User talk:Wujastyk

Welcome!

Hello, Wujastyk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bhadani 14:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Science WikiProject

Wujastyk, you might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science--ragesoss 18:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism

Welcome to WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism — a collaborative effort to improve articles about Hinduism

Discussion board — a page for centralised Hinduism-related discussion

Notice board — contains the latest Hinduism-related announcements

Hindu Wikipedians — Wikipedians who have identified themselves as Hindus

Portal — a portal linking to key Hinduism-related articles, images, and categories

Workgroups — projects with a more specific scopes

For more links, go to the project's navigation template.

--D-Boy 23:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Translation

translators are always needed.--D-Boy 06:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Itty-achudan-inscription-from-Hortus-Malabaricus-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Itty-achudan-inscription-from-Hortus-Malabaricus-1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First name

Do you realize how often your books are cited on Wikipedia?[1]

I see that your first name sometimes appears as "Dominick" and sometimes as "Dagomar".[2] I assume from your user page that the former is correct. Will Beback talk 01:17, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Maharishi Vedic Approach to Health. Will Beback talk 06:28, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Comparison of vector graphics editors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Maza.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 14:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Maza concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Maza, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Goldsby

HI, I just undid your addition of John Goldsby to List of jazz bassists. Please read the warning above the edit window and the first line in the edit windows itself. Before such an entry can be included in the list, an article John Goldsby should exist. Feel free to create one. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 11:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Maza

Hello Wujastyk. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Daniel Maza".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Maza}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interested in contributing to the article Ayurveda

Greetings Wujastyk. I have recently been involved in discussion on Talk:Ayurveda. In my research I came across your (I am assuming since you use your full name on your user page that you are not concerned with anonymity, if that is not the case, by all means delete this post) article at Oxford Bibliographies Online. In talking with another editor it was mentioned that you are a WP editor. As you clearly have expertise on the subject and particularly in the scholarly work on the subject I was thinking you could make valuable contributions to the article. Just a thought. Best wishes and happy editing. - - MrBill3 (talk) 09:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it's taken me so long to see your kind suggestion. I'll gladly do what I can when I can :-) My editing at WP is rather haphazard. DomLaguna (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ayurveda

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--John (talk) 11:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm one of the admins watching the Ayurveda page, though I've been largely on "vacation" lately (too busy in real life to do much). Anyway, I saw your invitation to edit above and have been watching the discussion about your edits on the talk page, and I have a suggestion. As you might have noticed, most of the people in the room are hung up arguing about whether Ayurveda is pseudoscience or not. I suggest you ignore that debate for now and try to make unrelated and incremental changes to the article. Initially it will be easier if you just add material, but with time you should be able to edit normally. I know it's a weird way to edit, but the article is in gridlock because of the other debate. Of course it's locked now, but hopefully that will change too. Anyway, thanks for your efforts, and best of luck. ~Adjwilley (talk) 03:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Adjwilley. It's nice to hear a calm, sensible voice about this :-) I'll take your advice. DomLaguna (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

last time I attended to this, I found that I could not edit at all, even in minor ways. The page is locked, and every single byte-change has to be listed, argued over and justified, before someone else adds it. This is too laborious and time-consuming for me. For the moment, Wikipedia is presenting seriously misleading and historically uninformed information about the history of Indian medicine. So be it. DomLaguna (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sanskrit help

Could you give a quick look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Drishti_%28yoga%29#Noun_declension I was curious if it is correct to list the drishtis with these declensions, and if this was the locative or dative case. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iṣṭa Devata (talk • contribs) 17:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I could use some backup on getting a macron into malāsana on the mālāsana page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:M%C4%81l%C4%81sana#Pronounciation_and_spelling Iṣṭa Devata (talk) 05:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC) DomLaguna (talk) 18:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've got too much on my plate at the moment to help with your queries. Best wishes. DomLaguna (talk) 18:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charaka Samhita

Dear Dr Wujastyk, i have been following the discussions on the Indology list and i must say i am very pleased and excited to find you here. I would like you to kindly look into the following issue: the wikipedia page on the Charaka Samhita says the following about the organization of the text:

The extant text has eight sthāna (sections), totalling 120 chapters. These sections are
Sūtra (General principles) - 30 chapters deal with Healthy living, collection of drugs and their uses, remedies, diet and duties of a physician.

Nidāna (Pathology) - 8 chapters discuss the pathology of eight chief diseases.

Vimāna (Specific determination) 8 chapters contain pathology, various tools of diagnostics & medical studies and conduct.

Śārīra (Anatomy) - 8 chapters describe embryology & anatomy of a human body.

Indriya (Sensorial prognosis) - 12 chapters elaborate on diagnosis & prognosis of disease on the basis of senses.

Chikitsā (Theraputics) - 30 chapters deal with special therapy.

Kalpa (Pharmaceutics and toxicology) - 12 chapters describe usage and preparation of medicine.

Siddhi (Success in treatment) - 12 chapters describe general principles of 'Panchkarma.

However, on page 23 of the book 'Science and Society in Ancient India' by Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya (who is mentioned as a source in the References) one finds a significantly different arrangement/organization of this text. Chattopadhyay's book is present in its entirety online: https://books.google.com/books?id=PyGG6jgXsfEC&pg=PA149&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q=sutra-sthana&f=false

Would you please look into this matter? Thank you. Soham321 (talk) 04:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Soham321, thank you for your kind words and enthusiasm. I would love to edit the above pages, and perhaps I'll get round to it. Just now, my plate is too full. Also, I have become disenchanted with Wikipedia editing a bit, specifically with the entry "Ayurveda", where there is a group of anti-pseudo-science people who are making it impossible to edit the entry and make proper sense of it. There is much wrong with the Ayurveda entry, especially the lack of any historical or socio-anthropological perspective. But this group of positivists just can't get past the idea of bashing ayurveda because it isn't "true" (by some inadequately-defined criterion). After wasting some time on it, and getting a lot of criticism, I decided to back away for some months or a year, and perhaps try again later. Perhaps there won't be the same problems with the Charaka entry. That could be a strategy, actually. Fix the things that can be fixed easily (entries on authors and texts) and then gradually re-approach the main "Ayurveda" entry, with references to the good entries elsewhere in WP. Anyhow, I won't get to any of this until later in the year, at the earliest.DomLaguna (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations on your new job!Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 21:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! DomLaguna (talk) 04:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Louis de La Vallée-Poussin

You know the classics, don't you? Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wujastyk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wujastyk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wujastyk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CVN Kalari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CVN Kalari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cvnkalari.in/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is disappointing. I wrote the page myself, citing small fragments of information from outside sources. I cannot help thinking of this deletion as an attempt to suppress information about the topic (CVN Kalari) or my voice, for some unknown reason. I say the latter because at the same time my userpage info has been deleted for inappropriate reasons. I have written a new short entry for CVN Kalari entirely in my own words, with references, so that links from elsewhere have somewhere to land. In time I hope this will be filled out by others with more information about this interesting Indian martial arts centre that has been the subject of anthropological studies and continues to be very culturally influential in south India. Wujastyk 16:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of userpage

@Jimfbleak: I object to your deletion of Wujastyk's user page. You wrote in your edit-summary (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: self-written vanity page, see WP:COI WP:RS WP:Notability (people), not the place for an autobiography. The criterium in question does not refer to WP:USERPAGEs; and I really don't see how those policies which you've linked do apply here. Personally, I find it usefull that Wujastyk explains he's a scholar, and what his topics of interest are. That's not COI; on the contrary. I'd appreciate a further explanation for this. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G11 covers User-pages; G stands for General i.e. applicable over any namespace. ∯WBG^converse 11:25, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noting this, @Joshua Jonathan:. I wouldn't have known about the deletion if you hadn't mentioned it. I am puzzled by the deletion because the entry was a plain, factual piece of information about me, similar to my university home page. It was not promotional, vain or advertising. One important function it played was to disambiguate me from my wife. We both have the same initial "D" and we are both professors working in similar areas of scholarship. I thought it helpful to say that clearly, since I have been contacted here on Wikipedia by people who found it confusing. The user page is not the same as a normal biographical Wikipedia page. I understand that. I also know that it is against Wikipedia rules to write one's own biographical page, so I have never done that. I do not know how to address the problem of this deletion. Does the text still exist somewhere in the wikiverse? Are there edits that would make it less troubling to whoever deleted it? Like you, I'd like further explanation, conversation, and advice on how to do a user page better if that's what's needed. I would like to have a conversation with @Jimfbleak: if they are willing. Wujastyk 16:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page is being kept, but only accessible for authorised editors. Jimfbleak can tell you more, and what to; if he doesn't respond (give it some time), go to the WP:HELPDESK. All the best, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Wujastyk 16:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CVN Kalari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CVN Kalari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. funplussmart (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Funplussmart: None of this makes any sense to me. The page is gone and I see no way to either discuss it with anyone or to retrieve the writing that I originally did. I'm very discouraged about this procedure of rapid deletion without consultation or discussion. The more so since I disagree with the hasty judgement that the page contained copyright materials. I assert strongly that did not, and I challenge the deleting person to demonstrate any copyright infringement. I showed through citations to scholarly literature (Zarrilli etc) that the organization I was writing about is important and has been the subject of study by ethnographers. Wujastyk 21:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Please sign your messages properly using four tildes. Apart from anything else, your pings don't work if they aren't correctly signed

With regard to your user page, see WP:User pages. It's for your activities on Wikipedia and so basic bio, it's not social media or the chance to in effect write an article about yourself, complete with references and external links. You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself and read the guidance below.

Jimfbleak, Reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_pages#What_may_I_have_in_my_user_pages? I see no conflict with my user page that you deleted. Here are my four tildes: Wujastyk 23:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

With regard to the Kalari article, read the guidance below and note that if you post an article directly, it will be assesed as such, if it's not complete, write a draft.

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Your refs were the centre itself, not an independent third-party source and a book (no page range given) which appears to be about the martial art rather than the centre you are writing about
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Nothing you write explains why this place is notable, and whether you think it deserves an article is irrelevant.

you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC) [[==Reply== First the signature. What I am seeing where you have signed on my page looks like a bit like a signature, but doesn't link to your user page and doesn't even show your talk page, let alone link through to it. Same on this page where I've checked, and your attempted pings haven't worked because the wiki sees them as unsigned. I've never seen this before on a four-tildes signature, and I'm consistently seeing it on yours, so I doubt it's the software. Have you tried clicking on your signature to see if it links?[reply]

I see that the four tildes aren't creating a hotlink. I really don't know why this isn't working, or how to fix it. Following this sentence, I am inserting my signature by selecting "Insert/your signature" from the editor menu; it looks exactly like four tildes to me; I see from the "preview" that it's still not giving a clickable link: Wujastyk 19:32, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

I'll shortly recreate the CVN Kalari as Draft:CVN Kalari since it's clearly not ready as a finished article. The autobiography isn't compliant with our user page guidelines, so I'll create as User:Wujastyk/sandbox for now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Jim. I'll go to work on this in the next few days. Four tildes :-) Wujastyk 19:51, 25 April 2019 (UTC) and User:Wujastyk and User talk:Wujastyk

Thanks! I see the problem: it is written in the third person. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you everybody (User:Jimfbleak, User:Joshua Jonathan). I have rewritten my User:Wujastyk page. Could you have a look at tell me if it is now acceptable, and if not, what I should change?

User:Wujastyk Wujastyk 20:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You studied with Gombrich! I envy you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:06, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Joshua Jonathan Yes, as the years have passed, I realize how formative it was, and how good. And apart from all the learnedness, Richard has a wonderful sense of humour! Wujastyk 01:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the main problem with your talk page still is that it has references, and therefore looks as if it's intended to be an article about you, which is inappropriate use of a user page. If you are just telling us about yourself, you don't need to verify what you have written, you can claim what you like on your own page. I therefore suggest that you remove the references. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Jimfbleak I've got rid of the footnotes and pruned a bit. I hope it's now more typical of what others do.User:wujastyk Wujastyk 01:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can live with that, thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:56, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CVN Kalari

Hello, Wujastyk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:CVN Kalari.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guessing you're Dominik Wujastyk?

If so, nice to run across you on Wikipedia. I'm familiar with your name from the Indology listserv. Hölderlin2019 (talk) 00:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Friedrich :-) Yes, the same one (as opposed to all those other Dominik Wujastyks :-) I edit here quite often. Mostly small incremental things, since bigger changes often get reverted. I admire Wikipedia very much; probably the most important experiment in public knowledge ever undertaken. Wujastyk 16:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Monkeyhouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Monkeyhouse.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ayurveda origins

This is about an edit you had made in 2015 to Ayurveda. I wasn't able to find the claim in either of the sources you had added and it appeared to me that it was either Original Research or Synthesis. I've removed it. If you can provide the specific quotes from the sources that you had relied upon (or at least more specific page numbers), please revert me. Hemantha (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify a bit, I was referring to the "first millennium BC" part. The other part on Sankhya, Vaisheshika ideas is clearly referenced. I shouldn't have removed that part, sorry. I've restored it now. Hemantha (talk) 08:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your changes to my original contributions. What I have written was very carefully considered and is all based on sound, university-level, recent published scholarship on the history of medicine. If you disagree, or feel that I should add more or different referencing (you mention page numbers), I would be pleased to discuss the issues and edit the public page accordingly. The fact that you weren't able to find references is a good reason to contact me for discussion, but not to make wholesale revisions. Please revert, and we can discuss issues from now on before making edits to the public pages. If you are indeed happy for me to revert your changes, I'll go ahead. Wujastyk 18:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Libertinus seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to me. I am not associated with the development of this font and I am fully aware of and in compliance with WP NPOV policy. The information about historical responsibility that you deleted is available in the Github README.md for those who choose to dig for more information about the history of the font. Wujastyk (talk) 23:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:MCQ § PD-font?

You are invited to join the discussion at WP:MCQ § PD-font?. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]