Jump to content

User talk:ZI Jony/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

Yorkton Film Festival Golden Sheaf Award - Best of Festival

Thank you for your review of Yorkton Film Festival Golden Sheaf Award - Best of Festival article! Does it get acknowledged somewhere? I was hoping to get the YFF Golden Sheaf Award - Ruth Shaw reviewed and was curious to know how/why this occurs and how I can tell when it has been done... - it is such a mystery. :- ) Regards, LorriBrown (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Red-linked categories

Hi. Per WP:REDNOT you shouldn't have red-linked categories on your user page such as Category:Wikidata translation administrators and Category:Commons file movers. I have no strong views on what the best alternative is, whether changing them to a category that does exist, or creating the categories, but could you do something about them please as they're part of the backlog at Special:WantedCategories that we're trying to clear? TIA Le Deluge (talk) 13:30, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Bengali Wikipedia

Good day; I found you listed at the WP:Local Embassy. I was wondering if you could check on something at Bengali Wikipedia, as I am not a Bengali speaker. A user here - GIMEXCO LTD. - was blocked for violating our policy against corporate usernames and spamming on their userpage. It looks like they have done the same on Bengali Wikipedia (bn:ব্যবহারকারী:GIMEXCO LTD.). I'm not familiar with the policies regarding promotion/advertising and usernames at bn-wiki; I'm guessing they are similar, but I can't be sure without an imperfect machine translation. Would you be able to investigate and report them if they are in violation? Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Drm310, thanks for your notice, that page I tagged for deletion also requested for block/lock. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

April 2020 at Women in Red

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162


April offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ping project

Template:Ping project has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Screenshot showing what the Reply tool looks like
This early version of the Reply tool automatically signs and indents comments.

The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.

Reply tool improved with edit tool buttons
In a future update, the team plans to test a tool for easily linking to another user's name, a rich-text editing option, and other tools.

The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.

  • On 31 March 2020, the new reply tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
  • The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
    • an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
    • a rich-text visual editing option, and
    • other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.

To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.

– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

19:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) is being given away in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, including one week dedicated to South-South East Asia, which includes Bangladesh, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. There's a potential £120 to be won in total for destubbing on any subject or region of your choice. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 11:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020 at Women in Red

May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166


May offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red

June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi ZI Jony, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #2

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Mockup of the new reply feature, showing new editing tools
The new features include a toolbar. What do you think should be in the toolbar?

This issue of the Editing newsletter includes information the Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily.

  • Reply tool: This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature is called "Discussion tools". The Beta Feature will get new features soon. The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing @. You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster now. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.
  • New requirements for user signatures: Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable. Most editors will not be affected.
  • New discussion tool: The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions. You can see the initial design on the project page.
  • Research on the use of talk pages: The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles. We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.

– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

20:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WJRV – The River Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WJRV – The River Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Unblock Mithila Madawa

"ما شاء الله" Mithila Madawa 11:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WJRV – The River Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WJRV – The River Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WJRV – The River Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WJRV – The River Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #3

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

A gold star with a blue ribbon, and the text 50m
More than 50 million edits have been made using the visual editor on desktop.

Seven years ago this month, the Editing team offered the visual editor to most Wikipedia editors. Since then, editors have achieved many milestones:

  • More than 50 million edits have been made using the visual editor on desktop.
  • More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
  • The visual editor is increasingly popular. The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has increased every year since its introduction.
  • In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers (logged-in editors with ≤99 edits) used the visual editor. This percentage has increased every year.
  • Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
  • On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor. 🚀 👩‍🚀
  • Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

12:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

This Month in Education: July 2020

This Month in Education

Volume 9 • Issue 7 • July 2020

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issuse

Peter H Brieger

Hi - thank you for moving this to draft. It's a translation from the German Wikipedia, with additional material that I've researched myself, so I hope it's acceptable/notable, especially as most of Professor Brieger's academic work was done in the English-speaking world (in Canada). Many thanks for your support. CourtauldGill (talk) 13:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks indeed for accepting! CourtauldGill (talk) 15:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
It's ok. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

This Month in Education: August 2020

This Month in Education

Volume 9 • Issue 8 • August 2020

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issuse

September Women in Red edithons

Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Editing news 2020 #4

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Reply tool

The number of comments posted with the Reply Tool from March through June 2020. People used the Reply Tool to post over 7,400 comments with the tool.

The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.

  • More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
  • Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
  • Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[1]

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

New requirements for user signatures

  • The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
  • Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next: New discussion tool

Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

15:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Cover Image in JPG

Hi, the File:JTCCcover.jpg is not the latest cover from our world scientific web site 'https://worldscientific.com/na101/home/literatum/publisher/wspc/journals/covergifs/jtcc/cover.jpg'. Mikewspc (talk) 02:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Mikewspc Latest cover has been uploaded. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

. Many thanks for your help. One more thing to check with you that every new issue cover image I can upload it myself or need your help to do that? Thanks for your time and effort. Mikewspc (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Poster Mulher Oceano

Greetings, how can I upload the movie poster that the director himself sent me? Eddy Oliveira Designer (talk) 18:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Eddy Oliveira Designer, please see Wikipedia:Uploading images. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Dr Greg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mr. Bean, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Dr Greg  talk  12:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Categories

Your mass cat addition is confusing me. Can you explain how this applies when the cat itself says This category lists television programs that have regularly aired their first-run episodes on Pogo. It does not list programs which first appeared on a different network.? Not only is this not applicable because the first run was on ABC, but it's not episodic. It's a special. There are many such instances of this that I can't begin to fathom how it applies to the articles you've added them to. Praxidicae (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

What he said: how the hell can a channel started in 2004 be showing "first runs" of a series from 1973 (The Addams Family (1973 TV series)) or 1964 (The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends)? I am reversing all of these, and unless you can provide some evidence that Pogo had anything whatsoever to do with their original productions, they're staying reversed. --Calton | Talk 13:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Calton Thanks, I thought I was going crazy when I first started seeing this pop up on things like Barney and Friends. Praxidicae (talk) 13:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
@ZI Jony: You've edited since I've left this message several minutes ago. You've had time to read it and I strongly suggest you do and respond here as you are required to do when using automated tools. If you do not, I will escalate this to ANI as it is massively disruptive. Thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 13:06, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
@Praxidicae and Calton: I even confusing itself! I can't explain on this, but thanks for your undaunted and taking care of me. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
ZI Jony I'm sorry but this is not a satisfactory response. When using tools you are responsible for your edits. Screwing up a handful of times is one thing, doing it 207 times in a row without a care is disruptive. Praxidicae (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Praxidicae, YES, I'm responsible for my edits, but it is my first quick categories batch. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
What exactly were you doing when you did this? Please explain the process that led to you making 207 rapid edits without actually reviewing any of them. Also you made 691 edits in 6 minutes on Wikidata yesterday...this is absurd. Praxidicae (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
And let me be very clear in what I'm asking. What lead to you making 207 article edits, where did the data for that category come from? Praxidicae (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Praxidicae, I was looking List of programmes broadcast by Pogo and Category:Pogo (TV channel) original programming, when I saw that both are not matched then I was think about to run quick category. About Wikidata I'm ruing QS time to time, and ruing QS is not my hand. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Not to mention that several of the articles weren't even television programs (Film and Sherlock Holmes, to name but two). --Calton | Talk 13:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I don't even know how to respond to this at this point. You didn't bother to check if that was correct? And decided to use an automated tool en masse without doing any test trials on a small number of articles? There are only 7 articles on that page that are under original programming. Will you make a commitment to refrain from using automated tools/scripts until you can demonstrate competence and accountability for your use of said tools? Praxidicae (talk) 13:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
    Praxidicae, Usually I'm not doing like this, but I could commit not to use tools like this. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

request

Hey jony I requested you to please also edit the Wikipedia page of French animated series " Grizzy and the Lemmings " . please there are very unsourced material in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.220.98.208 (talk) 11:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

You are full free to edit where necessary, the article is not protected from IP editing. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello Zi jony please create another Wikipedia for episodes of "Grizzy and the lemmings" in that ariticle. "List of Grizzy and the Lemmings episodes" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4055:2E04:1212:0:0:3E4B:2902 (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

NPP check in

Hey, I reviewed some of your recent patrols and wanted to share some feedback. Overall you're doing a good job, and I don't see any cases where I disagree outright with your decision to approve an article out of the queue. However, there's been a few cases where I think you neglected to add tags that probably should have been added. For instance, Stefan Gebhardt probably needs a {{third-party}} tag as almost the entire article is cited to Gebhardt's current party, Acts of Pilate could use {{more footnotes}} or possibly {{refimprove}}, as it includes entirely uncited paragraphs, and Kamao should probably have {{notability}} as it appears to only have one secondary reliable source cited. Overall, keep up the good work! signed, Rosguill talk 20:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Rosguill Thank you for your suggestions and valuable feedback, I've tagged as you suggested, and will try to make sure that in future itself. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of article

Hi Jony, I do not work for the assisted dying coalition. But I was asked to set up an article for them as they are an organisation. There is nothing bias about the information in the article. So can you please not delete my work? I am confused as to why you would delete this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarskj (talk • contribs) 13:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Sarskj:, It seems that content was advertising, which was promotes that organisation. It was also appeared copyright infringement of assisteddying.org.uk/about/. We cannot accept copyrighted text on Wikipedia, and Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Request for creating a Wikipedia

Hello jony, please create a Wikipedia of Studio Hari, Please create this and i will help to improve it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.185.128.81 (talk) 12:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Please see WP:AFC, you can start itself. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Request for creating a Wikipedia

Please create the Wikipedia of ""Studio Hari"" which is the production company of "Grizzy and the lemmings " — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.185.130.1 (talk) 15:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Please see WP:AFC, you can start itself. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Edit filter false positive on Brace Belden article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives/Rolling_archive#Blebaford

Hi, I am new to editing Wikipedia, so I hope this is the best place for this. You assessed the above linked issue as "vandalism," and I would like to request that you take a second look. In particular if you listen to the first few seconds of the podcast I think you'll see that it is an accurate contribution and not vandalism.

Judging from the other nicknames on the list, and their references, this edit seems perfectly in line, though we are admittedly having a little fun. Thanks!

-- Blebaford (I would have logged in, but I forgot my password and did too many failed attempts) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.173.81 (talk) 17:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

There was vandalism! you can see this, someone has added those content, and one of RC patroller removed as vandalism. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Both that edit and mine gave sources which back up the claim that Racial Jake is a nickname for Brace Belden (in the YouTube video, Brace Belden uses RACIALJAKE for his name in Among Us). That makes two different sources backing this up as factual information -- I can think of one more, but it is a pay-walled episode. Is it possible that you and AngryHarpy are mistaken? Does it matter that there are two sources backing this up? Or do you disagree that the sources support the edits? Thanks. --Blebaford (talk) 14:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Blebaford, without reliable sources we could not add that info. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 15:06, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
I see. Is this edit different from the other nicknames based on primary sources? (Mr. Bean, Showbiz, Mr. Fireworks, Bad Boy Brace Belden, The Dark Cowboy?) Does the requirement for secondary sources only apply to edits caught by the edit filter, or should we remove these other nicknames in order to be consistent? --Blebaford (talk) 13:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

FMRFAN as a WAM jury member

Hi, FMRFAN (talk · contribs) asked me to add them to the EnWiki WAM as a jury member; are you ok with that? Le Loy 09:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ле Лой, I'd recommend you to accept the request from organizers or another jury. With 13 edits since: 2020-10-31, I'd recommend declining that request. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit filter false positive on Brace Belden article

Hi, I wanted to follow up on our discussion here. You said my edit would have required reliable sources, while many other nicknames have been added without reliable sources. I was hoping to understand this policy, to see if some other nicknames should be removed for consistency. As it stands, the nicknames that I was unable to add are more prominent than many of those currently in the article, which seems misleading. I am happy to ask another editor, but I thought I should follow up with you since we were already in discussion. --Blebaford (talk) 23:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Blebaford, Please discuss on the article talk page, I don't have any problem if someone else accepts your request. I didn't feel that I can accept, so I reject that. Thanks for your understanding. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Requested for creating an article

Hello Jony Please create a Wikipedia of an Indian animated television series ""Titoo - Har Jawaab Ka Sawaal Hu"" . I have been blocked by an editor Cyphoidbomb, so I can't create the article. Please create an article of ""Titoo - Har Jawaab Ka Sawaal Hu"".

1.) First of all, go to the Wikipedia of List of programs broadcast by Pogo. 2.) Then in current programming , you see written ""Titoo - Har Jawaab Ka Sawaal Hu"" in red colour ( because the article is not created ). 3.) Then please create the article.

I shall be very thankful to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:40CE:D214:0:2B:D21F:F201 (talk) 03:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Jury of the WikiUral competition and the prize

WikiUral Logo (The Mistress of the Copper Mountain) En
WikiUral Logo (The Mistress of the Copper Mountain) En

Good afternoon, ZI Jony!

Thank you for your interest in the WikiUral 2020 contest!

To receive the prize, please fill out the form we sent you via wiki mail.

Regards, Organizing Committee of the WikiUral contest. — Niklitov (talk) 22:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Requested for creating an article

Hello , please create an article of ""Studio Hari"". I created it but someone delete due to sockpuppet.🙏🏻 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:41F6:EF2B:0:B:5623:1 (talk) 07:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Hello ZI Jony:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Private information from the Wikipedia Asian Month response form is accessible to the public

Considering the fact that we had to confirm that we read the Wikipedia Asian Month privacy policy, it would be nice if the private information we provide were not accessible to the public. I can clearly read everyone's home address and easily match them up with their private e-mail address using this linked form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSftK0OwA_f1ZVtCULlyi4bKU9w2Z7QfW4Y_1v9ltdTIFKFcXQ/viewanalytics Could you do something about that? --Nicholas0 (talk) 21:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Nicholas0, thanks for your advice, I think that has been fixed, please check again. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
The other organizers fixed it a while ago after I informed them. --Nicholas0 (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:William Boone Bonvillian

Information icon Hello, ZI Jony. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:William Boone Bonvillian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 10:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Abbas Ibrahim

When you move a page over the top of a redirect that targets a different page, establishing a new WP:primary topic, as page-movers can now do due to the new delete-redirect right, please be sure to add a hatnote at the top of the new PT, as I did here. Also noting the previous discussion at Talk:Abbas Ibrahim (Lebanese officer)#Requested move 19 November 2020, I likely would have declined the technical request and converted it to an RM discussion. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 12:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

wbm1058, noted, thanks for your valuable comments and advice. I'll be very careful with updated guidelines. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello ZI Jony, Thank you for your contribution to Aranthangi Nisha please keep on improving this page as much as you can :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.108.86.194 (talk) 04:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

David Pramik Automatic Filter

Hey ZI Jony,

Could you please clarify how the automatic filter did not report a false positive? I'm having a hard time figuring out why fixing grammatical errors, updating a profile picture to a more recent recognizable photo and updating a reference at the request of an editor who mentioned a citation was needed, and updating a discography into a more easily legible table falls under disruptive editing. If you could clarify, that'd be great. Thanks.

@HyphyHyphyJoyJoy:, You are saying that profile picture and updating a reference, but you also removed COI template which should not be happen. That's why filter 878 was stop you as "New user removing COI template". Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey ZI Jony, The same filter is still blocking edits, despite not taking out the COI template. Could you please clarify why this is still occurring? Thanks HyphyHyphyJoyJoy (talk) 05:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
@HyphyHyphyJoyJoy:, this time you are replacing the page content, better you report WP:EFFPR for everytime. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 10:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Sammohanam talk page

Hello. Would you move Talk:Sammohanam (2018 film) to Talk:Sammohanam; consistent with the main article Sammohanam. Because the talk page is a redirect, it is getting in the way of the move. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 05:32, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

@Ab207:, it's suppose to done automatically when page was moved! however, I've  moved now. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 22:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
ZI Jony, it hasn't been moved. —В²C ☎ 05:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Looks like that. Talk:Sammohanam (1994 film) was moved to Talk:Sammohanam. But as per RM, Talk:Sammohanam (2018 film) should be moved to Talk:Sammohanam while Talk:Sammohanam (1994 film) should be where it was. Hope I'm clear. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
@Ab207 and Born2cycle:,  Fixed Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Himesh Mankad

Hello sir , What to do to remove the tag named orphan PA12194 (talk) 06:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

@PA12194: Please introduce links to Himesh Mankad page from related articles. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Sir, when you checked the Wikipedia page yesterday, I added 10 links after it PA12194 (talk) 08:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
@PA12194: Please introduce [[Himesh Mankad]] to other pages that are related articles of Himesh Mankad. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I have done as you said Sir PA12194 (talk) 10:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Sir, I have attached all those links. Can you remove the attached orphan tag? PA12194 (talk) 14:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

PA12194, please feel free to remove itself. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 22:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you 🙏 PA12194 (talk) 03:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Sawt al-Bahrain

Hi, you have inserted an orphan template to this article. I could not figure out the reason, because it has links to several articles. So it is deleted, best --Egeymi (talk) 13:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@Egeymi:, you are an experienced user, you know what is orphan article. Please see Special:WhatLinksHere/Sawt_al-Bahrain, I just linked Sawt al-Bahrain on Ahmed Salman Kamal, try to make some more. Thanks! Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Yes, I know the rule, but tried to learn whether or not I am missing any point. --Egeymi (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
That's realty good. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:31, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2020 Le Castellet Formula Regional European Championship round, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 21:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rabbi Ventura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello

How are you brother. I am very happy to see a Bangladeshi Wikipedia who has got 3 more post in English Wikipedia. Thanks. Sami Yusuf Khan (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

@Sami Yusuf Khan:, its not about user rights, if user rights is necessary for your action and you know how to use then you will have those user rights, but you should be trusted and experienced user. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Could we be friendly outside of Wikipedia? Sami Yusuf Khan (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
@Sami Yusuf Khan:, I'm always friendly on-wiki nor off- wiki. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 22:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Soviet-Afghan War

Hi! You reverted my last edits [2], but did not provide an explanation. Can you give a reason why, and can you be specific which part, since the text had mutiple additions?--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

@3E1I5S8B9RF7:, please see User talk:3E1I5S8B9RF7#April 2021. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I am afraid you haven't even checked that much what you reverted, since you even reverted my correction of spelling from "Bibiliography" to "Bibliography". You wrote: "...you should know that it is not a good idea to remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Soviet–Afghan War. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained." Which dead links were removed? The sources in the said article are a mess, and thus I tried to organize them at least a bit; for example, the source "Coll, Steven (2004). Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA..." is used twice in the text, even though it is already in the "Bibliography" section at the end. So I just changed it to { {sfn | Coll | 2004 | p=} }. The same goes for the source "Kepel, Gilles (2002), Jihad: The Trail of...", which was used over ten times in the text; I just changed it to { {sfn | Kepel | 2002 | p=} } How is that in dispute? Some of these references of Kepel included large quotes from his book, which I shortened by simply using the page number, i.e. { {sfn | Kepel | 2002 | p=138} }. Since the article in question is already very large, I did not see how using large quotes from a book is essential or necessary when you have a page number in the references which just gives a location of the said quote. It takes nothing away from verifiability, but improves the elegance of the sources.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 13:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
@3E1I5S8B9RF7:, copying warning message are not necessary, I know what I've posted on your talk page.
I'd like suggest you to pay more attention in edit summary and specify what you have done and why, please see this for a example. It will avoid confusing with others. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
That is not true. As visible here [3], I did not remove archive.org/details/The_Soviet-Afghan_War_How_a_Superpower_Fought_and_Lost, I just changed it to {{sfn|Grau|Gress|2002|p=43}} with the book moved to the "Bibliography" section. I did not know about the necessity of adding an edit summary, yet you could have simply informed me about it, and I would have implemented it by writing "c/e" each time. I'd like to suggest you to pay more attention to what you revert, and to restore my previous edit, considering that you were unable to show any unreasonable disruption among my edits.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
@3E1I5S8B9RF7:, sorry, there was a misunderstanding, which I've fixed now. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 21:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

No, you again made an error. Because you did not restore the book by Grau & Gress in the Bibliography section. Nor did you restore the "Kepel, Gilles (2006). Jihad: The Trail..." sfn reference. We again have Kepel's book being repeated almost ten times in the article when we can just use the sfn reference instead. Just restore the revert.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:58, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

@3E1I5S8B9RF7: you can do itself. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Team mate or teammate

Hi ZI, thank you for adding the hatnote to Baloot. I notice you changed team mate to teammate. In fact, teammate, team mate and team-mate are all listed as acceptable spellings in the Cambridge Dictionary. I think American English tends to prefer compound nouns more than other forms of English, but none is wrong. I don't intend to revert it, I was just passing on the information I found. Cheers.Bermicourt (talk) 07:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bermicourt, you are right, any one could be use, all three are acceptable spellings, I just fixed typos per AWB typos. Feel free to change teammate to team mate, but whence someone else will run AWB, again it will change! Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Final Call for Candidates for AffCom - June 2021

<languages /> {{Help translate/AffCom Elections June 2021}}

Affiliations Committee (AffCom) logo

This is an update from the Wikimedia Affiliations Committee. Translations are available.

This is a final Call for Candidates for the June 2021 Affiliations Committee election.

If you are interested in running, please post your application and follow all four steps on the nomination page by 30 June 2021 23:59 hours UTC.

If you know somebody you think may be interested, please share this with them and encourage them to consider it. If you have any questions about this process or the requirements, please email affcom@wikimedia.org before the application deadline or reach out to any of the current members.

On behalf of the AffCom elections committee,

--- FULBERT (talk) 14:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


Category:Affiliations committee communications Category:AffCom Elections June 2021 Category:Help translate templates [[:Category:AffCom Elections June 2021{{#translation:}}|]]

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello ZI Jony:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Clarification in Patrolling process

Hi,

First of all thanks for correcting the mistake (Fix errors for CW project: Multiple categories on one line) in the article: Gopinath Ravi

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gopinath_Ravi

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubaru_Mr._India

These page haven't got patrolled for long time it seems. The page which I created after this is got Patrolled but not this. What could be the reason? Do I wanna include anything in the article? Can you check & explain please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamesh Aravind P (talk • contribs) 20:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

@Kamesh Aravind P:, will done soon by one of new page patrollers. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. Kamesh Aravind P (talk) 17:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Bob Dylan

What on earth have you done at Bob Dylan and why? Fix it now. JG66 (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi JG66, nothing wrong updated there, a piped link has identified that text before and after the pipe are same, which I've fixed. Thanks! Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 01:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
I was talking about how you deleted half the entire article with this edit. JG66 (talk) 13:34, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi JG66, I'm really sorry for that, I didn't noticed that. That maybe happened by error/mistake, thanks for fixing up. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:15, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. Might be an idea to use the "Show changes" preview when you're travelling from article to article, particularly when they're a Featured Article. JG66 (talk) 05:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
I understand, but that day one time my device was shut down during saving edit because of unexpected power trip. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for fixing errors. Grimes2 (talk) 17:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about that template screw-up

I really don't know how to do much beyond linking! Appreciate the fixes. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad 'Abid al-Sindi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sindhi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Cosmetic edits

Hi ZI Jony! Edits like this one appear to be entirely cosmetic. Per WP:COSMETICBOT, please do not make edits like this unless they are accompanied by a non-cosmetic change. Thanks, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sdkb, thanks for letting me know. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 20:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Looks like this one (and the other edits from the respective batch) is cosmetic too. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
1234qwer1234qwer4, I'll mark skip only cosmetic changes are made. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

IEEE Sensors Council

Thanks for the edits on this Wikipedia page Empespark (talk) 00:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Mistake

Please i was reading through your explanation the aya for Al Kursi is 255 not 256 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.229.223.3 (talk) 01:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Could you please ling that page here? Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 02:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you :0)

Hey ZI Jony , thank you for your recent changes to our family page, much appreciated.

M — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.18.153.200 (talk) 01:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rourkela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPU.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Review Request

Hi @ZI Jony there was a change about the orphan tag by you, can you please review Atatürk's nationalism, please? 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 15:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Vikipolimer, it's already reviewed by John B123. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 22:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
@ZI Jony Can I remove the orphan tag? 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 22:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Vikipolimer, Yes, feel free to remove, it's no more orphan now. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 22:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

2021–22 Coupe de France preliminary rounds, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes. Commentry -> Commentary

Hi there. You've twice now changed Commentry FC to Commentary FC in the above article via AWB. Despite your first change being reverted with an explanation that this is incorrect in context. Please take more care in checking the context of your automated edits. Thanks, Gricehead (talk) 17:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Gricehead, Those changes were done because of WP:AWB/T, it's should change there. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2021?

Would you consider organizing the English version of Wikipedia Asian Month for 2021? --Nicholas0 (talk) 02:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Nicholas0, yes, I'll do. I was quite busy, however, everything will set up soon. Thanks for a reminder. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Nicholas0, all set, you can see the project page here. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
That's great. Thank you. --Nicholas0 (talk) 17:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

about the contest

Can you tell me about the contest and how to participate in it and what are the topics of article to submit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubham Gupta0525 (talk • contribs) 06:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Shubham Gupta0525, please read Wikipedia:Wikipedia Asian Month/2021 for more info, and sign here to participant. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 00:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Abbreviation of Doctor of Philosophy preferred by Manual of Style

Hello ZI Jony,

I noticed that in your recent edits to the Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission article you changed five instances of "Ph.D" to "Ph.D.". My reading of MOS:Abbreviations#Abbreviations widely used in Wikipedia -- the portion of the table marked "Academic degrees, professional titles, etc., used with personal names" -- as well as the Doctor of Philosophy article itself indicates to me that the abbreviation that the Manual of Style prefers is "PhD" (no periods). Is your reading of the MOS different from mine? If you have no objection I will make the change to PhD in the Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission article unless you prefer to.

Thank you for your consideration,

Dieter.Meinertzhagen (talk) 22:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Dieter.Meinertzhagen, all changes were done based on WP:AWB/T, if you make "Ph.D" AWB will change to "Ph.D." as it’s correct. But, if you make PhD per MOS, AWB will not change anything. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 23:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello ZI Jony,
Thank you for the link to WP:AWB/T. I understand the situation better now.
regards,
Dieter.Meinertzhagen (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

WAM general info doesn't agree with rules

Hello: I'm curious why various WAM pages (such as Wikipedia:Asian_Month) said the event is to promote "the creation or improvement of the Wikipedia content about Asia," but the rules and Fountain only accommodated the creation of new articles. I worked on improving the existing article about Indian musician Debashish Bhattacharya, but when I asked about it over at Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Asian_Month/Submissions, my submission was rejected. Thanks! Peterh6658 (talk) 00:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZI_Jony/Archive_6&oldid=1062568721"