Jump to content

User talk:WatkynBassett/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Welcome!

Hi WatkynBassett! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Burnes (surgeon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montrose. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Reason for chaning "Sardar Sir Michael Filose" to "Sir Michael Filose".

Hey, I see that you have undoed my change on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jai_Vilas_Mahal this wikipedia page of Jay Vilas Palace. I have seen many articles mentioning him as a Sardar. If you could tell me the reason as why calling him "Sardar Sir Michael Filose" is wrong. It would be helpful, enlightning. --MShreyanshu (talk) 08:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the message! I followed MOS:HONORIFIC, according to which honorific prefixes—styles and honorifics in front of a name—should generally not be included in the article body. WatkynBassett (talk) 09:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC).

Any reason why you added the malfunctioning mask back on Amy Coney Barrett?

Hey, I saw that you undid my change to the published works section of this page. I'm not sure why. The mask is adding dashes in place of author names on her work - and it's inconsistent with the appearance of other Supreme Court Justices pages - see, e.g. Sonya Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch. If you can explain why you think the malfunctioning mask "looks better" I'd appreciate it. 06:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NDSteve10 (talk • contribs)

Many thanks for reaching out! I was following the Manual of Style guideline for bibliographies on Wikipedia, which states: "Template may be used to format bibliography entries; for single-author lists, use |author-mask= to avoid repeating the author's name." Kind regards WatkynBassett (talk) 16:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Reichsoberhandelsgericht

On 4 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reichsoberhandelsgericht, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that for more than six decades no federal supreme court existed in the German territories until the Reichsoberhandelsgericht was formed in 1869? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reichsoberhandelsgericht. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Reichsoberhandelsgericht), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the article which is also featured on Portal:Germany --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:23, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks for your kind words!WatkynBassett (talk) 20:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Franzen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page How to Be Alone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Kingdom of Britain

Hello, sorry to bother you! I created a disambiguation page in place of the redirect: Kingdom of Britain. I'm not sure if I did everything right, please take a look. I will be very grateful, thanks! --145.15.244.234 (talk) 13:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for reaching out and sorry for answering late. As I see it, your proposal received support here, so I gather your issue will be resolved soon! WatkynBassett (talk) 07:44, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for List of justices of the Federal Constitutional Court

On 26 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of justices of the Federal Constitutional Court, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Claus Leusser, a justice of the German Federal Constitutional Court, served for only four months? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of justices of the Federal Constitutional Court. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, List of justices of the Federal Constitutional Court), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Precious

justices

Thank you for quality articles around German courts and their people, such as List of justices of the Federal Constitutional Court, Reichsoberhandelsgericht, Oberappellationsgericht der vier Freien Städte and Carl Georg von Wächter, for making, updating and correcting infoboxes, for "thank you for reaching out", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2735 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I am deeply honoured to receive this absolutely unexpected award, it kinda made my day. That said, let me take this opportunity to say, that you have done amazing work for the public good – free and universal knowledge – here for a decade, Gerda Arendt, I am deeply impressed. WatkynBassett (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, blushing a bit. Someone told me to pass the award for someone's first DYK, and I didn't quite manage for your first, but see a bright future, - thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hun speech

Hello! Your submission of Hun speech at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik (talk) 19:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Lloyd Hall (Bremerhaven)

Want to clean this up and add to it? It could be another DYK, or we could add it to the Hun speech for a double. --evrik (talk) 21:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I am a little bit busy at the moment and know next to nothing about Lloyd, let alone this building - but I will certainly think about it. Thanks for the kind offer! WatkynBassett (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Hun speech

On 3 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hun speech, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the former German chancellor Bernhard von Bülow called Wilhelm II's 1900 Hun speech the "worst speech of that time and perhaps the most disgraceful speech that Wilhelm II [had] ever given"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hun speech. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hun speech), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 29,841 views (1,243.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Dean

Don't hesitate to crop a better one from that video! Vysotsky (talk) 20:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for reaching out! But this is not an area of my expertise, I stick to text creation. Best wishes! WatkynBassett (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Werner Flume nomination

I just need one more inline citation added to send this to DYK. Hopefully you see this so that it gets added and sent up. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I am very sorry that I did not address this earlier as I was quite unexpectedly otherwise occupied. But I will deal with it now and I am very happy about your constructive review of my DYK nomination. WatkynBassett (talk) 11:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Werner Flume

On 11 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Werner Flume, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Werner Flume called a fellow academic assistant a pig for demanding the boycott of professors of Jewish descent in 1933? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Werner Flume. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Werner Flume), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sea of Tranquility (novel)

Hello! Your submission of Sea of Tranquility (novel) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Sea of Tranquility (novel)

On 7 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sea of Tranquility (novel), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olive Llewellyn, a character in the novel Sea of Tranquility, has been called a stand-in for Emily St. John Mandel, the novel's author? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sea of Tranquility (novel). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sea of Tranquility (novel)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Episode article short descriptions

Hey, I removed the short descriptions from the Rings of Power episode articles because they are automatically generated by the infobox per the documentation at Template:Infobox television episode. Was there are a reason you reverted me without acknowledging my change or explaining why they should be restored? - adamstom97 (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message! I must admit that I did not see that you reverted me earlier, I thought that I forgot these episodes. My reasoning was to achieve consistency between the different episodes of the season – now all have the same style of short description. Is an automated process preferable in your view? WatkynBassett (talk) 20:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hopefully just using the auto ones from the infoboxes will keep all of these articles consistent and also consistent with most other episode articles (I'm sure there are others that have overridden the auto description but all of the ones that I work on have not). - adamstom97 (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
@Adamstom.97 Unfortunately, I did not see this inner-season consistency on mobile before – that was the reason for my adding of the short descriptions. But feel free to revert me and I will check in a few days whether inner-season consistency is achieved. If it is not I will reach out to you and we can see how this can be rectified. Have a nice day! WatkynBassett (talk) 21:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for looking into that point re Wilhelm

I have to support another PG Wodehouse fan! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mr Serjeant Buzfuz Thank you for the pleasant exchange, may the Empress of Blandings be a blessing! WatkynBassett (talk) 05:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

It’s a fascinating article. I had never heard of the speech before, and enjoyed reading the article. Thanks for putting it up! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mr Serjeant Buzfuz Thanks! Kind messages like these make editing Wikipedia a pleasant experience! WatkynBassett (talk) 18:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Institutes (Gaius)

On 12 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Institutes (Gaius), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1816, a copy of the long-lost Institutes by the Roman jurist Gaius was discovered, hidden underneath writings by Saint Jerome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Institutes of Gaius. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Institutes (Gaius)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Miller Arnold case

On 30 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Miller Arnold case, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Frederick the Great personally convicted six judges for their involvement in the Miller Arnold case and sentenced them to a custodial penalty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Miller Arnold case. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Miller Arnold case), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 5,541 views (461.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 01:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I just read Miller Arnold case. A fascinating episode, thanks for writing about it!

—Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

This is very kind and generous of you, Compassionate727! It means a lot that people actually read the somewhat esoteric articles I am interested in! WatkynBassett (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for A Man and His Dog (novella)

On 7 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A Man and His Dog (novella), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the dog in A Man and His Dog was modelled after Thomas Mann's real-life dog Bauschan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Man and His Dog (narrative). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, A Man and His Dog (novella)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, WatkynBassett!

Happy New Year!

WatkynBassett,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks Abishe! Happy New Year to you too! WatkynBassett (talk) 12:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Hi Watkyn Bassett! Looking backwards, looking forwards, best wishes for the New Year. Happy wikifying! (Regardless of UTC, it is still January 1 where I'm posting!) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
@Mr Serjeant Buzfuz Many thanks! Happy new year to you too! WatkynBassett (talk) 08:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Reason for undoing proof

Hi there—I saw you undid my changes on the direct calculation section of Monty hall problem that improved the intuitiveness and clarity of a proof. I was hoping to understand why you did this or if there was anything I could change to prevent my edits from being undone in the future. Thank you. GabeTucker (talk) 04:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi GabeTucker! Thank you for reaching out. I understand that it is often frustrating when an edit is undone – especially if one has no idea why. I reverted you because you were reverted before. Wikipedia has a policy known as WP:BRD. This means that one should be bold and simply make the change they want, as you did. But if one user disagrees, he can also simply revert you. After this revert, you, as the changing editor, have the obligation to go to the talk page and discuss your edit. As you did not do this, but just did your reverted edit again, I reverted you with "as before". It was not a judgment of the value of your edit, but simply the hint that you have to go to the talk page and explain your edit and gain consensus for it. Happy editing! WatkynBassett (talk) 06:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your detailed and helpful response! I am new to editing on Wikipedia, so when I saw my changes were immediately undone, I assumed there had been a glitch with my changes being saved and made them again. Next time, I'll go to the talk page and explain my edit rather than reverting the changes. I appreciate your explanation! GabeTucker (talk) 07:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
@GabeTucker Great! I am glad I did not discourage you with my harsh "as before"! Next time I will hopefully remember to explain myself a bit more when reverting a new-ish editor. Happy editing! WatkynBassett (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal Administrative Court (Germany), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saxonia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Reflections of a Nonpolitical Man

On 20 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reflections of a Nonpolitical Man, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nobel laureate Thomas Mann reportedly did not want his Reflections of a Nonpolitical Man to be translated into English during his lifetime due to its chauvinistic content? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Reflections of a Nonpolitical Man. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Reflections of a Nonpolitical Man), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Are There Men on the Moon?

On 10 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Are There Men on the Moon?, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Winston Churchill published an essay on extraterrestrial life during the Second World War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Are There Men on the Moon?. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Are There Men on the Moon?), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oskar Baum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilsen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Traute Lafrenz

On 11 March 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Traute Lafrenz, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin

On 14 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin (building pictured) voided the 2021 Berlin state election and ordered a repeat election? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Constitutional Court of the State of Berlin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WatkynBassett/Archive_1&oldid=1155806078"