Jump to content

User talk:IJBall/Archive 20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22→Archive 25

Question regarding the disambiguation of Lab Rats (U.S. TV series) – Is it necessary?

You're the expert here. Couldn't Lab Rats be disambiguated by year? (2012 TV series) for the US version and (2008 TV series) for the UK series.

Alternatively, based on your comment at User talk:IJBall/Archive 9#The After Party: One other thing – if notability is ultimately shown, I think the Draft article should actually be moved to The After Party. The latter is currently a redirect to an 8 Simple Rules episode, but an extant and airing TV series would almost certainly qualify as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and thus it should get the 'base title'. (The current redirect can be moved to The After Party (8 Simple Rules)...) I'm wondering if the same should apply here and the US series should just be under the base title of Lab Rats as most likely 99% of people searching for the name will be searching for the Disney XD series. The UK series only ran for six episodes and did not really seem to get any major coverage. Likewise for Lab Rats (film), which is full of WP:REDNOT violations. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

OK, based on page views – [1] – Lab Rats (U.S. TV series) does appear to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Lab Rats" (and seems to be sufficiently disambiguated from Laboratory rat so as not to be a problem). Based on this, yes – I think a WP:Requested move discussion could be opened to move Lab Rats (U.S. TV series) → Lab Rats.
As to your first question, most of us in WP:NCTV feel that "by country" disambiguation is pretty much always preferred over "by year" disambiguation, whenever possible, because readers will be more familiar with the "by country" designations. So, Lab Rats (U.S. TV series) and Lab Rats (UK TV series) are definitely preferred over Lab Rats (2012 TV series) and Lab Rats (2008 TV series)... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Done: Talk:Lab Rats (U.S. TV series)#Requested move: August 16, 2018. This is my first time, so I just followed your requested move at Talk:Jessie (2011 TV series)#Requested move 15 June 2017 for help and as an outline. Hopefully I got it. Inviting Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968 to the discussion. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
@Amaury: I've had to revert, as you need to use {{Requested move}} to do this. Also you do not need to !vote "support" as the nominator – that is assumed. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Now it's done. New link: Talk:Lab Rats (U.S. TV series)#Requested move 16 August 2018. For some reason, it wouldn't let me externally link to the page views page. It would cut off part of the link and the rest of my message. No idea why. If you can figure out a way to link that, help will be appreciated. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Any "|" characters in the URL need to be replaced with "|" or the URLs won't render correctly. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't want to overdo it, so for now, the Lab Rats discussion will be the only one; however, I got bored and decided to look at what other of our Nickelodeon/Disney Channel series could be under the base titles instead of (unnecessarily) disambiguated.
I was bored.
Backstage: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2017-08-16&end=2018-08-15&pages=Backstage_(2016_TV_series)%7CBackstage_(1988_film)%7CBackstage_(2000_film)%7CBackstage_(2000_TV_series)%7CBackstage_(2005_film)
The 2016 TV series is the primary topic here.
Hunter Street: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2017-08-16&end=2018-08-15&pages=Hunter_Street_(TV_series)%7CHunter_Street_(Hamilton,_Ontario)%7CHunter_Street_(Newcastle)%7CHunter_Street,_Sydney
The TV series is the primary topic here.
I Didn't Do It: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2017-08-16&end=2018-08-15&pages=I_Didn%27t_Do_It_(TV_series)%7CI_Didn%27t_Do_It_(film)
The TV series is the primary topic here.
Ride is actually superseded by others, like the band, so no arguments that disambiguation is definitely needed for the TV series. Same with School of Rock, where the film (50%~), under the base title School of Rock, supersedes the TV series (24%~). In fact, the School of Rock film being named just School of Rock is probably an example that could be used to support why the US Lab Rats TV series is fine under just Lab Rats.
Stuck in the Middle: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2017-08-16&end=2018-08-15&pages=Stuck_in_the_Middle_(TV_series)%7CStuck_in_the_Middle_(Clea_song)
The TV series is the primary topic here.
The Lodge: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2017-08-16&end=2018-08-15&pages=The_Lodge_(TV_series)%7CThe_Lodge_(Australia)
The TV series is the primary topic here.
Like I said, I'm not pursuing these now, especially considering you might feel different on some of these, and you're the expert. I was just bored. If you want to, go crazy, lol, since you've already been doing a lot of disambiguation move work. I'll just be sticking to the Lab Rats one for now. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

@Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968: Do you guys have opinions on this? Will you be commenting? Except for a couple of comments, the other opposing comments are either joke/anti-US bias comments (see first comment) or "per above" comments with no elaboration which doesn't really help matters, and I would say the same thing if they were "per above" support comments. Obviously, you guys can vote either way, should you comment, but of all those who have voted oppose so far, the first one of which I'm not personally counting due to it being a joke, it seems to be those subset of editors who want hardline disambiguation if there is even the slightest possibility of confusion. IJBall runs into them quite often as he a lot of disambiguation work. And based on those opposing comments thus far, it seems to me like they're the kind who would want unnecessary disambiguation like Game Shakers (U.S. TV series), or even "better," Game Shakers (2015 U.S. Nickelodeon TV series). lol Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@Amaury: I didn't comment as I am inclined to oppose a move because the normal meaning to me of Lab Rats is Laboratory rats which I would expect to get to on a search for various minor variation on the name. I generally don't like minor name variations being used for different topics. It's current location makes it clear it is a TV series. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
@Geraldo Perez: Fair enough, and I of course respect your point of view. If only everyone, supporter or opposer, could explain their votes/views like that. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Welcome back

Oh, hey. Welcome back. I thought you died. Either that or you had an Internet outage. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Nope – just stepped away from the computer for the weekend... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
We all need a break sometimes. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Do you remember what feature this is and how to disable it?

A lot of times lately when I'm writing, I'll leave my cursor somewhere, something like that will pop up, and it ends up placing the typing point back to the beginning without me realizing and I start typing there. For example, I could be typing the word "apple" at the end of a paragraph when it does that, so instead of "separate ways apple," I get something like "appleWhen Rudy..." Sometimes I'll place my cursor somewhere to fix a typo, and it'll also do that. It's the yellow popup. It's so annoying. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't think I have that feature... Are you using WP:Popups? I've never enabled that... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:55, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Found it, I think: "GoogleTrans: open a translation popup for the selected text or the word under the cursor when pushing the shift button." Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:01, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Fireman Sam

Hi, I am just letting you know that the IP editor who was persistently vandalising the Fireman Sam page is continuing to do so even after the temporary protection on it. If you have any thoughts on this (such as re-protection) can you please add it to the discussion on the talk page. I am asking you as you have previously been involved in helping tackle this issue. Voello (talk) 10:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Bot request

Have you ever submitted a bot request in Wikipedia:Bot requests? I'd like to have a bot tag the articles in the maintenance category with the television WikiProject template, as a lot of them are missing it. --Gonnym (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

@Gonnym: I've made at least one bot request in the past (it was a request to tag the talk pages of redirects with 'class=Redirect', where applicable), but I'm not sure if my request ever went anywhere. Your request seems simple – in fact, there may have been a bot that used to do exactly what you want, but it might have stopped operating... Anyway, no harm in making a request. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Nice, it's in process already. --Gonnym (talk) 18:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Cousins for Life

I'm predicting this will probably premiere in October, like Disney Channel's Coop & Cami, as it does have a Halloween episode. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

No ads run on DC for it yet (that's I've seen), though, so it'll have to premiere later than Coop & Cami... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Nickelodeon* Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
OK – amend to: I haven't seen ads for it on TeenNick, which I would expect to if it were to premiere around the same time... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Pakistani television serial

Does "serial" in Pakistani television mean something different than it does in the UK? I thought that serial was just their word for miniseries, but a 18 episode series is not a miniseries. --Gonnym (talk) 07:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@Gonnym: Apparently, yes – the word "serial" to the Pakistanis must be akin to what the Americans call a "limited series" (i.e. a single-season TV series of any number of episodes). Regardless, we don't second guess sourcing, and at least two of those articles had sourcing referring to those series as a "serial", so therefore it's legitimate to disambiguate those ones with "serial". OTOH, if no sourcing had used the word "serial", then a move to "TV series" would likely have been justified... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

WP:TONE

Do you know if there's a list with words to avoid? I'm trying to figure out if "guy" is similar to "kid(s)"—in which we should use "child(ren)" instead—and should be avoided and I should just use "boy" or "man" instead. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't think there is a list, but I would avoid use of the word "guy" unless it's in a quote, and try and use a word like "man" or "person", etc. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
On another note, just like we italicize series and films here, such as Henry Danger, does that extend to fictional TV series and films, too? Like in Kickin' It's "How Bobby Got His Groove Back" (S3 E20), Bobby Wasabi's movie Super Samurai turns out to be horrible. Should the movie name be italicized as Super Samurai all the same? Likewise with fictional episode titles. Would we place them in quotes just like we do here? For example, like above. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
I honestly have no idea on that one... (I believe fictional episode titles would still go in quotes, but I have no idea about fictional movies and TV shows) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:18, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Meant to reply earlier. Oops. @Geraldo Perez: Any ideas on this? Are fictional series or films within a series or film treated the same and italicized? Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
@Amaury: Doesn't really matter if fictional or not, should treat fictional titles the same as real titles. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Just a quick reminder to format intentional disambiguation links (like this one) in accordance with WP:INTDABLINK. Cheers! bd2412 T 12:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Ah, explains the DLP bot message this morning... OK, will try to remember that. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Liv and Maddie – User:Friendshipfan

I'm having my suspicions about this user. From experience, we know that Bambifan101 goes head over heels on trying to add various not defining categories to Liv and Maddie, such as Category:Television series about friendship. And look at the username here: Friendshipfan. Now, like with anything else, this could be a complete coincidence, but it just feels like it's too coincidental. Doing some investigating, Friendshipfan joined on August 1 and started editing on August 17, which is the same date that the Bambifan101 IP showed up on Liv and Maddie. One of the articles that Friendshipfan has edited is Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure, and if we take a look at the history at the end of December last year, we can see that the article was also edited by Bambifan101's other socks Kkjj and Jkjk. And if we take a look at the other articles Friendshipfan has edited, all but one—Mickey Mouse universe—have also been edited by Bambifan101's socks. This can't be all be coincidental. For reference, the SPI page: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bambifan101/Archive.

I'll also ping Favonian as they are the ones who last dealt with Bambifan101 when they semi-protected Liv and Maddie and range blocked the offending IP. I hope you don't mind the ping, Favonian, but what do you think? Is this a clear WP:DUCK? Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Don't mind at all, but my involvement with Bambifan is rather tangential, and I'm not confident enough to duck-block this one. Ordinarily, I'd recommend a CheckUser investigation, but it looks like the confirmed sightings are all stale. Sorry! Favonian (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Keep monitoring – if it is Bambifan101, it won't be long before they succumb to WP:DUCK-type edits, and then it can be taken to WP:SPI. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
My suspicions were correct. They have been blocked by Bbb23. (Courtesy ping for Favonian.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:00, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

If only cable were like broadcast

At least cable networks like Nickelodeon and Disney Channel.

For example, American Housewife "Spring Gala": Who it's written and directed by, who is (special) guest starring, video format, and audio format. Then you have Young Sheldon "A Rival Prodigy and Sir Isaac Neutron", which lists guest stars more in-depth, as it lists everyone. Admittedly, this also means co-stars, and the ordering and names of the guest stars may differ in the end credits—for example, Jason Kravits as Dr. Hodges in the press release vs. Jason Kravits as Dr. Ronald Hodges in the credits—but, I mean, when do you see Nickelodeon and Disney Channel doing that? Only on very rare occasions, and I've only ever seen that with Disney Channel, like the guest star for the upcoming Raven's Home three-parter. But most of the time it's just brief synopses and that's it. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:40, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Insatiable (TV series)

Hi IJBall, Geraldo Perez, and Amaury,
It seems that a fairly new editor keep on making WP:TOOSOON articles for actors/actresses. As I recalled, one significant role, several minor roles, and no significant coverage do not meet the guidelines for an actor/actress. Thoughts? — Lbtocthtalk 00:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

@Lbtocth: If you haven't already, leave a message on their Talk page, explaining that meeting WP:NACTOR and WP:BASIC is a necessary requirement for WP:BLP articles – let them know that "insufficient" articles can be moved to WP:Draftspace or WP:Userspace while they're worked on. Beyond that, there are a few options: Really short articles should just be boldly moved to WP:Draftspace. Somewhat questionable articles can be {{Notability}} tagged. Articles somewhere in the middle can be WP:PRODed or taken to WP:AfD. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, IJBall. — Lbtocthtalk 02:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

VPR

I've made a proposal over here, in case you're interested, as I figure you'd find it useful as well: Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#A better way to handle headings with the same name. Like I said over there, my test page example is a bit extreme, so I also provided a more realistic example. Sometimes, headers with the same name just can't be avoided. I think what Guy Macon mentioned would probably be the best way to handle this. IDs, basically, similar to what you see for a forum's forums (sections), threads, posts, etc. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

From what I saw, they gave some suggestions for handling this (primarily the use of hidden characters in the header)... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Note

Please be careful not to introduce subtle inaccuracies. Your WP:TVSEASONYEAR edit on RoboRoach did not match the dates for one of the seasons. I've already corrected it, but you make lots of copyedits so I'm leaving this message for future reference. Modernponderer (talk) 22:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

There's no need to leave a Talk page message about this – if I've made an incidental typo in an edit, just correct it. (Also, if you are going to leave a message like this, please leave the specific WP:DIFF in question...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:06, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) He made a simple mistake. No need to give him the third degree. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:07, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) It was still a simple mistake, and giving him the third degree over it is overkill. We're only human, and it's not like he went in there and said: "I'm going to deliberately forget 2004, because I want to cause trouble." A small error being left in place for a prolonged period of time is not going to kill anybody. What if IJBall were the kind of editor who lost his confidence and stopped editing and left Wikipedia because of a message like this? Fix the mistake, as you have, and move on. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Co-stars

While we don't list them, they count toward recurring status, right? Like we did with Clark in School of Rock. Evan Hofer as Randy appeared a total of six times throughout Kickin' It, which meets the bar for recurring, though three of those appearances were as a co-star. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

If they were "co-star", and then later "guest star", then yes (IMO). However, if they have, say, 6 appearances as a "co-star" (only), then I would tend not to list them under 'Recurring' (or, at the least, I'd initiate a Talk page discussion on the subject...). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
What about ordering/placement in cast sections/character lists? We order those not only by credit order, but order of appearance as well. Should that be based on overall first appearance or first appearance as a guest star? As an example, we have a 20-episode first season, right? Apple has appeared 9 times in the first season and Orange has appeared 11 times in the first season. They both obviously qualify as recurring. Apple has appeared in 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, while Orange has appeared in 1, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20. However, for episodes 1, 3, and 4, Orange was a co-star. Should Apple be listed first or should Orange be listed first? Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
In that scenario, Apple should be listed first. As per the "note" in WP:TVCAST: "Note that "new cast members" does not necessarily mean cast members new to a series, although it can. It refers to any cast member new to the respective cast list. For example, when a previously recurring actor is promoted to a starring role, such as what happened to Sara Gilbert in The Big Bang Theory, or Richard Harmon in The 100, they are moved to the end of the "starring" lists regardless of the number of episodes in which they previously appeared as a recurring character." So, here, the first time Orange appears as a "guest star", as opposed to being just a "co-star", is what should be counted towards adding them to the 'Recurring' section. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Another comedy series order from Disney Channel – Sydney to the Max

A few days late on noticing this, but here is the sandbox page: User:Amaury/sandbox/Sydney to the Max. Pinging Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968 as well.

Disney Channel is sure on a roll. Fast Layne, Coop & Cami Ask the World, Gabby Duran & The Unsittables, and now Sydney to the Max. Adding in the currently airing series, which are Bizaardvark, Andi Mack, and Raven's Home, that would be seven live-action series airing. Maybe Disney Channel is trying to get back to the Jessie and Austin & Ally days, where they had 6–8 series airing and had premieres on both Fridays and Sundays. 😁 Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

User:Airaarandia

I've been noticing this user making some edits that go against WP:ACCESS with their use of rowspan in various tables across a number of articles (and I'm thinking they edited as IP 112.206.71.246 prior to using the registered account). They also have been disruptive at Pretty Little Liars, reordering the cast list ([2][3]). I've only reverted at PLL, and the IP edits at a couple of the actresses' articles, and might do more in the morning, but you can handle those sooner if I don't get to them. MPFitz1968 (talk) 09:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done. In addition to WP:ACCESS violations, and unnecessary use of 'rowspan', they're also guilty of WP:OVERLINKing. Most concerning of all is their ping-ponging on WP:FILMOGRAPHY best-practices edits (e.g. the 'Notes' part), which makes me think they may not be on the up-and-up – IOW, why properly remove the "number of episodes" from the table just to restore them in a later edit. That doesn't seem kosher... If they are the same as the IP, they geolocate to the Philippines. Probably bears watching... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Milo Manheim – Dancing with the Stars

Tweeted here. There's a link there that leads you here. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm not denying it. I just feel strongly that any future roles need to be sourced, and trying to add these without sourcing merits immediate reversion – it's up to editors to source content when they add it. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Oh, don't worry. I know, and I wasn't saying you were. Just saying that there is a source for it. lol Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Sequel/spinoff parameters

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Sequel/spinoff parameters. I decided it was time to bring this up. Are you proud of me? 😎 Inviting Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968 there as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:21, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Nielsen definitely needs a better method of tracking ratings

Just made this tweet if you and MPFitz1968 are interested. One of the main points is even with cord cutting running amok, the declines we've seen for broadcast/cable television should not have been as sharp as they have been, not even for Live+SD, if each unique viewer were counted. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:49, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Lab Rats LOC cleanup

I've begun cleanup here: User:Amaury/sandbox/List of Lab Rats characters

I'll fill in the content later, I just got the general outline done for now. Like Henry Danger's LOC, additional sections are unnecessary and "Recurring" and "Notable" are sufficient for the non-mains. I just wanted to run the recurring and notable by you and see if you agree or:

  • You think a recurring belongs in notable or vice-versa
  • You think a notable should be removed
  • You think a character should be added to recurring
  • You think a character should be added to notable

To make it easy for you, I've included the following, with their number of appearances in parentheses. A lot of these are obviously recurring, but I'm including them for the sake of completeness.

Recurring
  • Angel Parker as Tasha (34)
  • Will Forte as the voice of Eddy (18)
  • Maile Flanagan as Principal Perry / Perry (42)
  • Eddie Perino as Trent (6)
  • Madison Pettis as Janelle (11)
  • Michaela Carrozzo as Caitlin (7)
  • Mateus Ward as Marcus (8)
  • Jeremy Kent Jackson as Douglas Davenport / Douglas (25)
  • Graham Shiels as Krane (5)
  • Dustin Ingram as Scott (4)
  • Ashley Argota as S-1 / Taylor (4)
  • John Eric Bentley as President (5)
  • Cole Ewing as S-3 / Sebastian (6)
  • Max Charles as Spin (6)
  • Brandon Salgado-Telis as Bob (13)

While Scott and S-1 / Taylor only appeared in four episodes each, I feel recurring is okay for them because they had significant/important plot lines, in my opinion. As we know, recurring isn't only about episode count. But, of course, we shouldn't overdo that and think we can just list anyone who's had important plot lines if they only appeared in 1–3 episodes. My opinion is that, like you, five or higher is definitely recurring. Four is a bare minimum, but additional conditions have to be taken into account. Not everyone who has four appearances should be listed, just those "special" ones, like Morgan Ross from Jessie, who also had four appearances, but is listed.

As for notable, I've include the following. Ones marked in bold are special guest stars who instantly deserve to be listed as notable.

Notable guest stars

Here are the ones I did NOT include. Is there anyone in the list below who belongs in notable?

Not included

Thanks in advance! Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:57, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

On the 'Recurring' list, the only name I don't recognize is Dustin Ingram as Scott (was this the guy that was Bree's artist boyfriend?...). He, and Ashley Argota as S-1/Taylor, are the only "borderline cases" of just "4 episodes", but Argota actually appeared in two "double-length" episodes (so her "episode count" is really 6 episodes!) so she should stay. So I'm just not sure about Ingram...
On the 'Notable guest' list, I agree with everyone listed. However, I would "bump" up to this list the following: Cody Christian as Kavan(?), Tim Russ as Agent Gordon, Noah Wyle as Dr. Evans (definitely!!), and possibly Ping Wu as Dr. Gao... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Scott is the boss of Tech Town, where Caitlin has already been working and Bree later gets a job. Then Chase gets a job there and outshines Bree. First appeared in "Zip It." Kavan is the guy who Bree accidentally threw a basketball at in the very first episode, causing his nose to swell up. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Scott is pretty borderline then – I think I'd be more inclined to demote that one to "Notable guests" in that case. I'd have to rewatch the pilot again, to see how "important" a guest character Kavan is then – it's possible that one should be left out... But Russ and Wyle are definitely notable guest stars, and Dr. Gao was an important character in the double-length episode he appeared in (and Ping Wu is a pretty notable character actor...), so those three should be included. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Did you ever get the Disney Now thing sorted? If you visit the website on your computer directly, are all the episodes there? https://disneynow.go.com/shows/lab-rats Here's the direct link for the first episode: https://disneynow.go.com/shows/lab-rats/season-01/episode-01-crush-chop-burn/vdka4316756 Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I use the Disney Now app, and that's the one's that's been hobbled with limited episode content (it may because I'm accessing through Spectrum Cable...). Lab Rats was on Netflix at one point... but I'm not sure if they still have it. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Question. Would you capitalize the apps? For example, the current version has them as Commando App, Triton App, etc. Do you consider them proper nouns? Or should they be either something like "Triton app" or "triton app"? Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

No (to captializing "app"), but I'd check to see how it's handled in the Closed Captioning first... (My guess is that it's "Triton app", etc...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I've seen both "Triton" and "triton," but probably the former is correct. I don't remember the other ones too well, even though I just binged it, but ones like magnetism app I think would just be lowercase, unless starting a sentence. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Looking at the wikia, the apps appear to be considered abilities. Commando and Triton appear to be proper names, while other apps like override and magnetism appear to just be general apps. I know in Digimon and Pokémon, the name of the attacks are considered proper nouns—eg, Pepper Breath, Thunder Shock, etc.—but there they actually call out those attacks. In Lab Rats it's different as they just use them. Closed captions aren't a help for the commando one as the first three seasons have them all in caps. Season four doesn't, but the only episode with mention of the commando one—"Spike vs. Spikette—doesn't have working captions. The episodes themselves aren't a help, either, as it's all in caps there, too: https://i.imgur.com/i1sIHvH.png Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

I keep forgetting to update on this. I finished cleaning up the character bios for the characters that are already there on the live article on August 18. Now it's just a matter of trying to come up with and write bios for some of those under Notable guest stars. If you wanna take a stab at it from what you remember, feel free! Also, I paragraphed things differently compared to what the live article currently has. Generally, what I did is have the character "introduction" as one paragraph and then all of the "In X episode..." as one paragraph. I don't think it necessary to have all the "In X episode..." as separate paragraphs as is currently the case with the live article. Now, if only one "In X episode..." is mentioned and the "introduction" is relatively short, like Trent, or if the "introduction" is just super short, like with Caitlin, I just made it all one paragraph. If you still think some tweaks could be done to the paragraphing, by all means, feel free! Also, just because the recurring and notable guest stars appear in X amount of episodes doesn't necessarily mean all of their appearances have to be mentioned. Mentioning only some or even none of a character's appearances is fine as long as the bio still reads good. Like Caitlin appeared in seven episodes, but only three of those appearances are mentioned. Daniel appeared in three episodes, but none of those episodes are mentioned, and it works out for him. User:Amaury/sandbox/List of Lab Rats characters. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:04, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Kickin' It LOC cleanup

Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn

I finally got around to adding recurring (long-time needed) and notable sections to Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn. Unless I missed anybody, recurring should be good to go, but I wanted to see if you agree with the notable section. Is there anybody listed there now who isn't considered notable and should be removed? Likewise, is there anybody who I didn't add who is notable and should be added? List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn episodes. Here is a list of those I did not add to either section:

Guest Stars Not Included
  • Shaun Brown as Kenny (1)
  • Aubrey Miller as Tess (1)
  • Mircea Monroe as Tiffany (1)
  • Andrew Bowen as Rod (1)
  • David Hoffman as Grizz Coyote (1)
  • Storm Reid as Scarlett (1)
  • Ian Reed Kesler as Mr. Williams (3)
  • Jada Facer as Ang (1)
  • Sheryl Lee Ralph as Ms. Eleanor Dumont (1)
  • Danielle Morrow as Veronica Miller (1)
  • McKaley Miller as Emily (1)
  • Maitlyn Pezzo as Indra (2)
  • Lauri Johnson as Tanya (1)
  • Chiara Aurelia as Denise (1)
  • Mark Adair-Rios as Dr. Miller (1)
  • Mary Passeri as Andrea (1)
  • Marcelo Tubert as The Wondrous Androoni (1)
  • Kurt Long as Phil Milbank (1)
  • Janelle Marra as Bonnie Milbank (1)
  • John Farley as Mr. Dexter (1)
  • Jessica Belkin as Madison (3)
  • Elisha Henig as Lucas (2)
  • Lori Alan as Ms. Bing (1)
  • Ramy Youssef as Ty (1)
  • Hannah Nordberg as Sienna (1)
  • Jillian Shea Spaeder as McKenna (1)
  • Sydney Park as Randee (1)
  • Niko Guardado as Jaymis (1)
  • Brian Baumgartner as JD McCoy (1)
  • Shad Gaspard as Lou (1)
  • Shane Blades as Doyle Thomas (1)
  • Zoe Chao as Ms. Apollo (1)
  • Damarr Calhoun as Archie (1)
  • Aiden Lewandowski as Stevie (1)
  • BJ Tanner as Spaulding (1)
  • Jimmy Deshler as Declan (1)
  • Amber Friendly as Nilla (1)
  • Isaak Presley as Moses (2)
  • Valeria Maldonado as Sharon Dee (1)
  • Spencer Tomich as Trey (4)
  • Molly Jackson as Brianna (3)
  • Will Babbitt as Marshall (1)
  • Ashley Liao as Syd (1)
  • Mary Birdsong as Ms. Gressle (1)
  • Tom Choi as Sophisticated Guy (1)
  • Lydia Bolland as Molly (1)
  • Butch Klein as Honest Abe (1)
  • Tiffany Jeneen as Fran (1)
  • Dale Raqul as Grandma Harper (1)
  • Michael Bunin as Carmichael (1)
  • Eve Moon as Nelly Miller (1)
  • Grant Durazzo as Johnny (1)
  • Laya Deleon Hayes as Tina (1)
  • Audrey Whitby as Tori (1)
  • Noah Urrea as Dylan (1)
  • Michael Nanfria as Coach Fessler (1)
  • Gage Petrone as Franco (3)
  • Jennifer Aspen as Aunt Jackie (1)
  • Londale Theus Jr. as Lonny Tusk (1)
  • Kari Wahlgren as YOCO (V.O.)
  • Miles Elliot as Kipper (2)
  • Sidney Floyd as Brooklyn (4)
  • Rena Strober as Ms. Tassinari (1)
  • Rose Abdoo as Principal Sarah Noonan (1)
  • Jamie Moyer as Mrs. Monet (1)
  • Sean O'Donnell as Elijah (1)
  • Mishka Calderon as Amber (1)
  • Pilot Paisley-Rose as Danielle (1)
  • Brianna Reed as Marcia (1)

As always, thanks in advance for your expert knowledge in being able to tell which regular non-recurring guest stars are notable (as special guest stars are automatically notable, obviously). Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Outside of Audrey Whitby (because of the NICK connection), I wouldn't be inclined to list any of these... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
So we should only list other Nick stars as notable on this one? Is there a difference between this and Lab Rats? For Lab Rats, you said all the regular guest stars listed as notable were fine as they were, even though most of them aren't tied to Disney Channel or Disney XD. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:54, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Well, is this about people who were credited as "Special guest stars"? Or is it simply "notable guest stars"? With Lab Rats, wasn't it mostly about the former?... In any case, based on who you've already listed at NRD&D, I'd just be tempted to include Whitby as well. (Also, wasn't her guest stint pretty significant – i.e. didn't Whitby kind of dominate the episode?...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:58, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
When I originally started doing the "Notable guest stars" section—though of course I was not the first one, as it has been used at articles I don't watch for ages—I think I originally had just special guest stars, but when I discussed it with you, you agreed that special guest stars are automatically notable, but you also mentioned that there are some regular (non-special) guest stars that could still be qualified as notable, so the section is now both for special guest stars and regular guest stars who aren't recurring, but are notable. For example, Noah Wyle as Dr. Evans (regular guest star), who you said was definitely notable in Lab Rats. Or Garrett Morris as Old Fizzwick in Knight Squad. He isn't credited as a special guest star, just a guest star. You even reverted me when I thought he wasn't notable. I'm not as good as you are on how to tell if someone is notable or not, which is why I'm always double-checking. So I can do it, I just don't trust 100% if I'm right. But what I've picked up with regular guest stars is that if someone appears as themselves, they are notable, like Gabby Douglas, who appears as herself in Kickin' It and as Twisty in NRDD. Also, if other stars from the same network appear, they are notable. For example, Ricardo Hurtado from School of Rock appearing on NRDD for Nickelodeon or G. Hannelius from Dog with a Blog appearing on Jessie for Disney Channel, the latter of which you agreed with when working on the Jessie LOC sandbox earlier. Maybe I'm not doing it right. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
"Notable guest starts" would be "big guest stars" first (e.g. that's Noah Wyle or Garret Morris), and then next other guest stars "who might be notable for other reasons" – in the latter category would be examples like, "cast member of a fellow Nick/Disney show who guest stars". Basically, there's no hard and fast rule on this, so it's better to make the "notable guest star" hurdle pretty high or the list of "guest stars" quickly gets out of control... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Okay. I think I got it. Hopefully. So special guest stars are automatically notable and should be listed—no debate there. (In the case of NRDD, it surprisingly had no special guest stars.) And then from there, that's when we start looking more closely at who we add as notable from those who are just regular guest stars and go on a case-by-case basis. For example, Noah Wyle was only credited as a guest star, but he is a big guest star, as you said, and is thus notable. Fellow stars from the same network would then come next. Now, for people who appear as themselves—like Ciara—it can actually probably go either way on whether to include them or not. So then the question becomes: How do you tell who is notable and who is not? What's the unofficial process on telling? I assume that just because they have an article here doesn't necessarily make them notable. Likewise, just because they don't have an article here doesn't necessarily not make them notable. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:42, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Having a Wikipedia article is actually a pretty good clue – if you're including people that don't have their own Wikipedia article, there needs to be a really good reason for it (like starring on a fellow network show...), IMO. Beyond that, there's no "rule" – it would just come down to consensus of "notable" guest stars... Which, BTW, is why I don't like "Guest cast" sections most of the time. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
You mean listing only main and recurring should be it? At least on the parent article. Then if a LOC is appropriate, that's where we would list the notables. Although for most series, cast/characters doesn't reach split territory. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:07, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Basically, yeah – I find including a 'Guest cast' section less objectionable for a LoC article. Also, for TV shows that only run a few episodes (e.g. just one season), I also don't mind a 'Guest cast' section nearly as much. But, for long-running series, I think having a 'Guest cast' section at the parent TV series article to be generally questionable/problematic. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Removed for now on Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn. Maybe if bios are ever expanded for the main characters and large bios are added for the recurring, a character list will be appropriate, but I doubt we'll ever reach that point for Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn. The Thundermans and Henry Danger, however, have character lists and are the perfect candidates to include this extra notable information at, just like Kickin' It, which I still have to finish, and Lab Rats, which just needs bios added for some in my sandbox. Amaury (talk | contribs) 12:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Double Dare

If you want to provide a more detailed reply, as I'm not at my computer right now: [4]. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:12, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Commenting there will just convince that person that you and I are socks of each other. If he's serious, let him file the SPI. If that happens let me know. He can't possibly have evidence of this, though... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Extra

Just noticed that extr@ should probably be also changed, but I don't know to what. Is it a British show that just dubbed the other languages or is this a franchise? --Gonnym (talk) 21:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I admit that I have little idea to do with these kinds of cases where a "special character" is used. It basically falls under WP:TITLESPECIALCHARACTERS and WP:TITLETM, I guess, but I'm a lot less familiar with those ones... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
That isn't my problem, that's easy. It's Extra - capital E, and "a" instead of "@" (following MOS:TMRULES - see the Se7en and Alien3 examples). My question what country does this belong to, do you know? --Gonnym (talk) 22:49, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Oh, on that I can't tell, though the original networks were Channel 4 and PBS, which implies (strongly) that it's some kind of UK-U.S. production, though the article does claim a UK (only?) origin. The other issue? – Is it even notable?!... I'm guessing that it's not, and should be deleted. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Backstage

@Amaury: Just a heads up that I have started to make my through season #2 of Backstage (via Netflix). I don't know if you or MPFitz1968 have had a chance to do this yet... Anyway, the first thing I notice is that while Thomas L. Colford is main cast credited in episode #2.1, Hailey Fauchere is only guest-credited for that episode. I dunno if she's promoted to main cast later in the season or not – I'll be keeping my eye on this... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Sidenote: I can't find season #2 of The Lodge anywhere – do either of you know if it's been released in North American at all?!... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) I keep wanting to watch Backstage, but the farthest I've gotten in season 2 is episode 2. Hopefully, I can get into it a bit more in the coming weeks. Other TV shows I'm watching, as well as other activities, are slowing me down. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Followup

@Amaury: There's an issue with List of Backstage episodes that I noticed – this is one of those shows that only credits guest actors, not the characters they play, yet some of the guest listings for the episodes include character names parenthetically. There are a couple of possible approaches to handling this, but the parenthetical character naming has got to go... Let me know what you think. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

I believe Nyuszika7H did that to make it clear it wasn't credited names and it was the WP:COMMONNAMES being used, though only on the first occurrence—any other appearance is just the actor name—just like what he did at The Thundermans and 100 Things to Do Before School.
My opinion is that we should just do it no differently than when the character names are provided in the end credits, to a point. Like in this version of Knight Squad—for example, Seth Carr as Fizzwick. The only differences would be that we would of course use only the WP:COMMONNAME—for example, Hogancross, not Wizard Hogancross—and we would just make it super clear that we are using the common names: as hidden notes, in a visible notes section, on the talk page, two of these, all three of these, or a combination of the three. As long as we make it clear the WP:COMMONNAMES are being used, I see no issue with using the normal "actor as character" route, like at Liv and Maddie, etc. I'll ping Geraldo Perez as well if he has any thoughts. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
My preference is to handle this within the episode summary the first time the character appears – e.g. After the dance auditions, Helsweel selects Vanessa to train with the Primas, an elite group of fourth-year dance students led by Cassandra (Madison MacGregor). or Principal Durani (Dewshane Williams) puts Miles in charge of an activity to bring the disciplines together at Keaton..., and then just leave it as Guest star: Madison MacGregor or Guest star: Dewshane Williams at the bottom of the episode summary... An alternate way to handle it for recurring characters would be like: After the dance auditions, Helsweel selects Vanessa to train with the Primas, an elite group of fourth-year dance students led by Cassandra. But I really don't like the Guest star: Madison MacGregor (Cassandra) way of doing this when they aren't credited that way... (We're stuck with this, for now, at Knight Squad, as no one has written up episode summaries yet.) --IJBall (contribs • talk)

Last names

I'm working on a sandbox only version of the upcoming The Conners for obvious reasons. Anyway, in the announcements, like here and here, they don't explicitly have "Conner" next to the character names. For example, here: The Conners will feature the rest of the Roseanne revival cast, John Goodman (“Dan”), Laurie Metcalf (“Jackie”), Sara Gilbert (“Darlene”), Lecy Goranson (“Becky”) and Michael Fishman (“D.J.”), who will reprise their Conner characters. (Deadline Hollywood) Or here: John Goodman ('Dan'), Laurie Metcalf ('Jackie'), Sara Gilbert ('Darlene'), Lecy Goranson ('Becky') and Michael Fishman ('D.J.') Are Set to Star as Their Iconic Conner Characters (The Futon Critic). Instead the last name Conner is just a general mention, but is that good enough to include still? For example, "John Goodman as Dan Conner." Thanks. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

IMO, yes – because in the previous iterations that this show is based on, their names were always "Conner". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
On a semi-related note, you can really tell I'm expanding my interests horizon. See contribs. For far too long, it was just Nickelodeon and Disney Channel—and TeenNick for Degrassi and Disney XD for Kickin' It, Lab Rats, Mighty Med, Kirby Buckets, Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything, and Lab Rats: Elite Force, but those weren't a lot compared to what I was watching on the parent networks—then I expanded to The Middle on ABC, which I binged and got caught up to the current season, I think about two years ago. The current season then, I think, was the seventh. From there, it just started branching out to American Housewife to Young Sheldon and so on. So now I've seen series on ABC, CBS, and NBC, albeit that last one, for now, has only been Champions. Fox doesn't seem to have anything interesting, but I am interested in The CW's Riverdale. It looks interesting. Hopefully I can binge it and get caught up once I'm done catching up on all the seasons to date of Modern Family and The Goldbergs that are on my DVR. 😁 Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm pretty down on the upcoming Fall TV season – I think the only new show I've even scheduled for myself is The CW's Legacies... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:33, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Coop & Cami cast

Other than Albert Tsai, who already has an article, should the cast members ever meet WP:NACTOR and whatever else—unlikely, but not impossible—you should find it useful that Disney ABC Press' show bios has basic information like their birth dates, something that's not available very often except on sites like Famous Birthdays which are of course WP:NOTRS. The only exception is Rebecca Metz, whose birthday is not mentioned. (And Albert Tsai's birthday is just listed with the month and day.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Olivia Sanabia co-headlined Just Add Magic (TV series) – she's probably not a WP:BASIC meet yet, but she may be getting close to meriting an article. The only other one who is conceivable is Rebecca Metz, who plays the mom(?), but it doesn't look like she's done enough yet to qualify for any article either. But, yeah – I've known that the Disney bios have good bio info for a while now. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:38, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
On that note, I have a sneaking suspicion that the Pretty Famous site being used to cite Albert Tsai's exact birthday is no more reliable than Famous Birthdays... and is therefore WP:NOTRS. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Yep – should be taken out. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018

Hello IJBall, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
Other
Moving to Draft and Page Mover
  • Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
  • If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
  • Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
  • The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
  • The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

  • Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
  • In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
  • MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
  • User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
  • User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
  • User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
  • User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
  • User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

A way to list all sandbox pages?

You don't happen to know if there's a page, similar to a category page, that lists all your sandbox pages, do you? (Preferably, in alphabetical order.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Special:Prefixindex/User:Amaury/ (Special:Allpages/User:Amaury/ works too but continues on past the end of your sandbox lsiting). --Izno (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

The Chronicles of Narnia BBC

What is your take on The Chronicles of Narnia (TV series) and The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (1988 TV serial), Prince Caspian/The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1989 TV serial) and The Silver Chair (1990 TV serial)? From videos on YouTube they all open with the title of "The Chronicles of Narnia" (obviously); released each year from 1988; they are sold in boxsets [5], [6]; and this book seems to talk about it as a group and not separate serials. --Gonnym (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

@Gonnym: First sorry – I've been distracted by non-Wiki stuff this weekend, and so I only just got this!... My take is that this situation looks identical to the situation involving Roxy Hunter: in the Roxy Hunter case, I have put {{merge to}} tags on each of the constituent articles – Roxy Hunter and the Mystery of the Moody Ghost, Roxy Hunter and the Secret of the Shaman, Roxy Hunter and the Myth of the Mermaid, and Roxy Hunter and the Horrific Halloween – and intend to merge the separate articles into just one single, unified article at Roxy Hunter.
I suggest the very same thing be done here – {{merge to}} tag TLTW&TW, PC/TVOTDT and TSC pages, with a plan to merge them all back to The Chronicles of Narnia (TV series). But there is no reason for any of these to exist as separate articles – The Chronicles of Narnia (TV series) already covers the same material (and already in too much detail!), so the separate articles should be made into redirects. (Note that I'm not even touching the "article naming" issues here – but they're clearly secondary to the fact that the constituent articles should be merged back to The Chronicles of Narnia (TV series)...) Anyway, that's what I think should be done in this case. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the response, yeah that sounds like a good idea. --Gonnym (talk) 21:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Could use your opinion

Mind taking a look at World of Dance (season 2)? An editor started adding bold to emphasis some data in tables which I understand from MOS:NOBOLD should not be done. I've reverted him twice but don't want to snowball this, so would like other eyes on this. Could you take a look and let me know what you think? --Gonnym (talk) 22:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Viacom

Don't know if it somehow explains part of the ratings decline, but you might be interested in this shocker (not really). *cough* Nick at Nite, especially *cough* Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Fools. The recent trend on ads is in the opposite direction... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:23, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

The Gifted

You should have just let it be (I know from personal experience it's easier said than done) as the vote was already going to pass. The admins there almost always just do a number-count regardless of policy arguments. --Gonnym (talk) 18:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Maybe. But I'd rather have a well-discussed consensus than "win" a WP:RM... But I do think the "oppose" there votes are unlikely to carry it – the whole "primary subtopic" argument never prevails at RM (and I should know – I've actually argued in favor of one, once or twice!), and opposing on the basis that the other article might not be notable... well, it's kind of a WP:OSE argument. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, the oppose arguments were pointless. I know of one article which won a primary subtopic. The Office (U.S. TV series) :mad:. --Gonnym (talk) 18:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Yep. And that was a complex one, on which I changed my mind several times... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bsems reported by User:Amaury (Result: ). Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

LSBS

[7] Hopefully the marathon includes the Halloween Special, as it's the only one I'm missing information on, and it's not on-demand or on the Nick website. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Beyond

Finally got around to making a proper recurring list—ordered properly by order of appearances and credit order—for the entirety of the series on User:Amaury/sandbox/Beyond (2017 TV series)#Cast from User:Amaury/sandbox/List of Beyond episodes. Thought you could use it for the live article. Role names are from IMDB, which I believe are the common names. There are three actors, however, that are at the four-appearance border. Would any of those qualify as recurring, notable, or neither? I'm also unsure if Kevin should be listed above or below Young Holden. Kevin was starring in the pilot, as you know, while Young Holden was only a guest star—so in that regard, it would be ordered by importance, and starring -> guest starring (Kevin -> Young Holden)—but in terms of guest starring, Young Holden first appeared as a guest star in the first episode, while Kevin first appeared as a guest star in the second episode. In that case, it would be Young Holden -> Kevin. Not really sure what to go by. Ad: I'm not sure Emilija Baranac as Jamie is, but she must have been a co-star, which of course we shouldn't list.

Also, the entire Famous in Love will take a while as I've still only seen the first episode of the second season. The rest of the episodes are still on my DVR, it's just a matter of getting around to it. lol Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

I never watched Beyond so I can't help on the "recurring" question. I will just say again that I generally believe that 4 episodes is not enough to qualify for "recurring" – 5 or 6 episode appearances is a better benchmark IMO. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:41, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Okay. Not included. I've also done a complete overhaul and expanded the Production and Broadcast sections, the latter now under Release: User:Amaury/sandbox/Beyond (2017 TV series). So if you want to use that for the live article, feel free to copy and paste. In addition to the recurring/notable, I couldn't find anything that supported the last names Matthews and McArdle, so those should probably be removed, which I did in my page. They were likely on Disney ABC Press, but archives don't work since the bios themselves load with Javascript, so we go with the next best thing I'll be doing the same with Famous and Love soon. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IJBall/Archive_20&oldid=1045691274"