainted with RfA, it seems, and whilst it is not exactly constructive the user seems undeserving of an only warning to me. — neuro^(talk) 23:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

He got lvl3 only half an hour ago by User:TheLetterM . Already got lvl4 in July. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 23:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Old Livonia

Hi -hexaChord, just letting you now that I had to revert your edit [6] the redirect made by 82.181.2.75 makes sense, unlike the opinions that keep calling it vandalism. It would help if articles were actually read before making any editorial decisions. Thanks!--Termer (talk) 03:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, seems to. Saw this edit and just did the same. Sorry. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 06:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Dr Robotnik/ Dr Eggman

Hello. Sorry about the revert war going on over the Robotnik/Eggman issue. I would really like us to come to a constructive conclusion over this. I believe the charicters name is Robotnik though of course I know that recent games call him Eggman. I do feel that in references to the older games he should be refered to as Robotnik or Eggman/Robotnik. I know when I play the games I battle Dr Ivo Robotnik at the end of a level. I have been a Sonic superfan for over 10 years collecting everything Sonic so I do know my stuff.

Know you disagree with my changes. Personally I would want to see the article split into 2 seperate ones that use different names. Hope we can resolve this.

Error96

Sorry, but I can't say anything to article itself and saw it only while vandal fighting. You may discuss everything about the article and its content on the talk page, but please do not do big / undiscussed edits to the article. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 19:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Good Eye

On Cartoon Network (United States). I was just getting ready to make that change after leaving the warning, and you beat me to it.Yachtsman1 (talk) 21:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Kilbarchan

Why was my edit classed as vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JesusChrist=Legend (talk • contribs) 22:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok, looks like you're right. Sorry. Please sign your contributions to talk pages with four tildes in the future. Thanks. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 22:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

ARollins

This guy doesn't give up. I noticed you left warnings on his talk page - he's removed the same info two or three times since. Any chance of some respite from this guy? Thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Clover?

What was your concern with doing this revert?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clover_(creature)&diff=next&oldid=252675341

I'm not really a contributor to this page, I'm just curious. --Isaac R (talk) 00:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

May have been an error on my side. Sorry. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 12:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration

Please note that I have referred User:Jörg ÖA to the Arbitration Committee for their consideration. I have listed you as a party in the dispute. Let me know if you would not like to be involved. The request can be found at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Edits by User:Jörg ÖA. You may add a statement of 500 words in this section that describes your experiences. --Linkswechsel (talk) 05:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:67.210.164.158

Hi, I've removed your warning from User talk:67.210.164.158 because the user was editing in good faith. You can see the discussion on my talk page. Thanks! DARTH PANDA^duel 01:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

President of the United States of Sims

Thanks for fixing that, still a newbie at this.TheGunn (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Prevention

How exactly do you stop a copyrighted trademark logo you uploaded from being deleted? Please respond on my talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twinsday (talk • contribs)

I did not upload a trademark logo so I don't have to stop anything. But I guess vandalism is not the best way to not get in trouble. Plus, you may sign your contributions to talk pages in the future. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 18:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

You may want to be more careful with what you call vandalism, this user appears to be a good faith user. Regards, — neuro^(talk) 07:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Maybe I'm wrong but that doesn't look much like good faith. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 10:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

List of Squirrel Boy episodes

Hello. Is there a reason you broke the preceeding season table in order to re-add an empty season three table on the List of Squirrel Boy episodes article? It would appear that you broke it four times ([7], [8], [9], [10]) in fifteen minutes. --Kralizec! (talk) 19:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes, looks a bit strange if you see it outside Huggle. I just happened to see this and did believe it. Sorry. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 19:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Glad to hear it was a mistake. You have done some excellent anti-vandalism work here lately, but please be careful when using automated tools like Huggle, as mistakes like this are really frowned upon. --Kralizec! (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

ps: see User talk:201.92.171.100 --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 19:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that inappropriately high level warning when I declined the AIV report [11]. That warning combined with your mistaken reverts led another admin to block the IP for 31 hours. Luckily the other admin reversed the block after I requested that he review the edits in question more closely. Unfortunately this untimely combination of mistakes from all three editors has no doubt resulted in a very well bitten IP. --Kralizec! (talk) 20:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Edits to Greatest Hits, Vol. 1 (Korn album)

uh, my edit reverted an incorrect edit. Now you've reverted it it describes an Adema album? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.238.177.84 (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok, fixed. Sorry. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 21:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Ashbey_{…whisper…} 22:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

"No big!"--Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 03:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

willchil help!

hi , yes , this is the person who modified the flea article recently, sandbox did not help me and i'm still having trouble. i just wanted to change the picture , i know there is a copyright rule , but thats my problem . what am i not doing right ? does it have to do with copyright? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willchill (talk • contribs) 16:47, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Look for a picture that really is copyright free. You may look at Flickr or other communities that give a detailed info on copyrights of the pictures uploaded. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 17:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page. Ollie Fury _Contribs 01:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

you both have been reported. this is a legit comment in a legit manner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.129.170.102 (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

just curious, are you going to explain yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:69.129.170.102 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.129.170.102 (talk) 01:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

I think this little misunderstanding has been resolved. See IP talk for details. Ollie Fury _Contribs 02:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for restoring my user page. Keep up the good work! Willking1979 (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

"No big!"--Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 03:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

You're german

Damn!!! That one was good!!! Ps: I like Germany, such a nice country. No, seriously. 190.25.194.128 (talk) 02:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

So be careful... Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 03:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Party of Animals

Hi, this is Gregory Feeley. The entry on Party of Animals is full of bizarre, disparaging misinformation. I rewrote it, explaining in the Discussion page why I did so, and am now being threatened with expulsion or something.

The book's author, Harold Brodkey, was a contentious figure, and lots of people have hostile feelings about him. The author of that post seems to be one of them. I have no dog in any fight over Harold Brodkey; I simply corrected some errors of fact. If you want to delete my corrections and throw me out, go ahead. I write books and reference works for a living and, really, don't have to donate my efforts here.

Gregory Feeley (talk) 03:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

I've got nothing to do with Mr. Brodkey or his works, I just see that you have been warned several times before and still remove content from the article. If there is a dispute with other users, this should be solved before you're making big changes on the article again. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 03:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

for fixing my userpage. :) WadeSimMiser (talk) 03:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

"No big!"--Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 03:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For repairing vandalism to my user page. --John (talk) 04:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

"No big!" --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 18:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

List of Second ladies

Please remember that it's a list of Second ladies, not First ladies of the US. So it's the wives of the Vice Presidents. Calle Widmann (talk) 08:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Can not s.o. set up this list right to stop this stupid edit war that's going on for ages? --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 18:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

South Korea

Hello. I am currently involved in a dispute in the South Korea article. The article is littered with peacock terms, references given do not properly back up the statements given. I have tried to discuss with the other person, but we seem to be getting no-where. I would appreciate your assistance. Thankyou. Colliver55 (talk) 18:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to help but am not much into the topic. Please try WP:M ---Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 18:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Supernerd123456

If you have administrative powers, a user that you have giving a level 4 warning to has self admitted to being a vandal (and sockpuppet). [12] -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't have. And I really don't wanna have... ;-) --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 20:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Jennifer Korbee Talk Page

There was no vandalism...do we really need that conversation staining the article? JennFan24 (talk) 23:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

You may move it to an archive then. But don't just blank the page, please.--Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 23:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion

I would get rid of the "say headcheese" in your signature. While it is entirely your choice, I think it looks a bit odd when tacked on to your template warnings when you are using Huggle. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 00:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I think I've seen worse signatures in my life. Why does it offend you? Or is it just because you don't like me anyway? I never wanted to do much vandal fighting and might stop it in the near future. Was lots of fun in the beginning and is still fun but also unnerving sometimes. So you'll get rid of me soon I guess. BTW: It's an inside joke. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 00:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I suspect he's just offering friendly advice. Protonk (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

We have reason to doubt it.--Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 00:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok. I can't imagine that he would make that suggestion out of disdain or an interest in pushing your from the project. I presume you have some reason to not AGF. Guess that's between you two. Protonk (talk) 01:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

:O Did I really come across that I was attacking you? Oh my god, I'm sorry. I didn't intend anything close to that. I am not in the least offended by your signature, not even close, I was only giving you a suggestion. I didn't even expect you to reply at all, (more than maybe an "OK" or "I'd rather not change it") much less read my note as an attack, so I went to fill out a request for checkuser, and neglected to add your talk page to my watchlist.
Geez, why did you think I wanted you to stop using Huggle? You are one of the best, most accurate people using that tool, from what I have seen. I have seen utterly no reason why you should not use the tool.
I'm not really sure what I have done in the past that involved you, that would make you think I did not like you, but I give you my word of honor that I have harbored nothing but positive thoughts regarding you or your contributions. Wow, I cannot fully express how much of a misunderstanding this is. God, I'm sorry. :/ J.delanoy^gabs_adds 02:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I was just dropping by to make a similar comment - your automated messages on this guy's talk page lack the leading double-hyphen (which I assume is what J.delanoy was trying to say), so it looks like "Say Headcheese!" is an emphatic end to the paragraph, rather than part of your signature. Given that the word 'headcheese' has another, more offensive meaning, I read it as a cheerily unpleasant "gotcha!", which might not be your intention. All credit to you for fighting the good fight against vandalism, though. --McGeddon (talk) 20:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

I won't use Huggle anymore. This should calm down most of you. I'm sorry for hurting you. Plus, I will give back my rollback rights because it'll be the only way to prevent me from using the tool. Additionally I will overthink my presence here, what may take a few days I guess. I will not do much contributions in the meanwhile though. I really hope it won't disturb you too much. --Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 18:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Talk page

Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 18:08, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

"No big!"----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 18:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks HexaChord

Hey year thanks for pointing out where to experiment. By the way how did you know i was letting myself hack away at the page, after all i just uploaded it.  FaranjiPyrard 19:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

It's a kind of magic----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 19:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Jonas Bros.

Please tell me how that edit I made was vandilism ??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by John1200 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I had to delete it because it was unsourced and biased (-> POV). If you find a reliable source for your statement you can edit it in again. ----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 21:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Why did you undo my edit to the Perils of Pauline page?

Why did you undo my edit to the The Perils of Pauline (1914 serial) page? You said it was "vandalism" and that I provided no information as to why I made the update. I did in fact try my best to provide an explanation within the 200 word limit.

There are several longstanding rumors about this film which go back to the 1930's-1940's time frame. There is no reason for rumors or "urban legends" about films to be repeated on wikipedia. In this particular case, a private company has been claiming a "famous" scene from this film was made along their rail line. That info along with links for this company were on this wikipedia page. The problem is that the scene they are alluding to was ever in this film.

I have made several attempts to delete bogus information on this and another old film, only to have people not knowledgable of the subject matter revert the pages back and accuse me of vanadlism.

I am not angry, just a bit frustrated that sincere attemps to improve the accuracy of this resource have been so quickly slapped down.

98.169.176.69 (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

The problem is: You don't have a source for your statement. I don't know if you're right or not but the section in the article has a source. Find a good source or ask for one on the article's talkpage. ----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 21:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I am not adding info into the body of the article itself which would need a cited source. I thought the best way to deal with a rumor is to just not mention them at all. The problem is that this company has made a false claim on a website which is then cited as a source.

Surely there must be a wikipedia method to handle this? Otherwise every false claim on the internet on any subject could be added to wikipedia and there would be no possible method to remove it. There can't be "correction" sources to cite for every rumor that can be cited on the internet on any subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.176.69 (talk) 21:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't realize I wasn't signed in

Sorry, I wiped my User Page forgot to sign in Crew90 (talk) 22:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok.----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 22:18, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Denver Jade Fowler

Hello, I created that 'disenbugation thing' by accident...can you delete it for me? Also I need help with the denver Jade Fowler article. It is my first...Can you help with it. I wanted to do a box top right like other actor and musician wikipedia pages. I can seem to figure it out. I am getting better though. Thanks, Laura--Lauraskaiser (talk) 23:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

The first is tagged for deletion so it may dissapear soon. Your second wish, ehm, I don't know Denver Jade Fowler so I can't help much I guess. If you have problems with formatting the page you should just steal a suitable style from another page and fill in your content. That's how I started. You'll learn everything else with time. ----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 23:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism on Pinky Dinky Doo

I don't believe this edit on Pinky Dinky Doo constitutes vandalism. Based on the nature of the program, it seems likely that the show WOULD air an episode on embarassment caused by bad breath. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thx, I'm glad it's not airing in Europe - AFAIK... ----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 20:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Pyrrhus page. That was appreciated. Have a very merry Christmas and a happy New Year!--Xenovatis (talk) 18:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

"No big!" Merry X-mas! ----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 18:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Arctic Lemur

The article fits under no speedy criteria. Also, all animal species are notable. Schuym1 (talk) 19:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I looked it up and it is made up. I will tag it was vandalism. Schuym1 (talk) 19:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

That's what I'm saying... ----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 19:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sure, if it only existed...----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 19:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey!!

Um what you DELETED was not vandalism ummmm I WROTE IT!!! It was on MY PAGE.... Can you put it back... I put in over TWO HOURS of work on that to have you go and take it offCjschll (talk) 19:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Still there. ;-)----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 19:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Ya because I went back and had to find it and copy and paste it all...Cjschll (talk) 19:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Why don't you use the sandbox for testing, or create the article first in your user space and move it to the correct space when you're ready?----Say Headcheese!-hexaChord² 19:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

3RR

Heya, you're at three reverts at Antony Flew, please be careful of WP:3RR? --Elonka 22:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

You're kidding, aren't you?----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 10:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Anthony Flew poll

Hi, I've started a poll at Talk:Antony_Flew#Fully protected for three days. Please would you post on which version of the introduction you prefer.

Thanks,

— Hyperdeath^(Talk) 00:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

reads like an advertisement

hi - you recently reverted an edit i made to the Sean Combs entry. I flagged it as an ad based on the same criteria used to gut an article i have worked very hard on re: Majora Carter. It looks like there is double standard for male rappers who support violence and misogyny vs female civil rights activists who are not trying to sell cologne and remixes. givechase on dec 22, 9:00pm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Givechase (talk • contribs) 02:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't think much about Mr. Sean Combs but I guess you should discuss the add on the talkpage first. ----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 10:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, I just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Happy Holidays! -- Luke4545 (talk) 02:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

"No big!"----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 10:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Springnuts

Hi, Thanks for your anti-vandalism work, however I don't think your good faith deletion of the message on my talk page was appropriate. We need to be careful with Huggle. Springnuts (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

"Thank God It's Christmas"...----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 14:04, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Not vandalism attempt

I'm sure you are aware that it was not my intent to vandalize. --Feeling free (talk) 15:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, if I missed the joke. ----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 15:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

All I was trying to do was to point out that Christmas Eve is currently being celebrated. I was not trying to deliberately do something bold. --Feeling free (talk) 16:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia is neither a news ticker nor a calendar. That's like updating the market value of companies based on stocks every day.----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 11:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Use of Huggle

Hi - please be careful when using Huggle. You reverted this diff [[13]] and warned the editor for vandalism - though the edit has a full edit summary justifying it. It may be a poor edit; it is not vandalism. We all need to remember not to bite the newbies. Regards, Springnuts (talk) 16:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

I think this topic was discussed earlier here. Plus, the edit was done shortly after this one. I don't know the truth. ----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 22:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

RE:Prison Break

If you look at the edit history, I undid two blatant errors in the introduction of the article. Not constructive? Hardly. 75.39.80.243 (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

You removed a citation tag without comment which I reverted. I saw you repaired a reference tag an edit earlier but when I wanted to restore that my software crashed. It was fixed faster than I could get onto it again so I just moved on. ----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 22:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

My New BFF "Vandalism"

I'm sorry, but if you take a look at Paris Hilton's My New BFF and the page as it currently is, you will see that it is vandalised with many unnecessary objects on the contestant status list. For example, the heart next to Onch's name?

Please do not revert again unless you have a valid reason. Merry Christmas! 71.14.96.235 (talk) 02:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

And what's this?----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 02:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

An edit which had nothing to do with my discussion about my supposed vandalism on Paris Hilton's My New BFF. Stay on topic, please. 71.14.96.235 (talk) 02:20, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Zeta Phi Beta edits

Dear HexaChord,

I deleted the information about the lawsuits, etc. under "Controversies" because it is information that is meant to be discussed only amongst sorority members. Also, the information is inaccurate and out-of-date. Will you PLEASE stop changing my edits regarding my sorority's history?

Happy Holidays, ZetaLady2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZetaLady2 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for watching my back! Geoff ^{T C} 17:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

"No big!"----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 21:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Mardi Gras

I was splitting the Mardi Gras page, as it said it needed. I moved the content to Mardi Gras in the United States. mynameinc 21:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, sorry, I noticed it a bit too late. I've restored everything as it should be. ----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 21:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Hoax

Hi hexachord- thanks for the welcome- but people should not be calling hoaxes after a living person's name- it spills over teh internet on searches. it is unfair to that innocent person- I'm just using the first innitialUpjoy (talk) 23:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't know the case but it just seemed a bit strange to me.----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 02:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/LYKOMGIMATOTTLETWILITEFANNE

Could you please block or ban this user (if you're an admin) for their edit to the Twilight talk page? ムーカオズルール^{(Talk to Moo)} 01:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

On its way. ----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 02:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't realize you weren't an admin. moocowsrule^{(Talk to Moo)} 02:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

I AM THE GRINCH (talk · contribs)

I indef blocked him as a vandalism-only account. He won't trouble you anymore. – ClockworkSoul 02:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

How sad, it was such a nice nickname...----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 02:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Too true. I wish I had thought of it. – ClockworkSoul 03:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Look before you leap

I'm sorry that I was not logged in when I edited the Zune article, but you should have been more careful when reverting my recent edit for being "unconstructive." Did you actually read the edit? - MajorB <talk> <contribs> - —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC).

Can you give a source? Sounds strange.----Merry Headcheese!-hexaChord² 23:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello my friend, I guess you already noticed that it's indeed true - but to support your "Sounds strange": Here you find a funny-written German article [14] with the quote "eine so bizarre Geschichte, verrückter als Fiktion" and here is the original English quote: "a fact-is-stranger-than-fiction story" [15].

Headcheese ;-) --Cyfal (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

It was the "before 2012" part that made me tumble over...----Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

The next leap year... :-) --Cyfal (talk) 22:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, sure, but looked like a bad joke on poor Microsoft at first - at least I thought that. This company is worse than I can imagine...--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Consensus

I'm reverting your edit to the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election since most of the users have agreed to the use of a map gallery. I'm adding in that reasoning to the edit summary. -- Frightwolf (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Emp1990

Hi and happy new year why exactly did u undo my last changes and on what authority? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emperor 1990 (talk • contribs) 03:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

If you ask me those changes just look very strange and since they alter the article in so many ways you should first discuss this on the article's talkpage.----Happy new Headcheese!-hexaChord² 04:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Contribute equals Vandalism

I guess you're an overworked and probably upaid volunteer wanting to protect the wiki community, and I appreciate that. Occasionally I contribute something to a wiki, and most times it just ends up summarily deleted by someone who doesn't follow the recommendation on this talk page to "assume good faith." I'm sad about that, because to me it means wiki still hasn't grown into a mature tool for collaborative information sharing. Just in case you actually read this, and are interested in feedback, please convey to your team my refreshed disappointment in and fading hope for wiki. I have no interest in advertising or selling anything, nor in adding inaccurate info to wiki. If you have some sort of Detested Contributor List, feel free to add me so as to save us all some time by immediately and automatically deleting anything I'm moved to share. That way I can move from inspired to discouraged more quickly. :) Jw4nvc (talk) 04:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't know your problems but you still can upload your copyrighted photos to Wikimedia Commons. BTW: I've got nothing to do with Upaid.----Happy new Headcheese!-hexaChord² 05:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

My problem is wanting ease in contributing to wiki, and you presumably want ease in maintaining it. It's much easier for me to put in external links to those of my photos others might enjoy, than to dig into posting them directly in wiki and sorting out the legalities of that. If my adding them as external links is a problem for you, no worries. While they're copyrighted, that's only for my ease in preventing others from making money on them. I make nothing (zero) when someone follows a link to freely view and download them for Fair Use.

Deleted from my Talk page (still there in History naturally):

Of course this single edit does not constitute vandalism but since our friend did several similiar edits without reacting it was the only way to stop him.----Happy new Headcheese!-hexaChord² 05:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm glad to have clarity on this being the way wiki responds to a "friend" trying to contribute. I might get hopeful again sometime and try contributing to see if it's gotten any easier, but meanwhile consider me stopped. Hope the coming year brings us all much happiness and many welcome challenges. :) Jw4nvc (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, if you want it that easy of course you can have it that easy. As mentioned before you might have a look on pages like WP:EL, WP:COI, MOS:LINK etc. It will ease your wiki life, be sure! ----Happy new Headcheese!-hexaChord² 05:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd prefer having this discussion on just one talkpage and not on three - with you deleting one of them constantly. That would make things more easy I guess.----Happy new Headcheese!-hexaChord² 05:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

The Story of the Foolish J

Hi. Please take note that books, albums, software etc., or schools, are not eligible under this criterion. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 05:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Oops, sorry.----Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 05:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Help

Someone hacked my account and I've seen all what they did. Those are hoax article and they did 2 hoax article. Macy Garcia and Binibining Amazona. Their sources are empty hotlinks and I don't want to be filed a case by Gilda Olvidados. So I want to delete that article immediately. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GMA Divo (talk • contribs) 08:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 09:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Here document

As "unconstructive" as the particular edit I made to the Here documents page was, there was no need to revert it. Humor is how people stay awake while reading about such things as computer programming. Since the part that I edited was merely an example, it did no harm to the article itself and the subtle joke might have made someone laugh at some point in the future. If you'd like to explain to me how how changing the occupation of an example character (who happened to already be named Joe) from a programmer to a plumber would hinder someone's learning about here docs then please, share. The example is poorly written anyway... It has Joe first learning about the topic then being the "go-to guy" on the subject a line later. If you want to do something useful then fix the example but don't ruin other's fun simply because you lack the basic art of humor. Danman111111 (talk) 12:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi there! Which edit do ou mean? You may be right but let me take a look on it please. If you're talking about this on, ehm, is that really that important?----Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 17:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Listen

I thank you for the effort, and I know that reverting vandalism is hard work, but it doesn't justify stupidity. If you look at the warnings on that IP page, you will see that they all pertain to User:Rimush/Sandbox. I don't always sign in when I edit my Sandbox. I even posted a message at the top of my IP's talk page. You seem to have somehow missed it twice already. I'm writing this so that I don't get a ban on my IP. And one more thing: how in the world do you "vandalize" a Sandbox? The whole purpose of a Sandbox is to experiment with edits. Rimush (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for that. Me and others use a tool to find and revert vandalism and therefore we not even vist most talkpages. Additionally you've been warned before by another vandal fighter - what of course does not make the case better. ;-) I removed the warnings but I guess you'll be warned again when editing your Userspace as an anon IP.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page Camw (talk) 02:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

"No big!"--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 03:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

IP 125.

You need to be careful with that IP. They change blue linked categories to red linked ones like this. Of course they can't create the category, howver in this case the redlinked category already contained 24 articles so it was worthwhile creating but often they just make one or two. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 04:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 04:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Aberta

I see, he was fizing broken links. See I thought he was placing spam sites round the article, I can now see these are good faith edits. Thanks for the heads up. :) Andy (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 08:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for sorting it out. And oohh for your comment here! :) Andy (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

ok

is that- why is it vandalism? it was at the bottom of the page, you know. I'm not trying to start anything. I need more context. please fill me in or have someone fill me in. thx. Headlikeawhole (talk) 21:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, it was my fault. I restored your edit.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC):

overzealous bot? Headlikeawhole (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Nope, finger.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

List of European Supercentenarians

What I did was remove three names beyond 30 (named 26, 27 and 28) in the list of "30 oldest European Supercentenarians". I'm sure they weren't supposed to be there, so your revert wasn't really helping. It's all moot by now though since it has all changed considerably since. Cheers.Yubiquitoyama (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, yes, rather confusing altogether. ;-)--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Use of underlines in wiki links

Just a note, or maybe a reminder, that when adding wiki links please remember to change the underlines to spaces. Refering to your recent edit[16]

• Darrell_Roberts (Five_Finger_Death_Punch) which should be
• Darrell Roberts (Five Finger Death Punch)

I have already made the correction. Thanks for your participation in Wikipedia Dbiel ^(Talk) 22:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Oops, didn't see that when trying to correct it myself [17]. Thank you!--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep up the good work. Vandalism is sure a big pain to keep up with. Dbiel ^(Talk) 21:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Hello. I noticed today that you were doing newpages patrolling but are not marking some of the pages you visit as patrolled. Though this is not mandatory in any way, and should not be done for all newpages, where appropriate it keeps your fellow patrollers from wasting time reviewing the same page multiple times. In any event, keep up the good work! Thanks. --Dynaflow babble 12:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work on cleaning up vandalism; you beat me to reverting vandalism by 75.39.82.22 on the article Irish Wolfhound. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 13:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your help at my user test page. Khuntien Ngin (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

"No big!"--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 14:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Vehicle registration plates of Kazakhstan

Would you please reconsider my article and probably remove it from those for speedy deletion because it is truly WIKI article translated from Russian Wiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niazza (talk • contribs) 14:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Done.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 14:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niazza (talk • contribs) 15:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

"No big!"--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, HexaChord. You have new messages at Slown63's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

response

Hello, HexaChord. You have new messages at Aka042's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dear 'Chord'

You sent me a very kind note regarding a useful Barry Bearak edit I made. "Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Barry Bearak has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 22:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)" I've been editing Wikipedia for years, so thanks for the welcome. Let me give you an example of the various problems with the page.

The very last sentence of the page is: "On occasion, Barry will eat a random assortment of berries. Never in color order" This is completely random. But I guess you, Mr. Administrator, don't want any help in editing. So I'm done with Wikipedia. --67.84.207.247 (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, if you're editing for years why are you destroying my talk page then?[18] A pro like you should know where to hit the "new section" button, shouldn't he? Next, I'm no Admin and don't want to be one. There's yet enough neurotics around on Wikipedia. I guess these are very important statements [19] [20] [21] But again, what exactly is your disorder?--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 00:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Got any problems?

I see you're on huggle right now. Are you experiencing these problems with warnings and revert info? Chamal ^talk 11:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting some Vandalism on my talk page, much appreciated! Renaissancee (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

"No big!"--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:19, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

User: JustinRubin1971

Hello. Sorry to interrupt your Huggling, but I just wanted to make you aware of a recent edit, here, which you identified as vandalism. I'm not sure whether this was a case of vandalism - the users intention isn't to mess things up. (What he is here for is a different story.) I know it was probably a simple mistake, I just wanted to keep you informed. Cheers! » \ / (⁂) 13:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

It was vandalism since he removed the tag by CorenSearchBot.[22][23]--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 13:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Nabha

I assume I am doing the right thing by removing the advertising that User talk:Manavdeep and User talk:59.94.253.232 (who may be the same person) keep adding. Do you agree? --| Uncle Milty | talk | 14:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, sure.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 14:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Pages getting deleted

I'm trying in good faith to add information to the wiki and before I have the chance to hit save I'm getting pages deleted. I believe I need a disambiguation page for Richard Lynch as THERE ARE MORE THAN ONE. I set up the disambiguation page, moved the current content to Richard Lynch (Actor) and added a second link to Richard Lynch (Photoshop Author). Everything was reverted/deleted within about a minute.

If you don't allow contributions, there is no way the wiki can grow and be accurate. A little patience between creating the page and deletions might also be useful as there may need to be updates...

Please let me know what is going on: thebookdoc@aol.com

Thebookdoc (talk) 15:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Actually, you should have moved Richard Lynch to Richard Lynch (actor) to save the article's edit history. I fixed that for you. Another possibility would have been a short tag on top of the article like the one on Brian Carroll. Edit summaries are welcomed, too.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 15:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page. Best regards, Húsönd 18:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

"No big!"--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 18:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Wut?

Dude, what is the big deal with personal attacks? I though this website had no limits. --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

See your talkpage.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

But what if the user is a lesbian? Then what? --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

"Pigs Are People Too".--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

next time, just speak Japanese, I would understand that better than the reason why you posted that link, and you still have not answered my question FULLY. --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 22:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, I don't know what horse shit has to do with lesbians either.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Maybe nothing, except for the fact that she is (no offense) a bag of horse shit AND a lesbian both. However horse shit ON ITS OWN and lesbian ON ITS OWN have no correlation other than the fact that User: Reliable Forever is both of those. (JUST SAYING WHAT SHE IS) --Got a 69 in my wine (talk) 23:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

81.106.204.64

I am pretty sure that this, and similar edits like it, were entirely constructive. Whether they were a good idea is open to debate, but the correct course of action is not to revert their edits and issue a vandalism warning. You seem to have persuaded them to stop contributing, which is a shame. Please be more careful. Thanks -- Gurch (talk) 11:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, you may be right. Dunno what I've done before, must have been something heated. Sorry. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 16:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Library computers

Please do not suspend this account's privileges. The IP address used for this account is that of a public high school. There is plethora of separate computers in this building(all with the same IP address), which anyone can use.

--68.119.97.7 (talk) 13:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi there! I think I'm not the right address to complain, just follow the steps laid down on your talkpage.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 16:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

User: RedRose333

Despite numerous "final warnings" and threats of blocking, User: RedRose333 is still at it full speed ahead. I hope that someone such as yourself will take action. Thanks. 24.176.191.234 (talk) 05:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

User: Jg01

I notified you about User: RedRose333, who had been made numerous (and some unnecessary) edits on the Sonny Bono entry before moving on to other pages. Now a User: Jg01 is doing the exact same thing on the Mary Bono page. This is a new user, so perhaps this is a sockpuppet also. I am a semi-experienced user, but not so much as to always know where to report things. (and I'm on my work computer today and cannot sign in, lest I get in trouble, even though I'm doing this on my lunch hour.) Thanks. 24.176.191.234 (talk) 06:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Bella

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Just a little something to say thanks for all of the AIV reports you have made :) ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 17:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I gotta thank you!--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 17:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

AIV reports

Whats with all the AIV reports for IPs and users with either no edits at all or no edits in weeks? Tan | 39 18:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, my contributions list says I didn't edit for about half an hour. But I'm sure I did. Bug?--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 18:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, looks like some sort of server lag. Carry on. :-) Tan | 39 18:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Indexsales and User:Sartan 100

They seem to be very related. What should I do? RJaguar3 | u | t 19:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I dunno, as long as they just spam their user pages...--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 19:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

hi

what is your problem ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.127.20 (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, what is yours?--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment

Ahem...flake..... ahem. Sorry... had to clear my throat. :-D The Real Libs-speak politely 20:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Means what? He's a resident troll, I know.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 20:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

ps: Have look here: [24]! --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 15:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Slipknot

If you edit the article slipknot again I will consider it vandalism and report it as such. MahoganyCow (talk) 05:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

As long as you are working against consensus on the talkpage I don't fear a vandalism report.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 12:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

ps: I hope you also report User:Fair Deal and User:Wiki libs, not only me.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 15:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Huggle

Hi there, Please see the download page for the new release of huggle. It should work and should be the only version to work. Thank Xclamation point and if you have any questions please get to me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. --·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 21:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Newsletters

I removed some of the content in your newsletter as it is not important and not to the point, and the image is way too large. It is common courtesy when posting newsletters not to use huge images, and only use information relevant to what you are telling them about. The stuff I removed was not in anyway useful.--Otterathome (talk) 00:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi there! Can you show me a policy you're basing this on? What common courtesy you're talking about? Sorry, but you're not a member of the project and therefore you may not know what is relevant or not for the project. Is it a good idea to interefere in "foreign business" then?--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 01:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

See WP:CANVASSING and Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.--Otterathome (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

WP:CANVAS is not about newsletters, it deals with solicitation. The newsletter is for members, not for potential members. We have {{User TFBH3}} for this. I didn't find anything at WP:TPG, can you point me to the particular sections? BTW: Have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Newsletters, other newsletters also have big headers.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 01:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

If I haven't said it before (and I don't think I have?)....

You create one of THE BEST project newsletters of any music related project on Wikipedia! Hands down. It has an excellent look to it with that nice large image of B_head at the top right. And it is both informative about the project activities/to-do's + it is an entertaining read as well with just the right amount of humour. Hopefully no one makes any negative comments about it or tries to change it in any way because right now it is absolutely perfect. Keep up the excellawesomenities! The Real Libs-speak politely 13:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

LOL, thx...--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 17:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Great now I will get nothing done for the rest of my day 'cause I will be too distracted by my new shiny! :-D. Thanks!!!! The Real Libs-speak politely 17:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Evil me.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 18:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

How!

How are my things inappropriate!--IceRules (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Apparently bad warning

Here [25] you warn an editor about introducing inappropriate external links, yet in the diff you provide a link to I cannot see an external link. DuncanHill (talk) 22:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, sorry, clicked the wrong template on Huggle.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Will you then remove the warning please? DuncanHill (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Why? It's much more fun to bite noobs.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

keeps on trying to ban me

This person keeps on tryingto ban me. It's true, you can find how aircraft doors operate on youtube, by searching"Boeing 747 Door Opening." i've also forwarded this message to ARGHHHS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.131.122 (talk) 22:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Who's "this person"?--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

I've been reversed twinkled

Thanks - actually, I was just about to head over to TW help as I'm not seeing any new tabs. The my monobook seems ok:

.mw-plusminus-pos {display: none;}
.mw-plusminus-neg {display: none;}
.mw-plusminus-null {display: none;}
.history-size {display: none;}
importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js');

I did the full refresh, and exited/restarted FireFox (ver 3.0.6) but still nothing. I need to work on another project for a while and so will leave your "present" on my home page for now. When I have time I'll dig around to see where TW is. I also did a view-source and there are no references to AzaToth or twinkle. --Marc Kupper|talk 00:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Strange, it should work. My monobook looks exactly the same, just copied from the project's site.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 00:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reverts!

Hello. Thank you for the reverts ([26], [27]) of my "fan club." Your speedy anti-vandal action is much appreciated! Thanks! Kralizec! (talk) 00:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

"No big!"--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 00:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to User:Marc_Kupper. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. There is no "Use of proper humor option". I could not get TW working via the monobook method but Preferences / Gadgets works. Now I need to figure out enabling FireFox pop-ups. It tried to pop-up your talk page and before I could hit the options button something timed out and so I went here manually. Thank you - TW certainly speeds up the process. --Marc Kupper|talk 06:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC) --Marc Kupper|talk 06:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

"No big!"--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 14:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

BTW - I don't know if you saw the thing over on TW help but my monobook issue got fixed. The install doc had a link to monobook.js and as it was a blue link I assumed it was to monobook.css. Special:MyPage/This is a blue link is handled as a special form of redirect and they are always blue. --Marc Kupper|talk 12:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Happy to help.

Hey, thanks for the barnstar! If you need any help dealing with Portuguese language speakers, just contact me. Victor Lopes (talk) 22:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Frank Turner

Stop intefearing with my work on Frank Turner. please. thanks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by FrankFakeTurner (talk • contribs)

Sorry, no.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 19:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Reading? You expect me to READ?!

oops: :) -- Avi (talk) 19:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Nina333

Hey! Let me edit things without repercussion!!!--Nina333 (talk) 10:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

??? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 13:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

80.144.62.71

hey, this was serious! A Article about a album should contain a description of the cover. Sorry, these person really look like Kim jong il and Mao in my oppinion. Of course i this is odd, but i haven't found a discription and i wanted to start a discussion. (BTW: This is just how i interpret the cover; This was not meant to be a (crude) political statment. --80.144.62.71 (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

If it was serious, it still was original research. I doubt there's any reliable sources saying something about the cover. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 17:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Mahaveerprabu

FYI - I changed the vandalism tag you left with User talk:Mahaveerprabu to a SD removal tag. Thanks for catching the removal. ttonyb1 (talk)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) It was one of the more unusual ones. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Rather amusing, yes. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 23:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! Nice to see others rally against the trolls. Zclone (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Jones Lang LaSalle

Hi HexaChord, pls help look into this, thanks

• User talk:Pamarro251
• Talk:Jones Lang LaSalle
• Jones Lang LaSalle

Pamarro251 (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

What exactly do you want to point to? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 12:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Maybe she wants to know if there's wikipedia policy against paid employees writing their company wikipedia entry, either that or she might want to know if her IP address is masked well enough to play sockpuppet for this week ;-) 121.44.27.172 (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC) Just some dude

Could you please play your puzzles on other editors' talkpages, e.g. your own? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 13:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I received some sort of warning (from somebody) about two things (me writing personal analysis and me putting up promotional material). Both of these make little sense to me. This is what I'm pointing to: if you want to warn me (i.e. telling me not to do something that violates or breaches some policies), go ahead, but please explain specifically what I should or should not do (i.e. which sentences that I wrote were not appropriate). Pamarro251 (talk) 04:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

On second thoughts, my apologies for the above tone as I am not too sure who was the one sending me the two messages on my talkpage. Anyway, a user on the Jones Lang LaSalle's talkpage (which appears to be the same as the user 121.44.27.172 above but I'm not too sure -- my apologies if I'm wrong) has violated several Wikipedia guidelines, including assuming good faith and positive tone, as well as making false allegations (i.e. vandalism). I suggest a warning be issued to this user. Pamarro251 (talk) 06:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Reversion on Guns N' Roses

You reverted a valid edit on this article here and you labeled it as vandalism. You clearly do not understand what WP:Vandalism is. I strongly suggest you read it. You actually reverted valid information. See this magazine article. You could probably find a better source if you tried. I suggest you apologize to 69.127.134.121 (talk · contribs) and strike the warning from the talk page. Toddst1 (talk) 01:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Welll, that is the point. The list is about "hard rock" and not "heavy metal". Note that GNR related articles get filled with unsourced "heavy metal" claims all the time. Also see this edit. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 01:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

The editor clearly has a problem with the difference between hard rock and heavy metal, but it was not vandalism. You're free to undo the edit, but labeling it vandalism isn't right at all. Toddst1 (talk) 02:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

This list is based upon internet votes [28], thus clearly failing WP:RS. I can withdraw my claim for "improper humour" and change it to "factual error" or, if a source is provided, "spam" - as you wish. I like "improper humour", though. It does not sound as harsh. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 02:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

You should know what vandalism is. The fact that VH1 ranked it #1 based on votes does not mean facts about the event aren't from WP:RS at all - you have to look at the source cited. You should know that too.

I have not seen a reliable source for that claim. The best thing I've seen so far was the VH1 site itself, where one can still vote.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 03:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

That being said, this good revert of yours was definitely vandalism and also a WP:BLP violation and could have easily warranted a uw-4im for defamation instead of improper humor.

I'm really not trying to bust your chops here, but these are important points - especially since you're a rollbacker. Toddst1 (talk) 03:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Just have a look at the history of Axl Rose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - you could block about half of the world for calling him a douchebag. But at least I do not warn the wrong editor as you did - if you want to play that kind of game... --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 03:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

We all make mistakes. I will make more. Some of us take responsibility for them. Based on the above discussion - specifically your reactions and lack of responsibility, I have removed rollback from this account. Toddst1 (talk) 03:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, we all make mistakes, but if this is the only answer you can give... Thank you. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 03:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, this is a sorry situation. I have come across HexaChord whilst monitoring AIV and always found their reports to be 100% accurate and appropriate, so if this is just an argument about a misplaced warning/edit summary which has resulted in their rollback rights being revoked, I think it is more of a loss to the community than a fitting "punishment". If you would like me to ask Toddst1 to reconsider, please let me know, HexaChord. – B.hotep •talk• 16:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)