User talk:SNIyer12/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Nomination of Canucks–Flames rivalry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canucks–Flames rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canucks–Flames rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Resolute 16:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
MLB Rivalries
Can you please discuss controversial changes on the talk page first? Also, you cannot use another Wikipedia article as precedent for what should be on this artice. Thanks.Ultimahero (talk) 04:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Sir, I'm at least coming to you to talk. You cannot make those edits if you will not discuss them.Ultimahero (talk) 15:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Super Bowl Rivalries of the NFL
Why did you blank the page and redirect it to NFL Rivalries? I don't see anything on the talk page. Was it nominated for deletion or something?Ultimahero (talk) 08:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- Since you haven't answered I'm going to go ahead an revert it. Please explain such a move before making it, or direct me to where such a conversation has taken place. Thank you.Ultimahero (talk) 18:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Primary Rivals
Please stop adding information regarding the Mets-Phillies being "primary rivals" into completely unrelated articles, such as Mets-Yankees rivalry. I spoke with User:Killervogel5 as you requested, and he agrees with me that such references should not be added to articles as you have been doing. Please see the talk page at Mets-Phillies rivalry for reference. The information has absolutely no relevance to the topic at hand.
Additionally, you have repeatedly cited the GA status of Mets-Phillies rivalry as a basis for such edits, but you will see that article has been nominated for a GA reassessment.
I'm assuming good faith and believe your intention is to simply improve the articles, but I have noticed a pattern of such edits and think they are counter-productive. The edit history of such pages shows that I'm not the only one. Thank you. TempDog123 (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- I am fine with how you've reworded this information. Thank you for addressing my concerns. TempDog123 (talk) 19:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
--24.233.221.35 (talk) 06:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)DXFGHVGTDSXDFGYHRFEWWSaqASWERDRGFTHYTGYUTRQ
Phillies-Pirates
Your continued insistence on putting the "NHL" rivalry and fan dislike on that page is completely inappropriate. We've talked about this before. You made this exact same edit on June 5th, 6th,7th, and 8th. Each day I told you it wasn't relevant. And, what did you do? Instead of taking up the discussion on the talk page you simply reinserted it several times. Now, after waiting a month and a half, you put the material in again, even though you know we had this disagreement before. That's not okay. Why do you insist on avoiding the talk page?Ultimahero (talk) 16:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
William Shea
Why did you remove you comment on the talk page? Did you change your opinion?Ultimahero (talk) 23:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
List of Philadelphia Phillies seasons
Regardless of the fact that the Phillies have qualified for the 2011 postseason, information about the 2011 season/postseason should not be inserted until the season is complete. What happens if the Phillies team dies in a plane crash? Just stop with the speculation and future-pushing and be patient. — KV5 • Talk • 17:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Template:US Sunday Talk Shows has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Ryulong (竜龙) 03:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Edgar Rentería
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edgar Rentería. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 12:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello SNIyer12! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Red Sox-Rays rivalry
A tag has been placed on Red Sox-Rays rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Orioles-Yankees rivalry
A tag has been placed on Orioles-Yankees rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cardinals-Pirates rivalry
A tag has been placed on Cardinals-Pirates rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Brewers-Pirates rivalry
A tag has been placed on Brewers-Pirates rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cubs-Pirates rivalry
A tag has been placed on Cubs-Pirates rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pirates-Reds rivalry
A tag has been placed on Pirates-Reds rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Braves-Pirates rivalry
A tag has been placed on Braves-Pirates rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Orioles-Pirates rivalry
A tag has been placed on Orioles-Pirates rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Yankees–Red Sox rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Ellis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Consensus link
Hey, last March you removed the quotes on 2008 American League Championship Series, I was just wondering if there is a link where I can read this consensus? Thanks. CRRaysHead90 | We Believe! 03:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Flyers-Penguins rivalry
Once again, please refrain from inserting your point of view concerning the 2010 Stanley Cup playoffs on the Flyers-Penguins rivalry page. Your opinion is just that - an opinion. None of it is factual or relevant. You cannot justify or predict what would have happened had the two teams played each other. Darthflyer (talk) 09:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wild Card Wednesday, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
1994 SCF
Please refrain from adding your opinion on what the 1994 Stanley Cup Final was "best known for". While it is a fact that no Canadian team made the Finals between 1994 and 2004, it is not mentioned anywhere in the sources you have provided as being what that year was best remembered for. The source simply states that 2004 is the first time since 1994 that a Canadian team made the Finals. As it stands, you are adding personal opinion that has no place in these articles, particularly because it has no factual backing. – Nurmsook! talk... 22:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- There is no issue with you saying 1994 was the last time until 2004 that a Canadian team played in the Stanley Cup Finals, as it was heavily mentioned in the years in between in the media. However, where there is a major problem is you claiming that 1994 was "best known for" being the last time that a Canadian team made the Finals until 2004. As I said, there is no mention of that fact in any reference you have provided, so the statement that 1994 was best remembered for that is not tied down in fact, which is against Wikipedia policy. Unless you can find a WP:RS that states "the 1994 Stanley Cup Final was best remembered for being the last SCF in which a Canadian team participated until 2004", then your statement belongs in none of the articles you added it to (and therefore the reason why I removed it from all that I could find). – Nurmsook! talk... 22:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Further, your consistent addition of the trivial fact around current Rangers staff and players is again something that doesn't belong in these articles. What do these current players and staff have anything to do with the 1994 New York Rangers? Nothing. – Nurmsook! talk... 22:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Jets-Giants and "Moment of Peace" Redux
SNIyer, there is NOTHING in the cited sources about a "moment of peace" in the rivalry. Why do you keep adding that phrase to EVERY sports rivalry article that you edit? Besides the fact that it's your own invention and hasn't been mentioned in a single source you've included that I have seen, it's terrible editorship to use the same phrase ad nauseum in every single article.
Let me explain what is wrong with it with respect to the Jets-Giants rivalry. NOWHERE does it say that Governor Spitzer declaring the parade "New York Giants Super Bowl Champions Day" brought peace to the three New York State teams. That is something that you're inferring from the article. THIS IS ORIGINAL RESEARCH! It's NOT mentioned in the cited source! I could just as easily infer that Governor Spitzer making such a declaration would be upsetting to the Bills and Jets and fuel the flames of the rivalry! That is why you need to be able to cite to something that is directly contained within a secondary source. Paraphrasing something is fine. Creating something that does not exist within the source is not. You should know this given how long you've been editing. TempDog123 (talk) 07:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Input request
You have contributed to article The Really Big Show (formerly Rizzo on the Radio). This article is currently being considered for deletion. Please consider providing input at the article's discussion page: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Really_Big_Show. Levdr1lostpassword (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
An award for you
|
Golden Wiki Award
In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.115 (talk) 20:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Reds-Cardinals rivalry
A tag has been placed on Reds-Cardinals rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- I am still watching your edits. That WP:COATRACKing on Philip Humber's perfect game as well as your attempts to recreate deleted material are unacceptable. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Reds–Cardinals rivalry
A tag has been placed on Reds–Cardinals rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Howdy SNIyer12. Will you PLEASE stop adding trivia to hockey articles.
One part of Aftermath section should be revised on Mark Buehrle perfect game page. It says that a walk foiled his bid for consecutive perfect games and consecutive no-hitters, but a walk wouldn't end a no-hit bid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.190.145 (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I think the edits you made this morning to List of Major League Baseball stadiums -- highlighting the three stadiums where World Series were won in their inaugural seasons -- were interesting and good faith but outside the scope of the listing. If we're going to draw special attention to the stadiums that have hosted inaugural-year series, why not inaugural-year league champions, or division champions? Why not the stadiums that have the most Series wins? Why not those that have hosted the most All-Star games? Why not stadiums that have sold out their entire first year, or first two years, three years, five years? (Attendance figures would actually be more appropriate to this listing than team performance stats).
Yes, I know, the World Series victory is the Big Enchilada. I suppose it wouldn't be disruptive to the table if we made the "Year opened" entry a link to that year's World Series article (as you did for the Cardinals). But the highlighted band certainly had to go. What if the team that builds the next domed stadium also wins the World Series that year? Which highlight color would we pick? ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 15:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- (moved this here from my talk page so we get the entire conversation in one place) We would have to pick a different color for a team winning a World Series in their first year in a domed stadium. The only reason why I put a color for World Series won by team in first year is because it has been noted in the other articles. – SNIyer12, (talk), 16:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- I suppose, but how many different highlighter colors are we going to use? Currently it's easy to tell at a glance which are the outdoor stadiums, which are the indoor stadiums, and which are both (ie retractable roof). I think this makes sense; whether the playing surface is affected by the elements is probably the most important bit of data that differentiates the stadiums, unless surface type (grass/artificial) is. The fact that the Red Sox won the Series in 1912, or the Cards in 2006 or the Yanks in 2009, is not an intrinsic quality of their ballparks; it's trivia, and in a listing that compresses so much basic information into a limited space, it's clutter. ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 16:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- (moved from my talk) It would be better to wikilink the year the stadium opened if it opened with a World Series championship to avoid all the clutter. – SNIyer12, (talk), 16:13, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. Cheers. ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 16:17, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
“RFK Bridge” renaming discussion
Efb91 (talk · contribs) is requesting that “Robert F. Kennedy Bridge” be moved back to its old title of “Triborough Bridge”. Since you participated in the last move discussion, I figured I’d bring it to your attention. This new discussion is at Talk:Robert F. Kennedy Bridge#Proposal To Change Improper Article Title; Triborough Bridge Is Common-Use Name According to Wall Street Journal.. Larry V (talk | email) 01:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited 2010 Winter Olympics opening ceremony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Furlong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
File:PayingRespectsToTrudeau.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PayingRespectsToTrudeau.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eagles–Giants rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Navratri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dussehra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
GA Thanks
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial efforts that has contributed to the recent WP:GA promotion of Philip Humber's perfect game
 | This user helped promote Philip Humber's perfect game to good article status. |
--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Disruptive editing
You have now been asked multiple times by multiple editors to stop trying to reinsert that trivial piece of drought information into many different articles. If you continue to insert it in a WP:POINT like way against consensus you will be blocked. -DJSasso (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
You make many useful maintenance edits and so I wish you would avoid making edits that a consensus of editors have agreed are not an improvement, as this just wastes everyone's time. If you have any new discussion points that have not been raised before, please feel free to raise them on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey page (to keep the discussion in one place). Rest assured that your previous comments on this subject have been read and considered, so you do not need to restate them. I hope you will engage with others and try to build consensus, rather than simply proceeding ahead without discussion. isaacl (talk) 17:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- For baseball-related matters, I encourage you to raise any new discussion points on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball page, and not continue with periodic edit/revert cycles. isaacl (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Have we not gone through this before? SNIyer12? Please stop re-adding the information-in-question, on hockey articles. GoodDay (talk) 19:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
You just did it again at 1996 New York Yankees season, even though we went through this in August, with Spanneraol also against you. I'm sick of this. I think it's beyond time we take this for an intervention. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- A discussion on these edits of yours is ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball#User talk:SNIyer12.23Disruptive editing. I think we would all appreciate it if you would join the discussion and help resolve these issues amicably. Resolute 17:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
SNIyer12, I suggest you wisen up & start responding to concerns 'here'. This snob approach on your part, is counter-productive. GoodDay (talk) 19:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
ANI notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AutomaticStrikeout 20:47, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Would you please comment at the ANI discussion?
Please comment at the ANI discussion...right now the consensus seems to be some sort of ban, which means I would suggest you explain yourself there. v/r Go Phightins! 02:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
Hello, I'm Go Phightins!. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2011 Washington Redskins season without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Go Phightins! 04:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)- In order to be unblocked, you must be prepared to discuss your own behaviour, and show that you understand how you have been causing problems. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- Note that user is suspected of block evasion.—Bagumba (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Tyler Kepner listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tyler Kepner. Since you had some involvement with the Tyler Kepner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
U Party With Fox News listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U Party With Fox News. Since you had some involvement with the U Party With Fox News redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Unblock Request
SNIyer12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My apologies for not being on for a while. I'm very sorry for my rude behavior. I was just editing details in pages as to why they were necessary. I've learned from my mistakes and I'm ready to move on. I have just been busy with work. But I believe that I've learned my lesson and will not make this mistake 15:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You'll have to address the past issues in greater detail to enable us to ascertain that you have understood why your behaviour was problematic and to tell what you'll do to prevent those issues from re-occurring. Huon (talk) 21:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- A note to any admin looking at future unblock requests, the user has continued with the same edits that caused the indef block through multiple IPs and has had to be blocked on them many times. I'd suggest it be put before the community to decide on an unblock before one is made as he has been a prolific problem editor. -DJSasso (talk) 17:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:CBSEveningNewsAnchors
Template:CBSEveningNewsAnchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:NBCEveningNewsAnchors
Template:NBCEveningNewsAnchors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
File source problem with File:VicePresidentRichardCheneyEulogyReagan.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:VicePresidentRichardCheneyEulogyReagan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Presidential Candidate listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Presidential Candidate. Since you had some involvement with the Presidential Candidate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)