Jump to content

User talk:Gabr-el

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Tourskin)


Assyrians in Ottoman Culture- New Book

[edit]

Shlama Meeakrah, I was viewing the Wiki Assyria project page and I came across to Assyrians in Ottoman culture under articles to be created. I found a very relevant book to start this article here [[1]] and here [[2]] or[[3]] I just wanted to let you know, I will leave the same message for other aturayeh and perhaps we come up with a list of books and sources so we start the article. Allahah Natorrokh Ninevite (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shimit Omtan

[edit]

I want to ask you something, the current standing to move the Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac/Babylonian/Sumerian/Aramaean/Iraqi/Mehsheehahyah/Nestorian/Jacobite/Syrian/Akkadian/Maronite/Phoenecian name back to Assyrian people is 6-3, clearly a consensus has been reached but someone has removed it from Wikipedia Requested Moves for whatever reason. Can you place it back on requested moves I am not sure how to go about the process, the directions are here [[4]] but they are a little confusing. Here is the link clearly showing what side has won [[5]] its a little bit lower than the start of the paragraph. Provide this link for the page as proof that a unanimous decsion has been reached 6-3 with the overwhelming majority wanting it back to Assyrian People. GodSpeed! Ninevite (talk) 03:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not getting back to you earlier,
Please earise the email after seeing it. Iraqi (talk) 11:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks. Gabr-el

19:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Shlama, the words under the picture of Agha Petros on Assyrians in the UK Article doesn't make grammatical sense. It States "Agha Petros; with no military training he led the Assyrians to no defeat in WWI" when you get the chance aziza fix it. Ninevite (talk) 22:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

[edit]

I hope you have a great 2009 Gabrel. How was England and why were you there? NancyHeise talk 23:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

[edit]

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seminary

[edit]

Gabrel, I just wanted to give you this link which I just saw today about a seminarian who is going to write about his seminary experience each month. It was on Catholic News Service and says he is a graduate of Georgia Tech who worked for a few years in Finance before he decided to go into the seminary. See http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14743 NancyHeise talk 19:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFM

[edit]

Gabrel, this is a standard message being pasted to everyone's page. You are getting it because you voted on use of the wording in the lead sentence as well as everyone else who voted or participated in the discussions.

I began a Request for Mediation here [6] and listed you as a party. Please sign your name here [7] to agree to participate. Thanks. NancyHeise talk 06:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gabrel, can you please post your "agree" on this page [8] toward the bottom so it can be considered for mediation? Thanks! :) NancyHeise talk 19:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chaldean patriarchs - please have a look

[edit]

I, I've recently created some articles about the Chaldean patriarchs, as Joseph Audo, Yohannan Hormizd, Eliya Abulyonan, Nicholas I Zaya. You are probably more expert of me about the Chaldean Church: can you please have a look and copyedit them if needed? Where is possible to get pictures of these patriarchs (photo of old pictures of something similar). Thanks. A ntv (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shlama Azizzi

[edit]

I want to invite you here [9] to get your input. I have recently added 25 sources to back up the claim, but there is some specualtion by the user who has posted a message above me on using the word 'Subset.' Your feedback here will appreciated meeawkrah Ninevite (talk) 22:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Request for mediation accepted

[edit]
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Roman Catholic Church.
For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 21:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

[edit]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]

Hey Tourskin, would you be interested in creating an Assyrian Barnstar with me. I have noticed many other projects have their own barnstar but we dont. I am not sure how to go about the process; if you are interested let me know. As far as the picture goes for the barnstar I think [this is good. Peshenah Ninevite (talk) 01:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you were trying to give a award to User:Chaldean but you ended up giving it to a false user claiming he is chaldean here. Just thought you should know, I think you thought he was him but thats not the case as he is just puppet of our Chaldean. best regards Ninevite (talk) 23:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hawet basima for the award khon. Iraqi (talk) 10:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Roman Catholic Church

[edit]

Hi Gabr-el, I have made a motion to close the mediation for reasons described here [10]. Please come and post either your agreement or disagreement at the same link. Thanks. NancyHeise talk 17:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey my friend

[edit]

After some time out of Wikipedia I am back just letting u now and I will soon make some new byzantine maps and stuff big plans lol.Justinian43 (talk) 20:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

[edit]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrians in the United Kingdom

[edit]

Hi. I notice that Assyrians in the United Kingdom is still largely unsourced. I will start to remove the unsourced material soon if citations are not provided. If you wish to discuss this, please do so here. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gabr-el. You have new messages at Cordless Larry's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi. Just to let you know, I have reverted this edit. It may be a "basic fact" that the UK is closer to Iraq than the US is, but it would require a reference to back up the claim that this is a reason why people migrate to the UK (and this claim is contradicted anyway, by the following statement that more Assyrians live in the US). Plus, language such as "it is a suitable place for immigration" is POV. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

[edit]

Gabr-el, we are voting at mediation on the name of the Church here [11]. Are you OK with changing the article name to Catholic Church and having a lead sentence that states "The Catholic Church, also known as the Roman Catholic Church"? Please cast your vote so we can either find consensus or not for this suggestion. Thanks.

Thanks

[edit]

Just wanted to say hi back. The only reason I retired was because I bullied into a corner by a an aggressive user and then manipulated. I should've ignored him and stayed away from controversial articles. Anyway back to your discussion. The Islamic Golden Age is a particular sensitive subject for me. Many people still (ignorantly) deny that this kick started science in many ways in the modern world. But sadly from experiance I've learned that most users here delibratly ignore all contributions made by Islamic civilisation becuase they associate their own personal stigma's to it. I've also learned this another from of hatred that has been masked. But slowly as history progresses this hatred will go. Aristotlian Philosophy is an amazing subject area that I want to delve into in the near future (even I didn't know it existed let alone it was brought by the Islamic Civilisation to the world). Thanks for making me feel better, I now know there exists froms of goodness in Wikipedia's community. This is a life lesson I've learned too. I'd like to continue this discussion if you'll please. (also sorry for the late reply. I just came to check on any messages I had. I might come back to edit -- but nothing is certain.) LOTRrules Talk Contribs 23:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Greece April 2009 newsletter

[edit]

The April 2009 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.--Yannismarou (talk) 02:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Debate?

[edit]

[12] What do you want to say? I remmber that there was a French historian [13], who said that something like that the history is not a job of politicians, it is the job of historians, and he was angry for the French law which said that there was Armenian genocide. You say that everyone has a right for speech but on the other your politicians are forbidding a right of speech thanks to the eastern barbarians. --144.122.250.144 (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Armenians done the same things in Ottoman Emp. too (massacre), to occupy the Ottoman lands. And when Turkish civilians reply it is called genocide? If it is genocide then there were Turkish genocide too, before the Armenian. But when the officials come to transport Armenians to another location it is called genocide too? --144.122.250.144 (talk) 01:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Assyrian People

[edit]

I see that the poll opened on the 9th. According to WP:REQUESTED MOVES the survey should stay open for five days. Therefore, it wouldn't be wise for any adm to move the page until the 15th, even if the consensus looks pretty obvious. If consenus remains (which seems to be the most plausible case), I'll close the discussion and move the article, unless of course another sysop is faster than me!--Yannismarou (talk) 07:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

I have blocked you for a short while for disruptive filibustering at Talk:Assyrian people. Dab is right, as long as people with your attitude are dominating these discussions, there will never be a consensus. The only solution is to make editors like you go away. This is only a short warning block. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outrageous!

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gabr-el (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is the meaning of this! I have not expressed my opinion more than twice on the matter in the past four months! I have called for a consensus, done no edits at the article. I have an opinion that is based on consensus! I have called on another administrator to assist me! For what reason have I been blocked? Disruptive editing? I merely put forward my opinion, I used neither foul language nor was I unreasonable; I have given a conditional support, have made numerous contacts with Triz in a very civilized manner before and am blocked for what? Because my opinion on the matter is inconvenient? I was given no warning about any of this sort, I approached this in a very civilized manner. As long as people with my attitude? Are you suggesting that you block all the users who contributed so much to this article?

Decline reason:

Edits like this one are disruptive to the good-faith development of the article. It's attempting to escalate a situation that needs, in the strongest terms, to be defused as soon as possible for the good of the article and Wikipedia. That's how your behavior was disruptive. When you return, please try to avoid being factional about all disputes that arise, and then the article can make progress and compromise and common ground can be found. You were being antagonistic to a point where it was disruptive - civilly, I'll admit, but disruptive nonetheless. Mangojuicetalk 17:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Gabr-el 15:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will discuss with the blocking admin. Mangojuicetalk 17:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
what edits? Be specific, show my error; as far as I am concerned, I have made no disruptive editing. I tried to move the talk page, thats not disruptive, and I undid it. It was done once, and quickly undone. Gabr-el 19:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this block falls under WP:COOLDOWN. To write in a talk-page is different than edit an Article. A ntv (talk) 19:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the current situation:

  • We have one admin who says that I am violating consensus, being disruptive in my edits (yes, my two edits this year can be considered plural) and referring me to WP:IDHT, that admin being dab
  • We have another admin, Future Perfect, who says that my attitude is bad and my "disruptive filibustering". Though my use of bold quotes was obviously not to swear but highlight key points such as the words "unfair" and so forth, and that I have violated WP: IDIDNTHEARTTHAT
  • We have one admin who says that I need a WP:COOLDOWN

If there is going to be a reason for this block, find it, show me my error so I know. Otherwise, remove this block which is based on incorrect, conflicting and different reasons. For the record, I was very civilized in my content with Triz and suggested that it is up to them to create their own article. Gabr-el 19:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin and wp:cooldown is to say that I consider your block exagerated A ntv (talk) 19:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry then and thank you, I think the block was very rushed. And it remains unexplained beyond a simple link. Gabr-el 23:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am an admin, and it looks to me like a bad block. I'd be open to seeing evidence otherwise, but from the evidence shown on this page so far, I see no justification for a block. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

with its blatantly hostile, non-cooperative attitude - this is even funnier than the block itself. Blatantly hostile? Non-cooperative? Wow, such strong words. What would we call a user who does not use a consensus, discuss civilly with opposing users and call on other admins? A savage animal? Gabr-el 23:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fut Per, It seems that your intention is to remain silent until the block expires, so that you do not have to defend your indefensible block. If this is the case, I see to it that the first edit I make after my unblock will be reporting this unfair block. Ntv has rightly (thank you) pointed out that you have blocked me to "warn me" about my (non-existent) filiblustering. I myself would define such a word as involving two or more discussion posts, not the one paragraph that is trying to explain my logic behind my thinking. Wikipedia states : Blocks should not be used solely for the purpose of recording warnings or other negative events in a user's block log. The practice, typically involving very short blocks, is often seen as punitive and humiliating. You can either respond and show me my error and I will apologize and repent; or you can unblock me and apologize for the unnecessary block; or you can wait it out/give no reason and I report the unfair block.Gabr-el 00:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it was me

[edit]

When you have something contrary to say, it's usually not right to say it in public.  :)

mutual. --VKokielov (talk) 16:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am a Georgian Jew and a little bit Russian. By the way, there are still some Assyrians in Georgia, though I understand that you don't belong to the Assyrian branch?
I used to know Hebrew when I lived in Israel. Now, pursuant to the way I take up these things, I decided, alongside rejuvenating Hebrew, to learn Syriac. All the more since I've become keenly interested in Christianity after reading Leo Tolstoy's interpretation of it.

--VKokielov (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But of course I missed the essence again. You are Assyrian. Pleased to meet you.  :) --VKokielov (talk) 19:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

God bless you too!

[edit]

Thank you for my mothers day card! You made my day! I left a note for you on my talk page. You are so sweet - I hope all is well with you. Let me know how you are doing, you can email me too if you like, there is a link on my userpage. :-D NancyHeise talk 01:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RCC mediation

[edit]

A draft of the note under mediation is up for comments here [14]. Thanks, NancyHeise talk 11:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gabr-el, got your note on my page - neat story about the card! Im glad you are doing well, I pray for you when I pray for priests and I ask God to make sure they are taking care of you properly in the seminary. One of our new priests in the Diocese of Palm Beach once gave a homily on the difficulties of the seminary life. He mentioned that he entered with several other men but that some of them left before they were all finished. Another man I knew when he was in seminary but is now a priest for Archdiocese of Miami once complained to me and a group of others that he was being moved against his will to another location and felt that he was better off in his present location. I told him that my pastor (at the time) was sent to my church when the bishop asked him to come even though he was very happy at the parish he was already leading. He left all his friends and comforts to come be pastor of the largest parish in the Archdiocese with some construction problems with the school that were causing the school construction to go way over estimated cost. He was such a good pastor and I always viewed his personal sacrifice as an act of love for us - people he did not even know. After fixing our church issues, he got moved again to pastor another church near where his original church was so he got to go back to his friends. I think I cried for three months when he left. I was not the only one, he really touched us and challenged us in spiritual ways to do better. We became the model for "twinning" - where a rich parish takes care of an inner city poor parish or a parish in a third world country. We went from a do nothing group of people to doing really neat social works together that really built love and community. Anyway, I am telling you this because I am hoping you see that all the issues you face in seminary will probably also be faced out in the field too so don't get discouraged.
A neat book about a priest overcoming difficulty is "The Life of Michael Tansi", an African priest ministering to pagan communities in Africa. The beginning of the book is kind of slow but the rest is amazing stuff. He changed everyone's lives for the better but he suffered in making it happen. NancyHeise talk 02:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the RCC mediation, there is no vote as of yet. The agreement was to change the article name to "Catholic Church" and the first sentence states "The Catholic Church, also known as the Roman Catholic Church (note 1)...". The link above directs you to where we are discussing the agreed text of the new note. There is a section below the note and refs where comments are being solicited. If you don't like the note for some reason or if you like it, just say so in that section. NancyHeise talk 02:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, I will keep you and all of them together with you in my prayers for you! Thanks for sharing, that is really good news! NancyHeise talk 19:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RCC Mediation

[edit]

Your input is needed here [15] to decide on one of three options. Thanks, NancyHeise talk 03:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RCC mediation

[edit]

Sorry to bother you again, we now have an option 4 to consider since no one could agree on 1,2 or 3. Can you please come vote again? [16] Thanks, NancyHeise talk 18:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gabr-el, I know it is getting confusing over there but we all decided to rename the article Catholic Church and change the lead sentence to "The Catholic Church, also known as the Roman Catholic Church" with a new note after "Roman Catholic Church" that discusses the difference in the terms and how they are used.

Option 1 was to make the changes to the article and deal with any objections on the talk page. Option 2 was to change only the agreed note and put the article name change on the talk page for discussion. Option 3 was to put the name and note change decision on the talk page for discussion from the wider community before we make any changes to the article.

No one could agree on any one option so Sunray proposed option 4 which would

Option 4 - 1) We summarize the mediation outcome along the following lines: A consensus of participants in this mediation (a supermajority) has arrived at the following proposal: The lead sentence be changed, along with a supporting note and a change of the name of the article to "Catholic Church." 2) We move the summary to the talk page for a consultation period with a fixed end date. 3) We focus the discussion on WP:Naming conventions and WP:Naming conflicts, particularly the objective criteria (specified above).

A properly focused, evidence based discussion would allow for all perspectives to be brought forward but directed towards the intent of meeting the criteria for naming. I would probably ask for an additional mediator to assist to ensure we can keep the discussion on the rails. Would such an approach meet the various concerns raised? Sunray (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I voted for option 4 NancyHeise talk 19:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic Church mediation outcome

[edit]

Hi, you are receiving this message because you were an original party to the mediation process regarding the Catholic Church name issue. The mediation outcome has been summarized and moved to the Catholic Church talk page here [17]. Please feel free to come join our discussion of the outcome taking place now before making the actual changes in the article. Thanks for your help and kind cooperation toward a mutually agreeable solution. NancyHeise talk 14:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request move

[edit]

Hello, since you participitated Talk:Assyrian_people#Requested_move, I was wondering if you could do the same for the rest of related pages at Talk:Assyrian/Syriac_diaspora#Request_Move. Iraqi (talk) 00:07, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi my friend, I watched through the video you linked me to with Parpola a couple of times. I'm guessing it's the first part you want me to comment on, right? Well, it isn't anything new he says, I guess you've also heard of the theories about the silent "aleph". About the word Sureth (the name of the language) deriving from Asureth, i'm not really sure where he gets that from, haven't heard anything about it and so I can't really comment on that, but we both know that Parpola is pro-Assyrian and you can't swallow every word of his as granted, you have to read and listen to him with critical eyes and ears. Sorry I couldn't be more to help, take care ahono. The TriZ (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If your really interested ahon, then you should read user:Garzo's talkpage archives. There is so much interesting reading there. I've learned a lot reading Garzo's comments. The TriZ (talk) 02:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is an on-going kind of "debate" between two users in Swedish wiki (not me :)) about this, and I noticed one of the sources used [18]. It shows that there aren't one obvious theory, but many vague theories. The TriZ (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:1389.PNG

[edit]

File:1389.PNG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:1389 Mediterranean Sea.PNG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:1389 Mediterranean Sea.PNG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1350.PNG is now available as Commons:File:1350 Mediterranean Sea.PNG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:1328.PNG is now available as Commons:File:1328 Mediterranean Sea.PNG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:1263.PNG is now available as Commons:File:1263 Mediterranean Sea.PNG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vote Re CC origins and historians differing POV's

[edit]

Hello Gabr-el, sorry to bother you but we are having a vote on the Catholic Church page regarding whether or not to include the dispute among historians regarding the Church origins. Can you please come an give us your vote so we can come to consensus? Vote is taking place here [19] Thanks! NancyHeise talk 01:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How are you doing? How's the seminary going? Did you find a wife yet? : ) NancyHeise talk 05:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing Byzantium under the Heraclians up to GA/FA status

[edit]

Hello! I just figured out who you were because the name threw me off- I'm sure you might remember me from a year or two ago when I was more active. Anyways, I am currently working hard to include a lot of new material and update some things in Byzantium under the Heraclians so that it might just get to GA or (gulp) FA status. I thought it would be best to get some feedback so that I'm not slaving by myself and getting no input as let's face it, it is not really visited all that much from editors. I saw right off that it was all pretty much Norwich, but with some Ostrogorsky, Treadgold, and Bury mixed in, it might just make it up the scale. I try very, very hard to keep as much of the original text as possible- stop by any let me know what you think! Monsieurdl mon talk-mon contribs 00:28, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the positive response! I'm sure after looking at what I have written over and over again, it will become more of a sculpture and less of a pile of molded clay. There is just too much good information to include for it to ever be boring, stodgy, however you wish to call it. Thanks again!

Monsieurdl mon talk-mon contribs 01:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Motor Pool (Biology)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Motor Pool (Biology) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Btilm  04:59, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church

[edit]

Hi Gabr-el, we are discussing the sex abuse paragraph here [20]. I am trying to get some past editors to come to the discussion so we can discover what others think. Thanks, NancyHeise talk 19:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC) PS. let me know how everything is going with you OK? NancyHeise talk 19:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:550 Roman.PNG listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:550 Roman.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gabr-el, what a joy to hear from you - I answered you on my talk page. NancyHeise talk 04:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page for Byzantine-related new articles

[edit]

Hello Gabr-el! I have created a list for new or recently de-stubbed articles that relate to the Byzantine Empire. I hope that everyone contributing on the subject will add his/her articles there, so that other interested users will be able to find it easily. BTW, I have tried to find all such articles for 2010, but some may have escaped my notice. If you find any missing, please add them yourself. Best regards, Constantine ✍ 13:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church RfC

[edit]

Input is welcome at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Catholic Church. Sunray (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrians

[edit]

Hello, Gabr-el! Please join the current discussions in the Assyrian-related articles if you've time. Shmayo (talk) 15:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan Campaign

[edit]

Hi, Gabr-el,

Please see my note on the talk page of Catalan Campaign. Thanks Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seljuk Acquisition of Nicaea

[edit]

The article Seljuk Acquisition of Nicaea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The event is OR per talk page: there appears to have been no notable event (siege, battle, etc) involving the transfer of the city to the Seljuks.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 19:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

[edit]


To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your question about Socrates

[edit]

"whose true views and politics we are never likely to know" - We don't know what Socrates said, Its his student Plato who told us of Socrates teaching, and if you read Plato's writings, you will see he had very different views (In fact very crazy like : No man should be allowed to think or dream even, he should listen to his master only ... such kind of thoughts [This kind of a thought is prevalent in military, and given the fact that was time of war, I think we can understand why Plato thought that way]), so this can create a huge amount of doubt whether what Plato tells us about Socrates is indeed true or not, and hence "we may never know his true views" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firehawk895 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:55, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

[edit]

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:C.1250's.PNG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:C.1250's.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1070's.PNG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1070's.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

[edit]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Nikephorian Wars listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nikephorian Wars. Since you had some involvement with the Nikephorian Wars redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Constantine ✍ 13:18, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Byzantine–Seljuq Wars

[edit]

Byzantine–Seljuq Wars, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 07:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gabr-el. You have new messages at Talk:Byzantine–Seljuq Wars.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Location Greece EU Europe-1- +Aegean Islands.PNG missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 05:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of And the Violins Stopped Playing for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article And the Violins Stopped Playing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/And the Violins Stopped Playing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Transcendence (talk) 23:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:717 byzantium.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]




Out with the old...

[edit]
For 2014: Wishing you a Healthy, Happy and Fulfilling NEW YEAR! Shir-El too 19:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC) (image: NASA Mars Rover, sunset)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Siege of Cotyaeum

[edit]

The article Siege of Cotyaeum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources (AFAIK) or details on this event; the fact that the city fell to the Turks is undisputed, whether there was a siege or not appears to be conjecture. With the total lack of any detail on the event whatsoever, an article is not warranted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 20:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Assyrian-siege engine.JPG

[edit]

The file File:Assyrian-siege engine.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Location Greece EU Europe-1- +Aegean Islands.PNG

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Location Greece EU Europe-1- +Aegean Islands.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by File:EU-Greece.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:58, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Byzantine-Sassanid wars.PNG

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Byzantine-Sassanid wars.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ahem ...

[edit]

"Rum" refers to the Seljuk sultanate of Rum, not the "Romans." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.51.247 (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Byzantine-Ottoman Wars.PNG

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Byzantine-Ottoman Wars.PNG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Achaemenid Assyria

[edit]

Achaemenid Assyria has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seljuk campaigns in the Aegean for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seljuk campaigns in the Aegean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seljuk campaigns in the Aegean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gabr-el&oldid=1244704660"