User talk:Zppix/Archives/2015/December

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Karbala

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Karbala. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eagles of Death Metal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eagles of Death Metal. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mariah Carey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mariah Carey. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Edit on "Emo-ti-on".

Instead of just reverting my edit and warn me, please check what I deleted because that section is useless (what does "popular tracks" mean? according to who/what? Why no other album page has it? Have you actually read what is written in it? Just badly written facts with linked sources that stated nothing of what is written (written probably by a fan of the singer with no knowledge of how Wikipedia work). So please, next time, instead of warning an IP-user, just check. --212.189.140.220 (talk) 20:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muhammad

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muhammad. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ed Sheeran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ed Sheeran. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research

This was a mistake on your part [1]. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 21:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I saw a whole lot removed and I didn't see that it read like an ad... sorry man. We all make mistakes --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 San Bernardino shooting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 San Bernardino shooting. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Cycling in different countries and cities

You were a bit hasty is reverting Template:Cycling in different countries and cities. All htose flags were unneeded clutter, template of that type don't have flags, and you removed some important links. 203.109.162.133 (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ivo Andrić

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ivo Andrić. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dochub Logo.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Dochub Logo.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello

Hi appreciate your message. I don't agree. This information may b relevant in other areas of deepak chop rad page. However it does not belong in the intro. It appears you are biased as this is a rudimentary change and an honest change. The information does not belong in the introduction. Simple as that. If you have any real reason you want this page to be compromised please let me know. If you have no personal investment in denigrating this man-then please explain to me why you insist on having biased information that does not demonstrate both sides of an argument. What's more this is not an argument of a page. When other great philosophers are introduce none of this rubbish is written!- why about this man? I will continue to edit as many others who see that this page has become somewhat of a joke! Lauren55 (talk) 20:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC) @Lauren55: what are you talking about?

rollback/pending changes reviewer user rights

Hello Zppix. Your account has been granted the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.

Rollback user right

Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).

Pending changes reviewer user right

The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! Katie^talk 22:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

why are you threatening me?

Why are you threatening me? What was wrong with my edits? i think the article is too detailed as there are other articles to give day by day detail. Is this how you welcome new editors? Maybe I wont bother registering after all — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.6.192 (talk) 22:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

86.190.6.192, i'm not. your removing content that was factual... But if you choose to not register because of me then so be it. Also please always sign your posts that are towards a talk page using ~~~~ Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 22:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) It's usual to give a level 1 warning first rather than go straight to level 3. WP:AGF? PamD 23:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

De-PRODed Modern Physics course at Nazarbayev university

Hi Zppix, just dropping you a line to let you know I removed the PROD on Modern Physics course at Nazarbayev university as another editor has tagged it with a valid CSD tag. Cheers! -- samtar ^whisper 14:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC) Hey Samtar thanks Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism warning? Really?

Re: List of Star Wars: The Clone Wars episodes. Couple things: first of all, the links to disruptive editing and vandalism you provided explicitly say disruptive editing is NOT vandalism. Second, I deleted an entire section that is completely unnecessary to the page. Not only is the section completely irrelevant to the main subject of the page, it's horrendously done. Anyone with eyes can see that section needs to go. Vandalism is defined as a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia. I was deliberately attempting to improve Wikipedia by removing that travesty. 173.18.64.137 (talk) 15:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

I have to agree that your reversion here was not warranted. The IP should not have removed it without leaving an edit summary, but the removal of material was justified as it was an unsourced and poorly written collection of trivia about light saber battles that does not belong in the article List of Star Wars: The Clone Wars episodes, which is simply a list of episodes. The IP's removal of the material was not vandalism and thus your reversion without an edit summary was not correct. I have undone your reversion, and I suggest that you be more careful of your use of the revert button.

Furthermore, your jumping straight to a level 3 vandalism warning when he or she has no previous warnings (and no previous edits) is also unjustified. I have struck your warning on the IP's page. Meters (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ben Carson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ben Carson. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

That you're experienced and are willing to adopt

I've been wondering since I've noticed you why you have the following userbox on your user page: "This experienced editor is seeking to adopt new users. (Users requesting adoption)." That box states that you are experienced, and yet your account is new. You also don't edit like a complete newbie. Even so, given current comments on your talk page, you clearly are not as experienced as you might think; therefore, I'm skeptical of your ability to adopt a user. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Reply

If someone has reported me then it's worth looking into. What's going on is you have regular people like me- just an individual- then u have people like the other editor-who belong to a team of editors. What's happening in wika is a very unfair dishonest culture of bullying. It's quite clear that I stand on the side of truth and justice. You just wrote to me that an editor may get irritated and not accept my change. What a joke and need I explain why. What a disagracefil immoral wastland you are editing in. This site is about truth and you are an editor- a nice position to be in. But I have just witnessed you accept a very shady edit over mine, which only removed slanderous talk. So I must question the validity of Wikipedia once again. Often Wikipedia is laughed at as a source of fact and now I know why. It is actually biased. So I will NEVER get along with or b sweet- to get an edit accepted. I am actually just HELPING!! So go back to your crooked side as I am happy for u to put out false biased information- it affects my life not at all. I suggest you yourself actually do some research- look at the page- and make it fair. If you want to criticise in the intro then maybe back it up with all the accolades this man has received. As it stands now- it belies Wikipedia to be a very 3rd rate information centre. . Good luck! Lauren55 (talk) 20:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Yep! Wikipedia is only as good as the editors and a lot of the editors are no good. 203.109.162.133 (talk) 02:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

But it does look like you are pushing a POV and sanitising the Chopra article. 203.109.162.133 (talk) 02:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Zppix, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Please comment on Talk:Edward VIII

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Edward VIII. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Places in England

Category:Places in England has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:November 2015 Paris attacks

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:November 2015 Paris attacks. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 San Bernardino shooting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 San Bernardino shooting. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Menachem Mendel Schneerson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David L. Jones

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David L. Jones. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elagabalus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elagabalus. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Madison Young

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Madison Young. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jarret Myer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jarret Myer. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alan Berg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alan Berg. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brienne Ghafourifar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brienne Ghafourifar. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 16:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David L. Jones

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David L. Jones. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mudar Zahran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mudar Zahran. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oldest people

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oldest people. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Séralini affair

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Séralini affair. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Zppix!

Happy New Year!

Zppix,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 23:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.